Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 750
Filtrar
1.
J Cardiothorac Surg ; 19(1): 286, 2024 May 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38734628

RESUMEN

Acute type A aortic dissection is a severe cardiovascular disease characterized by rapid onset and high mortality. Traditionally, urgent open aortic repair is performed after admission to prevent aortic rupture and death. However, when combined with malperfusion syndrome, the low perfusion of the superior mesenteric artery can further lead to intestinal necrosis, significantly impacting the surgery's prognosis and potentially resulting in adverse consequences, bringing. This presents great significant challenges in treatment. Based on recent domestic and international research literature, this paper reviews the mechanism, current treatment approaches, and selection of surgical methods for poor organ perfusion caused by acute type A aortic dissection. The literature review findings suggest that central aortic repair can be employed for the treatment of acute type A aortic dissection with inadequate perfusion of the superior mesenteric artery. The superior mesenteric artery can be windowed and (/or) stented, followed by delayed aortic repair. Priority should be given to revascularization of the superior mesenteric artery, followed by central aortic repair. During central aortic repair, direct blood perfusion should be performed on the distal true lumen of the superior mesenteric artery, leading to resulting in favorable therapeutic outcomes. The research results indicate that even after surgical aortic repair, intestinal ischemic necrosis may still occur. In such cases, prompt laparotomy and necessary necrotic bowel resection are crucial for saving the patient's life.


Asunto(s)
Disección Aórtica , Arteria Mesentérica Superior , Necrosis , Humanos , Disección Aórtica/cirugía , Disección Aórtica/complicaciones , Arteria Mesentérica Superior/cirugía , Intestinos/irrigación sanguínea , Intestinos/cirugía , Isquemia Mesentérica/cirugía , Isquemia/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta/complicaciones , Enfermedad Aguda
3.
World J Surg Oncol ; 22(1): 141, 2024 May 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38802849

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: SMA-first approach in pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) has been widely applied in open surgery as well as laparoscopy. Finding the superior mesenteric artery (SMA), inferior pancreatoduodenal artery (IPDA), first jejunal artery (J1A) has become a great challenge in laparoscopic PD (LPD). Meanwhile, exposing the midde colic artery (MCA) might be a feasible approach to determine SMA, IPDA, and J1A. Our study aims to find the anatomical correlation between MCA and SMA, IPDA, J1A, especially in SMA-first approach LPD from the left. METHODS: Uncontrolled clinical trial with 33 patients undergoing LPD had preoperative contrast abdominal CT scan to analyze the anatomical relevance between MCA and SMA, J1A, IPDA. The operation was performed starting with exposing MCA in advance to find SMA, J1A and IPDA. The data was analyzed by SPSS 25.0. RESULTS: 90.9% of MCA started at 12-3 o'clock from SMA, the mean distance from the SMA root to the MCA and J1A was 56.4 mm and 37.4 mm, respectively. The distance between SMA and J1A was 19 mm. 72.7% J1A started at 9-12 o'clock, 69.7% J1A and IPDA had a common trunk. 78.8% IPDA started at 3-6 o'clock. 100% of the cases had J1A controlled intraoperatively, 81.8% for IPDA when approached from the left, 3% had MCA injury. The mean time to approach from the left was 98 min, median blood loss was 100 ml. CONCLUSION: Exposing MCA first helps determine SMA, J1A and IPDA safely, efficiently and faciliates SMA-first approach LPD from the left and complete dissection of the mesopancreas and lymph nodes.


Asunto(s)
Estudios de Factibilidad , Laparoscopía , Arteria Mesentérica Superior , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Pancreaticoduodenectomía , Humanos , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/métodos , Arteria Mesentérica Superior/cirugía , Arteria Mesentérica Superior/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Masculino , Laparoscopía/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Anciano , Adulto , Pronóstico , Estudios de Seguimiento , Puntos Anatómicos de Referencia , Colon/cirugía , Colon/irrigación sanguínea , Colon/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos
4.
J Cardiothorac Surg ; 19(1): 235, 2024 Apr 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38627835

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The goals of this study were to investigate the treatment outcomes of acute thromboembolic occlusion of the superior mesenteric artery (ATOS) and identify prognostic factors after treatment. METHODS: The clinical data of 62 patients with ATOS between 2013 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were stratified by the treatment strategy, complications and mortality were compared in different group. RESULTS: Sixty-two consecutive patients were identified with ATOS. The median patient age was 69 years (interquartile range 58-79 years). Endovascular therapy was initiated in 21 patients, and 4 patients received conservative treatment. Open surgery was performed first in the remaining 37 patients. The technical success rates of the endovascular first group and open surgery group were 90.5% and 97.3%, respectively. One patient in the conservative treatment group had progression of ischemia to extensive bowel necrosis. There was no difference in 30-day mortality between these groups. Predictors of 30-day mortality included initial neutrophil count > 12* 103/dL, age over 60 years old and history of chronic renal insufficiency. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular treatment or conservative treatment may be adopted in selected patients who do not exhibit signs and symptoms of bowel necrosis, and close monitoring for bowel necrosis is important. The increase in preoperative neutrophil count, age over 60 years old and history of chronic renal insufficiency were poor prognostic factors.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Endovasculares , Isquemia Mesentérica , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica , Tromboembolia , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Arteria Mesentérica Superior/cirugía , Isquemia Mesentérica/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Tromboembolia/cirugía , Tromboembolia/complicaciones , Resultado del Tratamiento , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/complicaciones , Necrosis , Stents
5.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 103(17): e37978, 2024 Apr 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38669393

RESUMEN

RATIONALE: Visceral artery aneurysm is a rare and potentially fatal vascular condition that typically affects the superior mesenteric or inferior mesenteric arteries, the splenic, hepatic, and celiac arteries, as well as their branches. Visceral artery aneurysms can usually be treated using endovascular intervention, open surgery, or percutaneous thrombin injection. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 9-year-old girl was admitted to our trauma center with abdominal and bilateral leg pain after a car accident involving a head-on collision. DIAGNOSIS: Abdominal computed tomography (CT) showed bowel herniation through a muscle defect in the left lateral abdominal wall. There was a small amount of fluid around the liver and spleen, mild thickening of the small bowel wall, and infiltration in the small bowel mesentery, indicating the possibility of small bowel injury. INTERVENTIONS: Emergent exploratory laparotomy was performed. After resection of the ischemic parts of the terminal ileum and sigmoid colon, intestinal continuity was reestablished. Primary repair was performed on a traumatic left lateral abdominal wall hernia. She recovered well postoperatively without any complications. A follow-up abdominal CT scan after 2 months showed a pseudoaneurysm of the ileal branch of the superior mesenteric artery. Despite the absence of any gastrointestinal symptoms, the pseudoaneurysm was treated by endovascular intervention using numerous coils because of the significant risk of delayed rupture or massive bleeding. OUTCOMES: Follow-up abdominal CT scan after 6 months showed complete occlusion and resorption of the pseudoaneurysm. LESSONS: Although it is technically challenging, endovascular coil embolization may be a feasible technique in children with traumatic visceral artery pseudoaneurysms without complications.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma Falso , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Arteria Mesentérica Superior , Humanos , Femenino , Niño , Aneurisma Falso/etiología , Aneurisma Falso/terapia , Aneurisma Falso/cirugía , Arteria Mesentérica Superior/lesiones , Arteria Mesentérica Superior/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Mesentérica Superior/cirugía , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Íleon/irrigación sanguínea , Accidentes de Tránsito , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Traumatismos Abdominales/complicaciones , Embolización Terapéutica/métodos
6.
Updates Surg ; 76(3): 933-941, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38526696

RESUMEN

Colorectal cancer, the third most common cancer worldwide, affects 40-45% of patients on the right side. Surgery, especially minimally invasive methods such as laparoscopic and robotic procedures, is the preferred treatment. However, these techniques present technical complications. The anatomical complexity and variations in vessel branching patterns pose challenges, particularly for less experienced surgeons. The CoDIG 2 is a nationwide observational study involving 76 specialized Italian general surgery departments focused on colorectal surgery. The centres were directed to maintain their standard surgical and clinical practices. The aim of this study was to analyse the intraoperative vascular anatomy of Italian patients who underwent laparoscopic right colectomy and explore the ligature techniques used by Italian surgeons. Surgeons reported information about vascularization of the right colon for 616 patients and about surgical anatomy of RCA for 368 patients. Fifty-three patients (10.8%) showed no RCA intraoperatively. The right colic artery (RCA) was categorized according to the Yada classification (types 1-4) during evaluation, and intraoperative assessments revealed that Yada type 1 was the most common type (55.2%), while radiologic evaluations revealed a higher prevalence of type 2. Furthermore, compared with the superior mesenteric vein (SMV), the RCA is more often located anteriorly according to intraoperative and contrast-enhanced CT examination; 59.9% were found in the anterior position during intraoperative examination, while 40.1% were found in the same position on preoperative contrast-enhanced CT. Vascularization of the right colon, including missing branches, additional branches, shared trunks, and retro-superior courses of the mesenteric vein, exhibited notable variations. To understand vascular variations, a preoperative radiological study is necessary; although there was no concordance between the intraoperative and radiological evaluations, this is a limitation of preinterventional radiological evaluation (PII) because it is always needed for oncological staging. This approach is especially critical for inexperienced surgeons to avoid potential complications, such as problematic bleeding.


Asunto(s)
Colectomía , Laparoscopía , Arteria Mesentérica Superior , Humanos , Colectomía/métodos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Italia/epidemiología , Femenino , Masculino , Arteria Mesentérica Superior/anatomía & histología , Arteria Mesentérica Superior/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Mesentérica Superior/cirugía , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Bases de Datos Factuales , Colon/cirugía , Colon/irrigación sanguínea , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Variación Anatómica , Periodo Intraoperatorio
7.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 31(6): 4112, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38509271

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Notable improvements in pancreatic cancer surgery have been due to utilization of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA)-first approach1 and triangle operation (clearance of triangle tissue between origin of SMA and celiac artery).2 The SMA-first approach was originally defined to assess resectability before taking the irreversible surgical steps. However, in the present era, resectability is judged by the preoperative radiology, and the benefit of the SMA-first approach is by improving the R0 resection rate and reducing blood loss. The basic principle is to identify the SMA at its origin and in the distal part, to guide the plane of uncinate dissection. This video demonstrates the combination of the posterior and right medial SMA-first approach along with triangle clearance during robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD). METHODS: The technique consisted of early dissection of SMA from the posterior aspect, by performing a Kocher maneuver using the 'posterior SMA-first approach'. The origin of the celiac artery, along with the SMA, was defined early in the surgery. During uncinate process dissection, the 'right/medial uncinate approach' was used to approach the SMA. 'Level 3 systematic mesopancreatic dissection' was performed along the SMA,3 culminating in the 'triangle operation'.2 RESULTS: The procedure was performed within 600 min, with a blood loss of 150 mL and no intraoperative or postoperative complications. The final histopathology report showed a moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma (pT2, pN2), with all resection margins free. CONCLUSION: The standardized technique of the SMA-first approach and triangle clearance during RPD is demonstrated in the video. Prospective studies should further evaluate the benefits of this procedure.


Asunto(s)
Arteria Mesentérica Superior , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Pancreaticoduodenectomía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Humanos , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Arteria Mesentérica Superior/cirugía , Arteria Celíaca/cirugía , Pronóstico
8.
Langenbecks Arch Surg ; 409(1): 79, 2024 Mar 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38427063

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Although venous drainage of the jejunal loop may be maintained after sacrifice of jejunal vein tributaries during pancreatoduodenectomy, risk of severe jejunal mesenteric congestion following division of these tributaries can be difficult to predict. This study considered how best to predict safety of jejunal vein tributary dissection. METHODS: Preoperative imaging findings and results of intraoperative clamp tests of jejunal vein tributaries during pancreatoduodenectomy were analyzed in 121 patients with hepatobiliary and pancreatic disease to determine whether this information adequately predicted safety of resecting superior mesenteric vein branches. RESULTS: Jejunal vein tributaries caudal to the inferior border of the pancreatic uncinate process tended to be fewer when tributaries cranial to this landmark were more numerous. Tributaries cranial to the border drained a relatively wide expanse of jejunal artery territory in the jejunal mesentery. The territory of jejunal tributaries cranial to the inferior border of the pancreas did not vary according to course of the first jejunal vein branch relative to the superior mesenteric artery. One patient among 30 (3%) who underwent intraoperative clamp tests of tributaries cranial to the border showed severe congestion in relation to a venous tributary coursing ventrally to the superior mesenteric artery. CONCLUSION: Jejunal venous tributaries drained an extensive portion of jejunal arterial territory, but tributaries located cranially to the inferior border of the pancreas could be sacrificed without congestion in nearly all patients. Intraoperative clamp testing of these tributaries can identify patients whose jejunal veins must be preserved to avoid congestion.


Asunto(s)
Venas Mesentéricas , Pancreaticoduodenectomía , Humanos , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/efectos adversos , Venas Mesentéricas/cirugía , Páncreas/cirugía , Vena Porta/cirugía , Arteria Mesentérica Superior/cirugía
9.
BMJ Case Rep ; 17(2)2024 Feb 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38383132

RESUMEN

Superior mesenteric artery syndrome (SMAS) is a rare and potentially life-threatening cause of small bowel obstruction in which the superior mesenteric artery impinges on the third portion of the duodenum. SMAS is typically encountered in patients with low body fat and a history of rapid weight loss and is often diagnosed as a chronic or subacute condition. Here, we describe a case of a healthy adolescent boy without typical SMAS prodromal symptoms presenting with a severe, hyperacute proximal small bowel obstruction due to SMAS. Complications arising from massive gastric and duodenal distension, including gastric, pancreatic and renal ischaemia, necessitated emergent surgical intervention consisting of the duodenojejunostomy bypass with partial gastric resection. The patient recovered without significant lasting consequences.


Asunto(s)
Obstrucción Intestinal , Enfermedades Renales , Síndrome de la Arteria Mesentérica Superior , Masculino , Adolescente , Humanos , Síndrome de la Arteria Mesentérica Superior/complicaciones , Síndrome de la Arteria Mesentérica Superior/diagnóstico , Síndrome de la Arteria Mesentérica Superior/cirugía , Duodeno/cirugía , Arteria Mesentérica Superior/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Mesentérica Superior/cirugía , Estómago , Obstrucción Intestinal/complicaciones , Isquemia/cirugía , Isquemia/complicaciones , Enfermedades Renales/complicaciones
10.
J Cardiothorac Surg ; 19(1): 11, 2024 Jan 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38243244

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The celiacomesenteric trunk (CMT) is a common duct of the celiac artery (CA) and the superior mesenteric artery originating from the aorta, which is an uncommon anatomical variant of visceral artery circulation. Because of the variety of visceral circulation in those with CMT, the visceral circulation associated with each branch should be evaluated prior to surgical treatment of visceral artery aneurysm in the CMT. CASE PRESENTATION: A 64-year-old woman was diagnosed with a CA aneurysm in the CMT. Aneurysmectomy of the aneurysm was performed successfully. On preoperative selective visceral angiography, the CA was seen to bifurcate into the common hepatic and splenic artery. The left gastric artery was directly isolated from the aorta and perfused to the common hepatic and splenic artery through collateral circulation. These findings showed that celiac artery embolization is anatomically feasible, even in cases of celiac artery aneurysm rupture. CONCLUSIONS: Selective visceral angiography can contribute to surgical strategy planning for CA aneurysm with CMT.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma , Arteria Celíaca , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Arteria Celíaca/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Celíaca/cirugía , Aneurisma/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma/cirugía , Aneurisma/etiología , Arteria Mesentérica Superior/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Mesentérica Superior/cirugía , Radiografía , Angiografía
11.
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi ; 62(3): 235-241, 2024 Mar 01.
Artículo en Chino | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38291640

RESUMEN

Objective: To explore the surgical strategies and clinical efficacy for aortic dissection combined with refractory superior mesenteric artery (SMA) ischemia. Methods: This is a retrospective case series study. Clinical data of 24 patients with aortic dissection and refractory SMA ischemia admitted to the Department of Vascular Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University from August 2010 to August 2020 were retrospectively collected. Of the 24 patients, 21 were males and 3 were females, with an age of (50.3±9.9) years (range: 44 to 72 years).Among them, 9 cases were Stanford type A aortic dissection, and 15 cases were type B. All patients underwent CT angiography upon admission, and based on imaging characteristics, they were classified into three types. Type Ⅰ: severe stenosis/occlusion of the SMA true lumen only; Type Ⅱ: stenosis of the true lumens in the descending aorta and SMA (isolated type); Type Ⅲ: stenosis of the true lumens in the thoracoabdominal aorta and SMA (continuation type). Surgical procedures, complications, mortality, and reintervention rates were recorded. Results: Among the 24 patients, 17 (70.8%) were classified as Type Ⅰ, 4 (16.7%) as Type Ⅱ, and 3 (12.5%) as Type Ⅲ. Fourteen cases of Type Ⅰ underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair combined with SMA stent implantation. Additionally, 3 Type Ⅰ and 1 Type Ⅱ patients underwent only SMA reconstruction (with one case of chronic TAAD treated with iliac artery-SMA bypass surgery). Moreover, 3 Type Ⅱ and 3 Type Ⅲ patients underwent descending aorta combined with SMA stent implantation. There were 5 patients (20.8%) who underwent small bowel resection, either in the same sitting or in a staged procedure. During hospitalization, 4 patients died, resulting in a mortality rate of 16.7%. Among these cases, two patients succumbed to severe intestinal ischemia resulting in multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. The follow-up duration was (46±9) months (range: 13 to 72 months). During the follow-up, 2 patients died, unrelated to intestinal ischemia. The 5-year freedom from reintervention survival rate was 86.1%, and the 5-year cumulative survival rate was 82.6%. Conclusions: Patients with aortic dissection and refractory SMA ischemia have a high perioperative mortality. However, implementing appropriate surgical strategies according to different clinical scenarios can reduce mortality and alleviate intestinal ischemia.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica , Disección Aórtica , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Isquemia Mesentérica , Masculino , Femenino , Humanos , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Constricción Patológica/complicaciones , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Disección Aórtica/cirugía , Isquemia Mesentérica/etiología , Arteria Mesentérica Superior/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Stents/efectos adversos , Isquemia/cirugía , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos
13.
Vasc Endovascular Surg ; 58(4): 419-425, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37975249

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Bypass surgery in severe aorto-iliac calcifications is a complex procedure. Aortic clamping can be highly risky and endovascular approach can be unsuccessful. We report our experience describing three cases of chronic mesenteric ischemia. In all three cases the preoperative computed tomography angiography revealed an ostial occlusion of the celiac trunk and of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA), a coral reef abdominal aorta, and severe calcification of the iliac arteries. An antegrade aorto-mesenteric bypass using a hybrid clampless anastomosis on the supraceliac aorta was performed. RESULTS: The procedures were performed via laparotomy. We carried out the exposure of the anterior supraceliac aorta limited to the zone without major calcifications; then we performed a side-to-end media-adventitial anastomosis between the supraceliac aorta and a Dacron graft 7 mm without any arteriotomy or clamping. The proximal graft and the aortic anastomosis site were punctured using a 18 G needle. An introducer was then positioned over a wire through the prosthetic graft and pushed into the aorta. Balloon expandable covered stenting to open and stabilize the anastomosis site was performed. Finally, the graft was tunneled to the SMA, and an end-to-side anastomosis was performed. The postoperative courses were uneventful, and the patients were promptly discharged. The follow-up, which in the first case is 4 years, showed the complete patency of the graft in each of the cases treated. CONCLUSIONS: The hybrid clampless anastomosis appears to be safe and useful in cases of severe aortic calcification.


Asunto(s)
Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Arteria Mesentérica Superior , Humanos , Arteria Mesentérica Superior/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Mesentérica Superior/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Anastomosis Quirúrgica
14.
Vasc Endovascular Surg ; 58(3): 338-342, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37908141

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Aneurysms of the middle colic artery (MCAA) and its branches are exceedingly rare accounting for <3% of total visceral aneurysms. Very few MCAA cases have been reported in the literature with only three cases accounting for a diameter >4 cm. METHOD: We describe the successful open repair with ligation of a 4.2 cm asymptomatic MCAA in a female patient through the gastrohepatic ligament taking meticulous caution to avoid injury of the pancreas. The postoperative period was uneventful and the patient was discharged from the hospital on the fifth postoperative day. At 1 month follow-up the postoperative computed tomographic angiography documented complete exclusion of the MCAA and absence of contrast agent in the sac both in the arterial and the venous phase. CONCLUSION: While the endovascular treatment is the first-line option for visceral aneurysms, the open approach is still reserved for certain cases of hostile anatomy, challenging location and large size. Our case highlights the irreplaceable role of open surgery and underlines the collaboration between surgical specialties.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Humanos , Femenino , Arteria Mesentérica Inferior/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Aneurisma/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma/cirugía , Arteria Mesentérica Superior/cirugía
15.
Mil Med ; 189(3-4): e923-e926, 2024 Feb 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37831902

RESUMEN

Aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms of the visceral arteries are a rare pathology with a prevalence of 0.1-2% in the general population, most common in men. Despite low prevalence, visceral aneurysms pose a significant threat to the patient's health and life; a ruptured superior mesenteric branch aneurysm carries mortality rates of 10-25% and up to 30-90%. This article presents a case of a 50-year-old former active duty soldier and veteran of a military combat mission in Afghanistan, during which he sustained a traumatic injury resulting from a mine explosion under a vehicle. After completing the mission and returning home, the patient developed abdominal pain. The diagnosis made in the general surgery department of the district hospital was upper gastrointestinal obstruction and aneurysmal rupture of the superior mesenteric branch with inflammatory infiltration of the pancreatic-intestinal area. The patient underwent emergency gastrointestinal anastomosis and Braun enteroenterostomy. The aneurysm was not resected. One month later, the patient underwent a follow-up abdominal angiotomography, which revealed an approximately 20-mm aneurysm of a branch of the superior mesenteric artery and celiac artery subocclusion (Dunbar syndrome) with extensive collateral circulation. A diagnosis of pseudoaneurysm/traumatic aneurysm was made, and the patient was referred to a vascular surgery center for endovascular treatment. Following CT angiography, a decision was made to perform a two-stage endovascular repair. The first stage was a bridge therapy aimed to release celiac artery subocclusion with a stent; after 3 weeks, pseudoaneurysm embolization was performed. The decision to use two-stage endovascular treatment was attributable to the risk of gastrointestinal ischemia that might result from intraoperative technical difficulties and complications, coil dislocation, and thrombosis of the superior mesenteric artery or its branch; the coexisting subocclusion of the celiac artery was also considered. The patient was discharged in good condition and returned to normal everyday activities. He also continued follow-up appointments with a vascular surgeon. An angiotomography performed at 1 year of endovascular treatment confirmed good effects of the embolization procedure and coagulation of the aneurysm. Visceral aneurysms are a rare vascular pathology but are associated with significant morbidity and mortality rates. The incidence of ruptured aneurysms is probably underestimated as some patients may be operated on for acute abdominal symptoms, e.g., bowel obstruction.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma Falso , Aneurisma , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Personal Militar , Masculino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Aneurisma Falso/etiología , Aneurisma Falso/cirugía , Arteria Mesentérica Superior/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Aneurisma/cirugía
17.
BMC Surg ; 23(1): 365, 2023 Dec 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38049799

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: There are only a few case reports of laparoscopic lateral duodenojejunostomy (LLDJ) in children with Wilkie's syndrome, also known as superior mesenteric artery compression syndrome (SMAS). We aimed to describe our laparoscopic technique and evaluate its outcomes for SMAS in children. METHODS: From January 2013 to May 2021, SMAS children who received LLDJ were included. The procedure was carried out utilizing the four-trocar technique. The elevation of the transverse colon allows good exposure of the dilated and bulging second and third sections of the duodenum. Using a linear stapler, we established a lateral anastomosis connecting the proximal jejunum with the third part of the duodenum. Following that, a running suture was used to intracorporeally close the common enterotomy. Clinical data on patients was collected for analysis. The demographics, diagnostic findings, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: We retrospectively analyzed 9 SMAS patients (6 females and 3 males) who underwent LLDJ, aged between 7 and 17 years old. The mean operative time was 118.4 ± 16.5 min and the mean estimated blood loss was 5.6 ± 1.4 ml. There were no conversion, intraoperative complications or immediate postoperative complications. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 6.8 ± 1.9 days and the mean follow-up time was 5.4 ± 3.0 years. During follow-up, seven patients (77.8%) experienced complete recovery of symptoms prior to surgery. One patient (11.1%) still had mild vomiting, which resolved with medication. Another patient (11.1%) developed psychological-induced nausea, which significantly improved after treatment with education, training and diet management. CONCLUSIONS: LLDJ represents a feasible and safe treatment option for SMAS in well-selected children. Further evaluation with more cases and case-control studies is required for the real benefits.


Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Síndrome de la Arteria Mesentérica Superior , Masculino , Femenino , Humanos , Niño , Adolescente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Arteria Mesentérica Superior/cirugía , Síndrome de la Arteria Mesentérica Superior/cirugía , Síndrome de la Arteria Mesentérica Superior/diagnóstico , Laparoscopía/métodos , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/métodos
18.
Langenbecks Arch Surg ; 408(1): 422, 2023 Nov 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37910224

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Various approaches have been reported for the resection of the nervous and lymphatic tissues around the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) during pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic cancer. We developed a new procedure for circumferential lymph node dissection around the SMA to minimize local recurrence. METHODS: We included 24 patients who underwent PD with circumferential lymph node dissection around the SMA (circumferential dissection) and 94 patients who underwent classical mesopancreatic dissection (classical dissection) between 2019 and 2021. The technical details of this new method are described in the figures and videos, and the clinical characteristics and outcomes of this technique were compared with those of classical dissection. RESULTS: The median follow-up durations in the circumferential and classical dissection groups were 39 and 36 months, respectively. The patients' characteristics, including tumor resectability, preoperative and adjuvant chemotherapy rates, postoperative complication rates, and tumor stage, were similar between the two groups. No differences were observed in recurrence-free survival and overall survival between the two groups; however, the classical dissection group tended to have more local recurrences than the circumferential dissection group (8.3% vs. 33.3%, P = 0.168). Although no case of nodular-type recurrence after circumferential dissection was observed, 61.1% of local recurrences after classical dissection were of the nodular-type, and 36.4% were located on the left side of the SMA. CONCLUSIONS: Performing circumferential lymph node dissection around the SMA during PD can be conducted safely with minimal risks of local recurrence and may enhance the completeness of local resection.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Pancreaticoduodenectomía , Humanos , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/métodos , Arteria Mesentérica Superior/cirugía , Arteria Mesentérica Superior/patología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/métodos
20.
Surg Endosc ; 37(12): 9326-9338, 2023 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37891371

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The use of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) in pancreatic head cancer remains controversial, and an appropriate surgical approach can help improve perioperative safety and oncological outcomes. This study aimed to assess the short-term outcomes and long-term survival of the superior mesenteric artery first (SMA-first) approach in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) undergoing LPD. METHODS: The data of 91 consecutive PDAC patients who underwent LPD from June 2014 to June 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups, the modified SMA-first approach group, using a combined posterior and anterior approach, and the conventional approach group. Perioperative outcomes, pathologic results, and overall survival (OS) were compared between groups, and propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis was performed. RESULTS: The number of lymph nodes harvested was greater in the SMA-first approach group (19 vs. 15, P = 0.021), as did the results in the matched cohort (21 vs. 15, P = 0.046). No significant difference was observed in the R0 resection rate (93.3% vs. 82.6%, P = 0.197), but the involvement of the SMA margin was indeed lower in the SMA-first approach group (0 vs. 13%). There were no obvious variances between the two groups in terms of intraoperative bleeding, operative time, overall and major postoperative complication rates, and mortality in either the original cohort or matched cohort. The median OS was 21.8 months in the SMA-first group, whereas it was 19.8 months in the conventional group (P = 0.900). Survival also did not differ in the matched cohort (P = 0.558). TNM stage, resection margin, overall complications, and adjuvant therapy were independent risk factors affecting OS. CONCLUSION: The modified SMA-first approach is safe and feasible for PDAC patients undergoing LPD. It had a slight advantage in specimen quality, but OS was not significantly prolonged.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático , Laparoscopía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/métodos , Arteria Mesentérica Superior/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/cirugía , Laparoscopía/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA