Effects of alfaxalone, thiopental, or propofol and diazepam on laryngeal motion in healthy dogs.

Laryngeal function is assessed by direct visualization of the larynx under a light plane of anesthesia. This study compared the effects of 3 anesthetic protocols on arytenoid motion in healthy dogs. Eight dogs were randomly assigned to receive alfaxalone, propofol and diazepam, or thiopental. Videolaryngoscopy was performed and still images at maximum inspiration and expiration were used to measure the area and height of the glottal gap. The normalized glottal gap area (NGGA = area in pixels/height2) was calculated. The NGAA change was defined as the difference between NGAA during inspiration and exhalation. Data were analyzed using Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests, P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. No significant difference among induction protocols was found when comparing NGGA change after induction or before recovery. Alfaxalone and propofol/diazepam are useful for evaluation of laryngeal function when administered to effect and a light plane of anesthesia is maintained.

Effets de l'alfaxalone, du thiopental ou du propofol et du diazépam sur le mouvement du larynx chez des chiens en santé. La fonction du larynx est évaluée par visualisation directe du larynx sous une légère anesthésie. Cette étude a comparé les effets de trois protocoles anesthésiques sur le mouvement aryténoïde chez des chiens en santé. Huit chiens ont été assignés au hasard pour recevoir de l'alfaxalone, du propofol et du diazépam ou du thiopental. Une vidéo-laryngoscopie a été réalisée et des images fixes à l'inspiration et à l'expiration maximales ont été utilisées pour mesurer la région et la hauteur de l'écart glottal. La région normalisée de l'écart glottal (RNEG = région en pixels/hauteur2) a été calculée. Le changement RNEG a été défini comme la différence entre le RNEG durant l'inspiration et l'expiration. Les données ont été analysées en utilisant les tests de Mann-Whitney et Kruskal-Wallis, les valeurs-P < 0,05 étaient considérées comme étant significatives sur le plan statistique. Aucune différence significative n'a été trouvée parmi les protocoles d'induction lors de la comparaison du changement RNEG après l'induction ou le réveil. L'alfaxalone et le propofol/diazépam sont utiles pour l'évaluation de la fonction du larynx lorsqu'ils sont administrés jusqu'à l'effet et qu'une légère anesthésie est maintenue.(Traduit par Isabelle Vallières).

Effects of thiopentone, propofol and alfaxalone on laryngeal motion during oral laryngoscopy in healthy dogs.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of thiopentone, propofol and alfaxalone on arytenoid cartilage motion and establish the dose rates to achieve a consistent oral laryngoscopy examination. STUDY DESIGN: Randomised crossover study. ANIMALS: Six healthy adult Beagle dogs. METHODS: Each dog was randomly administered three induction agents with a 1-week washout period between treatments. Thiopentone (7.5 mg kg-1), propofol (3 mg kg-1) or alfaxalone (1.5 mg kg-1) was administered over 1 minute for induction of anaesthesia. If the dog was deemed inadequately anaesthetised, then supplemental boluses of 1.8, 0.75 and 0.4 mg kg-1 were administered, respectively. Continual examination of the larynx, using a laryngoscope, commenced once an adequate anaesthetic depth was reached until examination end point. The number of arytenoid motions and vital breaths were counted during three time periods and compared over time and among treatments. Data were analysed using Friedman and Mann-Whitney U tests, Spearman rho and a linear mixed model with post hoc pairwise comparison with Tukey correction. RESULTS: The median (range) induction and examination times were 2.8 (2.0-3.0), 2.7 (2.0-3.3) and 2.5 (1.7-3.3) minutes (p = 0.727); and 14.1 (8.0-41.8), 5.4 (3.3-14.8) and 8.5 (3.8-31.6) minutes (p = 0.016) for thiopentone, propofol and alfaxalone, respectively. The median dose rates required to achieve an adequate anaesthetic depth were 6.3 (6.0-6.6), 2.4 (2.4-2.4) and 1.2 (1.2-1.2) mg kg-1 minute-1, respectively. There was no significant difference for the total number of arytenoid motions (p = 0.662) or vital breaths (p = 0.789) among induction agents. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The number of arytenoid motions were similar among the induction agents. However, at the dose rates used in this study, propofol provided adequate conditions for evaluation of the larynx with a shorter examination time which may be advantageous during laryngoscopy in dogs.

Effect of three anesthetic induction protocols on laryngeal motion during laryngoscopy in normal cats.

OBJECTIVES: To objectively measure and subjectively score the effect of 3 anesthetic induction protocols on arytenoid cartilage motion in normal cats. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized prospective clinical study. ANIMALS: Cats (n = 35) without previous history of respiratory dysfunction. METHODS: Cats were randomly assigned to administration of alfaxalone, propofol, or midazolam and ketamine to induce anesthesia after premedication with methadone. Videolaryngoscopy was performed. Still images at maximum inspiration and expiration were used to measure the area and height of the rima glottidis. Change in rima glottidis area and of normalized glottal gap area (NGGA = area/height(2) ) was calculated. Subjective scores for arytenoid movement were obtained. Kruskal-Wallis test was performed on change of NGGA and rima glottidis area. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was found between groups for age, sex, body weight, and body condition score. Percentage increase of rima glottidis area and change in NGGA were similar for all groups (P = .33 and P = .29). No significant differences were found for subjective scores between groups (P = .54). Arytenoid movement was not detected during videolaryngoscopy and subjective scoring in 3 cats anesthetized with propofol and in 3 cats anesthetized with midazolam and ketamine, despite presence of respiratory movements. CONCLUSIONS: No difference in laryngeal motion was observed between the 3 protocols used to induce anesthesia in cats premedicated with methadone.

Vocal outcome measures after bilateral posterior cricoarytenoid muscle botulinum toxin injections for abductor spasmodic dysphonia.

OBJECTIVE: To review vocal outcome measures, using the Voice Related Quality of Life (VRQOL) index, after simultaneous bilateral posterior cricoarytenoid muscle botulinum toxin injections. STUDY DESIGN: Case series. SETTING: Tertiary care academic clinic. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Fourteen subjects with abductor spasmodic dysphonia received 37 simultaneous bilateral posterior cricoarytenoid muscle botulinum toxin injections for isolated abductor spasmodic dysphonia (ABSD) over a 16-month period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: VRQOL index. RESULTS: Of the 37 injections, 33 of 37 (89%) resulted in improvement. Three injections resulted in no improvement, and one injection resulted in a worse VRQOL. The overall VRQOL mean improvement was 19.8 (range 5-53), with an average pre/postinjection VRQOL interval of 36 days (range 21-45 days). CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous bilateral posterior cricoarytenoid muscle botulinum injections result in a statistically significant improvement in VRQOL index scores for a high percentage of ABSD patients, thus improving patient quality of life.

Sedation with detomidine and acepromazine influences the endoscopic evaluation of laryngeal function in horses.

REASON FOR PERFORMING STUDY: Endoscopy of the upper airways of horses is used as a diagnostic tool and at purchase examinations. On some occasions it is necessary to use sedation during the procedure and it is often speculated that the result of the examination might be influenced due to the muscle-relaxing properties of the most commonly used sedatives. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of detomidine (0.01 mg/kg bwt) and acepromazine (0.05 mg/kg bwt) on the appearance of symmetry of rima glottidis, ability to abduct maximally the arytenoid cartilages and the effect on recurrent laryngeal neuropathy (RLN) grade. METHODS: Forty-two apparently normal horses underwent endoscopic examination of the upper airways on 3 different occasions, under the influence of 3 different treatments: no sedation (control), sedation with detomidine and sedation with acepromazine. All examinations were performed with a minimum of one week apart. The study was performed as an observer-blind cross-over study. RESULTS: Sedation with detomidine had a significant effect on the RLN grading (OR = 2.91) and ability maximally to abduct the left arytenoid cartilages (OR = 2.91). Sedation with acepromazine resulted in OR = 2.43 for the RLN grading and OR = 2.22 for the ability to abduct maximally. The ability to abduct maximally the right arytenoid cartilage was not altered. CONCLUSIONS: Sedating apparently healthy horses with detomidine or acepromazine significantly impairs these horses' ability to abduct fully the left but not the right arytenoid cartilage. This resulted in different diagnosis with respect to RLN when comparing sedation to no sedation. POTENTIAL RELEVANCE: Since the ability to abduct the right arytenoid cartilage fully is not altered by sedation, it is speculated that horses changing from normal to abnormal laryngeal function when sedated, might be horses in an early stage of the disease. To confirm or reject these speculations, further studies are needed. Until then sedation during endoscopy should be used with care.

Effects of various anesthetic agents on laryngeal motion during laryngoscopy in normal dogs.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of various drugs and drug combinations conventionally used for anesthesia on arytenoid cartilage motion during laryngoscopy in normal dogs. STUDY DESIGN: Experimental study. ANIMALS: Six large breed healthy dogs with no previous history of respiratory dysfunction. METHODS: Each dog was randomly assigned to a different injectable anesthetic protocol once weekly for 6 weeks, then in the 7th week all dogs were anesthetized with isoflurane. Videolaryngoscopy was performed and recorded starting immediately after induction until dogs could no longer be safely restrained for endoscopy. Video was digitized and 3 still images of maximal inspiration and expiration from the first 15 seconds (induction) and the last 15 seconds (recovery) were captured and imported into an image analysis software program. The height and area of the laryngeal ostium were measured in pixels. Normalization of the glottal gap area was performed using the formula (normalized glottal gap area (NGGA)=area in pixels/height(2)). ANOVA was performed on the NGGA of images collected at inspiration and expiration during induction and recovery. Fischer's exact test was performed when significance (P<.05) was found. RESULTS: Within each protocol, laryngeal motion (defined as change in NGGA) at induction was not significantly different from laryngeal motion measured at recovery. Additionally, no significant differences were found in arytenoid motion immediately after induction when anesthetic protocols were compared. Arytenoid motion before recovery was significantly greater with thiopental when compared with propofol (P=.046), ketamine+diazepam (P=.0098), acepromazine+thiopental (P=.0021), and acepromazine+propofol (P=.0065). No significant difference in arytenoid motion was seen immediately after induction or before recovery when acepromazine+butorphanol+ isoflurane and thiopental were compared. CONCLUSION: We concluded that intravenous thiopental given to effect is the best choice for assessing laryngeal function in dogs. Dogs premedicated with acepromazine with or without opioids that require further anesthetic restraint for laryngoscopy should be anesthetized with isoflurane administered by mask. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Misdiagnosis of laryngeal paralysis during laryngoscopy can be avoided by selecting the anesthetic regimens with the least effect on arytenoid motion.

The reliability of endoscopic examination in assessment of arytenoid cartilage movement in horses. Part II. Influence of side of examination, reexamination, and sedation.

Twenty Thoroughbred and Standardbred horses underwent endoscopic evaluation of arytenoid cartilage movement twice within 1 week. Each time, a flexible endoscope was passed without sedation through the right nostril and the left nostril, and through the right nostril 5 minutes after administration of xylazine hydrochloride (0.55 mg/kg or 1.1 mg/kg intravenously). Laryngeal cartilage movement was videorecorded. All videotaped images were reviewed by three veterinarians and subjectively placed in one of four grades. The intraobserver agreement rate varied from 52.6% for examination under sedation with 1.1 mg/kg of xylazine to 89.5% for unsedated reexamination through the left nostril. The effect of the various observations on median laryngeal grade was calculated. Examination under xylazine hydrochloride at either dosage yielded a change in median laryngeal grade from the unsedated examination in 45% of the evaluations. Reevaluation through the right or left nostril resulted in a different median laryngeal grade in 21% and 5% of the examinations, respectively. Objective measurements of the rima glottidis obtained by computer-assisted morphometric analysis of the recorded laryngeal images allowed laryngeal images to be dichotomized regardless of the condition of endoscopic examination. Endoscopic evaluation of laryngeal cartilage movement is subjective and is influenced by sedation with xylazine, evaluation through the alternate nostril, and different day of examination. The most consistent evaluation was obtained during repeated examination through the left nostril.