Nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer with untreated brain metastases: A multicenter single-arm phase 2 trial (NIke, LOGiK 2004).

BACKGROUND: The effect of dual immunotherapy combined with platinum-based chemotherapy on untreated brain metastases derived from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has remained unclear. METHODS: This multicenter single-arm phase 2 study enrolled patients with chemotherapy-naïve advanced NSCLC and at least one brain metastasis ≥ 5 mm in size that had not been previously treated. Patients received nivolumab plus ipilimumab combined with platinum-doublet chemotherapy (two cycles), followed by nivolumab-ipilimumab alone. The primary endpoint of the study was intracranial response rate as determined by modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) for brain metastases of ≥ 5 mm as target lesions. RESULTS: A total of 30 patients from 18 institutions was enrolled in this study. The median age was 66.5 years (range, 47-83 years), and 26 patients (87 %) had a non-squamous cell carcinoma histology. The median size of all target brain lesions was 8.4 mm, with a range of 5-39 mm. The intracranial response rate assessed by modified RECIST was 50.0 % (95 % CI, 33.2-66.8 %), with the rate of complete response being 20.0 %, and the study met its primary endpoint. The systemic response rate was 53.3 % (95 % CI, 36.1-69.8 %), and responses for intracranial and extracranial lesions were generally consistent. The median intracranial progression-free survival was 8.1 months, and both the median intracranial duration of response and time to brain radiotherapy were not reached. CONCLUSION: Nivolumab plus ipilimumab combined with platinum-based chemotherapy showed promising intracranial activity in NSCLC patients with untreated brain metastases. TRIAL REGISTRATION: jRCT071210019.

Phase I/II study of nivolumab plus lenvatinib for advanced biliary tract cancer (JCOG1808/NCCH1817, SNIPE).

BACKGROUND: Although cisplatin plus gemcitabine and other combinations have improved the survival of advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC), high unmet medical needs remain. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of nivolumab plus lenvatinib in the second-line treatment for advanced BTC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nivolumab (240 mg) was administered biweekly. Phase I determined the recommended phase II dose of lenvatinib (20 mg or 14 mg). In phase II, the primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints were disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. The planned sample size was 32 patients with a power of 80%, a one-sided alpha error of 5%, threshold ORR of 10%, and expected ORR of 30%. RESULTS: In phase I, the recommended dose of lenvatinib was determined to be 20 mg in six patients, with one dose-limiting toxicity (myocarditis). In phase II, we enrolled 26 patients. ORR, DCR, and median OS and PFS were 9.4% [90% confidence interval (CI) 2.6% to 22.5%], 53.1% (95% CI 34.7% to 70.9%), and 6.4 months (95% CI 4.9-9.7 months) and 2.5 months (95% CI 1.5-4.1 months), respectively. No response was observed in patients with the usage of antibiotics. The grade 3 or 4 adverse events were hypertension (59.4%) and biliary tract infection (37.5%). Rash (28.1%) and hypothyroidism (21.9%) were observed as immune-mediated adverse events of any grade. CONCLUSIONS: Nivolumab plus lenvatinib had a manageable safety in advanced BTC, but its efficacy in the second-line treatment was limited.

Long-Term Survival Outcomes With First-Line Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab-Based Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tumor PD-L1 <1%: a Pooled Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Nivolumab plus ipilimumab-based treatment regimens have shown long-term, durable efficacy benefit in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here we report clinical outcomes from a pooled analysis of patients with metastatic NSCLC and tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) <1% treated with first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab with or without two cycles of chemotherapy versus up to four cycles of chemotherapy in the randomized phase 3 CheckMate 227 and CheckMate 9LA studies. METHODS: Patients were aged ≥18 years and had stage IV/recurrent NSCLC with no sensitizing EGFR/ALK alterations. Assessments included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), and safety. RESULTS: In patients with tumor PD-L1 <1% in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab with or without chemotherapy (n = 322) versus chemotherapy (n = 315) arms, median OS was 17.4 versus 11.3 months, respectively, (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.54-0.76; 5-year OS rate, 20% versus 7%) at a median follow-up of 73.7 months. OS benefit was observed across key subgroups, including difficult-to-treat populations such as those with baseline brain metastases (HR = 0.44; 95% CI: 0.26-0.75) or squamous NSCLC (HR = 0.51; 95% CI: 0.36-0.72). In the overall pooled population, median PFS was 5.4 versus 4.9 months (HR = 0.72; 95% CI: 0.60-0.87; 5-year PFS rate, 9% versus 2%), ORR was 29% versus 22%, and median DOR was 18.0 versus 4.6 months. No new safety signals were observed. CONCLUSION: Nivolumab plus ipilimumab with or without chemotherapy provides a long-term, durable clinical benefit in patients with metastatic NSCLC and tumor PD-L1 <1%, supporting the use of this strategy as a first-line treatment option in this population with high unmet need.

Case report: Conjunctival melanoma treated with relatlimab and nivolumab showing remarkable response.

Conjunctival melanoma, an uncommon form of ocular melanoma, shares some molecular characteristics with cutaneous melanoma and some with mucosal melanoma. Treatment of cases where it becomes advanced or metastatic raises unique treatment challenges. Nivolumab/relatlimab (Opdualag) recently received FDA approval for metastatic melanoma based on the phase 2/3 RELATIVITY-047 trial, which showed better median progression-free survival (PFS) in the first-line setting without new safety signals. The efficacy of this drug in conjunctival melanoma has not been reported yet. Case presentation: An 87-year-old woman with a history of mild dementia was admitted to the oncology department with a large, exophytic tumor protruding from her left eye, diagnosed as conjunctival melanoma two years previously. This tumor was secreting a whitish fluid and obstructing her vision. Immunotherapy with Opdualag was started, with a near clinical complete response after the 1st cycle. The patient was treated with only four cycles due to worsening of her dementia. Conclusion: Nivolumab/relatlimab (Opdualag) is a promising treatment alternative in conjunctival melanoma when surgery is not viable.

A Case Report of Long-Term Survival Achieved by Nivolumab and Hyperthermia With Multiple Local Therapies for the Peritoneal Dissemination of Gastric Cancer.

A 60-year-old male with recurrent metastatic gastric cancer achieved long-term survival with nivolumab, hyperthermia, and local multisite therapy. The patient had a history of multiple relapses despite receiving standard treatment. After the failure of multiple lines of chemotherapy, nivolumab and hyperthermia were initiated. During this combination therapy, local treatments including surgery and radiation therapy were administered to treat the progressive disease. Remarkably, the patient achieved more than five years of overall survival time after starting nivolumab and external repeated hyperthermia with local therapies and has shown no measurable disease on imaging for the past 24 months. This case suggests that a combination of nivolumab, hyperthermia, and local therapies may offer a potential therapeutic strategy for patients with advanced gastric cancer.

A case of gastritis caused by immune checkpoint inhibitor treated with infliximab.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in various organs. Herein, we present a rare case involving a patient with immunotherapy-related gastritis who developed refractory vomiting and anorexia after treatment with nivolumab for cutaneous malignant melanoma. The patient was treated with oral corticosteroids, but the efficacy was limited. The symptoms improved markedly after treatment with infliximab. With the increasing use of ICIs, the number of reports of gastritis due to irAEs has also increased. Health care providers treating malignancies should be aware of this side effect and know how to diagnose and treat it.

Impact of immune-related adverse events on survival among patients with head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Aim: Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized treatment of metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs). Our goal was to assess for an association between immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and clinical outcomes for patients on ICIs.Methods: We analyzed a cohort of 110 HNSCC patients who received ICI therapy at the University of Virginia.Results: On review, 48% of our patients experienced an irAE with the most common events being hypothyroidism (30%), dermatitis (14%) and hepatitis (11%). Women were more likely to experience irAEs. Treatment interruption/discontinuation occurred in 43% patients with irAEs. Development of irAEs was associated with superior objective response rate (68 vs. 39%, p = 0.009), with a greater rate of CR (17 vs. 5%) and PR (32 vs. 16%). Twelve patients underwent ICI re-treatment following irAE, with 17% attaining a complete disease response, 25% attaining a partial response, 33% achieving stable disease and 25% experiencing disease progression with ICI resumption.Conclusion: Development of irAE was associated with superior objective response rate, with a greater rate of CR and PR. ICI re-treatment following irAE was feasible in a significant proportion of patients and can be attempted in carefully selected patients, given the dearth of second-line therapies for these patients.

While outcomes for patients who receive immunotherapy for advanced head and neck cancer are greatly improved compared with traditional chemotherapy, a feared complication of this treatment is immune-related side effects. The exact incidence of these side effects is not known in head and neck cancer but are well described in other cancers. In this study, about half of head and neck cancer patients who received immunotherapy developed side effects due to immune over-activation. Women and patients who did not receive radiation were more likely to develop these side effects. Patient who developed immune side effects were more likely to see shrinkage in their tumors, and may have a higher likelihood of longer survival, although the findings were not statistically significant.

Addition of nivolumab tailored by expansion of CAR-T cells in patients with stable/progressive large B cell lymphoma at lymphodepletion - a phase 2, prospective interventional study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) in stable or progressive disease (SD/PD) at lymphodepletion prior to chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy have an inferior outcome. OBJECTIVE: we hypothesized that enhancing in-vivo expansion of CAR-T cells could overcome this grim prognosis leading to improved outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a phase 2 prospective trial (NCT05385263) investigating the addition of nivolumab to enhance CAR-T cell expansion and response in patients with SD/PD-LBCL. Eligible patients received 1 dose of nivolumab between day +5 and +9 post CAR-T infusion. An additional dose of nivolumab was administered on day +19 only to patients whose CAR-T cell levels in peripheral blood were below 100 cells/µL at day +7. RESULTS: Twenty patients were enrolled and received anti-CD19 CAR-T (Axicabtagene ciloleucel, n=12; tisagenlecleucel, n=8). Eight were ineligible to receive nivolumab due to active CAR-T-associated toxicities. Overall, the protocol was safe. One-month PET-CT showed an 84% overall response rate (complete response, 53%). The cumulative incidence of progression-free survival at 6 and 12 months were 50% (95%CI36%-64%) and 42% (95%CI26%-58%), respectively. The cumulative incidence of overall survival at 6 and 12 months were 85% (95%CI72%-98%) and 51% (95%CI31%-71%), respectively. Nivolumab administration significantly reduced PD-1 expression on all immune cells. CAR-T cell expansion was similar between nivolumab-eligible and non-eligible patients. Notably, there was a significant enrichment of CD45RO-CD27+ CD8+ cells and CD45RO-CD27+ CD8+ CAR-T cells in the nivolumab-eligible group compared to those ineligible, suggesting that specific cell enrichment could potentially contribute to an enhanced response rate. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the addition of nivolumab based on CAR-T cell expansion in patients with SD/PD-LBCL is safe and yields promising early response rates.

Efficacy and safety of different regimens of neoadjuvant therapy in patients with hormone receptor-positive, her2-negative breast cancer: a network meta-analysis.

Introduction: The objective of this systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) is to assess the effectiveness and safety of various neoadjuvant treatment protocols in individuals diagnosed with hormone receptor-positive, her2 negative(HR+/HER2-) breast cancer. Materials and methods: A systematic search was conducted in four databases (Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and CENTRAL) from the inception of the databases to January 16, 2024, to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to various neoadjuvant therapy options in patients diagnosed with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. A network meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate pathological complete response (pCR). Results: There were 17 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) included in the analysis. These trials examined 16 different treatment regimens and involved a total of 5752 participants. The analysis revealed that the six most effective neoadjuvant treatment regimens for HR+/HER2- breast cancer were: CT(A)+olaparib (82.5%), CT(A)+nivolumab (76.5%), Com (74.9%), CT (72.1%), Mono+eribulin (72.0%), and CT(A)+pembrolizumab (70.4%).Paired meta-analysis for pathological complete response (pCR) found no statistically significant distinction between treatment regimens that included both anthracycline and immunosuppressants and regimens that relied solely on anthracycline chemotherapy(OR:1.14, 95%ci 0.79-1.64, I2 = 71%, P=0.50). Similarly, there was no significant difference between platinum-based chemotherapy and anthracycline-basedchemotherapy(OR:1.37, 95%ci 0.53- 3.56, I2 = 11%, P=0.52). With regards to safety, adverse effects of grade 3-5 were observed, which included haematological toxicity, gastrointestinal reactions, skin and mucous membrane reactions, neuropathy, hepatotoxicity, and cardiac disorders. Conclusions: The CT(A)+Olaparib and CT(A)+nivolumab groups demonstrated superior efficacy in neoadjuvant therapy for HR+/HER2- breast cancer. Furthermore, it is crucial to focus on effectively managing the adverse effects of the treatment plan to enhance patient's ability to tolerate it. Given the constraints of the current research, additional well-executed and suitable RCTs are necessary to validate the findings of this investigation. Although pCR is valuable in assessing the effect of neoadjuvant therapy in some cases, prognostic prediction and efficacy assessment in patients with HR+/HER2- breast cancer should be based on a combination of broader clinical and biological characteristics. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42024534539, CRD42024501740.

Stage IV gastric cancer with microsatellite instability-high achieving long-term survival by gastrectomy after nivolumab as third-line therapy: a case report and literature review.

BACKGROUND: The prognosis for stage IV gastric cancer remains poor; however, the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) such as nivolumab has increased the number of patients with long-term survival. Patients with microsatellite instability (MSI)-high gastric cancer have been recognized as a highly effective population for ICIs. Herein, we report a patient with MSI-high advanced gastric cancer treated with gastrectomy after the administration of nivolumab as third-line therapy. CASE PRESENTATION: A 73-year-old woman presented with a type 3 tumor in the lower part of the gastric body, which was diagnosed as gastric cancer through biopsy. Staging laparoscopy revealed that the tumor had invaded the pancreas and the posterior lobe of the transverse mesocolon, and disseminated nodules were found near the ligament of Treitz. After 4 courses of S-1 plus cisplatin therapy, laparoscopic gastrojejunal bypass was performed because of difficulty in oral intake. She received S-1 plus oxaliplatin therapy after a gastrojejunal bypass; however, her regional lymph nodes were enlarged. After six courses of paclitaxel plus ramucirumab as second-line chemotherapy, computed tomography (CT) showed exacerbation of peritoneal dissemination; thus, nivolumab was selected as the third-line therapy. The tumor was characterized by MSI-high. At 24 courses, CT and gastroscopy revealed a complete clinical response of the tumor; however, re-growth of the primary tumor was observed at 36 courses. The patient underwent distal gastrectomy with D1 + lymph node dissection, and received S-1 monotherapy as adjuvant therapy for 1 year. No recurrence was noted at 39 months after the surgery. CONCLUSIONS: We report a patient with highly advanced gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination, which worsened during second-line therapy and was successfully treated with gastrectomy after nivolumab administration as a third-line therapy. MSI-high gastric cancer is a target that should be actively considered for the administration of ICIs, such as nivolumab, and multidisciplinary treatment combined with chemotherapy and gastrectomy, including conversion surgery, can lead to patients' long-term survival.

A Potential Role for Nivolumab in the Treatment of Fibrous Dysplasia-Related Pain.

Fibrous dysplasia (FD) is a chronic and progressive disorder of bone growth because of decreased osteoblast formation and osteoclast overactivity. Its main symptoms include pain, fracture, and irregular bone growth. Bisphosphonates are the mainstay of therapy for FD with a primary goal of pain relief. A 50-year-old woman presented to ophthalmology in March 2011 with intermittent proptosis, vertical diplopia, and orbital pain. A computed tomography scan of the head revealed a skull base lesion, which was confirmed to be fibrous dysplasia on bone biopsy. Because of significant headache, she was treated with IV pamidronate monthly starting November 2011, which led to pain reduction. Repeated attempts to decrease the frequency of pamidronate were unsuccessful because of breakthrough pain. Oral alendronate and risedronate did not control her symptoms. She remained on risedronate however because of its convenience. In August 2021, she was diagnosed with metastatic melanoma and started nivolumab. Her headache completely resolved for the first time in 10 years. Although nivolumab, a programmed death-1 blocker, has been used in the treatment of bone malignancy, it has not been previously studied in FD. By suppressing RANK ligand-related osteoclastogenesis, nivolumab decreases cancer-associated bone pain. Our case suggests a potential role for nivolumab in treating FD-associated pain.

Measurement of changes in serum-based inflammatory indicators to monitor response to nivolumab monotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: a multicenter retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Nonresectable gastric cancer develops rapidly; thus, monitoring disease progression especially in patients receiving nivolumab as late-line therapy is important. Biomarkers may facilitate the evaluation of nivolumab treatment response. Herein, we assessed the utility of serum-based inflammatory indicators for evaluating tumor response to nivolumab. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective cohort study included 111 patients treated with nivolumab monotherapy for nonresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer from October 2017 to October 2021. We measured changes in the C-reactive protein (CRP)-to-albumin ratio (CAR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in serum from baseline to after the fourth administration of nivolumab. Furthermore, we calculated the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC ROCs) for CAR, PLR, and NLR to identify the optimal cutoff values for treatment response. We also investigated the relationship between clinicopathologic factors and disease control (complete response, partial response, and stable disease) using the chi-squared test. RESULTS: The overall response rate (complete and partial response) was 11.7%, and the disease control rate was 44.1%. The median overall survival (OS) was 14.0 (95% CI 10.7‒19.2) months, and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.1 (95% CI 3.0‒5.9) months. The AUC ROCs for CAR, PLR, and NLR before nivolumab monotherapy for patients with progressive disease (PD) were 0.574 (95% CI, 0.461‒0.687), 0.528 (95% CI, 0.418‒0.637), and 0.511 (95% CI, 0.401‒0.620), respectively. The values for changes in CAR, PLR, and NLR were 0.766 (95% CI, 0.666‒0.865), 0.707 (95% CI, 0.607‒0.807), and 0.660 (95% CI 0.556‒0.765), respectively. The cutoff values for the treatment response were 3.0, 1.3, and 1.4 for CAR, PLR, and NLR, respectively. The PFS and OS were significantly longer when the treatment response values for changes in CAR, PLR, and NLR were below these cutoff values (CAR: OS, p < 0.0001 and PFS, p < 0.0001; PLR: OS, p = 0.0289 and PFS, p = 0.0302; and NLR: OS, p = 0.0077 and PFS, p = 0.0044). CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of the changes in CAR, PLR, and NLR could provide a simple, prompt, noninvasive method to evaluate response to nivolumab monotherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered with number K2023006.

Multiorgan transplant for therapy-associated lung and liver failure in a patient with stage III lung cancer.

Immunotherapy can significantly improve efficacy of cancer treatments. For locally advanced stage III lung cancers, chemoimmunotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting can achieve complete pathological response in about 40% of cases. However, optimal cancer response in patients receiving immunotherapy is sometimes associated with potentially fatal bystander injury to lung and liver. We report a successful combined double lung and liver transplantation for immunotherapy-associated respiratory failure and cirrhosis in a patient with advanced lung cancer. A 68-year-old man with stage IIIA squamous cell lung cancer encountered severe interstitial pneumonitis and nodular regenerative hyperplasia of the liver following systemic anticancer therapy that included immunotherapy and platinum-based chemotherapy. These adverse events culminated into fulminant end-stage pulmonary fibrosis and cirrhosis, which were treated with simultaneous lung and liver transplantation, complete resection of lung cancer, and mediastinal lymphadenectomy. The patient demonstrated promising early outcomes without recurrence of cancer at 12 months. Given that oncologic treatments can induce irreversible solid organ failure despite cancer control, our report suggests that in carefully selected patients without systemic metastasis and in whom complete resection of residual cancer can be performed, organ transplantation can be life-saving.

Cost-effectiveness of nivolumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin as first-line treatment for advanced urothelial carcinoma in China and the United States.

Objective: Nivolumab, recently proven in a phase 3 clinical trial (CheckMate 901) to enhance survival when combined with gemcitabine-cisplatin for advanced urothelial carcinoma. This study aimed to assess its cost-effectiveness against gemcitabine-cisplatin alone, from US and Chinese payers' perspectives. Methods: A partitioned survival model was established to assess the life-years, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), lifetime costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of nivolumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin versus gemcitabine-cisplatin alone as first-line treatment for advanced urothelial carcinoma. Univariate, two-way, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the model's robustness. Additionally, subgroup analyses were performed. Results: Nivolumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin and gemcitabine-cisplatin achieved survival benefits of 4.238 life-years and 2.979 life-years for patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma, respectively. Compared with gemcitabine-cisplatin, nivolumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin resulted in ICERs of $116,856/QALY in the US and $51,997/QALY in China. The probabilities of achieving cost-effectiveness at the current willingness-to-pay thresholds were 77.5% in the US and 16.5% in China. Cost-effectiveness could be reached if the price of nivolumab were reduced to $920.87/100mg in China. Subgroup analyses indicated that the combination had the highest probability of cost-effectiveness in patients under 65 or with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance-status score of 0 in the US and China. Conclusion: Nivolumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin first-line treatment for advanced urothelial carcinoma results in longer life expectancy than gemcitabine-cisplatin, but is not cost-effective in China at current price. However, cost-effectiveness is likely to be achieved in most patient subgroups in the US.

Five-year outcomes with first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab with 2 cycles of chemotherapy versus 4 cycles of chemotherapy alone in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer in the randomized CheckMate 9LA trial.

BACKGROUND: We report 5-year efficacy and safety outcomes from CheckMate 9LA in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) and exploratory analyses in key patient subgroups. METHODS: Adults with stage IV/recurrent NSCLC and no sensitizing EGFR/ALK alterations were randomized to receive nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy (n = 361) or chemotherapy (n = 358). Outcomes were assessed in all randomized patients and subgroups. RESULTS: With 57.3 months' minimum follow-up, patients continued to derive overall survival (OS) benefit with nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy over chemotherapy (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.62-0.85; 5-year OS rates, 18% vs. 11%), regardless of tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression (PD-L1 < 1%, 22% vs. 8%; PD-L1 ≥ 1%, 18% vs. 11%), histology (squamous, 18% vs. 7%; non-squamous, 19% vs. 12%), or presence of baseline brain metastases (20% vs. 6%). Five-year duration of response (DOR) rates were 19% versus 8% with nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy, with consistent benefit across subgroups. Patients who discontinued nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy due to treatment-related adverse events had a 5-year OS rate of 37%. Five-year progression-free survival and DOR rates in 5-year survivors were 55% versus 38% and 59% versus 46%, respectively. No new safety signals were observed in 5-year survivors, regardless of the number of ipilimumab doses received. CONCLUSION: This 5-year update supports the long-term, durable OS benefit and improved 5-year survivorship with nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy over chemotherapy in patients with mNSCLC, regardless of tumor PD-L1 expression or histology. GOV REGISTRATION: NCT03215706.

The efficacy of second-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor for patients with metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma following first-line immune-oncology combination therapy.

PURPOSE: Metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) is a heterogeneous disease with a poor prognosis and is treated with immunotherapy (IO)-based combinations according to the clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs), such as cabozantinib and axitinib, are commonly used as the 2nd line therapy after 1st line IO combination therapy, but their efficacy as 2nd line TKI therapy for nccRCC is unknown. In this study, we performed a retrospective multicenter analysis of nccRCC patients who were previously treated with IO combination therapy and received 2nd line TKIs. METHODS: Among 254 patients enrolled in the Japanese multicenter retrospective study, 52 patients with nccRCC histology who received second-line TKIs were included in this study. Progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) from 2nd line TKIs were analyzed by log-rank test and Cox-proportional hazard model. Objective response rate (ORR) of 2nd line TKIs were analyzed. RESULTS: The 1-year PFS and OS rates were 25.0% (95% CI = 13.1-36.8) and 63.8% (95% CI, 48.0-75.9), respectively. No patients had a complete response, 11 had a partial response, and 18 had stable disease. ORR was 21.1%. IMDC poor risk and sunitinib as the 2nd line therapy were significantly associated with poor PFS. CONCLUSION: The 2nd-line TKI was effective for a small group of nccRCC patients previously treated with IO combination therapy, although this study was retrospectively analyzed with a small number of cases.

Clinical features, treatment, and outcome of nivolumab-induced cholangitis.

BACKGROUND: Cholangitis is an uncommon and severe adverse reaction of nivolumab with unclear clinical features. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinicopathological features, imaging, and treatment of nivolumab-induced cholangitis. METHODS: Case reports, case series, and clinical studies of nivolumab-induced cholangitis were retrospectively analyzed by searching Chinese and English databases from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2023. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients entered the study. The median number of cycles of cholangitis onset was seven cycles after administration (range 1, 28) and the median time was 11 days (range 78, 390). Abdominal pain (42.1%) and fever (18.4%) were the most important initial symptoms. Some patients (15.8%) showed elevated liver enzymes without any clinical symptoms. The median alkaline phosphatase level was 1721 IU/L (range 126, 9118), and the median γ-glutamyltranspeptidase level was 829 IU/L (range 104, 3442). Anti-nuclear antibodies, anti-mitochondrial antibodies, and IgG4 typically show negative results. Imaging shows extrahepatic bile duct and intrahepatic bile duct dilation, hypertrophy, and stenosis. Liver biopsy and biliary tract biopsy mainly found CD8 inflammatory cell infiltration. Systemic steroids (84.2%) and ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) (34.2%) were administered, and 24 patients (63.2%) had poor to moderate response to steroids. Thirty-one patients (81.6%) improved and seven patients (18.4%) did not improve. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians must remain vigilant for patients experiencing cholestasis while on nivolumab and should assess for cholangitis and carry out appropriate imaging tests. Considering the excellent efficacy of UCDA in cholangitis, steroids combined with UDCA may be a viable treatment option in cases where steroids are ineffective for cholangitis.

Subcutaneous versus intravenous nivolumab for renal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The evolving oncology treatment paradigm has created an unmet need for administration options that improve patient experiences and health care efficiencies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: CheckMate 67T (NCT04810078) was a phase III, open-label, multicenter, noninferiority trial in which patients with advanced/metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma were randomized to subcutaneous nivolumab (1200 mg every 4 weeks; coformulated with recombinant human hyaluronidase PH20 20 000 units) or intravenous nivolumab (3 mg/kg every 2 weeks). The primary objective was to assess the noninferiority of subcutaneous versus intravenous nivolumab by coprimary endpoints determined from a population pharmacokinetics analysis [time-averaged serum concentration over the first 28 days (Cavgd28), and minimum steady-state serum concentration (Cminss); noninferiority threshold: lower boundary of 90% confidence interval (CI) of the geometric mean ratios (GMR) ≥0.8]. Objective response rate (ORR) was a key secondary endpoint powered for noninferiority [noninferiority threshold: lower boundary of 95% CI of relative risk of ORR (subcutaneous versus intravenous nivolumab) ≥0.60]. RESULTS: Overall, 495 patients were randomized. Relative exposure in the subcutaneous versus intravenous arm reported by the GMR of Cavgd28 and Cminss was 2.098 (90% CI 2.001-2.200) and 1.774 (90% CI 1.633-1.927), respectively. After 8 months of minimum follow-up, ORR was 24.2% with subcutaneous nivolumab (95% CI 19.0%-30.0%) versus 18.2% with intravenous nivolumab [95% CI 13.6%-23.6%; relative risk: 1.33 (95% CI 0.94-1.87)]. Coprimary endpoints and ORR met noninferiority thresholds. Additional efficacy and safety measures were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Subcutaneous nivolumab was noninferior to intravenous nivolumab based on pharmacokinetics and ORR. No new safety signals were observed.