Effect of Hepatic Impairment on Trilaciclib Pharmacokinetics.

Trilaciclib is a first-in-class, intravenous cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitor approved for reducing the incidence of chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression in adult patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer receiving a platinum/etoposide-containing or topotecan-containing regimen. No dose adjustment is recommended for participants with mild hepatic impairment (HI) based on previous population pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis. This open-label, parallel-group study examined the impact of moderate and severe HI on the PK of trilaciclib. The study employed a reduced study design. Participants with moderate (Child-Pugh B, n = 8) and severe (Child-Pugh C, n = 5) HI and matched healthy controls (n = 11) received a single intravenous dose of trilaciclib 100 mg/m2. The unbound fraction of trilaciclib was comparable between the HI groups and the matched healthy control group. The unbound trilaciclib extent of exposure (i.e., area under the concentration-time curve) in participants with moderate and severe HI was ∼40% and ∼60% higher, respectively, compared with healthy matched controls based on Child-Pugh classification. Ad hoc analysis using National Cancer Institute classification showed similar results. The US Food and Drug Administration-approved trilaciclib dose of 240 mg/m2 should be reduced by ∼30%, to 170 mg/m2, for patients with moderate or severe HI.

Exploring the Impact of Hepatic Impairment on Pralsetinib Pharmacokinetics.

Pralsetinib is a kinase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of metastatic rearranged during transfection (RET) fusion-positive non-small cell lung cancer. Pralsetinib is primarily eliminated by the liver and hence hepatic impairment (HI) is likely alter its pharmacokinetics (PK). Mild HI has been shown to have minimal impact on the PK of pralsetinib. This hepatic impairment study aimed to determine the pralsetinib PK, safety and tolerability in subjects with moderate and severe HI, as defined by the Child-Pugh and National Cancer Institute Organ Dysfunction Working Group (NCI-ODWG) classification systems, in comparison to subjects with normal hepatic function. Based on the Child-Pugh classification, subjects with moderate and severe HI had similar systemic exposure (area under the plasma concentration time curve from time 0 to infinity [AUC0-∞]) to pralsetinib, with AUC0-∞ geometric mean ratios (GMR) of 1.12 and 0.858, respectively, compared to subjects with normal hepatic function. Results based on the NCI-ODWG classification criteria were comparable; the AUC0-∞ GMR were 1.22 and 0.858, respectively, for subjects with moderate and severe HI per NCI-ODWG versus those with normal hepatic function. These results suggested that moderate and severe hepatic impairment did not have a meaningful impact on the exposure to pralsetinib, thus not warranting a dose adjustment in this population.

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Firsocostat, an Acetyl-Coenzyme A Carboxylase Inhibitor, in Participants with Mild, Moderate, and Severe Hepatic Impairment.

Firsocostat is an oral, liver-targeted inhibitor of acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase in development for the treatment of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis. Hepatic organic anion transporting polypeptides play a significant role in the disposition of firsocostat with minimal contributions from uridine diphospho-glucuronosyltransferase and cytochrome P450 3A enzymes. This phase 1 study evaluated the pharmacokinetics and safety of firsocostat in participants with mild, moderate, or severe hepatic impairment. Participants with stable mild, moderate, or severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh A, B, or C, respectively [n = 10 per cohort]) and healthy matched controls with normal hepatic function (n = 10 per cohort) received a single oral dose of firsocostat (20 mg for mild and moderate hepatic impairment; 5 mg for severe hepatic impairment) with intensive pharmacokinetic sampling over 96 h. Safety was monitored throughout the study. Firsocostat plasma exposure (AUCinf) was 83%, 8.7-fold, and 30-fold higher in participants with mild, moderate, and severe hepatic impairment, respectively, relative to matched controls. Firsocostat was generally well tolerated, and all reported adverse events were mild in nature. Dose adjustment is not necessary for the administration of firsocostat in patients with mild hepatic impairment. However, based on the observed increases in firsocostat exposure, dose adjustment should be considered for patients with moderate or severe hepatic impairment, and additional safety and efficacy data from future clinical trials will further inform dose adjustment.

Anticoagulation in venous thromboembolism for the general physician.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is frequently encountered across various specialties. The management of VTE has become more nuanced, requiring consideration of several factors when deciding on the choice and duration of anticoagulation. This evidence-based review article summarises the current practice and evidence behind anticoagulation in VTE, incorporating national and international guidelines. Factors influencing decision-making around the choice and duration of anticoagulation, along with special circumstances such as cancer and antiphospholipid syndrome, are discussed. The clinical utility of thrombophilia screening is also addressed.

Building a Predictive PBPK Model for Human OATP Substrates: a Strategic Framework for Early Evaluation of Clinical Pharmacokinetic Variations Using Pitavastatin as an Example.

To select a drug candidate for clinical development, accurately and promptly predicting human pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles, assessing drug-drug interactions (DDIs), and anticipating potential PK variations in disease populations are crucial steps in drug discovery. The complexity of predicting human PK significantly increases when hepatic transporters are involved in drug clearance (CL) and volume of distribution (Vss). A strategic framework is developed here, utilizing pitavastatin as an example. The framework includes the construction of a monkey physiologically-based PK (PBPK) model, model calibration to obtain scaling factors (SF) of in vitro-in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE) for various clearance parameters, human model development and validation, and assessment of DDIs and PK variations in disease populations. Through incorporating in vitro human parameters and calibrated SFs from the monkey model of 3.45, 0.14, and 1.17 for CLint,active, CLint,passive, and CLint,bile, respectively, and together with the relative fraction transported by individual transporters obtained from in vitro studies and the optimized Ki values for OATP inhibition, the model reasonably captured observed pitavastatin PK profiles, DDIs and PK variations in human subjects carrying genetic polymorphisms, i.e., AUC within 20%. Lastly, when applying the functional reduction based on measured OATP1B biomarkers, the model adequately predicted PK changes in the hepatic impairment population. The present study presents a strategic framework for early-stage drug development, enabling the prediction of PK profiles and assessment of PK variations in scenarios like DDIs, genetic polymorphism, and hepatic impairment-related disease states, specifically focusing on OATP substrates.

Stepwise Introduction of Elexacaftor-Tezacaftor-Ivacaftor in Patients With Cystic Fibrosis and Liver Cirrhosis Child-Pugh A or B Using Clinical and Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: A Case Series.

PURPOSE: Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a monogenetic disease caused by mutations in the gene encoding the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein and affecting multiple organs, including the lungs and liver. Almost 90% of people affected carry at least 1 Phe508del CFTR mutation. Medical treatment with the CFTR-modulating drug elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor (ETI) has been proven to be efficacious in carriers of at least 1 Phe508del CFTR mutation. Use of ETI in patients with CF (pwCF) and liver cirrhosis is still controversial. Therefore, stepwise introduction of ETI in pwCF and liver cirrhosis Child-Pugh A or B was evaluated using clinical and therapeutic drug monitoring. METHODS: Seven consecutive pwCF received ETI. Four dosing steps were defined, at each of which the patients underwent clinical examination, routine blood tests, and therapeutic drug monitoring. Exposure of elexacaftor, tezacaftor, and ivacaftor was assessed by means of determination of AUC. FINDINGS: ETI was successfully introduced and maintained in all pwCF. In those with Child-Pugh B cirrhosis (n = 2), diminishment of the dose as recommended by the label resulted in AUC values that were lower than the mean AUC values in pwCF without hepatic impairment, as reported previously. IMPLICATIONS: Despite the limitations of this small case series, stepwise elevation of ETI dose did not induce clinical adverse effects or increases in serum liver test results under strict clinical follow-up and therapeutic drug monitoring, and may allow tolerable introduction of this therapy in pwCF and cirrhosis Child-Pugh A and possibly B.

Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling for Prediction of 5-FU Pharmacokinetics in Cancer Patients with Hepatic Impairment After 5-FU and Capecitabine Administration.

PURPOSE: 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and its prodrug capecitabine are commonly prescribed anti-tumor medications. We aimed to establish physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models of capecitabine-metabolites and 5-FU-metabolites to describe their pharmacokinetics in tumor and plasma of cancer patients with liver impairment. METHODS: Models including the cancer compartment were developed in PK-Sim® and MoBi® and evaluated by R programming language with 25 oral capecitabine and 18 intravenous 5-FU studies for cancer patients with and without liver impairment. RESULTS: The PBPK models were constructed successfully as most simulated Cmax and AUClast were within two-fold error of observed values. The simulated alterations of tumor 5-FU Cmax and AUClast in cancer patients with severe liver injury compared with normal liver function were 1.956 and 3.676 after oral administration of capecitabine, but no significant alteration was observed after intravenous injection of 5-FU. Besides, 5-FU concentration in tumor tissue increases with higher tumor blood flow but not tumor size. Sensitivity analysis revealed that dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) and other metabolic enzymes' activity, capecitabine intestinal permeability and plasma protein scale factor played a vital role in tumor and plasma 5-FU pharmacokinetics. CONCLUSIONS: PBPK model prediction suggests no dosage adaption of capecitabine or 5-FU is required for cancer patients with hepatic impairment but it would be reduced when the toxic reaction is observed. Furthermore, tumor blood flow rate rather than tumor size is critical for 5-FU concentration in tumor. In summary, these models could predict pharmacokinetics of 5-FU in tumor in cancer patients with varying characteristics in different scenarios.

Impact of renal and hepatic function on first opioid prescriptions in cancer patients: an acute care hospital database study linked to medical claims data and laboratory data.

BACKGROUND: Cancer patients often have impaired renal and hepatic function. Opioids are essential to relieve painful symptoms in cancer patients. However, it is unknown which opioids are first prescribed for cancer patients with renal and hepatic impairment. The objective is to investigate the association between the type of first prescribed opioids and the renal/hepatic function of cancer patients. METHODS: We used a multicenter database from 2010 to 2019. The number of days from the first opioid prescription to the death was defined as the prognostic period. This period was divided into six categories. The prevalence of opioid prescriptions was calculated for each assessment of renal and hepatic function, divided into prognostic periods. Multinomial logistic regression analysis was used to explore the influence of renal and hepatic function on the first opioid choice. RESULTS: The study included 11 945 patients who died of cancer. In all prognostic period categories, the patients with worse renal function received fewer morphine prescriptions. No trend was observed in hepatic function. The odds ratio of oxycodone to morphine with reference to estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥90 was 1.707 (95% confidence interval: 1.433-2.034) for estimated glomerular filtration rate <30. The odds ratio of fentanyl to morphine with reference to estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥90 was 1.785 (95% confidence interval: 1.492-2.134) for estimated glomerular filtration rate <30. No association was identified between hepatic function and the choice of prescribed opioids. CONCLUSION: Cancer patients with renal impairment tended to avoid morphine prescriptions, and no specific trend was observed in cancer patients with hepatic impairment.

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Multiple-Dose Alpelisib in Participants with Moderate or Severe Hepatic Impairment: A Phase 1, Open-Label, Parallel Group Study.

The pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of single-dose alpelisib (300 mg) were assessed in participants with moderate to severe hepatic impairment (n = 6 each) compared with their matching healthy controls (n = 11). Blood samples were collected upto 144 hours post-dose and evaluated by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) assay. The primary PK parameters (maximum plasma concentration [Cmax], area under the curve [AUC]inf and AUClast) and secondary PK parameters (AUC0-t, apparent total body clearance [CL/F], apparent volume of distribution [Vz/F], time of maximum observed concentration [Tmax], and half-life [T1/2]) of oral alpelisib 300 mg were determined from individual plasma concentration-time profiles using non­compartmental analysis. Cmax of alpelisib decreased by approximately 17% in the moderate hepatic impairment group vs. the healthy control group (geometric mean ratio; GMR [90% confidence interval; CI], 0.833 [0.530, 1.31]). Cmax in the severe hepatic impairment group was comparable to that of the healthy control group (GMR [90% CI], 1.00 [0.636, 1.58]). AUClast for alpelisib decreased by approximately 27% in the moderate hepatic impairment group vs. the healthy control group (GMR [90% CI], 0.726 [0.487, 1.08]). AUClast was 26% higher in the severe hepatic impairment group compared with the healthy control group (GMR [90% CI], 1.26 [0.845, 1.87]). Overall, 3 participants (13.0%) experienced at least 1 adverse event which were either grade 1 or 2. Adverse events did not lead to study drug discontinuation. No grade 3 or 4 adverse events, serious adverse events or deaths were reported. The results indicate that a single dose of alpelisib was well tolerated in this study population. There was no significant impact of moderate or severe hepatic impairment on the exposure of alpelisib.

Impact of Organ Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics of Therapeutic Peptides and Proteins.

The kidneys and liver are major organs involved in eliminating small-molecule drugs from the body. Characterization of the effects of renal impairment (RI) and hepatic impairment (HI) on pharmacokinetics (PK) have informed dosing in patients with these organ impairments. However, the knowledge about the impact of organ impairment on therapeutic peptides and proteins is still evolving. In this study, we reviewed how often therapeutic peptides and proteins were assessed for the effect of RI and HI on PK, the findings, and the resulting labeling recommendations. RI effects were reported in labeling for 30 (57%) peptides and 98 (39%) proteins and HI effects for 20 (38%) peptides and 55 (22%) proteins. Dose adjustments were recommended for RI in 11 of the 30 (37%) peptides and 10 of the 98 (10%) proteins and for HI in 7 of the 20 (35%) peptides and 3 of the 55 (5%) proteins. Additional actionable labeling includes risk mitigation strategies; for example, some product labels have recommended avoid use or monitor toxicities in patients with HI. Over time, there is an increasing structural diversity of therapeutic peptides and proteins, including the use of non-natural amino acids and conjugation technologies, which suggests a potential need for reassessing the need to evaluate the effect of RI and HI. Herein, we discuss scientific considerations for weighing the risk of PK alteration due to RI or HI for peptide and protein products. We briefly discuss other organs that may affect the PK of peptides and proteins administered via other delivery routes.

Brigatinib pharmacokinetics in patients with chronic hepatic impairment.

Brigatinib is an anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor approved for the treatment of ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer. This open-label, parallel-group study investigated the effect of chronic hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of brigatinib to inform dosing recommendations for these patients. Participants with hepatic impairment classified according to Child-Pugh categories of mild (A), moderate (B), or severe (C) and matched-healthy participants with normal hepatic function received a single oral dose of 90-mg brigatinib. Plasma samples were collected for the determination of brigatinib plasma protein binding and estimation of plasma PK parameters. Twenty-seven participants were enrolled (Child-Pugh A-C, n = 6 each; matched-healthy participants, n = 9). The mean fraction of free plasma brigatinib was comparable for the Child-Pugh A (11.1%), Child-Pugh B (10.8%), and healthy participant groups (8.5%); free brigatinib was higher in the Child-Pugh C group (23.1%). There were no clinically meaningful effects of mild or moderate hepatic impairment on unbound systemic exposures (area under the plasma concentration-time curve [AUC]) of brigatinib (geometric least-squares mean ratios [90% CI] of 89.32% [69.79%-114.31%] and 99.55% [77.78%-127.41%], respectively). In the severe hepatic impairment group, brigatinib unbound AUC was approximately 37% higher (geometric least-squares mean ratio [90% CI] of 137.41% [107.37%-175.86%]) compared with healthy participants with normal hepatic function. Brigatinib was well tolerated in healthy participants and in participants with hepatic impairment. No dose adjustment is required for patients with mild or moderate hepatic impairment. The brigatinib dose should be reduced by approximately 40% for patients with severe hepatic impairment.

A retrospective evaluation of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) management strategies in patients with cancer on active chemotherapy.

Use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with cancer on active chemotherapy is challenging due to changes in renal or hepatic function, thrombocytopenia, chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), and drug-drug interactions (DDIs) attributed to disease or treatment. The purpose of this retrospective cohort analysis was to characterize DOAC management through various interventions and evaluate the efficacy and safety of DOAC use in this patient population. A total of 58 patients with 97 unique index periods in which a patient was concomitantly on a DOAC and chemotherapy were identified. Several instances were observed in which an intervention should be made based on manufacturer guidance or clinical judgment. Of 37 instances attributed to changes in renal function, the following interventions were employed: dose adjustments (10/37), holding DOAC therapy until renal function improved (held 3/37, restarted 4/37), changing to an alternative anticoagulant (5/37), DOAC discontinuation (2/37), or no change (13/37). One change was made in response to decreased hepatic function (1/15). DOACs were held in the setting of platelet counts below 50 K/mm3 (8/20) and restarted when platelets improved above this threshold (5/20). In patients with CINV, DOAC therapy was continued (26/32) with few changes made. To manage DOAC-chemotherapy DDIs, changes in DOAC agents (4/6) and dose reductions in chemotherapy agents (2/6) were made. Thrombotic and bleeding events did not strongly correlate with renal or hepatic impairment, thrombocytopenia, CINV, or DDIs. Further guidance regarding the use of these agents in this patient population is warranted to address management strategies, efficacy, and safety. Use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with cancer on active chemotherapy is challenging due to changes in renal or hepatic function, thrombocytopenia, chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), and drug-drug interactions (DDIs) attributed to disease or treatment. The purpose of this retrospective cohort analysis was to characterize DOAC management and evaluate the efficacy and safety of DOAC use in this patient population. A total of 58 patients with 97 unique index periods in which a patient was concomitantly on a DOAC and chemotherapy were identified. Several instances were observed in which an intervention should be made based on manufacturer guidance or clinical judgment. Interventions employed are summarized graphically. Thrombotic and bleeding events did not strongly correlate with renal or hepatic impairment, thrombocytopenia, CINV, or DDIs. CINV chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, DDIs drug-drug interactions, DOAC direct oral anticoagulant, OAC oral anticoagulant.

Maribavir Pharmacokinetics and Safety in Participants With Moderate Hepatic Impairment: A Phase 1, Open-Label, Single-Dose, Parallel Group Study.

Maribavir, an orally bioavailable antiviral, has shown superior activity against posttransplant cytomegalovirus infection compared with conventional antivirals. It is primarily metabolized in the liver. This open-label, single-center study evaluated the effect of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of maribavir in nontransplant participants. A single 200-mg dose of maribavir was administered orally under fasting conditions to participants with moderate hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh class B) (n = 10) and healthy controls (n = 10) matched for age, weight, sex, and smoking status. Compared with participants with normal hepatic function, maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to infinity values for maribavir in participants with moderate hepatic impairment were 1.346-fold (90%CI of geometric mean ratio, 1.091-1.660) and 1.261-fold (0.889-1.787) higher, respectively. However, Cmax and AUC values for unbound maribavir were comparable. For VP 44469, the main metabolite of maribavir, the Cmax and AUC from time 0 to infinity values were 1.190-fold (0.836-1.693) and 1.309-fold (1.007-1.702) higher, respectively, in participants with moderate hepatic impairment. In total, 7 mild treatment-emergent adverse events were reported, all in the moderate hepatic impairment group. Dysgeusia was the most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse event, at a frequency of 50%. These results indicated that total maribavir concentrations were mildly increased in participants with moderate hepatic impairment, while unbound concentrations were unaffected. Similar maribavir pharmacokinetics in participants with moderate hepatic impairment and normal hepatic function suggest that dose adjustment may not be required for patients with moderate hepatic impairment.

Changes in Disposition of Ezetimibe and Its Active Metabolites Induced by Impaired Hepatic Function: The Influence of Enzyme and Transporter Activities.

Ezetimibe (EZE) is a selective cholesterol absorption inhibitor. Hepatic impairment significantly increases the systemic exposure of EZE and its main active phenolic glucuronide, EZE-Ph. Although changes in efflux transporter activity partly explain the changes in EZE-Ph pharmacokinetics, the causes of the changes to EZE and the effects of the administration route on EZE-Ph remain unclear. A carbon tetrachloride (CCl4)-induced hepatic failure rat model was combined with in vitro experiments to explore altered EZE and EZE-Ph disposition caused by hepatic impairment. The plasma exposure of EZE and EZE-Ph increased by 11.1- and 4.4-fold in CCl4-induced rats following an oral administration of 10 mg/kg EZE, and by 2.1- and 16.4-fold after an intravenous injection. The conversion of EZE to EZE-Ph decreased concentration-dependently in CCl4-induced rat liver S9 fractions, but no change was observed in the intestinal metabolism. EZE-Ph was a substrate for multiple efflux and uptake transporters, unlike EZE. In contrast to efflux transporters, no difference was seen in the hepatic uptake of EZE-Ph between control and CCl4-induced rats. However, bile acids that accumulated due to liver injury inhibited the uptake of EZE-Ph by organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs) (glycochenodeoxycholic acid and taurochenodeoxycholic acid had IC50 values of 15.1 and 7.94 µM in OATP1B3-overexpressed cells). In conclusion, the increased plasma exposure of the parent drug EZE during hepatic dysfunction was attributed to decreased hepatic glucuronide conjugation, whereas the increased exposure of the metabolite EZE-Ph was mainly related to transporter activity, particularly the inhibitory effects of bile acids on OATPs after oral administration.

Effects of hepatic or renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become the cornerstone in treating many solid and hematological cancers. The ICIs, including anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4), anti-programed cell death 1 (PD-1), and anti-programed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) monoclonal antibodies, have significantly improved the prognosis of cancer patients. Meanwhile, the incidence of hepatic or renal impairment in cancer patients is increasing. However, data about the efficacy and safety of ICIs in patients with hepatic or renal impairment are limited. In this review, we characterize and summarize the pharmacokinetics (PK) of ICIs as well as the effects of hepatic or renal function on the PK of ICIs, and provide specific recommendations for clinicians when prescribing ICIs in patients with hepatic or renal impairment.

Dose Adjustment of Poly (ADP­Ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors in Patients with Hepatic or Renal Impairment.

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are small-molecule inhibitors of PARP enzymes (including PARP1, PARP2, and PARP3) that exhibit activity against tumor cells with defects in DNA repair. In recent years, five PARP inhibitors, olaparib, niraparib, rucaparib, talazoparib and veliparib, have been developed for the treatment of solid tumors, particularly in patients with breast-related cancer antigen (BRCA) 1/2 mutations, or those without a functional homologous recombination repair pathway. These novel treatments exhibit improved efficacy and toxicity when compared to conventional chemotherapy agents. The five PARP inhibitors are eliminated primarily via the liver and kidneys, hepatic or renal impairment may significantly affect their pharmacokinetics (PK). Therefore, it is important to know the effects of hepatic or renal impairment on the PK and safety of PARP inhibitors. In this review, we characterize and summarize the effects of hepatic and renal function on the PK of PARP inhibitors and provide specific recommendations for clinicians when prescribing PARP inhibitors in patients with hepatic or renal impairment.

Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Lenvatinib in Chinese Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Real-World Data.

Lenvatinib is a novel oral angiogenesis inhibitor approved in China for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) without prior systemic treatment. We described the population pharmacokinetics of lenvatinib in Chinese patients with advanced HCC and explore the potential patient characteristics associated with lenvatinib pharmacokinetics using real-world data. A total of 266 samples, provided by 127 Chinese patients with advanced HCC, were analyzed by nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. Monte Carlo simulation was conducted to assess impact of covariates on the exposure to lenvatinib. The clearance of lenvatinib in Chinese patients with advanced HCC was 5.3 L/h, and alkaline phosphatase, total bilirubin, and sex were identified as important covariates associated with it. The clearance of Child-Pugh class B patients (4.82L/h) was significantly lower than that of Child-Pugh class A patients (5.53 L/h), and the systemic exposure increased with the increase of alkaline phosphatase and total bilirubin. There were sex differences in the pharmacokinetic characteristics of lenvatinib. The clearance of women was significantly lower than that of men (4.61 vs 5.6 L/h; P < .001), and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve of women was ≈20% higher than that of men. In this study, a population pharmacokinetic model of lenvatinib was established, which can be used to simulate clinical trials or various dosing scenarios. Our findings provide important new insights for optimizing the use of lenvatinib in patients with advanced HCC.

Effect of mild or moderate hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of risdiplam.

AIM: This phase I, multicentre, open-label, nonrandomised, parallel-group, two-part study aimed to evaluate the effect of mild to moderate hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety and tolerability of a single oral dose of risdiplam. METHODS: Adult subjects (aged 18-70 years) with mild (Child-Pugh Class A; Part 1) or moderate (Child-Pugh Class B; Part 2) hepatic impairment were matched with subjects with normal hepatic function on sex, age, body mass index and smoking status. Each subject received a single oral dose of 5 mg of risdiplam. Plasma concentrations of risdiplam and its metabolite M1 were measured and PK parameters were compared. Adverse events, laboratory abnormalities, vital signs and electrocardiogram measurements were assessed. RESULTS: After a single dose (5 mg) of risdiplam, the risdiplam PK parameters area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity and maximum observed plasma concentration were approximately 20% and 5% lower, respectively, in subjects with mild hepatic impairment and approximately 8% and 20% higher, respectively, in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment compared with subjects with normal hepatic function. These differences were not statistically significant; all 90% confidence intervals for geometric least squares-means ratios spanned unity. No new risdiplam-related safety findings were observed in subjects with mild or moderate hepatic impairment. CONCLUSION: Mild or moderate hepatic impairment did not have a clinically relevant impact on the PK of risdiplam. Therefore, no dose adjustment is required in patients with mild or moderate hepatic impairment when receiving risdiplam.

Evaluation of pharmacokinetics and safety of talazoparib in patients with advanced cancer and varying degrees of hepatic impairment.

AIM: This phase I study investigated talazoparib pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety in patients with advanced solid tumours and varying degrees of hepatic function. METHODS: Patients with advanced solid tumours and normal hepatic function or varying degrees of hepatic impairment (mild, moderate or severe, based on National Cancer Institute Organ Dysfunction Working Group classification) received talazoparib 0.5 mg once daily for 22 calendar days. Plasma and urine samples after single and multiple doses were collected and analysed for talazoparib using validated assays. Plasma PK data from all patients were analysed using the population PK method. Plasma and urine PK parameters in PK-evaluable patients were calculated using noncompartmental analysis (NCA). Safety was monitored in all enrolled patients. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were enrolled; 37 had ≥1 PK concentration, among which 17 were evaluable for NCA. Population PK analysis (n = 37) indicated no significant impact of hepatic function on apparent clearance (CL/F) of talazoparib. Baseline creatinine clearance was the only significant covariate on CL/F (α = 0.05). NCA of data (n = 17) showed no clear trend for increase in exposure on day 22 with worsening hepatic function. Talazoparib protein binding was comparable in patients with varying hepatic function. Talazoparib was generally well tolerated, and the safety profile observed in this study was consistent with the known safety profile of the drug. CONCLUSIONS: Hepatic impairment (mild, moderate or severe) has no impact on the PK of talazoparib. No dose modification is recommended for patients with advanced solid tumours and various degrees of hepatic impairment, and this labelling language has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency.

Effect of Mild and Moderate Hepatic Impairment (Defined by Child-Pugh Classification and National Cancer Institute Organ Dysfunction Working Group Criteria) on Pexidartinib Pharmacokinetics.

Pexidartinib is a novel oral small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting the colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor. Pexidartinib undergoes extensive hepatic metabolism via multiple cytochrome P450 and uridine 5'-diphospho-glucuronosyl transferase enzymes, with ZAAD-1006a as the only major metabolite in human plasma. As pexidartinib is extensively metabolized, hepatic impairment (HI) could lead to increased exposure to pexidartinib. The objective of the two phase 1, open-label studies was to determine the pharmacokinetics of pexidartinib after a single 200-mg dose in subjects with mild and moderate HI, based on Child-Pugh classification (PL3397-A-U123: 8 mild HI and 8 moderate HI vs 16 matched healthy controls) and National Cancer Institute Organ Dysfunction Working Group (NCI-ODWG) criteria (PL3397-A-U129: 8 moderate HI versus 8 matched healthy controls [NCT04223635]). Based on Child-Pugh classification, exposure to pexidartinib (maximum observed concentration [Cmax ], area under the plasma concentration-time curve up to the last measurable concentration [AUClast ], and extrapolated to infinity [AUCinf ]) was similar in subjects with mild and moderate HI and in respective matched healthy controls, whereas ZAAD-1006a exposure (AUC) was approximately 27% to 28% and 41% to 48% higher in mild and moderate HI, respectively. According to NCI-ODWG criteria, total pexidartinib exposure was 42% to 46% higher in subjects with moderate HI, compared with healthy controls, and total ZAAD-1006a exposure was 70% to 79% higher for subjects with moderate HI, compared with matched healthy controls with normal hepatic function. These findings were used to develop appropriate dose recommendations in patients with hepatic impairment.