Using Palliative Care Needs Rounds in the UK for care home staff and residents: an implementation science study.

Background: Care home residents often lack access to end-of-life care from specialist palliative care providers. Palliative Care Needs Rounds, developed and tested in Australia, is a novel approach to addressing this. Objective: To co-design and implement a scalable UK model of Needs Rounds. Design: A pragmatic implementation study using the integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services framework. Setting: Implementation was conducted in six case study sites (England, n = 4, and Scotland, n = 2) encompassing specialist palliative care service working with three to six care homes each. Participants: Phase 1: interviews (n = 28 care home staff, specialist palliative care staff, relatives, primary care, acute care and allied health practitioners) and four workshops (n = 43 care home staff, clinicians and managers from specialist palliative care teams and patient and public involvement and engagement representatives). Phase 2: interviews (n = 58 care home and specialist palliative care staff); family questionnaire (n = 13 relatives); staff questionnaire (n = 171 care home staff); quality of death/dying questionnaire (n = 81); patient and public involvement and engagement evaluation interviews (n = 11); fidelity assessment (n = 14 Needs Rounds recordings). Interventions: (1) Monthly hour-long discussions of residents' physical, psychosocial and spiritual needs, alongside case-based learning, (2) clinical work and (3) relative/multidisciplinary team meetings. Main outcome measures: A programme theory describing what works for whom under what circumstances with UK Needs Rounds. Secondary outcomes focus on health service use and cost effectiveness, quality of death and dying, care home staff confidence and capability, and the use of patient and public involvement and engagement. Data sources: Semistructured interviews and workshops with key stakeholders from the six sites; capability of adopting a palliative approach, quality of death and dying index, and Canadian Health Care Evaluation Project Lite questionnaires; recordings of Needs Rounds; care home data on resident demographics/health service use; assessments and interventions triggered by Needs Rounds; semistructured interviews with academic and patient and public involvement and engagement members. Results: The programme theory: while care home staff experience workforce challenges such as high turnover, variable skills and confidence, Needs Rounds can provide care home and specialist palliative care staff the opportunity to collaborate during a protected time, to plan for residents' last months of life. Needs Rounds build care home staff confidence and can strengthen relationships and trust, while harnessing services' complementary expertise. Needs Rounds strengthen understandings of dying, symptom management, advance/anticipatory care planning and communication. This can improve resident care, enabling residents to be cared for and die in their preferred place, and may benefit relatives by increasing their confidence in care quality. Limitations: COVID-19 restricted intervention and data collection. Due to an insufficient sample size, it was not possible to conduct a cost-benefit analysis of Needs Rounds or calculate the treatment effect or family perceptions of care. Conclusions: Our work suggests that Needs Rounds can improve the quality of life and death for care home residents, by enhancing staff skills and confidence, including symptom management, communications with general practitioners and relatives, and strengthen relationships between care home and specialist palliative care staff. Future work: Conduct analysis of costs-benefits and treatment effects. Engagement with commissioners and policy-makers could examine integration of Needs Rounds into care homes and primary care across the UK to ensure equitable access to specialist care. Study registration: This study is registered as ISRCTN15863801. Funding: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR128799) and is published in full in Health and Social Care Delivery Research; Vol. 12, No. 19. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

Care home residents often lack access to end-of-life care from hospice teams and so may experience distressing symptoms at end of life if care home staff cannot fully meet their needs. We examined how an approach which worked well in Australia called 'Palliative Care Needs Rounds' (or 'Needs Rounds') could be used in the United Kingdom. We interviewed 28 people (care home staff, hospice staff and other National Health Service/social care professionals in the community) about their understanding of the United Kingdom setting, what might help trigger change and what results they would want. We discussed these interviews at online workshops with 43 people, where we started to develop a theory of 'what would work, for whom, under what circumstances' and determine what United Kingdom Needs Rounds would look like. Six specialist palliative care services, each partnered with three to six local care homes, used Needs Rounds for a year. We collected information on care home residents, staff experiences of using Needs Rounds, relatives' perceptions of care quality, staff views of residents' quality of death, and on their ability to provide a palliative approach to residents. We found that Needs Rounds can provide care home staff and specialist palliative care staff the opportunity to work together during a protected time, to plan for residents' last months of life. Needs Rounds build care home staff confidence and can strengthen relationships and trust, while using each services' expertise. Needs Rounds strengthen understandings of dying, symptom management, advance/anticipatory care planning and communication between care home staff, families, specialist palliative care staff and primary care. This improves the quality of resident care, enabling residents to be cared for and die in their preferred place, and also benefits relatives by increasing their confidence in care quality.

Assessing the ripple effects of natural disasters on healthcare systems: a narrative review.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Natural disasters are on the rise, driven by shifts in climatic patterns largely attributed to human-induced climate change. This relentless march of climate change intensifies the frequency and severity of these disasters, heightening the vulnerability of communities and causing significant harm to both lives and socio-economic systems. Healthcare services are particularly strained during extreme weather events, with impacts felt not only on infrastructure but also on patient care. RECENT FINDINGS: This narrative review explored the overarching impact of natural disasters on healthcare infrastructure. We delved into how these disasters impact diverse health conditions, the healthcare systems of low and middle-income countries (LMICs), the psychological toll on both clinicians and survivors, and the ramifications for end-of-life care. SUMMARY: Natural disasters significantly impact healthcare, especially in LMICs due to their limited resources. Patients with cancer or chronic diseases struggle to access care following a natural disaster. Those in need for palliative care experience delay due to shortages in medical resources. Psychological consequences like posttraumatic stress disorder on disaster survivors and healthcare providers highlight the need for mental health support. Addressing challenges requires proactive disaster preparedness policies and urgent public policy initiatives are needed for optimal disaster response.

[Development plan for palliative care and end-of-life support 2021-2024]. / Plan de développement des soins palliatifs et accompagnement de la fin de vie 2021-2024.

DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR PALLIATIVE CARE AND END-OF-LIFE SUPPORT 2021-2024. The 5th national Plan on palliative and end-of-life care aims to ensure universal access to palliative care in France. It is based on three axes: communication on palliative care and appropriation of end-of-life rights by each citizen and by each health professional; training professionals and supporting research; deployment of local care, strengthening of coordination, early integration of palliative care.

PLAN DE DÉVELOPPEMENT DES SOINS PALLIATIFS ET ACCOMPAGNEMENT DE LA FIN DE VIE 2021-2024. Le 5e Plan national sur les soins palliatifs et la fin de vie a pour objectif d'assurer un accès universel aux soins palliatifs en France. Il se décline autour de trois axes : la communication sur les soins palliatifs et l'appropriation des droits de la fin de vie par chaque citoyen et par chaque professionnel de santé ; la formation des professionnels et le soutien de la recherche ; le déploiement des prises en charge de proximité, le renforcement des coordinations, l'intégration précoce des soins palliatifs.

[State of palliative care in France]. / État des lieux des soins palliatifs en France.

STATE OF PALLIATIVE CARE IN France. France is facing an epidemiological context marked by an increase in the number of elderly and very elderly people (often polypathological and dependent), and in the number of people suffering from serious or degenerative chronic illnesses. Considering people's needs and providing them with support in their last period of life has become more time-consuming, requiring appropriate care. The end-of-life trajectories of French people are heterogeneous, with a diversity of palliative and end-of-life trajectories coexisting, depending on their pathologies, personal situations, and frailties. This observation, combined with a legislative framework that has been evolving since the 90s to strengthen the rights of patients and their families, has prompted public authorities to reform end-of-life care provision, so that it is effective wherever the end of life takes place, and in line with societal expectations. A palliative care network is currently being set up at regional level and will be gradually extended to each region. Based on currently available data, the Centre National des Soins Palliatifs et de la Fin de Vie (National Center for Palliative and End-of-Life Care) has published an atlas to provide a better understanding of the evolution of end-of-life care provision and activity in France, the key figures of which are summarized in this article. This situation remains incomplete due to the lack of identification of trained professionals and the care procedures performed, especially at home. The government's current ambition to strengthen dedicated territorial organizations based on personalized care and support plans is a response to the present and future challenges of organizing palliative and end-oflife care in France.

ÉTAT DES LIEUX DES SOINS PALLIATIFS EN France. La France fait face à un contexte épidémiologique marqué par une augmentation du nombre de personnes âgées, voire très âgées (souvent polypathologiques et dépendantes), et de celui de personnes atteintes d'une maladie chronique grave ou dégénérative. La prise en compte des besoins des personnes et leur accompagnement pendant leur dernière période de vie devenue plus longue nécessite une prise en charge adaptée. Les parcours de fin de vie des Français sont hétérogènes, faisant coexister une diversité de trajectoires palliatives et de fin de vie en fonction de leurs pathologies, leur situation personnelle et leurs fragilités. Ce constat ainsi qu'un cadre législatif évoluant depuis les années 1990 vers un renforcement des droits des personnes malades et de leurs proches engagent les pouvoirs publics en direction d'une réforme de l'offre en soins de la fin de vie afin qu'elle soit effective quel que soit le lieu et en adéquation avec les attentes sociétales. Une filière de soins palliatifs est en cours de structuration au niveau régional et est amenée à se décliner de manière graduée à l'échelle de chaque territoire. Sur la base des données actuellement disponibles, le Centre national des soins palliatifs et de la fin de vie publie un atlas pour mieux comprendre l'évolution de l'offre et de l'activité en matière d'accompagnement de la fin de vie en France, dont une synthèse des chiffres clés est proposée dans cet article. Cet état des lieux reste incomplet par manque d'identification des professionnels formés ainsi que des actes de soins réalisés, et ceci est d'autant plus vrai au domicile. L'ambition gouvernementale actuelle d'aller notamment vers un renforcement des organisations territoriales dédiées qui s'appuient sur des plans personnalisés de soins d'accompagnement constitue une réponse aux défis d'aujourd'hui et de demain pour l'organisation des soins palliatifs et de la fin de vie en France.

Improving supportive, palliative and end of life care for teenagers and young adults with cancer in adult haematology services.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Adolescents with haematological malignancies within adult services, in the UK from 16 years old, have unique needs and require developmentally targeted services and approaches to care delivery. High-risk intensive treatments are common for this cohort and a better understanding of what individualised supportive and palliative care means in this context is required. RECENT FINDINGS: Being known and understood as an emerging adult, with particular recognition of developmental stage, is an essential component of quality measures and underpins the adolescent, and caregiver, experience when faced with an uncertain or poor cancer prognosis (UPCP). Healthcare professionals (HCPs) can experience increased emotional labour and feelings of professional inadequacy when caring for adolescents with UPCP. Therapeutic alliance improves HCPs understanding of optimum individualised care by improving communication and supported decision making. Access to training and support for HCPs is required to address the emotional impact of therapeutic alliance with teenage/adolescent and young adults (T/AYAs) with advanced cancer. SUMMARY: Investment in therapeutic alliance, alongside robust support mechanisms and targeted training, can improve the skills, confidence and wellbeing for HCPs, and can also ensure optimum individualised care for T/AYAs with UPCP. Evidence for optimum care for adolescents with advanced cancer is relatively scarce, especially for younger T/AYAs (16-24) in the UK who sit within adult services. Further evaluation of the impact of current UK expertise, services and programs are needed to inform future development.

Community Preferences for the Care of Older People at the End of Life: How Important is the Disease Context?

BACKGROUND: Population preferences for care at the end of life can inform palliative care policy and direction. Research investigating preferences for care at the end of life has focused predominantly on the context of advanced cancer, with relatively little attention to other life-limiting illnesses that are common causes of death. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate preferences for the care of older people at the end of life in three different disease contexts. The purpose was to understand if population preferences for care in the last 3 weeks of life would differ for patients dying from cancer, heart failure or dementia. METHODS: Three discrete choice experiments were conducted in Australia with a general population sample using similar methods but different end-of-life disease contexts. Some attributes were common across the three experiments and others differed to accommodate the specific disease context. Each survey was completed by a different panel sample aged ≥45 years (cancer, n = 1548; dementia, n = 1549; heart failure, n = 1003). Analysis was by separate mixed logit models. RESULTS: The most important attributes across all three surveys were costs to the patient and family, patient symptoms and informal carer stress. The probability of choosing an alternative was lowest (0.18-0.29) when any one of these attributes was at the least favourable level, holding other attributes constant across alternatives. The cancer survey explored symptoms more specifically and found patient anxiety with a higher relative importance score than the symptom attribute of pain. Dementia was the only context where most respondents preferred to not have a medical intervention to prolong life; the probability of choosing an alternative with a feeding tube was 0.40 (95% confidence interval 0.36-0.43). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests a need for affordable services that focus on improving patient and carer well-being irrespective of the location of care, and this message is consistent across different disease contexts, including cancer, heart failure and dementia. It also suggests some different considerations in the context of people dying from dementia where medical intervention to prolong life was less desirable.

Using routine databases to evaluate Electronic Palliative Care Co-ordination Systems (EPaCCS).

In response to the government's drive to expand Electronic Palliative Care Co-ordination Systems (EPaCCS) across England by 2020, further evidence for this intervention needs to be established quickly. With palliative and end-of-life care research being an underfunded area, the availability and lower costs of routine databases make it an attractive resource to integrate into studies evaluating EPaCCS without jeopardising research quality. This article describes how routine databases can be used to address the current paucity of high-quality evidence; they can be used in a range of study designs, including randomised controlled trials and quasi-experimental designs, and may also be able to contribute quality of life or patient-reported outcome measures.

Percepção de cuidados desproporcionais entre médicos seniores, médicos residentes, enfermeiros e técnicos de enfermagem em um centro de terapia intensiva / Perception of disproportionate care among staff physicians, training physicians, nurses, and practical nurses in an intensive care unit

Introdução: O aumento progressivo de medidas avançadas para manutenção da vida em pacientes com pouca expectativa de sobrevida gera percepção de cuidado desproporcional. Objetivamos averiguar a prevalência de cuidado desproporcional em equipe médica e enfermagem que atuam na Unidade de Terapia Intensiva (UTI) em um hospital público do Brasil.Métodos: Estudo transversal envolvendo equipe médica e enfermagem em uma UTI multidisciplinar de 34 leitos de um hospital terciário no sul do Brasil de janeiro a julho de 2019. Ao total 151 profissionais responderam a um questionário eletrônico anônimo.Resultados: A taxa de resposta foi de 49,5%. Cento e dezoito (78,1%) profissionais identificaram cuidado desproporcional no ambiente de trabalho. Enfermeiros e técnicos de enfermagem receberam menos treinamento formal em comunicação de fim de vida do que médicos (10,6% versus 57,6%, p < 0,001). Vinte e nove (28,1%) enfermeiros e técnicos de enfermagem e 4 (0,08%) médicos responderam que não havia discussão sobre terminalidade na UTI (p = 0,006). Quarenta e três (89,5%) médicos afirmaram que havia colaboração entre equipe médica e equipe de enfermagem, ao passo que 58 (56,3%) enfermeiros e técnicos de enfermagem discordaram da assertiva (p < 0,001).Conclusão: Este é o primeiro estudo sobre percepção de cuidado desproporcional conduzido na América Latina, envolvendo residentes e técnicos de enfermagem e um centro de alta complexidade do sistema público de saúde. A vasta maioria dos profissionais percebe a existência de cuidado desproporcional em sua prática diária, independentemente da classe profissional.

Introduction: The increased use of life-sustaining measures in patients with poor long- and middle-term expected survival concerns health care providers regarding disproportionate care. The objective of this study was to report the prevalence of perceived inappropriate care among intensive care unit (ICU) staff physicians, training physicians, nurses, and practical nurses in a Brazilian public hospital.Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study with the medical and nursing team of a 34-bed multidisciplinary ICU of a tertiary teaching hospital in Southern Brazil from January to July 2019. A total of 151 professionals completed an anonymous electronic survey. Results: The response rate was 49.5%. One hundred and eighteen (78.1%) respondents reported disproportionate care in the work environment. Nurses and practical nurses were less likely to receive formal training on end-of-life communication compared to physicians (10.6% vs. 57.6%, p < 0.001). Twenty-nine (28.1%) nurses and practical nurses vs. 4 (0.08%) physicians claimed that there were no palliative care deliberations in the ICU (p = 0.006). Of 48 senior and junior physicians, 43 (89.5%) believed that collaboration between physicians and nurses was good, whereas 58 out of 103 (56.3%) nurses and practical nurses disagreed (p < 0.001).Conclusion: This is the first survey on the perception of inappropriate care conducted in Latin America. The study included junior physicians and practical nurses working in a high-complexity medical center associated with the Brazilian public health system. Most health care providers perceived disproportionate care in their daily practice, regardless of their professional class.

Changing Pediatric Hospice and Palliative Care Through Medicaid Partnerships.

Since its inception in 2010, the Concurrent Care for Children Provision of the Affordable Care Act has enabled seriously ill pediatric patients and their families to access comprehensive, supportive hospice services while simultaneously receiving ongoing treatment-directed therapies. Although this groundbreaking federal legislation has resulted in improvements in care for vulnerable pediatric patients, the implementation of the law has varied from state to state through Medicaid programming. The pediatric professional community is called to consider how Medicaid services can more effectively be delivered by leveraging legislative mandates and collaborative relationships between clinicians, Medicaid administrators, and policy makers. In this article, we examine ways concurrent care has been executed in 3 different states and how key stakeholders in care for children with serious illness advocated to ensure effective implementation of the legislation. The lessons learned in working with state Medicaid programs are applicable to any advocacy issue impacting children and families .

Quality of end-of-life care of home-based care with or without palliative services for patients with advanced illnesses.

ABSTRACT: Palliative care has improved quality of end-of-life (EOL) care for patients with cancer, and these benefits may be extended to patients with other serious illnesses. EOL care quality for patients with home-based care is a critical problem for health care providers. We compare EOL quality care between patients with advanced illnesses receiving home-based care with and without palliative services.The medical records of deceased patients who received home-based care at a community teaching hospital in south Taiwan from January to December 2019 were collected retrospectively. We analyzed EOL care quality indicators during the last month of life.A total of 164 patients were included for analysis. Fifty-two (31.7%) received palliative services (HP group), and 112 (68.3%) did not receive palliative services (non-HP group). Regarding the quality indicators of EOL care, we discovered that a lower percentage of the HP group died in a hospital than did that of the non-HP group (34.6% vs 62.5%, P = .001) through univariate analysis. We found that the HP group had lower scores on the aggressiveness of EOL care than did the non-HP group (0.5 ±â€Š0.9 vs 1.0 ±â€Š1.0, P<.001). Furthermore, palliative services were a significant and negative factor of dying in a hospital after adjustment (OR = 0.13, 95%CI = 0.05-0.36, P < .001).For patients with advanced illnesses receiving home-based care, palliative services are associated with lower scores on the aggressiveness of EOL care and a reduced probability of dying in a hospital.

Burden of an educational program on end of life management in a Internal Medicine ward: a real life report.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Appropriate end of life (EOL) management in Internal Medicine wards is challanging. The aim of this study was to analyze the burden of an educational program on EOL management in a Internal Medicine ward. Materials and methods: We retrospectively analysed characteristics and management of patients consecutively died in an italian Internal Medicine ward along one year. We compared demographic, co-morbidity, pharmacological treatment in the last 48-hours of life and procedures during hospital stay in patients died six months before and after an educational program on palliative cares and EOL management addressed to a team of physicians and nurses. RESULTS: Study population was composed by 354 patients (190 females), with mean age ± DS 83.5 ± 10.6 years, one half admitted after the educational program. Eighty-four percent of deaths was exepected in the last 48 hours before exitus. Demographic characteristics and causes of hospitalization were not different before and after educational program. After the educational program the sharing of palliative care program with patient, relatives and/or caregivers (97.7% vs 85.8%, p=0.0001) and written order to withdrawal vital parameters relevation (39.5% vs 22%, p=0.0005) significantly increased, while difference in pharmacological classes prescribed in the last 48 hours of life was not find. Blood (54.8% vs 67.2%, p=0.0219) and arterial gas analysis (28.8% vs 39.5%, p=0.0435) samples in the last 48 hours of life were significantly reduced. Radiological and/or endoscopic examinations, red cells or platelets transfusion were reduced and palliative therapy was increased, despite difference between the two periods was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Educational program in Internal Medicine wards aimed to improve skills could contribute to make EOL management more appropriate and patient-oriented and it should be strongly encour-aged.

Intensity of end-of-life health care and mortality after systemic anti-cancer treatment in patients with advanced lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to study the mortality and intensity of health care in patients with advanced lung cancer who received systemic anti-cancer treatment (SACT) compared with patients who were not eligible for SACT (no-SACT). METHODS: A retrospective cohort of patients with lung cancer, who were treated at the North Estonia Medical Centre from 2015 to 2017, was linked to population-based health care data from the Estonian Health Insurance Fund. We calculated 14- and 30-day mortality after SACT and used a composite measure of intensity of care, comprised from the following: emergency department visit, admission to hospital, admission to intensive care unit, receipt of radiotherapy or systemic treatment. RESULTS: The median overall survival (OS) of patients who received at least one cycle of SACT (n = 489) was 9.1 months and in patients with no-SACT (n = 289) 1.3 months (hazard ratio [HR] = 4.23, 95% CI = 3.60-5.00). During the final 30 days of life, intensive EOL care was received by 69.9% of the SACT patients and 43.7% of the no-SACT patients. Intensive EOL care in the last 30 days of life is more probable among patients in the SACT group (odds ratio [OR] = 3.58, 95% CI = 2.54-5.04, p <  0.001), especially in those with a stage IV disease (OR = 1.89, 95% CI = 1.31-2.71, p = 0.001). In the SACT group 6.7 and 14.7% of patients died within 14 days and 30 days after the last cycle, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Significant proportion of patients with advanced lung cancer continue to receive intensive care near death. Our results reflect current patterns of EOL care for patients with lung cancer in Estonia. Availability of palliative care and hospice services must be increased to improve resource use and patient-oriented care.

Transitions during end-of-life care from the perspective of informal caregivers - A concept analysis using Rodgers' (2000) evolutionary approach.

PURPOSE: To produce a conceptual and operational definition of transition, in the context of end-of-life care, as experienced by informal caregivers. METHODS AND SAMPLE: The authors used Rodgers' (2000) concept analysis framework to examine this concept. FINDINGS: Common themes emerged using Rodgers' (2000) inductive approach confirming transition for informal caregivers at the end of life as a process comprising the presence of trigger(s)/event(s), awareness, instability and engagement/learning while maintaining normality. There was also duration to this process that was often unknown and unpredictable. This concept analysis provides useful insight into understanding the complex dynamics of transition during this period. The primary antecedent of this concept, prompting transition, is a diagnosis of non-curative disease for the patient. In some cases, a gradual realisation rather than a formal diagnosis that the illness has progressed to a non-curative stage, can also be an antecedent. CONCLUSION: Transition during end-of-life-care for informal caregivers can be a highly emotional time for this vulnerable cohort. Effective transitioning can ensure a stability and quality end-of-life outcomes, such as a peaceful death, as the awareness and learning that it brings, prompts planning actions for terminal care. Through recognising the findings of this concept analysis, deeper insight may be gained to support the provision of care, by nurses, to informal caregivers, prompting them towards effective transitions that foster the best interest of the patient.

A Review of Web-Based COVID-19 Resources for Palliative Care Clinicians, Patients, and Their Caregivers.

Palliative and end-of-life care has been pushed to the forefront of medical care during the pandemic caused by the coronavirus-2019 (COVID-19). Palliative care organizations have responded to the growing demand for the rapid dissemination of research, clinical guidance, and instructions for care to clinicians, patients with COVID-19, and their caregivers by creating COVID-19 resource Web pages. Here, end users can access resources that can be updated in real time. These Web pages, however, can be variable in what resources they offer and for whom they are designed for (clinicians, patients, caregivers). Therefore, this project was conducted to consolidate these resources via summary tables of specific contents available through each Web page grouped by palliative care domains (eg, care discussion and planning, communication, symptom management, care access) and to identify the target audience. This environmental scan was conducted by compiling a comprehensive list of COVID-19 resource Web pages of palliative care organizations generated by reviewing previously published research studies and consulting with palliative care research experts. Snowballing techniques were used to identify resource Web pages not captured in the initial scan. Two reviewers independently evaluated eligible Web pages for content via a form developed for the study, and Cohen κ statistic was calculated to ensure interrater reliability. The final κ statistic was 0.76. Of the 24 websites screened, 15 websites met our eligibility criteria. Among the eligible resource Web pages, most (n = 12, 80%) had specific target audiences and care settings, whereas the rest presented information targeted to all audiences. Although 11 Web pages offered resources that addressed all 4 domains, only 1 Web page conveyed all 12 subdomains. We recommend the use of this guide to all frontline clinicians who require guidance in clinically managing patients with COVID-19 receiving palliative care and/or end-of-life care.

Renal supportive care, palliative care and end-of-life care: Perceptions of similarities, differences and challenges across Australia and New Zealand.

Renal supportive care (RSC) is an approach integrating nephrology and palliative care to improve quality of life for people with chronic kidney disease (CKD). RSC practice varies across services; therefore, understanding clinicians' perspectives is important to the evolution and definition of RSC. AIM: To understand renal clinicians' views and experiences of RSC, palliative care and end-of-life care. METHOD: A cross-sectional online survey was undertaken across Australia and New Zealand between February and May 2018. Participants were asked about end-of-life care, RSC, palliative care and an ideal model of RSC. RESULTS: Estimated response rate 13% included 382 clinicians; doctors (32%), nurses (68%); of whom 84% access specialist palliative care and 59% RSC. A lack of agreed treatment goals (86%) and late or rushed treatment decision making (85%) was associated with challenging end-of-life experiences. Variable concepts of RSC were described, with RSC being considered the same as: usual care for all CKD patients (40%), conservative (30%) or palliative care (22%). The term RSC was generally distinct from (77%) and more acceptable than palliative care (80%) with preferential RSC referral for symptoms (86% vs 69%, P < .01) and complex treatment decision making (82% vs 58%, P < .01). Aspirations for RSC included improving symptoms and quality of life (89%), with an ideal model comprising: symptom management (98%), improved nephrology and community service integration (96%) and clinician education (94%). CONCLUSION: This study revealed challenges for renal clinicians in providing end-of-life care and variation of views and experiences of RSC. It represents opportunities to develop RSC aligned with clinician priorities to improve patient care.

Early-onset pancreatic cancer: an institutional series evaluating end-of-life care.

PURPOSE: Little is known about the use of palliative and hospice care and their impact on healthcare utilization near the end of life (EOL) in early-onset pancreatic cancer (EOPC). METHODS: Patients with EOPC (≤ 50 years) were identified using the institutional tumor registry for years 2011-2018, and demographic, clinical, and rates of referral to palliative and hospice services were obtained retrospectively. Predictors of healthcare utilization, defined as use of ≥ 1 emergency department (ED) visit or hospitalization within 30 days of death, place of death (non-hospital vs. hospital), and time from last chemotherapy administration prior to death, were assessed using descriptive, univariable, and multivariable analyses including chi-square and logistic regression models. RESULTS: A total of 112 patients with EOPC with a median age of 46 years (range, 29-50) were studied. Forty-four percent were female, 28% were Black, and 45% had metastatic disease. Fifty-seven percent received palliative care at a median of 7.8 weeks (range 0-265) following diagnosis. The median time between last chemotherapy and death was 7.9 weeks (range 0-102). Seventy-four percent used hospice services prior to death for a median of 15 days (range 0-241). Rate of healthcare utilization at the EOL was 74% in the overall population. Black race and late use of chemotherapy were independently associated with increase in ED visits/hospitalization and hospital place of death. CONCLUSIONS: Although we observed early referrals to palliative care among patients with newly diagnosed EOPC, short duration of hospice enrollment and rates of healthcare utilization prior to death were substantial.

GPs' perspective on End-of-Life Care - an evaluation based on the German version of the General Practice End of Life Care Index.

Objective: General practitioners (GPs) play a key role in the provision of general outpatient palliative care (AAPV) for the majority of patients at the end of life. The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of End-of-Life Care (EoLC) from a GPs' perspective using the German version of the General Practice End of Life Care Index (GP-EoLC-I). Methods: Between autumn 2018 and spring 2019, all registered and eligible GPs in two counties in Lower Saxony (n=190) were asked to participate in a survey on EoLC using the German version of the self-assessment questionnaire GP-EoLC-I. The index comprises two subscales: clinical care (13 items) and practice organisation (12 items). The summated index of both subscales measures the quality of EoLC by GPs (25 items; range 14-40). The questionnaire was supplemented by questions on sociodemographic data, indicators for good palliative care (PC) and requirements to improve PC. Quantitative data were analysed by descriptive statistics and free text answers by conventional content analysis according to Hsieh and Shannon. Results: 52 GPs (females: n=16) of 34 practices (single practices: n=26) participated in the study. The mean GP-EoLC-I was 27.5 (SD 4.5). The items revealed potential for improvement: systematic identification of patients with potential PC needs, multidisciplinary case conferences to discuss PC patients, application of care protocols and symptom assessment tools, documentation of patients' wishes and beliefs as well as inclusion of family and carers. Regarding the indicators for good PC, the most relevant indicators from the GPs' perspective were collaboration and coordination, integration of relatives, advance care planning and documentation. As requirements to improve PC, GPs highlighted further training and the use of standardised tools such as instruments to support the systematic identification of PC patients. Conclusions: To our knowledge for the first time in Germany, an internationally tested self-assessment questionnaire measuring the quality of EoLC by GPs was applied. The GP-EoLC-I in this study was slightly lower than the index of GPs in the United Kingdom. Including relatives and family carers, implementing tools to support early identification of PC patients and strengthening cooperation between GPs and other stakeholders in PC may be promising approaches to improve general PC and EoLC in Germany.

Current Status of Palliative and Terminal Care for Patients with Primary Malignant Brain Tumors in Japan.

Palliative care and advance care planning (ACP) from the first diagnosis of glioblastoma are important. This questionnaire survey was conducted to understand the current status of palliative care for brain tumors in Japan. Representative characteristics of Japan in comparison with Western countries (P <0.01) are described below: (1) Gender ratio of male in physicians who treat brain tumors in Europe and the United States/Canada are about 70%, but 94% in Japan. (2) The specialty is predominantly neurosurgeon (93%) in Japan. The ratio of neurologists is predominantly 40% in Europe. In the United States/Canada, neurologist (27%) and neurosurgeon (29%) are main parts. (3) Years of medical experience over 15 in physicians is 73% in Japan. Proportions of those with over 15 years are 45% in Europe and 30% in the United States/Canada. (4) In practicing setting, the rate of academic medical centers is about 80% in Europe and the United States/Canada, and ~60% in Japan. Representative differences compared with past domestic data (2007) (p<0.01): (1) In glioblastoma, the rate of explaining about median survival time increases from 39% (2007) to 80% (2018). Explanation about medical conditions to the patient himself with his family increases from 20% (2007) to 39% (2018). (2) Place of death: The rate at hospital is decreasing from 96% (2007) to 79% (2018) and at home is increasing from 3% (2007) to 10% (2018) (3) The rate of ventilator in adult has decreased from 74% (2007) to 54% (2018), but nasal tube feeding has remained unchanged from 62% (2007) to 60% (2018). These results will be shared with physicians to make better care systems for patients with brain tumors.