Libtayo® (Cemiplimab-rwlc) Injection for Intravenous Use.

Libtayo® (cemiplimab-rwlc) injection for intravenous use was recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for locally advanced basal cell carcinoma (laBCC) and metastatic basal cell carcinoma (mBCC), both being the advanced stages of BCC. In the past, it was approved by the FDA for the treatment of metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (mCSCC) and locally advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (laCSCC), both being the advanced stages of CSCC. Cemiplimab is a monoclonal antibody that works by blocking the programmed death-1 pathway. In two open-label, single-arm, phase 2 studies, cemiplimab was investigated for the treatment of advanced stages of BCC (study 1620, NCT03132636) and advanced stages of CSCC (study 1540, NCT02760498). The primary endpoint was objec-tive response rate (ORR) per independent central review. In the study 1620, both mBCC and laBCC received cemiplimab 350 mg every 3 weeks. ORR was 21% (6/28) and 31% (26/84) in the mBCC and laBCC groups, respectively. In the study 1520, mCSCC was divided into two groups: one receiving cemiplimab 350 mg every 3 weeks (Q3W) and another receiving 3-mg/kg cemiplimab every 2 weeks (Q2W); the third group, laCSCC, received cemiplimab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks. ORR was 41% (23/56) in the Q3W group, 49% (29/59) in the Q2W group, and 44% (34/78) in the laCSCC group. An acceptable safety profile and antitumor activity was discovered in patients treated with cemiplimab. The recommended dosage for cemiplimab to treat advanced stages of BCC and CSCC is 350 mg every 3 weeks administered intravenously over 30 min.

Classification and Regression Trees to Predict for Survival for Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated With Atezolizumab and Bevacizumab.

PURPOSE: Systemic therapy with atezolizumab and bevacizumab can extend life for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, there is substantial variability in response to therapy and overall survival. Although current prognostic models have been validated in HCC, they primarily consider covariates that may be reflective of the severity of the underlying liver disease of patients with HCC. We developed and internally validated a classification and regression tree (CART) to identify patient characteristics associated with risks of early mortality, at or before 6 months from treatment initiation. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used the nationwide Flatiron Health electronic health record-derived deidentified database and included patients with a diagnosis of HCC after January 1, 2020, who received initial systemic therapy with atezolizumab and bevacizumab. CART was developed from available baseline clinical and demographic information to predict mortality within 6 months from treatment initiation. Model characteristics were compared to the albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) model and was further validated against a contemporary validation cohort of patients after a data update. RESULTS: A total of 293 patients were analyzed. The CART identified seven cohorts of patients from baseline demographic and laboratory characteristics. The model had an area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) of 0.739 (95% CI, 0.683 to 0.794) for predicting 6-month mortality. This model was internally valid and performed more favorably than the ALBI model, which had an AUROC of 0.608 (95% CI, 0.557 to 0.660). The model applied to the contemporary validation cohort (n = 111) had an AUROC of 0.666 (95% CI, 0.506 to 0.826). CONCLUSION: Using CART, we identified unique cohorts of patients with HCC treated with atezolizumab and bevacizumab with distinct risks of early mortality. This approach outperformed the ALBI model and used clinical and laboratory characteristics that are readily available to oncologists caring for these patients.

[Importance of Measuring the Urine Protein/Creatinine Ratio in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Receiving Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab Treatment].

INTRODUCTION: When we administer atezolizumab plus bevacizumab treatment to patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, we often encounter inconsistent results between the qualitative dipstick urinalysis and the urine protein/creatinine ratio(UPCR)measurements. In this study, we investigated the relationship between qualitative dipstick urinalysis and UPCR in these patients, and assessed whether incorporating UPCR into the testing protocol could prevent unnecessary interruptions during bevacizumab treatment. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This study analyzed 298 urine samples collected from 61 patients of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, who were treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab at our institution between October 1, 2020, and August 31, 2021. We used UPCR as an alternative test to the 24-hour urine protein and set the discontinuation criteria for bevacizumab at a UPCR of 2.0 or higher. RESULTS: Among the 41 samples that tested positive for 2+ on the dipstick test, only one(2.4%)had a UPCR exceeding 2.0. Additionally, among the 44 samples that showed a 3+ result, 24 samples(54.5%)had a UPCR higher than 2.0. If our decision to discontinue bevacizumab had been based on a dipstick urinalysis result of 2+, we could have continued administering bevacizumab in 97.6%(40/41)of the cases. Even if the decision had been based on a dipstick urinalysis result of 3+, we could have continued administering bevacizumab in almost half of the cases(45.5%, 20/44). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the addition of UPCR to the qualitative dipstick urinalysis during atezolizumab plus bevacizumab treatment for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma could help prevent unnecessary interruptions of bevacizumab and offer more clinical benefits in real-world practice, compared to using qualitative dipstick urinalysis alone.

Efficacy of nimotuzumab in combination with immunotherapy for a young recurrent cervical cancer patient: a case report and literature review.

Cervical cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors in women, and more than one-third of the patients have already developed to a locally advanced stage at initial diagnosis. After standard concurrent chemoradiotherapy, recurrence still occurs in 29-38% of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC), and the 5-year survival rate of patients with recurrence is only 3.8-13.0%, resulting in a poor prognosis and limited therapeutic choices. Currently, the recommended first-line systemic treatment for recurrent metastatic cervical cancer involves cisplatin or carboplatin in combination with paclitaxel-based chemotherapy, supplemented with the antivascular agent bevacizumab and the immune checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab. The use of these drugs, however, is limited due to side effects such as myelosuppression, gastrointestinal perforation, and bleeding, so new treatment modalities need to be explored. Anti-EGFR (epithelial growth factor receptor, anti-surface growth factor receptor antibody) targeted drugs have been demonstrated to have a significant radiosensitizing effect on synchronous chemoradiotherapy in LACC and are now considered to have potential for the treatment of recurrent cervical cancer. We represented a LACC patient who relapsed 6 months after concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The patient received six cycles of nimotuzumab combined with camrelizumab, and the efficacy was evaluated to be partial remission after two or four cycles of treatment, with progression-free survival up to 9 months, without significant side effects. Until March 2024, the patient was still undergoing treatment. Promising efficacy and tolerable side effects of nimotuzumab in combination with camrelizumab were observed in this case.

A randomized phase II clinical trial of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and systemic pembrolizumab with or without intratumoral avelumab/ipilimumab plus CD1c (BDCA-1)+/CD141 (BDCA-3)+ myeloid dendritic cells in solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy (RT) synergizes with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). CD1c(BDCA-1)+/CD141(BDCA-3)+ myeloid dendritic cells (myDC) in the tumor microenvironment are indispensable at initiating effector T-cell responses and response to ICB. METHODS: In this phase II clinical trial, anti-PD-1 ICB pretreated oligometastatic patients (tumor agnostic) underwent a leukapheresis followed by isolation of CD1c(BDCA-1)+/CD141(BDCA-3)+ myDC. Following hypofractionated stereotactic body RT (3 × 8 Gy), patients were randomized (3:1). Respectively, in arm A (immediate treatment), intratumoral (IT) ipilimumab (10 mg) and avelumab (40 mg) combined with intravenous (IV) pembrolizumab (200 mg) were administered followed by IT injection of myDC; subsequently, IV pembrolizumab and IT ipilimumab/avelumab were continued (q3W). In arm B (contemporary control arm), patients received IV pembrolizumab, with possibility to cross-over at progression. Primary endpoint was 1-year progression-free survival rate (PFS). Secondary endpoints were safety, feasibility, objective response rate, PFS, and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Thirteen patients (10 in arm A, eight non-small cell lung cancer, and five melanoma) were enrolled. Two patients crossed over. One-year PFS rate was 10% in arm A and 0% in arm B. Two patients in arm A obtained a partial response, and one patient obtained a stable disease as best response. In arm B, one patient obtained a SD. Median PFS and OS were 21.8 weeks (arm A) versus 24.9 (arm B), and 62.7 versus 57.9 weeks, respectively. An iatrogenic pneumothorax was the only grade 3 treatment-related adverse event. CONCLUSION: SBRT and pembrolizumab with or without IT avelumab/ipilimumab and IT myDC in oligometastatic patients are safe and feasible with a clinically meaningful tumor response rate. However, the study failed to reach its primary endpoint. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04571632 (09 AUG 2020). EUDRACT: 2019-003668-32. Date of registration: 17 DEC 2019, amendment 1: 6 MAR 2021, amendment 2: 4 FEB 2022.

Neoadjuvant therapy of sequential TACE, camrelizumab, and apatinib for single huge hepatocellular carcinoma (NEO-START): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The high recurrence rate after liver resection emphasizes the urgent need for neoadjuvant therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to enhance the overall prognosis for patients. Immune checkpoint inhibitors, camrelizumab combined with an anti-angiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) apatinib, have emerged as a first-line treatment option for patients with unresectable HCC, yet its neoadjuvant application in combination with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in HCC remains unexplored. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of sequential TACE, camrelizumab, and apatinib as a neoadjuvant therapy for single, huge HCC. METHODS: This multi-center, open-label randomized phase 3 trial will be conducted at 7 tertiary hospitals. Patients with single huge (≥ 10 cm in diameter), resectable HCC will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to arm of surgery alone or arm of neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery. In the neoadjuvant therapy group, patients will receive TACE within 1 week after randomization, followed by camrelizumab (200 mg q2w, 4 cycles), along with apatinib (250 mg qd, 2 months). Patients will receive liver resection after neoadjuvant therapy unless the disease is assessed as progressive. The primary outcome is recurrence-free survival (RFS) at 1 year. The planned sample size of 60 patients will be calculated to permit the accumulation of sufficient RFS events in 1 year to achieve 80% power for the RFS primary endpoint. DISCUSSION: Synergistic effects provided by multimodality therapy of locoregional treatment, TKI, and anti-programmed cell death 1 inhibitor significantly improved overall survival for patients with unresectable HCC. Our trial will investigate the efficacy and safety of the triple combination of TACE, camrelizumab, and apatinib as a neoadjuvant strategy for huge, resectable HCC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.chitr.org.cn ChiCTR2300078086. Registered on November 28, 2023. Start recruitment: 1st January 2024. Expected completion of recruitment: 15th June 2025.

A randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial of pembrolizumab plus epacadostat versus sunitinib or pazopanib as first-line treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (KEYNOTE-679/ECHO-302).

BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy-based combinations have emerged as standard therapies for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Pembrolizumab, a PD-1 inhibitor, combined with epacadostat, an indoleamine 2,3-deoxygenase 1 selective inhibitor, demonstrated promising antitumor activity in a phase 1 study in advanced solid tumors, including mRCC. METHODS: KEYNOTE-679/ECHO-302 was a randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicenter, phase 3 study (NCT03260894) that compared pembrolizumab plus epacadostat with sunitinib or pazopanib as first-line treatment for mRCC. Eligible patients had histologically confirmed locally advanced or metastatic clear cell RCC and had not received systemic therapy. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to pembrolizumab 200 mg IV every 3 weeks plus epacadostat 100 mg orally twice daily versus sunitinib 50 mg orally once daily (4 weeks on treatment followed by 2 weeks off treatment) or pazopanib 800 mg orally once daily. Original dual primary end points were progression-free survival and overall survival. Enrollment was stopped when a phase 3 study in melanoma of pembrolizumab plus epacadostat compared with pembrolizumab monotherapy did not meet its primary end point. This protocol was amended, and primary end point was changed to investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1. RESULTS: One-hundred-twenty-nine patients were randomly assigned to receive pembrolizumab plus epacadostat (n = 64) or sunitinib/pazopanib (n = 65). Median (range) follow-up, defined as time from randomization to data cutoff, was 10.3 months (2.2-14.3) and 10.3 months (2.7-13.8) in the pembrolizumab plus epacadostat and sunitinib/pazopanib arms, respectively. ORRs were similar between pembrolizumab plus epacadostat (31.3% [95% CI 20.2-44.1] and sunitinib/pazopanib (29.2% [18.6-41.8]). Grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 34.4% and 42.9% of patients in the pembrolizumab plus epacadostat and sunitinib/pazopanib arms, respectively. One patient in the sunitinib/pazopanib arm died of septic shock (not treatment-related). Circulating kynurenine levels decreased in the pembrolizumab plus epacadostat arm, but not to levels observed in healthy subjects. CONCLUSIONS: ORRs were similar between pembrolizumab plus epacadostat and sunitinib/pazopanib as first-line treatment in patients with mRCC. Safety and tolerability appeared similar between treatment arms; no new safety concerns were identified. Antitumor responses observed in patients with RCC receiving pembrolizumab plus epacadostat may be driven primarily by pembrolizumab. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT03260894 .

Pembrolizumab with platinum-based chemotherapy with or without epacadostat as first-line treatment for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: a randomized, partially double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II study.

BACKGROUND: The combination of the checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) pembrolizumab and platinum-based chemotherapy is effective frontline therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) lacking targetable mutations. Indoleamine 2,3- dioxygenase 1 (IDO1), an enzyme involved in kynurenine production, inhibits immune responses. Inhibition of IDO1 may restore antitumor immunity and augment CPI activity. This trial evaluated addition of epacadostat, a potent and highly selective IDO1 inhibitor, to pembrolizumab and chemotherapy for metastatic NSCLC. METHODS: ECHO-306/KEYNOTE-715 was a partial double-blind, randomized phase II study of adults with treatment-naïve stage IV NSCLC not indicated for EGFR-, ALK-, or ROS1-directed therapy. Patients were randomized to one of three treatment arms: epacadostat-pembrolizumab-chemotherapy (E + P + C; blinded), epacadostat-pembrolizumab (E + P; open-label) or placebo-pembrolizumab-chemotherapy (PBO + P + C; blinded). Stratification was by PD-L1 tumor proportion score (< 50% vs. ≥ 50%) and tumor histology (non-squamous vs. squamous). A protocol amendment closed enrollment in the open-label E + P group, excluding it from efficacy analyses. Intravenous pembrolizumab (200 mg) was administered every 21 days and epacadostat 100 mg or matching placebo (oral) twice daily (BID) for ≤ 35 3-week cycles. The primary objective was objective response rate (ORR) for E + P + C vs. PBO + P + C. RESULTS: 178 patients were randomized to E + P + C (n = 91) or PBO + P + C (n = 87); 55 were enrolled in the E + P group. The E + P + C group had a lower confirmed ORR (26.4%; 95% CI 17.7-36.7) than the PBO + P + C group (44.8%; 95% CI 34.1-55.9), with a difference of - 18.5% (95% CI - 32.0 - (- 4.3); one-sided P = 0.9948). The E + P + C group had a numerically higher percentage of confirmed responders with extended response ≥ 6 months (29.2% vs. 15.4%). Circulating kynurenine levels at C1D1 were similar to those at C2D1 in all treatment groups and were not reduced to normal levels with epacadostat 100 mg BID plus P + C. The safety profile of E + P + C was consistent with that for PBO + P + C. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of epacadostat 100 mg BID to pembrolizumab and platinum-based chemotherapy was generally well tolerated but did not improve ORR in patients with treatment-naïve metastatic NSCLC. Evaluating epacadostat doses that normalize circulating kynurenine in combination with CPIs may help determine the clinical potential of this combination. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03322566. Registered October 26, 2017.

Pembrolizumab plus epacadostat in patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (KEYNOTE-669/ECHO-304): a phase 3, randomized, open-label study.

BACKGROUND: Advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) has a poor prognosis, and new treatment options are needed. Combining immunotherapies with differing mechanisms of action may enhance clinical benefits compared with single-agent immunotherapy. Epacadostat, an indoleamine 2,3 dioxygenase 1 inhibitor, plus pembrolizumab, a PD-1 inhibitor, showed promising activity in advanced HNSCC in the phase 1/2 KEYNOTE-037/ECHO-202 trial. METHODS: KEYNOTE-669/ECHO-304 is a randomized, open-label, phase 3 study evaluating the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab plus epacadostat, pembrolizumab monotherapy, and the EXTREME regimen (cetuximab with a platinum [carboplatin or cisplatin] and 5-fluorouracil) in recurrent/metastatic (R/M) HNSCC. Participants had no prior systemic therapy for R/M HNSCC and were randomly assigned (2:1:2) to pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks plus epacadostat 100 mg orally twice daily, pembrolizumab monotherapy, or EXTREME. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR; investigator assessment). Secondary endpoints were safety and tolerability. Change in serum kynurenine was an exploratory endpoint. Study enrollment was discontinued early as a strategic decision on May 2, 2018, and response assessment was discontinued after first on-study imaging assessment at week 9. Data cut-off was January 17, 2019. RESULTS: Between December 1, 2017, and May 2, 2018, 89 patients were randomly allocated to pembrolizumab plus epacadostat (n = 35), pembrolizumab monotherapy (n = 19), or EXTREME (n = 35). ORR (95% CI) was 31% (17%-49%) for pembrolizumab plus epacadostat, 21% (6%-46%) for pembrolizumab monotherapy, and 34% (19%-52%) for EXTREME. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 82% (n = 28) of patients receiving pembrolizumab plus epacadostat, 63% (n = 12) receiving pembrolizumab monotherapy, and 100% (n = 34) receiving EXTREME. Grade 3-4 TRAEs occurred in 24% (n = 8) of patients receiving pembrolizumab plus epacadostat, 16% (n = 3) receiving pembrolizumab monotherapy, and 82% (n = 28) receiving EXTREME. No deaths occurred due to AEs. Pembrolizumab plus epacadostat treatment reduced kynurenine levels but not to that of healthy subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Pembrolizumab plus epacadostat and pembrolizumab monotherapy provided a similar response rate to EXTREME and demonstrated a manageable safety profile in patients with R/M HNSCC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03358472. Date of trial registration: November 30, 2017.

Epacadostat plus pembrolizumab versus placebo plus pembrolizumab for advanced urothelial carcinoma: results from the randomized phase III ECHO-303/KEYNOTE-698 study.

BACKGROUND: Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) levels correlate with poor outcomes in urothelial carcinoma (UC). IDO1 and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) are often co-expressed. Epacadostat is a potent and highly selective inhibitor of IDO1. In a subgroup analysis of patients with advanced UC participating in a phase I/II study, epacadostat-pembrolizumab treatment produced an objective response rate (ORR) of 35%. METHODS: ECHO-303/KEYNOTE-698 was a double-blinded, randomized phase III study of adults with metastatic or unresectable locally advanced UC with recurrence or progression following first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Participants were randomized to epacadostat 100 mg twice daily (BID) plus pembrolizumab or placebo plus pembrolizumab until completion of 35 pembrolizumab infusions, disease progression, or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed ORR per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. RESULTS: Target enrollment was 648 patients; enrollment was halted early based on efficacy results from the phase III ECHO-301/KEYNOTE-252 study in metastatic melanoma. Forty-two patients were randomized to each treatment arm. Median duration of follow-up was 62 days in each arm. The investigator-assessed ORR (unconfirmed) was 26.2% (95% CI 16.35-48.11) for epacadostat plus pembrolizumab and 11.9% (95% CI 4.67-29.50) for placebo plus pembrolizumab. Two complete responses were reported, both in the placebo-plus-pembrolizumab arm. Circulating kynurenine levels increased from C1D1 to C2D1 in the placebo-plus-pembrolizumab arm and numerically decreased in the epacadostat-plus-pembrolizumab arm. The safety profile of epacadostat plus pembrolizumab was similar to that of pembrolizumab monotherapy, although a numerically greater proportion of patients in the combination vs. control arm experienced treatment-related grade ≥ 3 adverse events (16.7% vs. 7.3%). One patient in each arm died due to cardiovascular events, which were not deemed drug-related. No new safety concerns were identified for either agent. CONCLUSIONS: Epacadostat plus pembrolizumab demonstrated anti-tumor activity and was generally tolerable as second-line treatment of patients with unresectable locally advanced or recurrent/progressive metastatic UC. Epacadostat 100 mg BID, when administered with pembrolizumab, did not normalize circulating kynurenine in most patients. Further study of combined IDO1/PD-L1 inhibition in this patient population, particularly with epacadostat doses that result in durable normalization of circulating kynurenine, may be warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03374488. Registered 12/15/2017.

Epacadostat plus pembrolizumab versus placebo plus pembrolizumab as first-line treatment for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer with high levels of programmed death-ligand 1: a randomized, double-blind phase 2 study.

BACKGROUND: Pembrolizumab is a first-line therapy for certain patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Combining pembrolizumab with other immunotherapies may enhance tumor cell killing and clinical outcomes. Epacadostat is a selective inhibitor of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1, an immuno-regulatory enzyme involved in tryptophan to kynurenine metabolism that inhibits T cell-mediated immune responses. METHODS: In this randomized phase II study, patients with metastatic NSCLC expressing high (≥ 50%) programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) levels received pembrolizumab 200 mg every 21 days plus oral epacadostat 100 mg twice daily (combination) or matching placebo (control). The primary objective was objective response rate (ORR); secondary objectives were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), duration of response (DOR) and safety/tolerability. RESULTS: 154 patients were randomized (77 per group). Median (range) follow-up was 6.8 months (0.1-11.4) and 7.0 months (0.2-11.9) in the combination and control groups, respectively Confirmed ORR was similar between groups (combination: 32.5%, 95% CI 22.2-44.1; control: 39.0%, 95% CI 28.0-50.8; difference: - 6.5, 95% CI - 21.5 to 8.7; 1-sided P = 0.8000). Median (range) DOR was 6.2 months (1.9 + to 6.5 +) and not reached (1.9 + to 8.6 +) in the combination and control groups, respectively. Although not formally tested, median PFS was 6.7 and 6.2 months for the combination and control groups, respectively, and median OS was not reached in either group. Circulating kynurenine levels increased from C1D1 to C2D1 (P < 0.01) in the control group and decreased from C1D1 to C2D1 (P < 0.01) in the combination group but were not normalized in most patients. The most frequent serious adverse events (AEs) (≥ 2%) were pneumonia (4.0%), anemia (2.7%), atelectasis (2.7%) and pneumonitis (2.7%) in the combination group and pneumonia (3.9%), pneumonitis (2.6%) and hypotension (2.6%) in the control group. Two deaths due to drug-related AEs were reported, both in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of epacadostat to pembrolizumab therapy for PD-L1-high metastatic NSCLC was generally well tolerated but did not demonstrate an improved therapeutic effect. Evaluating higher doses of epacadostat that normalize kynurenine levels when given in combination with checkpoint inhibitors may be warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03322540. Registered 10/26/2017.

Pembrolizumab plus either epacadostat or placebo for cisplatin-ineligible urothelial carcinoma: results from the ECHO-307/KEYNOTE-672 study.

BACKGROUND: Indoleamine 2,3- dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) is an immunosuppressive enzyme that has been correlated with shorter disease-specific survival in patients with urothelial carcinoma (UC). IDO1 may counteract the antitumor effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Epacadostat is a potent and highly selective inhibitor of IDO1. In the phase I/II ECHO-202/KEYNOTE-037 study, epacadostat plus pembrolizumab resulted in a preliminary objective response rate (ORR) of 35% in a cohort of patients with advanced UC. METHODS: ECHO-307/KEYNOTE-672 was a double-blinded, randomized, phase III study. Eligible adults had confirmed locally advanced/unresectable or metastatic UC of the urinary tract and were ineligible to receive cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive epacadostat (100 mg twice daily) plus pembrolizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks) or placebo plus pembrolizumab for up to 35 pembrolizumab infusions. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed ORR per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (version 1.1). RESULTS: A total of 93 patients were randomized (epacadostat plus pembrolizumab, n = 44; placebo plus pembrolizumab, n = 49). Enrollment was stopped early due to emerging data from the phase III ECHO-301/KEYNOTE-252 study. The median duration of follow-up was 64 days in both arms. Based on all available data at cutoff, ORR (unconfirmed) was 31.8% (95% CI, 22.46-55.24%) for epacadostat plus pembrolizumab and 24.5% (95% CI, 15.33-43.67%) for placebo plus pembrolizumab. Circulating kynurenine levels numerically increased from C1D1 to C2D1 in the placebo-plus-pembrolizumab arm and decreased in the epacadostat-plus-pembrolizumab arm. Epacadostat-plus-pembrolizumab combination treatment was well tolerated with a safety profile similar to the placebo arm. Treatment discontinuations due to treatment-related adverse events were more frequent with epacadostat (11.6% vs. 4.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with epacadostat plus pembrolizumab resulted in a similar ORR and safety profile as placebo plus pembrolizumab in cisplatin-ineligible patients with previously untreated locally advanced/unresectable or metastatic UC. At a dose of 100 mg twice daily, epacadostat did not appear to completely normalize circulating kynurenine levels when administered with pembrolizumab. Larger studies with longer follow-up and possibly testing higher doses of epacadostat, potentially in different therapy settings, may be warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03361865, retrospectively registered December 5, 2017.

Clinical Outcomes of Enfortumab Vedotin in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma With Prior Avelumab Versus Pembrolizumab Therapy.

BACKGROUND/AIM: This study retrospectively evaluated whether enfortumab vedotin (EV) monotherapy is effective as a late-line treatment according to prior treatment type in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We assessed consecutive patients from the Uro-Oncology Group in the Kyushu study population with lower and upper urinary tract cancer treated with EV monotherapy after platinum-based chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy failure between December 2021 and March 2024. In particular, patients receiving avelumab maintenance or pembrolizumab therapy before EV for advanced UC were analyzed and compared according to the response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Of the 80 enrolled patients, 31 and 49 received avelumab and pembrolizumab before EV therapy, respectively. The avelumab and pembrolizumab groups had comparable objective response rates (48.4% vs. 44.9%, p=0.820) and disease control rates (77.4% vs. 67.3%, p=0.448). These two groups showed no significant difference in PFS from the initiation of EV (median: 6.4 months vs. 4.2 months, p=0.184); meanwhile, the avelumab group had better OS from the initiation of EV than the pembrolizumab group (median: 16.0 months vs. 10.2 months, p=0.019). Moreover, the median OS after first-line chemotherapy initiation was longer in the avelumab group than in the pembrolizumab group (40.3 months vs. 24.7 months, p=0.054). On multivariate analysis, avelumab maintenance therapy before EV reduced the mortality risk by 47% (95% confidence interval=0.27-1.03; p=0.059). CONCLUSION: EV monotherapy after avelumab maintenance therapy provides favorable survival outcomes in patients with advanced UC.

A case of biopsy-proven acute interstitial nephritis following atezolizumab-bevacizumab treatment of advanced unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) represented a significant breakthrough in cancer therapy. Recently, the combined use of atezolizumab and bevacizumab was approved as first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Exposure to a novel and diverse spectrum of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) has increased with the growing utilization of ICIs, however, a comprehensive understanding surrounding newer agents is still lacking. The incidence of kidney toxicities is rare but rising, often underreported due to the lack of confirmatory biopsies. Here, we present a rare case of biopsy-proven acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) following atezolizumab-bevacizumab treatment of advanced unresectable HCC. CASE: An 84-year-old male with T4N0M0 hepatocellular carcinoma was admitted after cycle 5 of atezolizumab due to decreased urine output and dysuria with a serum creatine of 4.7 mg/dL compared to a baseline of 1.3 mg/dL. To confirm the diagnosis of possible intrinsic renal injury, an ultrasound-guided non-focal biopsy of the left kidney was performed, revealing AIN. Potential exacerbatory medications, such as proton-pump inhibitors, were discontinued. The patient was discharged on oral steroids with improvement in serum creatinine. Before completing the steroid taper, the patient developed pneumocystis pneumonia and eventually transitioned to hospice care. CONCLUSION: This case highlights the valuable role renal biopsy can play in accurately capturing irAEs and guiding appropriate management in the setting of ICI-induced AKI. It also exemplifies important considerations for steroid treatment of irAEs in the setting of comorbidities, such as diabetes.

Successful Application of Tocilizumab in a Patient With Neoadjuvant Immunochemotherapy-Induced Cytokine Release Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The expansion of preoperative immunochemotherapy has led to an increase in the number of patients with lung cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Therefore, oncologists should manage a variety of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). One of the rare, life-threatening, and recently proposed irAEs is cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Although the standard treatment of irAE is systemic administration of steroids, it has been suggested that tocilizumab may be an effective treatment option for CRS. CASE: This case describes a 69-year-old man with stage IIIA lung adenocarcinoma who received chemotherapy and nivolumab, which is an ICI, as neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy. After the first administration, the patient developed severe skin rash, fever, and arthralgia. We suspected irAEs and administered systemic steroids. However, fever and arthralgia did not improve, although the skin rash disappeared. These were also significant challenges for surgery. Noting the elevated levels of inflammatory cytokines, we consulted a rheumatologist. Finally, we decided to terminate neoadjuvant therapy after one cycle and administer tocilizumab. Tocilizumab dramatically improved the patient's symptoms and allowed him to undergo radical surgery. Pathological findings revealed that the patient achieved a major pathological response. CONCLUSION: This indicates the potential effectiveness of early tocilizumab administration for ICI-induced CRS, even in mild cases.

Neoadjuvant treatment with lenvatinib and pembrolizumab in a BRAF V600E-mutated anaplastic thyroid cancer: a case report.

Background: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immunotherapy have been proposed for advanced metastatic anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC). We report a case of BRAF V600E-mutated ATC in which lenvatinib (L) plus pembrolizumab (P) enabled neoadjuvant treatment. Case presentation: A male patient aged 65 years presented with a rapidly enlarging left latero-cervical mass. Fine needle aspiration was suggestive of ATC. Surgical consultation excluded radical surgery. While awaiting molecular profile analysis and considering the fast evolution of the disease, treatment with L and P was started. L was started at a dose of 14 mg daily, while P was started at the standard regimen (200 mg every 3 weeks). After 1 month, computerized tomography showed a reduction in the mass with almost complete colliquative degeneration, and the carotid artery wall was free from infiltration. Radical surgery was performed. Histology confirmed papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) in the left lobe and ATC with extensive necrosis in the left latero-cervical lymph node metastasis. The margins were free of tumors (R0). A BRAF V600E mutation was present in both PTC and ATC. At the 1-year follow-up, the patient was free of disease. Conclusion: L and P in combination also appeared to be effective as a neoadjuvant treatment for BRAF V600E-mutated ATC. This combination treatment could be used when there is an opportunity for complete resection of the cancer, and as soon as possible. The intermediate dose of 14 mg of L appeared to be well tolerated and effective.

Neoadjuvant and adjuvant pembrolizumab in advanced high-grade serous carcinoma: the randomized phase II NeoPembrOV clinical trial.

This open-label, non-comparative, 2:1 randomized, phase II trial (NCT03275506) in women with stage IIIC/IV high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) for whom upfront complete resection was unachievable assessed whether adding pembrolizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks) to standard-of-care carboplatin plus paclitaxel yielded a complete resection rate (CRR) of at least 50%. Postoperatively patients continued assigned treatment for a maximum of 2 years. Postoperative bevacizumab was optional. The primary endpoint was independently assessed CRR at interval debulking surgery. Secondary endpoints were Completeness of Cytoreduction Index (CCI) and peritoneal cancer index (PCI) scores, objective and best response rates, progression-free survival, overall survival, safety, postoperative morbidity, and pathological complete response. The CRR in 61 pembrolizumab-treated patients was 74% (one-sided 95% CI = 63%), exceeding the prespecified ≥50% threshold and meeting the primary objective. The CRR without pembrolizumab was 70% (one-sided 95% CI = 54%). In the remaining patients CCI scores were ≥3 in 27% of the standard-of-care group and 18% of the investigational group and CC1 in 3% of the investigational group. PCI score decreased by a mean of 9.6 in the standard-of-care group and 10.2 in the investigational group. Objective response rates were 60% and 72%, respectively, and best overall response rates were 83% and 90%, respectively. Progression-free survival was similar with the two regimens (median 20.8 versus 19.4 months in the standard-of-care versus investigational arms, respectively) but overall survival favored pembrolizumab-containing therapy (median 35.3 versus 49.8 months, respectively). The most common grade ≥3 adverse events with pembrolizumab-containing therapy were anemia during neoadjuvant therapy and infection/fever postoperatively. Pembrolizumab was discontinued prematurely because of adverse events in 23% of pembrolizumab-treated patients. Combining pembrolizumab with neoadjuvant chemotherapy is feasible for HGSC considered not completely resectable; observed activity in some subgroups justifies further evaluation to improve understanding of the role of immunotherapy in HGSC.

Efficacy and safety of faricimab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of faricimab compared with other anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents in treating neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A systematic review (SR) was conducted up to January 2023. Network meta-analyses (NMA) were performed, including sensitivity and subgroup analyses for naïve population. Outcomes included changes in visual acuity (Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study [ETDRS] letters), anatomical changes, frequency of injections and adverse events. The Cochrane Collaboration guidelines and the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis framework were used for the SR and the certainty of evidence, respectively. RESULTS: From 4128 identified records through electronic databases and complementary searches, 63 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) met the eligibility criteria, with 42 included in the NMA. Faricimab showed a significant reduction in the number of annual injections compared with most fixed and flexible anti-VEGF treatment regimens, while showing no statistically significant differences in visual acuity through ETDRS letter gain, demonstrating a comparable efficacy. Retinal thickness results showed comparable efficacy to other anti-VEGF agents, and inferior only to brolucizumab. Results also showed that more patients treated with faricimab were free from post-treatment retinal fluid compared with aflibercept every 8 weeks, and both ranibizumab and bevacizumab, in the fixed and pro re nata (PRN) assessed schedules. Faricimab showed a comparable safety profile regarding the risk of ocular adverse events and serious ocular adverse events (SOAE), except for the comparison with brolucizumab quarterly, in which faricimab showed a significant reduction for SOAE risk. CONCLUSION: Faricimab showed a comparable clinical benefit in efficacy and safety outcomes, with a reduction in annual injections compared with fixed and flexible anti-VEGF drug regimens, representing a valuable treatment option for nAMD patients. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023394226.

Opsoclonus-Ataxia Syndrome in a Patient With Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

OBJECTIVES: To describe a case of post-immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) opsoclonus-myoclonus-ataxia syndrome (OMAS), with complete clinical remission after treatment. METHODS: A 52-year-old man was admitted because of subacute-onset vertigo, dysarthria, vomiting, and weight loss. He was under atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1) monotherapy (23 cycles) for metastatic small-cell lung cancer, with excellent response. RESULTS: On examination (1 month after symptom onset), the patient had opsoclonus, dysarthria, severe truncal and gait ataxia, and mild appendicular ataxia without myoclonus (SARA score 26/40). Brain MRI showed mild cerebellar atrophy, and CSF analysis disclosed pleocytosis and oligoclonal bands. Anti-SOX1 antibodies were detected in serum and CSF. Atezolizumab was stopped, and corticosteroids and monthly IV immunoglobulins were administered. Chemotherapy (carboplatin and etoposide) was also started because of cancer progression. Three months later, examination showed regression of the opsoclonus, truncal ataxia, and dysarthria and persistence of very mild gait ataxia (SARA score 3.5/40), which completely regressed at last examination (20 months after onset). DISCUSSION: The clinical pattern and reversibility bring the present case close to a few patients with paraneoplastic OMAS described before the ICI era. More research is needed to clarify the pathogenesis and outcomes of OMAS in the context of ICI.

Neoadjuvant inetetamab and pertuzumab with taxanes and carboplatin (TCbIP) In locally advanced HER2-positive breast cancer: a prospective cohort study with propensity-matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: Inetetamab is the first domestically developed innovative anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody in China, proven effective and safe in HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. However, its efficacy and safety in neoadjuvant treatment of HER2-positive locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) remain to be validated. METHODS: This prospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of inetetamab combined with pertuzumab, taxanes, and carboplatin (TCbIP) in neoadjuvant therapy for HER2-positive LABC, comparing it to data from patients treated with the TCbHP regimen (trastuzumab combined with pertuzumab, taxanes, and carboplatin) using propensity score matching (PSM). The primary endpoint was total pathological complete response (tpCR). Adverse events (AEs), objective response rate (ORR), and near-pCR were key secondary endpoints. RESULTS: Forty-four patients with clinical stage IIA-IIIC HER2-positive LABC were prospectively enrolled and treated with the TCbIP regimen. The tpCR rate among 28 patients who completed surgery was 60.7%, comparable to and slightly higher than the TCbHP group in PSM (60.7% vs. 53.6%, P = 0.510). The ORR was 96.4%, and the DCR reached 100.0%. The most common ≥ grade 3 AE was neutropenia (21.4% vs. 11.9%, P = 0.350). No significant reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction was observed, and no patient withdrew from treatment due to AEs. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant therapy with TCbIP showed good efficacy and safety in patients with HER2-positive LABC and might be another promising option for neoadjuvant treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05749016 (registration date: Nov 01, 2021).