Trajectories of daily antipsychotic use and weight gain in people hospitalized for the first episode of psychosis.

BACKGROUND: We need to better understand the risk factors and predictors of medication-related weight gain to improve metabolic health of individuals with schizophrenia. This study explores how trajectories of antipsychotic medication (AP) use impact body weight early in the course of schizophrenia. METHODS: We recruited 92 participants with first-episode psychosis (FEP, n = 92) during their first psychiatric hospitalization. We prospectively collected weight, body mass index (BMI), metabolic markers, and exact daily medication exposure during 6-week hospitalization. We quantified the trajectory of AP medication changes and AP polypharmacy using a novel approach based on meta-analytical ranking of medications and tested it as a predictor of weight gain together with traditional risk factors. RESULTS: Most people started treatment with risperidone (n = 57), followed by olanzapine (n = 29). Then, 48% of individuals remained on their first prescribed medication, while 33% of people remained on monotherapy. Almost half of the individuals (39/92) experienced escalation of medications, mostly switch to AP polypharmacy (90%). Only baseline BMI was a predictor of BMI change. Individuals in the top tercile of weight gain, compared to those in the bottom tercile, showed lower follow-up symptoms, a trend for longer prehospitalization antipsychotic treatment, and greater exposure to metabolically problematic medications. CONCLUSIONS: Early in the course of illness, during inpatient treatment, baseline BMI is the strongest and earliest predictor of weight gain on APs and is a better predictor than type of medication, polypharmacy, or medication switches. Baseline BMI predicted weight change over a period of weeks, when other traditional predictors demonstrated a much smaller effect.

Efficacy and tolerability of antipsychotic polypharmacy for schizophrenia spectrum disorders. A systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data.

BACKGROUND: Antipsychotic polypharmacy (APP) is frequently prescribed for schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. Despite the inconsistent findings on efficacy, APP may be beneficial for subgroups of psychotic patients. This meta-analysis of individual patient data investigated moderators of efficacy and tolerability of APP in adult patients with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. DESIGN: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Randomized Trials until September 1, 2022, for randomized controlled trials comparing APP with antipsychotic monotherapy. We estimated the effects with a one-stage approach for patient-level moderators and a two-stage approach for study-level moderators, using (generalized) linear mixed-effects models. Primary outcome was treatment response, defined as a reduction of 25 % or more in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) score. Secondary outcomes were study discontinuation, and changes from baseline on the PANSS total score, its positive and negative symptom subscale scores, the Clinical Global Impressions Scale (CGI), and adverse effects. RESULTS: We obtained individual patient data from 10 studies (602 patients; 31 % of all possible patients) and included 599 patients in our analysis. A higher baseline PANSS total score increased the chance of a response to APP (OR = 1.41, 95 % CI 1.02; 1.94, p = 0.037 per 10-point increase in baseline PANSS total), mainly driven by baseline positive symptoms. The same applied to changes on the PANSS positive symptom subscale and the CGI severity scale. Extrapyramidal side effects increased significantly where first and second-generation antipsychotics were co-prescribed. Study discontinuation was comparable between both treatment arms. CONCLUSIONS: APP was effective in severely psychotic patients with high baseline PANSS total scores and predominantly positive symptoms. This effect must be weighed against potential adverse effects.

Therapeutic Effects, Side Effects, and Adverse Effects of Neuropsychiatric Drugs in the Context of Treating Cancer-Related Anorexia With Olanzapine and Mirtazapine.

Drugs have actions that may be classified as therapeutic effects and side effects; side effects are actions that do not contribute to therapeutic benefit. Some side effects are neutral; others, experienced as undesirable or unpleasant, are recorded as adverse effects. Some drug actions are therapeutic for some disorders and adverse for others; or therapeutic during acute illness and adverse during maintenance treatment. As an example, anticholinergic action may be adverse when a tricyclic antidepressant is used to treat depression but therapeutic when the drug is used to treat irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea. In clinical practice, side or adverse effects of a drug may be leveraged to manage troublesome symptoms. As an example, the sedative effect of a low dose of trazodone may be useful for some patients with insomnia. With this background, studies have examined whether the increase in appetite and weight associated with olanzapine and mirtazapine may be effective against anorexia and cachexia associated with cancer and cancer chemotherapy. The subject is important because cachexia may be present in 30%-50% of patients with cancer (with higher prevalence in patients with more advanced cancer) and because the presence of cachexia is associated with a higher risk of disease progression and mortality. Many randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have examined pharmacologic interventions such as progestins, corticosteroids, anamorelin, and medical cannabis for cancer related cachexia; most results have been disappointing. A recent RCT found that olanzapine (2.5 mg/d for 12 weeks) improved appetite, weight, other nutritional parameters, and quality of life in patients with locally advanced or metastatic cancer treated with chemotherapy. Another RCT, however, found that mirtazapine (30 mg/d for 8 weeks) brought no nutritional or anthropometric gain in patients with cancer and anorexia. It is concluded that olanzapine but not mirtazapine merits further investigation in patients with cancer who have anorexia and cachexia.

Effective and safe use of intramuscular clozapine in a patient presenting with catatonia and thrombocytopenia.

Clozapine is the most effective medication for the management of treatment-resistant schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder, and its discontinuation can pose significant challenges in treatment. We present a patient with a diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder who was stable on clozapine for a decade until discontinuation due to thrombocytopenia. She experienced a relapse of her illness, presenting with psychotic and catatonic features with poor oral intake and physical health complications requiring a lengthy admission to the hospital. There was a poor response to alternative antipsychotics and a full course of electroconvulsive therapy. Intramuscular (IM) clozapine was initiated due to catatonia and refusal to accept oral medications. After receiving 10 doses of IM clozapine, she started accepting oral clozapine and made a full recovery within a few weeks. The low platelet count was persistent, and a bone marrow biopsy showed results consistent with immune thrombocytopenia being the cause of that low platelet count.

Steroid-induced psychosis: a spectrum of neuropsychiatric glucocorticoid side effects.

Glucocorticoid-induced neuropsychiatric side effects have been known since their initial usage and frequently manifest in clinical settings. Despite this, they remain unpredictable, variable and complex to manage, impacting patient outcomes and the healthcare system.We report a case of glucocorticoid-induced psychosis after the administration of dexamethasone post-neurosurgical intervention and its evolution with the initiation of chemotherapy. Although initially manic symptoms were prominent, with the beginning of chemotherapy psychotic symptoms dominated the clinical presentation, followed by depressive symptoms. Despite challenges in diagnosis and management, including adverse reactions to antipsychotic treatment, this case provides critical insights into the variable and dynamic nature of neuropsychiatric side effects induced by glucocorticoids.

Effect of long-term use of antipsychotics on the ventricular repolarization index.

BACKGROUND: The risk of arrhythmia is usually assessed by the length of the corrected QT interval (QTc) when patients use antipsychotics. Prolonged QTc intervals are thought to increase the probability of malignant ventricular arrhythmias, and if we focus only on the QTc interval, we may be influenced by a single factor and make decisions that are not conducive to effective treatment. The index of cardiac electrophysiological balance (iCEB) is considered more valuable than the QTc for predicting drug-induced arrhythmias. It has been used in clinical practice, but no studies have observed changes in this index after the use of antipsychotics. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the changes in ventricular repolarization indices and the occurrence of arrhythmias in patients who have been using antipsychotic drugs for a long time, to compare the changes in iCEBc and QTc and to predict abnormal iCEBc values. METHODS: Patients with schizophrenia who had been hospitalized for more than 4 years and who were receiving atypical antipsychotics underwent a 12-lead synchronized electrocardiogram (ECG) every 2-4 weeks. The baseline data were measured at admission, defined as the baseline (time0), and the most obvious abnormal changes in ventricular depolarization and repolarization measured every 12 months were one-year follow-up (time1), two-year follow-up (time2), three-year follow-up (time3), and four-year follow-up (time4). Repeated measures analysis of variance was used for comparisons. The types and doses of drugs taken at 5 time points were recorded and converted into chlorpromazine equivalents for comparison. The incidence of arrhythmia during the observation cycle was recorded. RESULTS: The patients had been treated with antipsychotic medication for 4 years, and the duration of the QRS wave was longer in males than in females. TpTe, TpTe/QRS, TpTe/QT, TpTe/QTc, iCEB, and iCEBc increased significantly with hospital stay, while TpTe, TpTe/QRS, TpTe/QT, and TpTe/QTc exhibited more obvious changes in these indicators in female patients (P < 0.01). The changes in iCEB and iCEBc were more significant in males (P < 0.01). The incidences of arrhythmia (arrhythmic events included premature ventricular beats and premature atrial beats) within 5 time points were 2.5%, 6.25%, 6.25%, 6.25% and 5%, respectively. More than 90% of patients treated with antipsychotics did not have any arrhythmias. No TdP syncope or other cardiovascular symptoms were found in any of the patients. CONCLUSION: After long-term use of antipsychotics, the ventricular repolarization index gradually increased with time. The new ventricular repolarization indices iCEB and iCEBc were more sensitive than the QTc at predicting arrhythmia. According to the abnormal QTc values in men and women, we predict that the abnormal value of the iCEBc in males is 4.528 and that in females is 5.315.

Atypical Presentation of Ziprasidone-Induced Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome: A Case Report.

Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) is a severe adverse reaction associated with neuroleptic or antipsychotic drugs. This case report discusses a 43-year-old man with a history of bipolar disorder and polysubstance abuse who presented with altered mental status, autonomic dysfunction, and muscular rigidity. The patient had recently started on ziprasidone, a second-generation antipsychotic, leading to an atypical presentation of NMS. Unlike classic findings associated with NMS induced by first-generation antipsychotics, this case lacked high fever, lead pipe rigidity, or elevated creatine kinase levels greater than 1000 on initial presentation. The delay in diagnosis was attributed to the milder symptoms and absence of typical findings, resulting in extensive diagnostic workup and interventions. The patient responded positively to treatment with lorazepam based on the Woodbury severity stage guidelines. This case underscores the complexity of diagnosing NMS induced by second-generation antipsychotics and highlights the need for awareness and tailored treatment approaches for atypical presentations.

Severe neutropenia unrelated to clozapine in patients receiving clozapine.

BACKGROUND: Clozapine is known to cause agranulocytosis. Mandatory monitoring schemes are aimed at reducing the risk of agranulocytosis and of the consequences of agranulocytosis. All cases of agranulocytosis occurring in people prescribed clozapine are assumed to be caused by clozapine. METHODS: In a previous study, we examined a cohort of patients listed on our hospital database as having had clozapine-induced agranulocytosis and applied specific criteria to identify those with confirmed clozapine-related, life-threatening agranulocytosis. In this study, we examine the cases not meeting these specific criteria. RESULTS: In the original study, 9 of 23 cases met the criteria for clozapine-induced, life-threatening agranulocytosis. Of the 13 remaining cases for whom data were available, 5 were probably caused by clozapine but were not life-threatening. Three cases were the result of concomitant cancer chemotherapy. Three were anomalous results probably related to measurement error. For the remaining two cases, the cause was not identified. CONCLUSION: Not all cases of agranulocytosis occurring in people taking clozapine are caused by clozapine. The widely used threshold criterion-based diagnosis overestimates the risk of agranulocytosis. True clozapine-related agranulocytosis is best identified by pattern-based criteria: rapid fall in neutrophil counts over around 2 weeks to below 0.5 × 109/L for two consecutive days (unless clozapine is stopped very early or granulocyte colony stimulating factor is given) where other possible causes (benign ethnic neutropenia, cancer chemotherapy) can be ruled out.

Antipsychotic medications and severe sepsis in schizophrenia: A nested case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Sepsis constitutes a condition that involves life-threatening organ dysfunction induced by severe infection. This nested case-control study investigated risk factors for severe sepsis and whether antipsychotic use is associated with severe sepsis risk in patients with schizophrenia, a topic that has not been comprehensively explored in previous studies. METHODS: We selected 39,432 patients with schizophrenia aged between 15 and 65 years from Taiwan's Psychiatric Inpatient Medical Claims database for the period 2000-2012. The case group comprised patients with severe sepsis after their first psychiatric admission (n = 1382). The case and control groups were randomly matched (1:4) by age, sex and first psychiatric admission (year) and finally comprised 1382 and 5528 individuals, respectively. We employed multivariable conditional logistic regression to identify (1) risk factors (physical illnesses and nonpsychiatric medications) and (2) antipsychotic-severe sepsis associations. RESULTS: Higher numbers of psychiatric admissions and physical illnesses such as delirium, cerebrovascular disease and cancer were significantly associated with a higher risk of severe sepsis. Furthermore, severe sepsis was associated with the use of antithrombotic agents, systemic corticosteroids and agents targeting the renin-angiotensin system. Clozapine (adjusted risk ratio = 1.65) and quetiapine (adjusted risk ratio = 1.59) use were associated with an increased risk of severe sepsis. The use of more than one antipsychotic drug could further increase this risk. CONCLUSION: Several physical illnesses and nonpsychiatric medications increase the risk of severe sepsis in patients with schizophrenia. Specifically, clozapine or quetiapine use significantly increased the risk of severe sepsis in these patients.

The incidence risk of gynecological cancer by antipsychotic use: a meta-analysis of 50,402 patients.

BACKGROUND: Female gynecological cancers represent a serious public health problem, with 1,398,601 new diagnoses and 671,875 deaths per year worldwide. Antipsychotics are often used in psychiatric disorders, including schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depression. It is estimated that the prescription of these drugs is linked to 1,800 deaths a year in the United States, but their association with cancer remains controversial. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for studies reporting the correlation in the incidence risk of gynecological cancer by antipsychotic use. We used DerSimonian and Laird random-effect models to compute logit transformed odds ratio (OR) for the primary binary endpoint with 95% confidence interval (CI). Heterogeneity was assessed through effect size width along with I-squared and Tau-squared statistics. Review Manager 5.4.1. was used for statistical analyses. A p-value of < 0.05 denoted statistically significant. RESULTS: 50,402 patients were included, of whom 778 (1,54%) took antipsychotic medication for at least 1 year. 1,086 (2,15%) with ovarian cancer and 49,316 (97,85%) with endometrial cancer. Antipsychotic use (OR 1.50; 1.06 to 2.13 95% CI; p-value 0.02), hypertension (OR 1.50; 95% CI 1.06 to 2.13; p-value < 0.01), nulliparity (OR 1.98; 95% CI 1.53 to 2.57; p-value < 0.01) and multiparity (OR 0.53; 95% CI 0.41 to 0.69; p-value < 0.01) showed significantly different distributions between groups of cancer and cancer-free patients. The primary endpoint of incidence risk of gynecological cancer by antipsychotic therapy showed a statistically significant difference (OR 1.67; 95% CI 1.02 to 2.73; p-value < 0.05) against the use of antipsychotic drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis showed that the use of antipsychotic drugs increases the risk of gynecological cancers, particularly endometrial cancer. This result should be weighed against the potential effects of treatment for a balanced prescribing decision.

Psychotropic medications and mortality from cardiovascular disease and suicide for individuals with depression in Taiwan.

BACKGROUND: Polypharmacy for treatment of depression has been increasing in Taiwan. METHODS: Individuals having depressive disorders were identified in a national database for healthcare services and followed up for 5 years. The mean dosage of antidepressants, antipsychotics, mood stabilizers, and sedative-hypnotics was calculated; the associations between the exposure dosage to different psychotropic medications and patients' overall death and death due to cardiovascular diseases (CVD) and suicide were examined. RESULTS: A total of 400,042 individuals with depressive disorders (63.8% women) were identified. Compared with those with no exposure to antidepressants, patients prescribed antidepressants had decreased mortality. Use of antipsychotics had a dose-related increase in overall mortality risk compared to no exposure group. Contrarily, depressed patients taking sedative-hypnotics had decreased overall and CVD mortality compared to no exposure group, with the most prominent decrease in CVD mortality of up to 54.9% for those in the moderate exposure group (hazard ratio: 0.451, 95% confidence interval: 0.405-0.503). A moderate or high dose of antidepressants or sedative-hypnotics was shown to be associated with a significantly increased mortality for suicide compared to those with no exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Antidepressant and sedative-hypnotic use was associated with decreased all-cause and CVD-related mortality and use of antipsychotics was associated with a dose-related increase in mortality risk. Future studies are needed to further clarify the involved mechanisms and benefits and risks should be carefully weighed when prescribing psychotropic medications in patients with depressive disorders.

Sex Differences Between Female and Male Individuals in Antipsychotic Efficacy and Adverse Effects in the Treatment of Schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Antipsychotics are core treatments for people living with psychotic disorders. Understanding individualised factors that influence both efficacy and adverse responses will improve outcomes. The objective of this study was to examine sex differences in antipsychotic-related efficacy and tolerability. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of data from phase 1 and 1a of Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE); participants with schizophrenia were randomly assigned to double-blinded treatment with oral olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, ziprasidone or perphenazine. Measures included Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) scale and Calgary Depression Rating Scale, as well as self-reported side effects, medication compliance, dosage, weight measurements and various blood parameters. RESULTS: There were 1460 participants including 380 female and 1080 male individuals. Very few differences existed between male and female participants in response, adverse reactions, compliance or antipsychotic dosage. However, significantly more female participants than male participants reported constipation (28% vs 16%), dry mouth (50% vs 38%), gynecomastia/galactorrhea (11% vs 3%), incontinence/nocturia (16% vs 8%) and self reported weight gain (37% vs 24%) [all p < 0.001]. Within the risperidone treatment group, there was a significantly greater increase in prolactin levels (p < 0.001) among female participants (n = 61) than male participants (n = 159). No overall differences in clinician-rated measures, weight gain or other laboratory indicators were found. CONCLUSIONS: While overall sex differences were limited across efficacy and tolerability for antipsychotic treatment, there were some specific findings with risperidone. Further examination of sex differences within antipsychotic trials will be important to improve efficacy and reduce adverse responses across as well as individualising care for people with schizophrenia.

Determining Ideal Management for Patients With Coexisting Prolactinomas and Psychiatric Symptoms: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: Prolactinomas-pituitary tumors that overproduce prolactin-can cause various troublesome symptoms. Dopamine agonists (DAs) reduce prolactin production in the prolactin pathway, making them the first-line treatment for prolactinomas. However, the main side effect of DA treatment, hyperdopaminergia, is an explicit etiology for psychiatric side effects. Psychiatric conditions are often treated with dopamine antagonists, which can induce hyperprolactinemia. This presents a challenge for patients with both a prolactinoma and a preexisting psychiatric condition, as treatment of one condition could worsen the other. This review seeks to identify an adequate therapeutic regimen for patients with coexisting prolactinomas and psychiatric symptoms. METHODS: This review examined PubMed citations from 1960 to 2023 published in English and involving human subjects. Case reports, case series, and cohort studies involving patients with concomitant prolactinomas and psychiatric symptoms, as validated by brain imaging, serologic prolactin levels, and medical history or chart reports of psychiatric symptoms, were included. RESULTS: Thematic analysis included 23 reports involving 42 participants; 27 of the 42 patients experienced a significant reduction in prolactin levels and psychiatric symptoms (64%). Treatment of those 42 patients included discontinuing or altering antipsychotic/dopamine antagonist therapy or discontinuing DA therapy to reduce psychiatric symptoms, with surgery or radiation postpharmacotherapy as a last-line strategy. However, in some cases (reported in Tables 2 to 4), either psychiatric or prolactin-related symptoms recurred despite adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians may find it beneficial to prioritize specific antipsychotics (aripiprazole, olanzapine, ziprasidone, or clozapine) over others (risperidone, thioridazine, thiothixene, and remoxipride). Discontinuing DA medication at least periodically until the patient's condition improves may also be advisable. If these 2 initial approaches do not yield a significant improvement in symptom management, surgery or radiation therapy may be considered. As patients may respond differently to these therapies, our study still recommends a patient-centered approach.

Potent synergistic effects of dulaglutide and food restriction in prevention of olanzapine-induced metabolic adverse effects in a rodent model.

BACKGROUND: Antipsychotics are indispensable in the treatment of severe mental illneses, however adverse metabolic effects including diabetes, weight gain, dyslipidemia, and related cardiovascular morbidity are common, and current pharmacological strategies for their management are unsatisfactory. Glucagon-like 1 peptide receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and obesity hold promise for the management of antipsychotic-associated adverse metabolic effects. METHODS: To characterize the molecular effects and identify biomarkers for GLP-1 RA preventive treatment, Sprague-Dawley female rats were treated with long-acting formulations of the antipsychotic olanzapine and the GLP-1 RA dulaglutide for 8 days. A pair-feeding protocol evaluated the combined effects of dulaglutide and food restriction on an olanzapine-induced metabolic phenotype. Body weight and food consumption were recorded. Biochemical analysis included a lipid profile, a spectrum of gastrointestinal and adipose tissue-derived hormones, and fibroblast growth factor 21 serum levels. RESULTS: Olanzapine induced hyperphagia, weight gain, increased serum triglycerides and HDL cholesterol. Food restriction affected the OLA-induced phenotype but not serum markers. Dulaglutide led to a modest decrease in food intake, with no effect on weight gain, and did not reverse the OLA-induced changes in serum lipid parameters. Concomitant dulaglutide and food restriction resulted in weight loss, decreased feed efficiency, and lower total and HDL cholesterol. CONCLUSIONS: A combined strategy of dulaglutide and food restriction manifested a massive synergistic benefit. GLP-1RAs represent a promising strategy and deserve thorough future research. Our findings underline the potential importance of lifestyle intervention in addition to GLP-1 RA treatment.

Time for a change to clozapine haematological monitoring.

OBJECTIVES: This paper critiques the haematological monitoring guidelines for clozapine. It describes the history of clozapine, as well as the pathophysiology and epidemiology of clozapine-induced neutropenia (CIN) and agranulocytosis (CIA). The paper appraises the extant literature on mandatory clozapine haematological monitoring. CONCLUSION: Contemporary Australian protocols for clozapine haematological monitoring are not consistent with the current evidence base. CIN and CIA are rare occurrences, and the associated risk of death is low. Potential modifications to existing guidelines include changing neutrophil thresholds for patients with benign ethnic neutropenia and reducing the frequency or removing haematological monitoring after two years of clozapine treatment.

Exploring Risk Factors for Adverse Reactions in Children with an Acute Psychotic Episode Using the Global Trigger Tool: Does Age Matter?

Aim: To establish significant risk factors for the development of adverse drug effects (ADEs) in children and adolescents with an acute psychotic episode taking antipsychotics. Materials and Methods: The research team randomly selected 15 patient records each month for 3 years (2016-2018). Overall, 450 patient records were included (223 boys and 227 girls, mean age was 14.52 ± 2.21 years). Adverse effects were identified using the standard algorithm of the Global Trigger Tool method. A "trigger" is an indication that an adverse reaction is likely to occur, e.g., an antihistamine prescription on a prescribing list. When a trigger was detected, the case history was studied in further detail to confirm the occurrence of ADEs. We divided patients into two groups: the "children" group (under 12 years old) and the "adolescents" group (13 years and older). Data were analyzed using the statistical package IBM SPSS Statistics 23.0. Results: Of the 450 patient records, 402 (89.3%) had at least one trigger detected. In total, 126 case histories contained evidence of ADE (28%). The total number of ADEs per 1000 patient days was 5.39 and the number of ADEs per 100 admissions was 32.0. Among adolescents, two or more triggers per patient were significantly more frequently identified (61.3% vs. 44.6%; p = 0.001). ADEs were rare in "Children" compared with "Adolescents" (13.8% vs. 30.4%; p = 0.006). The logistic regression analysis confirmed high predictive role of "Adolescence" (odds ratio [OR] = 2.58; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.22-5.4; p = 0.013), "Polypharmacy" (OR = 1.96; 95% CI 1.23-3.1; p = 0.004), and "First-life hospitalization" (OR = 2.17; 95% CI 1.34-3.48; p = 0.001) for ADE fact in patient records. Conclusion: We found that significant risk factors for ADEs to antipsychotics in patients with acute psychotic episode were adolescence (13 years and older), polypharmacy, and first-life hospitalization. The fact that children (i.e., younger than 13 years of age) are less likely to experience ADEs was not associated with high-risk drugs or higher doses in our study.

Prenatal aripiprazole induces alterations of rat placenta: a histological, immunohistochemical and ultrastructural study.

Antipsychotic drugs (APDs) are used to treat many psychiatric illnesses as schizophrenia. Typical antipsychotic drugs (TAPDs) are being used; however, they have many side effects. Atypical antipsychotic drugs (AAPDs) are newer medications with known fewer side effects. Aripiprazole (ARI) is an AAPD, recommended by healthcare providers, even during pregnancy. It can cross the placental barrier and enter fetal circulation, so it might be possible that ARI can adversely impair normal placental development and growth, if it is given prenatally. ARI was applied orally to pregnant female rats in two doses (3& 6 mg/kg body weight). On gestation day 20, the mothers were sacrificed, and the placentas were removed and processed for general histological and electron microscopic evaluations. Immunohistochemistry was done using anti-PCNA (proliferating cell nuclear antigen), anti-Bax (for apoptosis) and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor alpha (VEGFA). Morphological evaluation revealed degenerative changes in the placenta as dark nuclei, vacuolization, and cyst formation. Ultra-structurally, there was degeneration of cellular components including organelles and nuclei. These changes were found in different cells of the basal and labyrinth zones and were dose dependent. Immunohistochemistry revealed upregulation of Bax and VEGFA and downregulation of PCNA. Prenatal administration of the AAPD, ARI to pregnant female rats resulted in histological changes in the placenta. Additionally, there was a decrease in cellular proliferation and increase in apoptosis, and vascular impairment. This indicates placental atrophy and dysgenesis and might suggest possible teratogenic effects to ARI, which needs further evaluation.