Dabrafenib plus trametinib versus anti-PD-1 monotherapy as adjuvant therapy in BRAF V600-mutant stage III melanoma after definitive surgery: a multicenter, retrospective cohort study.

Background: Both dabrafenib/trametinib (D/T) and anti-PD-1 monotherapy (PD-1) are approved adjuvant therapies for patients with stage III BRAF V600-mutant melanoma. However, there is still a lack of head-to-head comparative data. We aimed to describe efficacy and toxicity outcomes for these two standard therapies across melanoma centers. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective cohort study was conducted in 15 melanoma centers in Australia, China, Germany, Italy, Japan, UK, and US. We included adult patients with resected stage III BRAF V600-mutant melanoma who received either adjuvant D/T or PD-1 between Jul 2015 and Oct 2022. The primary endpoint was relapse-free survival (RFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), recurrence pattern and toxicity. Findings: We included 598 patients with stage III BRAF V600-mutant melanoma who received either adjuvant D/T (n = 393 [66%]) or PD-1 (n = 205 [34%]) post definitive surgery between Jul 2015 and Oct 2022. At a median follow-up of 33 months (IQR 21-43), the median RFS was 51.0 months (95% CI 41.0-not reached [NR]) in the D/T group, significantly longer than PD-1 (44.8 months [95% CI 28.5-NR]) (univariate: HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.50-0.87, P = 0.003; multivariate: HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.39-0.86, P = 0.007), with comparable OS with PD-1 (multivariate, HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.48-1.70, P = 0.75). Similar findings were observed using a restricted-mean-survival-time model. Among those who experienced recurrence, the proportion of distant metastases was higher in the D/T cohort. D/T had a higher incidence of treatment modification due to adverse events (AEs) than PD-1, but fewer persistent AEs. Interpretation: In patients with stage III BRAF V600-mutant melanoma post definitive surgery, D/T yielded better RFS than PD-1, with higher transient but lower persistent toxicity, and comparable OS. D/T seems to provide a better outcome compared with PD-1, but a longer follow-up and ideally a large prospective trial are needed. Funding: Dr. Xue Bai was supported by the Beijing Hospitals Authority Youth Programme (QMS20211101) for her efforts devoted to this study. Dr. Keith T. Flaherty was funded by Adelson Medical Research Foundation for the efforts devoted to this study.

Efficacy of dabrafenib/trametinib in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with BRAF NVTAP deletion: A case report.

Studies have been actively conducted to identify actionable mutations and incorporate them into clinical practice in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), which is known to have a poor prognosis with traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy. A BRAF point mutation in V600E is commonly reported in KRAS wild-type PDAC, and targeting BRAF_V600E is already being applied to various carcinomas, including PDAC. Accumulated evidence also shows that not only BRAF_V600E but also short in-frame deletions of BRAF have an oncogenic function. Here, we report that a patient with BRAF N486_P490 deletion initiated on dabrafenib or trametinib, a BRAF inhibitor, and a MEK inhibitor, respectively, after cytotoxic chemotherapy failure. The patient then presented with a partial response.

The meaning of screening: detection of brain metastasis in the adjuvant setting for stage III melanoma.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of melanoma is increasing and 37% of patients with metastatic melanoma eventually have brain metastasis (BM). Currently, there is no consensus on screening for BM in patients with resected stage III melanoma. However, given the high incidence of BM, routine screening magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain is considered in patients with completely resected stage III melanoma before the start of adjuvant treatment. The aim of this study was to assess the yield of screening for BM in these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-center cohort study was carried out in the Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, a large tertiary referral center for patients with melanoma. Eligible patients with complete resection of stage III melanoma and a screening MRI of the brain, made within 12 weeks after resection and before adjuvant treatment (programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitors, dabrafenib-trametinib), available between 1 August 2018 and 1 January 2021, were included. RESULTS: A total of 202 patients were included. Eighteen (8.9%) of 202 patients had extracranial metastasis at screening. Two (1.1%) of the remaining 184 patients had BM at screening, resulting in a switch from adjuvant treatment to ipilimumab-nivolumab. At a median follow-up of 21.2 months, BM was detected in another 4 (2.4%) of 166 patients who started with adjuvant treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The yield of screening MRI of the brain is low after complete resection of stage III melanoma, before the start of adjuvant treatment. Therefore, routine screening MRI is not recommended in this setting.

First-line pembrolizumab versus dabrafenib/trametinib treatment for BRAF V600-mutant advanced melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Limited data are available to assist the selection between immune checkpoint inhibitors and BRAF/mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase inhibitors as first-line treatment for patients with BRAF-mutant advanced malignant melanoma. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the outcomes associated with first-line pembrolizumab or dabrafenib/trametinib treatment for advanced melanoma with activating BRAF V600 mutation. METHODS: Data of patients with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma who were treated with first-line pembrolizumab (n = 40) or dabrafenib/trametinib (n = 32) were analyzed. Tumor response, progression-free survival, and overall survival were evaluated. Immune evasion accompanied with emerging resistance to BRAF/mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase inhibitors was assessed. RESULTS: A longer overall survival was observed after first-line pembrolizumab treatment than after first-line dabrafenib/trametinib treatment (hazard ratio = 2.910, 95% CI: 1.552-5.459), although there were no significant differences in progression-free survival (P = .375) and response rate (P = .123). Emergence of resistance to dabrafenib/trametinib co-occurred with immune evasion, enabling melanoma cells to escape recognition and killing by Melan-A-specific CD8+ T cells. LIMITATIONS: Analysis was conducted in a retrospective manner. CONCLUSION: Pembrolizumab may be recommended over BRAF/mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase inhibitors as the first-line treatment in patients with advanced BRAF V600-mutant melanoma.

Cost-effectiveness of adjuvant systemic therapies for patients with high-risk melanoma in Europe: a model-based economic evaluation.

BACKGROUND: The introduction of adjuvant systemic treatment has significantly improved recurrence-free survival in patients with resectable high-risk melanoma. Adjuvant treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy, however, substantially impacts health care budgets, while the number of patients with melanoma who are treated in the adjuvant setting is still increasing. To evaluate the socioeconomic impact of the three adjuvant treatments, a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) was carried out. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were obtained from the three pivotal registration phase III clinical trials on the adjuvant treatment of patients with resected high-risk stage III in melanoma (KEYNOTE-054, CheckMate 238, and COMBI-AD). For this CEA, a Markov model with three health states (no evidence of disease, recurrent/progressive disease, and death) was applied. From a societal perspective, different adjuvant strategies were compared according to total costs, life years (LYs), quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. To evaluate model uncertainty, sensitivity analyses (deterministic and probabilistic) were carried out. RESULTS: In the adjuvant setting, total costs (per patient) were €168 826 for nivolumab, €194 529 for pembrolizumab, and €211 110 for dabrafenib-trametinib. These costs were mainly determined by drug acquisition costs, whereas routine surveillance costs varied from €126 096 to €134 945. Compared with routine surveillance, LYs improved by approximately 1.41 for all therapies and QALYs improved by 2.02 for immune checkpoint inhibitors and 2.03 for targeted therapy. This resulted in incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of €21 153 (nivolumab), €33 878 (pembrolizumab), and €37 520 (dabrafenib-trametinib) per QALY gained. CONCLUSIONS: This CEA compared the three EMA-approved adjuvant systemic therapies for resected stage III melanoma. Adjuvant treatment with nivolumab was the most cost-effective, followed by pembrolizumab. Combination therapy with dabrafenib-trametinib was the least cost-effective. With the increasing number of patients with high-risk melanoma who will be treated with adjuvant treatment, there is an urgent need to reduce drug costs while developing better prognostic and predictive tools to identify patients who will benefit from adjuvant treatment.

Response to the Combination of Osimertinib, Dabrafenib, and Trametinib in Leptomeningitis From EGFR-Mutant NSCLC With Acquired BRAF V600E Mutation: A Case Report.

Molecular sequencing after highly potent targeted gene inhibitors have suggested resistant tumors can display substantial heterogeneity. Among these various mechanisms of resistance, secondary mutations on targetable oncogenes have been identified. BRAF V600E, as a bypass mechanism on disease progression while receiving osimertinib therapy, has been reported in 3% of EGFR-mutated patients. Few case reports described the efficacy of the association of osimertinib and dabrafenib plus trametinib. Here, we report, for the first time, a case of a patient treated with this association, with a prolonged response on leptomeningeal metastasis. We also provide a comprehensive overview of the available literature on the efficacy and tolerance of this association.

Treatment of hairy cell leukemia.

INTRODUCTION: Purine analogs made dramatic improvements for patients with hairy cell leukemia (HCL), but patients often relapse, require multiple treatments, and may become refractory. Major developments in treatment of relapsed/refractory HCL occurred with discovery of disease biology. New agents increase the complexity of clinical decision-making. AREAS COVERED: Anti-CD22 recombinant immunotoxin Moxetumomab Pasudotox (Moxe), CD20 Mabs rituximab and obinutuzumab, BRAF/MEK inhibitors vemurafenib and dabrafenib-trametinib, and Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor ibrutinib have been tested in HCL. All show efficacy but with different treatment durations and response rates, including for eradicating minimal residual disease (MRD). Side effects differ and must be considered when selecting treatment. Studies from PubMed indexed papers and abstracts presented at major international conferences are included. EXPERT OPINION: Rituximab with either purine analog or BRAF-inhibitor achieves high rates of MRD-free complete remission (CR). Moxe achieves MRD-free CR without chemotherapy toxicities. Moxe should be considered prior to splenectomy or development of adenopathy. BRAF/MEK inhibition and ibrutinib are effective options but most patients remain MRD+, requiring indefinite treatment or rituximab to prevent relapse. Under investigation is MRD elimination with CD20 antibody combined with Moxe or BRAF inhibitor. High-risk diseases including HCL variant and IGHV4-34+ unmutated HCL require further investigation.

Dabrafenib-trametinib combination in 'field-practice': an Italian experience.

AIM: This observational study investigates the effectiveness and safety of dabrafenib/trametinib combination in patients with metastatic melanoma. PATIENTS & METHODS: Seventy-six patients treated with dabrafenib/trametinib (150 mg twice daily/2 mg once daily) were included. RESULTS: Median progression-free survival was 9 months (95% CI: 7-11) and median overall survival was 14 months (11-16); disease control rate was 72%. Nine patients (12%) experienced a complete response. Of these, seven presented one metastatic site, none had lung or CNS metastasis, and none had elevated baseline lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels. Overall, subgroup analysis for patients with adverse prognostic features led to similar results. No new safety signals were reported. CONCLUSION: Dabrafenib/trametinib combination can be effective and well-tolerated also in a heterogeneous 'real life' population comprising patients with adverse prognostic features.