RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Both atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) are common cardiovascular diseases. If the two exist together, the risk of stroke, hospitalization for HF and all-cause death is increased. Currently, research on left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) in patients with AF and HF is limited and controversial. This study was designed to investigate the safety and effectiveness of LAAC in AF patients with different types of HF. METHODS: Patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and HF who underwent LAAC in the First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University from August 2014 to July 2021 were enrolled. According to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), the study divided into HF with reduced ejection fraction (LVEF < 50%, HFrEF) group and HF with preserved ejection fraction (LVEF ≥ 50%, HFpEF) group. The data we collected from patients included: gender, age, comorbid diseases, CHA2DS2-VASc score, HAS-BLED score, NT-proBNP level, residual shunt, cardiac catheterization results, occluder size, postoperative medication regimen, transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) results and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) results, etc. Patients were followed up for stroke, bleeding, device related thrombus (DRT), pericardial tamponade, hospitalization for HF, and all-cause death within 2 years after surgery. Statistical methods were used to compare the differences in clinical outcome of LAAC in AF patients with different types of HF. RESULTS: Overall, 288 NVAF patients with HF were enrolled in this study, including 142 males and 146 females. There were 74 patients in the HFrEF group and 214 patients in the HFpEF group. All patients successfully underwent LAAC. The CHA2DS2-VASc score and HAS-BLED score of HFrEF group were lower than those of HFpEF group. A total of 288 LAAC devices were implanted. The average diameter of the occluders was 27.2 ± 3.5 mm in the HFrEF group and 26.8 ± 3.3 mm in the HFpEF group, and there was no statistical difference between the two groups (P = 0.470). Also, there was no statistically significant difference in the occurrence of residual shunts between the two groups as detected by TEE after surgery (P = 0.341). LVEF was significantly higher in HFrEF group at 3 days, 3 months and 1 year after operation than before (P < 0.001). At 45-60 days after surgery, we found DRT in 9 patients and there were 4 patients (5.4%) in HFrEF group and 5 patients (2.3%) in HFpEF group, with no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.357). One patient with DRT had stroke. The incidence of stroke was 11.1% in patients with DRT and 0.7% in patients without DRT (P = 0.670). There was one case of postoperative pericardial tamponade, which was improved by pericardiocentesis at 24 h after surgery in the HFpEF group, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (P = 1.000). During a mean follow-up period of 49.7 ± 22.4 months, there were no significant differences in the incidence of stroke, bleeding, DRT and HF exacerbation between the two groups. We found a statistical difference in the improvement of HF between HFrEF group and HFpEF group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: LAAC is safe and effective in AF patients with different types of HF. The improvement of cardiac function after LAAC is more pronounced in HFrEF group than in HFpEF group.
Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Función del Atrio Izquierdo , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Cierre del Apéndice Auricular Izquierdo , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Función Ventricular Izquierda , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Apéndice Atrial/diagnóstico por imagen , Apéndice Atrial/fisiopatología , Apéndice Atrial/cirugía , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilación Atrial/fisiopatología , Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/cirugía , Cierre del Apéndice Auricular Izquierdo/efectos adversos , Recuperación de la Función , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Volumen Sistólico , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Atrial fibrillation poses significant stroke risks, particularly in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Left atrial appendage occlusion has emerged as a crucial strategy for stroke prevention, garnering a Class I recommendation. This paper presents a technical framework for performing robotic left atrial appendage occlusion as an isolated procedure or concurrently with robotic coronary artery bypass grafting using the AtriCure AtriClip Pro2 device.
Asunto(s)
Apéndice Atrial , Fibrilación Atrial , Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Apéndice Atrial/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/métodosRESUMEN
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with an increased risk of stroke and systemic embolism, and the left atrial appendage (LAA) has been identified as a principal source of thromboembolism in these patients. While oral anticoagulation is the current standard of care, LAA closure (LAAC) emerges as an alternative or complementary treatment approach to reduce the risk of stroke or systemic embolism in patients with AF. Moderate-sized randomized clinical studies have provided data for the efficacy and safety of catheter-based LAAC, largely compared with vitamin K antagonists. LAA device iterations, advances in pre- and peri-procedural imaging, and implantation techniques continue to increase the efficacy and safety of LAAC. More data about efficacy and safety of LAAC have been collected, and several randomized clinical trials are currently underway to compare LAAC with best medical care (including non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants) in different clinical settings. Surgical LAAC in patients with AF undergoing cardiac surgery reduced the risk of stroke on background of anticoagulation therapy in the LAAOS III study. In this review, we describe the rapidly evolving field of LAAC and discuss recent clinical data, ongoing studies, open questions, and current limitations of LAAC.
Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes , Fibrilación Atrial , Cierre del Apéndice Auricular Izquierdo , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Apéndice Atrial/cirugía , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Cierre del Apéndice Auricular Izquierdo/instrumentación , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Dispositivo Oclusor Septal , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiologíaRESUMEN
AIMS: Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation and left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) are increasingly performed as individual procedures. Pulsed field ablation (PFA) has significantly reduced procedure duration and may be advantageous for the combined approach. METHODS AND RESULTS: We have launched a programme for simultaneous AF ablation using PFA and LAAO for patients qualifying for both treatments and excluding those with a complex anatomy. We compare procedure duration and fluoroscopy time against individual procedures (either AF ablation or LAAO alone), all performed by the same operators and using consistent technologies. We performed the combined procedure in 10 patients (50% males; median age 70 years) and excluded 2 patients (17%) because of a complex left atrial appendage anatomy. No death, stroke, or major bleeding events, including pericardial effusion, occurred. For single-procedure comparison, 207 AF ablation procedures and 61 LAAO procedures were available. The total median procedure duration was 79 min (range 60-125) for the combined procedure, 71 min (25-241) for individual AF ablation (51 min without and 78 min with 3-dimensional electroanatomic mapping), and 47 min (15-162) for individual LAAO. The respective fluoroscopy times were 21 (15-26), 15 (5-44), and 10 (3-50) min. For the combined procedure, femoral vein access to last PFA application lasted 49 min (34-93) and LAAO added 20 min (15-37). CONCLUSION: Simultaneous PFA-based AF ablation and LAAO in carefully selected patients is feasible and safe and can be executed within a short overall procedure duration.
Asunto(s)
Apéndice Atrial , Fibrilación Atrial , Ablación por Catéter , Estudios de Factibilidad , Tempo Operativo , Humanos , Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Fibrilación Atrial/fisiopatología , Apéndice Atrial/cirugía , Apéndice Atrial/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Ablación por Catéter/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Tiempo , Técnicas Electrofisiológicas Cardíacas , Fluoroscopía , Anciano de 80 o más AñosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Left atrial appendage aneurysm is a rare cardiac mass, with only a few cases reported. There are usually no specific symptoms, and a few patients visit the doctor with symptoms. CASE PRESENTATION: A 20-year-old male presented to our hospital with a "pericardial cyst found by medical evaluation in another hospital for 2 years." Cardiac ultrasound performed at clinics of our hospital suggested a cystic dark area in the left ventricular lateral wall and the anterior lateral wall, consistent with a pericardial cyst and mild mitral regurgitation. After further relevant examinations and ruling out contraindications, an excision of the left atrial appendage aneurysm was performed under general anesthesia and cardiopulmonary bypass with beating-heart. The postoperative pathological results identified that: (left atrial appendage) fibrocystic wall-like tissue with a focal lining of the flat epithelium, consistent with a benign cyst. CONCLUSION: Left atrial appendage aneurysms are rare and insidious. They are usually found by chance during medical evaluations. If the location is not good or the volume is too large, then compression symptoms or arrhythmia, thrombosis and other concomitant symptoms will occur. Surgical resection is presently the only effective radical cure for a left atrial appendage aneurysm.
Asunto(s)
Apéndice Atrial , Aneurisma Cardíaco , Humanos , Masculino , Apéndice Atrial/cirugía , Apéndice Atrial/diagnóstico por imagen , Apéndice Atrial/patología , Aneurisma Cardíaco/cirugía , Aneurisma Cardíaco/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma Cardíaco/diagnóstico , Adulto Joven , Ecocardiografía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/métodosRESUMEN
Among the cardiac outpouchings, left ventricular aneurysms or pseudo-aneurysms that develop secondary to myocardial infarctions are the most common. On the other hand, atrial appendageal and valvular aneurysms are uncommon occurrences. The appendageal aneurysms develop possibly due to congenital dysplasia of atrial pectinate muscles, while valvular aneurysms result from infective endocarditis, mechanical injury or degenerative changes. Despite their unusual locations, they are prone to life-threatening complications. We present our experience of unusual cardiac aneurysms in surgical cardiovascular material.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma Cardíaco , Humanos , Aneurisma Cardíaco/cirugía , Aneurisma Cardíaco/patología , Aneurisma Cardíaco/congénito , Aneurisma Cardíaco/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Apéndice Atrial/patología , Apéndice Atrial/cirugía , Adulto , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos CardíacosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Both atrial fibrillation (AF) and amyloidosis increase stroke risk. We evaluated the best anticoagulation strategy in AF patients with coexistent amyloidosis. METHODS: Consecutive AF patients with concomitant amyloidosis were divided into two groups based on the postablation stroke-prophylaxis approach; group 1: left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) in eligible patients and group 2: oral anticoagulation (OAC). Group 1 patients were further divided into Gr. 1A: LAAO + half-does NOAC (HD-NOAC) for 6 months followed by aspirin 81 mg/day and Gr. 1B: LAAO + HD-NOAC. In group 1 patients, with complete occlusion at the 45-day transesophageal echocardiogram, patients were switched to aspirin, 81 mg/day at 6 months. In case of leak, or dense "smoke" in the left atrium (LA) or enlarged LA, they were placed on long-term half-dose (HD) NOAC. Group 2 patients remained on full-dose NOAC during the whole study period. RESULTS: A total of 92 patients were included in the analysis; group 1: 56 and group 2: 36. After the 45-day TEE, 31 patients from group 1 remained on baby-aspirin and 25 on HD NOAC. At 1-year follow-up, four stroke, one TIA and six device-thrombus were reported in group 1A, compared to none in patients in group 1B (5/31 vs. 0/25, p = .03). No bleeding events were reported in group 1, whereas group 2 had five bleeding events (one subdural hematoma, one retinal hemorrhage, and four GI bleedings). Additionally, one stroke was reported in group 2 that happened during brief discontinuation of OAC. CONCLUSION: In patients with coexistent AF and amyloidosis, half-dose NOAC following LAAO was observed to be the safest stroke-prophylaxis strategy.
Asunto(s)
Amiloidosis , Anticoagulantes , Apéndice Atrial , Fibrilación Atrial , Ablación por Catéter , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico por imagen , Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Masculino , Femenino , Apéndice Atrial/diagnóstico por imagen , Apéndice Atrial/fisiopatología , Apéndice Atrial/cirugía , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Ablación por Catéter/efectos adversos , Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Amiloidosis/complicaciones , Amiloidosis/diagnóstico , Amiloidosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Administración Oral , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Aspirina/administración & dosificación , Aspirina/efectos adversos , Esquema de Medicación , Cardiomiopatías/diagnóstico por imagen , Cardiomiopatías/complicaciones , Cardiomiopatías/diagnósticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Surgical left atrial appendage (LAA) closure concomitant to open-heart surgery prevents thromboembolism in high-risk patients. Nevertheless, high-level evidence does not exist for LAA closure performed in patients with any CHA2DS2-VASc score and preoperative atrial fibrillation or flutter (AF) status-the current trial attempts to provide such evidence. METHODS: The study is designed as a randomized, open-label, blinded outcome assessor, multicenter trial of adult patients undergoing first-time elective open-heart surgery. Patients with and without AF and any CHA2DS2-VASc score will be enrolled. The primary exclusion criteria are planned LAA closure, planned AF ablation, or ongoing endocarditis. Before randomization, a three-step stratification process will sort patients by site, surgery type, and preoperative or expected oral anticoagulation treatment. Patients will undergo balanced randomization (1:1) to LAA closure on top of the planned cardiac surgery or standard care. Block sizes vary from 8 to 16. Neurologists blinded to randomization will adjudicate the primary outcome of stroke, including transient ischemic attack (TIA). The secondary outcomes include a composite outcome of stroke, including TIA, and silent cerebral infarcts, an outcome of ischemic stroke, including TIA, and a composite outcome of stroke and all-cause mortality. LAA closure is expected to provide a 60% relative risk reduction. In total, 1500 patients will be randomized and followed for 2 years. DISCUSSION: The trial is expected to help form future guidelines within surgical LAA closure. This statistical analysis plan ensures transparency of analyses and limits potential reporting biases. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03724318. Registered 26 October 2018, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03724318 . PROTOCOL VERSION: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2023.06.003 .
Asunto(s)
Apéndice Atrial , Fibrilación Atrial , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Apéndice Atrial/cirugía , Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/efectos adversos , Interpretación Estadística de Datos , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/prevención & control , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/etiología , Cierre del Apéndice Auricular Izquierdo , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Left atrial appendage occlusion during cardiac surgery is a therapeutic option for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. The effectiveness and safety of left atrial appendage occlusion have been evaluated in several studies, including the LAAOS-III trial. While these studies have demonstrated efficacy and safety, the long-term economic impact of this surgical technique has not yet been assessed. Here, we aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of left atrial appendage occlusion during cardiac surgery over a long-term time horizon. METHODS: Our study was based on a model representing an hypothetical cohort with the same characteristics as LAAOS-III trial patients. We modelled the incidence of ischemic strokes and systemic embolisms in each intervention arm: "occlusion" and "no-occlusion," using a one-month cycle length with a 20-year time horizon. Regarding occlusion devices, sutures, staples, or an approved surgical occlusion device (AtriClip™-AtriCure, Ohio, USA) could be used. RESULTS: Our model generated an average cost savings of 607 euros per patient and an incremental gain of 0.062 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), resulting an incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) of -9,775/QALY. The scenario analysis in which occlusion was systematically performed using the AtriClip™ device generated an ICUR of 3,952/QALY gained. CONCLUSIONS: In the base-case analysis, the strategy proved to be more effective and less costly, confirming left atrial appendage occlusion during cardiac surgery as an economically dominant strategy. The scenario analysis also appeared cost-effective, although it did not result in cost savings. This study provides a new perspective on the assessment of the cost-effectiveness of these techniques.
Asunto(s)
Apéndice Atrial , Fibrilación Atrial , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Apéndice Atrial/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/economía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/métodos , Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Fibrilación Atrial/economía , Francia , Masculino , Femenino , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Accidente Cerebrovascular/economía , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , AncianoRESUMEN
AIM: To report the clinical outcomes of thoracoscopic left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) with the AtriClip PRO2 device (Atricure Inc, Mason, OH, USA). Stroke risk reduction with LAAO in patients with atrial fibrillation is now well-established. Many surgical and percutaneous techniques have been used, with varying rates of success. The percutaneous devices have had issues with procedural complications and peridevice flow. Thoracoscopic AtriClip offers an epicardial linear closure of the appendage at its ostium. This study sought to evaluate its safety and efficacy in achieving complete LAA closure. METHOD: This is a prospective series of thoracoscopic AtriClip PRO2 as a standalone procedure or a thoracoscopic AtriClip deployed as an adjunct to minimal access cardiac and thoracic surgery. Study ethical approval was granted by the hospital Human Research Ethics Committee. RESULTS: In total, 144 thoracoscopic AtriClip procedures were conducted by a single surgeon from 2017 to 2022, 56 standalone and 88 concomitant. There was no mortality or major morbidities. A 100% success in complete LAA closure was observed, with 87% complete follow-up imaging. For patients that underwent standalone AtriClip after cessation of anticoagulation, no thromboembolic phenomena were seen in the 180 patient-years of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that thoracoscopic placement of AtriClip is safe and effective in achieving consistent and complete LAAO. Future randomised trials will be useful to compare outcomes with percutaneous devices.
Asunto(s)
Apéndice Atrial , Fibrilación Atrial , Toracoscopía , Humanos , Apéndice Atrial/cirugía , Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Fibrilación Atrial/fisiopatología , Masculino , Toracoscopía/métodos , Femenino , Anciano , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Resultado del Tratamiento , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Dispositivo Oclusor Septal , Ecocardiografía Transesofágica/métodos , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
This study evaluated the nationwide associations between concomitant left atrial appendage clip (LAAC) placement during cardiac surgery and postoperative outcomes. We identified 1,260,999 patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting, valve, and aortic surgeries in the 2016 to 2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database and stratified by concomitant LAAC versus no LAAC placement. Patients who underwent surgical ablation were excluded. Mortality and complications were compared during index admissions and for patients readmitted within 30 and 90 days of the index discharge date for unmatched and propensity score-matched groups. Overall, 6.7% (84,293) of patients underwent cardiac surgery and concomitant LAAC placement without surgical ablation. After propensity score matching, the index admission mortality and overall complications were not different in patients with LAAC versus patients without LAAC. LAAC placement was associated with increased any-cause 30-day readmissions (15% vs 13%, p <0.01). In patients with LAAC, within 30 days, there were no differences in mortality (3.9% vs 3.8%, p = 0.60) or overall complications (64% vs 63%, p = 0.20), whereas stroke was lower (5.3% vs 6.5%, p <0.01) and heart failure was higher (35% vs 30%, p <0.01). For patients readmitted within 90 days, similar findings were observed for any-cause readmissions, mortality, overall complications, stroke, and heart failure. In conclusion, concomitant LAAC placement during cardiac surgery was associated with lower early postdischarge incidence of stroke and a favorable overall risk-benefit profile. Given these short-term findings in a real-world population of all patients who underwent cardiac surgery, longer-term studies with more granular data are needed to evaluate the potential benefit of this practice.
Asunto(s)
Apéndice Atrial , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos , Readmisión del Paciente , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Humanos , Apéndice Atrial/cirugía , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Fibrilación Atrial/epidemiología , Puntaje de Propensión , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Instrumentos Quirúrgicos , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/métodos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) has emerged as an alternative to transesophageal echo (TEE) to guide left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). We established a protocol to select patients appropriate for ICE guidance. Patients who underwent LAAO with the Watchman or Watchman FLX device (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Massachusetts) from January 2018 to March 2022 at a large United States center were included. The novel protocol prospectively selected TEE or ICE guidance beginning in January 2020; previous LAAO procedures were retrospectively included. ICE was selected for patients with uninterrupted anticoagulation and appropriate LAA anatomy, renal function, and moderate sedation tolerance. In-hospital outcomes with successful implantation without conversion to TEE guidance, no peridevice leak, and no procedural complications were compared. Composite 1-year outcome included freedom from peridevice leak, device-related thrombus, stroke, and all-cause mortality. A total of 234 patients were included; the mean age was 76.1 ± 8.3 years old, and 42.3% were female. ICE guidance was used for 63 procedures; TEE guidance was used for 171 procedures. For the composite outcome, ICE-guided LAAO was superior to TEE-guided LAAO (risk difference 0.102, 96.8% vs 86.5%, 95% confidence interval 0.003 to 0.203, p = 0.029). In comparison to the TEE-guided group, ICE-guided procedures were shorter (89.1 ± 26.3 vs 99.8 ± 30.0 min, p = 0.0087) with less general anesthesia (26.6% vs 98.8%, p <0.0001). One-year composite adverse outcomes did not differ significantly (80.7% vs 88.9%, p = 0.17). In conclusion, the protocol to select appropriate patients for ICE versus TEE guidance for LAAO is safe and effective. Larger studies are indicated to validate this approach to improve outcomes, shorten procedures, and avoid general anesthesia.
Asunto(s)
Apéndice Atrial , Fibrilación Atrial , Ecocardiografía Transesofágica , Humanos , Apéndice Atrial/diagnóstico por imagen , Apéndice Atrial/cirugía , Femenino , Masculino , Ecocardiografía Transesofágica/métodos , Anciano , Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Protocolos Clínicos , Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos , Selección de Paciente , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Cirugía Asistida por Computador/métodos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Ecocardiografía/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Serum bone morphogenetic protein 10 (BMP10) blood levels are a marker for history of atrial fibrillation (AF) and for major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with AF, including stroke, AF recurrences after catheter ablations, and mortality. The predictive value of BMP10 in patients undergoing cardiac surgery and association with morphologic properties of atrial tissues are unknown. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to study the correlation between BMP10 levels and preoperative clinical traits, occurrence of early and late postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF), and atrial fibrosis in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS: Patients with and without preoperative AF history undergoing first cardiac surgery were included (RACE V, n = 147). Preoperative blood biomarkers were analyzed, left (n = 114) and right (n = 125) atrial appendage biopsy specimens were histologically investigated after WGA staining, and postoperative rhythm was monitored continuously with implantable loop recorders (n = 133, 2.5 years). RESULTS: Adjusted multinomial logistic regression indicated that BMP10 accurately reflected a history of persistent AF (OR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.10-1.40, P = 0.001), similar to NT-pro-BNP. BMP10 levels were associated with increased late POAF90 occurrence after adjustment for age, sex, AF history, and early POAF occurrence (HR: 1.07 [per 0.1 ng/mL increase], 95% CI: 1.00-1.14, P = 0.041). Left atrial endomysial fibrosis (standardized ß = 0.22, P = 0.041) but not overall fibrosis (standardized Β = 0.12, P = 0.261) correlated with circulating BMP10 after adjustment for age, sex, AF history, reduced LVF, and valvular surgery indication. CONCLUSIONS: Increased BMP10 levels were associated with persistent AF history, increased late POAF incidence, and LAA endomysial fibrosis in a diverse sample of patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Apéndice Atrial/cirugía , Fibrilación Atrial/sangre , Fibrilación Atrial/epidemiología , Biomarcadores/sangre , Proteínas Morfogenéticas Óseas , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/efectos adversos , Fibrosis , Atrios Cardíacos/patología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/sangre , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
AIMS: Left atrial appendage electrical isolation (LAAEI) has demonstrated a significant enhancement in the success rate of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Nevertheless, concerns persist about the safety of LAAEI, particularly regarding alterations in left atrial appendage (LAA) flow velocity and the potential risks of thrombus. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of LAAEI, investigating changes in LAA flow velocity in canines. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study comprised a total of 10 canines. The LAAEI procedure used by a 23â mm cryoballoon of the second generation was conducted at least 180â s. Intracardiac ultrasonography (ICE) was employed to quantify the velocity flow of the LAA both prior to and following LAAEI. Following a 3-month period, subsequent evaluations were performed to assess the LAA velocity flow and the potential reconnection. Histopathological examination was conducted. Left atrial appendage electrical isolation was effectively accomplished in all canines, resulting in a 100% acute success rate (10/10). The flow velocity in the LAA showed a notable reduction during LAAEI as compared with the values before the ablation procedure (53.12 ± 5.89 vs. 42.01 ± 9.22â cm/s, P = 0.007). After the follow-up, reconnection was observed in four canines, leading to a success rate of LAAEI of 60% (6/10). The flow velocity in the LAA was consistently lower (53.12 ± 5.89 vs. 44.33 ± 10.49â cm/s, P = 0.006), and no blood clot development was observed. The histopathological study indicated that there was consistent and complete injury to the LAA, affecting all layers of its wall. The injured tissue was subsequently replaced by fibrous tissue. CONCLUSION: The feasibility of using cryoballoon ablation for LAAEI was confirmed in canines, leading to a significant reduction of LAA flow velocity after ablation. Some restoration of LAA flow velocity after ablation may be linked to the passive movement of the LAA and potential reconnecting. However, this conclusion is limited to animal study; more clinical data are needed to further illustrate the safety and accessibility of LAAEI in humans.
Asunto(s)
Apéndice Atrial , Fibrilación Atrial , Criocirugía , Perros , Animales , Apéndice Atrial/cirugía , Criocirugía/métodos , Criocirugía/efectos adversos , Criocirugía/instrumentación , Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Fibrilación Atrial/fisiopatología , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Diseño de Equipo , Velocidad del Flujo Sanguíneo , Resultado del Tratamiento , MasculinoRESUMEN
The left atrial appendage (LAA) occluder is an important medical device for closing the LAA and preventing stroke. The device-related thrombus (DRT) prevents the implantation of the occluder in exerting the desired therapeutic effect, which is primarily caused by the delayed endothelialization of the occluder. Functional coatings are an effective strategy for accelerating the endothelialization of occluders. However, the occluder surface area is particularly large and structurally complex, and the device is subjected to a large shear friction in the sheath during implantation, which poses a significant challenge to the coating. Herein, a hydrogel coating by the in situ UV-triggered polymerization of double-network polyelectrolytes is reported. The findings reveal that the double network and electrostatic interactions between the networks resulted in excellent mechanical properties of the hydrogel coating. The sulfonate and Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) groups in the coating promoted hemocompatibility and endothelial growth of the occluder, respectively. The coating significantly accelerated the endothelialization of the LAA occluder in a canine model is further demonstrated. This study has potential clinical benefits in reducing both the incidence of DRT and the postoperative anticoagulant course for LAA closure.
Asunto(s)
Hidrogeles , Polielectrolitos , Animales , Hidrogeles/química , Polielectrolitos/química , Perros , Apéndice Atrial/cirugía , Rayos Ultravioleta , Materiales Biocompatibles Revestidos/química , Materiales Biocompatibles Revestidos/farmacologíaRESUMEN
Prophylactic left atrial appendage occlusion has been suggested as a means of reducing cardioembolism risk in patients with atrial fibrillation. Its clinical benefits have been discussed together with potential endocrine or hemodynamic adverse effects, with conflicting conclusions. We aimed to provide a thorough overview of the current literature and a recommendation for daily clinical decision-making. A comprehensive Medline search through PubMed was conducted to search for relevant articles, which were further filtered using the title and abstract. Sixty-five articles were selected as relevant to the topic. Concomitant left atrial appendage occlusion during cardiac surgery for other reasons is effective in terms of thromboembolism risk reduction in patients with a history of atrial fibrillation and higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores. Surgical occlusion is safe, and epicardial closure techniques are preferred. Thoracoscopic and transcatheter techniques are also feasible, and the individual treatment choice must be tailored to the patient. The concerns about endocrine imbalance or risk of heart failure after occlusion are not supported by evidence. Current evidence is conflicting with regard to hemodynamic consequences of appendage occlusion.
Asunto(s)
Apéndice Atrial , Fibrilación Atrial , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Tromboembolia , Humanos , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Apéndice Atrial/cirugía , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicaciones , Tromboembolia/prevención & control , Tromboembolia/inducido químicamente , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Advances in imaging have led to procedural optimization of left atrial appendage closure (LAAC). Contrast-free approaches, guided merely by echocardiography, have been established, however data on this topic remains scarce. In this analysis, we assessed contrast-free procedural results with the LAMBRE LAAC device. METHODS: The multicenter retrospective BoBoMa (Bonn/Bordeaux/Mainz)-Registry included a total of 118 patients that underwent LAAC with LAMBRE devices omitting contrast-dye. Baseline and echocardiographic characteristics as well as intra- and postprocedural complications and outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: Patients were at a mean age of 77.5 ± 7.5 years with high thromboembolic and bleeding risk (CHADS-VASc-score 4.6 ± 1.4, HAS-BLED-score 3.7 ± 1.0, respectively). Renal function was impaired with a mean glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of 50 ± 22 ml/min. Mean procedural time was 47.2 ± 37.5 minutes with a mean radiation dose of 4.75 ± 5.25 Gy*cm2. Device success, defined as proper deployment in a correct position, was achieved in 97.5% (115/118) of cases with repositioning of the occluder in 7.6% (9/118) and resizing in 3.4% (4/118) of cases. No relevant peri-device leakage (>3 mm) was observed with 42% of occluders being implanted in an ostial position. Periprocedural complications occurred in 6.8% (8/118) of cases, including two cases of device embolization and one case of clinically-relevant pericardial effusion requiring surgical intervention. Other complications included pericardial effusion (2.5%, 3/118) and vascular access site complications (1.7%, 2/118). CONCLUSION: Echocardiography-guided contrast-free LAAC using the LAMBRE device is safe and feasible. Further prospective studies including the direct comparison of devices as well as imaging techniques are warranted in contrast-free LAAC.
Asunto(s)
Apéndice Atrial , Fibrilación Atrial , Dispositivo Oclusor Septal , Humanos , Apéndice Atrial/cirugía , Apéndice Atrial/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico por imagen , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Sistema de Registros , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ecocardiografía Transesofágica/métodos , Medios de Contraste/administración & dosificación , Estudios de SeguimientoRESUMEN
Oral anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation are the standard approach to prevent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. However, oral anticoagulant therapy carries the risk of cerebral infarction recurrence, not to mention hemorrhagic complications, even under appropriate drug therapy. Surgical treatments targeting the left atrial appendage include left atrial appendage closure( LAAO) and left atrial appendage resection (LAAR). Our hospital uses AtriClip (approved and available in Japan since 2018) as a device for LAAO, and we investigated the early and long-term results of LAAO using AtriClip in our hospital. As a result, stable early to long-term results were expected for left atrial appendage closure using AtriClip device, suggesting that it may be an option that can be considered as a method for preventing stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. But further investigation is required in the future.
Asunto(s)
Apéndice Atrial , Fibrilación Atrial , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Cierre del Apéndice Auricular Izquierdo , Apéndice Atrial/cirugía , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Instrumentos Quirúrgicos/efectos adversos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Off-pump totally-endoscopic surgery for atrial fibrillation is reported. This procedure is also called the Wolf-Ohtsuka procedure or totally thoracoscopic maze (TT-maze) surgery. It is a minimally invasive left atrial appendage management and surgical ablation. The wound is limited to that required for port placement, and the patient recovers quickly. Advantages over WATCHMAN include the that it can be applied regardless of the size of the left atrial appendage, can be performed even if there is a thrombus at the tip of the left atrial appendage, and no wound or device comes on the endocardial side. Advantages over catheter ablation is the potential for embolism prevention by simultaneously performing ablation and the left atrial appendage management. The tips and techniques for this procedure are also described here.
Asunto(s)
Apéndice Atrial , Fibrilación Atrial , Ablación por Catéter , Humanos , Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Apéndice Atrial/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Toracoscopía/métodos , Ablación por Catéter/métodosRESUMEN
We retrospectively study the outcome of left atrial appendage (LAA) preserving maze procedure, focus on thrombus formation in left atrium( LA), postoperative stroke, and LA function. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied 131 patients (mean age, 68.2y;77 men and 54 women) who underwent maze procedure for atrial fibrillation( Af) between 2008 and 2020. Full maze was performed for 116 patients with long-standing persistent Af or persistent Af. Pulmonary vein isolation alone was performed for 15 patients with paroxysmal Af. The mean follow-up period was 2.9( 10.1-0.4) years. RESULTS: In perioperative results, there were no death, cerebral infarction, and reoperation in this series. At discharge, 1 year, 3 years, 5 years, and 10 years after the surgery, sinus rhythm was maintained in 92%, 87%, 83%, 77%. Pacemaker was implanted in 8( early 3, late 5) patients. Despite adequate anticoagulant therapy, one patient developed cerebral infarction a month postoperatively. In other patients, there was no cerebral infarction in short-term nor long-term. CONCLUSIONS: The LAA preserving maze procedure was not a risk factor of cerebral infarction under appropriate medication. However, close follow-up is essential.