Complement activation profiles in anti-acetylcholine receptor positive myasthenia gravis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Complement component 5 (C5) targeting therapies are clinically beneficial in patients with acetylcholine receptor antibody+ (AChR-Ab+ ) generalized myasthenia gravis (MG). That clearly implicates antibody-mediated complement activation in MG pathogenesis. Here, classical and alternative complement pathways were profiled in patients from different MG subgroups. METHODS: In a case-control study, concentrations of C3a, C5a and sC5b9 were simultaneously quantified, indicating general activation of the complement system, whether via the classical and lectin pathways (C4a) or the alternative pathway (factors Ba and Bb) in MG patients with AChR or muscle-specific kinase antibodies (MuSK-Abs) or seronegative MG compared to healthy donors. RESULTS: Treatment-naïve patients with AChR-Ab+ MG showed substantially increased plasma levels of cleaved complement components, indicating activation of the classical and alternative as well as the terminal complement pathways. These increases were still present in a validation cohort of AChR-Ab+ patients under standard immunosuppressive therapies; notably, they were not evident in patients with MuSK-Abs or seronegative MG. Neither clinical severity parameters (at the time of sampling or 1 year later) nor anti-AChR titres correlated significantly with activated complement levels. CONCLUSIONS: Markers indicative of complement activation are prominently increased in patients with AChR-Ab MG despite standard immunosuppressive therapies. Complement inhibition proximal to C5 cleavage should be explored for its potential therapeutic benefits in AChR-Ab+ MG.

The Duke myasthenia gravis clinic registry: I. Description and demographics.

INTRODUCTION: The Duke Myasthenia Gravis (MG) Clinic Registry is a disease-specific database containing physician-derived data from patients seen in the Duke MG Clinic since 1980. METHODS: Data from 1060 MG patients initially seen between 1980 and 2008 were reviewed. RESULTS: Fifty-four percent were male. Symptoms began after age 50 in 66% of males and 42% of females. Peak onset age in males was in their 60's; females had no predominant onset age. Onset age for both sexes increased from 1980 to 2008. Thymoma was present in 8.5%. Weakness was limited to ocular muscles for at least 2 y in 22% and became generalized later in 8.3% of these. Acetylcholine receptor antibodies were present in 78% overall, 82% with generalized MG and 52% with ocular MG (OMG). The distribution of MG disease class was similar in males and females, except that a greater proportion of women experienced myasthenic crisis and men were more likely to have OMG. DISCUSSION: Data in the Registry permit comprehensive and longitudinal analysis of a validated MG population. Analysis of Registry data shows that the frequency of AChR antibody negative MG, ocular MG, and thymoma are similar to other reports, but the onset age and proportion of males have progressively increased compared to studies published more than 20 y ago. These observations demonstrate the value of collecting comprehensive clinical information and comparing historic and contemporary populations. Other potential uses of Registry data include comparison of outcome measures in different disease subgroups and the response to specific treatments.

Patient-acceptable symptom states in myasthenia gravis.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) cut points for myasthenia gravis (MG) health scales. METHODS: We conducted an electronic survey that included the Myasthenia Gravis Impairment Index (MGII), EuroQol 5-Dimension (EQ5D), and a simple PASS question. PASS-anchored thresholds were estimated for the MGII questionnaire through receiver operating characteristic curves. We used the MGII PASS cut point in a validation cohort of 257 patients to estimate PASS thresholds for other clinically relevant health scales such as the Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis Scale (QMGS), Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL), Myasthenia Gravis Composite (MGC), and Myasthenia Quality of Life (MG-QoL15). RESULTS: One hundred twenty-four of ≈250 invited patients answered the electronic survey (49% response rate), and 80 considered their current symptom state acceptable (PASS-positive). They had lower MGII scores than PASS-negative patients (7.76 ± 9.37 vs 25.0 ± 13.7, p < 0.0001) and better EQ5D scores (0.86 ± 0.17 vs 0.69 ± 0.18, p < 0.0001). The MGII questionnaire threshold for PASS was ≤10 points. With the use of this threshold in an independent dataset of 257 patients, all patients in remission or minimal manifestation status were PASS-positive. In addition, some patients in Classes I, II, and IIIA also achieved PASS status. PASS thresholds for the QMGS, MG-ADL, MGC, and MG-QoL15 were ≤7, 2, 3, and 8 points, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We have estimated thresholds for commonly used myasthenia health scales reflecting patient-acceptable states in patients with MG. These thresholds indicate a global state of well being, rather than a change in scores, or being better. Therefore, PASS thresholds can be used as secondary endpoints for myasthenia research.

Subgroup stratification and outcome in recently diagnosed generalized myasthenia gravis.

OBJECTIVE: To describe disease outcomes of myasthenia gravis (MG) subgroups and which factors influence outcomes by reviewing individual patient records of a representative cohort. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 199 patients with generalized MG and disease onset after the year 2000 who were treated at 2 tertiary referral centers in Austria. We stratified patients as early- and late-onset acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive, muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK) antibody-positive, and seronegative patients and patients with thymoma regardless of antibody status. We evaluated patients' symptom severity and treatment regimens and the occurrence of life-threatening events at yearly time points for up to 10 years. RESULTS: Minimal manifestation status or better was eventually achieved and sustained for >1 year by 125 (63%) patients. Forty percent (66 of 165 patients) showed an early response to treatment, which predicted a benign disease course later on. In contrast, 19% of patients, who remained symptomatic for 2 years after disease onset despite immunosuppressive therapy, were more treatment resistant in the following years. The strongest predictor of outcome was the diagnostic subgroup. Patients with MuSK-MG had a much better outcome than previously reported. CONCLUSION: Our data give an update on the disease course of generalized MG in the new century. Diagnostic subgroups and response to treatment within the first 2 years help to predict the long term outcome.

Comparison Between Rituximab Treatment for New-Onset Generalized Myasthenia Gravis and Refractory Generalized Myasthenia Gravis.

Importance: Use of biologic agents in generalized myasthenia gravis is generally limited to therapy-refractory cases; benefit in new-onset disease is unknown. Objective: To assess rituximab in refractory and new-onset generalized myasthenia gravis and rituximab vs conventional immunotherapy in new-onset disease. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective cohort study with prospectively collected data was conducted on a county-based community sample at Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. Participants included 72 patients with myasthenia gravis, excluding those displaying muscle-specific tyrosine kinase antibodies, initiating rituximab treatment from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2018, and patients with new-onset disease initiating conventional immunotherapy from January 1, 2003, to December 31, 2012, with 12 months or more of observation time. The present study was conducted from March 1, 2019, to January 31, 2020. Exposures: Treatment with low-dose rituximab (most often 500 mg every 6 months) or conventional immunosuppressants. Main Outcomes and Measures: Time to remission (main outcome) as well as use of rescue therapies or additional immunotherapies and time in remission (secondary outcomes). Results: Of the 72 patients included, 31 patients (43%) were women; mean (SD) age at treatment start was 60 (18) years. Twenty-four patients had received rituximab within 12 months of disease onset and 48 received rituximab at a later time, 34 of whom had therapy-refractory disease. A total of 26 patients (3 [12%] women; mean [SD] age, 68 [11] years at treatment start) received conventional immunosuppressant therapy. Median time to remission was shorter for new-onset vs refractory disease (7 vs 16 months: hazard ratio [HR], 2.53; 95% CI, 1.26-5.07; P = .009 after adjustment for age, sex, and disease severity) and for rituximab vs conventional immunosuppressant therapies (7 vs 11 months: HR, 2.97; 95% CI, 1.43-6.18; P = .004 after adjustment). In addition, fewer rescue therapy episodes during the first 24 months were required (mean [SD], 0.38 [1.10] vs 1.31 [1.59] times; mean difference, -1.26; 95% CI, -1.97 to -0.56; P < .001 after adjustment), and a larger proportion of patients had minimal or no need of additional immunotherapies (70% vs 35%; OR, 5.47; 95% CI, 1.40-21.43; P = .02 after adjustment). Rates of treatment discontinuation due to adverse events were lower with rituximab compared with conventional therapies (3% vs 46%; P < .001 after adjustment). Conclusions and Relevance: Clinical outcomes with rituximab appeared to be more favorable in new-onset generalized myasthenia gravis, and rituximab also appeared to perform better than conventional immunosuppressant therapy. These findings suggest a relatively greater benefit of rituximab earlier in the disease course. A placebo-controlled randomized trial to corroborate these findings is warranted.

Circulating miRNAs as Potential Biomarkers in Myasthenia Gravis: Tools for Personalized Medicine.

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease caused by antibodies which attack receptors at the neuromuscular junction. One of the main difficulties in predicting the clinical course of MG is the heterogeneity of the disease, where disease progression differs greatly depending on the subgroup that the patient is classified into. MG subgroups are classified according to: age of onset [early-onset MG (EOMG; onset ≤ 50 years) versus late-onset MG (LOMG; onset > 50 years]; the presence of a thymoma (thymoma-associated MG); antibody subtype [acetylcholine receptor antibody seropositive (AChR+) and muscle-specific tyrosine kinase antibody seropositive (MuSK+)]; as well as clinical subtypes (ocular versus generalized MG). The diagnostic tests for MG, such as antibody titers, neurophysiological tests, and objective clinical fatigue score, do not necessarily reflect disease progression. Hence, there is a great need for reliable objective biomarkers in MG to follow the disease course as well as the individualized response to therapy toward personalized medicine. In this regard, circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) have emerged as promising potential biomarkers due to their accessibility in body fluids and unique profiles in different diseases, including autoimmune disorders. Several studies on circulating miRNAs in MG subtypes have revealed specific miRNA profiles in patients' sera. In generalized AChR+ EOMG, miR-150-5p and miR-21-5p are the most elevated miRNAs, with lower levels observed upon treatment with immunosuppression and thymectomy. In AChR+ generalized LOMG, the miR-150-5p, miR-21-5p, and miR-30e-5p levels are elevated and decrease in accordance with the clinical response after immunosuppression. In ocular MG, higher levels of miR-30e-5p discriminate patients who will later generalize from those remaining ocular. In contrast, in MuSK+ MG, the levels of the let-7 miRNA family members are elevated. Studies of circulating miRNA profiles in Lrp4 or agrin antibody-seropositive MG are still lacking. This review summarizes the present knowledge of circulating miRNAs in different subgroups of MG.

Miastenia Gravis: reporte de dos casos y revisión de la literatura / Myasthenia Gravis: two case reports and review

Myasthenia gravis is an acquired autoimmune disorder of the neuromuscular junction characterized by fluctuating weakness and fatigability of skeletal muscles. The diagnosis can be established by clinical and serologic testing, with predominance of autoantibodies against the acetylcholine receptor, and Muscle-specific kinase antibodies. We report two cases of Myasthenia gravis, the first one is a 31 year old patient with a debut of the disease, mainly with bulbar symptoms, and the second one is a 29 year old patient diagnosed with generalized Miasthenia Gravis also mainly with bulbar symptoms with worsening of symptomatology. In this report treatments alternatives and management approaches are discused

Generalized Myasthenia Gravis: Classification, Clinical Presentation, Natural History, and Epidemiology.

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a rare disease, but the most common disorder of the neuromuscular junction. It is the prototypic autoimmune disease most commonly caused by antibodies to the acetylcholine receptor (AChR) leading to characteristic fatigable weakness of the ocular, bulbar, respiratory, axial, and limb muscles. The majority of patients with MG first present with ocular symptoms. Most patients with MG will experience at least 1 exacerbation of symptoms throughout the course of their illness. This article will cover the epidemiology, clinical presentation, classification, and natural history of MG.

Serological and experimental studies in different forms of myasthenia gravis.

Antibodies to the acetylcholine receptor (AChR) have been recognized for over 40 years and have been important in the diagnosis of myasthenia gravis (MG), and its recognition in patients of different ages and thymic pathologies. The 10-20% of patients who do not have AChR antibodies are now known to comprise different subgroups, the most commonly reported of which is patients with antibodies to muscle-specific kinase (MuSK). The use of cell-based assays has extended the repertoire of antibody tests to clustered AChRs, low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4, and agrin. Autoantibodies against intracellular targets, namely cortactin, titin, and ryanodine receptor (the latter two being associated with the presence of thymoma), may also be helpful as biomarkers in some patients. IgG4 MuSK antibodies are clearly pathogenic, but the coexisting IgG1, IgG2, and IgG3 antibodies, collectively, have effects that question the dominance of IgG4 as the sole pathologic factor in MuSK MG. After a brief historical review, we define the different subgroups and summarize the antibody characteristics. Experiments to demonstrate the in vitro and in vivo pathogenic roles of MuSK antibodies are discussed.

A unique subphenotype of myasthenia gravis.

While extraocular muscles (EOMs) are affected early in generalized myasthenia gravis (MG), and their treatment responsiveness is similar to nonocular muscles, we have identified an ophthalmoplegic (OP) subphenotype that remains resistant to treatment. This subphenotype of ophthalmoplegic MG (OP-MG) most commonly affects acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive cases with juvenile-onset MG and African genetic ancestry. However, a few OP-MG cases have been found with MuSK antibodies and triple-seronegative MG. In a proportion of OP-MG cases, the EOM treatment resistance manifests from treatment initiation, while in others the EOMs may initially respond until a critical trigger, such as treatment interruption or crisis. The management of OP-MG is an unmet need. Managing the visual disability may require a surgical or nonsurgical solution. The ideal case selection for surgery and the timing of surgery should be carefully considered. The pathogenesis of OP-MG remains unknown. A genetic study, using extended whole-exome sequencing and an "extreme" phenotype sample of OP-MG versus control MG cases differing only by their EOM responsivity to therapy, discovered several potentially functional OP-MG risk variants. These variants implicate myogenesis and gangliosphingolipid biosynthesis pathways at the EOM endplates in OP-MG.

[Myasthenia gravis should be considered in cases of Parkinson's disease and progressive dysphagia]. / Bei Morbus Parkinson und progredienter Dysphagie an Myasthenia gravis denken.

We report on four consecutive patients with Parkinson's disease, in whom anti-acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibody positive bulbar myasthenia gravis (MG) turned out to be responsible for progressive dysphagia.

Pathophysiology and immunological profile of myasthenia gravis and its subgroups.

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune antibody-mediated disease characterized by muscle weakness and fatigability. It is believed that the initial steps triggering humoral immunity in MG take place inside thymic tissue and thymoma. The immune response against one or several epitopes expressed on thymic tissue cells spills over to neuromuscular junction components sharing the same epitope causing humoral autoimmunity and antibody production. The main cause of MG is acetylcholine receptor antibodies. However, many other neuromuscular junction membrane protein targets, intracellular and extracellular proteins are suggested to participate in MG pathophysiology. MG should be divided into subgroups based on clinical presentation and immunology. This includes onset age, clinical characteristics, thymic pathology and antibody profile. The immunological profile of these subgroups is determined by the antibodies present.

Randomized Trial of Thymectomy in Myasthenia Gravis.

BACKGROUND: Thymectomy has been a mainstay in the treatment of myasthenia gravis, but there is no conclusive evidence of its benefit. We conducted a multicenter, randomized trial comparing thymectomy plus prednisone with prednisone alone. METHODS: We compared extended transsternal thymectomy plus alternate-day prednisone with alternate-day prednisone alone. Patients 18 to 65 years of age who had generalized nonthymomatous myasthenia gravis with a disease duration of less than 5 years were included if they had Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America clinical class II to IV disease (on a scale from I to V, with higher classes indicating more severe disease) and elevated circulating concentrations of acetylcholine-receptor antibody. The primary outcomes were the time-weighted average Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis score (on a scale from 0 to 39, with higher scores indicating more severe disease) over a 3-year period, as assessed by means of blinded rating, and the time-weighted average required dose of prednisone over a 3-year period. RESULTS: A total of 126 patients underwent randomization between 2006 and 2012 at 36 sites. Patients who underwent thymectomy had a lower time-weighted average Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis score over a 3-year period than those who received prednisone alone (6.15 vs. 8.99, P<0.001); patients in the thymectomy group also had a lower average requirement for alternate-day prednisone (44 mg vs. 60 mg, P<0.001). Fewer patients in the thymectomy group than in the prednisone-only group required immunosuppression with azathioprine (17% vs. 48%, P<0.001) or were hospitalized for exacerbations (9% vs. 37%, P<0.001). The number of patients with treatment-associated complications did not differ significantly between groups (P=0.73), but patients in the thymectomy group had fewer treatment-associated symptoms related to immunosuppressive medications (P<0.001) and lower distress levels related to symptoms (P=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Thymectomy improved clinical outcomes over a 3-year period in patients with nonthymomatous myasthenia gravis. (Funded by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and others; MGTX ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00294658.).

Development and validation of the Myasthenia Gravis Impairment Index.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to develop a measure of myasthenia gravis impairment using a previously developed framework and to evaluate reliability and validity, specifically face, content, and construct validity. METHODS: The first draft of the Myasthenia Gravis Impairment Index (MGII) included examination items from available measures enriched with newly developed, patient-reported items, modified after patient input. International neuromuscular specialists evaluated face and content validity via an e-mail survey. Test-retest reliability was assessed in stable patients at a 3-week interval and interrater reliability was evaluated in the same day. Construct validity was assessed through correlations between the MGII and other measures and by comparing scores in different patient groups. RESULTS: The first draft was assessed by 18 patients, and 72 specialists answered the survey. The second draft had 7 examination and 22 patient-reported items. Field testing included 200 patients, with 54 patients completing the reliability studies. Test-retest reliability of the total score was good (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.92; 95% confidence interval 0.79-0.94), as was interrater reliability of the examination component (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.81; 95% confidence interval 0.79-0.94). The MGII correlated well with comparison measures, with higher correlations with the MG-activities of daily living (r = 0.91) and MG-specific quality of life 15-item scale (r = 0.78). When assessing different patient groups, the scores followed expected patterns. CONCLUSIONS: The MGII was developed using a patient-centered framework of myasthenia-related impairments and incorporating patient input throughout the development process. It is reliable in an outpatient setting and has demonstrated construct validity. Responsiveness studies are under way.

Myasthenia gravis - autoantibody characteristics and their implications for therapy.

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disorder caused by autoantibodies that target the neuromuscular junction, leading to muscle weakness and fatigability. Currently available treatments for the disease include symptomatic pharmacological treatment, immunomodulatory drugs, plasma exchange, thymectomy and supportive therapies. Different autoantibody patterns and clinical manifestations characterize different subgroups of the disease: early-onset MG, late-onset MG, thymoma MG, muscle-specific kinase MG, low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4 MG, seronegative MG, and ocular MG. These subtypes differ in terms of clinical characteristics, disease pathogenesis, prognosis and response to therapies. Patients would, therefore, benefit from treatment that is tailored to their disease subgroup, as well as other possible disease biomarkers, such as antibodies against cytoplasmic muscle proteins. Here, we discuss the different MG subtypes, the sensitivity and specificity of the various antibodies involved in MG for distinguishing between these subtypes, and the value of antibody assays in guiding optimal therapy. An understanding of these elements should be useful in determining how to adapt existing therapies to the requirements of each patient.

Association of HLA class II (DRB1, DQA1, DQB1) alleles and haplotypes with myasthenia gravis and its subgroups in the Iranian population.

Heterogenic pattern of HLA associations with myasthenia gravis (MG) among different ethnicities and also among different MG subgroups has been the subject of debate in large series of many studies. One hundred and sixty Iranian MG patients were investigated for HLA class II (DRB1, DQA1, DQB1) associations compared to two hundred healthy controls from the same ethnic population. DRB1*11 DQA1*0501 DQB1*0301 haplotype was found to be protective for total (ocular plus generalized) MG (Pc=0.005, OR=0.49) and generalized MG (Pc=0.008, OR=0.49). DRB1*04 DQA1*0301 DQB1*0302 haplotype (Pc=0.03, OR=2.25) was predisposing for anti-acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibody-positive MG, while DRB1*16 DQA1*0102 DQB1*05 (Pc=0.013, OR=4.28) was predisposing for anti-muscle specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK) antibody-positive MG. There was also a trend of positive association for DRB1*14 DQA1*0104 DQB1*05 haplotype with MuSK-positive MG (Pc=0.054, OR=3.97). Among other MG subgroups and with less significance, DRB1*0101 DQA1*0101 DQB1*05 haplotype (P=0.016, OR=3.68) had positive association with pure ocular MG, and DRB1*03 DQA1*0501 DQB1*0201 haplotype (P=0.024) had negative association with thymomatous MG. This study highlights the importance of appropriate MG subgrouping according to clinical and paraclinical characteristics in HLA studies among MG patients.

Myasthenia Gravis.

Myasthenia gravis is an autoimmune neuromuscular disease caused by antibodies directed against the postsynaptic muscle membrane. The clinical hallmark of the disease is fluctuating and fatigable weakness that affects the ocular muscles (resulting in diplopia and ptosis), the bulbar muscles (causing dysphagia, dysarthria, and dyspnea), and extremity muscles. The diagnosis is most often made with serological testing that identifies either acetylcholine receptor antibodies or muscle-specific tyrosine kinase antibodies. Electrodiagnostic testing has a role in supporting the diagnosis. There are many available treatments that result in improvement of function and quality of life. Treatment should be individualized after consideration of many factors, including disease distribution and severity, patient comorbidities, age, serological status, and what is known about the efficacy and safety of the various treatments.

Myasthenia gravis: subgroup classification and therapeutic strategies.

Myasthenia gravis is an autoimmune disease that is characterised by muscle weakness and fatigue, is B-cell mediated, and is associated with antibodies directed against the acetylcholine receptor, muscle-specific kinase (MUSK), lipoprotein-related protein 4 (LRP4), or agrin in the postsynaptic membrane at the neuromuscular junction. Patients with myasthenia gravis should be classified into subgroups to help with therapeutic decisions and prognosis. Subgroups based on serum antibodies and clinical features include early-onset, late-onset, thymoma, MUSK, LRP4, antibody-negative, and ocular forms of myasthenia gravis. Agrin-associated myasthenia gravis might emerge as a new entity. The prognosis is good with optimum symptomatic, immunosuppressive, and supportive treatment. Pyridostigmine is the preferred symptomatic treatment, and for patients who do not adequately respond to symptomatic therapy, corticosteroids, azathioprine, and thymectomy are first-line immunosuppressive treatments. Additional immunomodulatory drugs are emerging, but therapeutic decisions are hampered by the scarcity of controlled studies. Long-term drug treatment is essential for most patients and must be tailored to the particular form of myasthenia gravis.