Nivolumab, Pomalidomide, and Elotuzumab Combination Regimens for Treatment of Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Results from the Phase 3 CheckMate 602 Study.

BACKGROUND: Preclinical studies suggest that combining nivolumab, a programmed death-1 (PD-1) immune checkpoint inhibitor, with pomalidomide/dexamethasone (Pd) with or without elotuzumab, an antisignaling lymphocytic activation molecule F7 monoclonal antibody, may improve multiple myeloma (MM) treatment efficacy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The phase 3 CheckMate 602 study (NCT02726581) assessed the efficacy and safety of nivolumab plus pomalidomide/dexamethasone (NPd) and NPd plus elotuzumab (NE-Pd). Eligible patients (aged ≥ 18 years) had measurable MM after ≥ 2 prior lines of therapy, that included an immunomodulatory drug (IMiD) and proteasome inhibitor (PI), each for ≥ 2 consecutive cycles, alone or combined, and were refractory to their last line of therapy. Patients were randomized 3:3:1 to receive NPd, Pd, or NE-Pd. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); overall response rate (ORR) was a key secondary endpoint. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 16.8 months, PFS was similar between treatment arms (Pd, 7.3 months [95% CI, 6.5-8.4]; NPd, 8.4 months [95% CI, 5.8-12.1]; NE-Pd, 6.3 months [95% CI, 2.4-11.1]). ORR was similar in the Pd (55%), NPd (48%), and NE-Pd (42%) arms. Nivolumab-containing arms were associated with a less favorable safety profile versus Pd, including a higher rate of thrombocytopenia (NPd, 25.0%; NE-Pd, 16.7%; Pd, 15.7%), any-grade immune-mediated adverse events (NPd, 13.9%; NE-Pd, 16.7%; Pd, 2.9%), and adverse events leading to discontinuation (NPd, 25.0%; NE-Pd, 33.3%; Pd, 18.6%). No new safety signals were identified. CONCLUSION: CheckMate 602 did not demonstrate clinical benefit of nivolumab (+/- elotuzumab) plus Pd versus Pd for patients with relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM).

Elotuzumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: Extended follow-up of a multicenter, retrospective real-world experience with 321 cases outside of controlled clinical trials.

The ELOQUENT-3 trial demonstrated the superiority of the combination of elotuzumab, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone (EloPd) in terms of efficacy and safety, compared to Pd in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), who had received at least two prior therapies, including lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor. The present study is an 18-month follow-up update of a previously published Italian real-life RRMM cohort of patients treated with EloPd. This revised analysis entered 319 RRMM patients accrued in 41 Italian centers. After a median follow-up of 17.7 months, 213 patients (66.4%) experienced disease progression or died. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 7.5 and 19.2 months, respectively. The updated multivariate analysis showed a significant reduction of PFS benefit magnitude both in advanced International Staging System (ISS) (II and III) stages and previous exposure to daratumumab cases. Instead, advanced ISS (II and III) stages and more than 2 previous lines of therapy maintained an independent prognostic impact on OS. Major adverse events included grade three-fourths neutropenia (24.9%), anemia (13.4%), lymphocytopenia (15.5%), and thrombocytopenia (10.7%), while infection rates and pneumonia were 19.3% and 8.7%, respectively. A slight increase in the incidence of neutropenia and lymphocytopenia was registered with longer follow-up. In conclusion, our real-world study still confirms that EloPd is a safe and possible therapeutic choice for RRMM. Nevertheless, novel strategies are desirable for those patients exposed to daratumumab.

Cytomegalovirus Reactivation during Elotuzumab Therapy in Patients with Multiple Myeloma.

INTRODUCTION: Some treatments are associated with cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation (CMVRA) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). However, no reports exist on the association between elotuzumab and CMVRA. Therefore, we assessed the incidence of CMVRA in patients with MM who received elotuzumab therapy. METHODS: The medical records of 85 patients who underwent elotuzumab therapy were included in the retrospective analysis for CMV positivity. RESULTS: Thirty patients were tested for CMV antigenemia during elotuzumab therapy, and 16 were positive for CMV antigenemia; the cumulative incidence rate of CMVRA 6 months after elotuzumab initiation was 18.4%. The history of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) was significantly more common in the CMVRA group (31.2%) than that of the group without CMVRA (8.7%). However, even among patients who did not undergo allo-HSCT, the cumulative incidence rate of CMVRA at 6 months was 15.1%. During CMVRA, the symptoms included fever in 8 cases, while retinitis was observed in 1 case. Five patients required antiviral therapy and CMV antigenemia resolved in all but 1 case. CONCLUSION: Although the patient population was heterogeneous, CMVRA cannot be underestimated during elotuzumab therapy, and evaluation of CMVRA, especially in symptomatic cases, is clinically important.

Daratumumab­resistant multiple myeloma with extramedullary disease successfully treated with combination elotuzumab, pomalidomide and dexamethasone: A case report.

Despite the emergence of monoclonal antibodies, the prognosis of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) with extramedullary disease remains poor. The present report describes a rare case of daratumumab-refractory MM that was successfully treated with elotuzumab, pomalidomide and dexamethasone. A 66-year-old male patient diagnosed with MM was treated with bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone, followed by high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation. Thereafter, the patient was treated with lenalidomide and dexamethasone as maintenance therapy. This was changed to daratumumab, bortezomib and dexamethasone when new paraskeletal lesions were identified, resulting in marked tumor shrinkage. After 15 months, an increase in serum monoclonal protein levels, development of a skeletal lesion in the right second rib and extramedullary disease of the right thoracic mediastinal lymph nodes were noted. Treatment with elotuzumab, pomalidomide and dexamethasone (EPd) resulted in expeditious symptomatic improvement and regression of the lesions. Notably, during daratumumab, bortezomib and dexamethasone treatment, lymphocyte counts gradually increased to a level at which elotuzumab was sufficiently effective. EPd might be a promising strategy for the treatment of patients with relapsed extramedullary MM while on daratumumab treatment.

Efficacy of elotuzumab for multiple myeloma deteriorates after daratumumab: a multicenter retrospective study.

Elotuzumab-based regimens are sometimes selected for multiple myeloma treatment after daratumumab-based regimens. However, there has been insufficient discussion on the efficacy of elotuzumab after daratumumab. We used Kansai Myeloma Forum registration data in a multicenter retrospective evaluation of the efficacy of elotuzumab after daratumumab. Overall survival (OS) rate and time to next treatment (TTNT) were significantly worse in the cohort given elotuzumab after daratumumab (Dara cohort, n = 47) than in the cohort with no history of daratumumab administration before elotuzumab (No-Dara cohort, n = 80, OS: P = 0.03; TTNT: P = 0.02; best response: P < 0.01). In the Dara cohort, OS and TTNT rates were worse with sequential elotuzumab use after daratumumab than with non-sequential (OS: P = 0.02; TTNT: P = 0.03). In patients given elotuzumab < 180 days after daratumumab, OS (P = 0.08) and best response (P = 0.21) tended to be worse, and TTNT was significantly worse (P = 0.01), than in those given elotuzumab after ≥ 180 days. These findings were confirmed by subgroup analyses and multivariate analyses. Monoclonal-antibody-free treatment might be preferable after daratumumab-based regimens. If possible, elotuzumab-based regimens should be considered only ≥ 180 days after daratumumab use.

NK and T-lymphocyte Kinetics Predict Outcome in Myeloma Patients Treated With Elotuzumab, Lenalidomide Plus Dexamethasone.

Background/Aim: Elotuzumab, an anti-SLAMF7 monoclonal antibody, can enhance immune activity via elevated antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and reduced SLAMF7+CD8+CD57+ regulatory T-cells (Tregs). This multicenter observational study investigated the kinetics of lymphocytes in myeloma patients treated with elotuzumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (ERd) by two-color flow cytometry using peripheral blood samples. Patients and Methods: Twenty-one patients were included in this study. The median duration of ERd was 22.6 months, and the cutoff time for long-duration ERd was two years. Results: The CD2+CD16+ and CD16+CD57- NK cells were significantly increased over time in the long-duration ERd group compared to those in the short-duration ERd group (p=0.035 and p<0.001). The CD8+ and CD16-CD57+ lymphocytes, identified as low-activity NK cells or SLAMF7+ Tregs, were significantly increased in the patients whose ERd outcome was progressive disease (PD) compared to those in the non-PD group (p=0.023 and p<0.001). The mean CD4/CD8 ratio and CD19+ lymphocyte counts in the long-duration ERd group were significantly lower than those in the short-duration ERd group, although the kinetics of them did not change over time (p=0.016 and p=0.011). When the cutoff value of CD4/CD8 ratio was 0.792 according to ROC curves, the two-year time to next treatment (TTNT) in the low CD4/CD8 group was significantly longer than that in the high CD4/CD8 group (80.0% vs. 15.0%, p=0.024). Conclusion: The change in NK cells and CD8+ Tregs predicted long-duration ERd and PD, and maintaining low CD4/8 ratio predicted long TTNT, suggesting that these lymphocyte fractions might be biomarkers for a durable therapeutic effect of ERd in myeloma patients.

Safety and Effectiveness of Elotuzumab in Japanese Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Post-marketing Surveillance Study.

Objective Elotuzumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (ELd) was approved in Japan in 2016 for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). This post-marketing surveillance study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of ELd in RRMM patients during routine clinical practice in Japan. Methods Elotuzumab safety was assessed by evaluating adverse drug reactions (ADRs), and effectiveness was assessed primarily by the best overall response. Patients The study enrolled patients with RRMM who received ELd therapy between November 18, 2016, and June 18, 2017. The safety and effectiveness analysis sets included 831 and 755 patients, respectively. Results In the safety analysis set, patients received a median (range) of 12 (1-40) elotuzumab administrations over 108 (1-728) days of treatment. The relative dose intensity of elotuzumab was ≥90% in 74.1% of patients. ADRs and serious ADRs were reported in 41.2% and 15.2% of the patients, respectively. The most common ADR was infection (12.0%), followed by lymphocytopenia (10.1%), infusion reactions (7.5%), secondary malignancies (e.g. gastric cancer and pancreatic carcinoma), cataracts, and interstitial lung disease (0.2% each). While most patients with ADRs recovered, 71 discontinued treatment, and 14 deaths were reported. The presence of comorbidities, particularly cardiovascular disorders, significantly affected the safety. The overall response rate was 41.1%. Conclusion This all-case post-marketing surveillance study showed that ELd had an acceptable tolerability profile and promising clinical activity in Japanese patients with RRMM.

Elotuzumab: Empiric analysis of dexamethasone administration schedule.

Elotuzumab in combination with dexamethasone and immunomodulating agents (IMiDs) lenalidomide or pomalidomide is 2nd to 4th line therapy for multiple myeloma. The labelled dosage of dexamethasone for use in conjunction with elotuzumab and IMiDs splits the dexamethasone dose into two administrations, one oral and one intravenous, on the days of each elotuzumab infusion. Administration of split dose dexamethasone on days of elotuzumab administration is based on the registration trials submitted for drug approval and was intended to ensure standard well-timed immunotherapy premedication using pharmacologically equivalent dexamethasone doses for both study arms. Administration of dexamethasone in the manner delineated by the elotuzumab product label adds complexity to the delivery of care. This commentary provides an empirical assessment of established medication safety and effectiveness which supports administration of dexamethasone standard intermittent dose instead of the split dose approach delineated on elotuzumab package insert. Simplification of regimen administration improves medication adherence, reduces the risk of inadvertent omission or duplication of medication therapy, and improves the workflow required for delivery of care.

Monoclonal Antibodies in the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma.

The incorporation of monoclonal antibodies into backbone regimens has substantially improved the clinical outcomes of patients with newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Although the SLAMF7-targeting antibody elotuzumab has no single- agent activity, there is clinical synergy between elotuzumab and immunomodulatory drugs in patients with relapsed/refractory disease. Daratumumab and isatuximab are CD38-targeting antibodies which have single-agent activity and a favorable safety profile, which make these agents an attractive component of combination regimens. Monoclonal antibodies may cause infusion-related reactions, but with subcutaneous administration these are less frequently observed. All therapeutic antibodies may interfere with assessment of complete response. Next-generation Fc-engineered monoclonal antibodies are in development with the potential to further improve the outcome of patients with MM.

Real-World Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Multiple Myeloma Administered With Elotuzumab-Based Treatment.

Objective Elotuzumab is used to treat relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (MM). However, the optimal patient selection and sequencing in MM therapy are less clear. Therefore, this retrospective cohort study assessed the clinical outcomes of patients with MM who underwent elotuzumab-based therapy. Methods We reviewed the medical records of 85 patients with relapsed/refractory MM who received elotuzumab for the first time. Participants were divided into progressive disease (PD group) and those without PD (non-PD group) at elotuzumab treatment initiation, and each group was analyzed separately. Survival rates were calculated using Kaplan-Meier curves and compared using log-rank tests. Results The median follow-up period was 33.6 (range: 0.5-72.0) months. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of PD and non-PD groups at elotuzumab therapy initiation were 5.3 months and not reached (NR), respectively (P < 0.0001), and 26.8 months and NR, respectively. Patients with triple-class refractory disease in both groups had worse PFS and OS. Twenty-one patients in the non-PD group received elotuzumab as post-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, whose PFS and OS were NR (95% CI, 21.4 months-NR) and NR (95% CI, NR-NR), respectively. Conclusions Elotuzumab exhibited limited therapeutic efficacy in patients with triple-class refractory MM but better treatment outcomes in situations with adequate disease control and post-transplant treatment.

Stem cell collection after lenalidomide, bortezomib and dexamethasone plus elotuzumab or isatuximab in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients: a single centre experience from the GMMG-HD6 and -HD7 trials.

BACKGROUND: While quadruplet induction therapies deepen responses in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients, their impact on peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection remains incompletely understood. This analysis aims to evaluate the effects of prolonged lenalidomide induction and isatuximab- or elotuzumab-containing quadruplet induction therapies on PBSC mobilization and collection. METHODS: A total of 179 transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed MM treated at a single academic center were included. The patients were evaluated based on PBSC mobilization and collection parameters, including overall collection results, CD34+ cell levels in peripheral blood, leukapheresis (LP) delays, overall number of LP sessions, and the rate of rescue mobilization with plerixafor. The patients underwent four different induction regimens: Lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (RVd, six 21-day cycles, n = 44), isatuximab-RVd (six 21-day cycles, n = 35), RVd (four 21-day cycles, n = 51), or elotuzumab-RVd (four 21-day cycles, n = 49). RESULTS: The patients' characteristics were well balanced across the different groups. Collection failures, defined as the inability to collect three sufficient PBSC transplants, were rare (n = 3, 2%), with no occurrences in the isatuximab-RVd and elotuzumab-RVd groups. Intensified induction with six 21-day cycles of RVd did not negatively impact the overall number of collected PBSCs (9.7 × 106/kg bw versus 10.5 × 106/kg bw, p = 0.331) compared to four 21-day cycles of RVd. Plerixafor usage was more common after six cycles of RVd compared to four cycles (16% versus 8%). Addition of elotuzumab to RVd did not adversely affect overall PBSC collection (10.9 × 106/kg bw versus 10.5 × 106/kg bw, p = 0.915). Patients treated with isatuximab-RVd (six cycles) had lower numbers of collected stem cells compared to those receiving RVd (six cycles) induction (8.8 × 106/kg bw versus 9.7 × 106/kg bw, p = 0.801), without experiencing significant delays in LP or increased numbers of LP sessions in a multivariable logistic regression analysis. Plerixafor usage was more common after isatuximab plus RVd compared to RVd alone (34% versus 16%). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that stem cell collection is feasible after prolonged induction with isatuximab-RVd without collection failures and might be further explored as induction therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Patients were treated within the randomized phase III clinical trials GMMG-HD6 (NCT02495922, 24/06/2015) and GMMG-HD7 (NCT03617731, 24/07/2018). However, during stem cell mobilization and -collection, no study-specific therapeutic intervention was performed.

Continuous Elotuzumab, Pomalidomide, and Dexamethasone Maintenance Following Second Autologous Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma: Results of a Prospective Phase 2 Multicenter Trial.

Second autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT2) is a useful therapeutic modality for fit patients with multiple myeloma who have durable remission after upfront AHCT. Retrospective studies have suggested a significant benefit of incorporating maintenance therapy post-AHCT2, but prospective data on specific regimens are lacking. The purpose of this study was to investigate the use of elotuzumab, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone (EPd) as salvage therapy prior to and maintenance after AHCT2 for relapsed multiple myeloma. This prospective single-arm phase II trial investigating the use of EPd in combination with AHCT2 in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma was conducted at 2 academic centers in North America. The primary outcome was 1-year progression-free survival (PFS). Twenty-five patients were enrolled on the study. Sixteen patients received EPd induction; six patients (38%) progressed during salvage therapy and were removed from the trial prior to AHCT2. Following a planned safety analysis, the protocol was amended, and EPd induction was removed from the study schema. An additional 9 patients underwent induction off-study and were enrolled on trial for AHCT2 and EPd maintenance. A total of 18 patients underwent AHCT2 and received EPd maintenance. Two patients discontinued treatment because of toxicity, one attributed to elotuzumab and the other to pomalidomide. The 1-year PFS was 72%, and the median PFS was 19 months. The study was closed early owing to poor accrual; 6 patients remained on therapy at time of analysis. EPd maintenance after AHCT2 was safe and tolerable. The 1-year PFS and median PFS were similar to values in previous retrospective reports of outcomes following AHCT2. Further studies are needed to define the optimal use of and protocol for AHCT2 in fit patients with relapsed multiple myeloma.

SLAMF7 as a Promising Immunotherapeutic Target in Multiple Myeloma Treatments.

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a common hematological malignancy that has fostered several new therapeutic approaches to combat newly diagnosed or relapsed MM. While the field has advanced over the past 2 decades, the majority of patients will develop resistance to these treatments, causing the need for new therapeutic targets. SLAMF7 is an attractive therapeutic target in multiple myeloma, and a monoclonal antibody that targets SLAMF7 has shown consistent beneficial outcomes in clinical trials to date. In this review, we will focus on the structure and regulation of SLAMF7 and its mechanism of action. The most recent clinical trials will be reviewed to further understand the clinical implications and improve the prognosis of MM. Furthermore, the efficacy of anti-SLAMF7 monoclonal antibodies combined with standard therapies and possible resistance mechanisms will be discussed. This review aimed to provide a detailed summary of the role of SLAMF7 in the pathogenesis of patients with MM and the rationale for further investigation into SLAMF7-mediated molecular pathways associated with MM development.

SLAM-family receptors come of age as a potential molecular target in cancer immunotherapy.

The signaling lymphocytic activation molecule (SLAM) family receptors were discovered in immune cells for the first time. The SLAM-family receptors are a significant player in cytotoxicity, humoral immune responses, autoimmune diseases, lymphocyte development, cell survival, and cell adhesion. There is growing evidence that SLAM-family receptors have been involved in cancer progression and heralded as a novel immune checkpoint on T cells. Previous studies have reported the role of SLAMs in tumor immunity in various cancers, including chronic lymphocytic leukemia, lymphoma, multiple myeloma, acute myeloid leukemia, hepatocellular carcinoma, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, pancreas, lung, and melanoma. Evidence has deciphered that the SLAM-family receptors may be targeted for cancer immunotherapy. However, our understanding in this regard is not complete. This review will discuss the role of SLAM-family receptors in cancer immunotherapy. It will also provide an update on recent advances in SLAM-based targeted immunotherapies.

Safety and efficacy of Elotuzumab combination therapy for patients with multiple myeloma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: We evaluate the efficacy and safety of Elotuzumab, an immunostimulatory monoclonal antibody, in combination with concomitant treatment regimens for multiple myeloma (MM) patients. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and EMBASE databases were searched systematically up to 2 August 2022. RESULTS: Five randomized control trials with a total of 1,763 participants were included. Elotuzumab combination therapy improved PFS and OS by 14% (hazard ratio [HR] 0.86) and 20% (HR 0.80), respectively, relative to the non-Elotuzumab regimen. Adding Elotuzumab to Lenalidomide plus Dexamethasone regimen (HR 0.82) or Pomalidomide plus Dexamethasone regimen (HR 0.54) were considered to improve the PFS. Meanwhile, the risk of disease progression was only reduced for patients with relapsed/refractory MM (HR 0.70) but not for newly diagnosed/untreated MM (HR 0.93). Finally, the risk of serious adverse events (RR 1.12) and the risk of infection (RR 1.09) and cardiac disorders (RR 1.32) were higher for the experimental group compared to the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings showed that Elotuzumab combination therapy prolonged OS and PFS compared to non-Elotuzumab treatments in patients with MM. However, further investigations are required to establish the most effective combination of the Elotuzumab regimen.

Once Monthly Elotuzumab and Lenalidomide Plus Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma: A Multicenter Observation Study.

INTRODUCTION: Elotuzumab and lenalidomide plus dexamethasone (ERd) is a standard salvage chemotherapy for multiple myeloma, and elotuzumab is commonly administered every 2 weeks after cycle 3 (conventional ERd). Alternatively, elotuzumab may often be used every 4 weeks (monthly ERd) in real-world practice. The purpose of this multicenter observational study was to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of monthly ERd. METHODS: We investigated the efficacy and tolerability between conventional and monthly ERd regimens for the myeloma patients in six institutes retrospectively. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients were included in this study. The median patient age was 68 years. The median number of prior chemotherapies was two (1-5). The number of patients with prior lenalidomide exposure was 57 (76.0%). The numbers of progressive disease (PD) and non-PD before ERd were 23 (30.7%) and 52 (69.3%), respectively. The frequency of PD before ERd was significantly lower in the monthly ERd group than in the conventional ERd group. In 26.9 months of median follow-up period, the 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate in the monthly ERd group was significantly longer than that in the conventional ERd group (95.0% and 62.0%, hazard ratio 0.082, p = 0.002). However, no significant difference in PFS between these two ERd groups was found using multivariate analysis. The complete response rates were similar between the monthly and conventional ERd groups (55.0% and 32.7%, p = 0.109). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events between the monthly and conventional ERd groups (35.0% and 54.5%, p = 0.192). There was no significant difference in the kinetics of the mean absolute lymphocyte count, CD4, CD8, CD16, CD56, and CD57 positive lymphocyte counts, and CD4 to CD8 ratio between the monthly and conventional ERd groups. DISCUSSION: The efficacy and tolerability of monthly ERd were similar to those of conventional ERd. Thus, monthly ERd might be a reasonable option, considering the quality of life of patients and convenience.

Early Intervention With a Curative Intent Through an Intensive Therapy Versus Immunologic Disease Control Using a Minimal Intensity Approach in the Management of High-risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma: A Systematic Review of Evidence From Clinical Trials.

A subset of individuals with smoldering myeloma (SMM) are at a high risk of progression to symptomatic myeloma. Current efforts are focused on identifying this high-risk group and intercepting the disease process before its progression. There is no consensus on what the goal of an intervention should be, whether to aim for a cure through a high-intensity intervention or pursue immunologic disease control using the least intense approach. This systematic review summarized current evidence in support of the optimum approach. A database search of Medline/PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, CINAHL, Wiley Cochrane Library, clinicaltrials.gov, and conference proceedings of ASH, EHA, ASCO, ESMO was performed. Results were presented using narrative synthesis of quantitative data. Of the 2088 identified records, a total of 10 eligible studies made up of 6 minimal-intensity clinical trials, 3 moderate-intensity trials, and 1 high-intensity trial were included in this review with a total demographic population of 588 high-risk SMM patients. Minimal intensity lenalidomide-based regimen demonstrated clinical effectiveness in delaying disease progression and improving overall survival in high-risk SMM. The single-agent monoclonal antibodies did not have any major impact on improving overall survival, although the studies were not powered to do so. There is a marked increase in the depth of response as the intensity of treatment increases without a proportional improvement in overall survival. Moderate- and high-intensity interventions yielded similar minimal residual disease negativity rates and overall survival. The minimal, moderate, and high-intensity approaches all demonstrated clinical benefits in delaying disease progression and improving overall survival in patients with high-risk SMM and increasing intensity of intervention does not necessarily translate to improved overall survival.

Cardiovascular complications of modern multiple myeloma therapy: A pharmacovigilance study.

AIMS: Multiple myeloma accounts for over 10-15% of haematological malignancies. Continued molecular advances have resulted in the development of new drugs for treatment of multiple myeloma. Four drugs were approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2015, but their safety is not well defined. The aim of this study is to delineate the cardiovascular adverse events of these drugs. METHODS: We reviewed the adverse cardiac events of newly approved FDA drugs since 2015 using the US FDA Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS) database. We calculated the reporting odds ratio (ROR) with 95% confidence interval (CIs) for the drugs that have the highest incidence of cardiovascular adverse events. RESULTS: Among the medications that have approved for multiple myeloma between 2015 and 2020, 4 novel drugs showed the highest incidence of cardiotoxicity. ROR (95% CI) for atrial fibrillation due to elotuzumab, ixazomib, daratumumab and panobinostat compared to other FAERS drugs was 5.8 (4.4-7.7), 1.9 (1.5-2.3), 4.8 (4.2-5.6) and 5.7 (4.1-8.1), respectively. The ROR (95% CI) for cardiac failure was 8.2 (6.4-10.5), 4.7 (4.1-5.4), 5.8 (4.9-6.7) and 5.6 (3.8-8.1) and ROR (95% CI) for coronary disease was 2.7 (1.9-3.9), 2.7 (2.3-3.2), 2.3 (1.9-2.8) and 4.6 (3.2-6.6) due to elotuzumab, ixazomib, daratumumab and panobinostat compared to all other drugs in FAERS. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrated that certain newly approved antimyeloma therapies are significantly associated with previously unknown cardiotoxicity. These results warrant further studies and highlight the importance of considering the cardiac history of patients with multiple myeloma when utilizing these novel agents.

Survival Risk Scores for Real-Life Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Patients Receiving Elotuzumab or Carfilzomib In Combination With Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone as Salvage Therapy: Analysis of 919 Cases Outside Clinical Trials.

The present study aimed to develop two survival risk scores (RS) for overall survival (OS, SRS KRd/EloRd ) and progression-free survival (PFS, PRS KRd/EloRd ) in 919 relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients who received carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (KRd)/elotuzumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (EloRd). The median OS was 35.4 months, with no significant difference between the KRd arm versus the EloRd arm. In the multivariate analysis, advanced ISS (HR = 1.31; P = 0.025), interval diagnosis-therapy (HR = 1.46; P = 0.001), number of previous lines of therapies (HR = 1.96; P < 0.0001), older age (HR = 1.72; P < 0.0001), and prior lenalidomide exposure (HR = 1.30; P = 0.026) remained independently associated with death. The median PFS was 20.3 months, with no difference between the two strategies. The multivariate model identified a significant progression/death risk increase for ISS III (HR = 1.37; P = 0.002), >3 previous lines of therapies (HR = 1.67; P < 0.0001), older age (HR = 1.64; P < 0.0001), and prior lenalidomide exposure (HR = 1.35; P = 0.003). Three risk SRS KRd/EloRd categories were generated: low-risk (134 cases, 16.5%), intermediate-risk (467 cases, 57.3%), and high-risk categories (213 cases, 26.2%). The 1- and 2-year OS probability rates were 92.3% and 83.8% for the low-risk (HR = 1, reference category), 81.1% and 60.6% (HR = 2.73; P < 0.0001) for the intermediate-risk, and 65.5% and 42.5% (HR = 4.91; P < 0.0001) for the high-risk groups, respectively. Notably, unlike the low-risk group, which did not cross the median timeline, the OS median values were 36.6 and 18.6 months for the intermediate- and high-risk cases, respectively. Similarly, three PRS KRd/EloRd risk categories were engendered. Based on such grouping, 338 (41.5%) cases were allocated in the low-, 248 (30.5%) in the intermediate-, and 228 (28.0%) in the high-risk groups. The 1- and 2-year PFS probability rates were 71.4% and 54.5% for the low-risk (HR = 1, reference category), 68.9% and 43.7% (HR = 1.95; P < 0.0001) for the intermediate-risk, and 48.0% and 27.1% (HR = 3.73; P < 0.0001) for the high-risk groups, respectively. The PFS median values were 29.0, 21.0, and 11.7 months for the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk cases. This analysis showed 2.7- and 4.9-fold increased risk of death for the intermediate- and high-risk cases treated with KRd/EloRd as salvage therapy. The combined progression/death risks of the two categories were increased 1.3- and 2.2-fold compared to the low-risk group. In conclusion, SRS KRd/EloRd and PRS KRd/EloRd may represent accessible and globally applicable models in daily clinical practice and ultimately represent a prognostic tool for RRMM patients who received KRd or EloRd.