Proceedings of the United Kingdom Periprosthetic Joint Infection Meeting 2022: Fracture-Related Infection Session.

Implant-related infections represent a relatively common and significant challenge in the surgical management of musculoskeletal trauma patients. The third United Kingdom Periprosthetic Joint Infection (UK PJI) Meeting convened in Glasgow on 1 April 2022, and brought together over 180 delegates, representing orthopaedics, infectious diseases, microbiology, plastic surgery, anaesthetics, and allied health professions, including pharmacy and specialist nurses. The meeting comprised a plenary session for all delegates, and separate breakout sessions for fracture-related infection (FRI) and arthroplasty. The UK PJI working group prepared consensus statements in advance of each session, based upon topics that were discussed at previous meetings, and delegates engaged in an anonymous electronic voting process. This article presents the findings of the FRI session, and examines each consensus topic within the context of the contemporary literature.

The FRI classification - A new classification of fracture-related infections.

AIM: To identify the most relevant factors with respect to the management of fracture-related infection (FRI) and to develop a comprehensive FRI classification that guides decision-making and allows scientific comparison. METHOD: An international group of FRI experts determined the preconditions, purpose, primary factors for inclusion, format and detailed description of the elements of an FRI classification through a consensus driven process. RESULTS: Three major elements were identified and grouped together in the FRI Classification: Fracture (F), Related patient factors (R) and Impairment of soft tissues (I). Each element was divided into five levels of complexity. Fractures can be healed (F1) or unhealed (F2-5). Patients may be fully healthy (R1) or have 4 levels of compromise, with and without end-organ damage (R2-5). Soft tissue condition ranges from well vascularized and easily closed (I1) to major skin defects requiring free flaps (I4). In all three elements, the fifth level (F5, R5 or I5) describes a patient who has an unreconstructible bone, soft tissue envelope or is not fit for surgery. CONCLUSION: The FRI classification, which is based on the three major elements Fracture (F), Related patient factors (R) and Impairment of soft tissues (I) is intended to guide decision-making and improve the quality of scientific reporting for FRIs in the future. The proposed classification is based on expert opinion and therefore an essential next step is clinical validation, in order to realize the ultimate goal of improving outcomes in the management of FRI.

Fracture-Related Infection of the Lower Limb Caused by Mucor velutinosus: Amputation or Salvation?

Fracture-related infections caused by mucormycosis are rare and potentially fatal. Evidence-based experience with its treatment is limited, and surgical management ranges from limb salvage to amputation, with indications not always clear. A 56-year-old woman was admitted after an aircraft accident, sustaining major trauma injuries, including a Gustilo-Anderson type III open ankle joint fracture. Initial damage control surgery with external fixation ensued, followed by secondary, definitive internal fixation with plate and screws. The patient developed a fracture-related infection in the ankle caused by Mucor velutinosus. Despite its invasive growth and tenacity, surgical debridement combined with systemic and local antifungal therapy led to remission in this immunocompetent patient. The ankle arthrodesis achieved bone union with a hexapod fixator 10 months post-trauma. In the treatment of opportunistic invasive mucormycosis, a multidisciplinary approach is necessary, especially in patients suffering major trauma injuries. Through apt diagnosis and thorough treatment by experienced surgeons, infectiologists, and pathologists, successful limb salvage may be attained in patients with an otherwise intact immune system, and amputation can be prevented.

Local Antimicrobial Therapy with Combined Aminoglycoside and Vancomycin Compared to Aminoglycoside Monotherapy in the Surgical Management of Osteomyelitis and Fracture-Related Infection.

We investigated the effect of combination aminoglycoside and vancomycin local antibiotic treatment compared to aminoglycoside alone in the surgical management of bone infection. Data including patient demographics, type of surgery, microbiological characteristics, BACH score, duration of antibiotic treatment and clinical outcomes were collected. Failure of therapy was a composite of recurrence of infection, continued or new antimicrobial therapy, or reoperation with suspected or confirmed infection at one year after index surgery. A total of 266 patients met the inclusion criteria. 252 patients reached the final follow-up and were included in the final analysis. 113 patients had treatment with aminoglycoside alone and 139 patients had combination aminoglycoside and vancomycin. There was no difference in the failure rate between groups; 10/113 (8.8%) in the aminoglycoside alone and 12/139 (8.6%) in the combination group, p = 0.934. Multivariate analysis showed that there was no added benefit of combination therapy (OR 1.54: 95% CI 0.59-4.04, p = 0.38). BACH score and low BMI were associated with increased risk of failure (BACH OR 3.49: 95% CI 1.13-10.76, p = 0.03; Low BMI OR 0.91: 95% CI 0.84-0.99, p = 0.037). The form of the carrier material (pellets or injectable paste) had no effect on failure rate (p = 0.163). The presence of aminoglycoside resistance had no effect on failure rate (OR 0.39: 95% CI 0.05-3.01, p = 0.37). Clinical outcome was not improved by the addition of vancomycin to aminoglycoside alone as local therapy for the management of bone infection.

Early Management for Fracture-Related Infection: A Literature Review.

Fracture-related infections (FRIs), as shown in the literature, represent one of the main complications of trauma surgery. They are a consequence of an implant-related "biofilm" formation and are a challenge for surgeons, microbiologists, and infectious disease specialists. For a correct diagnosis, careful clinical evaluation, to look for signs/symptoms attributable to an infectious condition, and instrumental examinations, to highlight the site of infection, its extent, and its severity, are both essential. Unfortunately, due to the lack of data in the literature, there is no consensus about guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of FRIs. The purpose of this study is to present an up-to-date concept evaluation of the diagnostic procedures and treatment options available in the management of fracture-related infections.

Role of bone single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography in managing chronic fracture-related infections: Determining the depth of infection and avoiding unnecessary bone procedures.

PURPOSE: Fracture-related infections (FRIs) encompass a broad range of infections associated with bone fractures; they remain a significant clinical challenge. Here, we aimed to investigate the viability of focusing on soft-tissue management in patients suspected of chronic FRI, who exhibit no significant bony uptake on bone single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/computed tomography (CT) scans. METHODS: Between January 2016 and January 2022, we managed 25 patients with chronic FRI or post-traumatic osteomyelitis using technetium 99m-methyl diphosphonate bone SPECT/CT to assess infection depth. Among them, 13 patients showing negligible bony uptake were included and categorized into two groups based on wound discharge reaching the bone/implant (Criteria 1, n = 6) or not (Criteria 2, n = 7). RESULTS: Patients in the Criteria 1 group were treated with antibiotics and soft tissue debridement without bony procedure. The average duration of antibiotic therapy was 6.7 weeks. Treatments were individualized, including implant changes, local flaps, skin grafts, and negative pressure wound therapy. No recurrence was reported in the mean follow-up of 21.3 months. Patients in the Criteria 2 group were treated with oral antibiotics (mean duration: 5.9 weeks) and daily wound dressings. No recurrence was reported in the mean follow-up of 26.0 months, and no surgical interventions were required. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the feasibility of focusing on soft-tissue management in patients with chronic FRI showing minimal bony uptake on bone SPECT/CT. Our treatment protocol avoided unnecessary surgical bone procedures, resulting in successful clinical outcomes with no recurrences.

Impact of Perioperative Dexamethasone Administration on Infection and Implant Osseointegration in a Preclinical Model of Orthopedic Device-Related Infection.

Glucocorticoids may be given prior to major orthopedic surgery to decrease postoperative nausea, vomiting, and pain. Additionally, many orthopedic patients may be on chronic glucocorticoid therapy. The aim of our study was to investigate whether glucocorticoid administration influences Orthopedic-Device-Related Infection (ODRI) in a rat model. Screws colonized with Staphylococcus epidermidis were implanted in the tibia of skeletally mature female Wistar rats. The treated groups received either a single shot of dexamethasone in a short-term risk study, or a daily dose of dexamethasone in a longer-term interference study. In both phases, bone changes in the vicinity of the implant were monitored with microCT. There were no statistically significant differences in bacteriological outcome with or without dexamethasone. In the interference study, new bone formation was statistically higher in the dexamethasone-treated group (p = 0.0005) as revealed by CT and histopathological analysis, although with relatively low direct osseointegration of the implant. In conclusion, dexamethasone does not increase the risk of developing periprosthetic osteolysis or infection in a pre-clinical model of ODRI. Long-term administration of dexamethasone seemed to offer a benefit in terms of new bone formation around the implant, but with low osseointegration.

Multisite Study of the Management of Musculoskeletal Infection After Trauma: The MMUSKIT Study.

Background: The optimal duration and choice of antibiotic for fracture-related infection (FRI) is not well defined. This study aimed to determine whether antibiotic duration (≤6 vs >6 weeks) is associated with infection- and surgery-free survival. The secondary aim was to ascertain risk factors associated with surgery- and infection-free survival. Methods: We performed a multicenter retrospective study of patients diagnosed with FRI between 2013 and 2022. The association between antibiotic duration and surgery- and infection-free survival was assessed by Cox proportional hazard models. Models were weighted by the inverse of the propensity score, calculated with a priori variables of hardware removal; infection due to Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus lugdunensis, Pseudomonas or Candida species; and flap coverage. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were run with additional covariates including initial pathogen, need for flap, and hardware removal. Results: Of 96 patients, 54 (56.3%) received ≤6 weeks of antibiotics and 42 (43.7%) received >6 weeks. There was no association between longer antibiotic duration and surgery-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.95; 95% CI, .65-1.38; P = .78) or infection-free survival (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, .30-1.96; P = .58). Negative culture was associated with increased hazard of reoperation or death (HR, 3.52; 95% CI, 1.99-6.20; P < .001) and reinfection or death (HR, 3.71; 95% CI, 1.24-11.09; P < .001). Need for flap coverage had an increased hazard of reoperation or death (HR, 3.24; 95% CI, 1.61-6.54; P = .001). Conclusions: The ideal duration of antibiotics to treat FRI is unclear. In this multicenter study, there was no association between antibiotic treatment duration and surgery- or infection-free survival.

3DFRINet: A Framework for the Detection and Diagnosis of Fracture Related Infection in Low Extremities Based on 18F-FDG PET/CT 3D Images.

Fracture related infection (FRI) is one of the most devastating complications after fracture surgery in the lower extremities, which can lead to extremely high morbidity and medical costs. Therefore, early comprehensive evaluation and accurate diagnosis of patients are critical for appropriate treatment, prevention of complications, and good prognosis. 18Fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) is one of the most commonly used medical imaging modalities for diagnosing FRI. With the development of deep learning, more neural networks have been proposed and become powerful computer-aided diagnosis tools in medical imaging. Therefore, a fully automated two-stage framework for FRI detection and diagnosis, 3DFRINet (Three Dimension FRI Network), is proposed for 18F-FDG PET/CT 3D imaging. The first stage can effectively extract and fuse the features of both modalities to accurately locate the lesion by the dual-branch design and attention module. The second stage reduces the dimensionality of the image by using the maximum intensity projection, which retains the effective features while reducing the computational effort and achieving excellent diagnostic performance. The diagnostic performance of lesions reached 91.55% accuracy, 0.9331 AUC, and 0.9250 F1 score. 3DFRINet has an advantage over six nuclear medicine experts in each classification metric. The statistical analysis shows that 3DFRINet is equivalent or superior to the primary nuclear medicine physicians and comparable to the senior nuclear medicine physicians. In conclusion, this study first proposed a method based on 18F-FDG PET/CT three-dimensional imaging for FRI location and diagnosis. This method shows superior lesion detection rate and diagnostic efficiency and therefore has good prospects for clinical application.

Is there a role for suppression of infection in managing fracture-related infection following intra-medullary nailing?

BACKGROUND: The management of fracture-related infection has undergone radical progress following the development of international guidelines. However, there is limited consideration to the realities of healthcare in low-resource environments due to a lack of available evidence in the literature from these settings. Initial antimicrobial suppression to support fracture union is frequently used in low- and middle-income countries despite the lack of published clinical evidence to support its practice. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes following initial antimicrobial suppression to support fracture union in the management of fracture-related infection. METHODS: A retrospective review of consecutive patients treated with initial antimicrobial suppression to support fracture healing followed by definitive eradication surgery to manage fracture-related infections following intramedullary fixation was performed. Indications for this approach were; a soft tissue envelope not requiring reconstructive surgery, radiographic evidence of stable fixation with adequate alignment, and progression towards fracture union. RESULTS: This approach was associated with successful treatment in 51/55 (93 %) patients. Fracture union was achieved in 52/55 (95 %) patients with antimicrobial suppression alone. Remission of infection was achieved in 54/55 (98 %) patients following definitive infection eradication surgery. Following antibiotic suppression, 6/46 (13 %) pathogens isolated from intra-operative samples demonstrated multi-drug resistance. CONCLUSION: Initial antimicrobial suppression to support fracture healing followed by definitive infection eradication surgery was associated with successful treatment in 93 % of patients. The likelihood of remission of infection increases when eradication surgery is performed in a healed bone. This approach was not associated with an increased risk of developing multi-drug-resistant infections compared to contemporary bone infection cohorts in the published literature. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Compassionate use of cefiderocol in a complex case of extensively drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii fracture-related infection: a comprehensive approach and multidisciplinary management.

PURPOSE: Fracture-related infections (FRI) pose a difficult management problem, as they require numerous surgical interventions and extended antibiotic treatments, especially when a multidrug-resistant organism is involved, with a paucity of available literature that provides guidance. RESULTS: A 42 year-old male presents an open diaphyseal tibia and fibula fracture, complicated by soft tissue necrosis and infections caused by extensively drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (XDR-Ab). Initially treated with a damage control external fixator, the patient underwent multiple surgical procedures, including radical debridement, negative pressure wound therapy, external fixator revisions and reconstructive surgery using a latissimus dorsi free flap. The emergence of colistin resistance in the Acinetobacter baumannii strain led to the compassionate use of cefiderocol, finally achieving clinical cure. CONCLUSIONS: This case report is one of the firsts that highlights the potential efficacy of cefiderocol in treating challenging bone and joint infections sustained by XDR-Ab. The successful outcome also emphasizes the importance of a comprehensive, multidisciplinary approach in achieving favorable results in complex FRI.

Costs of fracture-related infection: the impact on direct hospital costs and healthcare utilisation.

PURPOSE: Fracture-Related Infection (FRI) is associated with high medical costs and prolonged healthcare utilization. However, limited data is available on the financial impact. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of FRI on direct hospital costs and healthcare utilization. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study in a level-1 trauma centre in the Netherlands. Patients ≥ 18 years, after open reduction and internal fixation of a long bone fracture between January 1st 2016 and November 1st 2021, were included. Exclusion criteria were Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥ 16, indefinable data on costs or incomplete follow-up. Hospital costs related to fracture treatment were individually calculated based on procedure codes raised with a fixed percentage of overhead expenses, in line with hospital billing policies. RESULTS: In total, 246 patients were included with a median follow-up of 1 year (IQR 0.6-1.8). A total of 45 patients developed FRI, of whom 15 patients had an FRI recurrence. Compared to non-FRI patients, median hospital costs from an FRI patient without and with recurrence, were respectively three (3.1) and seven (7.6) times higher. Compared to non-FRI patients, increased costs in patients with FRI or recurrent FRI are due to respectively a fivefold or even tenfold prolonged length-of-stay, two or seven additional infection-related surgeries, and 21 or 55 days of intravenous antibiotic treatment. CONCLUSION: Direct healthcare costs of patients with single occurrence of FRI after long bone fracture treatment are three times higher compared to non-FRI patients. In case of FRI-recurrence, the differences in costs might even increase to sevenfold. To put this in perspective, cost of severely injured trauma patients were recently established at approximately 25.000 euros. Compared to non-FRI patients, increased costs in patients with FRI or recurrent FRI are due to respectively a fivefold or even tenfold prolonged length-of-stay, two or seven additional infection-related surgeries and 21 or 55 days of intravenous antibiotic treatment. Not only from patient perspective but also from a financial aspect, it is important to focus on prevention of (recurrent) FRI.

Case Report: Hip arthroplasty after fracture-related joint infection caused by extensively drug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae.

This case-report focuses on a 23-year-old soldier suffering from a fracture-related hip joint infection (FRI) due to extensively drug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae and S. epidermidis. The patient underwent multiple septic revision surgeries including the removal of remaining shrapnel accompanied by last-resort antimicrobial therapy with cefiderocol and colistin. Additionally, the surgeries included repeated tissue sampling for microbiological and histopathological analysis. An antibiotic-loaded cemented filler containing cefiderocol was used to improve local antimicrobial therapy. The biopsies prior to and during hip replacement surgery confirmed successful microbe eradication. Hip arthroplasty restored hip joint function and significantly improved patient's quality of life. The utilization of a trabecular metal shell and a meta-diaphyseally anchored cementless hip stem ensured secure implant fixation and early patient mobilisation. An adjusted biofilm active oral antimicrobial therapy after arthroplasty intervention was continued to prevent early periprosthetic joint infection. This case emphasizes the difficulties of managing FRI and multidrug-resistant pathogens. It contributes valuable insight into navigating complex orthopedic cases while ensuring successful hip arthroplasty outcomes. In conclusion, early interdisciplinary collaboration, appropriate antimicrobial therapy along with tailored surgical interventions are crucial for managing such complex cases successfully.

What can they expect? Decreased quality of life and increased postoperative complication rate in patients with a fracture-related infection.

BACKGROUND: By gaining insight into the Quality of Life (QoL) status and occurrence of complications, critical facets in the care for patients with Fracture-Related Infection (FRI) can be mitigated and measures can be taken to improve their outcome. Therefore, the aims of this study were to 1) determine the QoL in FRI patients in comparison to non-FRI patients and 2) describe the occurrence of other complications in both FRI and non-FRI patients. METHODS: An ambidirectional cohort study was conducted in a level 1 trauma centre between January 1st 2016 and November 1st 2021. All patients who underwent surgical stabilisation of an isolated long bone fracture were eligible for inclusion. To avoid confounding, only patients with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) <16 were included. Data regarding patient demographics, fracture characteristics, treatment, follow-up and complications were collected of both non-FRI and FRI patients. QoL was assessed through the use of five-level EuroQol five-dimension (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaires twelve months post-injury. RESULTS: A total of 134 patients were included in this study, of whom 38 (28%) FRI patients and 96 (72%) non-FRI patients. In comparison to non-FRI patients, FRI patients scored significantly worse on the QoL assessment regarding the index value (p = 0.012) and the domains mobility (p<0.001), usual activities (p = 0.010) and pain/discomfort (p = 0.009). Other postoperative complications were more often reported (p<0.001) in FRI patients (66%, n = 25/38) compared to non-FRI patients (27%, n = 26/96). During the median follow-up of 14.5 months (interquartile range (IQR) 9.5-26.5), 25 FRI patients developed a total of 49 distinctive complications besides FRI. The complications nonunion (18%, n = 9/49), infection other than FRI (e.g. line infection, urinary tract infection, pneumonia) (18%, n = 9/49) and implant failure (14%, n = 7/49) were the most frequently described in the FRI group. CONCLUSION: Patients who suffered from an FRI have a decreased QoL in comparison to those without an FRI. Moreover, patients with an FRI have a higher rate of additional complications. These findings can help in patient counselling regarding the potential physical and mental consequences of having a complicated course of recovery due to an infection.

The surgical management of fracture-related infection. Surgical strategy selection and the need for early surgical intervention.

The aim of this narrative review is to describe the various surgical management strategies employed in fracture-related infection (FRI), to explore how they are selected and discuss the rationale for early surgical intervention. Surgical treatment options in patients with FRI include debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR), revision (exchange) or removal. In selecting a treatment strategy, a variety of factors need to be considered, including the condition of the bone, soft tissues, host and causative microorganism. Irrespective of the selected treatment strategy, prompt surgical intervention should be considered in order to confirm the diagnosis of an FRI, to identify the causative organism, remove necrotic or non-viable tissue that can serve as a nidus for ongoing infection, ensure a healthy soft tissue envelope and to prevent the vicious cycle of infection associated with skeletal and/or implant instability. Ultimately, the objective is to prevent the establishment of a persistent infection. Urgent surgery may be indicated in case of active, progressive disease with systemic deterioration, local progression of infection, deterioration of soft tissues, or progressive fracture instability. In case of static disease, the patient should be monitored closely and surgery can be performed on an elective basis, allowing adequate time for optimisation of the host through risk factor modification, optimisation of the soft tissues and careful planning of the surgery.

[Treatment strategies for fracture-related infections with concurrent soft tissue damage]. / Therapiestrategien bei frakturassoziierten Infektionen mit begleitendem Weichteilschaden.

Fracture-related infections are the predominant complication following surgical fracture treatment. The distal lower leg, e.g., in pilon tibial fractures, is at a high risk of infection due to poor soft tissue coverage, particularly in cases of open fractures in this area. Fracture-related infections with significant soft tissue damage require special attention alongside treatment of the infection itself. In general, the principle is that healing of fracture-related infection is not possible without sufficient soft tissue coverage. Therefore, it is crucial to integrate both soft tissue damage and fracture-related infection into a comprehensive treatment plan from the beginning. An interdiscpilinary treatment approach between trauma and plastic surgery is often necessary and beneficial. In cases, where fracture fixation devices or bone is exposed, mid- or long-term use of vacuum-assisted wound therapy is not advisable due to a higher risk of reinfection. Hence, an interdisciplinary treatment strategy involving trauma and plastic surgery should prioritize early soft tissue closure, referred to as the "orthoplastic approach". If this cannot be done in the own hospital, early patient transfer is indicated to ensure optimal interdisciplinary therapy with early soft tissue closure and simultaneous trauma surgical treatment to control the infection and enable bone healing. Free fasciocutaneous or muscle flap techniques in combination with adequate trauma surgical and antibiotic therapy lead to good reliable results in these situations.

Fracture related infection (FRI) of the upper extremity correlates with poor bone and soft tissue healing.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the specific course and complication profile following the development of FRI in the upper extremity. METHODS: An IRB-approved retrospective review was conducted on a consecutive series of operatively managed patients within an academic medical center between 1/2010 and 6/2022. Included patients met the following criteria: (1) upper extremity fracture definitively treated with internal fixation (2) development of criteria for suggestive or confirmatory FRI (as per the FRI Consensus Group) and (3) age ≥ 18 years. Baseline demographics, medical history, injury information, infection characteristics, hospital quality measures, and outcomes were recorded. A 3:1 propensity-matched control cohort of patients without FRI was obtained using the same dataset. Univariable analysis was performed to compare the outcomes (rate of nonunion, time to bone healing, need for soft tissue coverage, patient reported joint stiffness at final follow-up) of the FRI vs Non-FRI cohorts. RESULTS: Of 2827 patients treated operatively for an upper extremity fracture, 43 (1.53%) met criteria for suggestive of confirmatory FRI. The successful propensity match (43 FRI, 129 Non-FRI) revealed no differences in demographics, baseline health status, or fracture location. FRI patients underwent more reoperations (p < 0.001), experienced an increased rate of removal of hardware (p < 0.001), and were admitted more frequently following index operation (p < 0.001). The FRI cohort had higher rates of fracture nonunion (p = 0.003), and a prolonged mean time to bone healing in months (8.37 ± 7.29 FRI vs. 4.14 ± 5.75 Non-FRI, p < 0.001). Additionally, the FRI cohort had a greater need for soft tissue coverage throughout their post-operative fracture treatment (p = 0.014). While there was no difference in eventual bone healing (p = 0.250), FRI patients experienced a higher incidence of affected joint stiffness at final follow-up (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients who develop an FRI of the upper extremity undergo more procedures and experience increased complications throughout their treatment, specifically increased joint stiffness. Despite this, ultimate outcome profiles are similar between patients who experience FRI and those who do not following operative repair of an upper extremity fracture. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Key aspects of soft tissue management in fracture-related infection: recommendations from an international expert group.

A judicious, well-planned bone and soft tissue debridement remains one of the cornerstones of state-of-the-art treatment of fracture-related infection (FRI). Meticulous surgical excision of all non-viable tissue can, however, lead to the creation of large soft tissue defects. The management of these defects is complex and numerous factors need to be considered when selecting the most appropriate approach. This narrative review summarizes the current evidence with respect to soft tissue management in patients diagnosed with FRI. Specifically we discuss the optimal timing for tissue closure following debridement in cases of FRI, the need for negative microbiological culture results from the surgical site as a prerequisite for definitive wound closure, the optimal type of flap in case of large soft tissue defects caused by FRI and the role of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in FRI. Finally, recommendations are made with regard to soft tissue management in FRI that should be useful for clinicians in daily clinical practice.Level of evidence Level V.

[Diagnostic and therapeutic work-up of infected tibial nonunion]. / Diagnostik und Therapie der infizierten Tibia-Pseudarthrose.

BACKGROUND: The failure of bone fracture healing is one of the major complications of fracture treatment, especially of the tibia due to its limited soft tissue coverage and high rate of open injuries. Although implant development is constantly progressing and modern surgical techniques are continuously improving, infected tibial nonunion plays a decisive role in terms of its variable clinical presentation. OBJECTIVE: This article provides guidelines for the successful surgical treatment of infected tibial nonunion. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Strategies are presented to identify infection as a cause of failure of fracture healing and to achieve infection and bone healing. RESULTS: A significant amount of tibial nonunions primarily thought to be aseptic ultimately turn out to be infected nonunions. CONCLUSION: The treatment of infected tibial nonunion requires extensive clinical, radiological and laboratory diagnostics as well as a profound biomechanical and biological understanding of the bone situation. This is the only way to achieve rapid osseous healing with as few revision interventions as possible.

Fracture-related infection: Analysis of healthcare utilisation and associated costs.

AIMS: A consensus definition of fracture related infection (FRI) has been created with the aim of standardising diagnosis and eliminating heterogeneity that prevents accurate comparison between existing studies. FRI remains one of the most challenging complications in musculoskeletal trauma surgery and carries with it a significant cost burden. A review of UK finances has not been completed utilising consensus diagnostic criteria. The goal of this study was to investigate the hospital-associated healthcare cost related to the treatment of FRI within an NHS major trauma centre. METHOD: Through retrospective case-control analysis, 1240 patients with close fractures were identified. Of those, 21 patients with FRI were compared to 63 uninfected patients. Patients were matched based on fracture location, type of procedure and proximity in age. The costs assessed included hospitalisation, imaging, outpatient consultation, pharmaceuticals and procedure charges. Cost data was retrieved from healthcare resource group (HRG) guidelines, NHS Business Service Authority's (NBSA) prescription rates and internal costing. RESULTS: The FRI group were found to incur a 2.51 increase in total medial healthcare cost compared to the control group (£22,058 vs £8798 [p < 0.001]), which was primarily due to increased procedural costs (£13,020 vs £6291 [p < 0.001]) and length of hospital stay (£7552 vs £2124 [p < 0.001]). CONCLUSION: Whilst diagnosis of FRI has a more rigorous definition following the new consensus, prevalence and cost outcomes are similar to previous studies. Given the deficiency in funding and ongoing challenges of resource allocation to the NHS, it is prudent to incorporate studies such as this into stratifying departmental budgets and quality improvement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.