Percutaneous Vocal Fold Lateralization in children - a case series of a Brazilian tertiary pediatric hospital (pediatric vocal fold lateralization cases in a Brazilian hospital).

OBJECTIVES: Percutaneous Vocal Fold Lateralization (PVFL) consists of external fixation with non-absorbable percutaneous suture of the vocal fold in a lateral position, under direct glottic visualization. The objective of this study is to determine the effectiveness of PVFL in a university pediatric hospital, as well as to describe the potential risks and complications of the surgery. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study, with data collected from electronic medical records. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the institution. Surgeries were performed with the modified Lichentenberg technique and data, and outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Six patients with Bilateral Vocal Fold Paralysis who underwent Percutaneous Vocal Fold Lateralization were evaluated. Three patients were male. The age at diagnosis ranged from 2 to 132 days (mean 10.5 days). The reason for investigating the upper airway was the presence of increased work of breathing and stridor. Five patients had a favorable clinical evolution, with spontaneous ventilation in room air and absence of stridor or ventilatory effort, without the need for tracheostomy. Surgical results in this series corroborate the findings of other similar cohorts, which showed Percutaneous Vocal Fold Lateralization as a safe and effective procedure in avoiding tracheostomy or allowing decannulation in children with Bilateral Vocal Fold Paralysis. CONCLUSIONS: PVFL seems to be a safe and effective procedure, but it has morbidity, due to immediate, and probably late, non-serious complications. Studies with a larger number of patients, with longer follow-up and using a controlled and randomized clinical design are needed to establish the role of PVFL in the treatment of BVFP in newborns and infants. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Level 4 (step 4).

Outcomes of delayed tracheostomy among intubated patients during the coronavirus disease pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Respiratory distress and failure is a complication of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and tracheostomy may be necessary in cases of prolonged intubation in order to reduce mechanical ventilation duration. However, according to the Canadian Society of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery guidelines, which our institution applies, patients should not undergo tracheostomy unless cleared of the virus to reduce its spread among healthcare workers because tracheostomy is an aerosolized procedure. This study aimed to identify the outcomes of prolonged intubation in patients with and without COVID-19 who underwent tracheostomy and to determine the morbidity and mortality rates in both groups. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit of King Fahad Hospital of the University, Alkhobar, Saudi Arabia, between March 1 and October 31, 2020. This study compared and analyzed the outcomes of delayed tracheostomy in patients with and without COVID-19 in terms of complication, morbidity, and mortality rates. RESULTS: Of the 228 study participants, 111 (48.68%) had COVID-19. The mean age of the study participants was 58.67 years (SD = 17.36, max.=93, min.=20), and the majority were males (n = 149, 65.35%). Regarding tracheostomy in patients with COVID-19, 11 (9.91%) patients underwent tracheostomy; however, four (36.36%) of them had prolonged intubation. The mean intensive care unit admission length of stay for tracheostomy patients was 37.17 days, while it was 12.09 days for patients without tracheostomy (t(226)=-9.32, p < 0.001). Regarding prolonged intubation among patients with COVID-19 (n = 7, 6.31%), the complications were as follows: six people (85.71%) had dysphonia, one (14.29%) had vocal cord granuloma, and two (28.57%) had subglottic tracheal stenosis. The mortality rate among our study participants was 51.32%, and the risk was significantly higher in older people (Odds ratio = 1.04, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] = 1.02-1.06) and in delayed tracheostomy cases (OR = 2.95, 95% CI = 1.31-6.63). However, COVID-19 status was not significantly related to the risk of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Delaying tracheostomy increases the risk of mortality. Therefore, we recommend weighing the risks and benefits for each patient to benefit both healthcare workers and patients with COVID-19.

Can Prophylactic Tracheostomy be Avoided in Advanced Oral Cancer Surgery for Airway Management? An Experience and Guidelines from a Tertiary Care Facility.

Aim: To evaluate the surgical and postoperative management strategies that contribute to minimizing the need for prophylactic tracheostomy for airway management in advanced oral cancer surgery. Methods: A retrospective review of the patients who underwent surgery for advanced oral cancer, in our institution from February 2015 to January 2024. Results: In the present review, 66 patients (males, n = 54; females, n = 12; mean age 50.3 years) who were operated for advanced oral cancer (T3, T4 oral squamous cell carcinoma and osteosarcoma of the mandible requiring mandibular resection) in our institution were included. 60 patients (90.9%) had reconstruction after segmental resection of the mandible without the need for prophylactic tracheostomy. Out of these, eighteen patients (27.27%) required segmental resection of the mandible crossing midline. Six patients (9.1%) underwent prophylactic tracheostomy, of which two patients had unilateral tumor and four patients had tumor crossing midline. Comparison of hospital stays between patients who underwent prophylactic tracheostomy and those who did not yielded mean durations of 13.3 days and 7.6 days, respectively. Conclusion: Except a subset of patients with old age, obesity, bulky neck, and those with respiratory compromise, following the present guidelines, prophylactic tracheostomy can be avoided in patients undergoing surgery for advanced oral cancer.

TrachGPT: Appraisal of tracheostomy care recommendations from an artificial intelligent Chatbot.

Objective: Safe home tracheostomy care requires engagement and troubleshooting by patients, who may turn to online, AI-generated information sources. This study assessed the quality of ChatGPT responses to such queries. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, ChatGPT was prompted with 10 hypothetical tracheostomy care questions in three domains (complication management, self-care advice, and lifestyle adjustment). Responses were graded by four otolaryngologists for appropriateness, accuracy, and overall score. The readability of responses was evaluated using the Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) and Flesch-Kincaid Reading Grade Level (FKRGL). Descriptive statistics and ANOVA testing were performed with statistical significance set to p < .05. Results: On a scale of 1-5, with 5 representing the greatest appropriateness or overall score and a 4-point scale with 4 representing the highest accuracy, the responses exhibited moderately high appropriateness (mean = 4.10, SD = 0.90), high accuracy (mean = 3.55, SD = 0.50), and moderately high overall scores (mean = 4.02, SD = 0.86). Scoring between response categories (self-care recommendations, complication recommendations, lifestyle adjustments, and special device considerations) revealed no significant scoring differences. Suboptimal responses lacked nuance and contained incorrect information and recommendations. Readability indicated college and advanced levels for FRE (Mean = 39.5, SD = 7.17) and FKRGL (Mean = 13.1, SD = 1.47), higher than the sixth-grade level recommended for patient-targeted resources by the NIH. Conclusion: While ChatGPT-generated tracheostomy care responses may exhibit acceptable appropriateness, incomplete or misleading information may have dire clinical consequences. Further, inappropriately high reading levels may limit patient comprehension and accessibility. At this point in its technological infancy, AI-generated information should not be solely relied upon as a direct patient care resource.

Comparing Outcomes Between Standard Mepilex and Mepilex Silver for Tracheotomy Dressings.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study is to compare the incidence of early postoperative tracheotomy stoma wound complications in pediatric patients using a silver-impregnated barrier dressing (Mepilex Ag) versus a standard absorbent foam dressing (standard Mepilex). METHODS: This is a prospective, non-blinded, randomized trial of pediatric patients undergoing tracheotomy at a tertiary care children's hospital. Patients were randomized to receive Mepilex Ag versus standard Mepilex tracheostoma dressings following tracheotomy. All patients received standard postoperative wound care and daily stomal examination. Wound related complications, breakdown, granulation, and infection were recorded for the first 7 days after surgery. A non-inferiority study design was used to test the hypothesis that the Mepilex group had a non-inferior wound complication rate (within 10% margin) compared to the Mepilex Ag group. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients were enrolled; 52 received Mepilex Ag, and 30 received standard Mepilex. There was no difference between the groups with respect to age, sex, race, surgical indication, or postoperative length of stay. Non-inferiority testing demonstrated that the Mepilex standard cohort had no more than 10% greater stomal wound complication rate than that of Mepilex Ag dressing group (p = 0.0108). CONCLUSION: Standard Mepilex was found to be non-inferior to Mepilex Ag in the prevention of tracheotomy stomal wound complications. Standard Mepilex may be used effectively in the postoperative period, potentially reducing costs to caregivers and the institution. Further work is needed to analyze additional factors that could contribute to poor postoperative stoma healing such as bacterial colonization. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Randomized Controlled Trial, Level 2 Laryngoscope, 2024.

Endoscopic recannulation of long-segment, grade IV suprastomal tracheal stenosis: An operative technique.

BACKGROUND: Long-segment, grade IV suprastomal tracheal stenosis is rare and difficult to treat (Carpenter et al., 2022 [1]). Patients with grade IV stenosis have significant quality of life impairments since they are tracheostomy dependent and aphonic. Open airway surgery is often needed to improve tracheal patency, restore the patient's voice, and progress towards decannulation (Abouyared et al., 2017 [2]). However, not all patients are candidates for upfront open surgery (Abouyared et al., 2017; Shamji, 2018 [2,3]). Therefore, it is important to develop and refine endoscopic interventions to improve quality of life for these patients. METHODS: We describe a step-by-step endoscopic approach to the recannulation of long-segment, grade IV suprastomal tracheal stenosis. Briefly, our approach utilizes dual (proximal & distal) visualization of the stenosis prior to passing a 25 gauge needle through the stenosis to identify the proper trajectory for recannulation. Then a 16 gauge needle is passed in the same manner, and a wire is placed through the needle and into the distal airway. Once the airway is recannulated, the initial pinpoint opening is gradually widened in Seldinger fashion over the wire with Savary dilators followed by balloon dilation. Finally, a suprastomal L-stent (modified Montgomery T-Tube) is placed to reduce the risk of restenosis (Edwards et al., 2023 [4]). CASE DISCUSSION: A 39-year-old woman with a past medical history significant for poorly controlled type I diabetes mellitus and polysubstance abuse presented with tracheostomy dependence and aphonia. She was diagnosed with a long-segment, grade IV suprastomal tracheal stenosis and initially underwent endoscopic recannulation. This intervention restored her voice and allowed for optimization of her medical conditions before open airway surgery. CONCLUSION: Most patients experience a significant improvement in their quality of life as their voice is typically restored following this procedure. Additionally, individuals who eventually require open airway surgery gain additional time for medical optimization. In our experience, this procedure represents a safe and effective means of extending the utility of traditional endoscopic airway interventions for the management of patients with grade IV stenosis.

Impact of tracheostomy tube modalities on ventilatory mechanics: a bench study.

PURPOSE: Tracheostomized patients often present with muscle weakness, altered consciousness, or swallowing difficulties. Hence, the literature is scarce regarding the challenging management of tracheostomy weaning. There is a need to strengthen the understanding of respiratory mechanisms with the different tracheostomy tube modalities that compose this weaning pathway. We aimed to evaluate the impact of these modalities on the work of breathing (WOB), total positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEPtot), and tidal volume (VT). METHODS: With a three-dimensional (3D) printed head mimicking human upper airways, we added a tracheal extension, and pierced to allow insertion of a size 7.0 tracheostomy cannula. The whole was connected to an artificial lung. Three lung mechanics were simulated (normal, obstructive and restrictive). We compared five different tracheostomy tube modalities to a control scenario in which the tube was capped and the cuff was deflated. RESULTS: A marginal difference was observed on the WOB within conditions with a slight increase + 0.004 [95% CI (0.003-0.004); p < 0.001] when the cuff was inflated in the normal and restrictive models and a slight decrease in the obstructive model. The highest PEEPtot that was reached was + 1 cmH2O [95% CI (1-1.1); p < 0.001] with high-flow therapy (HFT) with the cuff inflated in the obstructive model. We observed a statistically significant reduction in VT [up to - 57 mL 95% CI (- 60 to - 54); p < 0.001] when the cuff was inflated, in both the normal and obstructive models. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the use of conditions that involve cuff deflation. Intermediate modalities with the cuff deflated produced similar results than cannula capping.

Four-layer technique for tracheostomy scar treatment.

One important complication of the tracheostomy procedure is the depressed scar left after the tube is removed. A depressed tracheostomy scar can be aesthetically and functionally unacceptable. Tracheostomy scar treatment aims to fill lost soft tissue volume and correct tracheal skin tug. There are various techniques described to manage post-tracheostomy scars, including the use of autologous tissue or allogenic material and the creation of muscle flaps. In this article, the authors introduce a surgical method using four layers: the scar, the strap muscles, the platysma muscle, and the skin. This procedure has been used in two patients with depressed scar after prolonged tracheostomy placement. The tracheal tug was eliminated in each patient, and an imperceptible cutaneous scar remained. In each case, patient satisfaction was complete. The authors recommend this technique as a simple and effective method of closure for these troublesome tracheostomy scars.

Efficacy of tracheostomy for respiratory management in patients with advanced oral cancer.

BACKGROUND: Many studies have been reported on tracheostomy to prevent upper airway obstruction after surgery. Among these, the scoring system proposed by Cameron et al. quantifies various factors that influence postoperative respiratory failure. This system provides a basis for surgeons to decide whether to perform an elective tracheostomy. In this study, the authors applied the Cameron scoring system retrospectively to patients undergoing severe oral cancer surgery to reevaluate the indications for elective tracheostomy and to investigate its clinical efficacy in airway management. In this study, a sample of 20 patients who underwent oral cancer surgery was selected and divided into two groups: 10 underwent tracheostomy and 10 did not. The Cameron scoring scores for each patient were extracted, to verify whether elective tracheostomy was performed in accordance with the threshold scores. Differences in scores and significant clinical impact factors between the two groups were analyzed and compared. RESULT: The 10 patients who underwent tracheostomy had an average Cameron score of 6.4, all scoring above the recommended threshold of 5 for tracheostomy. For the 10 patients who did not undergo tracheostomy, the average score was 2.5, with 8 out of these 10 patients scoring below 5. Significant clinical impact factors observed included the location and size of the tumor, the performance of mandibulectomy and neck dissection, and the type of reconstruction surgery. CONCLUSION: In planning surgery for oral cancer patients, it is essential to consider the use of elective tracheostomy based on preoperative assessment of the risk of postoperative airway obstruction using tools like the Cameron scoring system, and patients' condition. Research confirms that elective tracheostomy effectively enhances airway management in patients with severe oral cancer.

Airway decision making in major head and neck surgery: Irish multicenter, multidisciplinary recommendations.

Major head and neck surgery poses a threat to perioperative airway patency. Adverse airway events are associated with significant morbidity, potentially leading to hypoxic brain injury and even death. Following a review of the literature, recommendations regarding airway management in head and neck surgery were developed with multicenter, multidisciplinary agreement among all Irish head and neck units. Immediate extubation is appropriate in many cases where there is a low risk of adverse airway events. Where a prolonged definitive airway is required, elective tracheostomy provides increased airway security postoperatively while delayed extubation may be appropriate in select cases to reduce postoperative morbidity. Local institutional protocols should be developed to care for a tracheostomy once inserted. We provide guidance on decision making surrounding airway management at time of head and neck surgery. All decisions should be agreed between the operating, anesthetic, and critical care teams.

Predicting Tracheostomy Need on Admission to the Intensive Care Unit-A Multicenter Machine Learning Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: It is difficult to predict which mechanically ventilated patients will ultimately require a tracheostomy which further predisposes them to unnecessary spontaneous breathing trials, additional time on the ventilator, increased costs, and further ventilation-related complications such as subglottic stenosis. In this study, we aimed to develop a machine learning tool to predict which patients need a tracheostomy at the onset of admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective Cohort Study. SETTING: Multicenter Study of 335 Intensive Care Units between 2014 and 2015. METHODS: The eICU Collaborative Research Database (eICU-CRD) was utilized to obtain the patient cohort. Inclusion criteria included: (1) Age >18 years and (2) ICU admission requiring mechanical ventilation. The primary outcome of interest included tracheostomy assessed via a binary classification model. Models included logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost). RESULTS: Of 38,508 invasively mechanically ventilated patients, 1605 patients underwent a tracheostomy. The XGBoost, RF, and LR models had fair performances at an AUROC 0.794, 0.780, and 0.775 respectively. Limiting the XGBoost model to 20 features out of 331, a minimal reduction in performance was observed with an AUROC of 0.778. Using Shapley Additive Explanations, the top features were an admission diagnosis of pneumonia or sepsis and comorbidity of chronic respiratory failure. CONCLUSIONS: Our machine learning model accurately predicts the probability that a patient will eventually require a tracheostomy upon ICU admission, and upon prospective validation, we have the potential to institute earlier interventions and reduce the complications of prolonged ventilation.

Mechanical power density, spontaneous breathing indexes, and prolonged weaning failure: a prospective cohort study.

A prospective observational study comparing mechanical power density (MP normalized to dynamic compliance) with traditional spontaneous breathing indexes (e.g., predicted body weight normalized tidal volume [VT/PBW], rapid shallow breathing index [RSBI], or the integrative weaning index [IWI]) for predicting prolonged weaning failure in 140 tracheotomized patients. We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of these indexes at the start and end of the weaning procedure using ROC curve analysis, expressed as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Weaning failure occurred in 41 out of 140 patients (29%), demonstrating significantly higher MP density (6156 cmH2O2/min [4402-7910] vs. 3004 cmH2O2/min [2153-3917], P < 0.01), lower spontaneous VT/PBW (5.8 mL*kg-1 [4.8-6.8] vs. 6.6 mL*kg-1 [5.7-7.9], P < 0.01) higher RSBI (68 min-1*L-1 [44-91] vs. 55 min-1*L-1 [41-76], P < 0.01) and lower IWI (41 L2/cmH2O*%*min*10-3 [25-72] vs. 71 L2/cmH2O*%*min*10-3 [50-106], P < 0.01) and at the end of weaning. MP density was more accurate at predicting weaning failures (AUROC 0.91 [95%CI 0.84-0.95]) than VT/PBW (0.67 [0.58-0.74]), RSBI (0.62 [0.53-0.70]), or IWI (0.73 [0.65-0.80]), and may help clinicians in identifying patients at high risk for long-term ventilator dependency.

Tracheostomy before and during COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to provide insight into the influence of the COVID-19 on the frequency and characteristics of urgent and emergent tracheostomies (TS), comparing data collected both before and during the pandemic. Our two hypotheses were that during COVID-19, more TS were performed in the emergent setting and that during COVID-19 more TS were performed under general anaesthesia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The research was retrospective. The study period included the two years before and after the COVID-19 outbreak in Slovenia. Forty-one patients in each period met the inclusion criteria. Their medical charts were reviewed. The anamnestic, clinical, surgical and anaesthesiological data were collected. The two groups of patients from corresponding time periods were statistically compared. RESULTS: Predominantly men required the surgical resolution of acute upper airway obstruction (76% of patients). The causes for acute respiratory distress included head and neck cancer (62%), infections (20%), vocal cord paralysis (16%), and stenosis (2%). There were no statistically significant differences either in the (emergent/urgent) setting of TS or in the type of anaesthesia used. Both hypotheses were rejected. A statistically significant rise in use of the C-MAC laryngoscope during COVID-19 (from 3% to 15%) was reported. CONCLUSIONS: The outbreak of COVID-19 did not have a statistically significant effect on the frequency of performing emergent and urgent tracheostomies nor on the use of general or local anaesthesia. It did, however, require a change of intubation technique. Consequently, a significant rise in the use of the C-MAC laryngoscope was noted.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical approaches for improving airway stability in infants with Robin sequence: evaluating complications and outcomes.

The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the most effective and least morbid surgical technique for relieving retroglossal airway obstruction in infants with Robin sequence (RS). The study adhered to PRISMA guidelines and included 25 studies (24 cohorts and one case series) that investigated interventions for airway improvement, including conservative measures, tongue-lip adhesion (TLA), mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO), and tracheostomy. The primary outcome variable was complication rate, while predictor variable was the use of interventions for airway improvement. Results showed that conservative measures were the preferred initial management strategy in most studies, while TLA was recommended for infants with mild obstruction, and MDO or tracheostomy was reserved for severe cases. Only complications could be analysed via meta-analysis due to data heterogeneity, revealing that tracheostomy had a summary odds ratio of 5.39 in favour of TLA, while MDO had a ratio of 2.8 over TLA, and the complication rates were similar between MDO and tracheostomy. If conservative measures fail, the study recommends mandibular distraction as the preferable technique for stable airway improvement. If the infant is unsuitable for distraction, tongue-lip adhesion may serve as an alternative, while tracheostomy should be reserved for cases of severe multi-level obstruction. The authors propose that large-scale, multicentre trials comparing long-term outcomes are required to establish definitive guidelines.

Practical guide to building machine learning-based clinical prediction models using imbalanced datasets.

Clinical prediction models often aim to predict rare, high-risk events, but building such models requires robust understanding of imbalance datasets and their unique study design considerations. This practical guide highlights foundational prediction model principles for surgeon-data scientists and readers who encounter clinical prediction models, from feature engineering and algorithm selection strategies to model evaluation and design techniques specific to imbalanced datasets. We walk through a clinical example using readable code to highlight important considerations and common pitfalls in developing machine learning-based prediction models. We hope this practical guide facilitates developing and critically appraising robust clinical prediction models for the surgical community.

Safety of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy performed by intensivists versus surgeons: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) is the preferred method for managing critically ill patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation. We aimed to compare the safety of PDT performed by intensivists versus surgeons. METHODS: This retrospective, single center, cohort study included all the patients who underwent PDT from 2014 to 2023. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust the imbalances of covariates between the groups. The primary outcome was the occurrence of early complications after PDT. Secondary outcomes were the development of late complications of PDT and mortality directly related to tracheostomy. RESULTS: 1685 consecutive patients with critical illness were included in the analysis. Of these, 1396 (82.8%) PDTs were performed by surgeons and 289 (17.2%) by intensivists with background residency training in internal medicine. Early complications were reported in 80 (5.7%) of the patients in the surgeon group and in 13 (4.5%) patients in the intensivist group (p = 0.40). Minor hemorrhage was the most common early complication. Secondary outcomes were comparable in both groups. In a propensity score-matched cohort, the findings remained consistent. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that PDT can be performed by intensivists, as well as surgeons, with the same safety profile. Our findings underscore the importance of incorporating PDT into the intensive care unit (ICU) training syllabus, ensuring the procedure is readily accessible with reliance on the expertise of ICU staff.

Clinical outcome of perioperative airway and ventilatory management in patients undergoing surgery for oral cavity cancer: a prospective observational study.

Objectives: This prospective observational study aimed to assess the clinical outcomes of perioperative airway and ventilatory management in patients undergoing surgery for oral cavity cancer. The study described the frequencies and types of procedures for securing the airway and the duration and types of postoperative ventilatory support. We compared the findings with those of the TRACHY study. Patients and Methods: One hundred patients undergoing oral cavity oncological surgeries were included. Airway assessment included inter-incisor gap, Mallampati class, neck movements, and radiological features. Surgical parameters, postoperative ventilatory support, and complications were documented. Results: The buccal mucosa was the most common cancer site (48.0%), and direct laryngoscopy was deemed difficult in 58.0% of patients. Awake fibreoptic intubation or elective tracheostomy was required in 43.0% of cases. Thirty-three patients were extubated on the table, and 34 patients were successfully managed with a delayed extubation strategy. In comparison with the TRACHY study, variations were observed in demographic parameters, tumour characteristics, and surgical interventions. Our mean TRACHY score was 1.38, and only five patients had a score ≥4. Prophylactic tracheostomy was performed in 2.0% of cases, in contrast to the TRACHY study in which 42.0% of patients underwent the procedure. Conclusion: The study emphasizes the challenges in airway management for oral cavity cancer surgery. While prophylactic tracheostomy may be necessary in specific cases, individualized approaches, including delayed extubation, are preferrable to maximize safety. Our findings contribute to better understanding and managing perioperative challenges in oral cancer patients and highlight the need for personalized strategies. Scoring systems like TRACHY should not be accepted as universally applicable.

Supporting Direct Breastfeeding for a Tracheostomy-Dependent Extremely Premature Infant: A Case Study.

INTRODUCTION: The benefits of human milk for preterm infants are well documented. Complex medical conditions can limit the extremely premature infant's ability to breastfeed and to receive human milk directly, yet these vulnerable infants may benefit most from receiving it. MAIN ISSUE: Extremely preterm infants are at risk for infections, digestive challenges, and chronic lung disease, and occasionally require a tracheostomy to facilitate weaning from mechanical ventilation. There is a risk of aspiration when orally feeding a child with a tracheostomy. This case study describes a tertiary neonatal team supporting a family's direct breastfeeding goal in an extremely premature infant with a diagnosis of bronchopulmonary dysplasia requiring a tracheostomy. MANAGEMENT: Initially, the infant participant (born at 24 weeks and 3 days of gestation, with a birthweight of 540 g) was gavage fed with human milk. The interdisciplinary team collaborated with the family to guide the infant's feeding goals, providing positive oral stimulation with soothers, oral immune therapy, and frequent skin-to-skin contact to prepare for future oral feeding. Within a month of the tracheotomy procedure, oral feeding was initiated, and direct breastfeeding with the tracheostomy tubing in place was achieved at 50 weeks and 1 day of age as a primary source of nutrition. CONCLUSION: The open dialogue between the family and healthcare team was the foundation for trialing direct breastfeeding for an extremely premature infant with a tracheostomy. While direct breastfeeding of full-term infants with tracheostomies has been previously described in the literature, this is the first case study of an extremely premature infant with a tracheostomy transitioning to direct breastfeeding.

Arterial Blood Gas Analysis in Patients with Stridor, and the Impact of Emergency Tracheostomy on It: A Tertiary Care Center Experience.

Comparative evaluation of arterial blood gas in patients with stridor, before and after emergency tracheostomy. The present prospective study was conducted in tertiary care Centre from February 2022 to June 2023 on 42 patients who presented with stridor and underwent emergency tracheostomy in our department. After proper history taking and clinical examination, nonsurgical cause of stridor was ruled out. Patients were then classified on the basis of location of cause of stridor (whether oropharyngeal, hypo-pharyngeal, supra-glottic, glottic or sub-glottic). Immediately an arterial blood gas (ABG) analysis was done, and emergency tracheostomy was performed. Following tracheostomy, ABG analysis was done immediately, after 12 h and after 24 h. The mean age of presentation of stridor in our study was 65.02 ± 3.23 years, with male preponderance (Male: female ratio being 3.66:1). Most common etiology of stridor in our study was glottic carcinoma comprising 50%, and least common etiology of stridor was hypopharyngeal carcinoma, and subglottic stenosis comprising 2.4% each. There was statistically significant normalization of ABG in terms of pH, PO2, PCO2, HCO3. Mean pH, PO2, PCO2, and HCO3 before tracheostomy were 7.31, 74.8, 60.6, and 29.8 respectively. Mean pH, PO2, PCO2, HCO3, immediately after tracheostomy were7.38, 91.3, 48.4, and 27.4 respectively. After 12 h of tracheostomy, mean pH, PO2, PCO2, HCO3 were 7.41, 95.4, 42.7, 25.3 respectively. Mean pH, PO2, PCO2, HCO3 24 h after emergency tracheostomy were 7.441, 95.5, 42.8, 24.6 respectively. Emergency tracheostomy in stridor patients improves the acid base and ventilatory status, by relieving the obstruction as evidenced by statistically significant improvement in arterial blood gas values, and can be used as a diagnostic tool in upper airway obstruction.