Evaluation of a blood miRNA/mRNA signature to follow-up Lu-PRRT therapy for G1/G2 intestinal neuroendocrine tumors.

Background: 177Lu-oxodotreotide peptide receptor therapy (LuPRRT) is an efficient treatment for midgut neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of variable radiological response. Several clinical, biological, and imaging parameters may be used to establish a relative disease prognosis but none is able to predict early efficacy or toxicities. We investigated expression levels for mRNA and miRNA involved in radiosensitivity and tumor progression searching for correlations related to patient outcome during LuPRRT therapy. Methods: Thirty-five patients received LuPRRT for G1/G2 midgut NETs between May 2019 and September 2021. Peripheral blood samples were collected prior to irradiation, before and 48 h after the second and the fourth LuPRRT, and at 6-month follow-up. Multiple regression analyses and Pearson correlations were performed to identify the miRNA/mRNA signature that will best predict response to LuPRRT. Results: Focusing on four mRNAs and three miRNAs, we identified a miRNA/mRNA signature enabling the early identification of responders to LuPRRT with significant reduced miRNA/mRNA expression after the first LuPRRT administration for patients with progressive disease at 1 year (p < 0.001). The relevance of this signature was reinforced by studying its evolution up to 6 months post-LuPRRT. Moreover, nadir absolute lymphocyte count within the first 2 months after the first LuPRRT administration was significantly related to low miRNA/mRNA expression level (p < 0.05) for patients with progressive disease. Conclusion: We present a pilot study exploring a miRNA/mRNA signature that correlates with early hematologic toxicity and therapeutic response 12 months following LuPRRT. This signature will be tested prospectively in a larger series of patients.

[177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE plus long-acting octreotide versus high­dose long-acting octreotide for the treatment of newly diagnosed, advanced grade 2-3, well-differentiated, gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (NETTER-2): an open-label, randomised, phase 3 study.

BACKGROUND: There are currently no standard first-line treatment options for patients with higher grade 2-3, well-differentiated, advanced, gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of first-line [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE (177Lu-Dotatate) treatment. METHODS: NETTER-2 was an open-label, randomised, parallel-group, superiority, phase 3 trial. We enrolled patients (aged ≥15 years) with newly diagnosed higher grade 2 (Ki67 ≥10% and ≤20%) and grade 3 (Ki67 >20% and ≤55%), somatostatin receptor-positive (in all target lesions), advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours from 45 centres across nine countries in North America, Europe, and Asia. We used interactive response technologies to randomly assign (2:1) patients to receive four cycles (cycle interval was 8 weeks ± 1 week) of intravenous 177Lu-Dotatate plus intramuscular octreotide 30 mg long-acting repeatable (LAR) then octreotide 30 mg LAR every 4 weeks (177Lu-Dotatate group) or high-dose octreotide 60 mg LAR every 4 weeks (control group), stratified by neuroendocrine tumour grade (2 vs 3) and origin (pancreas vs other). Tumour assessments were done at baseline, week 16, and week 24, and then every 12 weeks until disease progression or death. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival by blinded, independent, central radiology assessment. We did the primary analysis at 101 progression-free survival events as the final progression-free survival analysis. NETTER-2 is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03972488, and is active and not recruiting. FINDINGS: Between Jan 22, 2020, and Oct 13, 2022, we screened 261 patients, 35 (13%) of whom were excluded. We randomly assigned 226 (87%) patients (121 [54%] male and 105 [46%] female) to the 177Lu-Dotatate group (n=151 [67%]) and control group (n=75 [33%]). Median progression-free survival was 8·5 months (95% CI 7·7-13·8) in the control group and 22·8 months (19·4-not estimated) in the 177Lu-Dotatate group (stratified hazard ratio 0·276 [0·182-0·418]; p<0·0001). During the treatment period, adverse events (of any grade) occurred in 136 (93%) of 147 treated patients in the 177Lu-Dotatate group and 69 (95%) of 73 treated patients in the control group. There were no study drug-related deaths during the treatment period. INTERPRETATION: First-line 177Lu-Dotatate plus octreotide LAR significantly extended median progression-free survival (by 14 months) in patients with grade 2 or 3 advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. 177Lu-Dotatate should be considered a new standard of care in first-line therapy in this population. FUNDING: Advanced Accelerator Applications, a Novartis Company.

Gut tumors in flies alter the taste valence of an anti-tumorigenic bitter compound.

The sense of taste is essential for survival, as it allows animals to distinguish between foods that are nutritious from those that are toxic. However, innate responses to different tastants can be modulated or even reversed under pathological conditions. Here, we examined whether and how the internal status of an animal impacts taste valence by using Drosophila models of hyperproliferation in the gut. In all three models where we expressed proliferation-inducing transgenes in intestinal stem cells (ISCs), hyperproliferation of ISCs caused a tumor-like phenotype in the gut. While tumor-bearing flies had no deficiency in overall food intake, strikingly, they exhibited an increased gustatory preference for aristolochic acid (ARI), which is a bitter and normally aversive plant-derived chemical. ARI had anti-tumor effects in all three of our gut hyperproliferation models. For other aversive chemicals we tested that are bitter but do not have anti-tumor effects, gut tumors did not affect avoidance behaviors. We demonstrated that bitter-sensing gustatory receptor neurons (GRNs) in tumor-bearing flies respond normally to ARI. Therefore, the internal pathology of gut hyperproliferation affects neural circuits that determine taste valence postsynaptic to GRNs rather than altering taste identity by GRNs. Overall, our data suggest that increased consumption of ARI may represent an attempt at self-medication. Finally, although ARI's potential use as a chemotherapeutic agent is limited by its known toxicity in the liver and kidney, our findings suggest that tumor-bearing flies might be a useful animal model to screen for novel anti-tumor drugs.

Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant therapy in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness and safety of neoadjuvant therapy in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) and provide evidence-based suggestions for clinical treatment. METHODS: The Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science were searched for articles published that analyzed the effectiveness and safety of GEP-NEN-targeted neoadjuvant therapy before March 2023. A confidence interval (CI) of 95%, a subgroup analysis, heterogeneity, and effect size (ES) were analyzed, and a meta-analysis of the literature was performed using the Stata BE17 software. RESULTS: A total of 417 patients from 13 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The primary variables comprised the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), surgical resection rate, and R0 resection rate with ES values of 0.42 (95% CI: 0.25-0.60), 0.96 (95% CI: 0.93-0.99), 0.67 (95% CI: 0.50-0.84), and 0.60 (95% CI: 0.54-0.67), respectively. The secondary variables were the incidence rates of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), Grade 3 or higher TRAEs, and surgical complications with ES values of 0.29 (95% CI: -0.03-0.21), 0.13 (95% CI: -0.07-0.33), and 0.35 (95% CI: 0.27-0.44), respectively. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant therapy is an effective and safe treatment method for GEP-NENs. However, further studies are required to determine the optimal regimen for this therapy in these tumors.

Enhancing treatment strategies for small bowel cancer: a clinical review of targeted therapy and immunotherapy approaches.

Small bowel cancer (SBC) is a rare and aggressive disease with a poor prognosis, necessitating the exploration of novel treatment approaches. This narrative review examines the current evidence on targeted therapy and immunotherapy for SBC, focusing on the two most common subtypes: adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine tumor. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases was conducted to identify relevant clinical trials and case reports published in English up to September 2023. The review includes 17 clinical trials and 10 case reports, indicating that targeted therapy and immunotherapy can have the potential to improve survival rates in patients with SBC. Notably, promising targeted medicines include bevacizumab, cetuximab, and trastuzumab, while pembrolizumab and nivolumab show potential as immunotherapies. However, it should be noted that the magnitude of the increase in survival rates with these interventions was small. Further research is needed to determine the optimal combination of targeted therapy and immunotherapy for individual patients with SBC.

Efficacy and safety of streptozocin-based chemotherapy for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in Japanese clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Streptozocin has been used to treat neuroendocrine tumors in Europe and the USA; however, its actual status in Japan has not been fully clarified owing to the rarity of this disease and the relatively recent approval of streptozocin in Japan. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 53 patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors who were treated with streptozocin-based chemotherapy at two Japanese hospitals between January 2004 and June 2023. RESULTS: The overall response and disease control rates were 27.7 and 74.5%, respectively, and the median progression-free survival and overall survival were 7.1 and 20.3 months, respectively. Performance status ≥1 showed a significant negative correlation with progression-free survival, and performance status ≥1 and liver tumor burden ≥25% showed a significant negative correlation with overall survival. No significant differences were observed in the treatment response between pancreatic and gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors. No treatment-related serious adverse events were observed; however, 87.7% of patients expressed a decrease in the estimated glomerular filtration rate, which negatively correlated with the duration of streptozocin treatment (r = 0.43, P = 0.0020). In the streptozocin re-administration group (n = 5), no differences were found in efficacy between the initial and second streptozocin treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Although streptozocin is a safe, streptozocin-induced renal dysfunction is a dilemma in streptozocin responders. Streptozocin may benefit patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, especially those with a good performance status; however, in some cases, planned streptozocin withdrawal or switching to other drugs should be considered.

Outcome on Mesenteric Mass Response of Small-Intestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors Treated by 177Lu-DOTATATE Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy: The MesenLuth Study, a National Study from the French Group of Endocrine Tumors and Endocan-RENATEN Network.

A mesenteric mass (MM), characterized by fibrotic reaction, is present in most small-intestinal neuroendocrine tumors (SI-NETs). 177Lu-DOTATATE peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has shown its efficacy in patients with progressive SI-NETs. However, because of specific tissue characteristics of desmoplastic MMs, we hypothesize that these lesions may be refractory to 177Lu-DOTATATE PRRT. Methods: From the national French Groupe d'étude des Tumeurs Endocrines database, we identified patients with an advanced SI-NET and a MM (≥2 cm with a retractile aspect) of a SI-NET treated by at least 1 course of 177Lu-DOTATATE PRRT. The primary endpoint was a MM objective response rate (ORR) of less than 5%. Secondary endpoints were metabolic response, MM-related safety, and clinical response, as well as MM progression-free survival (PFS) and non-MM PFS. Results: In total, 52 patients were included. The MM ORR was 4% (n = 2), and the non-MM ORR was 8% (n = 4). No patient had a MM metabolic response, and the non-MM metabolic response rate was 12% (n = 6). Among the 26 patients with baseline MM-related symptoms, 46% had a clinical response. Four patients presented with gastrointestinal complications during PRRT. The median MM-related PFS was not reached, and the non-MM PFS was 50.3 mo (95% CI, 38.2-61.7 mo). Conclusion: This study confirms that 177Lu-DOTATATE PRRT does not lead to morphologic response on MMs (ORR < 5%). However, it allows MM stability, with few MM-related side effects, and has a relevant impact on MM-related symptoms.

Combined Lanreotide Autogel and Temozolomide Treatment of Progressive Pancreatic and Intestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors: The Phase II SONNET Study.

BACKGROUND: In advanced neuroendocrine tumors (NET), antiproliferative treatment options beyond somatostatin analogs remain limited. Temozolomide (TMZ) has shown efficacy in NET alone or combined with other drugs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: SONNET (NCT02231762) was an open, multicenter, prospective, phase II study to evaluate lanreotide autogel 120 mg (LAN) plus TMZ in patients with progressive advanced/metastatic grade 1/2 gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) NET or of unknown primary. Patients could be enrolled at first-line or higher therapy line. The primary endpoint was disease control rate ([DCR], rate of stable disease [SD], partial [PR], and complete response [CR]) at 6 months of LAN and TMZ. Patients with nonfunctioning (NF) NET without progression at 6 months were randomized to 6-month LAN maintenance or watch and wait, patients with functioning (F)-NET with clinical benefit (PR, SD) continued on LAN. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients were recruited. The majority of patients received the study drug at second or higher treatment line and had an NET G2. DCR at 6 months LAN and TMZ was 73.5%. After 6 months of further LAN maintenance, 54.5% of patients with F-NET and 71.4% with NF-NET had SD or PR vs 41.7% with NF-NET on observation only. LAN and TMZ were effective in all subgroups analyzed. At 12 months of follow-up, median progression-free survival was 11.1 months. Median serum chromogranin A decreased except in NF-NET on observation. O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase promoter methylation appeared to better reflect TMZ response than loss of gene expression. During combination therapy, the most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events grade 3/4 reported were nausea (14%), thrombocytopenia (12.3%), and neutropenia (8.8%). Four deaths were reported resulting from severe adverse events not considered related to study medication. CONCLUSIONS: LAN plus TMZ is a treatment option for patients with progressive GEP-NET with more aggressive biological profile showing a manageable safety profile.

Systemic Therapy for Tumor Control in Metastatic Well-Differentiated Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: ASCO Guideline.

PURPOSE: To develop recommendations for systemic therapy for well-differentiated grade 1 (G1) to grade 3 (G3) metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs). METHODS: ASCO convened an Expert Panel to conduct a systematic review of relevant studies and develop recommendations for clinical practice. RESULTS: Eight randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review. RECOMMENDATIONS: Somatostatin analogs (SSAs) are recommended as first-line systemic therapy for most patients with G1-grade 2 (G2) metastatic well-differentiated GI-NETs. Observation is an option for patients with low-volume or slow-growing disease without symptoms. After progression on SSAs, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is recommended as systematic therapy for patients with somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-positive tumors. Everolimus is an alternative second-line therapy, particularly in nonfunctioning NETs and patients with SSTR-negative tumors. SSAs are standard first-line therapy for SSTR-positive pancreatic (pan)NETs. Rarely, observation may be appropriate for asymptomatic patients until progression. Second-line systemic options for panNETs include PRRT (for SSTR-positive tumors), cytotoxic chemotherapy, everolimus, or sunitinib. For SSTR-negative tumors, first-line therapy options are chemotherapy, everolimus, or sunitinib. There are insufficient data to recommend particular sequencing of therapies. Patients with G1-G2 high-volume disease, relatively high Ki-67 index, and/or symptoms related to tumor growth may benefit from early cytotoxic chemotherapy. For G3 GEP-NETs, systemic options for G1-G2 may be considered, although cytotoxic chemotherapy is likely the most effective option for patients with tumor-related symptoms, and SSAs are relatively ineffective. Qualifying statements are provided to assist with treatment choice. Multidisciplinary team management is recommended, along with shared decision making with patients, incorporating their values and preferences, potential benefits and harms, and other characteristics and circumstances, such as comorbidities, performance status, geographic location, and access to care.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/gastrointestinal-cancer-guidelines.

Consensus report of the 2021 National Cancer Institute neuroendocrine tumor clinical trials planning meeting.

Important progress has been made over the last decade in the classification, imaging, and treatment of neuroendocrine neoplasm (NENs), with several new agents approved for use. Although the treatment options available for patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) have greatly expanded, the rapidly changing landscape has presented several unanswered questions about how best to optimize, sequence, and individualize therapy. Perhaps the most important development over the last decade has been the approval of 177Lu-DOTATATE for treatment of gastroenteropancreatic-NETs, raising questions around optimal sequencing of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) relative to other therapeutic options, the role of re-treatment with PRRT, and whether PRRT can be further optimized through use of dosimetry among other approaches. The NET Task Force of the National Cancer Institute GI Steering Committee convened a clinical trial planning meeting in 2021 with multidisciplinary experts from academia, the federal government, industry, and patient advocates to develop NET clinical trials in the era of PRRT. Key clinical trial recommendations for development included 1) PRRT re-treatment, 2) PRRT and immunotherapy combinations, 3) PRRT and DNA damage repair inhibitor combinations, 4) treatment for liver-dominant disease, 5) treatment for PRRT-resistant disease, and 6) dosimetry-modified PRRT.

Management of Functional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.

OPINION STATEMENT: Functional pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs) are rare and heterogeneous diseases in terms of both clinical and pathological aspects. These tumors secrete hormones or peptides, which may cause a wide variety of symptoms related to a clinical syndrome. The management of functional pNENs is still challenging for clinicians due to the need to control both tumor growth and specific symptoms. Surgery remains the cornerstone in the management of local disease because it can definitively cure the patient. However, when the disease is not resectable, a broad spectrum of therapeutic options, including locoregional therapy, somatostatin analogs (SSAs), targeted therapies, peptide-receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), and chemotherapy, are available. The present review summarizes the main key issues regarding the clinical management of these tumors, providing a specific highlight on their therapeutic approach.

Well-Differentiated Grade 3 Neuroendocrine Tumors: Characteristics, Treatments, and Outcomes From a Population-Based Study.

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated a population-based cohort of metastatic well-differentiated grade 3 gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (G3 NETs) to describe their characteristics, prognosis, and treatment outcomes. METHODS: The British Columbia provincial database was queried for G3 NETs diagnosed 2004 to 2021, and charts were reviewed to describe clinical features and outcomes. RESULTS: Forty-one patients were identified, most were diagnosed with pancreatic (58.5%) or midgut (26.8%) primary tumor and Ki-67 was less than 55% in 68.3%. The primary was resected in 19 (46.3%) with median disease-free survival of 25.2 months. Once metastatic, patients received a median of one line of systemic therapy. Median overall survival with metastatic disease was 33.8 months. Median progression-free survival was longest in patients treated with capecitabine-temozolomide (20.6 months) or somatostatin analogs (7.9 months), while etoposide-platinum provided little benefit (2.4 months). Limited data of efficacy for targeted therapies and radionuclide therapy was available. Seven patients (17.1%) were also treated with local therapies, which were associated with improved overall survival (median not reached, hazard ratio, 0.23; P = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: Capecitabine-temozolomide and somatostatin analogs were associated with clinically meaningful benefit, and use of local therapies provided benefits in selected patients. Multidisciplinary discussion is essential to optimize individual outcomes in this heterogeneous population.

The real-world selection of first-line systemic therapy regimen for metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm in Japan.

In November 2013, the first edition of evidence-based guidelines for treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm (GEP-NEN) was published in Japan. However, whether medical practitioners have adopted the first-line regimens recommended for metastatic GEP-NEN in clinical practice is not yet known. The purpose of this study was to identify which first-line systemic therapy regimens have been selected and the proportion of cases that are adherent to the guidelines (i.e., number of patients receiving recommended therapy/total number of patients). We combined hospital-based cancer registry data and insurance claims-equivalent data for patients with GEP-NEN treated between January 2013 and December 2014 and extracted those with metastatic GEP-NEN who received systemic therapy. The proportions that were adherent with the guideline were calculated according to tumor classification (neuroendocrine tumor [NET] or neuroendocrine carcinoma [NEC]), primary site (gastrointestinal or pancreatic), and hospital volume (high, medium, or low). The study included 109 patients with GEP-NET and 424 with GEP-NEC. Overall, guideline-adherent treatment was provided in only 54.8% of cases (58.1% for gastrointestinal NET, 63.6% for pancreatic NET, 56.6% for gastrointestinal NEC, and 44.9% for pancreatic NEC). The recommended therapy for GEP-NET was used in 16.5% of patients with GEP-NEC, and 21.5% received fluoropyrimidine-containing chemotherapy. This report is the first to describe real-world selection of first-line regimens for metastatic GEP-NEN. About half of all these patients received systemic therapy that was not recommended in the guidelines.

Novel preclinical gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasia models demonstrate the feasibility of mutation-based targeted therapy.

PURPOSE: Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NEN) form a rare and remarkably heterogeneous group of tumors. Therefore, establishing personalized therapies is eminently challenging. To achieve progress in preclinical drug development, there is an urgent need for relevant tumor models. METHODS: We successfully established three gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (GEP-NET) cell lines (NT-18P, NT-18LM, NT-36) and two gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (GEP-NEC) cell lines (NT-32 and NT-38). We performed a comprehensive characterization of morphology, NET differentiation, proliferation and intracellular signaling pathways of these five cell lines and, in addition, of the NT-3 GEP-NET cell line. Additionally, we conducted panel sequencing to identify genomic alterations suitable for mutation-based targeted therapy. RESULTS: We found that the GEP-NEN cell lines exhibit a stable neuroendocrine phenotype. Functional kinome profiling revealed a higher activity of serine/threonine kinases (STK) as well as protein tyrosine kinases (PTK) in the GEP-NET cell lines NT-3 and NT-18LM compared to the GEP-NEC cell lines NT-32 and NT-38. Panel sequencing revealed a mutation in Death Domain Associated Protein (DAXX), sensitizing NT-18LM to the Ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3 related (ATR) inhibitor Berzosertib, and a mutation in AT-Rich Interaction Domain 1A (ARID1A), sensitizing NT-38 to the Aurora kinase A inhibitor Alisertib. Small interfering RNA-mediated knock down of DAXX in the DAXX wild type cell line NT-3 sensitized these cells to Berzosertib. CONCLUSIONS: The newly established GEP-NET and GEP-NEC cell lines represent comprehensive preclinical in vitro models suitable to decipher GEP-NEN biology and pathogenesis. Additionally, we present the first results of a GEP-NEN-specific mutation-based targeted therapy. These findings open up new potentialities for personalized therapies in GEP-NEN.

Systemic Therapy of Advanced Well-differentiated Small Bowel Neuroendocrine Tumors Progressive on Somatostatin Analogues.

OPINION STATEMENT: Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a heterogeneous group of tumors whose management requires a nuanced and multi-disciplinary approach in order to control symptoms, halt tumor growth, and improve survival outcomes. Of late, the treatment landscape of NENs has advanced considerably as a result of several pivotal clinical trials, which have established somatostatin analogues as first-line therapy for advanced, metastatic, well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). However, an evolving classification system as well as an increased understanding of distinct clinical, molecular, and biologic features contribute to complexity in management. In particular, there remains limited randomized prospective data in the somatostatin analogue (SSA)-refractory setting for patients with primary tumors that originate in the small bowel. For well-differentiated small bowel neuroendocrine tumors (SBNETs), treatment beyond SSAs includes radionuclide therapy, targeted agents, liver-directed therapy, and to a lesser extent, cytotoxic chemotherapy. In the current era, selection of these agents is largely based on expert opinion in the context of patient and tumor characteristics without definitive data on the preferred order of agents to administer. In this review, we aim to describe the treatment landscape of metastatic SBNETs beyond SSAs and provide an overview of novel treatments which are currently under clinical evaluation.

Laboratory variables as predictors of progression in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in different lines of antineoplastic treatments.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the association of red cell blood counts, and liver panel tests to predict outcomes in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors who underwent systemic antineoplastic treatments. METHODS: Patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in systemic treatment were assessed according to laboratory tests within the same period. Progression free survival was determined by the period between the beginning of treatment and the date of progression. We used conditional models (PWP model) to verify the association between laboratory tests and tumor progression. The level of significance used was 5%. RESULTS: A total of 30 treatments given to 17 patients in the intention-to-treat population were evaluated. Treatment included octreotide, lanreotide, everolimus, lutetium, and chemotherapy. We had statistically significant results in chromogranin A, neutrophils and platelets-to-lymphocyte ratio. The risk of progression increases by 2% with the addition of 100ng/mL of chromogranin A (p=0.034), 4% with the increase of 100 neutrophil units (p=0.006), and 21% with the addition of 10 units in platelets-to-lymphocyte ratio (p=0.002). CONCLUSION: Chromogranin A, neutrophils and platelets-to-lymphocyte ratio were associated with disease progression during systemic treatment in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Further prospective studies with larger cohorts are necessary to validate our findings.

[Difficulties and challenges in pathological diagnosis of gastrointestinal pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors].

In the 5th edition of WHO Classification of Digestive System Tumours, the classification and designation of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm (GEP-NEN) were updated, and G3 was redefined. Therefore, the differential diagnosis between well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumour G3(NETG3) and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC) is both important and difficult, which has important clinical treatment and prognostic significance. Based on the latest WHO and 2020 Chinese consensus on pathological diagnosis of GEP-NEN, this paper proposed a comprehensive analysis on the differential diagnosis of gastrointestinal pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor from four aspects, including tumor morphological differentiation、tumor proliferative activity, gene change and disease progression. However, even with the above four diagnostic tools, there are still some difficulties and challenges in the work of pathological diagnosis. This paper briefly expounds and discusses them together, in order to improve the clinical application value.

Comparing Somatostatin Analogs in the Treatment of Advanced Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.

BACKGROUND: The 2 approved somatostatin analogs (SSAs) in the first-line treatment of advanced, well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) are octreotide long-acting release (Sandostatin LAR) and somatuline depot (Lanreotide). The study's objective was to compare progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients (pts) with GEP-NETs treated with somatuline or octreotide LAR. Pts and Methods: Pts with advanced well-differentiated GEP-NET who received either SSA at Emory University between 1995 and 2019 were included after institutional review board approval. The primary end point was PFS, defined as time to disease progression (according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1, or clinical progression) or death. The secondary end point was OS. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated, and log-rank tests were conducted to compare the survival outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 105 pts were identified. The mean age was 62.1 years (SD ± 11.8). The male-to-female ratio was 51:54. The majority (N = 69, 65.7%) were white. Most pts had grade 2 (G2) disease (N = 44, 41.9%). Primary location was small bowel in 58 (55.2%), pancreas in 27 (25.7%), and other in 20 (19.0%). Functional tumors were defined in 32 pts distributed equally between the 2 groups. Distribution of treatment was similar in the 2 groups, with 54 receiving octreotide LAR and 51 receiving somatuline depot. The median PFS for the octreotide LAR and somatuline depot groups was 12 months (95% CI, 6-18 months) and 10.8 months (95% CI, 6-15.6 months), respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.2665). For pts with G1 disease, the median PFS for the octreotide LAR and somatuline depot was 8.4 versus 32.4 months, respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.159). For G2 disease, the difference in median PFS between octreotide LAR and somutaline depot groups was statistically significant (12 vs. 7.2 months, respectively; p = 0.0372). The mean follow-up time for octreotide LAR was 21.6 months versus 11.3 months for somatuline depot. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, there was no difference in PFS between octreotide LAR and somatuline depot for pts with well-differentiated, metastatic GEP-NETs. A prospective study is worth designing selecting for G.

External Validity of Somatostatin Analogs Trials in Advanced Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: The GETNE-TRASGU Study.

INTRODUCTION: Somatostatin analogs (SSA) prolong progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs). However, the eligibility criteria in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have been restricted, which contrasts with the vast heterogeneity found in NENs. METHODS: We identified patients with well-differentiated (Ki-67% ≤20%), metastatic GEP-NENs treated in first line with SSA monotherapy from the Spanish R-GETNE registry. The therapeutic effect was evaluated using a Bayesian Cox model. The objective was to compare survival-based outcomes from real-world clinical practice versus RCTs. RESULTS: The dataset contained 535 patients with a median age of 62 years (range: 26-89). The median Ki-67% was 4 (range: 0-20). The most common primary tumor sites were as follows: midgut, 46%; pancreas, 34%; unknown primary, 10%; and colorectal, 10%. Half of the patients received octreotide LAR (n = 266) and half, lanreotide autogel (n = 269). The median PFS was 28.0 months (95% CI: 22.1-32.0) for octreotide versus 30.1 months (95% CI: 23.1-38.0) for lanreotide. The overall hazard ratio for lanreotide versus octreotide was 0.90 (95% credible interval: 0.71-1.12). The probability of effect sizes >30% with lanreotide versus octreotide was 2 and 6% for midgut and foregut NENs, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our study evaluated the external validity of RCTs examining SSAs in the real world, as well as the main effect-modifying factors (progression status, symptoms, tumor site, specific metastases, and analytical data). Our results indicate that both octreotide LAR and lanreotide autogel had a similar effect on PFS. Consequently, both represent valid alternatives in patients with well-differentiated, metastatic GEP-NENs.

Multi-ancestral origin of intestinal tumors: Impact on growth, progression, and drug efficacy.

BACKGROUND: Data are steadily accruing that demonstrate that intestinal tumors are frequently derived from multiple founding cells, resulting in tumors comprised of distinct ancestral clones that might cooperate or alternatively compete, thereby potentially impacting different phases of the disease process. AIM: We sought to determine whether tumors with a multi-ancestral architecture involving at least two distinct clones show increased tumor number, growth, progression, or resistance to drug intervention. METHODS: Mice carrying the Min allele of Apc were generated that were mosaic with only a subset of cells in the intestinal epithelium expressing an activated form of PI3K, a key regulatory kinase affecting several important cellular processes. These cells were identifiable as they fluoresced green, whereas all other cells fluoresced red. RESULTS: Cell lineage tracing revealed that many intestinal tumors from our mouse model were derived from at least two founding cells, those expressing the activated PI3K (green) and those which did not (red). Heterotypic tumors with a multi-ancestral architecture as evidenced by a mixture of green and red cells exhibited increased tumor growth and invasiveness. Clonal architecture also had an impact on tumor response to low-dose aspirin. Aspirin treatment resulted in a greater reduction of heterotypic tumors derived from multiple founding cells as compared to tumors derived from a single founding cell. CONCLUSION: These data indicate that genetically distinct tumor-founding cells can contribute to early intratumoral heterogeneity. The coevolution of the founding cells and their progeny enhances colon tumor progression and impacts the response to aspirin. These findings are important to a more complete understanding of tumorigenesis with consequences for several distinct models of tumor evolution. They also have practical implications to the clinic. Mouse models with heterogenous tumors are likely better for predicting drug efficacy as compared to models in which the tumors are highly homogeneous. Moreover, understanding how interactions among different populations in a single heterotypic tumor with a multi-ancestral architecture impact response to a single agent and combination therapies are necessary to fully develop personalized medicine.