Orbital Metastasis as the First Manifestation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma, and Its Effective Treatment with Combined Dual Immunotherapy: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND Orbital metastasis originating from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), particularly as an initial manifestation in patients without a known history of HCC, is rare. Few reports exist on the treatment of patients having HCC with orbital metastasis using targeted therapy or immunotherapy. CASE REPORT We report a case of advanced-stage HCC in a 65-year-old man who first presented with progressive, painless blurred vision and proptosis of the right eye for 2 weeks. The patient had no history of chronic liver disease or cancer. Computed tomography revealed an enhancing hyperdense extraconal mass in the right orbit; a biopsy revealed metastatic HCC. Abdominal CT, which was performed to investigate the primary cancer, revealed a 1.2×1.6-cm arterial-enhancing nodule with venous washout in hepatic segment 5, associated with liver cirrhosis. The patient's serum alpha-fetoprotein level was 70.27 ng/dL. Chest computed tomography revealed lung metastasis. Thus, first-line systemic therapy combining durvalumab and tremelimumab was initiated alongside palliative radiotherapy targeting the right orbit, which began 1 week after the first dose of dual immunotherapy. The patient had significant clinical improvement, reduced proptosis, and serum alpha-fetoprotein levels. CONCLUSIONS Although orbital metastasis is a rare manifestation of HCC, physicians should recognize and consider aggressive investigations for early diagnosis, especially in patients with existing risk factors for HCC. Dual immunotherapy with durvalumab and tremelimumab in combination with radiotherapy can be considered a potential treatment option for managing advanced HCC with orbital metastasis.

A real-life study of daratumumab combinations in newly diagnosed patients with light chain (AL) amyloidosis.

Daratumumab-based regimens are the new standard of care for newly diagnosed patients with AL amyloidosis based on the results of the ANDROMEDA study. However, real-world data on daratumumab efficacy in upfront therapy in unselected patients are scanty. In the framework of a prospective observational study, we investigated the efficacy and safety of daratumumab in 88 newly diagnosed patients, including subjects with IIIb cardiac stage (26%) or myeloma defining events (29%). Daratumumab was administered with bortezomib in 50 (56%) patients, lenalidomide in 31 (35%), and monotherapy in 7 (8%). The rate of serious adverse events was low (16%). The overall hematologic response rate was 75% with 52 (59%) patients attaining at least a very good partial response (VGPR) at six months. Amongst patients evaluable for organ response, the rate of cardiac and renal responses at 6 months was 31% and 21%, respectively. Comparing stage IIIb patients with the remaining ones, the rate of profound hematologic response was not significantly different (≥VGPR 57% vs. 59%, p 0.955) likewise the rate of cardiac (33% vs. 30%, p 0.340) and renal (40% vs. 16%, p 0.908) responses. Daratumumab-based regimens demonstrated to be safe and effective in treatment-naïve AL amyloidosis even in advanced stage disease.

Basiliximab Treatment for Patients With Steroid-Refractory Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease Following Matched Sibling Donor Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Basiliximab is an important treatment for steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (SR-aGVHD). We performed this retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of basiliximab treatment in SR-aGVHD patients following matched sibling donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (MSD-HSCT) (n = 63). Overall response rate (ORR) was 63.5% and 54% at any time and at day 28 after basiliximab treatment. Grade III-IV aGVHD before basiliximab treatment predicted a poor ORR after basiliximab treatment. The rates of virus, bacteria, and fungi infections were 54%, 23.8%, and 3.1%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 730 (range, 67-3,042) days, the 1-year probability of overall survival and disease-free survival after basiliximab treatment were 58.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 47.6%-72.2%) and 55.4% (95% CI = 44.3%-69.2%), respectively. The 3-year cumulative incidence of relapse and non-relapse mortality after basiliximab treatment were 18.9% (95% CI = 8.3%-29.5%) and 33.8% (95% CI = 21.8%-45.7%), respectively. Comorbidities burden before allo-HSCT, severity of aGVHD and liver aGVHD before basiliximab treatment showed negative influences on survival. Thus, basiliximab was safe and effective treatment for SR-aGVHD following MSD-HSCT.

Preclinical characterization of a novel investigational monoclonal antibody CM313 with potent CD38-positive cell killing activity.

Introduction: CM313 is currently under clinical investigation for treatments of multiple myeloma, systemic lupus erythematosus, and immune thrombocytopenia. We aimed to report the preclinical profile of the novel therapeutic anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody (mAb) CM313, with an emphasis on the difference with other CD38-targeting mAb. Methods: The binding of CM313 to CD38 recombinant protein across species was assessed using ELISA. The binding of CM313 to CD38-positive (CD38+) cells was detected using flow cytometry assays. CM313-induced complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC), antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP) and apoptosis on different CD38+ cells were assessed by LDH release assays or flow cytometry assays. The effect of CM313 on CD38 enzymatic activity was measured using fluorescence spectroscopy. CM313 immunotoxicity in human blood was assessed using flow cytometry assays, ELISA, and LDH release assays. Anti-tumor activity of CM313 was assessed in multiple mouse xenograft models. Safety profile of CM313 were evaluated in cynomolgus monkeys and human CD38 transgenic (B-hCD38) mice. Results: There exist unique sequences at complementarity-determining regions (CDR) of CM313, which facilitates its affinity to CD38 is consistently higher across a spectrum of CD38+ cell lines than daratumumab. In vitro studies showed that CM313 induces comparable killing activity than daratumumab, including ADCC, CDC, ADCP, apoptosis induced by Fc-mediated cross-linking, and effectively inhibited the enzymatic activity of CD38. However, CM313 showed more potent CDC than isatuximab. In vivo, CM313 dose-dependently inhibited xenograft tumor growth, both as a monotherapy and in combination with dexamethasone or lenalidomide. Furthermore, CM313 was well tolerated with no drug-related clinical signs or off-target risks, as evidenced by 4-week repeat-dose toxicology studies in cynomolgus monkeys and B-hCD38 mice, with the later study showing no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) of 300mg/kg once weekly. Discussion: CM313 is a novel investigational humanized mAb with a distinct CDR sequence, showing comparable killing effects with daratumumab and stronger CDC activity than isatuximab, which supports its clinical development.

The role of the size of affinity ligands in the detection and characterization of extracellular vesicles.

Surface proteins on the membrane of nano-sized extracellular vesicles (EVs) not only play crucial roles in cell-to-cell communication, but also are specific binding targets for EV detection, isolation and tracking. The low abundance of protein biomarkers on EV surface, the formation of clusters and the complex EV surface network impose significant challenges to the study of EVs. Employing bulky sized affinity ligands, such as antibodies, in the detection and characterization of these vesicles often result in reduced sensitivity of detection or poor quantification of proteins on the EV surface. By virtue of their small size and high specificity, Affibody molecules emerge as a potential alternative to their monoclonal antibody counterparts as robust affinity ligands in EV research. In this study, we present a theoretical framework on the superiority of anti-HER2 Affibodies over anti-HER2 antibodies in labeling and detecting HER2-positive EVs, followed by the demonstration of the advantages of HER2 Affibodies in accessing EV surface and the detection of EVs through multiple types of approaches including fluorescence intensity, colorimetry, and fluorescence polarization. HER2 Affibodies outperformed by 10-fold over three HER2 antibody clones in accessing HER2-positive EVs derived from different human cancer cell lines. Furthermore, HRP-Affibody molecules could detect EVs from cancer cells spiked into human serum with at least a 2-fold higher sensitivity compared with that of their antibody counterparts. In addition, in fluorescence polarization assays in which no separation of free from bound ligand is required, FITC-labeled HER2 Affibodies could sensitively detect HER2-positive EVs with a clinically relevant limit of detection, whilst HER2 antibodies failed to detect EVs in the same conditions. With the demonstrated superiority in accessing and detecting surface targets over bulky-sized antibodies in EVs, Affibodies may become the next-generation of affinity ligands in the precise characterization and quantification of molecular architecture on the surface of EVs.

[Advances of monoclonal antibodies and analysis of marketed antibody drugs].

In recent years, there has been a frequent occurrence of various epidemics worldwide such as COVID-19, monkeypox, influenza, and others additionally, there has been an increase in the number of new patients diagnosed with various types of tumors. Traditional drugs have limited effectiveness against emerging infectious diseases, tumors, and autoimmune diseases. However, with the emergence of hybridoma technology, monoclonal antibodies have achieved extensive applications and antibody drugs are playing an important role in modern medicine. Monoclonal antibodies have undergone various development stages, starting from mouse-derived antibodies to human-mouse chimeric antibodies, humanized antibodies, and ultimately human antibodies. Throughout this process, their immunogenicity has gradually decreased, while their safety for human use steadily increased. Fully human antibodies are currently the safest form of antibody, because their sequences all come from human sources and they do not induce human anti-murine antibody reactions. With the advance of genetic engineering technology, flow cytometry coupled to single B cell gene amplification technology has made it easier to construct and screen for fully human monoclonal antibodies. The development of antibody drugs has provided new opportunities, and the market for monoclonal antibody drugs will further expand. This article reviews the research progress of monoclonal antibodies and presents information on the 163 monoclonal antibody drugs approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as of Oct 1st, 2023. The aim is to offer new insights for the development and production of monoclonal antibodies in China.

[Prokaryotic expression of N protein of akabane disease virus and preparation of monoclonal antibody].

In order to generate monoclonal antibodies against the akabane virus (AKAV) N protein, this study employed a prokaryotic expression system to express the AKAV N protein. Following purification, BALB/c mice were immunized, and their splenocytes were fused with mouse myeloma cells (SP2/0) to produce hybridoma cells. The indirect ELISA method was used to screen for positive hybridoma cells. Two specific hybridoma cell lines targeting AKAV N protein, designated as 2C9 and 5E9, were isolated after three rounds of subcloning. Further characterization was conducted through ELISA, Western blotting, and indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA). The results confirmed that the monoclonal antibodies specifically target AKAV N protein, exhibiting strong reactivity in IFA. Subtype analysis identified the heavy chain of the 2C9 mAb's as IgG2b and its light chain as κ-type; the 5E9 mAb's heavy chain was determined to be IgG1, with a κ-type light chain. Their ELISA titers reached 1:4 096 000. This study successfully developed two monoclonal antibodies targeting AKAV N protein, which lays a crucial foundation for advancing diagnostic methods for akabane disease prevention and control, as well as for studying the function of the AKAV N protein.

Ultrastructural localization of calcium homeostasis modulator 1 in mouse taste buds.

Taste receptor cells are morphologically classified as types II and III. Type II cells form a unique type of synapses referred to as channel synapses where calcium homeostasis modulator 1 (CALHM1) together with CALHM3 forms voltage-gated channels that release the neurotransmitter, adenosine triphosphate (ATP). To validate the proposed structural model of channel synapses, the ultrastructural localization of CALHM1 in type II cells of both fungiform and circumvallate taste buds was examined. A monoclonal antibody against CALHM1 was developed and its localization was evaluated via immunofluorescence and immunoelectron microscopy using the immunogold-silver labeling technique. CALHM1 was detected as puncta using immunofluorescence and along the presynaptic membrane of channel synapses facing atypical mitochondria, which provide ATP, by immunoelectron microscopy. In addition, it was detected along the plasma membrane lined by subsurface cisternae at sites apposed to afferent nerve fibers. Our results support the validity of a previously proposed structural model for channel synapses and provide insights into the function of subsurface cisternae whose function in taste receptor cells is unknown. We also examined the localization of CALHM1 in hybrid synapses of type III cells, which are conventional chemical synapses accompanied by mitochondria similar to atypical mitochondria of channel synapses. CALHM1 was not detected in the six hybrid synapses examined using immunoelectron microscopy. We further performed double immunolabeling for CALHM1 and Bassoon, which is detected as puncta corresponding to conventional vesicular synapses in type III cells. Our observations suggest that at least some, and probably most, hybrid synapses are not accompanied by CALHM1.

Application of CD38 monoclonal antibody in kidney disease.

CD38 antigen is a glycoprotein that found on the surface of several immune cells, and this property makes its monoclonal antibodies have the effect of targeted elimination of immune cells. Therefore, the CD38 monoclonal antibody (such as daratumumab, Isatuximab) becomes a new treatment option for membranous nephropathy, lupus nephritis, renal transplantation, and other refractory kidney diseases. This review summarizes the application of CD38 monoclonal antibodies in different kidney diseases and highlights future prospects.

Molecular classification and biomarkers of outcome with immunotherapy in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: analyses of the CASPIAN phase 3 study.

BACKGROUND: We explored potential predictive biomarkers of immunotherapy response in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) treated with durvalumab (D) + tremelimumab (T) + etoposide-platinum (EP), D + EP, or EP in the randomized phase 3 CASPIAN trial. METHODS: 805 treatment-naïve patients with ES-SCLC were randomized (1:1:1) to receive D + T + EP, D + EP, or EP. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Patients were required to provide an archived tumor tissue block (or ≥ 15 newly cut unstained slides) at screening, if these samples existed. After assessment for programmed cell death ligand-1 expression and tissue tumor mutational burden, residual tissue was used for additional molecular profiling including by RNA sequencing and immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: In 182 patients with transcriptional molecular subtyping, OS with D ± T + EP was numerically highest in the SCLC-inflamed subtype (n = 10, median 24.0 months). Patients derived benefit from immunotherapy across subtypes; thus, additional biomarkers were investigated. OS benefit with D ± T + EP versus EP was greater with high versus low CD8A expression/CD8 cell density by immunohistochemistry, but with no additional benefit with D + T + EP versus D + EP. OS benefit with D + T + EP versus D + EP was associated with high expression of CD4 (median 25.9 vs. 11.4 months) and antigen-presenting and processing machinery (25.9 vs. 14.6 months) and MHC I and II (23.6 vs. 17.3 months) gene signatures, and with higher MHC I expression by immunohistochemistry. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate the tumor microenvironment is important in mediating better outcomes with D ± T + EP in ES-SCLC, with canonical immune markers associated with hypothesized immunotherapy mechanisms of action defining patient subsets that respond to D ± T. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03043872.

Daratumumab and antineoplastic therapy versus antineoplastic therapy only for adults with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma ineligible for transplant.

BACKGROUND: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a haematological malignancy that is characterised by proliferation of malignant plasma cells in the bone marrow. For adults ineligible to receive high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant, the recommended treatment combinations in first-line therapy generally consist of combinations of alkylating agents, immunomodulatory drugs, and proteasome inhibitors. Daratumumab is a CD38-targeting, human IgG1k monoclonal antibody recently developed and approved for the treatment of people diagnosed with MM. Multiple myeloma cells uniformly over-express CD-38, a 46-kDa type II transmembrane glycoprotein, making myeloma cells a specific target for daratumumab. OBJECTIVES: To determine the benefits and harms of daratumumab in addition to antineoplastic therapy compared to antineoplastic therapy only for adults with newly diagnosed MM who are ineligible for transplant. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, EU Clinical Trials Register, ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO ICTRP, and conference proceedings from 2010 to September 2023. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials that compared treatment with daratumumab added to antineoplastic therapy versus the same antineoplastic therapy alone in adult participants with a confirmed diagnosis of MM. We excluded quasi-randomised trials and trials with less than 80% adult participants, unless there were subgroup analyses of adults with MM. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently screened the results of the search strategies for eligibility. We documented the process of study selection in a flowchart as recommended by the PRISMA statement. We evaluated the risk of bias in included studies with RoB 1 and assessed the certainty of the evidence using GRADE. We followed standard Cochrane methodological procedures. MAIN RESULTS: We included four open-label, two-armed randomised controlled trials (34 publications) involving a total of 1783 participants. The ALCYONE, MAIA, and OCTANS trials were multicentre trials conducted worldwide in middle- and high-income countries. The AMaRC 03-16 trial was conducted in one high-income country, Australia. The mean age of participants was 69 to 74 years, and the proportion of female participants was between 40% and 54%. All trials evaluated antineoplastic therapies with or without daratumumab. In the ALCYONE and OCTANS trials, daratumumab was combined with bortezomib and melphalan-prednisone. In the AMaRC 03-16 study, it was combined with bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone, and in the MAIA study, it was combined with lenalidomide and dexamethasone. None of the included studies was blinded (high risk of performance and detection bias). One study was published as abstract only, therefore the risk of bias for most criteria was unclear. The other three studies were published as full texts. Apart from blinding, the risk of bias was low for these studies. Overall survival Treatment with daratumumab probably increases overall survival when compared to the same treatment without daratumumab (hazard ratio (HR) 0.64, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53 to 0.76, 2 studies, 1443 participants, moderate-certainty evidence). After a follow-up period of 36 months, 695 per 1000 participants survived in the control group, whereas 792 per 1000 participants survived in the daratumumab group (95% CI 758 to 825). Progression-free survival Treatment with daratumumab probably increases progression-free survival when compared to treatment without daratumumab (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.58, 3 studies, 1663 participants, moderate-certainty evidence). After a follow-up period of 24 months, progression-free survival was reached in 494 per 1000 participants in the control group versus 713 per 1000 participants in the daratumumab group (95% CI 664 to 760). Quality of life Treatment with daratumumab may result in a very small increase in quality of life after 12 months, evaluated on the EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status scale (GHS), when compared to treatment without daratumumab (mean difference 2.19, 95% CI -0.13 to 4.51, 3 studies, 1096 participants, low-certainty evidence). The scale is from 0 to 100, with a higher value indicating a better quality of life. On-study mortality Treatment with daratumumab probably decreases on-study mortality when compared to treatment without daratumumab (risk ratio (RR) 0.72, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.83, 3 studies, 1644 participants, moderate-certainty evidence). After the longest follow-up available (12 to 72 months), 366 per 1000 participants in the control group and 264 per 1000 participants in the daratumumab group died (95% CI 227 to 304). Serious adverse events Treatment with daratumumab probably increases serious adverse events when compared to treatment without daratumumab (RR 1.18, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.37, 3 studies, 1644 participants, moderate-certainty evidence). After the longest follow-up available (12 to 72 months), 505 per 1000 participants in the control group versus 596 per 1000 participants in the daratumumab group experienced serious adverse events (95% CI 515 to 692). Adverse events (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade ≥ 3) Treatment with daratumumab probably results in little to no difference in adverse events (CTCAE grade ≥ 3) when compared to treatment without daratumumab (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.02, 3 studies, 1644 participants, moderate-certainty evidence). After the longest follow-up available (12 to 72 months), 953 per 1000 participants in the control group versus 963 per 1000 participants in the daratumumab group experienced adverse events (CTCAE grade ≥ 3) (95% CI 943 to 972). Treatment with daratumumab probably increases the risk of infections (CTCAE grade ≥ 3) when compared to treatment without daratumumab (RR 1.52, 95% CI 1.30 to 1.78, 3 studies, 1644 participants, moderate-certainty evidence). After the longest follow-up available (12 to 72 months), 224 per 1000 participants in the control group versus 340 per 1000 participants in the daratumumab group experienced infections (CTCAE grade ≥ 3) (95% CI 291 to 399). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Overall analysis of four studies showed a potential benefit for daratumumab in terms of overall survival and progression-free survival and a slight potential benefit in quality of life. Participants treated with daratumumab probably experience increased serious adverse events. There were likely no differences between groups in adverse events (CTCAE grade ≥ 3); however, there are probably more infections (CTCAE grade ≥ 3) in participants treated with daratumumab. We identified six ongoing studies which might strengthen the certainty of evidence in a future update of this review.

Durvalumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced biliary tract cancer (TOPAZ-1): patient-reported outcomes from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: In the ongoing, randomised, double-blind phase 3 TOPAZ-1 study, durvalumab, a PD-L1 inhibitor, plus gemcitabine and cisplatin was associated with significant improvements in overall survival compared with placebo, gemcitabine, and cisplatin in people with advanced biliary tract cancer at the pre-planned intermin analysis. In this paper, we present patient-reported outcomes from TOPAZ-1. METHODS: In TOPAZ-1 (NCT03875235), participants aged 18 years or older with previously untreated, unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic biliary tract cancer with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 and one or more measurable lesions per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST; version 1.1) were randomly assigned (1:1) to the durvalumab group or the placebo group using a computer-generated randomisation scheme. Participants received 1500 mg durvalumab or matched placebo intravenously every 3 weeks (on day 1 of the cycle) for up to eight cycles in combination with 1000 mg/m2 gemcitabine and 25 mg/m2 cisplatin intravenously on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks for up to eight cycles. Thereafter, participants received either durvalumab (1500 mg) or placebo monotherapy intravenously every 4 weeks until disease progression or other discontinuation criteria were met. Randomisation was stratified by disease status (initially unresectable vs recurrent) and primary tumour location (intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma vs extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma vs gallbladder cancer). Patient-reported outcomes were assessed as a secondary outcome in all participants who completed the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer's 30-item Quality of Life of Cancer Patients questionnaire (QLQ-C30) and the 21-item Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Quality of Life Module (QLQ-BIL21). We calculated time to deterioration-ie, time from randomisation to an absolute decrease of at least 10 points in a patient-reported outcome that was confirmed at a subsequent visit or the date of death (by any cause) in the absence of deterioration-and adjusted mean change from baseline in patient-reported outcomes. FINDINGS: Between April 16, 2019, and Dec 11, 2020, 685 participants were enrolled and randomly assigned, 341 to the durvalumab group and 344 to the placebo group. Overall, 345 (50%) of participants were male and 340 (50%) were female. Data for the QLQ-C30 were available for 318 participants in the durvalumab group and 328 in the placebo group (median follow-up 9·9 months [IQR 6·7 to 14·1]). Data for the QLQ-BIL21 were available for 305 participants in the durvalumab group and 322 in the placebo group (median follow-up 10·2 months [IQR 6·7 to 14·3]). The proportions of participants in both groups who completed questionnaires were high and baseline scores were mostly similar across treatment groups. For global health status or quality of life, functioning, and symptoms, we noted no difference in time to deterioration or adjusted mean changes from baseline were observed between groups. Median time to deterioration of global health status or quality of life was 7·4 months (95% CI 5·6 to 8·9) in the durvalumab group and 6·7 months (5·6 to 7·9) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·87 [95% CI 0·69 to 1·12]). The adjusted mean change from baseline was 1·23 (95% CI -0·71 to 3·16) in the durvalumab group and 0·35 (-1·63 to 2·32) in the placebo group. INTERPRETATION: The addition of durvalumab to gemcitabine and cisplatin did not have a detrimental effect on patient-reported outcomes. These results suggest that durvalumab, gemcitabine, and cisplatin is a tolerable treatment regimen in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer. FUNDING: AstraZeneca.

The role of chemoradiotherapy and immunotherapy in stage III NSCLC.

Locally advanced non-small lung cancer encompasses a diverse range of tumors. In the last few years, the treatment of stage III unresectable non-small lung cancer has evolved significantly. The PACIFIC trial opened a new therapeutic era in the treatment of locally advanced NSCLC, establishing durvalumab consolidation therapy as the new standard of care worldwide. A careful evaluation of this type of lung cancer and a discussion of the management of these patients within a multidisciplinary team represents a crucial step in defining the best treatment strategy for each patient. For unresectable stage III NSCLC, definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) was historically recommended as a treatment with a 5-year survival rate ranging from 20% to 30%. The PACIFIC study conducted in 2017 compared the use of chemoradiotherapy and maintenance therapy with the anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody durvalumab to a placebo in patients with locally advanced NSCLC who had not experienced disease progression. The study was prospective, randomized, and phase III. The administration of this medication in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has demonstrated a notable improvement in overall survival. Multiple clinical trials are currently exploring various immune checkpoint inhibition regimens to enhance the treatment efficacy in patients with stage III cancer. Our goal is to offer an up-to-date summary of the planned clinical trials for treatment options, focusing on the significant obstacles and prospects in the post-PACIFIC era.

[Preparation and assessment of a monoclonal antibody against mouse NLRP3].

Objective To prepare a monoclonal antibody (mAb) against mouse NOD-like receptor family pyrin domain-containing 3 (NLRP3) and assess its specificity. Methods A gene fragment encoding mouse NLRP3 exon3 (Ms-N3) was inserted into the vector p36-G3-throhFc to construct a recombinant plasmid named Ms-N3-throhFc. This plasmid was then transfected into HEK293F cells for eukaryotic expression. NLRP3-/- mice were immunized with Ms-N3 protein purified using a protein A chromatography column, and splenocytes from the immunized mice were fused with SP2/0 myeloma cells to generate hybridoma cells. Specific mAbs against murine NLRP3 from hybridoma cells were screened using ELISA and immunofluorescence assay(IFA). Results The Ms-N3-throhFc recombinant plasmid was successfully constructed and exhibited stable expression in HEK293F cells. Twelve hybridoma cell lines were initially screened using ELISA. IFA revealed that the mAb secreted by the 9-B8-3-2-C5 cell line specifically recognized the native form of mouse NLRP3 protein. The heavy and light chain subtypes of this mAb were identified as IgM and κ, respectively. Conclusion A monoclonal antibody against mouse NLRP3 has been successfully prepared.

Antibody Isolation in C. neoformans.

The importance of humoral immunity to fungal infections remains to be elucidated. In cryptococcosis, patients that fail to generate antibodies against antigens of the fungus Cryptococcus neoformans are more susceptible to the disease, demonstrating the importance of these molecules to the antifungal immune response. Historically, antibodies against C. neoformans have been applied in diagnosis, therapeutics, and as important research tools to elucidate fungal biology. Throughout the process of generating monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) from a single B-cell clone and targeting a single epitope, several immunization steps might be required for the detection of responsive antibodies to the antigen of interest in the serum. This complex mixture of antibodies comprises the polyclonal antibodies. To obtain mAbs, B-lymphocytes are harvested (from spleen or peripheral blood) and fused with tumor myeloma cells, to generate hybridomas that are individually cloned and specifically screened for mAb production. In this chapter, we describe all the necessary steps, from the immunization to polyclonal antibody harvesting, hybridoma generation, and mAb production and purification. Additionally, we discuss new cutting-edge approaches for generating interspecies mAbs, such as humanized mAbs, or for similar species in distinct host backgrounds.

Structural Characterization of Monoclonal Antibodies and Epitope Mapping by FFAP Footprinting.

Covalent labeling in combination with mass spectrometry is a powerful approach used in structural biology to study protein structures, interactions, and dynamics. Recently, the toolbox of covalent labeling techniques has been expanded with fast fluoroalkylation of proteins (FFAP). FFAP is a novel radical labeling method that utilizes fluoroalkyl radicals generated from hypervalent Togni reagents for targeting aromatic residues. This report further demonstrates the benefits of FFAP as a new method for structural characterization of therapeutic antibodies and interaction interfaces of antigen-antibody complexes. The results obtained from human trastuzumab and its complex with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) correlate well with previously published structural data and demonstrate the potential of FFAP in structural biology.

Biologics for Psoriasis.

Biologic therapies targeting tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) (infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab, etanercept), the p40 subunit shared by IL-12 and IL-23 (ustekinumab), the p19 subunit of IL-23 (guselkumab, tildrakizumab, risankizumab), IL-17A (secukinumab, ixekizumab), IL-17-RA (brodalumab) and both IL-17A and IL-17F (bimekizumab) have revolutionized the treatment of psoriasis. In both the short and long term, risankizumab had highest Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90 scores compared to other oral and injectable biologics. IL-23 inhibitors had lowest rates of short-term and long-term adverse events and most favorable long-term risk-benefit profile compared to IL-17, IL-12/23, and TNF-α inhibitors.

Case report: Inflammatory sternoclavicular joint arthritis induced by an immune checkpoint inhibitor with remarkable responsiveness to infliximab.

This report describes the case of a 48-year-old woman who presented with sternoclavicular joint arthritis after administration of an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), durvalumab, for small cell lung carcinoma. The onset of arthritis transpired 18 months after the commencement of the ICI therapeutic regimen and demonstrated resilience to glucocorticoid treatment. After excluding infectious aetiologies and metastatic involvement, the patient was diagnosed with ICI-induced arthritis (ICI-IA). Considering the articular implications akin to the SAPHO syndrome, the patient was treated with infliximab, resulting in complete resolution. This finding implies that biological DMARDs can serve as effective interventions for ICI-induced sternoclavicular joint arthritis. Given the heterogeneous nature of its pathogenesis, the selection of therapeutic agents may require customization based on the distinct clinical presentation of each individual case.

Efficacy and safety of lenvatinib plus durvalumab combined with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Background: The prognosis for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is poor and the efficacy of traditional chemotherapy remains unsatisfactory. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) with oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil (FOLFOX) is effective in patients with unresectable ICC. In this study, we determined the preliminary clinical efficacy and safety of lenvatinib plus durvalumab combined with FOLFOX-HAIC in patients with untreated, unresectable ICC. Materials and methods: Between July 2021 and July 2023, patients with unresectable ICC who initially received lenvatinib plus durvalumab combined with FOLFOX-HAIC at the Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center (SYSUCC) were reviewed for eligibility. Efficacy was evaluated by tumor response rate and survival, and safety was assessed by the frequency of key adverse events (AEs). Results: A total of 28 eligible patients were enrolled. The objective response rates (ORRs) based on mRECIST and RECIST 1.1 criteria were 65.2% and 39.1%, respectively. The median OS was 17.9 months (95% CI, 5.7-30.1) and the median PFS was 11.9 months (95% CI, 6.7-17.1). Most patients (92.9%) experienced adverse events (AEs), whereas 46.5% (13/28) experienced grade 3 or 4 AEs. Conclusion: Lenvatinib plus durvalumab combined with FOLFOX-HAIC showed promising antitumor activity and manageable AEs in patients with treatment-naive unresectable ICC. This regimen may be suitable as a novel first-line treatment option for this patient population.