Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 1.479
Filtrar
Más filtros











Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Front Public Health ; 12: 1383308, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39040867

RESUMEN

Background: With the increasing demand for joint replacement surgery in China, the government has successively issued the policies of national centralized procurement (NCP) and national volume-based procurement (NVBP) of artificial joints. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of NCP and NVBP policies on hospitalization cost, rehospitalization and reoperation rate of total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods: In total, 347 patients who underwent THA from January 2019 to September 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the implementation of NCP and NVBP, patients were divided into three groups: control group (n = 147), NCP group (n = 130), and NVBP group (n = 70). Patient-level data on the total hospitalization costs, rehospitalization rate, THA reoperation rate and inpatient component costs were collected before and after the implementation of the policies and Consumer Price Index was used to standardize the cost. Results: After the implementation of NCP and NVBP, the total cost of hospitalization decreased by $817.41 and $3950.60 (p < 0.01), respectively. The implantation costs decreased from $5264.29 to $4185.53 and then rapidly to $1143.49 (p < 0.01), contributing to increased total cost savings. However, the cost of surgery and rehabilitation increased after NCP and NVBP implementation (p < 0.01). The proportion of implants decreased from 66.76 to 59.22% and then to 29.07%, whereas that of drugs increased from 7.98 to 10.11% and then to 12.06%. The proportion of operating expenses rose from 4.86 to 8.01% and then to 18.47%. Univariate linear regression analysis showed that hospital stay, NCP and NVBP were correlated with total hospitalization cost (p < 0.01). Multivariate analysis showed that hospital stay, NCP and NVBP were independent predictors of total hospitalization cost (p < 0.01). Conclusion: In this study, hospital stay, NCP, and NVBP were independent predictors of total inpatient costs. After the implementation of NVBP policy, the cost of implants and hospitalization has decreased significantly, and the technical labor value of medical staff has increased, but a multifaceted method is still needed to solve the problem of increasing costs of other consumables. Limitations of the study suggest the need for further and more comprehensive evaluation in the future.


Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Hospitalización , Humanos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/economía , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , China , Anciano , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Reoperación/economía , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Readmisión del Paciente/economía
2.
PLoS One ; 19(7): e0305835, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38968247

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To estimate hospital services utilisation and cost among the Indonesian population enrolled in the National Health Insurance (NHI) program before and after COVID-19 hospital treatment. METHODS: 28,159 Indonesian NHI enrolees treated with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 in hospitals between May and August 2020 were compared to 8,995 individuals never diagnosed with COVID-19 in 2020. A difference-in-difference approach is used to contrast the monthly all-cause utilisation rate and total claims of hospital services between these two groups. A period of nine months before and three to six months after hospital treatment were included in the analysis. RESULTS: A substantial short-term increase in hospital services utilisation and cost before and after COVID-19 treatment was observed. Using the fifth month before treatment as the reference period, we observed an increased outpatient visits rate in 1-3 calendar months before and up to 2-4 months after treatment (p<0.001) among the COVID-19 group compared to the comparison group. We also found a higher admissions rate in 1-2 months before and one month after treatment (p<0.001). Consequently, increased hospital costs were observed in 1-3 calendar months before and 1-4 calendar months after the treatment (p<0.001). The elevated hospital resource utilisation was more prominent among individuals older than 40. Overall, no substantial increase in hospital outpatient visits, admissions, and costs beyond four months after and five months before COVID-19 treatment. CONCLUSION: Individuals with COVID-19 who required hospital treatment had considerably higher healthcare resource utilisation in the short-term, before and after the treatment. These findings indicated that the total cost of treating COVID-19 patients might include the pre- and post-acute period.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Hospitalización , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/economía , COVID-19/terapia , Indonesia/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hospitalización/economía , Anciano , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , SARS-CoV-2 , Niño , Preescolar , Lactante , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Programas Nacionales de Salud/economía
3.
BMC Cancer ; 24(1): 864, 2024 Jul 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39026195

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Because the proportion of elderly individuals and the incidence of cancer worldwide are continually increasing, medical costs for elderly inpatients with cancer are being significantly increasing, which puts tremendous financial pressure on their families and society. The current study described the actual direct medical costs of elderly inpatients with cancer and analyzed the influencing factors for the costs to provide advice on the prevention and control of the high medical costs of elderly patients with cancer. METHOD: A retrospective descriptive analysis was performed on the hospitalization expense data of 11,399 elderly inpatients with cancer at a tier-3 hospital in Dalian between June 2016 and June 2020. The differences between different groups were analyzed using univariate analysis, and the influencing factors of hospitalization expenses were explored by multiple linear regression analysis. RESULTS: The hospitalization cost of elderly cancer patients showed a decreasing trend from 2016 to 2020. Specifically, the top 3 hospitalization costs were material costs, drug costs and surgery costs, which accounted for greater than 10% of all cancers according to the classification: colorectal (23.96%), lung (21.74%), breast (12.34%) and stomach cancer (12.07%). Multiple linear regression analysis indicated that cancer type, surgery, year and length of stay (LOS) had a common impact on the four types of hospitalization costs (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: There were significant differences in the four types of hospitalization costs for elderly cancer patients according to the LOS, surgery, year and type of cancer. The study results suggest that the health administration department should enhance the supervision of hospital costs and elderly cancer patient treatment. Measures should be taken by relying on the hospital information system to strengthen the cost management of cancer diseases and departments, optimize the internal management system, shorten elderly cancer patients LOS, and reasonably control the costs of disease diagnosis, treatment and department operation to effectively reduce the economic burden of elderly cancer patients.


Asunto(s)
Hospitalización , Neoplasias , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano , Femenino , Masculino , Neoplasias/economía , Neoplasias/terapia , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Hospitalización/economía , China/epidemiología , Centros de Atención Terciaria/economía , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos
4.
Ann Plast Surg ; 92(6S Suppl 4): S408-S412, 2024 Jun 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38857005

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The healthcare costs for treatment of community-acquired decubitus ulcers accounts for $11.6 billion in the United States annually. Patients with stage 3 and 4 decubitus ulcers are often treated inefficiently prior to reconstructive surgery while physicians attempt to optimize their condition (debridement, fecal/urinary diversion, physical therapy, nutrition, and obtaining durable medical goods). We hypothesized that hospital costs for inpatient optimization of decubitus ulcers would significantly differ from outpatient optimization costs, resulting in significant financial losses to the hospital and that transitioning optimization to an outpatient setting could reduce both total and hospital expenditures. In this study, we analyzed and compared the financial expenditures of optimizing patients with decubitus ulcers in an inpatient setting versus maximizing outpatient utilization of resources prior to reconstruction. METHODS: Encounters of patients with stage 3 or 4 decubitus ulcers over a 5-year period were investigated. These encounters were divided into two groups: Group 1 included patients who were optimized totally inpatient prior to reconstructive surgery; group 2 included patients who were mostly optimized in an outpatient setting and this encounter was a planned admission for their reconstructive surgery. Demographics, comorbidities, paralysis status, and insurance carriers were collected for all patients. Financial charges and reimbursements were compared among the groups. RESULTS: Forty-five encounters met criteria for inclusion. Group 1's average hospital charges were $500,917, while group 2's charges were $134,419. The cost of outpatient therapeutic items for patient optimization prior to wound closure was estimated to be $10,202 monthly. When including an additional debridement admission for group 2 patients (average of $108,031), the maximal charges for total care was $252,652, and hospital reimbursements were similar between group 1 and group 2 ($65,401 vs $50,860 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The data derived from this investigation strongly suggests that optimizing patients in an outpatient setting prior to decubitus wound closure versus managing the patients totally on an inpatient basis will significantly reduce hospital charges, and hence costs, while minimally affecting reimbursements to the hospital.


Asunto(s)
Úlcera por Presión , Humanos , Úlcera por Presión/economía , Úlcera por Presión/terapia , Úlcera por Presión/cirugía , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Atención Ambulatoria/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/economía , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/economía , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/economía , Adulto , Anciano de 80 o más Años
5.
Obstet Gynecol ; 144(2): 266-274, 2024 Aug 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38870524

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare inpatient hospital costs and complication rates within the 90-day global billing period among routes of hysterectomy. METHODS: The Premier Healthcare Database was used to identify patients who underwent hysterectomy between 2000 and 2020. Current Procedural Terminology codes were used to group patients based on route of hysterectomy. Comorbidities and complications were identified using International Classification of Diseases codes. Fixed, variable, and total costs for inpatient care were compared. Fixed costs consist of costs that are set for the case, such as operating room time or surgeon costs. Variable costs include disposable and reusable items that are billed additionally. Total costs equal fixed and variable costs combined. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance, t test, and χ 2 test, as appropriate. Factors independently associated with increased total costs were assessed using linear mixed effects models. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to evaluate associations between the route of surgery and complication rates. RESULTS: A cohort of 400,977 patients were identified and grouped by route of hysterectomy. Vaginal hysterectomy demonstrated the lowest inpatient total cost ($6,524.00 [interquartile range $4,831.60, $8,785.70]), and robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy had the highest total cost ($9,386.80 [interquartile range $6,912.40, $12,506.90]). These differences persisted with fixed and variable costs. High-volume laparoscopic and robotic surgeons (more than 50 cases per year) had a decrease in the cost difference when compared with costs of vaginal hysterectomy. Abdominal hysterectomy had a higher rate of complications relative to vaginal hysterectomy (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.52, 95% CI, 1.39-1.67), whereas laparoscopic (aOR 0.85, 95% CI, 0.80-0.89) and robotic-assisted (aOR 0.92, 95% CI, 0.84-1.00) hysterectomy had lower rates of complications compared with vaginal hysterectomy. CONCLUSION: Robotic-assisted hysterectomy is associated with higher surgical costs compared with other approaches, even when accounting for surgeon volume. Complication rates are low for minimally invasive surgery, and it is unlikely that the robotic-assisted approach provides an appreciable improvement in perioperative outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Costos de Hospital , Histerectomía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Enfermedades Uterinas , Humanos , Femenino , Histerectomía/economía , Histerectomía/métodos , Histerectomía/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades Uterinas/cirugía , Enfermedades Uterinas/economía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/economía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Adulto , Histerectomía Vaginal/economía , Histerectomía Vaginal/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/economía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/economía , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , Bases de Datos Factuales
6.
Tech Coloproctol ; 28(1): 66, 2024 Jun 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38850445

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We aimed to compare outcomes and cost effectiveness of extra-corporeal anastomosis (ECA) versus intra-corporeal anastomosis (ICA) for laparoscopic right hemicolectomy using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Programme data. METHODS: Patients who underwent elective laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colon cancer from January 2018 to December 2022 were identified. Non-cancer diagnoses, emergency procedures or synchronous resection of other organs were excluded. Surgical characteristics, peri-operative outcomes, long-term survival and hospitalisation costs were compared. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was used to evaluate cost-effectiveness. RESULTS: A total of 223 patients (175 ECA, 48 ICA) were included in the analysis. Both cohorts exhibited comparable baseline patient, comorbidity, and tumour characteristics. Distribution of pathological TMN stage, tumour largest dimension, total lymph node harvest and resection margin lengths were statistically similar. ICA was associated with a longer median operative duration compared with ECA (255 min vs. 220 min, P < 0.001). There was a quicker time to gastrointestinal recovery, with a shorter median hospital stay in the ICA group (4.0 versus 5.0 days, P = 0.001). Overall complication rates were comparable. ICA was associated with a higher surgical procedure cost (£6301.57 versus £4998.52, P < 0.001), but lower costs for ward accommodation (£1679.05 versus £2420.15, P = 0.001) and treatment (£3774.55 versus £4895.14, P = 0.009), with a 4.5% reduced overall cost compared with ECA. The ICER of -£3323.58 showed ICA to be more cost effective than ECA, across a range of willingness-to-pay thresholds. CONCLUSION: ICA in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy is associated with quicker post-operative recovery and may be more cost effective compared with ECA, despite increased operative costs.


Asunto(s)
Anastomosis Quirúrgica , Colectomía , Neoplasias del Colon , Laparoscopía , Tempo Operativo , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/economía , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/métodos , Colectomía/economía , Colectomía/métodos , Neoplasias del Colon/cirugía , Neoplasias del Colon/economía , Análisis de Costo-Efectividad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/economía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/métodos , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Laparoscopía/economía , Laparoscopía/métodos , Laparoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/economía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
Surgery ; 176(2): 282-288, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38760232

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: With the steady rise in health care expenditures, the examination of factors that may influence the costs of care has garnered much attention. Although machine learning models have previously been applied in health economics, their application within cardiac surgery remains limited. We evaluated several machine learning algorithms to model hospitalization costs for coronary artery bypass grafting. METHODS: All adult hospitalizations for isolated coronary artery bypass grafting were identified in the 2016 to 2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Machine learning models were trained to predict expenditures and compared with traditional linear regression. Given the significance of postoperative length of stay, we additionally developed models excluding postoperative length of stay to uncover other drivers of costs. To facilitate comparison, machine learning classification models were also trained to predict patients in the highest decile of costs. Significant factors associated with high cost were identified using SHapley Additive exPlanations beeswarm plots. RESULTS: Among 444,740 hospitalizations included for analysis, the median cost of hospitalization in coronary artery bypass grafting patients was $43,103. eXtreme Gradient Boosting most accurately predicted hospitalization costs, with R2 = 0.519 over the validation set. The top predictive features in the eXtreme Gradient Boosting model included elective procedure status, prolonged mechanical ventilation, new-onset respiratory failure or myocardial infarction, and postoperative length of stay. After removing postoperative length of stay, eXtreme Gradient Boosting remained the most accurate model (R2 = 0.38). Prolonged ventilation, respiratory failure, and elective status remained important predictive parameters. CONCLUSION: Machine learning models appear to accurately model total hospitalization costs for coronary artery bypass grafting. Future work is warranted to uncover other drivers of costs and improve the value of care in cardiac surgery.


Asunto(s)
Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Costos de Hospital , Aprendizaje Automático , Humanos , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/economía , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos , Bases de Datos Factuales
8.
Surgery ; 176(2): 289-294, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38772777

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement has become an accepted alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement. We examined the trends and predictors in inflation-adjusted costs of transcatheter aortic valve replacement and surgical aortic valve replacement. METHODS: National Inpatient Sample identified patients who underwent aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revisions, codes. Hospitalization costs were inflation-adjusted using the Federal Reserve's consumer price index to reflect current valuation. Outcomes of interest were unadjusted trend in annual cost for each procedure and predictors of in-patient cost. Generalized linear models with a log link function identified predictors of adjusted costs. Interaction terms determined where cost predictors were different by operation type. RESULTS: Between 2011 and 2019, the mean annual inflation-adjusted cost of surgical aortic valve replacement increased from $62,853 to $63,743, in contrast to decreasing cost of transcatheter aortic valve replacement from $64,913 to $56,042 ($1,854 per year; P = .004). Significant independent predictors of patient-level cost included operation type (transcatheter aortic valve replacement associated with $9,625 increase; P < .001), incidence of in-hospital mortality ($28,836 increase; P < .001), elective status ($2,410 decrease; P < .001), Elixhauser Index ($995 increase; P < .001), and postoperative length of stay ($2,014 per day increase; P < .001). Compared to discharges with Medicare, discharges with private insurance and Medicaid paid $736 less (P = .004) and $1,863 less (P = .01), respectively. Increasing hospital volume was a significant predictor of decreasing patient level cost (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Annual cost of transcatheter aortic valve replacement has decreased significantly and has been a more cost-effective modality compared to surgical aortic valve replacement since 2017. Predictors of patient-level costs allow for mindful preparation of healthcare systems for aortic valve replacement.


Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/economía , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/estadística & datos numéricos , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/tendencias , Anciano , Estados Unidos , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/economía , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/economía , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/tendencias , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/métodos , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de Hospital/tendencias , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Inflación Económica
9.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 24(1): 605, 2024 May 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38720277

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Distal radius fractures (DRFs) have become a public health problem for all countries, bringing a heavier economic burden of disease globally, with China's disease economic burden being even more acute due to the trend of an aging population. This study aimed to explore the influencing factors of hospitalization cost of patients with DRFs in traditional Chinese medicine (TCMa) hospitals to provide a scientific basis for controlling hospitalization cost. METHODS: With 1306 cases of DRFs patients hospitalized in 15 public TCMa hospitals in two cities of Gansu Province in China from January 2017 to 2022 as the study object, the influencing factors of hospitalization cost were studied in depth gradually through univariate analysis, multiple linear regression, and path model. RESULTS: Hospitalization cost of patients with DRFs is mainly affected by the length of stay, surgery and operation, hospital levels, payment methods of medical insurance, use of TCMa preparations, complications and comorbidities, and clinical pathways. The length of stay is the most critical factor influencing the hospitalization cost, and the longer the length of stay, the higher the hospitalization cost. CONCLUSIONS: TCMa hospitals should actively take advantage of TCMb diagnostic modalities and therapeutic methods to ensure the efficacy of treatment and effectively reduce the length of stay at the same time, to lower hospitalization cost. It is also necessary to further deepen the reform of the medical insurance payment methods and strengthen the construction of the hierarchical diagnosis and treatment system, to make the patients receive reasonable reimbursement for medical expenses, thus effectively alleviating the economic burden of the disease in the patients with DRFs.


Asunto(s)
Costos de Hospital , Hospitalización , Tiempo de Internación , Medicina Tradicional China , Fracturas del Radio , Humanos , China , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medicina Tradicional China/economía , Anciano , Fracturas del Radio/economía , Fracturas del Radio/terapia , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/economía , Adulto , Hospitales Públicos/economía , Fracturas de la Muñeca
10.
J Robot Surg ; 18(1): 206, 2024 May 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38717705

RESUMEN

As uptake of robotic-assisted arthroplasty increases there is a need for economic evaluation of the implementation and ongoing costs associated with robotic surgery. The aims of this study were to describe the in-hospital cost of robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) and robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (RA-UKA) and determine the influence of patient characteristics and surgical outcomes on cost. This prospective cohort study included adult patients (≥ 18 years) undergoing primary unilateral RA-TKA and RA-UKA, at a tertiary hospital in Sydney between April 2017 and June 2021. Patient characteristics, surgical outcomes, and in-hospital cost variables were extracted from hospital medical records. Differences between outcomes for RA-TKA and RA-UKA were compared using independent sample t-tests. Logistic regression was performed to determine drivers of cost. Of the 308 robotic-assisted procedures, 247 were RA-TKA and 61 were RA-UKA. Surgical time, time in the operating room, and length of stay were significantly shorter in RA-UKA (p < 0.001); whereas RA-TKA patients were older (p = 0.002) and more likely to be discharged to in-patient rehabilitation (p = 0.009). Total in-hospital cost was significantly higher for RA-TKA cases (AU$18580.02 vs $13275.38; p < 0.001). Robotic system and maintenance cost per case was AU$3867.00 for TKA and AU$5008.77 for UKA. Patients born overseas and lower volume robotic surgeons were significantly associated with higher total cost of RA-UKA. Increasing age and male gender were significantly associated with higher total cost of RA-TKA. Total cost was significantly higher for RA-TKA than RA-UKA. Robotic system costs for RA-UKA are inflated by the software cost relative to the volume of cases compared with RA-TKA. Cost is an important consideration when evaluating long term benefits of robotic-assisted knee arthroplasty in future studies to provide evidence for the economic sustainability of this practice.


Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , Costos de Hospital , Tiempo de Internación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Humanos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/economía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/economía , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/métodos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Tempo Operativo , Resultado del Tratamiento
11.
J Surg Res ; 298: 307-315, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38640616

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Nonoperative management (NOM) of uncomplicated appendicitis (UA) has been increasingly utilized in recent years. The aim of this study was to describe nationwide trends of sociodemographic characteristics, outcomes, and costs of patients undergoing medical versus surgical management for UA. METHODS: The 2018-2019 National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample was queried for adults (age ≥18 y) with UA; diagnosis, as well as laparoscopic and open appendectomy, were defined by the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification codes. We examined several characteristics, including cost of care and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: Among the 167,125 patients with UA, 137,644 (82.4%) underwent operative management and 29,481 (17.6%) underwent NOM. In bivariate analysis, we found that patients who had NOM were older (53 versus 43 y, P < 0.001) and more likely to have Medicare (33.6% versus 16.1%, P < 0.001), with higher prevalence of comorbidities such as diabetes (7.8% versus 5.5%, P < 0.001). The majority of NOM patients were treated at urban teaching hospitals (74.5% versus 66.3%, P < 0.001). They had longer LOS's (5.4 versus 2.3 d, P < 0.001) with higher inpatient costs ($15,584 versus $11,559, P < 0.001) than those who had an appendectomy. Through logistic regression we found that older patients had up to 4.03-times greater odds of undergoing NOM (95% CI: 3.22-5.05, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: NOM of UA is more commonly utilized in patients with comorbidities, older age, and those treated in teaching hospitals. This may, however, come at the price of longer length of stay and higher costs. Further guidelines need to be developed to clearly delineate which patients could benefit from NOM.


Asunto(s)
Apendicectomía , Apendicitis , Tiempo de Internación , Humanos , Apendicitis/cirugía , Apendicitis/economía , Apendicitis/terapia , Apendicitis/epidemiología , Adulto , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Apendicectomía/economía , Apendicectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Anciano , Adulto Joven , Adolescente , Laparoscopía/economía , Laparoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tratamiento Conservador/economía , Tratamiento Conservador/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos
12.
Leuk Lymphoma ; 65(7): 922-931, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38567630

RESUMEN

The efficacy of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) is well-established. This study, using the Premier PINC AI Healthcare Database, assessed hospital costs and healthcare resource utilization (HRU) between CAR T-cell therapy and autologous hematopoietic cell transplant (AHCT) for 733 LBCL patients from 01/01/2017-04/30/2021 (166 CAR T and 567 AHCT from 37 US hospital systems. CAR T-cell therapy had higher index costs but lower non-pharmacy costs, shorter hospital stays, lower ICU utilization than AHCT. The CAR T-cell cohort also presented fewer preparatory costs and HRU. At a 180-day follow-up, AHCT had lower hospitalization rates and costs. Overall, despite higher index costs, CAR T-cell therapy has lower non-pharmacy costs and HRU during the index procedure and requires less preparation time with lower preparation HRUs and costs than AHCT. This has important implications for resource management and informed decision-making for stakeholders.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso , Trasplante Autólogo , Humanos , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/economía , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/métodos , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva/economía , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva/métodos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/terapia , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/economía , Anciano , Receptores Quiméricos de Antígenos , Adulto , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Recursos en Salud/economía , Recursos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Terapia Combinada/economía
13.
Acta Orthop Belg ; 90(1): 27-34, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38669645

RESUMEN

The number of hospital admissions for a hip prosthesis increased by more than 91% between 2002 and 2019 in Belgium (1), making it one of the most common interventions in hospitals. The objective of this study is to evaluate patient-report- ed outcomes and hospital costs of hip replacement six months after surgery. Both generic (EQ-5D) and specific (HOOS) PROMs of general hospital patients undergoing hip replacement surgery in 2021 were conducted. The results of these PROMs were then combined with financial and health management data. The mean difference (SD) in QALYs between the preoperative and postoperative phases is 0.20 QALYs (0.32 QALYs). The average cost (SD) of all stays is €4,792 (€1,640). Amongst the five dimensions evaluated in the EQ-5D health questionnaire, the 'pain' dimension seems to be associated with the greatest improvement in quality of life. As regards Belgium, the 26,066 arthroplasties performed in 2020 might constitute a gain of 123,000 years of life in good health. The relationship between QALYs and costs described in this study posits a ratio of €23,960 per year of life gained in good health. Given that in Belgium more than 3% of the hospital healthcare budget is devoted to hip prostheses, it would seem relevant to us to apply PROM tools to the entire patient population to assess treatment effectiveness more broadly, identify patient needs and, also, monitor the quality of care provided.


Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Osteoartritis de la Cadera , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/economía , Bélgica , Femenino , Masculino , Osteoartritis de la Cadera/cirugía , Osteoartritis de la Cadera/economía , Osteoartritis de la Cadera/terapia , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos
14.
Surg Endosc ; 38(5): 2850-2856, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38568440

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study aims to compare clinical outcomes and financial cost of intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) versus retromuscular (RM) repairs in robotic incisional hernia repairs (rIHR). METHODS: Patients who underwent either IPOM or RM elective rIHR from 2012 to 2022 were included. Demographics, operative details, postoperative outcomes, and hospital costs were directly compared. RESULTS: Sixty-nine IPOM and 55 RM were included. Age and body mass index (BMI) did not differ between both groups (IPOM vs RM: 59.3 ± 11.2 years vs. 57.5 ± 14 years, p = 0.423; BMI 34.1 ± 6.3 vs. BMI 33.2 ± 6.9, p = 0.435, respectively). Comorbidities and hernia characteristics were comparable. Extensive lysis of adhesions (> 30 min) was required more often in IPOM (18 vs. 6 in RM, p = 0.034). Defect closure was achieved in 100% of RM vs. 81.2% in IPOM (p < 0.001). Median (interquartile range) postoperative pain score was higher in RM than in IPOM [5(3-7) vs. 4(3-5), respectively, p = 0.006]. Median length of stay (0 day) and same-day discharge rate did not differ between groups (p = 0.598, p = 0.669, respectively). Six (8.7%) patients in the IPOM group versus one (1.8%) patient in the RM group were readmitted to hospital within 30 days postoperatively (p = 0.099). Perioperative complications were higher in IPOM (p = 0.011; 34.8% vs. 14.5% in RM) with higher Comprehensive Complication Index® morbidity scores [0(0-12.2) vs 0(0-0) in RM, p = 0.008)], Clavien-Dindo grade-II complications (8 vs 0 in RM, p = 0.009), and surgical site events (17 vs. 5 in RM, p = 0.024). Within a follow-up period of 57(± 28) months, recurrence rates were similar between both groups. Hospital costs did not differ between groups [IPOM: $9978 (7031-12,926) vs. RM: $8961(6701-11,222), p = 0.300]. Although postoperative complication costs were higher in IPOM ($2436 vs RM: $161, p = 0.020), total costs were comparable [IPOM: $12,415(8700-16,130) vs. RM: $9123(6789-11,457), p = 0.080]. CONCLUSION: Despite retromuscular repairs having lower postoperative complications than intraperitoneal onlay mesh repairs, both techniques offered encouraging results in robotic incisional hernia repair at a comparable total cost.


Asunto(s)
Herniorrafia , Hernia Incisional , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Mallas Quirúrgicas , Humanos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/economía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mallas Quirúrgicas/economía , Femenino , Masculino , Herniorrafia/métodos , Herniorrafia/economía , Hernia Incisional/cirugía , Hernia Incisional/economía , Anciano , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios Retrospectivos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos
15.
World J Surg ; 48(5): 1096-1101, 2024 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38459712

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Studies show that reducing the length of hospital stay (LOS) for surgical patients leads to cost savings. We hypothesize that LOS has a nonlinear relationship to cost of care and reduction may not have a meaningful impact on it. We have attempted to define the relationship of LOS to cost of care. We utilized the itemized bill, generated in real time, for hospital services. MATERIALS: Adult patients admitted under General, Neuro, and Orthopedic surgery over a 3-month period, with an LOS between 4 and 14 days, were the study population. Itemized bill details were analyzed. Charges in Pakistani rupees were converted to US dollar. Ethical exemption for study was obtained. RESULTS: Of the 853 patients, 38% were admitted to General Surgery, 27% to Neurosurgery, and 35% to Orthopedics. A total of 64% of the patients had an LOS between 4 and 6 days; 36% had an LOS between 7 and 14 days. Operated and conservatively managed constituted 82% and 18%, respectively. Mean total charge for operated patients was higher $3387 versus $1347 for non-operated ones. LOS was seen to have a nonlinear relationship to in-hospital cost of care. The bulk of cost was centered on the day of surgery. This was consistent across all services. The last day of stay contributed 2.4%-3.2% of total charge. CONCLUSIONS: For surgical patients, the cost implications rapidly taper in the postoperative period. The contribution of the last day of stay cost to total cost is small. For meaningful cost containment, focus needs to be on the immediate perioperative period.


Asunto(s)
Tiempo de Internación , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Adulto , Femenino , Masculino , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Ahorro de Costo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pakistán , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/economía , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/economía
16.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol ; 34(4): 1963-1970, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38480531

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Lactic acid is well studied in the trauma population and is frequently used as a laboratory indicator that correlates with resuscitation status and has thus been associated with patient outcomes. There is limited literature that assesses the association of initial lactic acid with post-operative morbidity and hospitalization costs in the orthopedic literature. The purpose of this study was to assess the association of lactic acid levels and alcohol levels post-operative morbidity, length of stay and admission costs in a cohort of operative lower extremity long bone fractures, and to compare these effects in the ballistic and blunt trauma sub-population. METHODS: Patients presenting as trauma activations who underwent tibial and/or femoral fixation at a single institution from May 2018 to August 2020 were divided based on initial lactate level into normal, (< 2.5) intermediate (2.5-4.0), and high (> 4.0). Mechanism of trauma (blunt vs. ballistic) was also stratified for analysis. Data on other injuries, surgical timing, level of care, direct hospitalization costs, length of stay, and discharge disposition were collected from the electronic medical record. The primary outcome assessed was post-operative morbidity defined as in-hospital mortality or unanticipated escalation of care. Secondary outcomes included hospital costs, lengths of stay, and discharge disposition. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and multivariate regression. RESULTS: A total of 401 patients met inclusions criteria. Average age was 34.1 ± 13.0 years old, with patients remaining hospitalized for 8.8 ± 9.5 days, and 35.2% requiring ICU care during their hospitalization. Patients in the ballistic cohort were younger, had fewer other injuries and had higher lactate levels (4.0 ± 2.4) than in the blunt trauma cohort (3.4 ± 1.9) (p = 0.004). On multivariate regression, higher lactate was associated with post-operative morbidity (p = 0.015), as was age (p < 0.001) and BMI (p = 0.033). ISS, ballistic versus blunt injury mechanism, and other included laboratory markers were not. Lactate was also associated with longer lengths of stay, and higher associated direct hospitalization cost (p < 0.001) and lower rates of home disposition (p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: High initial lactate levels are independently associated with post-operative morbidity as well as higher direct hospitalization costs and longer lengths of stay in orthopedic trauma patients who underwent fixation for fractures of the lower extremity long bones. Ballistic trauma patients had significantly higher lactate levels compared to the blunt cohort, and lactate was not independently associated with increased rates of post-operative morbidity in the ballistic cohort alone. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas del Fémur , Ácido Láctico , Tiempo de Internación , Fracturas de la Tibia , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Masculino , Femenino , Ácido Láctico/sangre , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fracturas de la Tibia/cirugía , Fracturas de la Tibia/economía , Fracturas del Fémur/cirugía , Fracturas del Fémur/economía , Heridas no Penetrantes/economía , Heridas no Penetrantes/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/economía , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/cirugía
17.
Am J Surg ; 234: 92-98, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38519401

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: As the first comprehensive investigation into hospital readmissions following robotic hepatectomy for neoplastic disease, this study aims to fill a critical knowledge gap by evaluating risk factors associated with readmission and their impact on survival and the financial burden. METHODS: The study analyzed a database of robotic hepatectomy patients, comparing readmitted and non-readmitted individuals post-operatively using 1:1 propensity score matching. Statistical methods included Chi-square, Mann-Whitney U, T-test, binomial logistic regression, and Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: Among 244 patients, 44 were readmitted within 90 days. Risk factors included hypertension (p â€‹= â€‹0.01), increased Child-Pugh score (p â€‹< â€‹0.01), and R1 margin status (p â€‹= â€‹0.05). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy correlated with lower readmission risk (p â€‹= â€‹0.045). Readmissions didn't significantly impact five-year survival (p â€‹= â€‹0.42) but increased fixed indirect hospital costs (p â€‹< â€‹0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Readmission post-robotic hepatectomy correlates with hypertension, higher Child-Pugh scores, and R1 margins. The use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated with a lower admission rate due to less diffuse liver disease in these patients. While not affecting survival, readmissions elevate healthcare costs.


Asunto(s)
Hepatectomía , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Readmisión del Paciente , Puntaje de Propensión , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Humanos , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Readmisión del Paciente/economía , Hepatectomía/economía , Hepatectomía/efectos adversos , Masculino , Femenino , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/economía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Hepáticas/economía , Anciano , Modelos Logísticos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/economía , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto
18.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 281(8): 4009-4019, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38528216

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the assumption that day-case cochlear implantation is associated with lower costs, compared to inpatient cochlear implantation, while maintaining equal quality of life (QoL) and hearing outcomes, for the Dutch healthcare setting. STUDY DESIGN: A single-center, non-blinded, randomized controlled trial in a tertiary referral center. METHODS: Thirty adult patients with post-lingual bilateral sensorineural hearing loss eligible for unilateral cochlear implantation surgery were randomly assigned to either the day-case or inpatient treatment group (i.e., one night admission). We performed an intention-to-treat evaluation of the difference of the total health care-related costs, hospital and out of hospital costs, between day-case and inpatient cochlear implantation, from a hospital and patient perspective over the course of one year. Audiometric outcomes, assessed using CVC scores, and QoL, assessed using the EQ-5D and HUI3 questionnaires, were taken into account. RESULTS: There were two drop-outs. The total health care-related costs were €41,828 in the inpatient group (n = 14) and €42,710 in the day-case group (n = 14). The mean postoperative hospital stay was 1.2 days (mean costs of €1,069) in the inpatient group and 0.7 days (mean costs of €701) for the day-case group. There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative hospital and out of hospital costs. The QoL at 2 months and 1 year postoperative, measured by the EQ-5D index value and HUI3 showed no statistically significant difference. The EQ-5D VAS score measured at 1 year postoperatively was statistically significantly higher in the inpatient group (84/100) than in the day-case group (65/100). There were no differences in postoperative complications, objective hearing outcomes, and number of postoperative hospital and out of hospital visits. CONCLUSION: A day-case approach to cochlear implant surgery does not result in a statistically significant reduction of health care-related costs compared to an inpatient approach and does not affect the surgical outcome (complications and objective hearing measurements), QoL, and postoperative course (number of postoperative hospital and out of hospital visits).


Asunto(s)
Implantación Coclear , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Implantación Coclear/economía , Implantación Coclear/métodos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Anciano , Pérdida Auditiva Sensorineural/cirugía , Pérdida Auditiva Sensorineural/economía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/economía , Hospitalización/economía , Países Bajos , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Análisis Costo-Beneficio
19.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 68(1): 100-107, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38331163

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To report the cost of target lesion revascularisation procedures (TLR) for femoropopliteal peripheral artery disease (PAD) following stenting, from a healthcare payer's perspective. METHODS: European multicentre study involving consecutive patients requiring femoropopliteal TLR (January 2017 - December 2021). The primary outcome was overall cost (euros) associated with a TLR procedure from presentation to discharge. Exact costs per constituent, clinical characteristics, and early outcomes were reported. RESULTS: This study included 482 TLR procedures (retrospectively, 13 hospitals, six countries): 56% were female, mean age was 75 ± 2 years, 61% were Rutherford class 5 or 6, 67% had Tosaka class 3 disease, and 16% had common femoral or iliac involvement. A total of 52% were hybrid procedures and 6% involved open surgery only. Technical success was 70%, 30 day mortality rate was 1%, and the 30 day major amputation rate was 4%. Most costs were for operating time during the TLR (healthcare professionals' salaries, indirect and estate costs), with a mean of: €21 917 ± €2 110 for all procedures; €23 337 ± €8 920 for open procedures; €12 903 ± €3 108 for endovascular procedures; and €22 806 ± €3 977 for hybrid procedures. In a regression analysis, procedure duration was the main parameter associated with higher overall TLR costs (coefficient, 2.77; standard error, 0.88; p < .001). The mean cost per operating minute of TLR (indirect, estate costs, all salaried staff present included) was €177 and the mean cost per night stay in hospital (outside intensive care unit) was €356. The mean cost per overnight intensive care unit stay (minimum of 8 hours per night) was €1 193. CONCLUSION: The main driver of the considerable peri-procedure costs associated with femoropopliteal TLR was procedure time.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Endovasculares , Arteria Femoral , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Arteria Poplítea , Stents , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Masculino , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/economía , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/cirugía , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/mortalidad , Arteria Femoral/cirugía , Arteria Poplítea/cirugía , Procedimientos Endovasculares/economía , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Stents/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Europa (Continente) , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Resultado del Tratamiento , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Constricción Patológica/economía
20.
Colorectal Dis ; 26(4): 692-701, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38353528

RESUMEN

AIM: Financial toxicity describes the financial burden and distress that patients experience due to medical treatment. Financial toxicity has yet to be characterized among patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) undergoing surgical management of their disease. This study investigated the risk of financial toxicity associated with undergoing surgery for IBD. METHODS: This study used a retrospective analysis using the National Inpatient Sample from 2015 to 2019. Adult patients who underwent IBD-related surgery were identified using the International Classification of Diseases (10th Revision) diagnostic and procedure codes and stratified into privately insured and uninsured groups. The primary outcome was risk of financial toxicity, defined as hospital admission charges that constituted 40% or more of patient's post-subsistence income. Secondary outcomes included total hospital admission cost and predictors of financial toxicity. RESULTS: The analytical cohort consisted of 6412 privately insured and 3694 uninsured patients. Overall median hospital charges were $21 628 (interquartile range $14 758-$35 386). Risk of financial toxicity was 86.5% among uninsured patients and 0% among insured patients. Predictors of financial toxicity included emergency admission, being in the lowest residential income quartile and having ulcerative colitis (compared to Crohn's disease). Additional predictors were being of Black race or male sex. CONCLUSION: Financial toxicity is a serious consequence of IBD-related surgery among uninsured patients. Given the pervasive nature of this consequence, future steps to support uninsured patients receiving surgery, in particular emergency surgery, related to their IBD are needed to protect this group from financial risk.


Asunto(s)
Precios de Hospital , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino , Pacientes no Asegurados , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Pacientes no Asegurados/estadística & datos numéricos , Precios de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/cirugía , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/economía , Colitis Ulcerosa/cirugía , Colitis Ulcerosa/economía , Costo de Enfermedad , Enfermedad de Crohn/cirugía , Enfermedad de Crohn/economía , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro de Salud/economía , Estrés Financiero/economía , Anciano , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA