Report of endophthalmitis caused by Paradictyoarthrinium diffractum after plant trauma: A case involving left enucleation.

During outdoor work in April 2022, a 48-year-old man was stabbed by a tree branch and underwent intraocular foreign body extraction and repair of the scleral wound with sutures and amniotic membrane graft at a local hospital. Steroid therapy with prednisone was prescribed after a diagnosis of uveitis. Vitrectomy was performed in June 2023; a fungal culture was positive, and ITS sequencing identified the organism as Paradictyoarthrinium diffractum. Empiric antifungal therapy did not have an effect, and, because of deterioration of the condition, the left eye was enucleated in October 2023. P. diffractum is a mangrove host-specific saprophytic fungus that has not been reported in humans.

Surgical approach to endophthalmitis: an overview.

Endophthalmitis is one of the most severe ocular emergencies faced by ophthalmologists worldwide. Without prompt treatment significant visual loss is inevitable. With increased understanding of the science of endophthalmitis, recent studies have shown a clear role of early and more definitive surgery to achieve better visual and anatomic outcomes. Surgery in endophthalmitis encompasses a whole gamut of interventions. There are diagnostic procedures like anterior chamber tap and vitreous biopsy or therapeutic procedures like complete pars plana vitrectomy and retinal detachment repair. Current literature is deficient on a detailed description of the spectrum of surgical interventions in endophthalmitis. In the current communication, we summarize the studies based on various surgical interventions in endophthalmitis. We also elaborate in detail on each surgical maneuver, taking the reader through the nuances of each surgery via an exhaustive description and appropriate photos and surgical video clips.

Visual outcome of 25 Gauge vitrectomy for acute post operative infectious endophthalmitis.

BACKGROUND: The correlation between the change in foveal thickness measured using optical coherence tomography (OCT) following surgery for infectious endophthalmitis and preoperative and postoperative visual acuity is uncertain, and there are few pertinent studies on this topic. OBJECTIVE: We explored the variations in macular thickness using OCT after emergency vitrectomy for post-cataract infectious endophthalmitis and the relationship between macular thickness with changes in visual function. METHODS: We included 10 cases of post-cataract infectious endophthalmitis. Each patient underwent 25-G vitrectomy. RESULTS: The infection in all 10 patients was under control and visual function improved. Postoperative vitreous humor culture was positive in 8 patients, including 7 cases of coagulase-negative Staphylococcus epidermidis and 1 case of Lactobacillus acidophilus. The average age of these 10 patients was 71.60 ± 8.71 years (P< 0.05, two-tailed). There was no significant correlation between time 2 (the time of onset after cataract surgery) and visual prognosis. The average time 1 (the time of the vitrification surgery caused by the onset of the disease) was 1.45 ± 0.76 days (P< 0.05, two-tailed). The postoperative 3dVA ranged from 0.20 to 3.00, with an average visual acuity of 1.87 ± 1.12, which was superior to the preoperative value (P< 0.01, two-tailed). The correlation between the post3dVA and post 1mVA was significant. The post 1mVA ranged from 0.05 to 2.20, with an average visual acuity of 0.94 ± 0.74 (P< 0.05, two-tailed). The correlation between post 1mVA and post3mVA was significant. Also, paired t-tests comparing preoperative and postoperative visual acuity revealed a significant correlation (P< 0.05, two-tailed). The post3mVA was 0-1.00 with an average visual acuity of 0.44 ± 0.41. The postoperative foveal thickness ranged from 176.00 to 514.00 µm, with an average thickness of 281.10 ± 113.12 µm. CONCLUSION: Emergency 25-G minimally invasive vitrectomy can improve visual acuity and decrease the reoperation rate for patients who have acquired post-cataract infectious endophthalmitis. There were significant correlations between age, disease onset to operation time, preoperative and postoperative visual acuity, and postoperative macular thickness.

Challenging course of endophthalmitis with corneal ulcer following cataract surgery: successful management and visual rehabilitation / Caso desafiador de endoftalmite com úlcera corneal após cirurgia de catarata: manejo bem-sucedido e reabilitação visual

ABSTRACT The objective of this case report was to share the successful management of severe endophthalmitis, aiming at ocular integrity and visual acuity. A 73-year-old man presented with visual acuity of 20/30 in the right eye and 20/200 in the left eye. On the 21st day postoperatively after phacoemulsification in the left eye, he developed symptoms of endophthalmitis, including ocular discomfort, blurred vision, and whitish discharge. Despite negative cultures, his condition worsened, resulting in corneal perforation on the 31st day. Conjunctival flap and penetrating keratoplasty were performed. Currently, the patient maintains a visual acuity of 20/40 in the left eye, with a healthy graft and no signs of failure. Despite the complications, careful follow-up and timely interventions successfully preserved his vision. The use of conjunctival flap during the inflammatory phase was crucial to maintaining ocular integrity. This underscores the importance of different approaches in complex ocular complications, including alternative strategies for ocular protection during active inflammation.

RESUMO O objetivo deste relato de caso foi compartilhar o manejo bem-sucedido de uma grave endoftalmite, visando à integridade ocular e à acuidade visual. Um homem de 73 anos apresentou acuidade visual de 20/30 no olho direito e 20/200 no olho esquerdo. No 21° dia pós-operatório de facoemulsificação em olho esquerdo, ele desenvolveu sintomas de endoftalmite, incluindo desconforto ocular, visão embaçada e secreção esbranquiçada. Apesar de culturas negativas, sua condição piorou, resultando em perfuração corneal no 31° dia. A cobertura conjuntival e a ceratoplastia penetrante foram realizadas. Atualmente, o paciente mantém acuidade visual de 20/40 no olho esquerdo, com enxerto saudável e sem sinais de falha. Apesar das complicações, o acompanhamento cuidadoso e as intervenções oportunas preservaram a visão com sucesso. O uso de cobertura conjuntival durante a fase inflamatória foi crucial para manter a integridade ocular. Isso destaca a importância de diferentes abordagens em complicações oculares complexas, incluindo estratégias alternativas para proteção ocular durante a inflamação ativa.

Endogenous endophthalmitis caused by urinary tract infection: A case report.

RATIONALE: Endogenous endophthalmitis is a vision-threatening intraocular infection caused by hematogenous spread of infectious organisms from distant sites. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 71-year-old man with a history of fever and dysuria 5 days prior to presentation presented with sudden loss of vision in his left eye. The patient had no history of ocular surgery or trauma, and ocular examination revealed a large amount of exudative plaque covering the pupil. Therefore, fundus examination was not feasible. B-scan ultrasonography revealed a dome-shaped subretinal mass with an exudative retinal detachment. DIAGNOSIS: Endogenous endophthalmitis was diagnosed on the basis of these findings. INTERVENTIONS: The patient underwent pars plana vitrectomy and the early postoperative course was favorable. OUTCOMES: Vitreous cultures grew gram-negative bacilli, identified as Klebsiella pneumonia. Urinalysis revealed white blood cells (++) and urinary tract infection was the only identifiable risk factor for endogenous endophthalmitis. LESSONS: Urinary tract infection is an independent risk factor for endogenous endophthalmitis.

Pediatric Pars Planitis: A Review.

PURPOSE: To provide an overview of pediatric pars planitis. METHODS: Narrative literature review. RESULTS: Pars planitis refers to the idiopathic subset of intermediate uveitis in which there is vitritis along with snowball or snowbank formation occurring in the absence of an associated infection or systemic disease. It is thought to be a T-cell mediated disease with a genetic predisposition. Pars planitis accounts for 5-26.7% of pediatric uveitis cases. Presentation is commonly bilateral but asymmetric, often with insidious onset of floaters and blurred vision. Although pars planitis is known to be a benign form of uveitis in most cases, severe complications secondary to chronic inflammation may arise, with cystoid macular edema being the most common cause of visual morbidity. Mild vitritis in the absence of symptoms, vision loss, or macular edema may be observed. Patients with severe vitritis and/or associated vision-threatening complications require prompt aggressive treatment. A stepladder approach including corticosteroids, immunosuppressive agents, anti­tumor necrosis factor­alpha and pars plana vitrectomy and/or laser photocoagulation is the most commonly used method for treatment of pars planitis. CONCLUSION: Timely diagnosis and adequate treatment of pediatric pars planitis and associated complications are crucial in order to improve visual outcomes.

Double-flanged polypropylene technique: 5-year results.

PURPOSE: To assess the long-term (5-year) results and complications of the double-flanged polypropylene technique in patients with capsular tension segment fixation, nonfoldable intraocular lens (IOL) scleral fixation, and foldable IOL scleral fixation. SETTING: Santa Casa de Belo Horizonte and Centro Oftalmológico de Minas Gerais. DESIGN: Prospective case series. METHODS: Eyes that underwent treatment using the double-flanged polypropylene technique between September 2016 to September 2021 were included. LogMAR visual acuity was recorded, as well as complications such as long-term polypropylene resistance, conjunctival erosion, conjunctival inflammation, flange exposure, internalization, endophthalmitis, retinal detachment, and cystoid macular edema. RESULTS: 71 eyes of 61 patients were evaluated. The mean follow-up period for these eyes was 28.2 ± 14.3 (min: 4; max: 60; median: 26) months. 173 flanges were performed. 13 cases with sub-Tenon flanges (7.5%) were observed. 5 exposed flanges (2.89%), presented after a mean of 1.8 weeks postoperatively, were observed. 1 patient with large flanges presented with conjunctival inflammation and hyperemia. 2 late internalized flanges (1.1%) and 2 recently internalized flanges (1.1%) were observed. 3 eyes (4.22%) had retinal detachment. Moreover, cystoid macular edema was detected in 3 eyes (4.22%). No cases of endophthalmitis were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The double-flanged technique was proven to be stable when the correct technical procedure was followed. However, complications can be observed, especially with short scleral tunnels and in eyes where the flanges were not buried inside the sclera.

OUTCOMES OF RHEGMATOGENOUS RETINAL DETACHMENT REPAIR FOLLOWING INFECTIOUS ENDOPHTHALMITIS.

PURPOSE: To determine the incidence of and identify risk factors for redetachment in eyes that underwent rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair after infectious endophthalmitis. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of patients who had RRD surgery following a diagnosis of endophthalmitis from 2008 to 2021 at a tertiary referral center. Demographic and clinical characteristics as well as operative details were collected. Subjects with prior RRD, trauma, keratoprosthesis, or less than 3 months of postoperative follow-up were excluded. Univariate logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: Thirty-four eyes of 34 patients were included. Most subjects were male with a mean age of 60.1 years. Exogenous (58.8%) was more common than endogenous (41.2%) sources of endophthalmitis. Seventeen of 34 eyes (50.0%) experienced redetachment. Significant risk factors were infection with virulent organisms, hypotony, and postoperative proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Initial management with vitreous tap or vitrectomy, exogenous versus endogenous source, and surgical procedure were not associated with recurrent RRD. At the final follow-up, 32 of 34 eyes (91.2%) were attached, although more than one third of these had silicone oil. CONCLUSION: Redetachment occurred in half of eyes that underwent surgical repair of RRD after endophthalmitis. Early vitrectomy, with or without prior vitreous tap, was not associated with a higher risk of redetachment and improved the likelihood of a positive culture result. Culture data can aid in risk stratification because organism virulence was a risk factor for recurrent RRD. Although visual outcomes were generally poor, most retinas remained attached at the final visit.

IMMEDIATE VITRECTOMY vs TAP AND INJECT IN EYES WITH ACUTE POSTCATARACT ENDOPHTHALMITIS AND VISUAL ACUITY ≥HM: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes of immediate pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and tap and inject in eyes with postcataract surgery endophthalmitis. METHODS: Patients presenting with acute postcataract surgery endophthalmitis and visual acuity between ≥ hand movement and <6/18 were randomized to receive either PPV (Group A) or tap and inject (Group B). RESULTS: There were 26 and 31 eyes in Group A and Group B, respectively. The final mean visual acuity at 6 weeks [0.14 (Snellen equivalent 6/7.5) versus 0.22 (Snellen equivalent 6/9.5) LogMAR in Groups A and B, respectively; P = 0.2] was similar. However, eyes in Group A had significantly greater mean letter gain in vision compared with Group B (66.36 vs. 43.36, P = 0.02), and more eyes in Group A (88%) than in Group B (65%) attained a visual acuity of ≥ 6/18 ( P = 0.06). Eyes in Group B needed more reinterventions including delayed vitrectomy after tap and inject than those in Group A (39% vs. 8%; P = 0.09). On subgroup analysis, the mean visual acuity at the final follow-up was significantly better in the immediate PPV group compared with the delayed PPV group ( P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: PPV resulted in earlier recovery, lesser interventions, and greater change in visual acuity than tap and inject in eyes with postcataract surgery endophthalmitis presenting with visual acuity of ≥HM.

Refractory Choledocholithiasis Causing Endogenous Endophthalmitis: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND Endogenous bacterial endophthalmitis is caused by a breach of the blood-ocular barrier by pathogens originating from distant infective foci. Here, we report a case of endogenous endophthalmitis due to cholangitis complicated by common bile duct stones, which is a rare source of infection. CASE REPORT A 73-year-old man with type II diabetes mellitus underwent endoscopic choledocholithotripsy 20 years ago and laparoscopic cholecystectomy 18 years ago. He had choledocholith-related cholangitis 6, 5, and 1 years previously and 4 times in the last year and underwent endoscopic choledocholithotripsy each time. Three days after the last surgery, the patient developed right endogenous endophthalmitis and vitrectomy was performed. Four months later, the patient relapsed with cholangitis and required surgery for recurrent endophthalmitis. Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy was performed with curative intent, and the patient was followed up for 5 years without recurrence of choledocholith, cholangitis, or endophthalmitis. CONCLUSIONS The recommended treatment strategy for patients diagnosed with common bile duct stones or choledocholithiasis is stone extraction. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with endoscopic intervention is a widely accepted procedure. However, in cases of recurrent choledocholithiasis, the rate of recurrence increases and the interval between ERCP becomes shorter in proportion to the number of recurrences. In such intractable cases requiring numerous sessions of endoscopic stone removal, bypass Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy should be performed to prevent possible rare complications such as endogenous bacterial endophthalmitis.

27-GAUGE PARS PLANA/PLICATA VITRECTOMY FOR PEDIATRIC VITREORETINAL SURGERY.

PURPOSE: To report on the feasibility of 27-gauge (G) vitrectomy for pediatric patients. METHODS: This study is an international, multicenter, retrospective, interventional case series. Participants were patients 17 years or younger who underwent 27-G vitrectomy for various indications. RESULTS: The records of 56 eyes from 47 patients were reviewed. Mean age was 5.7 ± 5.2 years. Diagnoses included retinopathy of prematurity (Stages 3 with vitreous hemorrhage, 4A, 4B, and 5), Terson's syndrome, traumatic macular hole, posterior capsular opacification, endophthalmitis, and others. Instruments used were the 27-G infusion, 27-G vitreous cutter, 27-G light pipe, and 27-G internal limiting membrane forceps. Instrument bending was noted in one (1.8%) case. There were no cases with intraoperative complications, infusion issues, or postoperative endophthalmitis. There were 67/145 (46%) sclerotomies that required suturing, of which most (51/145) were sutured out of precaution. There were four cases (7.1%) that required conversion to a larger gauge and three cases (5.3%) that developed postoperative hypotony. Mean visual acuity improved from logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution 1.32 (20/420) to 0.72 (20/105), after a mean follow-up of 125.1 days (P = 0.01). Anatomic success was achieved in 96.4% of eyes after a single surgery. CONCLUSION: Twenty-seven-gauge vitrectomy was safe and feasible in selected pediatric vitreoretinopathies. Further studies are warranted to examine indications and outcomes.

Pars-plana-vitrectomy for endophthalmitis treatment and the role of standardized ultrasound.

PURPOSE: Endophthalmitis is a severe inflammation following surgery or endogenous spread of pathogens. Besides clinical signs and symptoms, standardized ultrasound might help to confirm the diagnosis. Thus, we analyzed 172 cases of endophthalmitis for pathogens, visual acuity (VA) and the predictive value of standardized ultrasound. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients treated with pars-plana-vitrectomy for endophthalmitis at the University Eye Hospital was performed. Sex, age, VA at presentation, first day after surgery, four weeks postoperatively, and at last follow-up, as well as pathogen culture, and presence of standardized ultrasound before vitrectomy were recorded. Mann-Whitney U and Chi-square tests were used for groupwise comparisons. RESULTS: A total of 172 patients (male = 47.7%) with a median age of 76 years (IQR 65-82 years) treated for endophthalmitis (exogenous = 85.5%) were included. Median follow-up time was 65 days (IQR 12-274 days). Visual acuity at presentation was 2.30 logMAR (IQR 2.70-2.30 logMAR); it increased to 1.00 logMAR (1.4-0.40 logMAR) at last follow-up. A total of 79 patients (45.9%) underwent standardized ultrasound before vitrectomy. Patients with positive ultrasound criteria had a significantly decreased VA at presentation (p = 0.034). Positive microbiological cultures for Streptococcus spp. and Enterococcus faecalis were associated with decreased VA (p = 0.028) at last follow-up. CONCLUSION: Standardized ultrasound is an easy and robust tool in the diagnosis of endophthalmitis. Positive criteria are significantly associated with decreased VA at presentation. The recovery of VA depends on pathogens and is significantly worse for certain species (Streptococcus spp., Enterococcus faecalis).

Risk factors for enucleation or evisceration in endophthalmitis.

PURPOSE: To identify clinical risk factors for enucleation or evisceration in patients with endophthalmitis at an academic institution. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients diagnosed with endophthalmitis at Wilmer Eye Institute from 2010 to 2019 was conducted. Clinical characteristics, including demographics, cause for endophthalmitis, microbial culture results, salvaging procedures and surgical intervention were recorded. In patients who underwent enucleation or evisceration, type of surgery and placement of a primary implant were recorded. Chi-squared, Student's t-tests and multivariate analysis were used to identify clinical factors that predicted enucleation or evisceration. RESULTS: Two hundred and fifty three patients treated for endophthalmitis over the study period were identified, of which 25 (9.88%) underwent enucleation or evisceration. Risk factors for enucleation or evisceration included poor presenting visual acuity (OR 7.86, CI: 2.26, 27.3), high presenting intraocular pressure (OR 1.07, CI: 1.03, 1.12), presence of relative afferent pupillary defect (OR 3.69, CI: 1.20, 11.37) and positive vitreous culture for methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (OR 18.3, CI: 1.54, 219.2) on multivariate analysis. Patients undergoing enucleation or evisceration were also more likely to have trauma, corneal ulcer or combined causes for endophthalmitis and underwent fewer salvaging surgical and procedural interventions. There were no significant differences in characteristics of those receiving enucleation versus evisceration in our cohort. CONCLUSION: Patients with endophthalmitis who underwent enucleation or evisceration had more severe disease on presentation compared to those treated with eye sparing therapy. Presenting clinical characteristics may have a role in triage and management decisions for patients presenting with severe endophthalmitis.

Combined Therapeutic Penetrating Keratoplasty and Pars Plana Vitrectomy for the Treatment of Infectious Keratitis Endophthalmitis: Mexican Endophthalmitis Study Group Protocol 4.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the role of combined surgical treatment of therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty and pars plana vitrectomy in the anatomical and functional outcome of infectious keratitis endophthalmitis. METHODS: This study reviewed the medical records of 4 participating centers in the United States and Mexico. This study included patients with a clinical diagnosis of infectious keratitis endophthalmitis who had been treated with an early therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty and pars plana vitrectomy as the main treatment for endophthalmitis. From each medical record, the study retrieved demographic data, relevant medical and drug history, baseline clinical manifestation of endophthalmitis, best-corrected visual acuity, and the need for enucleation/evisceration for the control of the infection or any other reason through the follow-up. RESULTS: The study included 48 patients (50.15 ± 20.6 years). The mean follow-up time was 13 ± 0.5 months. The mean best-corrected visual acuity at baseline was 2.1 ± 0.25 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution. At month 12 was 2.09 ± 0.61 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution ( P = 0.9). The overall prevalence of enucleation/evisceration was 8.3% (95% confidence interval: 2.32%-19.98%). The prevalence of a vision of no-light perception was 20.8% (95% confidence interval: 2.32%-19.98%). CONCLUSIONS: Combined surgery for severe cases of infectious keratitis endophthalmitis eradicates the infection in most cases, while significantly improving the overall outcomes.

Silicone oil tamponade in managing recalcitrant endophthalmitis after cataract surgery secondary to Clostridium intestinale.

A woman presented two weeks after uncomplicated cataract surgery with decreased visual acuity from endophthalmitis. One week after initial management with intravitreal antibiotics, her visual acuity decreased further, undergoing pars plana vitrectomy with intravitreal and intravenous antimicrobial coverage with preliminary improvement. Three days after vitrectomy, her vision decreased with recurrent inflammation. Initial cultures grew Clostridium intestinale She underwent repeat vitrectomy with silicone oil tamponade with no subsequent recurrence. The silicone oil was removed after 4 months and her visual acuity returned to 20/20 after 1 month and through 1 year of follow-up. Postoperative endophthalmitis is rare, with cases due to Clostridium species particularly destructive. In this first reported case of C. intestinale endophthalmitis, conventional management did not achieve lasting quiescence until silicone oil tamponade was employed. Pars plana vitrectomy with silicone oil tamponade should be considered in the management of recurrent endophthalmitis or endophthalmitis secondary to a recalcitrant microbe.

Early vitrectomy for exogenous endophthalmitis following surgery.

BACKGROUND: Endophthalmitis is a sight-threatening emergency that requires prompt diagnosis and treatment. The condition is characterised by purulent inflammation of the intraocular fluids caused by an infective agent. In exogenous endophthalmitis, the infective agent is foreign and typically introduced into the eye through intraocular surgery or open globe trauma. OBJECTIVES: To assess the potential role of combined pars plana vitrectomy and intravitreal antibiotics in the acute management of exogenous endophthalmitis, versus the standard of care, defined as vitreous tap and intravitreal antibiotics. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register; 2022, Issue 5); Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid Embase; the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number registry; ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. There were no restrictions to language or year of publication. The date of the search was 5 May 2022. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared pars plana vitrectomy and intravitreal injection of antibiotics versus intravitreal injection of antibiotics alone, for the immediate management of exogenous endophthalmitis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methods expected by Cochrane. Two review authors independently screened search results and extracted data. We considered the following outcomes: visual acuity improvement and change in visual acuity at three and six months; additional surgical procedures, including vitrectomy and cataract surgery, at any time during follow-up; quality of life and adverse effects. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach.  MAIN RESULTS: We identified a single RCT that met our inclusion criteria. The included RCT enrolled a total of 420 participants with clinical evidence of endophthalmitis, within six weeks of cataract surgery or secondary intraocular lens implantation. Participants were randomly assigned according to a 2 x 2 factorial design to either treatment with vitrectomy (VIT) or vitreous tap biopsy (TAP) and to treatment with or without systemic antibiotics. Twenty-four participants did not have a final follow-up: 12 died, five withdrew consent to be followed up, and seven were not willing to return for the visit.  The study did not report visual acuity according to the review's predefined outcomes. At three months, 41% of all participants achieved 20/40 or better visual acuity and 69% had 20/100 or better acuity. The study authors reported that there was no statistically significant difference in visual acuity between treatment groups (very low-certainty evidence). There was low-certainty evidence of a similar requirement for additional surgical procedures (risk ratio RR 0.90, 95% confidence interval 0.66 to 1.21). Adverse effects included: VIT group: dislocated intraocular lens (n = 2), macular infarction (n = 1). TAP group: expulsive haemorrhage (n = 1). Quality of life and mean change in visual acuity were not reported.  AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We identified a single RCT (published 27 years ago) for the role of early vitrectomy in exogenous endophthalmitis, which suggests that there may be no difference between groups (VIT vs TAP) for visual acuity at three or nine months' follow-up.   We are of the opinion that there is a clear need for more randomised studies comparing the role of primary vitrectomy in exogenous endophthalmitis. Moreover, since the original RCT study, there have been incremental changes in the surgical techniques with which vitrectomy is performed. Such advances are likely to influence the outcome of early vitrectomy in exogenous endophthalmitis.

Immediate Vitrectomy for Acute Endophthalmitis in Patients with a Visual Acuity of Hand Motion or Better.

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy of immediate pars plana vitrectomy as the primary treatment for acute endophthalmitis in patients with a visual acuity (VA) of hand motion (HM) or better. METHODS: A total of 149 patients who were referred to a single center for acute endophthalmitis after cataract surgery over the 13-year study period were retrospectively analyzed. Only patients presenting with a VA of at least HM were included. Patients were initially treated with either primary vitrectomy or intravitreal antibiotic injection alone, and their visual outcomes and reintervention rates after initial treatment were compared. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the proportion of good (final VA ≥20 / 40) and poor (VA ≤ counting finger) visual outcomes between the groups. However, subgroup analysis of patients with a VA of HM (92 eyes) showed that the incidence of reintervention (14 of 72 eyes [19.4%] vs. 9 of 20 eyes [45.0%]) and poor visual outcomes (10 of 72 eyes [13.9%] vs. 8 of 20 eyes [40.0%]) were lower after prompt vitrectomy than after intravitreal antibiotic injection alone (p = 0.019 and p = 0.022, respectively). For those with a VA of at least counting finger, no significant difference was observed between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with endophthalmitis presenting with a VA of HM, performing a prompt vitrectomy reduced the incidence of reintervention and poor visual outcomes than the administration of intravitreal antibiotics alone. Our results suggest that primary vitrectomy for patients with endophthalmitis presenting with a VA of HM could be more beneficial than intravitreal antibiotic injection alone.

[Keratoprostheses: Last Hope for the Most Severe Corneal Diseases]. / Keratoprothesen: letzte Hoffnung bei schwersten Hornhauterkrankungen.

Corneal blindness affects over 8 million adults and 1.5 million children worldwide, making it one of the top 5 causes of blindness. Depending on the recipient's corneal condition corneal transplantation may not be a viable treatment option. In such seemingly no-alternative situations, keratoprosthesis implantation can be an option in some patients. In terms of numbers, two types of keratoprostheses are currently used: 1. Keratoprostheses with biological haptics made of tooth or tibia bone. 2. The Boston type I-keratoprosthesis. Both types have optics made of PMMA. The most common complication is the formation of an optically disturbing retroprosthetic membrane behind the optic, which can usually be removed with YAG laser. Causes of blindness after keratoprosthesis implantation are glaucoma, endophthalmitis and retinal detachment. The extrusion rate of the Boston type I-keratoprosthesis seems to be higher than after keratoprosthesis implantation with biological haptic. Autoimmunological corneal diseases have increased extrusion rates and higher rates of endophthalmitis when compared to non-autoimmunological diseases. Visual outcomes after keratoprosthesis implantation are potentially very good and usually limited by extracorneal concomitant diseases. Advances in glaucoma diagnostic (OCT, implantation of intraocular pressure sensors), standard glaucoma prophylaxis by medication or surgery, modern retinal surgery and better treatment options in case of extrusion improve the prognosis of keratoprosthesis surgery. Still, the ideal technique for permanent anchoring of artifical optics in biological tissue has yet to be developed.

A Case of Post-cataract Surgery Endophthalmitis Successfully Treated with Conservative Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative endophthalmitis after cataract surgery often requires emergency surgery if caused by an infection. However, early reoperation after the surgery put a heavy mental burden on the patient. Here we report a relatively mild case of postoperative endophthalmitis in which emergency surgery was avoided through careful observation including gram stain and culture test. CASE: 87-year-old male. The patient had a sudden decrease in visual acuity on the 4th day after cataract surgery of the left eye performed at another hospital and visited his previous doctor on the following day. Postoperative endophthalmitis was suspected, so he was referred to our department on the same day. The inflammation was observed in the anterior segment of the left eye. The gram staining results for collected anterior aqueous humor were negative. The patient was followed up with continued medication and careful observation without undergoing emergency surgery. The inflammation of the anterior segment subsequently improved. The patient underwent a left vitrectomy three months later to remove residual vitreous opacity. CONCLUSION: Postoperative endophthalmitis after cataract surgery is often indicated for emergency surgery, but there can be cases in which conservative therapy with thorough observation succeeds in retaining visual function.