Lactylation: the novel histone modification influence on gene expression, protein function, and disease.

Lactic acid, traditionally considered as a metabolic waste product arising from glycolysis, has undergone a resurgence in scientific interest since the discovery of the Warburg effect in tumor cells. Numerous studies have proved that lactic acid could promote angiogenesis and impair the function of immune cells within tumor microenvironments. Nevertheless, the precise molecular mechanisms governing these biological functions remain inadequately understood. Recently, lactic acid has been found to induce a posttranslational modification, lactylation, that may offer insight into lactic acid's non-metabolic functions. Notably, the posttranslational modification of proteins by lactylation has emerged as a crucial mechanism by which lactate regulates cellular processes. This article provides an overview of the discovery of lactate acidification, outlines the potential "writers" and "erasers" responsible for protein lactylation, presents an overview of protein lactylation patterns across different organisms, and discusses the diverse physiological roles of lactylation. Besides, the article highlights the latest research progress concerning the regulatory functions of protein lactylation in pathological processes and underscores its scientific significance for future investigations.

Histone modification-linked prognostic model for ovarian cancer reveals LBX2 as a novel growth promoter.

Ovarian cancer (OC) is a deadly disease with limited treatment options and poor overall survival rates. This study aimed to investigate the role of histone modification-related genes in predicting the prognosis of OC patients. Transcriptome data from multiple cohorts, including bulk RNA-Seq data and single-cell scRNA-Seq data, were collected. Gene set enrichment analysis was used to identify enriched gene sets in the histone modification pathway. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between histone modification-high and histone modification-low groups were identified using Lasso regression. A prognostic model was constructed using five selected prognostic genes from the DEGs in the TCGA-OV cohort. The study found enrichment of gene sets in the histone modification pathway and identified five prognostic genes associated with OC prognosis. The constructed risk score model based on histone modification-related genes was correlated with immune infiltration of T cells and M1 macrophages. Mutations are more prevalent in the high-risk group compared to the low-risk group. Several drugs were screened against the model genes. Through in vitro experiments, we confirmed the expression patterns of the model genes. LBX2 facilitates the proliferation of OC. Histone modification-related genes have the potential to serve as biomarkers for predicting OC prognosis. Targeting these genes may lead to the development of more effective therapies for OC. Additionally, LBX2 represents a novel cell proliferation promoter in OC carcinogenesis.

Targeting 'histone mark': Advanced approaches in epigenetic regulation of telomere dynamics in cancer.

Telomere integrity is required for the maintenance of genome stability and prevention of oncogenic transformation of cells. Recent evidence suggests the presence of epigenetic modifications as an important regulator of mammalian telomeres. Telomeric and subtelomeric regions are rich in epigenetic marks that regulate telomere length majorly through DNA methylation and post-translational histone modifications. Specific histone modifying enzymes play an integral role in establishing telomeric histone codes necessary for the maintenance of structural integrity. Alterations of crucial histone moieties and histone modifiers cause deregulations in the telomeric chromatin leading to carcinogenic manifestations. This review delves into the significance of histone modifications and their influence on telomere dynamics concerning cancer. Additionally, it highlights the existing research gaps that hold the potential to drive the development of therapeutic interventions targeting the telomere epigenome.

Overexpression of SOX2 Gene by Histone Modifications: SOX2 Enhances Human Prostate and Breast Cancer Progression by Prevention of Apoptosis and Enhancing Cell Proliferation.

INTRODUCTION: SOX2 plays a crucial role in tumor development, cancer stem cell maintenance, and cancer progression. Mechanisms of SOX2 gene regulation in human breast and prostate cancers are not established yet. METHODS: SOX2 expression in prostate and breast cancer tissues and cell lines was determined by qRT-PCR, Western blot, and immunochemistry, followed by the investigation of pro-tumorigenic properties like cell proliferation, migration, and apoptosis by gene knockdown and treatment with epigenetic modulators and ChIP. RESULTS: Prostate and breast cancer tissues showed very high expression of SOX2. All cancer cell lines DU145 and PC3 (prostate) and MCF7 and MDA-MB-231 (breast) exhibited high expression of SOX2. Inhibition of SOX2 drastically decreased cell proliferation and migration. Epigenetic modulators enhanced SOX2 gene expression in both cancer types. DNA methylation pattern in SOX2 promoter could not be appreciably counted for SOX2 overexpression. Activation of SOX2 gene promoter was due to very high deposition of H3K4me3 and H3K9acS10p and drastic decrease of H3K9me3 and H3K27me3. CONCLUSION: Histone modification is crucial for the overexpression of SOX2 during tumor development and cancer progression. These findings show the avenue of co-targeting SOX2 and its active epigenetic modifier enzymes to effectively treat aggressive prostate and breast cancers.

Genome-wide analysis of histone modifications that underlie the dynamic changes in gene expression during decidualization in human endometrial stromal cells.

Human endometrial stromal cells (hESCs) undergo a differentiation process with dramatic changes in cell functions during the menstrual cycle, which is called decidualization. This is an important event for implantation of the embryo and successful pregnancy. Defective decidualization can cause implantation failure, miscarriage, and unexplained infertility. A number of genes are upregulated or downregulated during decidualization. Recent studies have shown that epigenetic mechanisms are involved in the regulation of decidualization-related genes and that histone modifications occur throughout the genome during decidualization. The present review focuses on the involvement of genome-wide histone modifications in dramatic changes in gene expression during decidualization. The main histone modifications are the increases of H3K27ac and H3K4me3, which activate transcription. C/EBPß works as a pioneer factor throughout the genome by recruiting p300. This is the main cause of the genome-wide acetylation of H3K27 during decidualization. Histone modifications were observed in both the proximal promoter and distal enhancer regions. Genome editing experiments show that the distal regions have transcriptional activities, which suggests that decidualization induces the interactions between proximal promoter and distal enhancer regions. Taken together, these findings show that gene regulation during decidualization is closely associated with genome-wide changes of histone modifications. This review provides new insights regarding the cases of implantation failure in terms of decidualization insufficiency owing to epigenetic dysregulation, and may lead to novel treatment options for women with implantation failure.

Broad H3K4me3 domains: Maintaining cellular identity and their implication in super-enhancer hijacking.

The human and mouse genomes are complex from a genomic standpoint. Each cell has the same genomic sequence, yet a wide array of cell types exists due to the presence of a plethora of regulatory elements in the non-coding genome. Recent advances in epigenomic profiling have uncovered non-coding gene proximal promoters and distal enhancers of transcription genome-wide. Extension of promoter-associated H3K4me3 histone mark across the gene body, known as a broad H3K4me3 domain (H3K4me3-BD), is a signature of constitutive expression of cell-type-specific regulation and of tumour suppressor genes in healthy cells. Recently, it has been discovered that the presence of H3K4me3-BDs over oncogenes is a cancer-specific feature associated with their dysregulated gene expression and tumourigenesis. Moreover, it has been shown that the hijacking of clusters of enhancers, known as super-enhancers (SE), by proto-oncogenes results in the presence of H3K4me3-BDs over the gene body. Therefore, H3K4me3-BDs and SE crosstalk in healthy and cancer cells therefore represents an important mechanism to identify future treatments for patients with SE driven cancers.

Epigenetic Control of Cancer Cell Proliferation and Cell Cycle Progression by HNRNPK via Promoting Exon 4 Inclusion of Histone Code Reader SPIN1.

Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein K (HNRNPK, hnRNP K), a multifunctional RNA/DNA binding protein, mainly regulates transcription, translation and RNA splicing, and then plays oncogenic roles in many cancers. However, the related mechanisms remain largely unknown. Here, we found that HNRNPK can partially epigenetically regulate cancer cell proliferation via increasing transcription and exon 4-inclusion of SPIN1, an important oncogenic histone code reader. This exon 4 skipping event of SPIN1 generates a long non-coding RNA, followed by the downregulation of SPIN1 protein. SPIN1 is one of the most significantly co-expressed genes of HNRNPK in thirteen TCGA cancers. Our further studies revealed HNRNPK knockdown significantly inhibited cell growth and cell cycle progression in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) cells and promoted cell apoptosis. Overexpression of SPIN1 was able to partially rescue the growth inhibition triggered by HNRNPK knockdown. Moreover, CCND1 (Cyclin D1), a key cell cycle regulator and oncogene, epigenetically up-regulated by SPIN1, was also positively regulated by HNRNPK. In addition, we discovered that HNRNPK promoted SPIN1 exon 4 inclusion by interacting with an intronic splicing enhancer in intron 4. Collectively, our study suggests a novel epigenetic regulatory pathway of HNRNPK in OSCC, mediated by controlling the transcription activity and alternative splicing of SPIN1 gene.

Histone Marks-Dependent Effect on Alternative Splicing: New Perspectives for Targeted Splicing Modulation in Cancer?

Alternative splicing (AS) is a tightly regulated mechanism that generates the complex human proteome from a small number of genes. Cis-regulatory RNA motifs in exons and introns control AS, recruiting positive and negative trans-acting splicing regulators. At a higher level, chromatin affects splicing events. Growing evidence indicates that the popular histone code hypothesis can be extended to RNA-level processes, such as AS. In addition to nucleosome positioning, which can generate transcriptional barriers to shape the final splicing outcome, histone post-translational modifications can contribute to the detailed regulation of single exon inclusion/exclusion. A histone-based system can identify alternatively spliced chromatin stretches, affecting RNAPII elongation locally or recruiting splicing components via adaptor complexes. In tumor cells, several mechanisms trigger misregulated AS events and produce cancer-associated transcripts. On a genome-wide level, aberrant AS can be the consequence of dysfunctional epigenetic splicing code, including altered enrichment in histone post-translational modifications. This review describes the main findings related to the effect of histone modifications and variants on splicing outcome and how a dysfunctional epigenetic splicing code triggers aberrant AS in cancer. In addition, it highlights recent advances in programmable DNA-targeting technologies and their possible application for AS targeted epigenetic modulation.

DNA Methylation and Histone Modification in Dental-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells.

Epigenetic regulation, mainly involving DNA methylation, histone modification, and noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs), is essential for the regulation of multiple cellular processes. Dental-derived mesenchymal stem cells (DMSCs), a kind of multipotent cells derived from dental tissues, are impactful in regenerative medicine. Recent studies have shown that epigenetic regulation plays a major role in DMSCs. Therefore, exploring how epigenetic regulation is involved in DMSCs may be of guiding significance for tissue repair and regeneration or for exploring more effective treatments. A number of research of ncRNAs in DMSCs have been reported. However, little is known about the roles of DNA methylation and histone modifications in DMSCs. In this review, we summarize the important roles of DNA methylation and histone modifications of the fate of DMSCs.

Histone Modification on Parathyroid Tumors: A Review of Epigenetics.

Parathyroid tumors are very prevalent conditions among endocrine tumors, being the second most common behind thyroid tumors. Secondary hyperplasia can occur beyond benign and malignant neoplasia in parathyroid glands. Adenomas are the leading cause of hyperparathyroidism, while carcinomas represent less than 1% of the cases. Tumor suppressor gene mutations such as MEN1 and CDC73 were demonstrated to be involved in tumor development in both familiar and sporadic types; however, the epigenetic features of the parathyroid tumors are still a little-explored subject. We present a review of epigenetic mechanisms related to parathyroid tumors, emphasizing advances in histone modification and its perspective of becoming a promising area in parathyroid tumor research.

Identification and expression analysis of histone modification gene (HM) family during somatic embryogenesis of oil palm.

BACKGROUND: Oil palm (Elaeis guineensis, Jacq.) is an important vegetable oil-yielding plant. Somatic embryogenesis is a promising method to produce large-scale elite clones to meet the demand for palm oil. The epigenetic mechanisms such as histone modifications have emerged as critical factors during somatic embryogenesis. These histone modifications are associated with the regulation of various genes controlling somatic embryogenesis. To date, none of the information is available on the histone modification gene (HM) family in oil palm. RESULTS: We reported the identification of 109 HM gene family members including 48 HMTs, 27 HDMs, 13 HATs, and 21 HDACs in the oil palm genome. Gene structural and motif analysis of EgHMs showed varied exon-intron organization and with conserved motifs among them. The identified 109 EgHMs were distributed unevenly across 16 chromosomes and displayed tandem duplication in oil palm genome. Furthermore, relative expression analysis showed the differential expressional pattern of 99 candidate EgHM genes at different stages (non-embryogenic, embryogenic, somatic embryo) of somatic embryogenesis process in oil palm, suggesting the EgHMs play vital roles in somatic embryogenesis. Our study laid a foundation to understand the regulatory roles of several EgHM genes during somatic embryogenesis. CONCLUSIONS: A total of 109 histone modification gene family members were identified in the oil palm genome via genome-wide analysis. The present study provides insightful information regarding HM gene's structure, their distribution, duplication in oil palm genome, and also their evolutionary relationship with other HM gene family members in Arabidopsis and rice. Finally, our study provided an essential role of oil palm HM genes during somatic embryogenesis process.

It's all in the combination: decoding the epigenome for cancer research and diagnostics.

Genome regulation is governed by the dynamics of chromatin modifications. The extensive and diverse array of DNA and histone modifications allow multiple elements to act combinatorically and direct tissue-specific and cell-specific outcomes. Yet, our ability to elucidate these complex combinations and link them to normal genome regulation, as well as understand their deregulation in cancer, has been hindered by the lack of suitable technologies. Here, we describe recent findings indicating the importance of the combinatorial epigenome, and novel methodologies to measure and characterize these combinations. These complementary methods span multiple disciplines, providing a means to decode epigenetic combinations and link them to biological outcomes. Finally, we discuss the promise of harnessing the rich combinatorial epigenetic information to improve cancer diagnostics and monitoring.

The Effect of Organoselenium Compounds on Histone Deacetylase Inhibition and Their Potential for Cancer Therapy.

Genetic and epigenetic changes alter gene expression, contributing to cancer. Epigenetic changes in cancer arise from alterations in DNA and histone modifications that lead to tumour suppressor gene silencing and the activation of oncogenes. The acetylation status of histones and non-histone proteins are determined by the histone deacetylases and histone acetyltransferases that control gene transcription. Organoselenium compounds have become promising contenders in cancer therapeutics. Apart from their anti-oxidative effects, several natural and synthetic organoselenium compounds and metabolites act as histone deacetylase inhibitors, which influence the acetylation status of histones and non-histone proteins, altering gene transcription. This review aims to summarise the effect of natural and synthetic organoselenium compounds on histone and non-histone protein acetylation/deacetylation in cancer therapy.

Trichostatin A Relieves Growth Suppression and Restores Histone Acetylation at Specific Sites in a FUS ALS/FTD Yeast Model.

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is an incurable neurodegenerative disease that often occurs concurrently with frontotemporal dementia (FTD), another disorder involving progressive neuronal loss. ALS and FTD form a neurodegenerative continuum and share pathological and genetic features. Mutations in a multitude of genes have been linked to ALS/FTD, including FUS. The FUS protein aggregates and forms inclusions within affected neurons. However, the precise mechanisms connecting protein aggregation to neurotoxicity remain under intense investigation. Recent evidence points to the contribution of epigenetics to ALS/FTD. A main epigenetic mechanism involves the post-translational modification (PTM) of histone proteins. We have previously characterized the histone PTM landscape in a FUS ALS/FTD yeast model, finding a decreased level of acetylation on lysine residues 14 and 56 of histone H3. Here, we describe the first report of amelioration of disease phenotypes by controlling histone acetylation on specific modification sites. We show that inhibiting histone deacetylases, via treatment with trichostatin A, suppresses the toxicity associated with FUS overexpression in yeast by preserving the levels of H3K56ac and H3K14ac without affecting the expression or aggregation of FUS. Our data raise the novel hypothesis that the toxic effect of protein aggregation in neurodegeneration is related to its association with altered histone marks. Altogether, we demonstrate the ability to counter the repercussions of protein aggregation on cell survival by preventing specific histone modification changes. Our findings launch a novel mechanistic framework that will enable alternative therapeutic approaches for ALS/FTD and other neurodegenerative diseases.

Laboratory methods to decipher epigenetic signatures: a comparative review.

Epigenetics refers to nucleotide sequence-independent events, and heritable changes, including DNA methylation and histone modification (as the two main processes), contributing to the phenotypic features of the cell. Both genetics and epigenetics contribute to determining the outcome of regulatory gene expression systems. Indeed, the flexibility of epigenetic effects and stability of genetic coding lead to gene regulation complexity in response signals. Since some epigenetic changes are significant in abnormalities such as cancers and neurodegenerative diseases, the initial changes, dynamic and reversible properties, and diagnostic potential of epigenomic phenomena are subject to epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) for therapeutic aims. Based on recent studies, methodological developments are necessary to improve epigenetic research. As a result, several methods have been developed to explore epigenetic alterations at low, medium, and high scales, focusing on DNA methylation and histone modification detection. In this research field, bisulfite-, enzyme sensitivity- and antibody specificity-based techniques are used for DNA methylation, whereas histone modifications are gained based on antibody recognition. This review provides a mechanism-based understanding and comparative overview of the most common techniques for detecting the status of epigenetic effects, including DNA methylation and histone modifications, for applicable approaches from low- to high-throughput scales.

H3K27ac HiChIP in prostate cell lines identifies risk genes for prostate cancer susceptibility.

Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have identified more than 200 prostate cancer (PrCa) risk regions, which provide potential insights into causal mechanisms. Multiple lines of evidence show that a significant proportion of PrCa risk can be explained by germline causal variants that dysregulate nearby target genes in prostate-relevant tissues, thus altering disease risk. The traditional approach to explore this hypothesis has been correlating GWAS variants with steady-state transcript levels, referred to as expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs). In this work, we assess the utility of chromosome conformation capture (3C) coupled with immunoprecipitation (HiChIP) to identify target genes for PrCa GWAS risk loci. We find that interactome data confirm previously reported PrCa target genes identified through GWAS/eQTL overlap (e.g., MLPH). Interestingly, HiChIP identifies links between PrCa GWAS variants and genes well-known to play a role in prostate cancer biology (e.g., AR) that are not detected by eQTL-based methods. HiChIP predicted enhancer elements at the AR and NKX3-1 prostate cancer risk loci, and both were experimentally confirmed to regulate expression of the corresponding genes through CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) perturbation in LNCaP cells. Our results demonstrate that looping data harbor additional information beyond eQTLs and expand the number of PrCa GWAS loci that can be linked to candidate susceptibility genes.

What Do We Have to Know about PD-L1 Expression in Prostate Cancer? A Systematic Literature Review. Part 5: Epigenetic Regulation of PD-L1.

Epigenetic alterations (including DNA methylation or miRNAs) influence oncogene/oncosuppressor gene expression without changing the DNA sequence. Prostate cancer (PC) displays a complex genetic and epigenetic regulation of cell-growth pathways and tumor progression. We performed a systematic literature review (following PRISMA guidelines) focused on the epigenetic regulation of PD-L1 expression in PC. In PC cell lines, CpG island methylation of the CD274 promoter negatively regulated PD-L1 expression. Histone modifiers also influence the PD-L1 transcription rate: the deletion or silencing of the histone modifiers MLL3/MML1 can positively regulate PD-L1 expression. Epigenetic drugs (EDs) may be promising in reprogramming tumor cells, reversing epigenetic modifications, and cancer immune evasion. EDs promoting a chromatin-inactive transcriptional state (such as bromodomain or p300/CBP inhibitors) downregulated PD-L1, while EDs favoring a chromatin-active state (i.e., histone deacetylase inhibitors) increased PD-L1 expression. miRNAs can regulate PD-L1 at a post-transcriptional level. miR-195/miR-16 were negatively associated with PD-L1 expression and positively correlated to longer biochemical recurrence-free survival; they also enhanced the radiotherapy efficacy in PC cell lines. miR-197 and miR-200a-c positively correlated to PD-L1 mRNA levels and inversely correlated to the methylation of PD-L1 promoter in a large series. miR-570, miR-34a and miR-513 may also be involved in epigenetic regulation.

Interplay of m6 A and histone modifications contributes to temozolomide resistance in glioblastoma.

BACKGROUND: Despite the development of new treatment protocols for glioblastoma (GBM), temozolomide (TMZ) resistance remains a primary hindrance. Previous studies, including our study, have shown that aberrant N6-methyladenosine (m6 A) modification is implicated in GBM pathobiology. However, the roles and precise mechanisms of m6 A modification in the regulation of TMZ resistance in GBM remain unclear. METHODS: m6 A individual-nucleotide-resolution cross-linking and immunoprecipitation sequencing (miCLIP-seq) was performed to identify m6 A modification of transcripts in TMZ-resistant and -sensitive tumors. To explore the role of METTL3 in TMZ resistance, TMZ-resistant GBM cells were transfected with METTL3 shRNA or overexpression lentivirus and then assessed by cell viability, tumor sphere formation, and apoptosis assays. An intracranial GBM xenograft model was developed to verify the effect of METTL3 depletion during TMZ treatment in vivo. ATAC-seq, ChIP-qPCR, and dual-luciferase reporter assays were carried out to verify the role of SOX4/EZH2 in the modulation of METTL3 expression upon TMZ treatment. RESULTS: We demonstrated that TMZ treatment upregulated the expression of the m6 A methyltransferase METTL3, thereby increasing m6 A modification of histone modification-related gene transcripts. METTL3 is required to maintain the features of GBM stem cells. When combined with TMZ, METTL3 silencing suppressed orthotopic TMZ-resistant xenograft growth in a cooperative manner. Mechanistically, TMZ induced a SOX4-mediated increase in chromatin accessibility at the METTL3 locus by promoting H3K27ac levels and recruiting RNA polymerase II. Moreover, METTL3 depletion affected the deposition of m6 A on histone modification-related gene transcripts, such as EZH2, leading to nonsense-mediated mRNA decay. We revealed an important role of EZH2 in the regulation of METTL3 expression, which was via an H3K27me3 modification-independent manner. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings uncover the fundamental mechanisms underlying the interplay of m6 A RNA modification and histone modification in TMZ resistance and emphasize the therapeutic potential of targeting the SOX4/EZH2/METTL3 axis in the treatment of TMZ-resistant GBM.

Integrative Chemical Biology Approaches to Deciphering the Histone Code: A Problem-Driven Journey.

The hereditary blueprint of a eukaryotic cell is encoded in its genomic DNA that is tightly compacted into chromatin together with histone proteins. The basic repeating units of chromatin fibers are nucleosomes, in which approximately 1.7 turns of DNA wrap around a proteinaceous octamer consisting of two copies of histones H2A, H2B, H3, and H4. Histones are extensively decorated by a variety of posttranslational modifications (PTMs, e.g., methylation, acetylation, ubiquitylation, phosphorylation, etc.), serving as one of the cellular mechanisms that regulates DNA-templated processes, including but not limited to gene transcription, DNA replication, and DNA damage repair. Most of the histone PTMs exist in dynamic fluctuations, and their on and off states are exquisitely regulated by enzymes known as "writers" and "erasers", respectively. When installed at certain sites, histone PTMs can change the local physicochemical environment and thereby directly influence the nucleosome and chromatin structures. Alternatively, histone PTMs can recruit effectors (or "readers") to signal the downstream events. A "histone code" hypothesis has been proposed in which the combinatory actions of different histone PTMs orchestrate the epigenetic landscape of cells, modulating the activity of the underlying DNA and maintaining the genome stability between generations. Accumulating evidence also suggests that malfunctions of histone PTMs are associated with the pathogenesis of human diseases, such as cancer. It is therefore important to fully decipher the histone code, namely, to dissect the regulatory mechanisms and biological functions of histone PTMs.Owing to the advances in state-of-the-art mass spectrometry, dozens of novel histone modifications have been archived during the past decade. However, most of these newly identified histone PTMs remain poorly explored. To unravel the roles played by these PTMs in histone code, key questions that have driven our study are (i) how to detect the novel histone PTMs; (ii) how to identify the enzymes that catalyze the addition (writers) and removal (erasers) of the histone PTMs along with the regulating mechanisms; (iii) what is the biological significance of the histone PTMs and how do they function, by affecting the nucleosome and chromatin dynamics or by recruiting readers; and (iv) how to develop chemical probes to interrogate the histone PTMs or even serve as potential leads for the drug discovery campaigns to treat diseases caused by abnormalities in the regulation of histone PTMs.This Account focuses on our efforts in developing and applying chemical tools and methods to answer the above questions. Specifically, we review the detection of negatively charged histone acylations by developing and applying chemical reporters; preparing homogeneous nucleosomes carrying negatively charged acylations by protein chemistry approaches and the in vitro biophysical analyses of the effects of the acylations on nucleosome structures; investigating the negatively charged acylations' influence on chromatin dynamics in vivo using yeast genetic approaches; identifying and characterizing protein-protein interactions (PPIs) mediated by histone PTMs in different biological contexts (i.e., to identify the readers and erasers) by establishing a chemical proteomics platform that is enabled by photo-cross-linking chemistry and quantitative proteomics strategies; and manipulating PTM-mediated PPIs by the structure-guided design of inhibitors. We also discuss possible future directions in our journey to fully decipher the histone code.

The roles of epigenetics in cancer progression and metastasis.

Cancer metastasis remains a major clinical challenge for cancer treatment. It is therefore crucial to understand how cancer cells establish and maintain their metastatic traits. However, metastasis-specific genetic mutations have not been identified in most exome or genome sequencing studies. Emerging evidence suggests that key steps of metastasis are controlled by reversible epigenetic mechanisms, which can be targeted to prevent and treat the metastatic disease. A variety of epigenetic mechanisms were identified to regulate metastasis, including the well-studied DNA methylation and histone modifications. In the past few years, large scale chromatin structure alterations including reprogramming of the enhancers and chromatin accessibility to the transcription factors were shown to be potential driving force of cancer metastasis. To dissect the molecular mechanisms and functional output of these epigenetic changes, it is critical to use advanced techniques and alternative animal models for interdisciplinary and translational research on this topic. Here we summarize our current understanding of epigenetic aberrations in cancer progression and metastasis, and their implications in developing new effective metastasis-specific therapies.