Prospective observational study on the efficacy and tolerability of a complex of phytochemicals versus dutasteride in the treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptomps due to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of our study was to treat 2 similar groups of patients suffering from BPH: one group with a complex based on phycocyanin, PEA and selenium; the other group with dutasteride. So the effectiveness of these treatments was checked, especially regarding the improvement of LUTS and the reduction of PSA and prostate volume. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included 104 patients in the study. All patients aged between 50 and 70 years, PSA values between 4 and 10 ng/ml, prostate volume calculated by transrectal ultrasound between 50 and 70 cc, flowmetry with maximum flow value greater than or equal to 10 ml/s, no suspicious nodules on DRE, no suspicious lesions on MRI (PI-RADS 1-2), negative previous prostatic biopsies or never bioptied, moreover absence of diabetes mellitus or chronic renal failure (blood creatinine >2 mg/dl). We considered: -Group A of 54 men who used the complex; -Group B of 50 patients treated with dutasteride. Then we controlled all patients 6 months after starting therapy, considering the following parameters: PSA, prostate volume, flowmetry. RESULTS: Our results showed that both dutasteride and complex decreased PSA levels (both had a p<0.0001), with a more significant contribution of dutasteride (mean decrease of -2.743 ng/ml vs -0.971 ng/ml). Uroflowmetry also improved with both ( p<0.0001) with a mean increase in maximum flow of urine of + 3.03 ml/min for the former and + 13.02 ml/min for the latter. Lastly, dutasteride proved to be highly effective on reducing the prostate volume on TRUS (- 22.14 ml, p<0.0001) compared to Ficoxpea, which showed a mean decrease of - 10.04 ml (p<0.0001). Moreover the consistent reduction in prostate volume obtained through the use of dutasteride proved to be more intense than the one obtained by using the complex even in statistical analysis (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Both Ficoxpea and Dutasteride showed reduction of PSA values after 6 months of treatment. The complex based on phycocyanin, PEA and selenium showed a statistically significant improvement in urinary flow, while dutasteride acts more on the volume of the prostate. However, the natural complex is a product with good efficacy on the phlogistic component and does not have the side effects of dutasteride (e.g. gynecomastia, reduced libido). Therefore, we believe it can be used by a large part of the population, in order to reduce LUTS and PSA and improve urinary flow, without side effects.

Thermo-expandable intraprostatic nitinol stents in the treatment of bladder outlet obstruction: a consecutive case series.

OBJECTIVE: In high-risk patients, prostatic stents may alleviate obstruction at the prostate level. Since 2020 we have used thermo-expandable intraprostatic nitinol stents. Here we document outcomes through the first years with the procedure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We reviewed  patients who had undergone stent treatment between May 2020 and October 2023. Patient and procedural data, urinary symptoms, complications and side effects were recorded. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize outcomes and we evaluated predictors of success and complications using robust multiple regression analyses. RESULTS: We included 52 consecutive patients with a median age of 82 years (range 71-96) and a median Charlson Comorbidity Index of 6 (3-11). Forty-seven men used indwelling catheters, two used clean intermittent catheterization, and three had severe lower urinary tract symptoms. Stents were placed under general anesthesia, sedation, and local anesthesia in 39, 4, and 9 men, respectively. The median treatment time was 14 min (range 8-40). One complication, in the form of an infection requiring IV antibiotics, occurred. Subsequently, 45 men (87%) were able to void spontaneously without bothersome symptoms. After a median of 11 (2-44) months, 8 men had their stents removed due to recurring symptoms. This gives an overall success rate of 37/52 patients (71%). No predictors of success or complications were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Thermo-expandable intraprostatic nitinol stents demonstrate a high success rate with a low risk of complications and may serve as an alternative to permanent or intermittent catheterization for men who are unable or unwilling to undergo flow-improving surgery.

The Role of Transurethral BPH Surgeries in Management of Urinary Symptoms in Prostate Cancer Patients, Narrative Review.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Prostate cancer and benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) are two ubiquitous pathologies that may coexist. A significant percentage of patients with different stages of prostate cancer suffer lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to associated BPH. We aimed to review the literature regarding the role of transurethral surgeries in the management of prostate cancer patients and the different available management options. RECENT FINDINGS: The evidence in literature for the use of BPH surgeries in prostate cancer patients is based mainly on low-quality retrospective studies. In patients on active surveillance, BPH surgeries are beneficial in relieving LUTS without oncological risk and can eliminate the contribution of adenoma to PSA level. In patients with advanced prostate cancer, palliative BPH surgery can relieve LUTS and urinary retention with unclear oncological impact; however some reports depict that the need for BPH surgery in advanced prostate cancer is associated with poorer prognosis. In patients receiving radiotherapy, various studies showed that transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) is associated with increased radiotoxicity despite some recent reports encouraging the use of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) to improve urinary symptom scores before radiotherapy. The most commonly reported techniques utilized are TURP, photoselective vaporization of prostate (PVP) and HoLEP. The use of BPH surgery is justified for relieving LUTS in selected prostate cancer patients on active surveillance or in advanced stages, however the use in the pre-radiotherapy settings remains controversial. Future prospective and randomized controlled trials are required for validating the benefits and assessing potential hazards.

Evaluating the efficacy and safety of Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate in patients with obstructive uropathy attributable to bladder outlet obstruction.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate outcomes of Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) in individuals presenting with obstructive-uropathy (OU) attributable to bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent HoLEP from August 2017 to January 2023 at our institution. We identified patients with preoperative OU defined by presence of chronic hydronephrosis suggestive of BOO and conducted a matched-pair analysis (1:2) with patients undergoing HoLEP without OU. Patients' demographic, perioperative and postoperative voiding parameters, serum creatinine level, and complications were analyzed up to one-year of follow-up. RESULTS: Preoperative OU was present in 42 patients. Demographic and preoperative parameters were comparable except median preoperative creatinine (1.245 vs. 1.065 ng/ml, p < 0.001) and catheterization rates (76.2% vs. 25%, p < 0.001) were higher in the OU group. The mean duration of postoperative catheterization was longer in the OU group (3.83 vs. 2.26 days, p = 0.048). Two patients in the OU group developed postoperative acute kidney injury. There was no difference in the rate of postoperative complications, improvement in International Prostate Symptom Score and maximum urinary flow amongst both groups except a higher post-void residual volume at 3- and 12-months (p = 0.001 and p = 0.037, respectively) in OU patients. Patients noted significant improvement in serum creatinine level at 6-12 weeks postoperatively from peak baseline level (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: HoLEP is effective and safe in patients with OU suggestive of BOO, though they are at higher risk of postoperative acute kidney injury.

Recent Advancements in Prostate Catheters and Stents for Management of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The prevalence of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is rising, however, current treatment options present severe complications and limit patient's quality of life. Accordingly, advancements in prostatic catheter and stent designs for use in treating lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in BPH patients have largely expanded in the past five years and we aim to provide an exhaustive summary of recent outcomes. RECENT FINDINGS: The dual dilation and paxlitaxel eluting Optilume BPH Catheter System enhances promise in catheter-based treatments, providing the longest sustained increase in max urinary flow rate and decrease in post-void residual volume compared to alternative MISTs. Additionally, use of iTiND, along with recent advancements in temporary (EXIME, Prodeon Urocross) and permanent (Zenflow Spring, Butterfly, and ClearRing) stent designs, have demonstrated rapid, lasting, and low-cost LUTS relief with sustained sexual function. Minimally invasive solutions that offer in-office treatment, rapid symptom relief, shorter recovery times, and preservation of sexual function hold great promise in improving outcomes in managing BPH patients with LUTS.

Ejaculation preserving TURP (Ep-TURP): A viable alternative in sexually active males with BOO-a single centre prospective randomized study.

INTRODUCTION: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common urological condition, particularly among middle-aged and elderly men. Trans urethral resection of prostate (TURP) has some drawbacks, particularly concerning ejaculatory function. Ejaculation preserving TURP (Ep-TURP) is one such technique that aims at preserving the tissues that are primarily responsible for antegrade ejaculation. METHODS AND MATERIAL: In this prospective study, patients with bothersome LUTS were randomized into Ep-TURP and standard TURP groups. Supramontal tissue was preserved in Ep-TURP while standard TURP group had resection of the entire prostatic tissue up to the verumontanum. The outcomes with regard to IPSS, Qmax, IIEF(Q9), Ejaculation and PVR were studied. Ejaculation projection score was separately calculated and assessed. RESULTS: About 60 patients were studied, with 30 in each group. At 6 months' follow-up, complication rates were the same in both groups. The IPSS, Qmax, IIEF were similar and comparable. There was no change in erection in all patients (P = 0.559). The ejaculation was well preserved in Ep-TURP (p<0.001). Ejaculation projection score was maintained at 3.77 in the Ep-TURP group while in the standard group it was 0 (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Ep-TURP is a safe and a cost-effective method of preserving ejaculation in patients undergoing TURP. This procedure adds a better quality of life that greatly aids in enhancing the improving his psychological outlook towards life. Ep-TURP has now emerged as the standard procedure of choice in sexually active young males needing TURP, as the degree of ejaculation is largely well preserved in patients undergoing this procedure.

Functional outcomes following external beam radiation therapy for patients with prior holmium laser enucleation of the prostate.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND: Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is an increasingly popular size-independent technique of treating male voiding dysfunction due to benign prostatic hypertrophy. Some patients after HoLEP may develop clinically significant prostate cancer and opt for definitive treatment with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). Little is known about the safety of EBRT after HoLEP and how it may functionally impact voiding after HoLEP has altered the anatomy of the prostate. Our study aimed to assess patient-reported voiding outcomes following EBRT after HoLEP with a focus on incontinence related patient outcomes. METHODS/MATERIALS: This study was conducted with approval from our hospital's institutional review board. Patients that underwent HoLEP followed by EBRT were identified and data were collected in a retrospective nature from a single surgeon HoLEP cohort over the past 4 years (2019-2023). Patient demographics, disease and radiation therapy characteristics, radiation therapy, and baseline voiding symptoms were recorded. Current functional voiding outcomes were also collected via phone-call or portal communication in a cross-sectional manner with questions pertaining to type of incontinence, IPSS quality of life score, and administration of the Michigan incontinence symptom index (M-ISI). Adverse events encountered during follow-up were recorded. RESULTS: 24 patients were identified who received RT for prostate cancer after HoLEP with an average age of 73.6 (± 5.3). One third of patients reported no incontinence whatsoever after radiation and of those who experienced incontinence, the majority felt that it was not worsened after radiation. Median IPSS QoL score following radiation was 1 (range 0-6), median M-ISI Severity Score was 4 out of a maximum of 32, and median M-ISI bother score was 0 out of a maximum of 8. One patient developed a bladder neck contracture (BNC) approximately 1 year following his radiation therapy (approximately 18 months after HoLEP) causing bothersome incontinence and LUTS. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort most patients who received RT after HoLEP reported a high urinary-symptom related quality of life and a low rate of urinary incontinence. One patient who received SBRT suffered a BNC which is a known adverse event with RT but given our small sample size it remains unclear if the risk is higher in patients receiving RT after HoLEP. Larger studies should focus on examining the rate of bladder neck contracture in patients receiving RT after HoLEP, particularly focusing on whether the degree of dose fractionation may impact their development.

Predictors of Postoperative Urinary Incontinence After Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) for Surgeons Early in Their Experience.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate factors impacting continence recovery following holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) for surgeons early in their HoLEP experience. METHODS: Predefined factors were evaluated from a prospectively maintained database for their impact on the recovery of continence after HoLEP. Both surgeons had performed fewer than 150 HoLEPs as attending physicians. Inclusion criteria were subjects with at least 6 months of incontinence data or documented recovery of continence. One or fewer pads per day was defined as continence. Statistical analyses were performed using R and Prism and included Spearman correlations, linear modeling, and Mantel-Cox log-rank testing as appropriate. RESULTS: From December 2020 to May 2023, 152 subjects met inclusion criteria with a median age of 70 (range: 51-93). The median case number was 56 (1-146). Within the study period, 144/152 (94.7%) recovered continence at a median of 1.6 months postoperatively. Linear modeling demonstrated that younger age (p = 0.01) and shorter enucleation time (p = 0.001) predicted recovery. Enucleation time less than 100 min predicted earlier continence recovery based on Mantel-Cox testing (p = 0.0004). CONCLUSIONS: During the surgeons' HoLEP learning curve, age, and enucleation time were predictive of the recovery of continence. Enucleation time under 100 min predicted a faster rate of continence recovery. The relationship between enucleation time and continence recovery may be demonstrative of case difficulty or may be a result of pressure on the external urethral sphincter during enucleation. These findings further our understanding of HoLEP outcomes early in a surgeon's learning curve.

Androgenic Alopecia Is Associated With More Severe Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Secondary to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the possible association between androgenic alopecia (AGA) and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHODS: A total of 148 patients aged over 45 with LUTS secondary to BPH were prospectively enrolled in this study. According to the Norwood-Hamilton classification, the patients were divided into two groups: AGA (n = 69) and non-AGA (n = 79). In addition, the cases of AGA were categorized as vertex (n = 39) and frontal baldness (n = 30). The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), uroflowmetry parameters, prostate volume, serum total testosterone (TT), and free and total prostate-specific antigen concentrations of all patients were assessed and compared between the groups. Correlations between the AGA grade and other variables were also investigated. RESULTS: The serum TT level (354 ± 97.1 vs. 308.6 ± 73.1 ng/dL, p = 0.01), total IPSS (16.1 ± 8.1 vs. 13.4 ± 7.7, p = 0.04), IPSS storage subscore (IPSS-S) (7.1 ± 3.5 vs. 5.8 ± 3.6, p = 0.03), and number of nocturia episodes (2.5 ± 1.4 vs. 1.8 ± 1.4, p < 0.01) were significantly higher in the AGA group than in the non-AGA group. There were no significant differences in any of the parameters between the patients with vertex and frontal baldness. The AGA grade showed a significant positive correlation with the TT level (r = 0.407, p = 0.003), IPSS-S (r = 0.164, p = 0.04), and number of nocturia episodes (r = 0.203, p = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that among patients with LUTS, those with AGA had worse symptoms and higher TT levels compared with those without AGA of similar age. Furthermore, the AGA grade was positively correlated with the TT level and storage symptoms.

Non-inferiority, randomised, open-label clinical trial on the effectiveness of transurethral microwave thermotherapy compared to prostatic artery embolisation in reducing severe lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia: study protocol for the TUMT-PAE-1 trial.

BACKGROUND: One-fourth of men older than 70 years have lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) that impair their quality of life. Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is considered the gold standard for surgical treatment of LUTS caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) that cannot be managed conservatively or pharmacologically. However, TURP is only an option for patients fit for surgery and can result in complications. Transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) and prostatic artery embolisation (PAE) are alternative minimally invasive surgical therapies (MISTs) performed in an outpatient setting. Both treatments have shown to reduce LUTS with a similar post-procedure outcome in mean International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). It is however still unknown if TUMT and PAE perform equally well as they have never been directly compared in a randomised clinical trial. The objective of this clinical trial is to assess if PAE is non-inferior to TUMT in reducing LUTS secondary to BPH. METHODS: This study is designed as a multicentre, non-inferiority, open-label randomised clinical trial. Patients will be randomised with a 1:1 allocation ratio between treatments. The primary outcome is the IPSS of the two arms after 6 months. The primary outcome will be evaluated using a 95% confidence interval against the predefined non-inferiority margin of + 3 points in IPSS. Secondary objectives include the comparison of patient-reported and functional outcomes at short- and long-term follow-up. We will follow the patients for 5 years to track long-term effect. Assuming a difference in mean IPSS after treatment of 1 point with an SD of 5 and a non-inferiority margin set at the threshold for a clinically non-meaningful difference of + 3 points, the calculated sample size was 100 patients per arm. To compensate for 10% dropout, the study will include 223 patients. DISCUSSION: In this first randomised clinical trial to compare two MISTs, we expect non-inferiority of PAE to TUMT. The most prominent problems with MIST BPH treatments are the unknown long-term effect and the lack of proper selection of candidates for a specific procedure. With analysis of the secondary outcomes, we aspire to contribute to a better understanding of durability and provide knowledge to guide treatment decisions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05686525. Registered on January 17, 2023, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05686525 .

Efficiency of HoLEP in patients with detrusor underactivity and renal dysfunction secondary to BPO.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the bladder and renal functional outcomes of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) in patients with benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) complicated by detrusor underactivity (DU) and secondary renal dysfunction. METHODS: Thirty-one patients were included in this prospective study. Eligible patients had urinary retention, a bladder outlet obstruction index (BOOI) greater than 40, a bladder contractility index (BCI) less than 100, abnormal renal function at the initial diagnosis (serum creatinine > 132 µmol/L) and a renal pelvis anteroposterior diameter (PRAPD) > 1.5 cm bilaterally. All patients underwent HoLEP in a routine manner and were evaluated preoperatively and at 1, 3 and 6 months after surgery. The baseline characteristics of the patients, perioperative data, postoperative outcomes and complications were assessed. RESULTS: Significant improvement was observed in the international prostate symptom score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL) score, maximal urinary flow rate (Qmax), post-void residual volume (PVR), Scr and RPAPD at the 6-month follow-up. Bladder wall thickness (BWT) exhibited a decreasing trend but did not significantly differ from the preoperative values. No grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred, and grade 3 and lower complications were treated conservatively. Three patients required reinsertion of indwelling catheters, and they were able to void spontaneously after two weeks of catheterisation training and medication treatment. CONCLUSION: HoLEP is an effective treatment for men with BPO accompanied by DU and consequent renal function impairment. Patients are able to regain spontaneous voiding. Both bladder and renal functions were preserved and improved.

Global burden of benign prostatic hyperplasia, urinary tract infections, urolithiasis, bladder cancer, kidney cancer, and prostate cancer from 1990 to 2021.

BACKGROUND: The burden of common urologic diseases, including benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), urinary tract infections (UTI), urolithiasis, bladder cancer, kidney cancer, and prostate cancer, varies both geographically and within specific regions. It is essential to conduct a comprehensive and precise assessment of the global burden of urologic diseases. METHODS: We obtained data on incidence, prevalence, mortality, and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for the aforementioned urologic diseases by age, sex, location, and year from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2021. We analyzed the burden associated with urologic diseases based on socio-demographic index (SDI) and attributable risk factors. The trends in burden over time were assessed using estimated annual percentage changes (EAPC) along with a 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: In 2021, BPH and UTI were the leading causes of age-standardized incidence rate (ASIR) and age-standardized prevalence rate (ASPR), with rates of 5531.88 and 2782.59 per 100,000 persons, respectively. Prostate cancer was the leading cause of both age-standardized mortality rate (ASMR) and age-standardized DALYs rate (ASDR), with rates of 12.63 and 217.83 per 100,000 persons, respectively. From 1990 to 2021, there was an upward trend in ASIR, ASPR, ASMR, and ASDR for UTI, while urolithiasis showed a downward trend. The middle and low-middle SDI quintile levels exhibited higher incidence, prevalence, mortality, and DALYs related to UTI, urolithiasis, and BPH, while the high and high-middle SDI quintile levels showed higher rates for the three cancers. The burden of these six urologic diseases displayed diverse age and sex distribution patterns. In 2021, a high body mass index (BMI) contributed to 20.07% of kidney cancer deaths worldwide, while smoking accounted for 26.48% of bladder cancer deaths and 3.00% of prostate cancer deaths. CONCLUSIONS: The global burden of 6 urologic diseases presents a significant public health challenge. Urgent international collaboration is essential to advance the improvement of urologic disease management, encompassing the development of effective diagnostic screening tools and the implementation of high-quality prevention and treatment strategies.

Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP) and concomitant inguinal hernioplasty: a single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a prevalent condition in aging males, leading to bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) and associated urinary symptoms. With increasing life expectancy, the incidence of BPH and its co-morbidities, like inguinal hernia, has risen. This study explores the efficacy of combining transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and inguinal hernioplasty in a single surgical session to address both conditions, potentially reducing the need for multiple hospitalizations and surgical interventions. METHODS: This retrospective study at Chi Mei Medical Center included patients from 2014 to 2023 who underwent concurrent TURP and inguinal hernioplasty. A total of 85 patients met the criteria defined for this study. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative characteristics were meticulously documented. Outcomes evaluated included the duration of the surgery, incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications, duration of Foley catheterization, length of hospital stay, and treatment efficacy. Additionally, we conducted a comparative assessment of the surgical outcomes between two distinct techniques for inguinal hernia repair: open hernioplasty and laparoscopic hernioplasty (LH). RESULTS: In 85 patients who met the criteria, the mean age was 71.1 ± 7.8 years. The study reported no significant intraoperative complications, and postoperative care was focused on monitoring for blood loss, infection, and managing pain. The average postoperative hospital stay was 2.9 ± 1.0 days and the mean duration of catheterization was 51.6 ± 16.7 h, with a minimal complication rate observed during the one-year follow-up. A significant reduction in both operative duration and catheterization interval was observed in patients undergoing LH as opposed to those receiving open hernioplasty. CONCLUSION: Concurrent TURP and inguinal hernioplasty effectively manage BOO due to BPH and inguinal hernias with minimal complications, suggesting a viable approach to reducing hospital stays and surgical interventions. Laparoscopic techniques, in particular, offer benefits in operative efficiency and recovery time, making combined surgery a feasible option for selected patients.

UroLift to preserve seminal parameters in young male with LUTS from BPH.

PURPOSE: Prostatic urethral lift has been an effective ejaculation sparing treatment for benign prostatic hypertrophy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect on male semen parameters. METHODS: Between July 2014 and January 2022, 20 young men with urinary symptoms of BPH, unresponsive to drug treatment and motivated to preserve ejaculation for eventual paternity, underwent UroLift. Semen analysis was performed before and 6 month after surgery with evaluation of pH, volume, sperm concentration, total motility, vitality and morphology according to WHO 2011. All underwent digital rectal examination, transrectal prostate ultrasound to measure prostate volume, PSA, uroflowmetry, cystoscopy and urodynamics test if necessary. Objective and subjective urinary function was scheduled at 1, 3, 6, 12 month than yearly with UFM, IPSS, IIEF-5, and MSHQ-EjD-SF. RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 36 month (range 12 to 63), no retroejaculation or changes in seminal parameters occurred. Mean age was 44.5 (range 36.5 to 48) years. Mean operative time was 15 (range 10 to 20) min and 2.5 (range 2 to 4) implants per patients were used. At 6 month there were no difference in terms of total sperm count, volume, pH, motility, vitality, morphology, liquefaction, leucocytes (p = 0.9; p = 0.8; p = 0.7; p = 1; p = 1; p = 1; p = 0,2; p = 0.5). At last, Q-max increased by 64.4% (p = 0.001), post-void residual volume decreased by 66.6% (p = 0.016), and IPSS decreased by 60% (p < 0.001). IIEF and MSHQ-EjD-SF were preserved (p = 0.14, p = 0.4). CONCLUSIONS: UroLift appears safe technique to correct LUTS from BPH in young men desirous to preserve seminal analysis.

Ejaculatory-sparing transurethral prostatectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

INTRODUCTION: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a prevalent urologic condition leading to lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Transurethral prostatectomy has been a cornerstone for surgical management of LUTS due to BPH. A growing interest has recently emerged to develop a surgical approach that can decrease the effect on sexual and ejaculatory functions while maintaining its efficacy in treating LUTS. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this meta-analysis is to assess patient-reported outcomes of ejaculatory-sparing transurethral prostatectomy in management of BPH. METHODS: Cochrane Library, Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science databases were searched systematically until July 6, 2024. Randomized controlled trials reporting data on ejaculatory-sparing techniques during transurethral prostatectomy were included. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials was used for quality assessment. The meta-analysis was conducted with Review Manager software. Numerical data were analyzed by standardized mean difference (SMD), while the risk ratio was used for analysis of categorical data. Fixed or random effects models were used according to heterogeneity. RESULTS: Five randomized controlled trials were included with 274 patients. No statistically significant differences were found between groups for International Prostate Symptom Score (SMD, 0.07; 95% CI, -0.45 to 0.59; P = .79), Qmax (SMD, -0.53; 95% CI, -1.11 to 0.06; P = .08), and International Index of Erectile Function (SMD, 0.89; 95% CI, -0.07 to 1.84; P = .07). Ejaculation was better preserved in ejaculatory-sparing techniques (risk ratio, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.12-0.30; P < .00001). CONCLUSIONS: Ejaculatory-sparing transurethral prostatectomy techniques are feasible to preserve ejaculation while improving outcomes without compromising functional voiding outcomes.

[Incidence of comorbid ED with LUTS and its risk factors in patients with BPH].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the incidence of comorbid ED with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and its risk factors in BPH patients. METHODS: Based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, we selected BPH patients visiting the outpatient department of the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from January 2020 to January 2023. We collected the general and clinical data from the patients, including age, height, body weight, abdominal circumference, hip circumference, blood pressure, blood routine, liver function, kidney function, blood lipids and fasting blood glucose, obtained their IPSS, quality of life (QOL) scores, and IIEF-5 scores by questionnaire investigation, and performed data processing and analysis with the SPSS 22.0 software. RESULTS: The incidence rate of comorbid ED with LUTS in the BPH patients rose with the increase of age, 36.46% in the 45－49-year group, 43.72% in the 50－54-year group, 53.66% in the 55－59-year group, 69.23% in the 60－64-year group, and 78.74% in the 65－70-year group. The lipid accumulation product (LAP), visceral adiposity index (VAI), triglycerides and glucose (TyG), hepatic steatosis index (HSI), body mass index (BMI), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), waist-to-height ratio (WHtR), triglycerides (TG) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) were correlated positively with IPSS scores and negatively with IIEF-5 scores, while LDL-C and total cholesterol (TC) negatively with IPSS scores and positively with IIEF-5 scores. CONCLUSION: The incidence of comorbid ED with LUTS in BPH patients increases with age. The risk factors for this comorbidity include hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, BMI, and lifestyle, and the risk of the condition can be effectively assessed by LAP, VAI, TYG, HSI, BMI, WHtR, WHR, TG and HDL-C.

Preoperative factors predicting poor therapeutic efficacy of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia.

OBJECTIVES: We assessed preoperative factors predicting the poor therapeutic efficacy of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) in benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) patients. METHODS: The present study included 159 patients who underwent HoLEP between August 2015 and June 2021 at our institution. Overall therapeutic efficacy was divided into good and poor therapeutic efficacies according to changes in the international prostate symptom score (IPSS), IPSS quality of life (IPSS-QOL), and the maximum urinary flow rate. Patients were divided into good and poor therapeutic efficacy groups based on findings obtained 3 months after HoLEP, and comparative assessments were performed between the two groups. RESULTS: The therapeutic efficacy of HoLEP was poor in 53 (33.3%) out of 159 patients. Intravesical prostatic protrusion (IPP), IPSS, IPSS-QOL, post-void residual volume (PVR), and the presence of overactive bladder (OAB) were significantly higher in the poor therapeutic efficacy group than in the good therapeutic efficacy group. A multivariable analysis of several factors identified the preoperative presence of OAB and short IPP as independent risk factors for the poor therapeutic efficacy of HoLEP. When treatment efficacy was divided according to risk factors, poor therapeutic efficacy was observed in only 14% of patients with prolonged IPP and the absence of OAB. CONCLUSIONS: The therapeutic efficacy of HoLEP may be poor in patients with OAB and short IPP, resulting in the significant deterioration of lower urinary tract symptoms. Accordingly, it is important to consider the presence or absence of OAB and IPP measurements when selecting indications for HoLEP.