Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 5.537
Filtrar
Más filtros











Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Nucl Med Technol ; 52(2): 152-157, 2024 Jun 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38839118

RESUMEN

The National Cyclotron and PET Centre at Chulabhorn Hospital offers nuclear medicine diagnostic services using state-of-the-art digital PET/CT and PET/MRI machines as well as other related devices. Additionally, the center plays a vital role by having a cyclotron to produce radiopharmaceuticals, which are used both in-house and in other hospitals throughout the country. Despite the center's strict adherence to international standards regarding the use of radioactive substances in patients, there remains a potential risk of radiation exposure for operators, workers, and the public due to radioactive contamination and emissions from unsealed sources. Hence, it is imperative to assess and continuously monitor radiation levels in the work area to ensure the utmost level of safety for personnel. Methods: This study used optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters to measure radiation levels in 17 areas, consisting of 9 controlled and 8 supervised areas. Over a 3-mo period, the average monthly radiation dose was recorded for each location. Results: The PET/CT room registered the highest radiation dose within the controlled area, with a monthly average of 1.81 ± 0.29 mSv, equivalent to an annual dose of 21.72 mSv. This higher dose can be attributed to the significant number of patients served in this room. In supervised areas, the nursing counter located between the examination room and the patient waiting area exhibited the highest radiation exposure. The average monthly dose measured at this location was 0.085 ± 0.019 mSv, resulting in an annual dose of 1.015 mSv. Conclusion: The evaluation of radiation dose in controlled and supervised areas indicated that the overall radiation level remains within the prescribed limits. However, the slight excess that was observed at the nursing counter indicates the need for improvement to ensure compliance with the as-low-as-reasonably-achievable principle. Continuous monitoring of radiation levels should be conducted annually to maintain safety standards and minimize the risk that workers and the general public will be exposed to radioactivity.


Asunto(s)
Ciclotrones , Hospitales , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Dosis de Radiación , Tailandia , Humanos , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Exposición Profesional/prevención & control
2.
J Radiol Prot ; 44(2)2024 Jun 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38834050

RESUMEN

Interventional radiology is a clinical practice with important benefits for patients, but which involves high radiation doses. The optimisation of radiation protection (RP) for paediatric interventional cardiology is a priority for both patients and staff. The use of diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) has been proposed by the International Commission on Radiological Protection to improve RP in imaging procedures. Dose management systems (DMSs) allow the automatic collection of dosimetric, geometric and technical data to assist the optimisation process, with a continuous audit of the procedures, generating alerts to implement corrective actions when necessary. Patient dose indicators may be analysed individually and for different radiation events (fluoroscopy and cine runs). Occupational doses per procedure may be analysed (if electronic dosimeters are available) and linked with patient doses for an integrated approach to RP. Regional optimisation programmes require data collection and processing from several countries to set and periodically update the DRLs. Patient data is anonymised, and each participating hospital has access to their data in a central computer server. Using DMSs may be one of the best ways to support these programs in the collection and analysis of data, raising alerts about high patient and occupational doses and suggesting optimisation actions.


Asunto(s)
Exposición Profesional , Dosis de Radiación , Protección Radiológica , Protección Radiológica/normas , Humanos , Exposición Profesional/prevención & control , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Radiografía Intervencional , Monitoreo de Radiación/métodos , Niveles de Referencia para Diagnóstico , Radiología Intervencionista
3.
BMC Public Health ; 24(1): 1495, 2024 Jun 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38835007

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) carries a high public health burden yet little is known about the relationship between metalworking fluid (MWF) aerosols, occupational noise and CKD. We aimed to explore the relationship between occupational MWF aerosols, occupational noise and CKD. METHODS: A total of 2,738 machinists were sampled from three machining companies in Wuxi, China, in 2022. We used the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) method 5524 to collect individual samples for MWF aerosols exposure, and the Chinese national standard (GBZ/T 189.8-2007) method to test individual occupational noise exposure. The diagnostic criteria for CKD were urinary albumin/creatinine ratio (UACR) of ≥ 30 mg/g and reduced renal function (eGFR < 60 mL.min- 1. 1.73 m- 2) lasting longer than 3 months. Smooth curve fitting was conducted to analyze the associations of MWF aerosols and occupational noise with CKD. A segmented regression model was used to analyze the threshold effects. RESULTS: Workers exposed to MWF aerosols (odds ratio [OR] = 2.03, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.21-3.41) and occupational noise (OR = 1.77, 95%CI: 1.06-2.96) had higher prevalence of CKD than nonexposed workers. A nonlinear and positive association was found between increasing MWF aerosols and occupational noise dose and the risk of CKD. When daily cumulative exposure dose of MWF aerosols exceeded 8.03 mg/m3, the OR was 1.24 (95%CI: 1.03-1.58), and when occupational noise exceeded 87.22 dB(A), the OR was 1.16 (95%CI: 1.04-1.20). In the interactive analysis between MWF aerosols and occupational noise, the workers exposed to both MWF aerosols (cumulative exposure ≥ 8.03 mg/m3-day) and occupational noise (LEX,8 h ≥ 87.22 dB(A)) had an increased prevalence of CKD (OR = 2.71, 95%CI: 1.48-4.96). MWF aerosols and occupational noise had a positive interaction in prevalence of CKD. CONCLUSIONS: Occupational MWF aerosols and noise were positively and nonlinearly associated with CKD, and cumulative MWF aerosols and noise exposure showed a positive interaction with CKD. These findings emphasize the importance of assessing kidney function of workers exposed to MWF aerosols and occupational noise. Prospective and longitudinal cohort studies are necessary to elucidate the causality of these associations.


Asunto(s)
Aerosoles , Metalurgia , Ruido en el Ambiente de Trabajo , Exposición Profesional , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica , Humanos , China/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Aerosoles/análisis , Aerosoles/efectos adversos , Ruido en el Ambiente de Trabajo/efectos adversos , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Masculino , Adulto , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Contaminantes Ocupacionales del Aire/análisis , Contaminantes Ocupacionales del Aire/efectos adversos
4.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 12899, 2024 06 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38839853

RESUMEN

While volatile organic compounds (VOCs) impair various organs, their influence on hearing loss (HL) has not been extensively researched. We aimed to identify the association between VOCs and HL or high-frequency hearing loss (HFHL). We extracted data on age, sex, pure tone audiometry, hypertension, occupational noise exposure, and creatinine-corrected urine VOC metabolite concentrations from the eighth Korea National Health and Nutrition Survey. Among the VOC metabolites, N-acetyl-S-(benzyl)-L-cysteine (BMA, P = 0.004), N-acetyl-S-(phenyl)-L-cysteine (SPMA, P = 0.027), and N-acetyl-S-(3,4-dihydroxybutyl)-L-cysteine (DHBMA, P < 0.001) showed associations with HL. Additionally, HFHL exhibited significant associations with BMA (P = 0.005), 3- and 4-methylhippuric acid (3, 4 MHA, P = 0.049), mandelic acid (MA, P = 0.015), SPMA (P < 0.001), N-acetyl-S-(3-hydroxypropyl)-L-cysteine (3-HPMA, P < 0.001), and DHBMA (P < 0.001). After controlling other factors, DHBMA were associated with HL (P = 0.021) and HFHL (P = 0.014) and exhibited a linear association with the mean hearing level (ß = 0.054, P = 0.024) and high-frequency hearing level (ß = 0.045, P = 0.037). Since 1,3-butadiene may act as an ototoxic material, early screening for workers exposed to 1,3-butadiene and reducing exposure to 1,3-butadiene in everyday life may be helpful to prevent further HL.


Asunto(s)
Butadienos , Pérdida Auditiva , Compuestos Orgánicos Volátiles , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pérdida Auditiva/inducido químicamente , Pérdida Auditiva/etiología , Compuestos Orgánicos Volátiles/orina , Compuestos Orgánicos Volátiles/efectos adversos , República de Corea/epidemiología , Adulto , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Anciano , Encuestas Nutricionales , Audiometría de Tonos Puros
5.
J Radiol Prot ; 44(2)2024 Jun 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38838649

RESUMEN

Protection against ionizing radiations is important in laboratories with radioactive materials and high energy cyclotron beams. The Cyclotron and Radioisotope Center (CYRIC) located in Tohoku University in Miyagi prefecture, Japan and is a well-known nuclear science laboratory with cyclotron beams and substantial number of high activity radioactive materials. Considering this, it is important to perform complete radiation transport computations to ensure the safety of non-occupational and occupational workers. In the present work, we have developed a complete 3-dimensional model of the main cyclotron building and radiation labs using Monte Carlo method. We have found that the dispersed photons and neutrons inside and in the surrounding of the CYRIC building pose no significant risk to occupational and non-occupational workers. The present work and the developed models would be useful in the field of radiation protection.


Asunto(s)
Ciclotrones , Método de Montecarlo , Protección Radiológica , Japón , Exposición Profesional/prevención & control , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Dosis de Radiación , Simulación por Computador , Humanos , Universidades
6.
Sensors (Basel) ; 24(10)2024 May 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38793821

RESUMEN

Radon is a naturally occurring noble radioactive gas that poses significant health risks, particularly lung cancer, due to its colorless, odorless, and tasteless nature, which makes detection challenging without formal testing. It is found in soil, rock, and water, and it infiltrates indoor environments, necessitating regulatory standards and guidelines from organizations such as the Environmental Protection Agency, the World Health Organization, and the Occupational Health and Safety Agency to mitigate exposure. In this paper, we present various methods and instruments for radon assessment in occupational and environmental settings. Discussion on long- and short-term monitoring, including grab sampling, radon dosimetry, and continuous real-time monitoring, is provided. The comparative analysis of detection techniques-active versus passive-is highlighted from real-time data and long-term exposure assessment, including advances in sensor technology, data processing, and public awareness, to improve radon exposure evaluation techniques.


Asunto(s)
Exposición Profesional , Radón , Radón/análisis , Humanos , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Exposición Profesional/prevención & control , Monitoreo de Radiación/métodos , Monitoreo de Radiación/instrumentación , Contaminación del Aire Interior/análisis , Contaminantes Radiactivos del Aire/análisis , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/análisis
7.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 12006, 2024 05 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38796506

RESUMEN

Formaldehyde, a known carcinogenic compound, is commonly used in various medical settings. The objective of this study was to assess the carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risks associated with occupational exposure to formaldehyde. This study was conducted in the pathology labs of four hospitals in Tehran. Cancer and non-cancer risks were evaluated using the quantitative risk assessment method proposed by the United States environmental protection agency (USEPA), along with its provided database known as the integrated risk information system (IRIS). Respiratory symptoms were assessed using the American thoracic society (ATS) questionnaire. The results indicated that 91.23% of exposure levels in occupational groups exceed the NIOSH standard of 0.016 ppm. Regarding carcinogenic risk, 41.03% of all the studied subjects were in the definite carcinogenic risk range (LCR > 10-4), 23.08% were in the possible carcinogenic risk range (10-5 < LCR < 10-4), and 35.90% were in the negligible risk range (LCR < 10-6). The highest index of occupational carcinogenesis was observed in the group of lab technicians with a risk number of 3.7 × 10-4, followed by pathologists with a risk number of 1.7 × 10-4. Furthermore, 23.08% of the studied subjects were within the permitted health risk range (HQ < 1.0), while 76.92% were within the unhealthy risk range (HQ > 1.0). Overall, the findings revealed significantly higher carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risks among lab technicians and pathologists. Therefore, it is imperative to implement control measures across various hospital departments to mitigate occupational formaldehyde exposure levels proactively. These findings can be valuable for policymakers in the health sector, aiding in the elimination or reduction of airborne formaldehyde exposure in work environments.


Asunto(s)
Carcinógenos , Formaldehído , Exposición Profesional , Formaldehído/efectos adversos , Formaldehído/toxicidad , Formaldehído/análisis , Humanos , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Irán/epidemiología , Medición de Riesgo , Carcinógenos/toxicidad , Carcinógenos/análisis , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Hospitales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Laboratorios de Hospital
8.
Front Public Health ; 12: 1355739, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38807987

RESUMEN

Objectives: To assess leukemia risk in occupational populations exposed to low levels of benzene. Methods: Leukemia incidence data from the Chinese Benzene Cohort Study were fitted using the Linearized multistage (LMS) model. Individual benzene exposure levels, urinary S-phenylmercapturic acid (S-PMA) and trans, trans-muconic acid (t, t-MA) were measured among 98 benzene-exposed workers from factories in China. Subjects were categorized into four groups by rounding the quartiles of cumulative benzene concentrations (< 3, 3-5, 5-12, ≥12 mg/m3·year, respectively). The risk of benzene-induced leukemia was assessed using the LMS model, and the results were validated using the EPA model and the Singapore semi-quantitative risk assessment model. Results: The leukemia risks showed a positive correlation with increasing cumulative concentration in the four exposure groups (excess leukemia risks were 4.34, 4.37, 4.44 and 5.52 × 10-4, respectively; Ptrend < 0.0001) indicated by the LMS model. We also found that the estimated leukemia risk using urinary t, t-MA in the LMS model was more similar to those estimated by airborne benzene compared to S-PMA. The leukemia risk estimated by the LMS model was consistent with both the Singapore semi-quantitative risk assessment model at all concentrations and the EPA model at high concentrations (5-12, ≥12 mg/m3·year), while exceeding the EPA model at low concentrations (< 3 and 3-5 mg/m3·year). However, in all four benzene-exposed groups, the leukemia risks estimated by these three models exceeded the lowest acceptable limit for carcinogenic risk set by the EPA at 1 × 10-6. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the utility of the LMS model derived from the Chinese benzene cohort in assessing leukemia risk associated with low-level benzene exposure, and suggests that leukemia risk may occur at cumulative concentrations below 3 mg/m3·year.


Asunto(s)
Benceno , Leucemia , Exposición Profesional , Ácido Sórbico , Benceno/toxicidad , Humanos , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Medición de Riesgo , Leucemia/inducido químicamente , Leucemia/epidemiología , China/epidemiología , Masculino , Adulto , Ácido Sórbico/análogos & derivados , Ácido Sórbico/análisis , Persona de Mediana Edad , Acetilcisteína/orina , Acetilcisteína/análogos & derivados , Femenino , Estudios de Cohortes , Incidencia
9.
Artículo en Chino | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38802311

RESUMEN

Objective: To investigate the impact of the implementation of GBZ 98-2020 "Health Requirements and Surveillance Specifications for Radiation Worker" on the results of occupational health examination for radiation workers. Methods: In April 2022, the subjects of the study were the radiation workers who underwent occupational health examination in Occupational Disease Prevention and Treatment Institute of Hefei. The radiation workers whose registration period was from May 1, 2021 to April 30, 2022 were the new standard group, and the occupational health surveillance standard was GBZ 98-2020 "Health Requirements and Surveillance Specifications for Radiation Worker". The radiationl workers registered from May 1, 2020 to April 30, 2021 were the old standard group, whose occupational health surveillance standards were GBZ 98- 2017 "Health Requirements for Radiation Workers" and GBZ 235-2011 "Specifications for Occupational Health Surveillance for Radiation Workers". To analyze whether there were differences between the two groups in the detection rate of missing items in the examination, re-examination, and the detection rate of occupational contraindications. The radiation workers whose occupational health examination results showed re-examination and/or occupational contraindications were judged to be in the unqualified group. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to find the factors affecting the determination of unqualified group. Results: The missing item detection rate of radiation workers in the new standard group was 3.04% (63/2074) , significantly higher than that in the old standard group (0.68%, 14/2054) (P<0.05) . The re-examination and occupational contraindications detection rates in the new standard group were 5.93% (123/2074) and 0.58% (12/2074) , respectively, which were significantly lower than those in the old standard group (13.83%, 284/2054) and 2.34% (48/2054) (P<0.05) . The missing item detection rate of males in the new standard group was 2.78% (40/1440) , which was significantly higher than that in the old standard group (0.72%, 11/1536) (P<0.05) . The re-examination and occupational contraindications detection rates of males in the new standard group were 3.61% (52/1440) and 0.21% (3/1440) , respectively, which were significantly lower than those in the old standard group (12.17%, 187/1536) and 2.08% (32/1536) (P<0.05) . The missing item detection rate of females in the new standard group was 3.63% (23/634) , which was significantly higher than that in the old standard group (0.58%, 3/518) (P<0.05) . The re-examination detection rate of females in the new standard group was 11.20% (71/634) , which was significantly lower than that of females in the old standard group (18.73%, 97/518) (P<0.05) . Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that gender, radiation classification, determination basis, occupational health examination category, and registration category were all influencing factors for the unqualified occupational health examination results of radiation workers (P<0.05) . Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the risk of being judged as unqualified based on the old standard was 2.466 times that of the new standard (95%CI: 1.975-3.080, P<0.05) , and the risk of being judged as unqualified for females was 1.869 times that of males (95%CI: 1.498-2.333, P<0.05) , the risk of being judged as unqualified for radiation workers during and after employment was 0.802 times that of pre-employment individuals (95%CI: 0.650-0.989, P<0.05) , and the risk of being judged as unqualified for re-examined individuals was 4.056 times that of initial examinees (95%CI: 3.161-5.203, P<0.05) . Conclusion: The results of occupational health examination of radiation workers are related to the determination basis, gender, occupational health examination category, and registration category. The implementation of GBZ 98-2020 "Health Requirements and Surveillance Specifications for Radiation Worker" may reduce the detection rate of unqualified personnel.


Asunto(s)
Salud Laboral , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad
10.
Toxicol Ind Health ; 40(7): 366-375, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38706164

RESUMEN

This paper summarizes historical asbestos exposure data collected during the handling of short-fiber chrysotile asbestos that was used as an additive to drilling fluid in oil and gas exploration. A total of 1171 industrial hygiene (IH) personal and area air samples were collected and analyzed from more than 20 drilling rigs between 1972 and 1985. The dataset consists of 1097 short-term samples (<240 min) with more than 80% having sample durations less than 30 min. Average airborne fiber concentrations measured during asbestos handling activities ranged from 0.62 f/cc to 3.39 f/cc using phase-contrast microscopy (PCM). An additional 14 samples were considered long-term samples (>240 min) and there were 60 samples with no reported sample duration. Eight-hour time-weighted average (8-h TWA) results, calculated using short-term samples, along with long-term samples greater than 240 min, did not exceed contemporaneous Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) permissible exposure limits (PELs). This analysis fills a data gap in the evaluation of asbestos exposures from the use of drilling mud additives (DMAs) that contained chrysotile asbestos.


Asunto(s)
Contaminantes Ocupacionales del Aire , Asbestos Serpentinas , Exposición Profesional , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Humanos , Contaminantes Ocupacionales del Aire/análisis , Asbestos Serpentinas/análisis , Amianto/análisis , Monitoreo del Ambiente/métodos , Industria del Petróleo y Gas
11.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 200(8): 745-754, 2024 Jun 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38702838

RESUMEN

This study analysed the occupational dose in Korean pressurized heavy-water reactors (PHWRs) and identified tasks involving high radiation exposure. The average individual dose was sufficiently low to be below the annual effective dose limit for radiation workers and is even lower than the dose limit for the general public. However, some workers received relatively higher doses than others. Furthermore, most PHWR workers are exposed to radiation during planned maintenance periods. In this study, the radiation dose was normalized (radiation dose per unit time) to determine the high-radiation-exposure tasks in Korean PHWRs. Consequently, end-fitting lapping, delayed neutron tube work and fuel channel fixed-end change tasks were identified as high-radiation-exposure tasks in Korean PHWRs. If appropriate radiation protection measures are prioritized for the identified high-dose exposure tasks, optimization of radiological protection will be effectively achieved by reducing the dose that is relatively higher than the average.


Asunto(s)
Exposición Profesional , Dosis de Radiación , Monitoreo de Radiación , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Exposición Profesional/prevención & control , Humanos , República de Corea , Monitoreo de Radiación/métodos , Monitoreo de Radiación/instrumentación , Protección Radiológica/instrumentación , Exposición a la Radiación/análisis , Reactores Nucleares , Agua
12.
Toxicology ; 505: 153833, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38759721

RESUMEN

Electronic waste (e-waste) contains numerous metals and organic pollutants that have detrimental impacts on human health. We studied 199 e-waste recycling workers and 104 non-exposed workers; analyzed blood, urine, and hair samples to measure heavy metals, hormonal, liver, and renal function. We used quantile regression models to evaluate the impact of Pb, Cd, and Hg on hormonal, liver and renal function, and the role of DNA oxidative damage in mediating the relationship between exposures and outcomes. Exposed workers had higher blood lead (Pb) (median 11.89 vs 3.63 µg/dL), similar blood cadmium (Cd) (1.04 vs 0.99 µg/L) and lower total mercury (Hg) in hair (0.38 vs 0.57 ppm) than non-exposed group. Exposed workers also had elevated median concentrations of total triiodothyronine (TT3), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), urinary albumin, albumin creatinine ratio (ACR) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were significantly higher than non-exposed group (p≤0.05). Sex hormones including luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, estrogen, progesterone and testosterone concentrations were not significantly different between exposed and non-exposed (all p≥0.05). The median concentration of ALT was 4.00 (95% CI: 0.23, 7.77), urinary albumin was 0.09 (95% CI: 0.06, 0.12) and ACR was 1.31 (95% CI: 0.57, 2.05) units higher in the exposed group compared to non-exposed group. Pb was associated with a 3.67 unit increase in the ALP (95% CI: 1.53, 5.80), 0.01 unit increase in urinary albumin (95% CI: 0.002, 0.01), and 0.07 unit increase in ACR (95% CI: 0.01, 0.13). However, no hormonal, renal, and hepatic parameters were associated with Cd or Hg. Oxidative DNA damage did not mediate exposure-outcome relationships (p≥0.05). Our data indicate e-waste exposure impairs liver and renal functions secondary to elevated Pb levels. Continuous monitoring, longitudinal studies to evaluate the dose-response relationship and effective control measure are required to protect workers from e-waste exposure.


Asunto(s)
Residuos Electrónicos , Riñón , Exposición Profesional , Humanos , Residuos Electrónicos/efectos adversos , Adulto , Masculino , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Femenino , Bangladesh/epidemiología , Riñón/efectos de los fármacos , Riñón/metabolismo , Riñón/fisiopatología , Hígado/efectos de los fármacos , Hígado/metabolismo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metales Pesados/orina , Metales Pesados/sangre , Metales Pesados/toxicidad , Reciclaje , Adulto Joven , Cadmio/sangre , Cadmio/orina , Cadmio/toxicidad , Cabello/química , Plomo/sangre , Plomo/toxicidad , Hormonas/sangre , Daño del ADN
13.
Biomed Phys Eng Express ; 10(4)2024 May 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38701767

RESUMEN

Thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) serve as compact and user-friendly tools for various applications, including personal radiation dosimetry and radiation therapy. This study explores the potential of utilizing TLD-100 personal dosimetry, conventionally applied in PET/CT (positron emission tomography/computed tomography) settings, in the PET/MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) environment. The integration of MRI into conventional radiotherapy and PET systems necessitates ionizing radiation dosimetry in the presence of static magnetic fields. In this study, TLD-100 dosimeters were exposed on the surface of a water-filled cylindrical phantom containing PET-radioisotope and positioned on the patient table of a 3 T PET/MRI, where the magnetic field strength is around 0.2 T, aiming to replicate real-world scenarios experienced by personnel in PET/MRI environments. Results indicate that the modified MR-safe TLD-100 personal dosimeters exhibit no significant impact from the static magnetic field of the 3 T PET/MRI, supporting their suitability for personal dosimetry in PET/MRI settings. This study addresses a notable gap in existing literature on the effect of MRI static magnetic field on TLDs.


Asunto(s)
Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Exposición Profesional , Fantasmas de Imagen , Dosimetría Termoluminiscente , Dosimetría Termoluminiscente/métodos , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Exposición Profesional/prevención & control , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/métodos , Dosis de Radiación , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/métodos , Monitoreo de Radiación/métodos , Campos Magnéticos , Dosímetros de Radiación
14.
J Radiol Prot ; 44(2)2024 May 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38701771

RESUMEN

Given the new recommendations for occupational eye lens doses, various lead glasses have been used to reduce irradiation of interventional radiologists. However, the protection afforded by lead glasses over prescription glasses (thus over-glasses-type eyewear) has not been considered in detail. We used a phantom to compare the protective effects of such eyewear and regular eyewear of 0.07 mm lead-equivalent thickness. The shielding rates behind the eyewear and on the surface of the left eye of an anthropomorphic phantom were calculated. The left eye of the phantom was irradiated at various angles and the shielding effects were evaluated. We measured the radiation dose to the left side of the phantom using RPLDs attached to the left eye and to the surface/back of the left eyewear. Over-glasses-type eyewear afforded good protection against x-rays from the left and below; the average shielding rates on the surface of the left eye ranged from 0.70-0.72. In clinical settings, scattered radiation is incident on physicians' eyes from the left and below, and through any gap in lead glasses. Over-glasses-type eyewear afforded better protection than regular eyewear of the same lead-equivalent thickness at the irradiation angles of concern in clinical settings. Although clinical evaluation is needed, we suggest over-glasses-type Pb eyewear even for physicians who do not wear prescription glasses.


Asunto(s)
Dispositivos de Protección de los Ojos , Anteojos , Exposición Profesional , Dosis de Radiación , Protección Radiológica , Humanos , Exposición Profesional/prevención & control , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Fantasmas de Imagen , Ojo/efectos de la radiación , Traumatismos por Radiación/prevención & control
15.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0300980, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38728311

RESUMEN

In this cross-sectional study, we determined the relative impact of long-term occupational exposure to pesticides on physical performance and perception of tiredness. Experimental data was collected in locus from agricultural communities and included surveys to assess the duration of exposure to pesticides, social status, habitual physical activity levels, presence of common mental disorders (CMD), and self-reported tiredness. Plasmatic cholinesterase (PChE), body composition and traditional functional performance tests (Handgrip strength-HGS; Time up and go-TUG; and Sit-to-stand-STS) were obtained. From the 127 individuals tested, cluster analysis yielded 80 individuals divided in Direct Exposed (n = 37) and Indirect Exposed (n = 43); Tired (n = 16), and Not Tired (n = 64). PChE values were within the reference values (5209.64-13943.53 U/L). Pesticide exposure had no influence on PChE levels, CMD or fatigue (p > 0.05), while Self-reported tiredness had (p < 0.05). Principal Component Analyses showed that HGS; STS and TUG (i.e., physical performance variables) are negatively influenced by two independent factors: pesticide exposure and self-reported tiredness. We conclude that chronic pesticide exposure and tiredness can negatively impact physical performance, independently, without clinically significant changes in PChE levels that is a biomarker used to track pesticide intoxication. Functional physical tests can be a useful tool to identify chronic pesticide exposure, and help with the limitations of commonly used parameters (i.e. PChE and CMD). Self-reported tiredness is a confounding variable.


Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores , Exposición Profesional , Plaguicidas , Humanos , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Masculino , Adulto , Femenino , Estudios Transversales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Biomarcadores/sangre , Fatiga/inducido químicamente , Fuerza de la Mano , Colinesterasas/sangre , Rendimiento Físico Funcional
16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38821677

RESUMEN

The article by Ceppi and colleagues, Genotoxic Effects of Occupational Exposure to, Glass Fibres - A Human Biomonitoring Study, published in Mutation Research -Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis in 2023 was reviewed with great interest. The authors undertook a novel approach to conducting a biomonitoring study of genotoxicity markers among a population of glass fibre manufacturing workers in Slovakia. On the surface, the Ceppi et al. (2023) study provides an interesting application of genotoxicity markers among a human population of workers to explore potential markers of effect (DNA strand breaks) and potential risk of susceptibility (e.g., genetic damage, disease, death). However, limited data for exposure reconstruction, uncertain influences from smoking history, and lack of consideration of decades of human epidemiology research showing no increased risk of malignant or non-malignant respiratory disease and mortality among glass fibre manufacturing workers, reveals that the conclusions of the authors are overreaching and inconsistent with the existing science. The limitations of this study preclude the ability to draw causal inferences or conclusions about DNA strand breaks as a marker of exposure, effect, or susceptibility within this population of Slovakian glass fibre workers. Further longitudinal research is required (e.g., more robust temporal assessment of occupational exposures - fibres and other compounds - and smoking history) to support the study conclusions.


Asunto(s)
Monitoreo Biológico , Vidrio , Exposición Profesional , Humanos , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Eslovaquia/epidemiología , Monitoreo Biológico/métodos , Daño del ADN/efectos de los fármacos , Mutágenos/toxicidad , Pruebas de Mutagenicidad
17.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; 5: CD015158, 2024 05 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38695617

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Asbestos exposure can lead to asbestos-related diseases. The European Union (EU) has adopted regulations for workplaces where asbestos is present. The EU occupational exposure limit (OEL) for asbestos is 0.1 fibres per cubic centimetre of air (f/cm3) as an eight-hour average. Different types of personal protective equipment (PPE) are available to provide protection and minimise exposure; however, their effectiveness is unclear. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of personal protective equipment (PPE), including donning and doffing procedures and individual hygienic behaviour, compared to no availability and use of such equipment or alternative equipment, on asbestos exposure in workers in asbestos demolition and repair work. SEARCH METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and Scopus (September 2022), and we checked the reference lists of included studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included studies that measured asbestos concentration outside and inside PPE (considering outside concentration a surrogate for no PPE), exposure to asbestos after doffing PPE, donning and doffing errors, nonadherence to regulations, and adverse effects of PPE. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors selected studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using ROBINS-I. We categorised PPE as full-face filtering masks, supplied air respirators (SARs), and powered air-purifying respirators (PAPRs). Values for asbestos outside and inside PPE were transformed to logarithmic values for random-effects meta-analysis. Pooled logarithmic mean differences (MDs) were exponentiated to obtain the ratio of means (RoM) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI). The RoM shows the degree of protection provided by the respirators (workplace protection factor). Since the RoM is likely to be much higher at higher outside concentrations, we presented separate results according to the outside asbestos concentration, as follows. • Below 0.01 f/cm3 (band 1) • 0.01 f/cm3 to below 0.1 f/cm3 (band 2) • 0.1 f/cm3 to below 1 f/cm3 (band 3) • 1 f/cm3 to below 10 f/cm3 (band 4) • 10 f/cm3 to below 100 f/cm3 (band 5) • 100 f/cm3 to below 1000 f/cm3 (band 6) Additionally, we determined whether the inside concentrations per respirator and concentration band complied with the current EU OEL (0.1 f/cm3) and proposed EU OEL (0.01 f/cm3). MAIN RESULTS: We identified six studies that measured asbestos concentrations outside and inside respiratory protective equipment (RPE) and one cross-over study that compared the effect of two different coveralls on body temperature. No studies evaluated the remaining predefined outcomes. Most studies were at overall moderate risk of bias due to insufficient reporting. The cross-over study was at high risk of bias. Full-face filtering masks Two studies evaluated full-face filtering masks. They provided insufficient data for band 1 and band 6. The results for the remaining bands were as follows. • Band 2: RoM 19 (95% CI 17.6 to 20.1; 1 study, 3 measurements; moderate certainty) • Band 3: RoM 69 (95% CI 26.6 to 175.9; 2 studies, 17 measurements; very low certainty) • Band 4: RoM 455 (95% CI 270.4 to 765.1; 1 study, 16 measurements; low certainty) • Band 5: RoM 2752 (95% CI 1236.5 to 6063.2;1 study, 3 measurements; low certainty) The inside measurements in band 5 did not comply with the EU OEL of 0.1 f/cm3, and no inside measurements complied with the proposed EU OEL of 0.01 f/cm3. Supplied air respirators Two studies evaluated supplied air respirators. They provided no data for band 6. The results for the remaining bands were as follows. • Band 1: RoM 11 (95% CI 7.6 to 14.9; 1 study, 134 measurements; moderate certainty) • Band 2: RoM 63 (95% CI 43.8 to 90.9; 1 study, 17 measurements; moderate certainty) • Band 3: RoM 528 (95% CI 368.7 to 757.5; 1 study, 38 measurements; moderate certainty) • Band 4: RoM 4638 (95% CI 3071.7 to 7044.5; 1 study, 49 measurements; moderate certainty) • Band 5: RoM 26,134 (16,647.2 to 41,357.1; 1 study, 22 measurements; moderate certainty) All inside measurements complied with the current OEL of 0.1 f/cm3 and the proposed OEL of 0.01 f/cm3. Powered air-purifying respirators Three studies evaluated PAPRs. The results per band were as follows. • Band 1: RoM 8 (95% CI 3.7 to 19.1; 1 study, 23 measurements; moderate certainty) • Band 2: RoM 90 (95% CI 64.7 to 126.5; 1 study, 17 measurements; moderate certainty) • Band 3: RoM 104 (95% CI 23.1 to 464.1; 3 studies, 14 measurements; very low certainty) • Band 4: RoM 706 (95% CI 219.2 to 2253.0; 2 studies, 43 measurements; very low certainty) • Band 5: RoM 1366 (544.6 to 3428.9; 2 studies, 8 measurements; low certainty) • Band 6: RoM 18,958 (95% CI 4023.9 to 90,219.4; 2 studies, 13 measurements; very low certainty) All inside measurements complied with the 0.1 f/cm3 OEL when the outside concentration was below 10 f/cm3 (band 1 to band 4). From band 3, no measurements complied with the proposed OEL of 0.01 f/cm3. Different types of coveralls One study reported the adverse effects of coveralls. A polyethylene suit may increase the body temperature more than a ventilated impermeable polyvinyl (PVC) coverall, but the evidence is very uncertain (MD 0.17 °C, 95% CI -0.08 to 0.42; 1 study, 11 participants; very low certainty). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Where the outside asbestos concentration is below 0.1 f/cm3, SARS and PAPRs likely reduce exposure to below the proposed OEL of 0.01 f/cm3. For outside concentrations up to 10 f/cm3, all respirators may reduce exposure below the current OEL, but only SAR also below the proposed OEL. In band 5 (10 to < 100 f/cm3), full-face filtering masks may not reduce asbestos exposure below either OEL, SARs likely reduce exposure below both OELs, and there were no data for PAPRs. In band 6 (100 f/cm3 to < 1000 f/cm3), PAPRs may not reduce exposure below either OEL, and there were no data for full-face filtering masks or SARs. Some coveralls may increase body temperature more than others. Randomised studies are needed to directly compare PAPRs and SARs at higher asbestos concentrations and to assess adverse effects. Future studies should assess the effects of doffing procedures.


Asunto(s)
Amianto , Exposición Profesional , Equipo de Protección Personal , Humanos , Amianto/análisis , Amianto/efectos adversos , Exposición Profesional/prevención & control , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Dispositivos de Protección Respiratoria , Sesgo , Máscaras
18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38791733

RESUMEN

Health surveillance guides public policies, allows for the monitoring of occupational exposures that may cause health risks, and can prevent work-related diseases. The scoping review protocol herein is designed to map studies on the surveillance of occupational exposure to volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in gas stations and identify the governmental agencies and public health measures in different countries. This review protocol is based on the Joanna Briggs Institute manual and guided by the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews. It includes research articles, theses, dissertations, and official documents on surveillance measures for occupational exposure to VOCs (i.e., benzene, ethylbenzene, toluene, and xylene) in gas stations from different countries. All languages and publication dates will be considered, and a spreadsheet will be used to extract and analyze qualitative and quantitative data. The final version will present the main surveillance measures implemented, responsible entities, results, challenges, limitations, and potential gaps in gas stations.


Asunto(s)
Monitoreo del Ambiente , Exposición Profesional , Compuestos Orgánicos Volátiles , Compuestos Orgánicos Volátiles/análisis , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Humanos , Monitoreo del Ambiente/métodos , Contaminantes Ocupacionales del Aire/análisis
19.
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf ; 278: 116349, 2024 Jun 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38714081

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Exposures to polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) contribute to cancer in the fire service. Fire investigators are involved in evaluations of post-fire scenes. In the US, it is estimated that there are up to 9000 fire investigators, compared to approximately 1.1 million total firefighting personnel. This exploratory study contributes initial evidence of PAH exposures sustained by this understudied group using worn silicone passive samplers. OBJECTIVES: Evaluate PAH exposures sustained by fire investigators at post-fire scenes using worn silicone passive samplers. Assess explanatory factors and health risks of PAH exposure at post-fire scenes. METHODS: As part of a cross-sectional study design, silicone wristbands were distributed to 16 North Carolina fire investigators, including eight public, seven private, and one public and private. Wristbands were worn during 46 post-fire scene investigations. Fire investigators completed pre- and post-surveys providing sociodemographic, occupational, and post-fire scene characteristics. Solvent extracts from wristbands were analyzed via gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Results were used to estimate vapor-phase PAH concentration in the air at post-fire scenes. RESULTS: Fire investigations lasted an average of 148 minutes, standard deviation ± 93 minutes. A significant positive correlation (r=0.455, p<.001) was found between investigation duration and PAH concentrations on wristbands. Significantly greater time-normalized PAH exposures (p=0.039) were observed for investigations of newer post-fire scenes compared to older post-fire scenes. Regulatory airborne PAH exposure limits were exceeded in six investigations, based on exposure to estimated vapor-phase PAH concentrations in the air at post-fire scenes. DISCUSSION: Higher levels of off-gassing and suspended particulates at younger post-fire scenes may explain greater PAH exposure. Weaker correlations are found between wristband PAH concentration and investigation duration at older post-fire scenes, suggesting reduction of off-gassing PAHs over time. Exceedances of regulatory PAH limits indicate a need for protection against vapor-phase contaminants, especially at more recent post-fire scenes.


Asunto(s)
Bomberos , Exposición Profesional , Hidrocarburos Policíclicos Aromáticos , Siliconas , Humanos , Hidrocarburos Policíclicos Aromáticos/análisis , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Estudios Transversales , North Carolina , Adulto , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Monitoreo del Ambiente/métodos , Contaminantes Ocupacionales del Aire/análisis , Cromatografía de Gases y Espectrometría de Masas , Muñeca
20.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 200(8): 802-807, 2024 Jun 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38773775

RESUMEN

Interventional cardiology is characterized by high radiation exposure for both the patient and the operator. Adequate shielding and monitoring of the operator are fundamental to comply with radiation protection principles. In a previous work, the effect on the dose of the dosemeter position on the chest was studied. In this paper, the investigation has been completed, employing an anthropomorphic thorax phantom, equipped with arms. Although there are differences between the Monte Carlo simulations and the measurements, similar trends are observed, showing that the reduction in dose, due to the arms, is between 20 and 60%, compared with the situation without arms. For that reason, considering a dosemeter placed on the chest, the upper position, which is the least affected by the arms, should be preferred while the extreme lateral position, near the armpit, should be avoided.


Asunto(s)
Simulación por Computador , Método de Montecarlo , Exposición Profesional , Fantasmas de Imagen , Ropa de Protección , Dosis de Radiación , Monitoreo de Radiación , Protección Radiológica , Humanos , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Exposición Profesional/prevención & control , Protección Radiológica/métodos , Monitoreo de Radiación/métodos , Cardiología/métodos , Cuerpo Médico , Tórax/efectos de la radiación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA