Optimal size of Frozenix for true thoracic aneurysms: is downsizing an option?

OBJECTIVE: During total arch replacement (TAR) using frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique with Frozenix for true thoracic aortic aneurysm (tTAA), oversized FET tends to be chosen similar to the endovascular devise selection. However, the oversized FET is considered a risk factor for intimal injury. The appropriate size selection of FET remains insufficiently understood. METHODS: Between October 2014 and March 2022, a total of 49 patients underwent TAR using Frozenix for tTAA. Out of 49 patients, four patients planned to staged surgery were excluded, 19 patients were operated on with an undersized Frozenix compared with the descending aorta (undersized FET group) and in 26 patients an equal or oversized Frozenix was used (oversized FET group). Clinical outcomes and postoperative diameter changes were investigated. RESULTS: In-hospital mortality was 0%. The mean diameter of Frozenix and the descending aorta was 30.7 mm and 28.8 mm, respectively, in the oversized FET group, and 26.7 mm and 30.1 mm in the undersized FET group. Postoperative computed tomography (CT) demonstrated no endoleaks not only in the oversized FET group but also in the undersized FET group. CT also revealed that undersized FET had expanded more than the original diameter in all cases except for two, with an average of 2.47 ± 1.53 mm. Additionally, the descending aorta covered with Frozenix shrank in 10 patients (53%). Postoperative adverse aortic events were not observed. CONCLUSIONS: Undersized Frozenix tightly fit the descending aorta and resulted in complete sealing without endoleaks. Oversized FET is not strictly necessary considering the size-related adverse complications.

Effects of temperature on transient neurologic dysfunction after total arch replacement.

OBJECTIVES: The relationship between cooling status during aortic surgery with hypothermic circulatory arrest and postoperative neurologic dysfunction remains unknown. In the present study, we evaluated the effect of cooling status on transient neurologic dysfunction after total arch replacement. METHODS: We studied patients who underwent elective total arch replacement with hypothermic circulatory arrest and antegrade selective cerebral perfusion from December 2011 to January 2021. Changes in tympanic temperature trends recorded during surgery were plotted. Several parameters, including the nadir temperature, cooling speed, and degree of cooling (cooling area, or the area under the curve of inverted temperature trends from cooling to rewarming as calculated by the integral method), were analyzed. The relationships between these variables and transient neurologic dysfunction were evaluated. RESULTS: Transient neurologic dysfunction was observed in 33 (14.5%) of the 228 included patients. In the transient neurologic dysfunction group, the cooling area was larger (2417.3 vs. 1920.8 °C min; P < 0.001) and the cooling speed was higher (0.68 vs. 0.51 °C/min; P < 0.001) than in the non-transient neurologic dysfunction group. A multivariate logistic model revealed that both the cooling area (odds ratio = 1.13 per 100 °C min; P < 0.001) and cooling speed (odds ratio = 3.69 per °C/min; P = 0.041) were independent risk factors for transient neurologic dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Both the cooling area, which indicates the degree of cooling, and cooling speed had significant relationships with transient neurologic dysfunction after total arch replacement. Together, these findings indicate that overcooling and rapid cooling may contribute to brain injury.

Cerebral Protection With Deep Hypothermic Circulatory Arrest During Total Arch Replacement Using the Arch-First Technique for Acute Aortic Dissection.

OBJECTIVES: Stroke remains a serious complication after total arch replacement (TAR). To prevent this, deep hypothermia is commonly employed during TAR. We evaluated the effectiveness of cerebral protection using deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) during TAR with the arch-first technique, focusing particularly on patients with acute aortic dissection (AAD). METHODS: This retrospective study included 109 consecutive patients with AAD who underwent emergency TAR using the arch-first technique under DHCA, and 147 patients with non-ruptured aneurysm who underwent scheduled TAR using the same technique between October 2009 and July 2022. We reviewed these patients for major adverse events, including stroke and 30-day mortality after surgery. We also analyzed the impact of clinical variables and anatomical features on the occurrence of newly developed stroke after TAR in patients with AAD. RESULTS: A newly developed stroke after TAR occurred in 11 (10.1%) patients with AAD. These were attributed to embolism in eight patients, malperfusion in two patients (including one who had been comatose), and low output syndrome in one patient. A stroke occurred in 3 (2.0%) patients with aneurysm, all due to embolism (P = 0.005). The DHCA time was 37 ± 7 minutes for patients with AAD and 36 ± 6 minutes for patients with aneurysm (P = 0.122). The 30-day mortality rate was 10 (9.2%) for patients with AAD and 2 (1.4%) for patients with aneurysm (P = 0.003). In our multivariable analysis, arch vessel dissection with a patent false lumen (double-barreled dissection) was the only significant predictor of newly developed stroke after TAR for AAD (odds ratio, 33.02; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with aneurysm undergoing TAR using the arch-first technique under DHCA experienced significantly better outcomes, in terms of newly developed stroke and 30-day mortality, than those with AAD. Cerebral protection with DHCA during TAR using the arch-first technique continues to be a viable option. Newly developed stroke in patients undergoing TAR for AAD appears to be associated with air emboli deriving from the residual dissection with a patent false lumen in the repaired arch vessels.

Reverse cannulation method as a strategy for aortic aneurysm surgery: A computational fluid dynamics study on minimizing neurological risks.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the blood flow velocity and wall shear stress in total arch replacement with a "shaggy" aorta, using computational fluid dynamics, and determine the optimal cannulation method. METHODS: A patient-specific aortic arch aneurysm model was constructed by using computed tomography scans. Three cannulas were assessed, as follows: dispersive with a steep angle, dispersive with a gentle angle, and the endo-hole type. The cannula tips were oriented toward the aortic arch (standard direction) and aortic root (reversed direction), with an ideal angle (base orientation: 0°), tip orientations rotated 20° clockwise and counterclockwise from the base orientation. The variables of interest included the blood flow velocity, streamlines, wall shear stress, and flow distribution. RESULTS: The standard direction resulted in variable accelerated flow and wall shear stress locations based on cannula tip orientation, leading to unstable cerebral branch flow. Minor deviation in the cannula tip angle and cannula type led to significant alterations in flow distribution. Conversely, in the reverse direction for all cannulas, no accelerated blood flow was observed in the proximal aortic arch or cerebral vessel ostia even with angular adjustments, helping maintain a stable cerebral branch flow. Minimal variation in blood flow distribution was observed across all cannula types and angles. CONCLUSIONS: Our simulations indicate that, irrespective of the cannula type or orientation, directing the cannula tip toward the aortic root (reversed direction) prevents accelerated blood flow in critical areas, suggesting its potential as an optimal approach for aortic arch surgery in "shaggy" aorta cases.

Comprehensive Treatment of Total Arch Replacement in a Patient With Liver Cirrhosis: A Case Report.

A 78-year-old woman with liver cirrhosis due to chronic hepatitis C visited our department for treatment of a thoracic aortic aneurysm. Her Child-Pugh classification was class A, and her model for end-stage liver (MELD) disease score was 8. As she also had thrombocytopenia associated with splenomegaly and esophageal varices, endoscopic injection sclerotherapy and partial splenic embolization were performed before total arch replacement surgery for treating esophageal varices to reduce the bleeding risk during transesophageal echocardiography and for thrombocytopenia, respectively. After endoscopic injection sclerotherapy and partial splenic embolization, the platelet count increased; hence, total arch replacement surgery was performed. By combining partial splenic embolization and endoscopic injection sclerotherapy, we were able to safely perform transesophageal echocardiography and total arch replacement surgery in the perioperative period.

Tailored surgical strategies for mini-access open total arch repair.

Objective: Open arch repair is perceived as a challenging, high-risk procedure, with a barrier against the use of a minimally invasive approach. We aimed to present a mini-access total arch replacement performed by stratified approaches and to evaluate perioperative outcomes to contribute to the body of evidence. Methods: We evaluated 40 consecutive patients (aged 69.5 years; interquartile range, 65.6-76.3 years) undergoing elective total arch replacement using 5- to 8-cm upper mini-sternotomy between 2018 and 2022. Surgical strategies, including arterial inflow site and methods of branching vessel reconstruction, were systematically selected at the individual level. To evaluate comparative outcomes, contemporary cases undergoing total arch replacement via sternotomy with similar eligibility criteria served as a control group, and the inverse-treatment-weighting method was used to adjust for baseline characteristics. Results: Arch-first anastomosis using trifurcate graft, distal-first anastomosis using 4-branch graft, and island anastomosis were used in 18 (45%), 12 (30.0%), and 10 (25%) patients, respectively. Lower body and cardiac ischemic times were 23.4 minutes (interquartile range, 18.0-29.0 minutes) and 66.7 minutes (interquartile range, 50.1-78.2 minutes). There was no early (30-day or in-hospital) mortality, and 2 patients experienced disabling stroke (5.0%). The contemporary control group comprised 55 patients. After an adjustment, a mini-access group showed lower risks of stroke (odds ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.78-1.00; P = .049) and a composite of major complications (odds ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.68-0.92; P = .003), compared with a sternotomy approach. Conclusions: Based on present results, mini-access total arch replacement may be performed with reasonable safety and efficiency.

Two-stage hybrid surgical repair for aortic arch pathology with a shaggy aorta: a case report.

BACKGROUND: The surgical treatment strategy for aortic arch pathology with a shaggy aorta must be determined on a case-by-case basis because of the risk of catastrophic complications, such as brain infarction and spinal cord injury. CASE PRESENTATION: This report describes the surgical case of two saccular aneurysms of the arch and abdominal aorta associated with a shaggy aorta in a 63-year-old man who underwent total arch replacement and secondary thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Considering the risk of embolization during endovascular therapy, graft replacement for the abdominal aortic aneurysm was initially performed. On postoperative day 28, total arch replacement with the conventional elephant trunk was performed using the functional brain isolation technique, which involves manipulating places far from the atherosclerotic burden, such as arterial inflow for cardiopulmonary bypass and unclamping of neck vessels. On postoperative day 7 after total arch replacement, thoracic endovascular aortic repair was performed across the conventional elephant trunk in the nondiseased descending aorta. No postoperative complications, such as cerebrovascular failure, paraplegia, or embolization to abdominal viscera or lower extremities, occurred. The patient remained asymptomatic. CONCLUSIONS: The present case suggests that total arch replacement with the conventional elephant trunk and secondary thoracic endovascular aortic repair may be an effective alternative for aortic arch pathology with a shaggy aorta. The strategy for surgical treatment in patients with aortic arch pathologies with a shaggy aorta must be judged on a case-by-case basis, considering patient characteristics, comorbidities, and preoperative evaluation using transesophageal echocardiography and computed tomography angiography, to eliminate potential determinants of intraoperative stroke.

Major adverse outcomes in patients with acute type A aortic dissection undergoing total arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk procedure.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this investigation was to identify the risk factors linked to major adverse outcomes (MAO) subsequent to total arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk procedure (TAR+FET) surgery among patients diagnosed with acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD). Additionally, the study aimed to elucidate the influence of these adverse outcomes on the long-term prognosis of the patients. METHOD: 670 ATAAD patients received the TAR+FET procedure. Multivariable logistic regression was used to investigate the risk factors associated with in-hospital MAO. Additionally, long-term survival outcomes were assessed through follow-up observations of all patients. RESULTS: The overall in-hospital mortality was 4.33%. Among 670 patients, 169 patients (25.22%) developed postoperative MAO. Multivariate analysis showed that in-hospital MAO was positively associated with age (OR = 1.025, 95%CI: 1.005-1.045, P = 0.014), lower limb symptoms (OR = 2.562, 95%CI: 1.407-4.666, P = 0.002), involvement of coronary artery (OR = 2.027, 95%CI: 1.312-3.130, P = 0.001), involvement of left renal artery (OR = 1.998, 95%CI: 1.359-2.938, P < 0.001), CPB time (OR = 1.011, 95%CI: 1.007-1.015, P < 0.001) and WBC counts (OR = 1.045, 95%CI: 1.007-1.083, P = 0.019). MAO group showed a worse long-term prognosis than those non-MAO group (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: While TAR+FET can be an effective treatment option for ATAAD patients, careful patient selection and management are essential in minimizing the risk of MAO and ensuring long-term success.

Open, endovascular or hybrid repair of aortic arch disease: narrative review of diverse strategies with diverse options.

OBJECTIVES: The management of aortic arch disease is complex. Open surgical management continues to evolve, and the introduction of endovascular repair is revolutionizing aortic arch surgery. Although these innovative techniques have generated the opportunity for better outcomes in select patients, they have also introduced confusion and uncertainty regarding best practices. METHODS: In New York, we developed a collaborative group, the New York Aortic Consortium, as a means of cross-linking knowledge and working together to better understand and treat aortic disease. In our meeting in May 2023, regional aortic experts and invited international experts discussed the contemporary management of aortic arch disease, differences in interpretation of the available literature and the integration of endovascular technology into disease management. We summarized the current state of aortic arch surgery in this review article. RESULTS: Approaches to aortic arch repair have evolved substantially, whether it be methods to reduce cerebral ischaemia, improve haemostasis, simplify future operations or expand options for high-risk patients with endovascular approaches. However, the transverse aortic arch remains challenging to repair. Among our collaborative group of cardiac/aortic surgeons, we discovered a wide disparity in our practice patterns and our management strategies of patients with aortic arch disease. CONCLUSIONS: It is important to build unique institutional expertise in the context of complex and evolving management of aortic arch disease with open surgery, endovascular repair and hybrid approaches, tailored to the risk profiles and anatomical specifics of individual patients.

Giant Aneurysm of Ascending Aorta and Aortic Arch: A Report of a Rare Case.

A thoracic aortic aneurysm is considered giant when its diameter exceeds 10 cm. We report a rare case of a giant aneurysm involving the ascending aorta and aortic arch in a 40-year-old man, initially diagnosed as an acute aortic dissection. The patient underwent emergency surgery, during which the ascending aorta and aortic arch were replaced under deep hypothermia and circulatory arrest with selective antegrade cerebral perfusion. Strong teamwork resulted in a favorable postoperative course for the patient.

Huge, Infected Pancreatic Necrosis After Total Arch Replacement in a Patient With Immunoglobulin G4-Related Syndrome.

A 77-year-old male patient with immunoglobulin (Ig)G4-related disease was diagnosed with a 60-mm aortic arch aneurysm and atherosclerosis of the aorta advanced throughout the body. Aortic arch replacement surgery was performed with circulatory arrest at 28°C. One week later, the patient developed acute pancreatitis, followed by encapsulated necrosis in the chronic phase. After debridement surgery, the patient's condition improved.

Surgical Treatment for Type A Aortic Dissection after Endovascular Aortic Repair: A 12-year, Single-Center Study.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate the clinical manifestations, operative techniques, and outcomes of patients who undergo open repair after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). METHODS: From January 2010 to June 2022, 113 consecutive type A aortic dissection (TAAD) patients underwent secondary open operation after TEVAR at our institution, and the median interval from primary intervention to open surgery was 12 (1.9-48.0) months. We divided the patients into two groups (RTAD (retrograde type A dissection) group, N = 56; PNAD (proximal new aortic dissection) group, N = 57) according to their anatomical features. Survival analysis during the follow-up was evaluated using a Kaplan-Meier survival curve and a log-rank test. RESULTS: The 30-day mortality was 6.2% (7/113), the median follow-up period was 31.7 (IQR 14.7-65.6) months, and the overall survival at 1 year, 5 years, and 10 years was 88.5%, 88.5%, and 87.6%, respectively. Fourteen deaths occurred during the follow-up, but there were no late aorta-related deaths. Three patients underwent total thoracoabdominal aortic replacement 1 year after a second open operation. The RTAD group had a smaller ascending aorta size (42.5 ± 7.7 mm vs 48.4 ± 11.4 mm; P < .01) and a closer proximal landing zone (P < .01) compared to the PNAD group. However, there were no differences in survival between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: TAAD can present as an early or a late complication after TEVAR due to stent-grafting-related issues or disease progression. Open operation can be performed to treat TAAD, and this has acceptable early and mid-term outcomes. Follow-up should become mandatory for patients after TEVAR because these patients are at increased risk for TAAD.

One-year outcomes of total arch replacement and frozen elephant trunk using the E-vita Open NEO.

OBJECTIVES: In this cohort study, we aimed to assess the 1-year clinical outcomes of using the E-vita Open NEO™ hybrid prosthesis for total arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk (FET) to repair extensive aortic pathologies. METHODS: We reviewed individuals who underwent thoracic aortic surgery between April 2021 and March 2023 from the Gangnam Severance Aortic Registry. Exclusion criteria included ascending aortic replacement, 1 or 2 partial arch replacement, descending aortic replacement and total arch replacement without an FET. Finally, all consecutive patients who underwent total arch replacement and FET with E-vita Open NEO for aortic arch pathologies between April 2021 and March 2023 were included in this cohort study. The patients were divided into 3 groups based on their pathology: acute aortic dissection, chronic aortic dissection and thoracic aortic aneurysm. The primary end point was in-hospital mortality. The secondary end points during the postoperative period comprised stroke, spinal cord injury and redo sternotomy for bleeding. Additionally, the secondary end points during the follow-up period included the 1-year survival rate, 1-year freedom from all aortic procedures and 1-year freedom from unplanned aortic interventions. RESULTS: The study included 167 patients in total: 92 patients (55.1%) with acute aortic dissection, 20 patients (12.0%) with chronic aortic dissection and 55 patients (32.9%) with thoracic aortic aneurysm. The in-hospital mortality was 1.8% (n = 3). Strokes occurred in 1.8% (n = 3) of the patients, spinal cord injury in 1.8% (n = 3) and redo sternotomy for bleeding was performed in 3.0% (n = 5). There were no significant differences between the pathological groups. The median follow-up period (quartile 1-quartile 3) was 198 (37-373) days, with 1-year survival rates of 95.9%. At 1 year, the freedom from all aortic procedures and unplanned aortic interventions were 90.3% and 92.0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The 1-year clinical outcomes of total arch replacement with FET using the E-vita Open NEO were favourable. Long-term follow-up is required to evaluate the durability of the FET.

Strategy for acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection considering midterm results: a retrospective cohort study comparing ascending aortic replacement and total arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk technique.

BACKGROUND: Acute type A aortic dissection is treated with an emergency procedure that uses ascending aortic replacement (AAR). However, to avoid a residual dissected aorta with a false lumen, total arch replacement (TAR) is required. The frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique is a promising surgical approach that promotes false lumen obliteration in a single step. Therefore, this retrospective single-center study aimed to evaluate the operative outcomes of AAR and TAR with FET. METHODS: Between 2007 and 2021, 143 patients with acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection underwent a central repair using AAR (n = 95) or TAR with FET (n = 43). All perioperative variables, the duration of all-cause mortality, and aortic events defined as dilatation of the distal aorta > 5 cm, new occurrences of aortic dissection, distal aortic surgery, and distal aortic rupture were recorded. We compared these perioperative variables and mid-term results with an additional focus on distal aortic events. RESULTS: Patient background data did not differ between the two groups. Perioperative results for the TAR with FET group vs the AAR group showed similar operative times (306 vs 298 min, P = 0.862), but the TAR group had longer cardiopulmonary bypass times (154 vs 179 min, P < 0.001). The freedom from all-cause death for the TAR vs AAR groups using the Kaplan-Meier method was 81.9% vs 85.4% and 78.0% vs 85.4% (P = 0.407) at 1 and 3 years, respectively. Freedom from aorta-related events was 90.6% vs 97.6% and 69.3% vs 87.0% (P = 0.034) at 1 and 3 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: TAR with FET had comparable perioperative results to AAR in acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection and was considered a valuable method to avoid aorta-related events in the midterm.

Comparison of the outcomes between total arch replacement and nontotal arch replacement in patients with acute type A aortic dissection.

Objective: To compare the outcomes between total arch replacement (TAR) and nontotal arch replacement (non-TAR) in patients with acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD). Methods: Between 2006 and 2018, 275 ATAAD patients were divided into 2 groups, the TAR group (n = 63) and the non-TAR group (n = 212), and multiple variables were analyzed. Results: The TAR patients were older than the non-TAR patients (61.5 ± 11.8 vs. 57.4 ± 14.5 years, p = 0.024). The TAR group had longer operative, cardiopulmonary bypass, aortic clamping, and circulatory arrest times than the non-TAR group (all p < 0.001). The overall hospital mortality rate was 8.7% with no statistically significant difference between the TAR and non-TAR groups (9.5% vs. 8.5%, p = 0.799). There was no significant difference in the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI), intubation time, incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation (AF), or reoperation for bleeding or reintervention rates between the TAR and non-TAR groups (68.3% vs. 65.7% (p = 0.912), 44.8% vs. 33.8% (p = 0.127), 30.2% vs. 22.6% (p = 0.222), 9.5% vs. 9.5% (p = 0.189), and 7.9% vs. 7.1% (p = 0.077), respectively). The TAR group had a higher rate of new permanent neurological deficit (PND) than the non-TAR group and longer median length of hospital stay (17.5% vs. 6.1% (p < 0.001) and 9 vs. 12 days (p = 0.049), respectively). TAR (relative risk (RR) 3.66, p = 0.005) and preoperative cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) (RR 6.60, p = 0.019) were risk factors of PND. Survival rate was similar between the two groups. Conclusion: The mortality rates in ATAAD patients with TAR and non-TAR were similar. However, the incidence of new permanent postoperative neurological deficit was significantly higher, and the length of hospital stay was longer in patients with TAR. TAR in ATAAD should be avoided especially in patients who have experienced preoperative CPR to abate risk of PND.

Total arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk technique for Kommerell's diverticulum with a right-sided aortic arch and aberrant left subclavian artery.

BACKGROUND: Kommerell's diverticulum with a right-sided aortic arch and aberrant left subclavian artery is uncommon. We perforemed a single-stage procedure with the frozen elephant trunk technique. CASE PRESENTATION: A 62-year-old man underwent aortic dissection a year ago, and computerized tomographic angiography performed at that time revealed a right aortic arch, Kommerell's diverticulum (42 mm), and an aberrant left subclavian artery. We performed one-stage repair through median sternotomy. The cervical branches were exposed during the operation, and a deep hypothermic circulatory arrest with antegrade cerebral perfusion was established. The aorta was transected distally to the origin of the left carotid artery. We inserted a stent graft into the aorta, followed by peripheral anastomosis using a premade 5-branch Dacron graft. The right subclavian artery and the aorta were reconstructed, and the remaining cervical branches were reconstructed after the cross-clamp had been released. CONCLUSIONS: Total arch replacement through median sternotomy was performed for the right aortic arch, Kommerell's diverticulum, and aberrant left subclavian artery. The frozen elephant trunk technique is allowed to perform a one-stage operation safely.

Aortoesophageal fistula treated using one-stage total reconstruction: a case report from a high-volume center.

BACKGROUND: Aortoesophageal fistula (AEF) is a rare but typically life-threatening condition. Although several treatment strategies exist, including conservative treatment with intraluminal stent graft and open thoracic aortic replacement, the overall outcome remains poor, ranging from 16 to 39%. Furthermore, esophageal reconstruction methods vary between hospitals. Herein, we report a case of aortoesophageal fistula treated using one-stage total reconstruction. CASE PRESENTATION: This case involved a 58-year-old woman who developed acute type A aortic dissection and underwent successful total arch replacement at the other hospital. However, she developed AEF 1 year later and underwent urgent thoracic endovascular aortic repair, which eventually failed. We performed thoracic aortic replacement, total esophagectomy, gastric tube reconstruction, and omental flap in a one-stage operation. The patient was extubated the next day and transferred to the general ward on postoperative day 3. Computed tomography revealed favorable results. CONCLUSIONS: For postoperative AEF, dedicated debridement with reconstruction is more effective than conservative treatment. In an experienced center, post-procedure-related AEF can be easily treated using one-stage reconstruction.

Surgical bypass to the left subclavian artery: an extra-anatomical transpleural approach.

A distal anastomosis in zone 3 is technically demanding during the frozen elephant trunk procedure. Proximalization of the distal anastomosis to zone 2 with subsequent revascularization of the left subclavian artery is an attractive alternative. This video tutorial describes the technique of an extra-anatomical bypass from the aortic prosthesis to the infraclavicular left subclavian (axillary) artery in arch replacement with the distal aortic graft anastomosis in zone 2.

Lactate-Based Difference as a Determinant of Outcomes following Surgery for Type A Acute Aortic Dissection: A Multi-Centre Study.

Type A acute aortic dissection (TAAAD) is a serious condition within the acute aortic syndromes that demands immediate treatment. Despite advancements in diagnostic and referral pathways, the survival rate post-surgery currently sits at almost 20%. Our objective was to pinpoint clinical indicators for mortality and morbidity, particularly raised arterial lactate as a key factor for negative outcomes. METHODS: All patients referred to the three cardiovascular centres between January 2005 and December 2022 were included in the study. The inclusion criteria required the presence of a lesion involving the ascending aorta, symptoms within 7 days of surgery, and referral for primary surgical repair of TAAAD based on recommendations, with consideration for other concomitant major cardiac surgical procedures needed during TAAAD and retrograde extension of TAAAD. We conducted an analysis of both continuous and categorical variables and utilised predictive mean matching to fill in missing numeric features. For missing binary variables, we used logistic regression to impute values. We specifically targeted early postoperative mortality and employed LASSO regression to minimise potential collinearity of over-fitting variables and variables measured from the same patient. RESULTS: A total of 633 patients were recruited for the study, out of which 449 patients had complete preoperative arterial lactate data. The average age of the patients was 64 years, and 304 patients were male (67.6%). The crude early postoperative mortality rate was 24.5% (110 out of 449 patients). The mortality rate did not show any significant difference when comparing conservative and extensive surgeries. However, malperfusion had a significant impact on mortality [48/131 (36.6%) vs. 62/318 (19.5%), p < 0.001]. Preoperative arterial lactates were significantly elevated in patients with malperfusion. The optimal prognostic threshold of arterial lactate for predicting early postoperative mortality in our cohort was ≥2.6 mmol/L. CONCLUSION: The arterial lactate concentration in patients referred for TAAAD is an independent factor for both operative mortality and postoperative complications. In addition to mortality, patients with an upper arterial lactate cut-off of ≥2.6 mmol/L face significant risks of VA ECMO and the need for dialysis within the first 48 h after surgery. To improve recognition and facilitate rapid transfer and surgical treatment protocol, more diligent efforts are required in the management of malperfusion in TAAAD.

Total arch replacement for an aortic arch aneurysm with cold agglutinin disease after rituximab and plasmapheresis.

BACKGROUND: Cold agglutinin disease can lead to significant complications, especially for patients undergoing arch repair requiring hypothermic circulatory arrest. Rituximab and plasmapheresis are treatments for cold agglutinin disease. However, its use in patients with Stanford type A dissection has not been reported. Therefore, after consultation with hematologists, we used rituximab and plasmapheresis before mild hypothermic aortic arch surgery to maintain the body temperature above the thermal altitude. CASE PRESENTATION: This report describes an 86-year-old male patient with acute type A aortic dissection who received outpatient treatment for rheumatoid arthritis and a 55-mm thoracic aortic aneurysm. The patient was scheduled to undergo urgent surgery for a type A intramural hematoma and progressive aortic aneurysm; however, laboratory test results indicated blood clotting and cold agglutinin. Consequently, urgent surgery was rescheduled. After consulting with hematologists, rituximab was initiated 3 months before surgery, and plasmapheresis was performed 2 days before surgery for cold agglutinin disease. Under mild hypothermia conditions, total arch replacement using the frozen elephant trunk technique was performed while maintaining cerebral and lower body perfusion. The postoperative course was uneventful. On postoperative day 42, the patient was discharged without any neurological deficits. CONCLUSIONS: This case involving total arch replacement with mild hypothermia for an aortic arch aneurysm with cold agglutinin disease after rituximab treatment and plasmapheresis resulted in a successful outcome.