Implementation of a novel otolaryngology clinic for indigent patients.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: This study was designed to describe the implementation, utilization, and outcomes of an otolaryngology clinic for indigent patients employing a novel design. STUDY DESIGN: Pilot study. METHODS: A tertiary-care academic otolaryngology department partnered with a nonprofit outpatient clinic for indigent patients in order to provide free subspecialty consultation services. A novel format was utilized in which the department provided on-site, scheduled outpatient multidisciplinary consultation on weekends, staffed by volunteer health care providers and ancillary staff. A review of the program was conducted using prospectively collected data. Clinic design, staffing, utilization, and feasibility were described, along with demographic and clinical data for all patients participating in the clinic from October 2010 through January 2012. RESULTS: Five clinics were held over 15 months, totaling 74 patient visits, with positive feedback regarding accessibility and quality of services provided. A total of 60 procedures were performed, including audiograms, endoscopies, otologic procedures, biopsies and/or excisions. The estimated value of medical services that were provided was $37,302. Four potentially life-threatening conditions were newly diagnosed. Twenty patients received conclusive evaluation and treatment at the time of their first visit. Eighteen patients required further subspecialty treatment and/or surgery that could not be provided in the outpatient setting, and were referred appropriately. CONCLUSIONS: The partnership between an academic otolaryngology department and a nonprofit clinic provided free on-site consultation for indigent patients. Such an arrangement is feasible, well utilized, and successful in delivering comprehensive specialized services to indigent patients who lack traditional access to medical care.

Complex home care: Part 2- family annual income, insurance premium, and out-of-pocket expenses.

Annual costs paid by families for intravenous infusion of home parenteral nutrition (HPN) health insurance premiums, deductibles, co-payments for health services, and the wide range of out-of-pocket home health care expenses are significant. The costs of managing complex chronic care at home cannot be completely understood until all out-of-pocket costs have been defined, described, and tabulated. Non-reimbursed and out-of-pocket costs paid by families over years for complex chronic care negatively impact the financial stability of families. National health care reform must take into account the long-term financial burdens of families caring for those with complex home care. Any changes that may increase the out-of-pocket costs or health insurance costs to these families can also have a negative long-term impact on society when greater numbers of patients declare bankruptcy or qualify for medical disability.

[Income reduction due to sickness benefits--when does sickness make you poor?]. / Einkommensverluste durch den Empfang von Krankengeld -- Wann macht Krankheit arm?

PURPOSE: When absent from work due to sickness, most employees in Germany receive continued pay from their employer for six weeks. After this period, sick employees receive sickness benefits from their Statutory Sickness Fund. These sickness benefits are calculated in a rather complicated way as a percentage of gross and net salary. The paper focuses on two questions that have rarely been studied: which income groups show a particularly large difference between net salary and net sickness benefits? Which income groups move below the poverty line after receiving sickness benefits? METHODS: We calculated how much sickness benefit is actually paid to the insured, for different income and tax groups. The definition for the poverty line is outlined as well. Due to methodological difficulties, the comparison between sickness benefits and poverty must be confined to single-person households. RESULTS: In the income groups chosen here (gross salary up to 4000 Euro per month), net sickness benefits amount to about 77 % of net salary, for all insured. Financial problems can mainly be expected for the lower and the upper income groups. Expressed in absolute terms, the upper income groups experience a large reduction in net income. The lower income groups come close to the poverty line or fall below it. CONCLUSIONS: Sickness benefits provide income in case of sickness; this is an important achievement of social policy. However, we should study the financial burden which sickness benefits could have for the insured. More in-depth analyses would require data that are not yet available (e. g. on the number of insured per income group and the income of other household members). The analyses presented here already show that sickness benefits could lead to severe financial problems for at least some insured. They point to the need for more studies in this neglected field.

Is lower income associated with greater biopsychosocial morbidity? Implications for physicians working with underserved patients.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have established a powerful relationship between socioeconomic position and health. However, there has been little attention given to the association between income, biopsychosocial morbidity, and decline in health over time among primary care patients. METHODS: Data were collected using a survey mailed to patients receiving care at a family medicine center and through a follow-up survey mailed 2 years later. The independent association between various biopsychosocial measures and family income was assessed through stepwise linear regression. After controlling for baseline health status, the effect of family income on health status at follow-up was assessed. RESULTS: Data were available from 922 active family medicine patients who responded to the initial survey and from 655 who responded to the follow-up survey. In bivariate analyses, lower family income was significantly associated with poorer health status, greater psychological distress, more family dysfunction, less social support, more behavioral risk factors, higher rates of obesity and uncontrolled blood pressure, poorer physical and mental health status, and more medical diagnoses. In a multivariate analysis, age, sex, marital status, race, social network, family criticism, smoking, fat consumption, and health status were independently associated with family income. After controlling for covariates, including baseline health status, family income was a significant predictor of health status at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Family income is associated with biopsychosocial morbidity and health decline. Physicians who care for poorer patients will likely be confronted by challenging and complex biopsychosocial problems.

Financial status does not predict weight loss after bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: Lower socioeconomic status and poor funding are thought to be associated with suboptimal outcome after bariatric surgery. We undertook this study to determine if funding status is a predictor of outcome in patients undergoing bariatric surgery. METHODS: The medical records of 131 consecutive patients who underwent vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) for clinically severe obesity (BMI >40 kg/m2) were reviewed. Patients were divided into three groups based on insurance status: (1) commercially insured/traditional indemnity programs; (2) entitlement programs (Medicare), and (3) medically indigent (Medicaid or no funding). Data is mean +/- SD. Data was analyzed using ANOVA and Student t-test. RESULTS: The three groups had similar preoperative weight. Mean BMI was 39 +/- 13, 42 +/- 15, 41 +/- 11 at 1 year, and 40 +/- 13, 43 +/- 16, 45 +/- 16 at 2 years postoperatively for the insured, entitlement, and indigent groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: After standard preoperative evaluation and screening, patients loss weight following VBG independent of insurance status. Source of funding should, therefore, not preclude patients from undergoing bariatric surgery. Patients with limited financial resources can expect similar outcomes as patients with commercial insurance.

[Health insurance in Africa: a straw for the health care system]. / Krankenversicherungen in Afrika: ein Strohhalm für das Gesundheitswesen.

Health Care Systems Clutch at a Straw: The health care systems of sub-Saharan Africa are facing a global crisis which is severely challenging their survival. Currently, alternatives to the traditional financing of health care by government grants and/or "fee for service" are sought. Otherwise the vast majority of poor rural inhabitants of these countries will lose access to Western medicine at the end of this century, making appropriate medical care a privilege of a small number of rich urbans. One approach to solving this crisis is the introduction of a health insurance system. However, the culture of African people must also be considered if one attempts to design and implement an insurance scheme. This paper reflects some of the problems of health insurance in an African context. Since the author contributed to the design of a "Community Based Health Insurance" of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Tansania, this scheme is used here as an example.

Early diagnosis and treatment of malaria in a refugee population in Sri Lanka.

To provide early diagnosis and prompt treatment for malaria, two interventions were compared in refugee camps in Kalpitiya, Sri Lanka. Community health volunteers (HV's) were trained in diagnosis and management of malaria on clinical grounds, while a field laboratory was established in another group of camps providing treatment after laboratory confirmation of a malarial infection. Patients with fever sought treatment from HV's on average after 2.74 days and from the field laboratory after 3.20 days. Although acceptance of both interventions was high, the effective catchment areas, especially of the HV's were small. Large numbers of health volunteers would be needed to cover all families, making it difficult to sustain supervision and necessary logistic support. For every malaria patient treated by HV's, three others would receive anti-malarial drugs unnecessarily. The maintenance of a field laboratory with a microscopist of the Anti-Malaria Campaign is not an economically viable option. Training of HV's in microscopy with a mechanism for cost recovery should be given serious consideration. HV's and diagnosis and treatment centers should be able to handle a wide spectrum of common diseases. A better option for Sri Lanka in the short term might be to improve existing general health facilities that are accessible to the refugee population.

Prescribed medication and nutrition of social care patients in Crete, Greece.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to make a systematic registration of a group of 354 social care indigent patients in relation to: their pharmaceutical needs: the conditions for which it was prescribed, its cost, and details of prescriptions. In addition patients' eating patterns relating to and knowledge of how to use their medication was assessed. They were compared to a control group of 153 Social Security patients. SUBJECTS: The Social Care indigent patients were of low income, consisting of groups as unmarried mothers with their children and Greeks emigrants coming back home from other countries (Albania, Russia, Georgia, Ukraine, Romania etc.). The socio-demographic profiles of this group reveal an unemployment rate of 74% and an illiteracy rate of 18%. As regards marital status, 20% are bachelors and 12% divorcees. RESULTS: The results of the study indicated no significant difference between the two groups in the mean cost of prescription (40 ECU for Social Care patients vs 32 ECU for Social Security patients), in the mean number of medication per prescription (2.6 vs 2.6 respectively), in the percentages of the Daily Defined Doses and the cost of the various categories of drugs. For both groups, the most common drugs were those of the Cardiovascular system (30% vs 26%), Gastrointestinal system (17% vs 27%) and Nervous system (16% vs 18%). The most common diagnosis was Hypertension (10% vs 8%) and the most common drugs were Ranitidine (3% vs 2%), Diclofenac (3% vs 3%), Salbutamol (3% vs 3%) and Paracetamol (2% vs 2%). Significant differences between Social Care patients to Social Security patients respectively were found regarding: knowing how to take their medication correctly (47% vs 77%), knowing for how long treatment needed to be taken (21% vs 43%), requesting information from the pharmacist (39% vs 68%) knowledge of dietary instructions regarding medication (17% vs 41%) and in smoking more than 20 cigarettes per day (15% vs 3%). CONCLUSIONS: The results indicated that the Social Care patients, in comparison with the patients of the Social Security, need more education and more help in the area of the proper use of drugs and in the personal contact that this procedure involves.

The response of injection drug users to free treatment on demand: implications for HIV control.

Injection drug use is a major risk factor for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and drug treatment is widely recognized as a core component of the public health effort to limit the spread of HIV. The assumption is frequently made that lack of immediate access to treatment is a significant barrier to the success of this effort. However, little empirical data exist to support this belief. We conducted a trial of no-cost outpatient drug-free treatment made available on demand to a cohort of out-of-treatment injection drug users (IDUs) in Portland, Oregon, through a coupon program. Of 824 IDUs, 272 (33%) expressed an interest in treatment, 225 (27%) accepted a coupon, 66 (8%) redeemed a coupon, and 9 (1%) remained in treatment for 6 months. These numbers indicate that simply enhancing access is not adequate. Additional strategies to increase motivation to enter and remain in treatment are needed if drug treatment is to play an important role in reducing the spread of HIV among injection drug users, their sexual partners, and their infants.

Income class and pharmaceutical expenditure in Canada: 1964-1990.

In the 1970s, nearly all Canadian provinces introduced drug programs to subsidize purchases by low-income families. This study was undertaken to determine whether these programs were successful in reducing out-of-pocket pharmaceutical expenditures for low-income families and individuals, and to compare expenditures in this group with those of high-income families. Expenditures were calculated for a low- and a high-income group from Statistics Canada surveys conducted between 1964 and 1990. In the low-income group there was a 40% decline in drug expenditure measured as a percentage of total family expenditure and this was coincident with the introduction of provincial drug programs. However, the high-income group had an even larger decrease in drug expenditure. Per capita spending as a percentage of total family expenditure in the low-income group, was seven times that of the high-income group and there was no change in this ratio after the introduction of the drug plans.