A computer-aided, heterodimer-based "triadic" carrier-free drug delivery platform to mitigate multidrug resistance in lung cancer and enhance efficiency.

Co-delivering multiple drugs or circumventing the drug efflux mechanism can significantly decrease multidrug resistance (MDR), a major cause of cancer treatment failure. In this study, we designed and fabricated a universal "three-in-one" self-delivery system for synergistic cancer therapy using a computer-aided strategy. First, we engineered two glutathione (GSH)-responsive heterodimers, ERL-SS-CPT (erlotinib [ERL] linked with camptothecin [CPT] via a disulfide bond [SS]) and CPT-SS-ERI (CPT conjugated with erianin [ERI]), which serve as both cargo and carrier material. Next, molecular dynamics simulations indicated that multiple noncovalent molecular forces, including π-π stacking, hydrogen bonds, hydrophobic interactions, and sulfur bonds, drive the self-assembly process of these heterodimers. We then explored the universality of the heterodimers and developed a "triadic" drug delivery platform comprising 40 variants. Subsequently, we conducted case studies on docetaxel (DTX)-loaded ERL-SS-CPT nanoparticles (denoted as DTX@ERL-SS-CPT NPs) and curcumin (CUR)-loaded ERL-SS-CPT NPs (identified as CUR@CPT-SS-ERI NPs) to comprehensively investigate their self-assembly mechanism, physicochemical properties, storage stability, GSH-responsive drug release, cellular uptake, apoptosis effects, biocompatibility, and cytotoxicity. Both NPs exhibited well-defined spherical structures, high drug loading rates, and excellent storage stability. DTX@ERL-SS-CPT NPs exhibited the strongest cytotoxicity in A549 cells, following the order of DTX@ERL-SS-CPT NPs > ERL-SS-CPT NPs > CPT > DTX > ERL. Conversely, DTX@ERL-SS-CPT NPs showed negligible cytotoxicity in normal human bronchial epithelium cell line (BEAS-2B), indicating good biocompatibility and safety. Similar observations were made for CUR@CPT-SS-ERI NPs regarding biocompatibility and cytotoxicity. Upon endocytosis and encountering intracellular overexpressed GSH, the disulfide-bond linker is cleaved, resulting in the release of the versatile NPs into three parts. The spherical NPs enhance water solubility, reduce the required dosage of free drugs, and increase cellular drug accumulation while suppressing P-glycoprotein (P-gp) expression, leading to apoptosis. This work provides a computer-aided universal strategy-a heterodimer-based "triadic" drug delivery platform-to enhance anticancer efficiency while reducing multidrug resistance.

Docetaxel-tethered di-Carboxylic Acid Derivatised Fullerenes: A Promising Drug Delivery Approach for Breast Cancer.

Docetaxel (DTX) has become widely accepted as a first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer; however, the frequent development of resistance provides challenges in treating the disease.C60 fullerene introduces a unique molecular form of carbon, exhibiting attractive chemical and physical properties. Our study aimed to develop dicarboxylic acid-derivatized C60 fullerenes as a novel DTX delivery carrier. This study investigated the potential of water-soluble fullerenes to deliver the anti-cancer drug DTX through a hydrophilic linker. The synthesis was carried out using the Prato reaction. The spectroscopic analysis confirmed the successful conjugation of DTX molecules over fullerenes. The particle size of nanoconjugate was reported to be 122.13 ± 1.63 nm with a conjugation efficiency of 76.7 ± 0.14%. The designed conjugate offers pH-dependent release with significantly less plasma pH, ensuring maximum release at the target site. In-vitro cell viability studies demonstrated the enhanced cytotoxic nature of the developed nanoconjugate compared to DTX. These synthesized nanoscaffolds were highly compatible with erythrocytes, indicating the safer intravenous route administration. Pharmacokinetic studies confirmed the higher bioavailability (~ 6 times) and decreased drug clearance from the system vis-à-vis plain drug. The histological studies reveal that nanoconjugate-treated tumour cells exhibit similar morphology to normal cells. Therefore, it was concluded that this developed formulation would be a valuable option for clinical use.

Efficacy and safety of Anlotinib based neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced triple negative breast cancer (TNBC).

BACKGROUND: Anlotinib, an oral multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has shown the ability to inhibit tumor angiogenesis. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of anlotinib plus docetaxel, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (TEC) as a neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen for locally advanced TNBC. METHODS: Locally advanced TNBC patients who had received no prior systemic treatment were eligible for this study. The enrolled patients were scheduled to undergo six cycles of anlotinib (12 mg, d1-14, q3w) plus docetaxel (75 mg/m2, d1, q3w), epirubicin (75 mg/m2, d1, q3w) and cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2, d1, q3w) prior to surgery, unless there was disease progression or severe toxicity. The primary objective of this study was the safety of this therapeutic regimen, and the secondary objective was the tumor response. The safety of this regimen was assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03 and the efficacy of this treatment was measured using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. RESULTS: A total of 18 patients were included in this study. Participants completed an average of 5.56 neoadjuvant treatment cycles. The objective response rate (ORR) was 83.33%, and the disease control rate was 100%, respectively. The pCR was 55.6%. No patients discontinued therapy because of Adverse effects (AEs). Grade 3 or 4 AEs were observed in 5 cases (27.8%), with neutropenia and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome being the most common. CONCLUSIONS: Anlotinib combined with TEC as neoadjuvant therapy demonstrated manageable toxicity and promising antitumor activity for locally advanced TNBC. Further investigation of this combination regimen is warranted.

Effects of maternal taxane chemotherapy exposure on daughters' ovarian reserve and fertility potential.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the long-term effects of in utero taxane exposure on exposed daughters' ovarian reserve and reproductive potential. DESIGN: Pregnant dams were treated with a single, human-relevant animal-equivalent dose of saline, docetaxel, or paclitaxel at embryonic day 16.5. In utero-exposed daughters were aged to multiple postnatal time points for ovarian and endocrine analysis or were bred to assess fertility and fecundity. Granddaughters of treated dams were assessed also for ovarian follicle composition and atresia. SETTING: Laboratory study. ANIMALS: C57BL/6 mice. INTERVENTION(S): In utero exposure to saline, docetaxel, or paclitaxel. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Ovarian follicle composition, rates of follicle atresia, and rates of multioocyte follicles were analyzed in all exposure groups. Serum hormone levels and oocyte retrieval outcomes following ovarian hyperstimulation were also assessed. Finally, animals from all exposure groups were bred with the number of litters, pups per litter, live births, interlitter time interval, and age at the last litter analyzed. RESULT(S): We found that docetaxel and paclitaxel exposure in utero results in ovarian toxicity later in life, significantly affecting folliculogenesis as well as increasing the rate of follicular abnormalities, including follicle atresia and multioocyte follicles. Furthermore, viability staining indicates that the ovaries of daughters exposed to taxanes in utero demonstrate a significantly higher number of terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling-positive follicles. Hormone measurements also revealed that serum follicle-stimulating hormone concentration was significantly altered in taxane-exposed daughters, with the ratio of luteinizing hormone to follicle-stimulating hormone significantly elevated, specifically after paclitaxel exposure, coincident with the inability of these animals to properly respond to ovarian stimulation. Breeding studies over the course of a year also suggest that these taxane-exposed mice are fertile, although the duration of their fertility is shortened and they produce significantly fewer litters. Finally, ovarian effects are apparent in granddaughters of mice treated with docetaxel, suggesting persistent and multigenerational effects of taxane exposure. CONCLUSION(S): Our studies demonstrate that in utero exposure to taxane-based therapy during late gestation has a significant effect on the long-term reproductive health of exposed daughters (as well as their daughters) and will be instrumental in helping clinicians better understand which chemotherapies for maternal malignancy are least detrimental to a developing fetus.

Impact of taxanes after PD-1 blockade exposure in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) blockade improves survival in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, the efficacy of taxanes after exposure to PD-1 blockade remains unclear in patients with advanced ESCC. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical outcomes of advanced ESCC patients treated with taxanes (paclitaxel or docetaxel) with/without prior exposure to PD-1 blockade (Exposed /Naïve group) at National Cancer Center Hospital from June 2016 to December 2020. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients (Exposed group, n = 32; Naïve group, n = 67) were included. The objective response rate (ORR) of the Exposed group was significantly higher than that of the Naïve group (37.5% vs. 13.4%, p = 0.009). The median progression-free survival was similar between the Exposed and Naïve groups (3.8 vs. 2.8 months, HR 1.12, 95% CI 0.65-1.86, p = 0.66). PD-1 blockade exposure independently predicated higher ORR to taxanes in multivariate analysis. Grade ≥ 3 adverse events were comparable between the Exposed and Naïve groups (45.8% vs. 40.3%, p = 0.64). CONCLUSIONS: Taxanes following PD-1 blockade in advanced ESCC showed a higher ORR but similar PFS compared to taxanes without prior PD-1 exposure.

Docetaxel-Induced Cell Death Is Regulated by a Fatty Acid-Binding Protein 12-Slug-Survivin Pathway in Prostate Cancer Cells.

Chemotherapy is an important treatment option for advanced prostate cancer, especially for metastatic prostate cancer (PCa). Resistance to first-line chemotherapeutic drugs such as docetaxel often accompanies prostate cancer progression. Attempts to overcome resistance to docetaxel by combining docetaxel with other biological agents have been mostly unsuccessful. A better understanding of the mechanisms underlying docetaxel resistance may provide new avenues for the treatment of advanced PCa. We have previously found that the fatty acid-binding protein 12 (FABP12)-PPARγ pathway modulates lipid-related bioenergetics and PCa metastatic transformation through induction of Slug, a master driver of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Here, we report that the FABP12-Slug axis also underlies chemoresistance in PCa cells. Cell sensitivity to docetaxel is markedly suppressed in FABP12-expressing cells, along with induction of Survivin, a typical apoptosis inhibitor, and inhibition of cleaved PARP, a hallmark of programmed cell death. Importantly, Slug depletion down-regulates Survivin and restores cell sensitivity to docetaxel in FABP12-expressing cells. Finally, we also show that high levels of Survivin are associated with poor prognosis in PCa patients, with FABP12 status determining its prognostic significance. Our research identifies a FABP12-Slug-Survivin pathway driving docetaxel resistance in PCa cells, suggesting that targeting FABP12 may be a precision approach to improve chemodrug efficacy and curb metastatic progression in PCa.

MiR-140-3p Improves Sensitivity to Docetaxel by Suppressing PD-L1/ABCG2/MVP Expression in Lung Adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) or lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) accounts for the majority of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and overexpression of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) in these cells is known to induce tumor immune evasion or drug resistance. However, detailed studies are needed to determine whether microRNAs (miRNAs) that reduce PD-L1 expression can suppress drug resistance in NSCLC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Kaplan Meier plotter and Receiver Operating Characteristic plotter were used to determine the effect of specific miRNAs on survival and chemotherapy response in NSCLC patients. Cell viability, colony formation and invasion assays, and qPCR analyses were also performed. RESULTS: The expression of miRNA-140-3p (miR-140-3p) was lower in LUAD patients, compared to the normal group, and low expression of miR-140-3p was associated with poor survival of LUAD patients, but not in LUSC. The miR-140-3p mimic inhibited proliferation, colony formation, and invasion of LUAD cells. Interestingly, the expression of miR-140-3p was significantly lower in the group of LUAD patients who did not respond to docetaxel. In LUAD cells, combined treatment with miR-140-3p and docetaxel significantly reduced cell viability as well as the expression of ABCG2 and MVP, genes associated with drug resistance, compared to either treatment alone. Additionally, combined injection of miR-140-3p mimic and docetaxel significantly inhibited tumor growth compared to treatment with docetaxel alone. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the high expression of miR-140-3p in LUAD is correlated with good patient prognosis and may contribute to the treatment of LUAD, especially by increasing responsiveness to docetaxel.

Sequential [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 and docetaxel versus docetaxel in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (UpFrontPSMA): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 study.

BACKGROUND: Lutetium-177 [177Lu]Lu-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-617 improves survival and quality of life in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, but whether it confers a benefit in hormone-sensitive disease is unknown. We aimed to evaluate [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 before docetaxel treatment in patients with de-novo high-volume metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. METHODS: UpFrontPSMA was an investigator-initiated, multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial done at 11 Australian hospitals. Eligible patients had prostate adenocarcinoma without clinically significant neuroendocrine differentiation or small-cell histology, were aged 18 years or older, had less than 4 weeks on androgen deprivation therapy, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, and had high-volume PSMA-avid disease on [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET-CT with no major discordance on 2-[18F] fluorodeoxyglucose-PET-CT. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to the experimental treatment ([177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 followed 6 weeks later by docetaxel) or standard-of-care treatment (docetaxel alone) using computer-based block randomisation with random block sizes, stratified by disease volume by conventional imaging and duration of androgen deprivation therapy at the time of registration. Neither patients nor investigators were masked to treatment assignment. Patients in the experimental group received two cycles of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 7·5 GBq every 6 weeks intravenously, followed 6 weeks later by six cycles of docetaxel 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks intravenously, whereas patients in the standard-of-care treatment group received six cycles of docetaxel 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks intravenously. All patients received continuous androgen deprivation therapy. The primary endpoint was undetectable prostate-specific antigen (≤0·2 ng/mL) at 48 weeks, assessed using a modified intention-to-treat analysis. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04343885. FINDINGS: Between May 5, 2020, and April 18, 2023, 130 patients were randomly assigned, 63 (48%) to [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 plus docetaxel and 67 (52%) to docetaxel alone. All patients were male and no race or ethnicity data were collected. Median follow-up was 2·5 years (IQR 1·8-3·0). Four patients in the docetaxel alone group withdrew consent after randomisation and no data beyond screening were collected. An additional four patients were not evaluable for the primary endpoint at 48 weeks (two in each group). 25 (41%) of 61 patients (95% CI 30-54) in the [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 plus docetaxel group had undetectable PSA at 48 weeks compared with ten (16%) of 61 patients (9-28) in the docetaxel alone group (OR 3·88, 95% CI 1·61-9·38; p=0·0020). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were febrile neutropenia (seven [11%] of 63 patients in the [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 plus docetaxel group vs six [10%] of 63 patients in the docetaxel alone group) and diarrhoea (four [6%] of 63 patients vs none). Serious adverse events occurred in 16 (25%) patients in the [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 plus docetaxel group (none were definitely related to [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617) and 16 (25%) patients in the docetaxel alone group. No treatment-related deaths occurred. INTERPRETATION: [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 followed by docetaxel improved antitumour activity in patients with de-novo high-volume metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer compared with docetaxel alone, without increased toxic effects. Our data potentially support a role for [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. FUNDING: Prostate Cancer Research Alliance (Movember Foundation and Australian Government Medical Research Future Fund), US Department of Defence Impact Award-Clinical Trials, Endocyte/Advanced Accelerator Applications (a Novartis company), Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organization, Victorian Cancer Agency, University of Melbourne, and Peter MacCallum Cancer Foundation.

Outcomes of First Subsequent Taxane Therapy in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Who Previously Received Docetaxel Intensification for Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The management of advanced prostate cancer continues to evolve rapidly, particularly with the earlier use of survival-prolonging therapies in metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). Though approved prior to the use of intensification therapy in mCSPC, taxane-based chemotherapies remain a relevant option for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, there is little evidence determining the outcomes of taxane chemotherapies as the first subsequent taxane (FST) in mCRPC pts who received docetaxel intensification (DI) in mCSPC. The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes between the survival-prolonging taxanes, docetaxel and cabazitaxel as FST after DI. METHODS: New patient consults seen at the Cross Cancer Institute from 1 July 2014 to 31 December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Pts were considered eligible if they received DI for mCSPC and then received either docetaxel or cabazitaxel in mCRPC. Variables of interest were collected from electronic medical records. The primary endpoint was ≥50% PSA response at 12 weeks relative to baseline for FST. Secondary endpoints included OS from mCSPC diagnosis, as well as PFS and OS from the FST start date. PSA responses were compared using the chi-squared test, and time-based endpoints were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: In total, 34 pts were identified: docetaxel = 22 and cabazitaxel = 12 as FST. 91.2% of pts (docetaxel 95.5% vs. cabazitaxel 83.3%) received FST in 2nd line mCRPC. The median age at diagnosis (63.1 vs. 67.1 yrs, p = 0.236) and the median time to CRPC (18.6 vs. 14.2 mos, p = 0.079) were similar for docetaxel and cabazitaxel, respectively. The median time to FST (24.1 vs. 34.6 mos, p = 0.036) and OS from mCSPC diagnosis (30.9 vs. 52.7 mos, p = 0.002) were significantly shorter for pts receiving cabazitaxel vs. docetaxel. PSA responses occurred in 40.9% of pts treated with docetaxel compared to 25.0% treated with cabazitaxel (p = 0.645). There was no significant difference in median PFS (2.7 vs. 3.5 mos, p = 0.727) or median OS (11.4 vs. 8.1 mos, p = 0.132) from the time of FST for pts treated with docetaxel vs. cabazitaxel, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Both docetaxel and cabazitaxel demonstrated activity as FST after DI in mCSPC. Pts who received cabazitaxel had a shorter time to FST and OS from mCSPC. The reasons for this may reflect clinician preference for cabazitaxel in pts with aggressive or rapidly progressing disease. No difference was found in PSA response, PFS, or OS from FST with docetaxel compared to cabazitaxel. While limited by its retrospective nature and small sample size, this study suggests that docetaxel is active as FST despite treatment with DI in mCSPC.

Chemotherapy-Induced Alopecia by Docetaxel: Prevalence, Treatment and Prevention.

Docetaxel is a commonly used taxane chemotherapeutic agent in the treatment of a variety of cancers, including breast cancer, ovarian cancer, prostate cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, gastric cancer, and head and neck cancer. Docetaxel exerts its anti-cancer effects through inhibition of the cell cycle and induction of proapoptotic activity. However, docetaxel also impacts rapidly proliferating normal cells in the scalp hair follicles (HFs), rendering the HFs vulnerable to docetaxel-induced cell death and leading to chemotherapy-induced alopecia (CIA). In severe cases, docetaxel causes persistent or permanent CIA (pCIA) when hair does not grow back completely six months after chemotherapy cessation. Hair loss has severe negative impacts on patients' quality of life and may even compromise their compliance with treatment. This review discusses the notable prevalence of docetaxel-induced CIA and pCIA, as well as their prevention and management. At this moment, scalp cooling is the standard of care to prevent CIA. Treatment options to promote hair regrowth include but are not limited to minoxidil, photobiomodulation (PBMT), and platelet-rich plasma (PRP). In addition, a handful of current clinical trials are exploring additional agents to treat or prevent CIA. Research models of CIA, particularly ex vivo human scalp HF organ culture and in vivo mouse models with human scalp xenografts, will help expedite the translation of bench findings of CIA prevention and/or amelioration to the clinic.

Exosomal fragment enclosed polyamine-salt nano-complex for co-delivery of docetaxel and mir-34a exhibits higher cytotoxicity and apoptosis in breast cancer cells.

A novel core-shell nanocarrier system has been designed for co-delivery of a small anticancer drug, docetaxel (DTX) and tumor suppressor (TS) miR-34a named as Exo(PAN34a+DTX). The core is formed by pH dependent polyamine salt aggregates (PSA) containing both the payloads and the shell is formed by RAW 264.7 cell derived exosomal fragments. Herein, phosphate driven polyallylamine hydrochloride (PAH, MW:17,500 Da) PSA was formed in presence of miR-34a and DTX to form PAN34a+DTX. The formulation exhibited pH dependent DTX release with only 33.55 ± 2.12% DTX release at pH 7.2 and 75.21 ± 1.8% DTX release till 144 h at pH 5.5. At 1.21 molar ratio of phosphate to the amine (known as R value), efficient complexation of miR-34a (3.6 µM) in the PAN particles was obtained. PAN34a+DTX demonstrated particle size (163.86 ± 12.89 nm) and zeta-potential value of 17.53 ± 5.10 mV which upon exosomal fragment layering changed to - 7.23 ± 2.75 mV which is similar to the zeta-potential of the exosomal fragments, i.e., - 8.40 ± 1.79 mV. The final formulation Exo(PAN34a+DTX), loaded with 40 ng/mL DTX and 50 nM miR-34a exhibited 48.20 ± 4.59% cytotoxicity in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells, 4T1. Co-localization of CM-DiI (red fluorescence) stained exosomal fragments and FAM-siRNA (green fluorescence) in the cytoplasm of 4T1 cells after 6 h of Exo(PANFAM) treatment confirmed the efficiency of the designed system to co-deliver two actives. Exo(PAN34a+DTX) also reduced BCL-2 expression (target gene for miR-34a) by 8.98 folds in comparison to free DTX confirming promising co-delivery and apoptosis inducing effect of Exo(PAN34a+DTX) in 4T1.

Systemic treatments for advanced prostate cancer: relationship between health insurance plan and treatment costs.

OBJECTIVES: The high costs of cancer care can cause significant harm to patients and society. Prostate cancer, the leading nonskin malignancy in men, is responsible for the second-highest out-of-pocket (OOP) payments among all malignancies. Multiple first-line treatment options exist for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC); although their costs vary substantially, comparative effectiveness data are limited. There is little evidence of how gross payments made by insurers and OOP payments made by patients differ by treatment and health plan type and how these payment differences relate to utilization. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: We used IBM MarketScan databases from 2013-2019 to identify men with prostate cancer who initiated treatment with 1 of 6 drugs approved for first-line treatment of mCRPC. We calculated and compared gross and OOP payments and drug utilization across drug and insurance plan types. RESULTS: We identified 4298 patients who met our inclusion criteria. Insurer payments varied substantially by first-line therapy but were similar across different health plan types, except for docetaxel. OOP payments for a given first-line therapy, in contrast, varied by health plan type. Utilization of first-line therapies varied by plan type in unadjusted analyses, but not after adjusting for patient characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: The extent to which patient OOP payments for drugs reflect differences in gross payments made by insurers varies across health insurance plan types. However, even though OOP payments for the same treatment differ across plan types, treatment choice is not significantly different across type of health insurance after controlling for patient characteristics.

Identification of blood lipid markers of docetaxel treatment in prostate cancer patients.

Docetaxel is commonly used for treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer. Unfortunately, many prostate cancer patients develop resistance to docetaxel. Clinical markers less invasive than biopsies, such as blood samples, would be ideal for monitoring and predicting patient treatment outcomes to docetaxel. Lipid alterations are often associated with the progression of many cancers, including prostate cancer. This study investigated the use of lipids from whole blood as clinical markers for docetaxel resistance in a small cohort of patients with prostate cancer. Qualitative lipidomics was performed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry to assess the lipid composition of prostate cancer cells exposed to docetaxel as well as whole blood from prostate cancer patients before, during and after docetaxel treatment. Three patients had castration resistant prostate cancer, three had castration sensitive prostate cancer, and four had de novo prostate cancer during the extent of the study. Mean decrease accuracy and classical univariate receiving operating characteristic curve analyses were performed to identify potential biomarkers. In total, 245 and 221 altered lipids were identified from a second stage of mass spectrometry analysis of prostate cancer cells and clinical blood samples, respectively. Both models indicated that docetaxel treatment altered ether-linked phosphatidylcholines, lysophosphatidylcholine, diacylglycerols, ceramides, hexosylceramides, and sphingomyelins. The results also indicated several lipid changes were associated with sphingolipid signaling and metabolism, and glycerophospholipid metabolism. Collectively, these data suggest the potential usage of identified lipid species as indicators of docetaxel resistance in prostate cancer.

QL1701 (a proposed trastuzumab biosimilar) versus reference trastuzumab plus docetaxel as first-line therapy for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: a multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, parallel-controlled, phase III equivalence trial.

BACKGROUND: QL1701 is a proposed biosimilar to the reference trastuzumab (Herceptin®). This trial compared the efficacy and safety of QL1701 with the reference trastuzumab in first-line treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This randomized, double-blinded, parallel-controlled, phase III equivalence trial was conducted in 73 centers in China. Eligible patients with histologically or cytologically diagnosed HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer were randomly assigned (1 : 1) to receive either QL1701 or reference trastuzumab in combination with docetaxel (every 3 weeks) for eight cycles as the first-line treatment. Then, in patients with objective responses or stable disease, the QL1701 or reference trastuzumab with or without docetaxel was maintained for totally up to 12 months if tolerated. The primary endpoint was 24-week objective response rate (ORR) assessed by an independent review committee (IRC). The equivalence margin was 0.80-1.25 with a 90% confidence interval (CI) for the ORR ratio (QL1701 to reference trastuzumab). RESULTS: Between 29 April 2020 and 15 March 2022, 474 patients were randomized, and 473 received either QL1701 (n = 236) or reference trastuzumab (n = 237). The risk ratio for 24-week ORR was 1.07 (90% CI 0.94-1.21). The 90% CI fell within the pre-specified equivalence margin of 0.80-1.25. The 24-week ORR assessed by IRC was 59.7% (95% CI 53.2% to 66.1%) versus 56.1% (95% CI 49.5% to 62.5%) in QL1701 and the reference trastuzumab, respectively. As of 12 April 2023, there were no notable differences in progression-free survival (median: 8.3 versus 8.4 months) and overall survival (1-year rate: 95.1% versus 93.3%) between the two groups. Safety, pharmacokinetic (PK), and immunogenicity profiles were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSION: QL1701 demonstrated equivalent efficacy and similar safety to the reference trastuzumab when combined with docetaxel in the first-line treatment of patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, with similar PK and immunogenicity profiles.

Primary ovarian leiomyosarcoma: a case report.

Primary ovarian sarcoma is a rare malignancy, with primary ovarian leiomyosarcoma being even rarer because of the lack of smooth muscle in the ovaries. We herein report a case of primary ovarian leiomyosarcoma in a woman in her late 50s who presented with a 6-month history of abdominal pain. Imaging revealed a pelvic mass. The patient underwent surgery and was diagnosed with ovarian leiomyosarcoma. One month postoperatively, she began gemcitabine and docetaxel chemotherapy and continued this treatment for 6 months. Eight months postoperatively, however, recurrence was detected in the pelvic cavity. This case is reported with the aim of raising awareness about this rare disease.

Patient-reported outcomes in CodeBreaK 200: Sotorasib versus docetaxel for previously treated advanced NSCLC with KRAS G12C mutation.

BACKGROUND: In the CodeBreaK 200 phase III, open-label trial, sotorasib significantly improved efficacy versus docetaxel in previously treated KRAS G12C-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for global health status, physical functioning, dyspnea, and cough favored sotorasib over docetaxel. Here, we report sotorasib's additional impact on quality of life (QOL). METHODS: In CodeBreaK 200, 345 patients who had progressed after prior therapy received sotorasib (960 mg orally daily) or docetaxel (75 mg/m2 intravenously every 3 weeks). Validated questionnaires captured patients' perception of their QOL and symptom burden for key secondary and exploratory PRO endpoints, including the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and Quality-of-life Questionnaire Lung Cancer 13 (EORTC QLQ-LC13), question GP5 from the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Tool General Form (FACT-G GP5), PRO-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE), and 5-level EuroQOL-5 dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) including visual analog scale (EQ-5D VAS). Change from baseline to week 12 was assessed with generalized estimating equations for ordinal outcomes. RESULTS: Patients receiving sotorasib were less bothered by treatment side effects than those receiving docetaxel (odds ratio [OR] 5.7) and experienced symptoms at lower severity (pain: OR 2.9; aching muscles: OR 4.4; aching joints: OR 4.2; mouth or throat sores: OR 4.3). Further, patients' symptoms interfered less with usual/daily activities (pain: OR 3.2; aching muscles: OR 3.9; aching joints: OR 10.7). QOL remained stable with sotorasib but worsened with docetaxel (change from baseline in EQ-5D VAS score: 1.5 vs -8.4 at cycle 1 day 5 and 2.2 vs -5.8 at week 12). CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving sotorasib reported less severe symptoms than those receiving docetaxel. In addition to improving clinical efficacy outcomes, sotorasib maintained QOL versus docetaxel, suggesting sotorasib may be a more tolerable treatment option for patients with pretreated, KRAS G12C-mutated advanced NSCLC.

Plinabulin plus docetaxel versus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer after disease progression on platinum-based regimen (DUBLIN-3): a phase 3, international, multicentre, single-blind, parallel group, randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: There is an unmet need for second-line and third-line treatments that are effective and tolerable for advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with no driver mutations. METHODS: In this phase 3, international, multicentre, single-blind, parallel group, randomised controlled trial, we enrolled patients from 58 medical centres in Australia, China, and the USA. Eligible patients were adults with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) wild-type NSCLC who had progressed after first-line platinum-based therapy. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using an independent stratified randomisation schedule with a block size of four to receive intravenous docetaxel 75 mg/m2 on day 1 and either plinabulin (30 mg/m2) or placebo on days 1 and 8 in 21-day cycles until progression, unacceptable toxic effects, withdrawal, or death. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. Safety was analysed in all patients who had received at least one dose of study drug or placebo. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02504489) and is now closed. FINDINGS: Between Nov 30, 2015, and Jan 6, 2021, 919 patients were screened for inclusion. 360 patients were excluded, and 559 were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either docetaxel and plinabulin (n=278) or docetaxel and placebo (n=281). 406 (73%) of 559 patients were male, 153 (27%) were female, and 488 (87%) were Asian. Median OS was 10·5 months (95% CI 9·34-11·87) in the plinabulin group compared with 9·4 months (8·38-10·68) in the control group (stratified HR 0·82, 95% CI 0·68-0·99; p=0·0399). Mean OS was 15·08 months (13·42-16·74) in the plinabulin group compared with 12·77 months (11·45-14·10) in the placebo group using restricted mean survival time analysis (difference 2·31 months, 95% CI 0·18-4·44; p=0·0332). Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 273 (>99%) of 274 patients in the plinabulin group and 276 (99%) of 278 patients in the control group. Grade 3 or 4 gastrointestinal disorders occurred more frequently in the plinabulin group than in the placebo group, with the most frequent being diarrhoea (24 [9%] of 274 patients vs three [1%] of 278) and vomiting (six [2%] vs one [<1%]), as did transient grade 3 hypertension (50 [18%] vs eight [3%]). Treatment-emergent death was reported in 12 patients (4%) in the plinabulin group and ten patients (4%) in the placebo group. INTERPRETATION: Plinabulin plus docetaxel significantly improved OS as second-line and third-line treatment in patients with advanced or metastatic EGFR wild-type NSCLC and could be considered as a new treatment option in this population. FUNDING: BeyondSpring Pharmaceuticals.

Cancer-associated fibroblasts barrier breaking via TGF-ß blockade paved way for docetaxel micelles delivery to treat pancreatic cancer.

TGF-ß is a crucial regulator in tumor microenvironment (TME), especially for myofibroblastic cancer-associated fibroblasts (myCAFs). The myCAFs can be motivated by TGF-ß signaling to erect pro-tumor TME, meanwhile, myCAFs overexpress TGF-ß to mediate the crosstalk between tumor and stromal cells. The blockade of TGF-ß can break cancer-associated fibroblasts barrier, consequently opening the access for drugs into tumor. The TGF-ß is a promising target in anti-tumor therapy. Herein, we introduced a two-stage combination therapy (TC-Therapy), including TGF-ß receptor I inhibitor SB525334 (SB) and cytotoxicity agent docetaxel micelle (DTX-M). We found that SB and DTX-M synergistically inhibited myCAFs proliferation and elevated p53 protein expression in BxPC-3/3T3 mixed cells. Gene and protein tests demonstrated that SB cut off TGF-ß signaling via receptor blockade and it did not arouse TGF-ß legend compensated internal autocrine. On the contrary, two agents combined decreased TGF-ß secretion and inhibited myCAFs viability marked by α-SMA and FAPα. TC-Therapy was applied in BxPc-3/3T3 mixed tumor-bearing mice model. After TC-Therapy, the α-SMA+/ FAPα+ myCAFs faded increasingly and collagenous fibers mainly secreted by myCAFs decreased dramatically as well. More than that, the myCAFs barrier breaking helped to normalize micro-vessels and paved way for micelle penetration. The TGF-ß protein level of TC-Therapy in TME was much lower than that of simplex DTX-M, which might account for TME restoration. In conclusion, TGF-ß inhibitor acted as the pioneer before nano chemotherapeutic agents. The TC-Therapy of TGF-ß signaling inhibition and anti-tumor agent DTX-M is a promising regimen without arising metastasis risk to treat pancreatic cancer. The therapeutic regimen focused on TGF-ß related myCAFs reminds clinicians to have a comprehensive understanding of pancreatic cancer.

The efficacy of gemcitabine and docetaxel chemotherapy for the treatment of relapsed and refractory osteosarcoma: A systematic review and pre-clinical study.

INTRODUCTION: Osteosarcoma is the most common primary malignancy of the bone. There is a lack of effective treatments for patients who experience relapsed osteosarcoma. One treatment for relapsed patients is gemcitabine and docetaxel combination chemotherapy (GEMDOX). This systematic review aimed to establish the efficacy of this chemotherapy regimen, as well as identify the common severe toxicities that are associated with it. Resistant osteosarcoma cell lines developed from MG-63 and HOS-143B were used to represent relapsed osteosarcoma patients in a pre-clinical study. RESULTS: We identified 11 retrospective and Phase II studies that were suitable for inclusion in our review. 10.65% of patients had a response to gemcitabine and docetaxel combination therapy and the disease control rate was 35% (n = 197). 36%, 35.3% and 18.04% of patients experienced grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and anaemia respectively (n = 133). Male patients (X2 = 9.14, p < 0.05) and those below the age of 18 (X 2 = 10.94, p < 0.05) responded better to GEMDOX treatment than females and patients older than 18 years. The resistant osteosarcoma cell lines remained sensitive to either single-agent gemcitabine, docetaxel, and the combination of both. Cisplatin-resistant models (MG-63/CISR8 & HOS-143B/CISR8) were the most responsive to GEMDOX treatment compared to doxorubicin, methotrexate, and triple-combination resistant models. CONCLUSION: GEMDOX treatment has potential efficacy in relapsed osteosarcoma patients especially those with cisplatin resistance. To directly compare the efficacy of GEMDOX therapy against other therapies randomised phase III clinical trials with adequate patient follow up must be performed to improve treatment options for osteosarcoma.

Efficacy and safety evaluation of androgen deprivation therapy-based combinations for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: This systematic review and network meta-analysis aimed to assess the comparative effectiveness and safety profiles of current combination therapies based on androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for the heterogeneous population of individuals with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). METHODS: We retrieved pertinent literature from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and international conference databases. The study was registered in the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42023453853) for transparency. RESULTS: Our analysis included 20 RCTs involving 14,995 patients, evaluating 15 ADT-based combinations, including systemic therapies, radiotherapy and surgery. In the overall population, the darolutamide triplet (DARO + docetaxel + ADT) demonstrated comparable overall survival (OS) benefits to prostatectomy/radical local therapy (RLT) plus ADT (hazard ratio [HR], 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43-1.57). Additionally, the enzalutamide (ENZ) triplet (ENZ + DOC + ADT) appeared to confer the best progression-free survival (HR, 0.34; 95% CI: 0.27-0.43). Subgroup analysis based on metastatic burden indicated that RLT plus ADT had the best OS performance in patients with low burden, while the DARO triplet was associated with the best OS in patients with high burden. Regarding adverse events (AEs), the addition of certain androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) agents to ADT led to an increased incidence of severe AEs, while the addition of DOC to the ARPI doublet did not appear to elevate the exposure-adjusted incidence rates. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that combined treatments result in better survival outcomes than does ADT alone. In the current landscape of systemic therapy, the significance of local therapy should not be underestimated, and therapeutic decisions should be tailored with meticulous consideration of clinical heterogeneity among patients.