Unilateral lupus mastitis.

Lupus mastitis is a rare clinical manifestation associated with systemic lupus erythematosus or discoid lupus erythematosus. It is necessary to make a correct diagnosis to differentiate it from inflammatory breast cancer. The histological study shows involvement of the adipose tissue of the breast with histopathological findings of cutaneous lupus erythematosus. Direct immunofluorescence detects the lupus band at the dermal-epidermal junction. The treatment of choice is hydroxychloroquine. We present a case of unilateral lupus mastitis in a patient with no previous diagnosis of lupus with complete remission after the use of hydroxychloroquine and topical corticosteroids.

Patient-reported disease impact of systemic lupus erythematosus with active joint symptoms: Results from the systemic lupus erythematosus-update survey.

BACKGROUND: Many people with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) experience joint pain, swelling, and stiffness. These joint symptoms are associated with problems in physical functioning and work disability. We used survey data from adults with SLE to explore the burden and impact of joint symptoms. METHODS: SLE-UPDATE was a 2019 cross-sectional US survey of adults with SLE. We compared respondents with "currently active" joint symptoms' and those "without currently active" joint symptoms. The active joint cohort comprised survey respondents who self-reported current "stiffness in joints" or "pain/swelling in joints" and who had moderate to severe joint pain (Worst Joint Pain Numeric Rating Scale [NRS] score ≥ 4). Respondents not fulfilling these criteria were included in the non-active joint cohort. Outcomes included frequency and severity of pain, patient-reported outcomes (LupusPRO™ and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Lupus [WPAI-Lupus]), satisfaction with current treatments, and importance of different treatment goals. RESULTS: More respondents in the active joint cohort (N = 285) than in the non-active joint cohort (N = 215) reported pain most or all the time over the preceding 7 days (77.5% vs. 32.1%, p < .0001), fibromyalgia (45% vs. 12%, p < .0001), and higher (worse) mean scores on the Worst Pain NRS (6.5 vs. 4.8, p < .0001) and Worst Joint Pain NRS (6.7 vs. 4.5, p < .0001). Mean Lupus PRO health-related quality of life (HRQoL) total score was lower (worse) in the active joint cohort (48.9 vs. 64.1, p < .0001). WPAI-Lupus scores indicated greater work productivity losses and activity impairment in the active joint cohort. More respondents in the active joint cohort than in the non-active joint cohort were neutral or not satisfied with current treatments and rated reducing pain as a "very important" treatment goal (26.7% vs. 18.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Respondents with SLE and active joint manifestations in addition to having more pain report lower HRQoL and were less satisfied with their current treatments. Comorbid fibromyalgia may play a role in joint symptoms in patient with SLE joint manifestations. There is an unmet need for new therapeutic options to reduce joint symptom burden among patients with SLE.

Drug-induced subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus associated with abatacept.

Numerous drugs have been linked to the induction or exacerbation of systemic cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE). This report presents the third case of the biologic abatacept as an exacerbating medication for SCLE. A 73-year old woman with a remote history of subacute cutaneous lupus and rheumatoid arthritis, well controlled on hydroxychloroquine, presented with worsening annular erythematous, slightly scaly plaques on her forearms and hands. She had been started on abatacept a month prior. She was diagnosed with SCLE exacerbated by abatacept given the clinical findings, time course, and skin biopsy with interface dermatitis. Her skin eruption cleared completely several months later after discontinuing abatacept and switching to tociluzumab, while remaining on hydroxychloroquine. This case highlights the need to consider abatacept as a potential exacerbating medication for SCLE in any patient with a new photodistributed papulosquamous eruption.

Lupus eritematoso cutáneo subagudo.(Presentación de caso clínico) / Subacute Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus.(Presentation of a clinical case)

Resumen El lupus eritematoso (LE) es una enfermedad autoinmunitaria crónica multisistémica con manifestaciones clínicas diversas y complejas. Los síntomas iniciales son inespecíficos. La piel es uno de los sitios más frecuentemente afectados. Su manifestacióncutánea puede presentarse sola o asociada a síntomas sistémicos. Los criterios de clasificación del lupus eritematoso sistémico (LES) han sido redactados anteriormente en tres ocasiones: 1982, 1997 y 2012. En esta revisión del 2019 se toma la presencia del anticuerpo ANA como criterio de entrada más que como criterio de clasificación (Tabla 1). De este modo, se reflejaba mejor la patogénesis subyacente, y se tienen en cuenta las características de los ANA (alta sensibilidad y especificidad limitada). También se pensó en repartir la "importancia" de cada uno de los criterios empleados, así que se empleó una metodología "por pesos" (Tabla 1). Estos criterios constituyen un cambio de paradigma en la clasificación del LES. Tienen además una buena sensibilidad y especificidad, mejorando las cifras de los criterios anteriores. Su tratamiento depende de las manifestaciones clínicas y su abordaje debe ser multidisciplinario. Su supervivencia ha mejorado gracias al diagnóstico y tratamiento precoz. Sin embargo, su pronóstico continúa siendo grave. Esta patología presenta lesiones en órganos específicos, la enfermedad cutánea es una de ellas. La gran mayoría de los pacientes con LE desarrollan lesiones cutáneas en algún momento de la enfermedad y muchas veces suele ser el motivo de consulta del paciente. Cuando afecta a la piel se puede presentar como lupus eritematoso agudo, lupus eritematoso subagudo y lupus eritematoso crónico, esta clasificación está basada en la morfología clínica, la duración media de las lesiones cutáneas y el examen histopatológico. Generalmente el tratamiento para el lupus eritematoso cutáneo, está basado en una foto protección estricta, y como medicamentos de primera elección, por vía oral, los antimaláricos, reconocidos como de utilidad para el control de esta enfermedad.

Abstract Lupus erythematosus (LE) is a multisystemic chronic autoimmune disease with diverse and complex clinical manifestations. The initial symptoms are nonspecific. The skin is one of the most frequently affected sites. Its cutaneous manifestation can appear alone or associated with systemic symptoms. The classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have been previously written on 3 occasions: in 1982, 1997 and 2012. In this revision of 2019, the presence of ANA is taken as an entry criterion rather than as a classification criterion. In this way, the underlying pathogenesis was better reflected, and the characteristics of the ANA (high sensitivity and limited specificity) are taken into account. It was also thought to distribute the "importance" of each of the criteria used, so a "by weight" methodology was used. These criteria constitute a paradigm shift in the classification of the LES. They also have good sensitivity and specificity, improving the figures of the previous criteria. Its treatment depends on the clinical manifestations and its approach must be multidisciplinary. Their survival has improved thanks to early diagnosis and treatment. However, his prognosis remains dire.

Identifying co-morbid fibromyalgia in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus using the Multi-Dimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire.

OBJECTIVE: Fibromyalgia (FM) is prevalent but often under-recognized in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from the Multi-Dimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ) can identify co-morbid FM in patients with rheumatic diseases. The present study examined the utility of the MDHAQ in recognizing FM in patients with SLE during routine consultations. METHODS: Patients with SLE completed an MDHAQ. FM status was determined by the validated 2016 revision of the ACR 2010/2011 preliminary FM criteria. Individual PROs from the MDHAQ and composite Fibromyalgia Assessment Tool (FAST) indices of the discriminatory PROs were compared between patients with and without FM using Student's unpaired t-test and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to determine the area under the curve (AUC). The physician's clinical impression of FM was recorded, and the SLE Disease Activity Index was used to assess disease activity. RESULTS: Of 88 patients with SLE, 23 (26%) satisfied the 2016 FM criteria. The FAST3 composite measure of two out of three of pain (≥6/10), joint count (≥16/48) and symptom checklist (≥16/60) correctly classified 89% of patients (AUC=0.90, kappa=0.71). Physician diagnosis demonstrated moderate agreement with the 2016 FM criteria (kappa=0.43) but missed 43% of patients with FM. In the presence of active disease, the FAST3 correctly classified 91% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Co-morbid FM is prevalent in SLE yet often underdiagnosed by physicians. The simple FAST3 index of the MDHAQ provides an easy-to-use self-reported tool to improve identification of FM in patients with SLE.

Advances in the treatment of cutaneous lupus erythematosus.

Lupus erythematosus (LE) is a multifactorial autoimmune disease with clinical manifestations of differing severity which may present with skin manifestations as primary sign of the disease (cutaneous lupus erythematosus, CLE) or as part of a disease spectrum (systemic lupus erythematosus, SLE). To date, no drugs are approved specifically for the treatment of CLE and only single agents have been applied in randomized controlled trials. Therefore, topical and systemic agents are used "off-label", primarily based on open-label studies, case series, retrospective analyses, and expert opinions. In contrast, several agents, such as hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine, cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, and belimumab, are approved for the treatment of SLE. Recent approaches in the understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of LE enabled the development of further new agents, which target molecules such as interleukin 6 (IL-6) and interferon (IFN). Only single trials, however, applied these new agents in patients with cutaneous involvement of the disease and/or included endpoints which evaluated the efficacy of these agents on skin manifestations. This article provides an updated review on new and recent approaches in the treatment of CLE.

Lupus erythematosus tumidus: a clinical and histological study of 25 cases.

BACKGROUND: Lupus erythematosus tumidus (LET) is a subtype of cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) that has been well characterized in recent years. However, some controversy still remains concerning the histological features of epidermal involvement. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this report is to describe the clinical and microscopic features of LET in patients diagnosed at Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Spain. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 25 patients with a diagnosis of LET. RESULTS: All patients presented with typical LET lesions (smooth, erythematous plaques without macroscopic epidermal changes, such as follicular plugs or scale, that resolved without residual scarring or hypopigmentation). None of the patients fulfilled the criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus during follow-up. Test results for antinuclear antibodies were positive in five patients (20%), with titres below one of 320 in all cases. Twenty-two patients (88%) required antimalarial therapy; response was good in 70% and moderate response in 30%. Minor epidermal alterations were observed in 52% of biopsy specimens, with focal basal vacuolization being the most frequent. CONCLUSIONS: LET is a variant of CLE that has distinctive clinical, histologic and prognostic features. Unlike the patients in the case series previously described in the literature, most of our patients required treatment with antimalarials. Histology revealed mild epidermal alterations in a significant percentage of patients. Thus, in our opinion, the absence of microscopic epidermal alterations is not constant in LET.