Purulent pericarditis caused by methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus bacteriuria.

BACKGROUND: Purulent pericarditis (PP)- a purulent infection involving the pericardial space-requires a high index of suspicion for diagnosis as it often lacks characteristic signs of pericarditis and carries a mortality rate as high as 40% even with treatment. Common risk factors include immunosuppression, diabetes mellitus, thoracic surgery, malignancy, and uremia. Most reported cases of PP occur in individuals with predisposing risk factors, such as immunosuppression, and result from more commonly observed preceding infections, such as pneumonia, osteomyelitis, and meningitis. We report a case of PP due to asymptomatic bacteriuria in a previously immunocompetent individual on a short course of high-dose steroids. CASE PRESENTATION: An 81-year-old male presented for severe epigastric pain that worsened with inspiration. He had been on high-dose prednisone for presumed inflammatory hip pain. History was notable for urinary retention requiring intermittent self-catheterization and asymptomatic bacteriuria and urinary tract infections due to methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA). During the index admission he was found to have a moderate pericardial effusion. Pericardial fluid cultures grew MSSA that had an identical antibiogram to that of the urine cultures. A diagnosis of purulent pericarditis was made. CONCLUSION: PP requires a high index of suspicion, especially in hosts with atypical risk factors. This is the second case of PP occurring as a result of asymptomatic MSSA bacteriuria. Through reporting this case we hope to highlight the importance of early recognition of PP and the clinical implications of asymptomatic MSSA bacteriuria in the setting of urinary instrumentation and steroid use.

Fluid retention-associated adverse events in patients treated with BCR::ABL1 inhibitors based on FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS): a retrospective pharmacovigilance study.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to conduct a thorough analysis of fluid retention-associated adverse events (AEs) associated with BCR::ABL inhibitors. DESIGN: A retrospective pharmacovigilance study. SETTING: Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database for BCR::ABL inhibitors was searched from 1 January 2004 to 30 September 2021. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Reporting OR (ROR) and 95% CI were used to detect the signals. ROR was calculated by dividing the odds of fluid retention event reporting for the target drug by the odds of fluid retention event reporting for all other drugs. The signal was considered positive if the lower limit of 95% CI of ROR was >1. The analysis was run only considering coupled fluid retention events/BCR::ABL inhibitors with at least three cases. RESULTS: A total of 97 823 reports were identified in FAERS. Imatinib had the most fluid retention signals, followed by dasatinib and nilotinib, while bosutinib and ponatinib had fewer signals. Periorbital oedema (ROR=24.931, 95% CI 22.404 to 27.743), chylothorax (ROR=161.427, 95% CI 125.835 to 207.085), nipple swelling (ROR=48.796, 95% CI 26.270 to 90.636), chylothorax (ROR=35.798, 95% CI 14.791 to 86.642) and gallbladder oedema (ROR=77.996, 95% CI 38.286 to 158.893) were the strongest signals detected for imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib, bosutinib and ponatinib, respectively. Pleural effusion, pericardial effusion and pulmonary oedema were detected for all BCR::ABL inhibitors, with dasatinib having the highest RORs for pleural effusion (ROR=37.424, 95% CI 35.715 to 39.216), pericardial effusion (ROR=14.146, 95% CI 12.649 to 15.819) and pulmonary oedema (ROR=11.217, 95% CI 10.303 to 12.213). Patients aged ≥65 years using dasatinib, imatinib, nilotinib or bosutinib had higher RORs for pleural effusion, pericardial effusion and pulmonary oedema. Patients aged ≥65 years and females using imatinib had higher RORs for periorbital oedema, generalised oedema and face oedema. CONCLUSIONS: This pharmacovigilance study serves as a clinical reminder to physicians to be more vigilant for fluid retention-associated AEs with BCR::ABL inhibitors.

Toxic Effects of Volume-modulated Arc Therapy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer: Preliminary Clinical Results.

BACKGROUND/AIM: To evaluate the toxic effects associated with various factors, including the presence or absence of concurrent chemotherapy with volume-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and dose parameters for esophageal cancer (EC), and to assess the safety and feasibility of the VMAT protocol. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with EC who received definitive VMAT between December 2016 and December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. VMAT plans were designed to deliver 60 Gy to the primary tumor, 54 Gy to high-risk sites, and 51.3 Gy to regional lymph node sites. Toxic effects were evaluated for esophagitis, neutropenia, esophageal stricture, pericardial effusion, radiation-associated pneumonia. RESULTS: Forty-five patients received concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), while 29 were treated with radiation therapy (RT) alone. The following grade 3 complications were detected: Neutropenia in four patients (5.4%), esophagitis in two (2.7%), and esophageal stricture in one (1.4%). Grade 4 or more complications were not observed. The median age of the CCRT group (67 years) was significantly lower than that of the RT-alone group (77 years) (p<0.0001). The incidence of esophagitis was significantly higher in the CCRT group (75.5%) than in the RT group (48.3%) (p=0.033). The univariate analysis identified increasing mean dose to the pericardium as a significant risk factor for pericardial effusion, and CCRT and performance status ≥1 as significant for radiation-associated pneumonia. These factors were not significant in the multivariate analysis. Neutropenia and esophageal stricture were not associated with any factor examined. CONCLUSION: VMAT alone and in CCRT performed with our protocol was safe and feasible in patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer.

Lenvatinib rechallenge in a patient with advanced thymic carcinoma: A case report.

Advanced thymic carcinomas have limited treatment options. Recently, lenvatinib was approved for advanced thymic carcinoma treatment. However, the clinical benefit of lenvatinib re-administration in patients with advanced thymic carcinoma who developed prior lenvatinib treatment resistance (lenvatinib rechallenge) remains unclear. Here, we present a case treated with lenvatinib rechallenge for advanced thymic carcinoma who was previously treated with lenvatinib as the second-line treatment followed by multiple cytotoxic agents. Disease control rapidly deteriorated after the eighth line of treatment because of uncontrollable right pleural and pericardial effusion, which required repeated thoracic and pericardial drainage. Shortly after lenvatinib re-administration, rapid pleural and pericardial effusion reduction was observed. Thereafter, the patient achieved sustained clinical response with good pleural and pericardial effusion control for approximately 7 months. Our case might suggest lenvatinib rechallenge as a treatment option for patients with advanced thymic carcinoma, especially those with poor pleural and pericardial effusion control.

PD-1/L1 inhibitors may increase the risk of pericardial disease in non-small-cell lung cancer patients: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Background: The advent of PD-1/L1 inhibitors has changed the landscape for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Meanwhile, the adverse events of PD-1/L1 inhibitors have been focused. Methods: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed and Embase databases and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception to February 2021. Results: 18 studies involving 11,394 patients with NSCLC were included. PD-1/L1 inhibitor monotherapy was associated (relative risk, 95% confidence interval) with an increased risk of pericardial effusion (2.72 [1.45-5.12]; p = 0.002) and cardiac tamponade (2.76 [1.15-6.62]; p = 0.023), whereas PD-1/L1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy did not increase the risk of pericardial effusion and cardiac tamponade (3.08 [0.93-10.21]; p = 0.066 and 3.27 [0.37-28.94]; p = 0.288, respectively). Conclusion: For patients with NSCLC, treatment with PD-1/L1 inhibitor monotherapy increases the risk of pericardial effusion and cardiac tamponade, but PD-1/L1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy do not.

In this study, the authors found that the incidence of pericardial effusion and cardiac tamponade in non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with PD-1/L1 inhibitors was 0.63% and 0.35%, respectively, and in chemotherapy was 0.07% and less than 0.01%, respectively. The authors found that PD-1/L1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy did not increase the risk of cardiac adverse events (AEs); however, the risk of cardiac AEs with PD-1/L1 inhibitor monotherapy should be considered, and the damage of pembrolizumab to the pericardium needs further attention. The mechanism of pericardial effusion and cardiac tamponade is not well understood, and pseudoprogression cannot be ruled out. Although the incidence of cardiac AEs is low, the prevention and management of immunotherapy should be paid attention to.

A method for intra-percardial PDT for malignant mesothelioma.

We describe a case of a 35-year-old patient with recurrent non-resectable pleural mesothelioma cT4N0M0 with a confirmed malignant pericardial effusion, threatening for cardiac tamponade. We performed and described our experience of intrapericardial photodynamic therapy which was well tolerated and with a good survival result. After 12 months of follow-up our patient showed no signs of pericardial effusion and in stable condition, keeping high level of quality of life. This clinical case is an example of the excellent palliative effect of photodynamic therapy together with concomitant immunotherapy.

The Efficacy of Corticosteroids, NSAIDs, and Colchicine in the Treatment of Pediatric Postoperative Pericardial Effusion.

The objective of this study is to investigate and compare the efficacy of corticosteroids, NSAIDs, and colchicine in treating postoperative pericardial effusion (PPE) following cardiac surgery in the pediatric setting, on the basis of available literature. To investigate and compare the efficacy of corticosteroids, NSAIDs, and colchicine in treating postoperative pericardial effusion (PPE) following cardiac surgery in the pediatric setting, on the basis of available literature. A systematic review was conducted by carrying out a database search in PubMed on April 20th, 2021. An English language filter was added, but no time restrictions were applied. Lack of pediatric literature prompted a broadening of the search to include adult literature. One pediatric and four adult studies were included, but the pediatric evidence was not found to be of satisfactory quality, and the findings of adult literature could not be readily generalized to the pediatric setting. No well-founded conclusions could be drawn regarding the efficacy of corticosteroids, NSAIDs, or colchicine in treating PPE, as a striking lack of evidence for their efficacy in the pediatric setting were revealed. A knowledge gap was found in the literature, indicating a need for good-quality randomized controlled trials to bridge this gap.

Efficacy of Short-Term Oral Prednisolone Treatment in the Management of Pericardial Effusion Following Pediatric Cardiac Surgery.

A standard treatment for pericardial effusion without cardiac tamponade after pediatric cardiac surgery has not been established. We evaluated the efficacy of short-term oral prednisolone administration, which is the initial treatment for postoperative pericardial effusion without cardiac tamponade at our institution. Between October 2008 and March 2020, 1429 pediatric cardiac surgeries were performed at our institution. 91 patients required postoperative treatment for pericardial effusion. 81 were treated with short-term oral prednisolone. Pericardial effusion was evaluated using serial echocardiography during diastole. Pericardial drainage was performed for patients with circumferential pericardial effusion with a maximum diameter of ≥ 10 mm or signs of cardiac tamponade. Short-term oral prednisolone treatment was administered to patients with circumferential pericardial effusion with a maximum diameter of < 10 mm or localized pericardial effusion with a maximum diameter of ≥ 5 mm. Patients with localized pericardial effusion with a maximum diameter of < 5 mm were observed. Prednisolone (2 mg/kg/day) was administered orally for 3 days, added as needed. Short-term oral prednisolone treatment was effective in 71 cases and 90% of patients were regarded as responders. The remaining patients were deemed non-responders who required pericardial drainage. Overall, 55 responders were deemed early responders whose pericardial effusion disappeared within 3 days. There were no cases of deaths, infections, or recurrence of pericardial effusion. The amount of drainage fluid on the day of surgery was higher in the non-responders. In conclusion, short-term oral prednisolone treatment is effective and safe for treating pericardial effusion without cardiac tamponade after pediatric cardiac surgery.

The Efficacy, Safety, and Side Effects of Intrapericardial Triamcinolone Treatment in Children with Post-surgical Pericardial Effusion: A Case Series.

Intrapericardial triamcinolone can be used to treat chronic pericardial effusion (PE) in adults; however, pediatric data are lacking. In this case series we aim to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and side effects of intrapericardial triamcinolone in children with PE. The incidence and treatment of post-surgical PE from 2009 to 2019 were determined using the institutional surgical database and electronic patient records. Furthermore, a retrospective analysis of efficacy, safety, and side effects of intrapericardial triamcinolone treatment for chronic post-surgical PE was performed. The incidence of postoperative PE requiring treatment was highest after atrial septal defect (ASD) closure when compared to other types of cardiac surgery (9.7% vs 4.3%). Intrapericardial treatment with triamcinolone resolved pericardial effusion in 3 out of 4 patients. All patients developed significant systemic side effects. Surgical ASD closure is associated with an increased risk of development of PE requiring treatment. Intrapericardial triamcinolone is an effective treatment for chronic postoperative PE in children, but is always associated with significant systemic side effects. Close monitoring and treatment of adrenal insufficiency are mandatory in these cases.

Post-cardiac injury syndrome triggered by radiofrequency ablation for AVNRT.

BACKGROUND: Post-cardiac injury syndrome (PCIS) is an inflammatory condition following myocardial or pericardial damage. In response to catheter ablation, PCIS most frequently occurs after extensive radiofrequency (RF) ablation of large areas of atrial myocardium. Minor myocardial injury from right septal slow pathway ablation for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is not an established cause of the syndrome. CASE PRESENTATION: A 62-year-old women with a 6-year history of symptomatic narrow-complex tachycardia was referred to perform an electrophysiological study. During the procedure AVNRT was recorded and a total of two RF burns were applied to the region between the coronary sinus and the tricuspid annulus. Pericardial effusion was routinely ruled out by focused cardiac ultrasound. In the following days, the patient developed fever, elevated inflammatory and cardiac markers, new-onset pericardial effusion, characteristic ECG changes, and complained of pleuritic chest pain. An extensive workup for infectious, metabolic, rheumatologic, neoplastic, and toxic causes of pericarditis and myocarditis was unremarkable. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging showed no signs of ischemia, infiltrative disease or structural abnormalities. The patient was diagnosed with PCIS and initiated on aspirin and low-dose colchicine. At a 1-month follow-up visit the patient was free of symptoms but still had a small pericardial effusion. After three  months of treatment the pericardial effusion had resolved completely. CONCLUSIONS: Inflammatory pericardial reactions can occur after minor myocardial damage from RF ablation without involvement of structures in close proximity to the pericardium.

Post cardiac injury syndrome successfully treated with medications: a report of two cases.

BACKGROUND: Post cardiac injury syndrome (PCIS) is induced by myocardial infarction or cardiac surgery, as well as minor insults to the heart such as percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), or insertion of a pacing lead. PCIS is characterized by pericarditis after injury to the heart. The relatively low incidence makes differential diagnosis of PCIS after PCI or implantation of a pacemaker a challenge. This report describes two typical cases of PCIS. CASE PRESENTATION: The first patient presented with signs of progressive cardiac tamponade that occurred two weeks after implantation of a permanent pacemaker. Echocardiography confirmed the presence of a moderate amount of newly-formed pericardial effusion. The second patient underwent PCI for the right coronary artery. However, despite an uneventful procedure, the patient experienced dyspnea, tightness of chest and cold sweats, and bradycardia two hours after the procedure. Echocardiography findings, which showed a moderate amount of newly-formed pericardial effusion, suggested acute cardiac tamponade, and compromised hemodynamics. Both patients recovered with medication. CONCLUSION: These cases illustrated that PCIS can occur after minor myocardial injury, and that the possibility of PCIS should be considered if there is a history of possible cardiac insult.

Empirical anti-tuberculous therapy for the massive pericardial effusion of unknown etiology.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of empirical anti-tuberculous therapy (ATT) in patients with massive pericardial effusion (MPE) of unknown etiology in China. METHODS: In-hospital patients with MPE were assessed retrospectively. Based on thorough examination excluding neoplastic, autoimmune, and non-tuberculous infectious diseases, patients who had no evidence of tuberculosis (TB) were treated with empirical ATT (Group A) or not treated with empirical ATT (Group C), whereas those who had evidence of TB were treated with standard ATT (Group B). Clinical outcomes and mitigation of MPE were compared among the three groups to identify the effectiveness of ATT. The survival free of composite endpoint was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: A total of 185 eligible patients were recruited: 77 in Group A, 80 in Group B, and 28 in Group C. The average follow-up was 52.9 ± 30.7, 49.4 ± 29.7, and 51.8 ± 30.2 months for Groups A, B, and C, respectively. The incidence of composite endpoint was 23.3, 24.4, and 85.7% in Groups A, B, and C, respectively (p < .0001). However, the clinical recovery rate was greater in Group B compared with Group A (p = .027). No significant difference in the safety profile of ATT was noted between Groups A and B. MPE did not spontaneously decrease in 85.7% of patients in Group C. CONCLUSIONS: Empirical ATT should be considered in MPE of unknown etiology in countries with a high burden of TB.

Pericardial disease in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: There are limited data on the occurrence, associations and outcomes of pericardial effusions and pericarditis on or after treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). METHODS: This was a retrospective study at a single academic center that compared 2842 consecutive patients who received ICIs with 2699 age- and cancer-type matched patients with metastatic disease who did not receive ICI. A pericardial event was defined as a composite outcome of pericarditis and new or worsening moderate or large pericardial effusion. The endpoints were obtained through chart review and were blindly adjudicated. To identify risk factors associated with a pericardial event, we compared patients who developed an event on an ICI with patients treated with an ICI who did not develop a pericardial event. Cox proportional-hazard model and logistical regression analysis were performed to study the association between ICI use and pericardial disease as well as pericardial disease and mortality. An additional 6-week landmark analysis was performed to account for lead-time bias. RESULTS: There were 42 pericardial events in the patients treated with ICI (n=2842) over 193 days (IQR: 64-411), yielding an incidence rate of 1.57 events per 100 person-years. There was a more than fourfold increase in risk of pericarditis or a pericardial effusion among patients on an ICI compared with controls not treated with ICI after adjusting for potential confounders (HR 4.37, 95% CI 2.09 to 9.14, p<0.001). Patients who developed pericardial disease while on an ICI had a trend for increased all-cause mortality compared with patients who did not develop a pericardial event (HR 1.53, 95% CI 0.99 to 2.36, p=0.05). When comparing those who developed pericardial disease after ICI treatment with those who did not, a higher dose of corticosteroid pre-ICI (>0.7 mg/kg prednisone) was associated with increased risk of pericardial disease (HR 2.56, 95% CI 1.00 to 6.57, p=0.049). CONCLUSIONS: ICI use was associated with an increased risk of development of pericardial disease among patients with cancer and a pericardial event on an ICI was associated with a trend towards increase in mortality.

Tegafur-uracil-induced pericardial effusion during adjuvant chemotherapy for resected lung adenocarcinoma: A case report.

In Japan, oral administration of tegafur-uracil is recommended as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for patients diagnosed with primary lung adenocarcinomas of >2 cm size and staged as IA, IB, and IIA. Reports on chemotherapy-induced pericardial effusion are rare. Herein, we report a rare case of tegafur-uracil-induced pericardial effusion during postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for primary lung cancer. A 60-year-old man underwent left lower lobectomy and mediastinal lymph node dissection for left lower lung adenocarcinoma. Lung cancer was staged as IB, and tegafur-uracil was administered as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy from 1 month after the surgery. A computed tomography (CT) scan revealed a pericardial effusion 5 months after the surgery. A malignant pericardial effusion was suspected, and tegafur-uracil was discontinued. Pericardiocentesis could not be performed owing to a small amount of pericardial effusion. An 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/CT scan revealed no abnormal FDG uptake. During a short follow-up period after discontinuation of tegafur-uracil, a CT scan revealed a decrease in pericardial effusion, suggesting that the pericardial effusion was induced by tegafur-uracil. Follow-up of pericardial effusion is required while administering tegafur-uracil. In cases of pericardial effusion without symptoms and no suspicious metastatic lesions in other organs, we should be concerned about tegafur-uracil-induced pericardial effusion.

Management of Lung Cancer-Associated Malignant Pericardial Effusion with Intrapericardial Administration of Carboplatin: A Retrospective Study.

It has been reported that 5.1-7.0% of acute pericarditis are carcinomatous pericarditis. Malignant pericardial effusion (MPE) can progress to cardiac tamponade, which is a life-threatening condition. The effectiveness and feasibility of intrapericardial instillation of carboplatin (CBDCA; 150 mg/body) have never been evaluated in patients with lung cancer, which is the most common cause of MPE. Therefore, we evaluated the effectiveness and feasibility of intrapericardial administration of CBDCA following catheter drainage in patients with lung cancer-associated MPE. In this retrospective study, 21 patients with symptomatic lung cancer-associated MPE, who were administered intrapericardial CBDCA (150 mg/body) at Gunma Prefectural Cancer Center between January 2005 and March 2018, were included. The patients' characteristics, response to treatment, and toxicity incidence were evaluated. Thirty days after the intrapericardial administration of CBDCA, MPE was controlled in 66.7% of the cases. The median survival period from the day of administration until death or last follow-up was 71 days (range: 10-2435 days). Grade 1-2 pain, nausea, fever, and neutropenia were noted after intrapericardial CBDCA administration. No treatment-related deaths were noted in the current study. Intrapericardial administration of CBDCA (150 mg/body) did not cause serious toxicity, and patients exhibited promising responses to lung cancer-associated MPE. Prospective studies using larger sample sizes are needed to explore the efficacy and safety of this treatment for managing lung cancer-associated MPE.

Responses to Treatment According to the Cytokine Profiles of Pericardial Effusion in Two Children with Idiopathic Pericarditis.

Acute pericarditis is inflammation of the pericardium with or without pericardial effusion. In the pediatric population, most patients with acute pericarditis are diagnosed with idiopathic pericarditis. Herein, we present two children with idiopathic pericarditis who underwent immunological assessment of pericardial effusion for the first time. Both patients showed equally high levels of interleukin-6 in the pericardial effusion. However, they had different treatment responses, in accordance with the pericardial effusion and serum interleukin-10 concentrations. Our present cases suggest that interleukin-10 may be associated with the response to anti-inflammatory therapy in idiopathic acute pericarditis.