Supragastric belching and rumination syndrome: diagnosis and management.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review article aims to discuss the clinical presentation and diagnosis of rumination syndrome and supragastric belching, as well as treatment options for both diseases. RECENT FINDINGS: Functional gastrointestinal disorders such as rumination syndrome and supragastric belching may be effectively treated using biofeedback. SUMMARY: A comprehensive approach that includes potential pharmacologic treatments, cognitive behavioral therapy and biofeedback should also be considered for optimal management of supragastric belching and rumination.

AGA Clinical Practice Update on Evaluation and Management of Belching, Abdominal Bloating, and Distention: Expert Review.

DESCRIPTION: Belching, bloating, and abdominal distention are all highly prevalent gastrointestinal symptoms and account for some of the most common reasons for patient visits to outpatient gastroenterology practices. These symptoms are often debilitating, affecting patients' quality of life, and contributing to work absenteeism. Belching and bloating differ in their pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management, and there is limited evidence available for their various treatments. Therefore, the purpose of this American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Clinical Practice Update is to provide best practice advice based on both controlled trials and observational data for clinicians covering clinical features, diagnostics, and management considerations that include dietary, gut-directed behavioral, and drug therapies. METHODS: This Expert Review was commissioned and approved by the AGA Institute Clinical Practice Updates Committee and the AGA Governing Board to provide timely guidance on a topic of high clinical importance to the AGA membership, and underwent internal peer review by the Clinical Practice Updates Committee and external peer review through standard procedures of Gastroenterology. These best practice advice statements were drawn from a review of the published literature based on clinical trials, the more robust observational studies, and from expert opinion. Because systematic reviews were not performed, these best practice advice statements do not carry formal ratings regarding the quality of evidence or strength of the presented considerations. Best Practice Advice Statements BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 1: Clinical history and physical examination findings and impedance pH monitoring can help to differentiate between gastric and supragastric belching. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 2: Treatment options for supragastric belching may include brain-gut behavioral therapies, either separately or in combination, such as cognitive behavioral therapy, diaphragmatic breathing, speech therapy, and central neuromodulators. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 3: Rome IV criteria should be used to diagnose primary abdominal bloating and distention. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 4: Carbohydrate enzyme deficiencies may be ruled out with dietary restriction and/or breath testing. In a small subset of at-risk patients, small bowel aspiration and glucose- or lactulose-based hydrogen breath testing may be used to evaluate for small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 5: Serologic testing may rule out celiac disease in patients with bloating and, if serologies are positive, a small bowel biopsy should be done to confirm the diagnosis. A gastroenterology dietitian should be part of the multidisciplinary approach to care for patients with celiac disease and nonceliac gluten sensitivity. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 6: Abdominal imaging and upper endoscopy should be ordered in patients with alarm features, recent worsening symptoms, or an abnormal physical examination only. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 7: Gastric emptying studies should not be ordered routinely for bloating and distention, but may be considered if nausea and vomiting are present. Whole gut motility and radiopaque transit studies should not be ordered unless other additional and treatment-refractory lower gastrointestinal symptoms exist to warrant testing for neuromyopathic disorders. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 8: In patients with abdominal bloating and distention thought to be related to constipation or difficult evacuation, anorectal physiology testing is suggested to rule out a pelvic floor disorder. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 9: When dietary modifications are needed (eg, low-fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides and polyols diet), a gastroenterology dietitian should preferably monitor treatment. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 10: Probiotics should not be used to treat abdominal bloating and distention. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 11: Biofeedback therapy may be effective for bloating and distention when a pelvic floor disorder is identified. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 12: Central neuromodulators (eg, antidepressants) are used to treat bloating and abdominal distention by reducing visceral hypersensitivity, raising sensation threshold, and improving psychological comorbidities. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 13: Medications used to treat constipation should be considered for treating bloating if constipation symptoms are present. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 14: Psychological therapies, such as hypnotherapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, and other brain-gut behavior therapies may be used to treat patients with bloating and distention. BEST PRACTICE 15: Diaphragmatic breathing and central neuromodulators are used to treat abdominophrenic dyssynergia.

Is belching increasing after bariatric bypass surgery in the long term period?

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Gastric bypass surgery effectively treats obesity; however, its association with belching, which occurs in other bariatric surgeries, remains unclear. Hence, we aimed to evaluate belching occurrence after gastric bypass surgery. METHODS: We enrolled 12 healthy volunteers and 17 patients (12 and 5 underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and mini-gastric bypass surgeries 24 (18-54) months prior, respectively). Gastrointestinal symptoms were assessed. Gastroscopy was performed, followed by the 24-hour pH-impedance analysis. RESULTS: Age and sex were not statistically different between the two groups (P > 0.05). Patients had a significantly higher mean DeMeester score than the healthy controls (9.11 ± 19.40 vs. 6.04 ± 5.60, P = 0.048), but the pathologic acid reflux (DeMeester score > 14) rate was similar in both groups (11.8% vs. 8.3%). Regarding the impedance, symptom-association probability was positive in 11.8% of patients. The patients also had higher alkaline reflux rates (6% vs. 0%); additionally, 50% of them experienced belching based on the questionnaire, and 25% had esophagitis based on gastroscopy. Furthermore, patients had a significantly higher number of gas reflux (123.24 ± 80 vs. 37.2 ± 21.5, P = 0.001) and supragastric/ gastric belches (182 ± 64/228 ± 66.69 vs. 25.08 ± 15.20/12.17 ± 17.65, P = 0.001). Supragastric belching was more frequent than gastric belching in the controls, whereas gastric belching was more frequent in the patients. CONCLUSION: Belching increases after gastric bypass surgery in a long-term period. Gastric belching was more frequent than supragastric belching in these patients.

Abelchia: inability to belch/burp-a new disorder? Retrograde cricopharyngeal dysfunction (RCPD).

CASE SERIES: This is retrospective case series involving 72 patients who presented with symptoms associated with inability to burp. The following symptoms was described by almost all the patients; retrosternal pain after eating or drinking, bloating feeling in the stomach, gurgling noise in the throat, excessive flatulence. These symptoms are worse with fizzy/carbonated drinks and beer. A full clinical history and examination plus endoscopic and in some cases barium a swallow radiological investigation was done. PROCEDURE: The surgery was performed under a general anaesthesia for all cases. Suspension pharyngoscopy in supine position using a Weerda diverticuloscope to identify the cricopharyngeal bar muscle. High dose of botulinum toxin A (botox) 100 iu was injected into the cricopharynxgeus muscle under a general anaesthesia. RESULTS: A total of 72 patients were diagnosed and undergone surgery between November 2016 and December 2020. There were 50 male and 22 female patients. Their average age was 30 (range 18-68 years old). All patients were able to burp again within first 4 weeks of the injection. This persisted even after the Botox worn off beyond the 3 months in 96% of cases. The average follow-up was 24 months post injection with longest follow-up 48 months (range 1-48 months). CONCLUSION: The author reported a new condition of inability to burp due to failure of the cricopharyngeal sphincter to relax spontaneously and outcome of treatment using botulinum toxin A injection into the cricopharyngeus muscle. It is expected that the paralysing action of botulinum toxin injection last approximately 3 months. However, this group of patients seem to be cured even after the effect of the botox is worn off. The author therefore postulated that there might me some neural dysfunction that inhibits the brain to send signals to the cricopharyngeal sphincter to initiate burping. Once burping is re-established with the help of botox injection, spontaneous burping seems to occur and sustained even after the botox is worn off.

Spontaneous pneumomediastinum: an uncommon clinical problem with a potential for missed or delayed diagnosis.

A 15-year-old man presented with an acute history of facial swelling following a bout of forceful eructation after eating. Subcutaneous emphysema was noted on examination of his left face and neck. He was initially managed with intravenous antibiotics for suspected facial infection. A chest radiograph performed on day 3 of admission identified subcutaneous emphysema of the upper thorax and neck. CT with oral contrast confirmed extensive subcutaneous emphysema of neck, thorax and upper abdomen, with associated pneumomediastinum. The site of air leak was not identified. He subsequently underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and this was normal. Despite the delay in diagnosis, he remained haemodynamically stable, and repeated radiography showed improvement reflecting the benign course of this condition as described in existing literature. There are no previous published reports of spontaneous pneumomediastinum following eructation; therefore, high clinical suspicion should be maintained in this presentation.

ESNM/ANMS consensus paper: Diagnosis and management of refractory gastro-esophageal reflux disease.

Up to 40% of patients with symptoms suspicious of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) do not respond completely to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. The term "refractory GERD" has been used loosely in the literature. A distinction should be made between refractory symptoms (ie, symptoms may or may not be GERD-related), refractory GERD symptoms (ie, persisting symptoms in patients with proven GERD, regardless of relationship to ongoing reflux), and refractory GERD (ie, objective evidence of GERD despite adequate medical management). The present ESNM/ANMS consensus paper proposes use the term "refractory GERD symptoms" only in patients with persisting symptoms and previously proven GERD by either endoscopy or esophageal pH monitoring. Even in this context, symptoms may or may not be reflux related. Objective evaluation, including endoscopy and esophageal physiologic testing, is requisite to provide insights into mechanisms of symptom generation and evidence of true refractory GERD. Some patients may have true ongoing refractory acid or weakly acidic reflux despite PPIs, while others have no evidence of ongoing reflux, and yet others have functional esophageal disorders (overlapping with proven GERD confirmed off therapy). In this context, attention should also be paid to supragastric belching and rumination syndrome, which may be important contributors to refractory symptoms.

Identification of Different Phenotypes of Esophageal Reflux Hypersensitivity and Implications for Treatment.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Reflux hypersensitivity (RH), a functional esophageal disorder, is detected in 14%-20% of patients who present with typical esophageal symptoms. As many as 40% of patients with RH do not respond to treatment with pain modulators or proton pump inhibitors (PPIs); behavior disorders might contribute to lack of treatment efficacy. We aimed to assess the prevalence of behavioral disorders and their effects on typical reflux symptoms in patients with RH. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 542 patients with PPI-refractory esophageal symptoms (heartburn, regurgitation, or chest pain) or with symptoms that responded to PPI therapy, evaluated for anti-reflux surgery from January 2016 through August 2019 at a single center in London, United Kingdom. We collected data on symptoms, motility, and impedance-pH monitoring and assigned patients to categories of RH (n = 116), functional heartburn (n = 126), or non-erosive reflux disease (n = 300). RESULTS: Of the 116 patients with a diagnosis of RH, 59 had only hypersensitivity, whereas 57 patients (49.2%) had either excessive supragastric belching (SGB, 39.7%), based on 24-hour impedance-pH monitoring, or rumination (9.5%), based on postprandial manometry combined with impedance. The prevalence of SGB and rumination in patients with RH was significantly higher than in patients with functional heartburn (22%; P < .001). Patients with RH and rumination were significantly younger (P = .005) and had the largest number of non-acid reflux episodes (P = .023). In patients with RH with SGB, SGB episodes were associated with 40.6% of marked reflux symptoms (heartburn, regurgitation, or chest pain), based on impedance-pH monitoring. In patients with RH and rumination, 40% of reflux-related symptoms (mostly regurgitation) were due to possible rumination episodes. CONCLUSIONS: Almost half of patients with a diagnosis of RH have behavior disorders, including excessive SGB or rumination. Episodes of SGB or rumination are associated with typical reflux symptoms. Segregation of patients with diagnosis of RH into those with vs without behavioral disorders might have important therapeutic implications.

Responses to gastric gas in patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders.

BACKGROUND: Gas-related abdominal symptoms are common in patients with functional gut disorders, but the responses to cope with the large volumes of gas that enter daily into the stomach have not been studied in detail. Our aim was to evaluate transit and tolerance of gastric gas in patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders. METHODS: In eight healthy volunteers and 24 patients with functional gut disorders (eight functional dyspepsia, eight belching disorder, and eight functional bloating) 1500 ml of a gas mixture were infused into the stomach at 25 ml/min. Belching, rectal gas evacuation, and abdominal perception were continuously recorded for 90 minutes. KEY RESULTS: Healthy subjects expelled the infused gas per rectum (1614 ± 73 ml), with a small rise in epigastric perception (score increment 1.0 ± 0.4) and virtually no belching (1 ± 1 belches). Patients with functional dyspepsia had a hypersensitive response to gastric gas, with a significant rise in epigastric perception (score increment 2.5 ± 0.6; P = .045), a transient delay in rectal gas evacuation and similar belching as healthy controls. Patients with belching disorders responded to gastric gas with continuous belches (33 ± 13 belches; P = .002), low epigastric perception, and a small reduction in rectal gas evacuation. Patients with functional bloating exhibited a slow transit response, with reduced rectal gas evacuation (1017 ± 145 ml; P = .002) and abdominal symptoms (score increment 2.5 ± 0.7), but without compensatory belching. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: Different pathophysiological mechanisms underlay specific adaptive responses to gastric gas in patients with different functional gut disorders. Therapeutic interventions for gas-related abdominal symptoms should be addressed towards these specific pathophysiological disturbances.

Gas, Bloating, and Belching: Approach to Evaluation and Management.

Gas, bloating, and belching are associated with a variety of conditions but are most commonly caused by functional gastrointestinal disorders. These disorders are characterized by disordered motility and visceral hypersensitivity that are often worsened by psychological distress. An organized approach to the evaluation of symptoms fosters trusting therapeutic relationships. Patients can be reliably diagnosed without exhaustive testing and can be classified as having gastric bloating, small bowel bloating, bloating with constipation, or belching disorders. Functional dyspepsia, irritable bowel syndrome, and chronic idiopathic constipation are the most common causes of these disorders. For presumed functional dyspepsia, noninvasive testing for Helicobacter pylori and eradication of confirmed infection (i.e., test and treat) are more cost-effective than endoscopy. Patients with symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome should be tested for celiac disease. Patients with chronic constipation should have a rectal examination to evaluate for dyssynergic defecation. Empiric therapy is a reasonable initial approach to functional gastrointestinal disorders, including acid suppression with proton pump inhibitors for functional dyspepsia, antispasmodics for irritable bowel syndrome, and osmotic laxatives and increased fiber for chronic idiopathic constipation. Nonceliac sensitivities to gluten and other food components are increasingly recognized, but highly restrictive exclusion diets have insufficient evidence to support their routine use except in confirmed celiac disease.

Care for children under six months at domicile: primiparae mother's experience / Cuidado al niño menor de seis meses en el domicilio: experiencia de la madre primípara / Cuidado à criança menor de seis meses no domicilio: experiência da mãe primípara

Abstract Objective: To understand how the primiparous mother exercises maternal care of the child under six months of age at home. Method: Descriptive research with a qualitative approach. A research was carried out at the Primary Health Care Unit in Fortaleza/CE, between the months of May and June 2017, with 20 primiparous mothers. It was used thematic content analysis to analyze the data. Results: Through the organization of the speeches, we obtained the category Maternal Experience in Care. It was noticed that fear, insecurity and doubts were present in the daily life of the interviewees, interfering with care such as bathing and holding the baby; the cleaning of the umbilical scar was ceased after the stump fell; babies slept on their stomachs; pain and stress contributed to the failure of lactation; cleaning of the umbilical stump was ceased after its fall; babies slept in the ventral position; previous experience in caring for younger siblings influenced maternal care. Conclusion and implications for practice: It was understood that the orientations made by the nurses are fundamental for the qualification of the primiparous mothers in the care of the child.

Resumen Objetivo: Comprender como la madre primípara ejerce el cuidado materno al hijo menor de seis meses en el domicilio. Método: Investigación descriptiva con abordaje cualitativo. Se realizó una investigación en Unidad de Atención Primaria a la Salud, en Fortaleza/CE, en los meses de mayo y junio de 2017 con 20 madres primíparas. Se utilizó análisis temático de contenido para análisis de los datos. Resultados: Através de la organización de los discursos se obtuvo categoría Experiencia Materna en el Cuidado. Se percibió que miedo, inseguridad y dudas estaban presentes en el cotidiano de las entrevistadas, interfiriendo en los cuidados como bañarse y sostener al bebé; la limpieza de la cicatriz umbilical era cesada después de la caída del coto; los bebés dormían de bruces; dolor y estrés contribuyeron al fracaso de la lactación; la limpieza del coto umbilical era cesada después de su caída; los bebés dormían en la posición ventral; experiencia previa en el cuidado a los hermanos más jóvenes influía en el cuidado materno. Conclusión e implicaciones para la práctica: Se comprendió que las orientaciones realizadas por los enfermeros son fundamentales para la calificación de las madres primíparas en la asistencia al hijo.

Resumo Objetivo: Compreender como a mãe primípara exerce o cuidado materno ao filho menor de seis meses no domicílio. Método: Pesquisa descritiva com abordagem qualitativa, realizada em uma Unidade de Atenção Primária à Saúde, em Fortaleza/CE, nos meses de maio e junho de 2017. Participaram 20 mães primíparas. Utilizou-se análise temática de conteúdo para análise dos dados. Resultados: Da organização dos discursos, obteve-se a categoria Experiência Materna no Cuidado. Percebeu-se que sentimentos de medo e insegurança estavam presentes no cotidiano das entrevistadas, interferindo nos cuidados como banhar e segurar o bebê; a limpeza da cicatriz umbilical era cessada após a queda do coto; bebês dormiam de bruços; dor e estresse contribuíram para insucesso da lactação; experiência prévia no cuidado aos irmãos mais novos influenciava o cuidado materno. Conclusão e implicações para a prática: Compreendeu-se que as orientações realizadas pelos enfermeiros são fundamentais para qualificação das mães primíparas na assistência ao filho.

Small hepatocellular carcinoma suppressed by chemotherapy for synchronous gastric carcinoma after laparoscopy-assisted radical distal gastrectomy: A case report and literature review.

RATIONALE: Synchronous gastric carcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is rare. It is hard to distinguish synchronous HCC from metastatic liver cancer in this condition. The treatment and prognosis is quite different for synchronous HCC of gastric carcinoma and liver metastasis of gastric carcinoma. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 68-year-old man with a chief complaint of epigastric pain for 1 year, accompanied by reflux and belching. The patient was diagnosed with gastric carcinoma (cT4NxM0) and laparoscopy-assisted radical distal gastrectomy was performed. This was followed by chemotherapy of FOLFOX regimen. However, a liver nodule growth was observed after postoperative systemic treatment. DIAGNOSIS: The initial diagnosis was liver metastasis of gastric carcinoma. However after hepatectomy of segment VI and VII as well as thrombectomy of right hepatic vein, histology revealed intermediate to poor differentiated HCC. Hence this case was diagnosed as synchronous gastric carcinoma and HCC. INTERVENTIONS: A preventive transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) was conducted at 4 weeks after hepatectomy. Another FOLFOX regimen was suggested, but was refused by the patient. OUTCOMES: The patient survived without tumor recurrence for 9 months after the second surgery. LESSONS: Synchronous HCC should be routinely distinguished from gastric carcinoma liver metastasis, especially for patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. The FOLFOX4 regimen for treating gastric carcinoma liver metastasis may have inhibited the progression of primary HCC in this case. This patient with HCC benefited from liver resection, inspite of hepatic vein tumor thrombosis.

Primary gastric inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor: A case report.

RATIONALE: Primary gastric inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor is extremely rare. Only a few cases were reported in the domestic and foreign medical literature with corresponding imaging findings of this disease even more rarely reported. PATIENT CONCERNS: We present one case of a 52-year-old female patient with upper abdominal pain, acid reflux, and belching for 2 months. DIAGNOSES AND INTERVENTIONS: Electron ultrasound gastroscopy (EUS) revealed elevation of gastric antrum mucosa. A whole abdominal and pelvic multi-slice spiral computed tomography (CT) detected a round nodule in the gastric antrum with considerably delayed enhancement, with initial suspicion of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTS). Then a laparoscopic assisted distal gastrectomy was performed. Finally, the postoperative pathology confirmed the diagnosis of primary gastric IMT. OUTCOMES: After 6 months of follow-up, the patient was still alive without any evidence of metastasis or recurrence. LESSONS: Familiarizing with the CT features of this rare tumor may raise radiologists' awareness of the disease and potentially could avoid misdiagnosis.

Gastric gas dynamics in healthy humans.

BACKGROUND: To cope with the daily increments of gastric gas, the stomach can propel gas to the small bowel or trigger the belching reflex. Our aim was to evaluate transit of free gastric gas in healthy humans, and its relationship with abdominal symptoms. METHODS: In 24 healthy volunteers a gas mixture was infused into the stomach at 0 mL/min (sham infusion), 25 mL/min, 50 mL/min, and 100 mL/min (n = 6 each) up to 1500 mL. Belching, rectal gas evacuation, and abdominal perception were continuously recorded for 90 min. KEY RESULTS: Sham infusion was associated to low rectal gas evacuation (187 ± 94 mL after 90 min), and belching (0 ± 0). In contrast, gastric gas infusion increased rectal gas evacuation (1198 ± 176 mL; P = .025) and belching (4 ± 1 belches; P = .0520) without differences between the infusion rates tested. Overall, there was a negative correlation between rectal gas evacuation and belching (r = -.72; P < .0001): 6 subjects had frequent belching (14 ± 2 belches) and minor rectal gas evacuation (330 ± 112 mL), whereas 12 subjects had virtually no belches (1 ± 1 belches) and greater rectal gas evacuation (1630 ± 147 mL; P < .001 vs belchers for both). Gas infusion induced lower abdominal symptoms in belchers (score increment 0.7 ± 0.3) than in rectal gas evacuators (score increment 1.7 ± 0.5; P = .033). CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: An excellent balance between belching and distal gastric empting allows the stomach to adapt to great variations in gas intake. In general, most gastric gas is emptied to distal intestinal segments, but in some circumstances gastric gas induces belching, a mechanism that may improve gas tolerance.

Reflux and Belching after Laparoscopic 270 degree Posterior Versus 180 degree Anterior Partial Fundoplication.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic 270 degree posterior, or Toupet (LTF), and 180 degree anterior partial fundoplication (LAF) ensure equal reflux control and reduce the risk of gas-related symptoms compared to 360 degree (Nissen) fundoplication. It is unclear which type of partial fundoplication is superior in preventing gas-related side-effects. The aim of this study was to determine differences in effect of LTF and LAF on reflux characteristics and belching patterns. METHODS: Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, esophageal manometry, and 24-h combined pH-impedance monitoring were performed before and 6 months after fundoplication (n = 10, LTF vs. n = 10, LAF). Observed changes after surgery (∆) were compared between the two procedures. RESULTS: Symptomatic reflux control as well as the reduction in the mean number of acid (∆ - 58.5 vs. - 66.5; P = 0.912), liquid (∆ - 17.0 vs. - 43.5; P = 0.247), and mixed liquid gas reflux episodes (∆ - 38.0 vs. - 40.0; P = 0.579) were comparable following LTF and LAF. There were no differences in the mean number of weakly acidic reflux episodes after LTF and LAF (1.0 (0.8-4) vs. 1.0 (0-3), P = 0.436). The reduction in proximal (P = 1.000), mid-esophageal (P = 0.063), and distal reflux episodes (P = 0.315) was comparable. Both procedures equally reduced the number of gastric belches (P = 0.278) and supragastric belches (P = 0.123), with no significant reduction in the number of air swallows after either procedure (P = 0.278). CONCLUSION: LTF and LAF provide similar reflux control, with a comparable effect on acidic, liquid, and gas reflux. Both procedures equally reduced the number of belches and supragastric belches. This study provides the physiological evidence for the published randomized trials reporting similar symptomatic outcome after both types of partial fundoplication.

Gas swallow during meals in patients with excessive belching.

BACKGROUND: Swallowed gas is an important source of abdominal gas, and aerophagia is often believed as a putative cause of gas-related abdominal symptoms. However, altered gas-swallow during meals has not been demonstrated. Our aim was to characterize the number of gas swallows during meals in patients complaining of excessive belching and gaseousness and a control group without abdominal symptoms during a 24-h period. METHODS: A 24-h pH-impedance monitoring was performed in 10 patients with excessive belching, and 11 patients without digestive symptoms or reflux in the pH-impedance study. During the study, patients followed their daily routine and customary meals, without any specific limitation. In each patient the number and content of swallows and belches were analyzed. KEY RESULTS: Total meal periods were similar in controls (75±26 min) and patients (79±21 min; P=.339), but the number of gaseous swallows was greater in patients (114±13 swallows) than controls (71±8 swallows; P=.007), due to a greater frequency of gaseous swallows during meals (15±2 swallows/10 min vs 10±1 swallows/10 min, respectively; P=.008). During the 24-h study period, 66±13 belches were recorded in patients, but only 13±3 belches in controls (P<.001), mainly gastric belches (80±4% and 92±2% of belches, patients, and controls, respectively) which showed a good correlation with the number of gaseous swallows performed during meals (r=.756; P=.011). CONCLUSION AND INFERENCES: Gas is frequently swallowed during meals. Patients complaining of excessive belching have a different swallow pattern during meals, with an increased ingestion of gas that correlates with increased gastric belching events.

LINX® magnetic esophageal sphincter augmentation versus Nissen fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The LINX® magnetic sphincter augmentation system (MSA) is a surgical technique with short-term evidence demonstrating efficacy in the treatment of medically refractory or chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Currently, the Nissen fundoplication is the gold-standard surgical treatment for GERD. We are the first to systematically review the literature and perform a meta-analysis comparing MSA to the Nissen fundoplication. METHODS: A comprehensive search of electronic databases (e.g., MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library) using search terms "Gastroesophageal reflux or heartburn" and "LINX or endoluminal or magnetic" and "fundoplication or Nissen" was completed. All randomized controlled trials, non-randomized comparison study and case series with greater than 5 patients were included. Five hundred and forty-seven titles were identified through primary search, and 197 titles or abstracts were screened after removing duplicates. Meta-analysis was performed on postoperative quality of life outcomes, procedural efficacy and patient procedural satisfaction. RESULTS: Three primary studies identified a total of 688 patients, of whom 273 and 415 underwent Nissen fundoplication and MSA, respectively. MSA was statistically superior to LNF in preserving patient's ability to belch (95.2 vs 65.9%, p < 0.00001) and ability to emesis (93.5 vs 49.5%, p < 0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference between MSA and LNF in gas/bloating (26.7 vs 53.4%, p = 0.06), postoperative dysphagia (33.9 vs 47.1%, p = 0.43) and proton pump inhibitor (PPI) elimination (81.4 vs 81.5%, p = 0.68). CONCLUSION: Magnetic sphincter augmentation appears to be an effective treatment for GERD with short-term outcomes comparable to the more technically challenging and time-consuming Nissen fundoplication. Long-term comparative outcome data past 1 year are needed in order to further understand the efficacy of magnetic sphincter augmentation.