Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 25
Filtrar
1.
Dis Colon Rectum ; 65(3): 413-420, 2022 03 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33872283

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Low anterior resection syndrome has a negative impact on quality of life. Intestinal irrigation is a method of lavage consisting of a scheduled evacuation. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate functional and quality-of-life outcomes in patients with low anterior resection syndrome after transanal irrigation using a colostomy irrigation system. DESIGN: This was a prospective case series. SETTINGS: This study presents a single-center experience at a tertiary oncological center in an upper-middle-income country. PATIENTS: Patients classified as having minor or major low anterior resection syndrome 12 months after their operation were selected. INTERVENTIONS: Transanal irrigation was performed using an ostomy irrigation kit. Questionnaires assessing patients' bowel function (low anterior resection syndrome and Wexner score) and quality of life (Short Form-36 questionnaire) were applied before and after treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes were low anterior resection syndrome score and quality-of-life improvement after a 12-month treatment. RESULTS: Of the 22 patients included, 20 had major and 2 had minor low anterior resection syndrome, with a median score of 39, especially high rates of incontinence for liquid stool (21; 95.5%), clustering (21; 95.5%), and urgency (17; 77.3%). All patients successfully completed the 3-day training, and there were no complications during the treatment. After the 12-month period, the median score was 8, with 90% of the patients classified as having "no syndrome" and great improvement in all domains of this score. The most improved quality-of-life sections were patient vitality (p = 0.025) and physical (p = 0.002), social (p = 0.001), and emotional aspects (p = 0.001). LIMITATIONS: The study was limited by its small sample size and the limited follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: This study presents a safe implementation protocol of an ostomy irrigation device for transanal irrigation. It also adds to the literature that transanal irrigation is a safe, effective, and easily implemented procedure for patients with low anterior resection syndrome with a significant improvement in quality of life. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B563.ESTUDIO DE FACTIBILIDAD DE LA IRRIGACIÓN TRANSANAL UTILIZANDO EL SISTEMA DE IRRIGACIÓN PARA COLOSTOMÍA EN PACIENTES CON SÍNDROME DE RESECCIÓN ANTERIOR BAJAANTECEDENTES:El síndrome de resección anterior baja tiene un impacto negativo en la calidad de vida de los pacientes. La irrigación intestinal es un método de lavado que consiste en evacuaciones programadas.OBJETIVOS:Evaluar los resultados de la funcionalidad e impacto en la calidad de vida de los pacientes con síndrome de resección anterior y baja posterior a la irrigación transanal utilizando un sistema de irrigación de colostomía.DISEÑO:Es estudio prospectivo de una serie de casos.ESCENARIO:En este estudio se muestra la experiencia de un centro oncológico de tercer nivel en un país en vías de desarrollo.PACIENTES:Aquellos clasificados como síndrome con afección en menor o mayor grado doce meses después de la cirugía.METODO:Se efectuó irrigación transanal utilizando un equipo de irrigación de estomas. Se aplicaron cuestionarios para valorar la función intestinal de los pacientes (síndrome de resección anterior baja y la escala de Wexner) y para calidad de vida (Cuestionario Corto-36) antes y después del tratamiento.EVALUACION DE LOS RESULTADOS PRINCIPALES:Los principales resultados se obtuvieron de la escala del síndrome de resección baja y la mejoría en la calidad vida doce meses después de tratamiento.RESULTADOS:De los veintidós pacientes incluidos, veinte presentaron manifestaciones mayores del síndrome de resección baja y dos, manifestaciones menores. Con una media de treinta y nueve, se encontraron, especialmente, altos índices de incontinencia a líquidos (21; 95'5%) hiperdefecación "clustering" (21; 95'5%) y urgencia (17; 77'3%). Todos los pacientes completaron en forma satisfactoria el entrenamiento de tres días sin presentarse complicaciones durante el tratamiento. Al término del mes doce la media fue de ocho, con el 90% de los pacientes clasificados como "sin síndrome" y se observó una mejoría substancial en todos los puntos de la evaluación. Las secciones de calidad de vida que mostraron una mejoría significativa fueron: la vitalidad del paciente (p = 0'025), física (p = 0'002), social (p = 0'001) y emocional (p = 0'001).LIMITACIONES:El tamaño de la muestra es pequeño y el tiempo de seguimiento corto.CONCLUSIONES:Este estudio muestra la implementación de un protocolo seguro para la irrigación de estomas mediante un dispositivo transanal. Además contribuye con el concepto en la literatura de que la seguridad de la irrigación transanal es seguro, efectivo y facilmente reproducible para pacientes con síndrome de resección anterior baja con una mejoría significativa en la calidad de vida. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B563. (Traducción-Dr. Miguel Esquivel-Herrera).


Asunto(s)
Catéteres , Intestino Grueso/fisiopatología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Proctectomía/efectos adversos , Calidad de Vida , Enfermedades del Recto , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Irrigación Terapéutica , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/métodos , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante/métodos , Terapia Neoadyuvante/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/fisiopatología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/psicología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapia , Proctectomía/métodos , Enfermedades del Recto/etiología , Enfermedades del Recto/fisiopatología , Enfermedades del Recto/psicología , Enfermedades del Recto/terapia , Neoplasias del Recto/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias del Recto/radioterapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Irrigación Terapéutica/instrumentación , Irrigación Terapéutica/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
J Surg Oncol ; 122(5): 928-933, 2020 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32627198

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The impact of surgical indication on compliance with enhanced recovery program (ERP) and on outcomes has never been assessed. This study aims to assess the impact of surgical indication (malignant vs benign) on postoperative outcomes and ERP compliance. METHODS: A multicenter nationwide database was analyzed. Patients who underwent colorectal surgery for benign disease and those who underwent colorectal surgery for cancer were compared. Inclusion criteria were elective colorectal resection with anastomosis. ERP components, postoperative morbidity, and hospital length of hospital stay data were collected. RESULTS: Among the 6472 patients registered in the database between October 2012 and June 2018, 4528 patients were included; 2647 in the malignant group and 1881 in the benign group. The ERP compliance over 70% was not different between groups. Postoperative morbidity rate was higher in the malignant group (22.5% vs 19.3%; P = .009) but not confirmed in multivariate analysis. Patients in the malignant group were more often readmitted after discharge, 6.6% vs 4.6% (P = .004). The mean LOS was 6.3 ± 5.0 days in the malignant group and 5.4 ± 4.7 days in the benign group (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Indication for colorectal surgery did not significantly influence peri-operative management and postoperative major complications, in patients managed within an enhanced recovery program.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades del Colon/cirugía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Cooperación del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades del Recto/cirugía , Anciano , Enfermedades del Colon/psicología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/psicología , Cirugía Colorrectal/psicología , Cirugía Colorrectal/normas , Cirugía Colorrectal/estadística & datos numéricos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/normas , Recuperación Mejorada Después de la Cirugía , Femenino , Francia , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cooperación del Paciente/psicología , Enfermedades del Recto/psicología , Estudios Retrospectivos
3.
Colorectal Dis ; 22(1): 46-52, 2020 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31344293

RESUMEN

AIM: The low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) severely affects quality of life (QoL) after colorectal cancer surgery. There are no data about these complaints and the association with QoL in a reference population. The aim of this study was to assess LARS and the association with QoL in a reference population. METHODS: Six hundred patients who visited the outpatient clinic because of general or trauma surgical indications were asked to participate in this study. They received an invitation letter containing three validated questionnaires to assess LARS (assessed with the LARS score) and both general [European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30] and colorectal-specific (EORTC QLQ-CR29) QoL. RESULTS: Five hundred and one respondents could be included for the analyses. The median age at inclusion was 68 years and 47.3% were men. Major LARS was observed in 15% of patients (11.4% in men and 18.9% in women, P = 0.021). Women reported more urgency (P = 0.070) and incontinence for both flatus (P < 0.001) and stool (P = 0.063) compared to men. In univariate analyses, women reported major LARS significantly more often than men (OR 1.82; 95% CI 1.10-3.01). Patients with major LARS scored significantly worse in most QoL domains compared to patients with no/minor LARS. CONCLUSION: This is the first study demonstrating major LARS and the association with QoL in a reference population of patients without colorectal cancer. Our data can assist in the interpretation of LARS in past and future research about abdominal complaints after colorectal cancer surgery.


Asunto(s)
Colectomía/psicología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/psicología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Proctectomía/psicología , Calidad de Vida , Anciano , Canal Anal/fisiopatología , Canal Anal/cirugía , Colectomía/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/fisiopatología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Defecación , Incontinencia Fecal/epidemiología , Incontinencia Fecal/etiología , Incontinencia Fecal/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/psicología , Periodo Posoperatorio , Prevalencia , Proctectomía/efectos adversos , Enfermedades del Recto/epidemiología , Enfermedades del Recto/etiología , Enfermedades del Recto/psicología , Factores de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Síndrome
4.
Colorectal Dis ; 20(10): 881-887, 2018 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29679514

RESUMEN

AIM: The aim of this study was to validate the Dutch translation of the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score in a population of Dutch rectal cancer patients. METHOD: Patients who underwent surgery for rectal cancer received the LARS score questionnaire, a single quality of life (QoL) category question and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 questionnaire. A subgroup of patients received the LARS score twice to assess the test-retest reliability. RESULTS: A total of 165 patients were included in the analysis, identified in six Dutch centres. The response rate was 62.0%. The percentage of patients who reported 'major LARS' was 59.4%. There was a high proportion of patients with a perfect or moderate fit between the QoL category question and the LARS score, showing a good convergent validity. The LARS score was able to discriminate between patients with or without neoadjuvant radiotherapy (P = 0.003), between total and partial mesorectal excision (P = 0.008) and between age groups (P = 0.039). There was a statistically significant association between a higher LARS score and an impaired function on the global QoL subscale and the physical, role, emotional and social functioning subscales of the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. The test-retest reliability of the LARS score was good, with an interclass correlation coefficient of 0.79. CONCLUSION: The good psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the LARS score are comparable overall to the earlier validations in other countries. Therefore, the Dutch translation can be considered to be a valid tool for assessing LARS in Dutch rectal cancer patients.


Asunto(s)
Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Proctectomía/efectos adversos , Enfermedades del Recto/diagnóstico , Neoplasias del Recto/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/normas , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/psicología , Psicometría , Calidad de Vida , Enfermedades del Recto/etiología , Enfermedades del Recto/psicología , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Síndrome , Traducciones
5.
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) ; 27(2): e12815, 2018 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29419943

RESUMEN

Prolonged diagnostic intervals are associated with poorer outcomes, and the patient interval appears to be a substantial contributor to the overall length of the diagnostic interval. This study sought to understand how the broader context of people's lives influenced symptom appraisal and help-seeking, comparing experiences by length of the patient interval. Patients referred with a suspicion of lung or colorectal cancer were invited to complete a questionnaire about their symptoms, with 26 respondents purposively sampled to take part in a semi-structured interview about their patient intervals. Embodied experience, appraisal, help-seeking decision-making and consultation were identified as component stages of the patient interval, with the factors affecting movement between these stages located in one of four contextual domains: individual experience, interpersonal relationships, healthcare system interactions and social and temporal context. The length of the patient interval was related to the type of symptom(s) experienced, discussion of symptoms with others and the social responsibilities people held during symptomatic periods. A contextual model of the patient interval illustrates the stages and domains of this interval, as grounded in the data from this study. The model has potential application to future studies examining the patient interval for a range of symptoms.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades del Colon/psicología , Conducta de Búsqueda de Ayuda , Enfermedades Pulmonares/psicología , Enfermedades del Recto/psicología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Toma de Decisiones , Inglaterra , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/psicología , Percepción , Derivación y Consulta , Tiempo de Tratamiento
6.
Afr Health Sci ; 18(3): 612-622, 2018 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30602994

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES AND BACKGROUND: Hysterectomy is the most commonly performed major gynecological operation for both benign and malign gynecologic conditions. After hysterectomy, although some investigators have declared an increased incidence of urinary and anorectal dysfunction, some others could not show any connection. METHODS: The voluntary patients were divided in two groups: abdominal hysterectomy (Group 1) and vaginal hysterectomy (Group 2). Anal manometry and all the other examinations of the patients were performed at the Department of General Surgery Endoscopy Unit of Ankara University, Faculty of Medicine. RESULTS: When the quality of life of the patients was assessed before the operation and on the 12th post-operative month via the SF-36 form; it can be seen that body pain parameters of the patients in Group 1 had significantly improved and there is no statistical difference in other parameters. When the effect of hysterectomy on the quality of life of the patients was evaluated by the "Cleveland Clinic Global Quality of Life" form, the statistically significant improvement in the quality of life of the patients in Group 2 was observed. CONCLUSION: If the type of operation (vaginal or abdominal) is performed due to benign causes, it does not affect the urinary and anorectal functions of the patients. Depending on the decrease of complaints of the patients, it has a positive effect on the quality of life.


Asunto(s)
Canal Anal/fisiología , Enfermedades de los Genitales Femeninos/cirugía , Histerectomía Vaginal/métodos , Histerectomía/métodos , Calidad de Vida , Enfermedades del Recto/etiología , Enfermedades del Recto/psicología , Recto/fisiología , Adulto , Anciano , Canal Anal/fisiopatología , Femenino , Humanos , Histerectomía/efectos adversos , Histerectomía Vaginal/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Enfermedades del Recto/diagnóstico , Recto/fisiopatología
8.
Sex Transm Dis ; 44(7): 417-422, 2017 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28608791

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Repeat chlamydia detection after treatment is common, and there is concern that treatment failure may be a cause. METHODS: Within a randomized trial, we established a prospective cohort of 600 participants with anogenital chlamydia diagnoses (200 each of women, heterosexual men, and men who have sex with men [MSM]). Participants were invited for repeat testing at 3 months and to complete a behavioral survey at 4 months. Positive samples were analyzed for organism DNA load and genovar. We estimated repeat chlamydia positivity, reinfection and treatment failure rates, and investigated the biological and behavioral factors associated with a repeat positive test. RESULTS: A total of 290 participants (100 women, 89 heterosexual men, 101 MSM) were retested at 1 to 4 months, with 43 repeat positives, including 26 classed as reinfection and 9 as treatment failures. Comparing MSM with heterosexual men and women combined, repeat positivity was higher (20.8% vs 11.6%, P = 0.04), and treatment failure was higher (6.9% vs 1.1%, P = 0.01), but there was no difference in reinfection rates (11.9% vs 7.4%, P = 0.21). Among MSM, the odds of repeat positivity increased by 90% with each additional log organism load in the original specimen (baseline) (adjusted odds ratio, 1.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-3.2). Among heterosexuals, the odds of repeat positivity decreased by 10% with each additional week delay in being retested for chlamydia (adjusted odds ratio, 0.9; 95% confidence interval, 0.8-0.9). CONCLUSIONS: Positive retests were more common among MSM than heterosexuals. Treatment failure was more common in MSM with rectal chlamydia, reinforcing concerns about azithromycin treatment failure.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Chlamydia/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Chlamydia/psicología , Chlamydia trachomatis/efectos de los fármacos , Heterosexualidad/psicología , Homosexualidad Masculina/psicología , Cooperación del Paciente , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Australia/epidemiología , Azitromicina/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Chlamydia/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Enfermedades de los Genitales Femeninos/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de los Genitales Femeninos/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades de los Genitales Femeninos/psicología , Enfermedades de los Genitales Masculinos/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de los Genitales Masculinos/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades de los Genitales Masculinos/psicología , Humanos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Enfermedades del Recto/diagnóstico , Enfermedades del Recto/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades del Recto/psicología , Recurrencia , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
9.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 97(5): 976-985, 2017 04 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28209443

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: SpaceOAR, a Food and Drug Administration-approved hydrogel intended to create a rectal-prostate space, was evaluated in a single-blind phase III trial of image guided intensity modulated radiation therapy. A total of 222 men were randomized 2:1 to the spacer or control group and received 79.2 Gy in 1.8-Gy fractions to the prostate with or without the seminal vesicles. The present study reports the final results with a median follow-up period of 3 years. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Cumulative (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0) toxicity was evaluated using the log-rank test. Quality of life (QOL) was examined using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC), and the mean changes from baseline in the EPIC domains were tested using repeated measures models. The proportions of men with minimally important differences (MIDs) in each domain were tested using repeated measures logistic models with prespecified thresholds. RESULTS: The 3-year incidence of grade ≥1 (9.2% vs 2.0%; P=.028) and grade ≥2 (5.7% vs 0%; P=.012) rectal toxicity favored the spacer arm. Grade ≥1 urinary incontinence was also lower in the spacer arm (15% vs 4%; P=.046), with no difference in grade ≥2 urinary toxicity (7% vs 7%; P=0.7). From 6 months onward, bowel QOL consistently favored the spacer group (P=.002), with the difference at 3 years (5.8 points; P<.05) meeting the threshold for a MID. The control group had a 3.9-point greater decline in urinary QOL compared with the spacer group at 3 years (P<.05), but the difference did not meet the MID threshold. At 3 years, more men in the control group than in the spacer group had experienced a MID decline in bowel QOL (41% vs 14%; P=.002) and urinary QOL (30% vs 17%; P=.04). Furthermore, the control group were also more likely to have experienced large declines (twice the MID) in bowel QOL (21% vs 5%; P=.02) and urinary QOL (23% vs 8%; P=.02). CONCLUSIONS: The benefit of a hydrogel spacer in reducing the rectal dose, toxicity, and QOL declines after image guided intensity modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer was maintained or increased with a longer follow-up period, providing stronger evidence for the benefit of hydrogel spacer use in prostate radiation therapy.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Traumatismos por Radiación/epidemiología , Traumatismos por Radiación/prevención & control , Protección Radiológica/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades del Recto/epidemiología , Enfermedades del Recto/prevención & control , Adulto , Anciano , Causalidad , Fraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Órganos en Riesgo/efectos de la radiación , Prevalencia , Neoplasias de la Próstata/psicología , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Traumatismos por Radiación/psicología , Protección Radiológica/instrumentación , Radioterapia Conformacional/métodos , Radioterapia Conformacional/psicología , Radioterapia Conformacional/estadística & datos numéricos , Radioterapia Guiada por Imagen/psicología , Radioterapia Guiada por Imagen/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades del Recto/psicología , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
10.
Colorectal Dis ; 17(12): 1094-9, 2015 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26104058

RESUMEN

AIM: Tenesmus in rectal prolapse leads to a vicious circle of straining with deterioration of prolapse. The primary phenomenon triggering this may be rectal hypersensitivity. We aimed to assess whether treatment with tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) may break the vicious circle and improve tenesmus. METHOD: A retrospective review was carried out of patients with rectal prolapse and severe tenesmus who were poor surgical candidates or had refused surgery. They were treated at our tertiary centre with low dose tricyclic antidepressants. RESULTS: Twenty-three (18 female) patients were included, with mean age 75.3 (±SD 14.6) years. The mean duration of symptoms was 10.8 (± 8.6) months. Full-thickness rectal prolapse was diagnosed in 16 (70%) patients while seven (30%) had mucosal or incomplete prolapse. Ten (43%), eight (35%) and five (22%) patients were treated with nortriptyline (25 mg daily), amitriptyline (10 mg daily) and desipramine (25 mg daily). After a mean follow-up of 9.05 (± 8.2) months, 14 (61%) patients reported significant improvement in symptoms, five (22%) had a partial response, three (13%) were lost to follow-up and one (4%) failed to respond. The response rates for nortriptyline, desipramine and amitriptyline were 90%, 100% and 62.5%. CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge this is the first report to address the symptomatic, conservative treatment of tenesmus in patients with rectal prolapse. TCAs may be an acceptable option for poor surgical candidates or patients refusing surgery.


Asunto(s)
Antidepresivos Tricíclicos/administración & dosificación , Enfermedades del Recto/tratamiento farmacológico , Prolapso Rectal/complicaciones , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Amitriptilina/administración & dosificación , Defecación/efectos de los fármacos , Desipramina/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nortriptilina/administración & dosificación , Enfermedades del Recto/etiología , Enfermedades del Recto/psicología , Prolapso Rectal/patología , Prolapso Rectal/psicología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
11.
Am J Health Behav ; 39(1): 22-33, 2015 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25290594

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To explore the help-seeking pathway for lower bowel symptoms in men diagnosed with benign bowel diseases. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted. The data were analyzed thematically using Andersen's Model of Patient Delay as the theoretical framework. RESULTS: The major delaying factors were attribution of symptoms to self-limiting conditions, failure to make time to visit a GP, low expectation of help from the GP, fear of cancer diagnosis and embarrassment. CONCLUSION: The major causes of delay in help-seeking were related to the participants, whereas factors associated with treatment delay were less prominent in diagnostic delay.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades del Colon/psicología , Diagnóstico Tardío/psicología , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/psicología , Enfermedades del Recto/psicología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedades del Colon/diagnóstico , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades del Recto/diagnóstico
12.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 22(3): 378-83, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24933404

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the external validity of the validated French model of the quality-of-life questionnaire (QOL) SF-36 in predicting improvement after colorectal resection for endometriosis. DESIGN: Italian and Brazilian cohort studies (Canadian Task Force classification II-3). SETTING: Tertiary referral university hospital in Brazil and expert center in endometriosis in Italy. PATIENTS: Patients with colorectal endometriosis from an Italian population (n = 63) and a Brazilian population (n = 151). INTERVENTION: Laparoscopic colorectal resection for treatment of endometriosis. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Preoperative and postoperative evaluations of the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS) of the SF-36 were performed. Substantial improvement in PCS and MCS was observed after colorectal resection in both populations. In the Brazilian population, the receiver operating curve (ROC) (area under the curve [AUC]) was 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77-0.89) for MCS and 0.78 (95% CI, 0.71-0.83) for PCS, demonstrating good discrimination performance. The mean difference between the predicted and calibrated probabilities was 19.6% for MCS and 32.8% for PCS. In the Italian population, the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.65 (95% CI, 0.52-0.78) for PCS and 0.67 (95% CI, 0.55-0.78) for MCS. The model demonstrated poor discrimination and calibration performance for PCS (p < .001) and MCS (p = .003). The mean difference between the predicted and calibrated probabilities was 17.5% for MCS and 21.8% for PCS. CONCLUSION: Despite the use of validated translations of the SF-36, our results underline the limits of this tool in selection of patients for colorectal resection due to underestimation of predicted quality of life, possibly because of variations in epidemiologic characteristics of the populations.


Asunto(s)
Colon/patología , Enfermedades del Colon/psicología , Endometriosis/psicología , Calidad de Vida , Enfermedades del Recto/psicología , Recto/patología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto , Brasil/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Colectomía , Colon/cirugía , Enfermedades del Colon/epidemiología , Enfermedades del Colon/cirugía , Endometriosis/epidemiología , Endometriosis/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Laparoscopía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Selección de Paciente , Periodo Posoperatorio , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Enfermedades del Recto/epidemiología , Enfermedades del Recto/cirugía , Recto/cirugía , Medición de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/normas , Resultado del Tratamiento
13.
Surg Endosc ; 28(1): 227-34, 2014 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24002918

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: For selected patients with rectal cancer, endoluminal locoregional resection (ELRR) by transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) may be an alternative treatment option to laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LTME). Few data are available on quality of life (QoL) after LTME and TEM. This study aimed to compare short- and medium-term QoL for T1 rectal cancer patients undergoing LTME or ELRR by TEM. METHODS: This study investigated 35 patients with T1N0 rectal cancer who underwent TEM (n = 17) or LTME (n = 18). Quality of life was evaluated by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 and QLQ-C38 questionnaires preoperatively and then 1, 6, and 12 months after surgery. RESULTS: Observation 1 month after LTME showed worsening in all items of both questionnaires. After ELRR, the QLQ-CR38 showed worsening of gastrointestinal (p = 0.005) and defecation problems (p = 0.001), and the QLQ-C30 showed worsening of global health status (p = 0.014), physical functioning (p = 0.02) role functioning (p = 0.003), fatigue (p = 0.002), and pain (p = 0.001). The QLQ-CR38 6 months after LTME showed worsening of body image (p = 0.009), micturition (p = 0.035), and gastrointestinal problems (p = 0.011), and the QLQ-C30 showed worsening of physical functioning (p = 0.003), role functioning (p = 0.002), fatigue (p = 0.004), and nausea/vomiting (p = 0.030). After ELRR, neither the QLQ-CR38 nor the QLQ-C30 questionnaire showed any worsening but demonstrated improvement in global health status and physical functioning. The QLQ-CR38 12 months after LTME showed significant improvement in defecation problems (p = 0.004) and weight loss (p = 0.003), and the QLQ-C30 showed significant improvement in global health status (p = 0.001), nausea and vomiting (p = 0.003), and pain (p = 0.005). After ELRR, the QLQ-C30 showed improvement in emotional functioning (p = 0.012), whereas no significant difference was observed by the QLQ-C38. CONCLUSIONS: Functional sequelae are present up to 1 month only after ELRR by TEM and up to 6 months after LTME. At 12 months, neither procedure showed a significant difference in QoL compared with preoperative status.


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia/efectos adversos , Colonoscopía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Microcirugia/efectos adversos , Calidad de Vida , Enfermedades del Recto/psicología , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Enfermedades del Recto/etiología , Neoplasias del Recto/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño/etiología , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
14.
Chirurg ; 83(12): 1023-32, 2012 Dec.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23149766

RESUMEN

The majority of proctological diseases can be defined by a structured evaluation of the symptoms and a physical examination. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and anal endosonography can detect complex anal fistulas with a high accuracy but MRI should be preferred because of its objective visualization. Functional anorectal disorders are multifactorial and show morphological and functional irregularities in different compartments of the pelvic floor which is why MR defecography is now one of the most important methods in diagnostic algorithms. Interpreting the results of anal endosonography, anal manometry and neurophysiological testing is highly demanding because of large interindividual variability. Scores are used for objective measurement of symptom severity and quality of life. In clinical practice, well validated scores evaluated in large patient groups with predetermined circumstances are needed. Bringing together morphological results with scores based on subjective perception is required to optimize diagnostics and therapy evaluation in proctology.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades del Ano/diagnóstico , Enfermedades del Recto/diagnóstico , Enfermedades del Ano/psicología , Enfermedades del Ano/cirugía , Defecografía , Endosonografía , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Manometría , Examen Neurológico , Trastornos del Suelo Pélvico/diagnóstico , Trastornos del Suelo Pélvico/psicología , Trastornos del Suelo Pélvico/cirugía , Examen Físico , Proctoscopía , Pronóstico , Calidad de Vida , Enfermedades del Recto/psicología , Enfermedades del Recto/cirugía , Fístula Rectal/diagnóstico , Fístula Rectal/psicología , Fístula Rectal/cirugía
15.
J Gastrointest Surg ; 15(10): 1712-7, 2011 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21786060

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There are little data regarding the impact of depression on outcomes after gastrointestinal surgery. We hypothesize that depression would be associated with prolonged hospital stay and changes in discharge disposition for patients undergoing colon and rectal surgery. METHODS: We identified 292,191 patients undergoing colon and rectal surgery using the 2008 Nationwide Inpatient Sample. We used multivariate regression to evaluate the effect of depression on length of stay and discharge disposition. RESULTS: A preoperative diagnosis of depression was present in 20,039 (6.9%) patients. Mean length of stay for those with depression (10.4 days, 95% confidence interval (CI) 10.04-10.76) was significantly longer than for patients without depression (9.64 days, 95% CI 9.48-9.81). After adjusting for cofounders, depression still predicted an increase in length of stay. Additionally, depressed patients were less likely to resume normal function at discharge, as 40% required either home health or time in a skilled facility following discharge from the acute care hospital. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients undergoing colorectal surgery, depression is associated with a significantly prolonged hospital stay and higher likelihood of requiring skilled nursing assistance after discharge. Further research into the mechanism underlying these differences and potential treatment strategies among depressed patients is warranted.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades del Colon/cirugía , Trastorno Depresivo/complicaciones , Tiempo de Internación , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Enfermedades del Recto/cirugía , Enfermedades del Colon/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Alta del Paciente , Enfermedades del Recto/psicología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
16.
Dtsch Med Wochenschr ; 136(19): 997-1002, 2011 May.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21544791

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Fast track (enhanced recovery) surgery is a standardized concept of perioperative management, which is applied independently of the disease and the operative procedure. The implementation of this concept adjusts the quality of medical results and allows to analyse different factors and their impact on quality of life (QoL). The aim of this investigation was to assess the QoL of patients after elective colorectal surgery undergoing standardized perioperative fast track rehabilitation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From December 2004 to May 2006 all patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery and fast track rehabilitation were included in this study. Quality of life was evaluated prospectively using the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) according to Eypasch. QoL was analyzed pre- and postoperatively. Subgroup analyses were performed regarding age, malignant or non-malignant colorectal disease and surgical approach. Follow-up was performed three months postoperatively. RESULTS: 124 patients underwent elective resection within a fast track program (age 64±10 years, 55 with benign disease, 69 with colorectal carcinoma; 67 men and 57 women). 62 patients (50 %) completed the follow-up examination (QoL evaluation three months postoperatively). Pre- and postoperative QoL did not differ significantly (98 [92-104] and 103 [98-109] points, respectively). Subgroup analyses revealed that patients having undergone colorectal resection for benign disease had significantly improved quality of life after surgery, but not so the patients treated for colorectal cancer. The QoL was 14 (2-26) and -1 (-9 - 5), respectively. Patients' age and surgical approach (minimally invasive or open) did not influence their QoL. CONCLUSION: Postoperative QoL after standarized fast track perioperative management was influenced mainly by the patients' disease (with potential QoL improvement in benign disorders), whereas age and the operative approach (minimally invasive or open) had little impact in this respect.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades del Colon/psicología , Enfermedades del Colon/cirugía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/psicología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Laparoscopía , Tiempo de Internación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos , Atención Perioperativa/psicología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/psicología , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Enfermedades del Recto/psicología , Enfermedades del Recto/cirugía , Anciano , Anestesia Epidural , Enfermedades del Colon/mortalidad , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Ambulación Precoz/psicología , Femenino , Alemania , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Satisfacción del Paciente , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Estudios Prospectivos , Enfermedades del Recto/mortalidad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
17.
J Pediatr Surg ; 46(4): 691-698, 2011 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21496539

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Fecal and urinary incontinence may differently influence various aspects of quality of life (QOL). The main aim of the present study is to determine whether fecal and urinary incontinence measured at time 1 of the study will predict QOL at time 2 (after 4 years), above and beyond the prediction already explained by fecal and urinary incontinence at time 2. METHODS: Thirty-six adult patients from the Italian Parents' and Patients' Association for Anorectal Malformations answered items about urinary and fecal incontinence at time 1 of the study and completed the Hirschsprung Disease/Anorectal Malformation Quality of Life questionnaire after 4 years from the first questionnaire. Two sets of hierarchical regression analyses were conducted with fecal and urinary incontinence serving as predictors of QOL and the different areas of QOL from the Hirschsprung Disease/Anorectal Malformation Quality of Life serving as outcome variables. RESULTS: The principal findings indicated that fecal continence is a strong predictor of QOL in the areas of social functioning, emotional functioning, and body image and that urinary incontinence predicted sexual functioning. CONCLUSIONS: It seems that one's past experience with fecal incontinence is extremely relevant to current QOL, especially for body image. Urinary incontinence contributed less in explaining QOL in our patients, but because it is very relevant for sexual functioning, it should not be disregarded.


Asunto(s)
Canal Anal/anomalías , Enfermedades del Ano/psicología , Incontinencia Fecal/psicología , Calidad de Vida , Enfermedades del Recto/psicología , Recto/anomalías , Enfermedades Urológicas/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto , Enfermedades del Ano/complicaciones , Enfermedades del Ano/congénito , Defecación , Incontinencia Fecal/etiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades del Recto/complicaciones , Enfermedades del Recto/congénito , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Tiempo , Micción , Enfermedades Urológicas/etiología , Adulto Joven
18.
Colorectal Dis ; 12(8): 792-8, 2010 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19570066

RESUMEN

AIM: Some benign anorectal diseases may have psychosomatic aetiology, but patients often refuse direct psychological counselling. The Draw-the-Family Test (DFT) is a simple indirect investigation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the DFT in patients with psychological problems undergoing surgery for benign anorectal disease and to correlate the results with surgical outcome. METHOD: DFT was administered prior to surgery to 62 patients with benign anorectal disease who admitted psychological problems at the time of the outpatient visit. Of these 18 (29%) had functional disease, mainly obstructed defecation (OD) while 44 (71%) had organic disease (haemorrhoids, fissures, pilonidal sinus or fistula). DFT was also administered to 40 healthy control subjects. Each DFT was judged as normal or pathological according to 10 parameters. Patients were followed up for a median of 12 months (range 3-64) and divided into two outcome groups, success (n = 58) and failure (n = 12) according to the results of a questionnaire. The DFT of all patients was then correlated with the outcome. RESULTS: None of the patients refused DFT. All DFT parameters but one (animal/things instead of human beings) were more frequent in patients compared with controls (P < 0.05). When comparing separately organic or functional disease patients with controls, one parameter (absence of patient in the drawing) was only pathological in the organic disease group (P < 0.05). Another parameter (schematic figures) was more frequently altered in the organic disease group compared with the functional disease group (P = 0.01). Eight out of 10 parameters were more frequently pathological in patients who failed after treatment, but none reached statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Results of DFT in patients with anorectal disease admitting to psychological problems are markedly different from healthy controls. Patients with organic disease and those with functional bowel disease have different DFT profiles. In our study group, DFT had an excellent compliance but could not predict the outcome of surgery.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Preoperatorios/psicología , Técnicas Psicológicas , Pruebas Psicológicas , Trastornos Psicofisiológicos/psicología , Enfermedades del Recto/psicología , Enfermedades del Recto/cirugía , Adulto , Canal Anal/fisiopatología , Defecación/fisiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Seno Pilonidal/psicología , Seno Pilonidal/cirugía , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Trastornos Psicofisiológicos/fisiopatología , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
19.
Dis Colon Rectum ; 52(9): 1616-23, 2009 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19690491

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Randomized controlled trials have established that there is no benefit to withholding oral food and fluids from colorectal surgery patients postoperatively. The aim of this survey was to determine food preferences for the first postoperative meal and compare these with a traditional clear-fluid diet. METHODS: One hundred forty-five elective colorectal surgery patients were surveyed about their preferences for 35 common foods within 72 hours of surgery and their levels of nausea, hunger, and pain. Preferences were examined by postoperative day (one vs. two) and levels of nausea, hunger, and pain. RESULTS: The survey showed that patients significantly preferred solid foods as early as the first postoperative day and their preferences had little congruency with the traditional clear-fluid diet. Foods highest in preference, such as eggs, regular broth soup (e.g., chicken noodle soup), toast, and potatoes, were significantly more preferred than common clear-fluid diet items such as gelatin, clear broth, and carbonated beverages (P < 0.01). Oral supplements were preferred by only 44%. Patients reported low levels of nausea, hunger, and pain. CONCLUSION: Postoperative colorectal surgery patients prefer to receive simple solid foods rather than a clear-fluid diet as their first postoperative meal.


Asunto(s)
Apetito , Enfermedades del Colon/fisiopatología , Dieta , Satisfacción del Paciente , Enfermedades del Recto/fisiopatología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedades del Colon/psicología , Enfermedades del Colon/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Hambre , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cuidados Posoperatorios , Enfermedades del Recto/psicología , Enfermedades del Recto/cirugía , Adulto Joven
20.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 23(5): 521-6, 2008 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18274765

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) is a chronic disabling condition. Several therapeutic options have been advocated including conservative approaches and surgery, bringing into question their functional outcomes. This study aimed to assess treatment procedures on both anorectal complaints and quality of life (QoL) using standardised self-administered questionnaires. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-one patients who underwent treatments for SRUS in two referral centres were reviewed. A standardised self-administered questionnaire including incontinence (Cleveland Clinic), constipation (Knowles-Eccersley-Scott symptom, KESS) and gastrointestinal quality of life index validated scoring systems was mailed to each patient (median follow-up, 36 months). Correlation between treatment options, functional results and quality of life was analysed. RESULTS: The mean Cleveland Clinic and KESS scores were respectively 5.3+/-5.8 (normal 0) and 19.1+/-8 (normal<9). The mean QoL score reached 89+/-28.8 (normal 125). A linear correlation between the QoL score and functional results was observed. There was no influence of treatment options on QoL results. A multivariate analysis identified five parameters predictive of a better QoL: presence of paradoxical puborectalis contraction, absence of descending perineum, absence of procidentia, age<40 and treatment exclusively based on laxatives. CONCLUSION: Despite several therapeutic options including surgery, patients with SRUS still frequently complain of disturbed anorectal function and significant alteration of their QoL.


Asunto(s)
Biorretroalimentación Psicológica , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo , Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica , Laxativos/uso terapéutico , Calidad de Vida , Enfermedades del Recto/terapia , Úlcera/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Estreñimiento/fisiopatología , Estreñimiento/prevención & control , Estreñimiento/psicología , Incontinencia Fecal/fisiopatología , Incontinencia Fecal/prevención & control , Incontinencia Fecal/psicología , Femenino , Francia , Tracto Gastrointestinal/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Selección de Paciente , Enfermedades del Recto/complicaciones , Enfermedades del Recto/fisiopatología , Enfermedades del Recto/psicología , Prolapso Rectal/fisiopatología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Síndrome , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Úlcera/complicaciones , Úlcera/fisiopatología , Úlcera/psicología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA