Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 3.627
Filtrar
Más filtros











Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Prev Sci ; 25(6): 910-918, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39230657

RESUMEN

Tobacco retail outlet (TRO) density has been associated with increased cotinine levels in pregnant persons and their children. As such, the higher densities of TROs may represent higher levels of active smoking during pregnancy. The purpose of this study is to simulate the reduction in cotinine (a biomarker of smoke exposure) and health care utilization that could occur in pregnant persons under enactment of several candidate TRO reduction policy recommendations. Using existing retail outlet data from the state of North Carolina and from the Newborn Epigenetic Study (NEST), the present study created hypothetical policy-informed datasets of TROs that a) limited the number of TROs to the same density as the 2014 San Francisco (SF) policy (Policy 1), b) set the minimum distance to 500 feet between TROs from a school and from other TROs (Policy 2), c) restricted the types of TROs to exclude pharmacies (Policy 3), and d) a combination of Policies 1-3 (Policy 4). We estimated the effects of each policy individually and in a separate model with their combined effects in terms of the reduction on cotinine levels and health care utilization, as measured by number of visits to the emergency department (ED). We found that the hypothetical policies were likely to be effective in reducing maternal cotinine and ED visits, with the majority of the mothers in the dataset demonstrating reductions in these outcomes after implementation of the policies. We found that Policy 1 led to moderate reductions in TRO exposure for the majority of the sample as well as stratified by race/ethnicity. Additionally, Policy 4 had slightly larger estimated effects than Policy 1, but could be more onerous to implement in practice. Overall, we identified evidence supporting the efficacy of TRO reduction strategies that could impact smoke exposure during pregnancy in our diverse sample in North Carolina.


Asunto(s)
Cotinina , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , North Carolina , Contaminación por Humo de Tabaco/prevención & control , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Productos de Tabaco , Atención Perinatal , Política de Salud , Comercio
2.
Environ Health Perspect ; 132(9): 97003, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39226183

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Exposure to lead during childhood is detrimental to children's health. The extent to which the association between lead exposure and elementary school academic outcomes varies across geography is not known. OBJECTIVE: Estimate associations between blood lead levels (BLLs) and fourth grade standardized test scores in reading and mathematics in North Carolina using models that allow associations between BLL and test scores to vary spatially across communities. METHODS: We link geocoded, individual-level, standardized test score data for North Carolina public school students in fourth grade (2013-2016) with detailed birth records and blood lead testing data retrieved from the North Carolina childhood blood lead state registry on samples typically collected at 1-6 y of age. BLLs were categorized as: 1µg/dL (reference), 2µg/dL, 3-4µg/dL and ≥5µg/dL. We then fit spatially varying coefficient models that incorporate information sharing (smoothness), across neighboring communities via a Gaussian Markov random field to provide a global estimate of the association between BLL and test scores, as well as census tract-specific estimates (i.e., spatial coefficients). Models adjusted for maternal- and child-level covariates and were fit separately for reading and math. RESULTS: The average BLL across the 91,706 individuals in the analysis dataset was 2.84µg/dL. Individuals were distributed across 2,002 (out of 2,195) census tracts in North Carolina. In models adjusting for child sex, birth weight percentile for gestational age, and Medicaid participation as well as maternal race/ethnicity, educational attainment, marital status, and tobacco use, BLLs of 2µg/dL, 3-4µg/dL and ≥5µg/dL were associated with overall lower reading test scores of -0.28 [95% confidence interval (CI): -0.43, -0.12], -0.53 (-0.69, -0.38), and -0.79 (-0.99, -0.604), respectively. For BLLs of 1µg/dL, 2µg/dL, 3-4µg/dL and ≥5µg/dL, spatial coefficients-that is, tract-specific adjustments in reading test score relative to the "global" coefficient-ranged from -9.70 to 2.52, -3.19 to 3.90, -11.14 to 7.85, and -4.73 to 4.33, respectively. Results for mathematics were similar to those for reading. CONCLUSION: The association between lead exposure and reading and mathematics test scores exhibits considerable heterogeneity across North Carolina communities. These results emphasize the need for prevention and mitigation efforts with respect to lead exposures everywhere, with special attention to locations where the cognitive impact is elevated. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP13898.


Asunto(s)
Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales , Plomo , Instituciones Académicas , Estudiantes , Humanos , North Carolina , Niño , Plomo/sangre , Femenino , Masculino , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudiantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Contaminantes Ambientales/sangre , Lectura , Preescolar , Matemática
3.
J Public Health Manag Pract ; 30(5): 688-700, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38985535

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: Most incident cases of cervical cancer in the United States are attributable to inadequate screening. Federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) serve a large proportion of women who are low-income, have no insurance, and are underserved-risk factors for insufficient cervical cancer screening. FQHCs must maintain quality measures to preserve their accreditation, address financial reimbursements, and provide quality care. Implementation of human papillomavirus (HPV) self-collection can improve cervical cancer screening coverage within FQHCs. OBJECTIVES: To understand perspectives from clinical personnel on current cervical cancer screening rates at FQHCs in North Carolina and the impact of implementing HPV self-collection among underscreened patients on screening rates and performance measures. DESIGN: The study used focus groups and key informant interviews. Coding-based thematic analysis was applied to both focus group and interview transcripts. Emergent themes regarding perspectives on self-collection implementation were mapped onto Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) constructs to identify future barriers and facilitators to implementation. SETTING: Two FQHCs in North Carolina and a cloud-based videoconferencing platform. PARTICIPANTS: Six FQHCs in North Carolina; 45 clinical and administrative staff from the 6 FQHCs; 1 chief executive officer (n = 6), 1 senior-level administrator (n = 6), 1 chief medical officer (n = 6), and 1 clinical data manager (n = 6) from each FQHC. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Achievement of clinical perspectives. RESULTS: Societal-, practice-, and patient-level factors currently contribute to subpar cervical cancer screening rates. HPV self-collection was expected to improve screening uptake among underscreened women at FQHCs, and thus quality and performance measures, by offering an alternative screening approach for in-clinic or at-home use. Implementation barriers include financial uncertainties and HPV self-collection not yet a Food and Drug Administration-approved test. CONCLUSION: HPV self-collection has potential to improve cervical cancer screening quality and performance measures of FQHCs. For a successful implementation, multilevel factors that are currently affecting low screening uptake need to be addressed. Furthermore, the financial implications of implementation and approval of HPV self-collection as a test for cervical cancer screening quality measures need to be resolved.


Asunto(s)
Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Grupos Focales , Infecciones por Papillomavirus , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino , Humanos , Femenino , North Carolina , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/diagnóstico , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/prevención & control , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Adulto , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Tamizaje Masivo/normas , Persona de Mediana Edad , Manejo de Especímenes/métodos , Investigación Cualitativa , Papillomaviridae/aislamiento & purificación , Papillomaviridae/patogenicidad
4.
Environ Health ; 23(1): 61, 2024 Jul 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38961410

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Drinking water at U.S. Marine Corps Base (MCB) Camp Lejeune, North Carolina was contaminated with trichloroethylene and other industrial solvents from 1953 to 1985. METHODS: A cohort mortality study was conducted of Marines/Navy personnel who, between 1975 and 1985, began service and were stationed at Camp Lejeune (N = 159,128) or MCB Camp Pendleton, California (N = 168,406), and civilian workers employed at Camp Lejeune (N = 7,332) or Camp Pendleton (N = 6,677) between October 1972 and December 1985. Camp Pendleton's drinking water was not contaminated with industrial solvents. Mortality follow-up was between 1979 and 2018. Proportional hazards regression was used to calculate adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) comparing mortality rates between Camp Lejeune and Camp Pendleton cohorts. The ratio of upper and lower 95% confidence interval (CI) limits, or CIR, was used to evaluate the precision of aHRs. The study focused on underlying causes of death with aHRs ≥ 1.20 and CIRs ≤ 3. RESULTS: Deaths among Camp Lejeune and Camp Pendleton Marines/Navy personnel totaled 19,250 and 21,134, respectively. Deaths among Camp Lejeune and Camp Pendleton civilian workers totaled 3,055 and 3,280, respectively. Compared to Camp Pendleton Marines/Navy personnel, Camp Lejeune had aHRs ≥ 1.20 with CIRs ≤ 3 for cancers of the kidney (aHR = 1.21, 95% CI: 0.95, 1.54), esophagus (aHR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.00, 1.54) and female breast (aHR = 1.20, 95% CI: 0.73, 1.98). Causes of death with aHRs ≥ 1.20 and CIR > 3, included Parkinson disease, myelodysplastic syndrome and cancers of the testes, cervix and ovary. Compared to Camp Pendleton civilian workers, Camp Lejeune had aHRs ≥ 1.20 with CIRs ≤ 3 for chronic kidney disease (aHR = 1.88, 95% CI: 1.13, 3.11) and Parkinson disease (aHR = 1.21, 95% CI: 0.72, 2.04). Female breast cancer had an aHR of 1.19 (95% CI: 0.76, 1.88), and aHRs ≥ 1.20 with CIRs > 3 were observed for kidney and pharyngeal cancers, melanoma, Hodgkin lymphoma, and chronic myeloid leukemia. Quantitative bias analyses indicated that confounding due to smoking and alcohol consumption would not appreciably impact the findings. CONCLUSION: Marines/Navy personnel and civilian workers likely exposed to contaminated drinking water at Camp Lejeune had increased hazard ratios for several causes of death compared to Camp Pendleton.


Asunto(s)
Agua Potable , Personal Militar , Exposición Profesional , Humanos , Masculino , Personal Militar/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Femenino , Estudios de Cohortes , North Carolina/epidemiología , Agua Potable/análisis , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Contaminantes Químicos del Agua/análisis , Contaminantes Químicos del Agua/efectos adversos , Tricloroetileno/análisis , Mortalidad
5.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 33(9): 1194-1202, 2024 Sep 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38980745

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Fertility counseling is recommended for adolescent and young adult women facing gonadotoxic cancer therapy. However, fertility care is subspecialized medical care offered at a limited number of institutions, making geographic access a potential barrier to guideline-concordant care. We assessed the relationship between geographic access and receipt of fertility counseling among adolescent and young adult women with cancer. METHODS: Using data from the North Carolina Central Cancer Registry, we identified women diagnosed with lymphoma, gynecologic cancer, or breast cancer at ages 15 to 39 years during 2004 to 2015. Eligible women were invited to complete an online survey on various topics, including fertility counseling. Geographic access was measured, using geocoded addresses, as vehicular travel time from residence to the nearest fertility clinic available at diagnosis. Multivariable regression models were used to examine the association between travel time and receipt of fertility counseling by provider type: health care provider versus fertility specialist. RESULTS: Analyses included 380 women. The median travel time to a fertility clinic was 31 (IQR: 17-71) minutes. Overall, 75% received fertility counseling from a health care provider and 16% by a fertility specialist. Women who lived ≥30 minutes from a clinic were 13% less likely to receive fertility counseling by a health care provider (prevalence ratio: 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.75-1.00) and 49% less likely to receive counseling by a fertility specialist (prevalence ratio: 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.28-0.93). CONCLUSIONS: Women who lived further away from fertility clinics were less likely to receive fertility counseling. IMPACT: Interventions to improve access to fertility counseling should include strategies to alleviate the burden of geographic access.


Asunto(s)
Consejo , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Femenino , Adolescente , North Carolina/epidemiología , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Consejo/estadística & datos numéricos , Sistema de Registros , Preservación de la Fertilidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Preservación de la Fertilidad/métodos , Neoplasias/terapia , Neoplasias/epidemiología
6.
J Am Dent Assoc ; 155(8): 687-698.e2, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38934969

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: People with special health care needs in long-term care settings have difficulty accessing a traditional dental office. The goal of the authors was to assess initial treatment decision concordance between dentists conducting traditional in-person examinations using mobile equipment and additional dentists conducting examinations using asynchronous teledentistry technology. METHODS: Six dentists from Access Dental Care, a North Carolina mobile dentistry nonprofit, saw new patients on-site at 12 participating facilities or asynchronously off-site with electronic dental records, radiographs, and intraoral images, all captured by an on-site dental hygienist. Off-site dentists were masked to other dentists' treatment need decisions; 3 through 5 off-site examinations were conducted for each on-site examination. Demographic and binary treatment need category data were collected. For the 3 most prevalent treatment types needed (surgery, restorative, and new removable denture), the authors calculated the percentage agreement and κ statistics with bootstrapped CIs (1,000 replicates). RESULTS: The 100 enrolled patients included 47 from nursing homes, 45 from Programs of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly, and 8 from group homes for those with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Mean (SD) age was 73.9 (16.5) years. Among dentate participants, the percentage agreement and bootstrapped κ (95% CI) were 87% and 0.74 (0.70 to 0.78) for surgery and 78% and 0.54 (0.50 to 0.58) for restorative needs, respectively, and among dentate and edentulous participants, they were 94% and 0.78 (0.74 to 0.83), respectively, for new removable dentures. CONCLUSIONS: The authors assessed the initial dental treatment decision concordance between on-site dentists conducting in-person examinations with a mobile oral health care delivery model and off-site dentists conducting examinations with asynchronous dentistry. Concordance was substantial for surgery and removable denture treatment decisions and moderate for restorative needs. Patient characteristics and facility type were not significant factors in the levels of examiner agreement. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: This evidence supports teledentistry use for patients with special health care needs and could help improve their access to oral health care.


Asunto(s)
Atención Dental para la Persona con Discapacidad , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Atención Dental para la Persona con Discapacidad/métodos , Anciano , Adulto , Telemedicina , North Carolina , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas
7.
N C Med J ; 85(3): 49-53, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38932935

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Tobacco use remains a leading cause of preventable morbidity and premature mortality. In December 2019, the federal age of sale for tobacco products increased from 18 to 21 years of age. This study aimed to evaluate the implementation of federal tobacco 21 policies in Pitt County, North Carolina (NC), by conducting multiple purchase attempts for cigarettes. METHOD: Stores in Pitt County that sold cigarettes were randomly sampled and visited by up to six different underage (18-20) buyers who attempted to buy cigarettes from January-March 2022. Buyers made a total of 217 cigarette purchase attempts from 49 Pitt County retailers. Analyses were conducted using SPSS Complex Samples (v.28/Macintosh) and estimate retailer prevalence of requesting identification (ID) and selling to underage buyers across multiple purchase attempts. RESULTS: On average, retailers failed to request ID in 15.4% of purchase attempts (95% CI: 9.4%-21.3%) and sold to an underage buyer 34.2% of the time (95% CI: 27.0-41.4%). Additionally, 75.5% (95% CI: 63.4%-84.6%) of retailers sold to an underage buyer at least once. LIMITATIONS: This study is limited to a single county in NC and to underage buyers aged 18 to 20. CONCLUSION: There is widespread non-compliance with federal age of sale policies for tobacco products in Pitt County, NC. State enforcement is warranted, and NC's youth access law should be amended to match the federal age of sale. Changes to the law should allow research involving underage purchases.


Asunto(s)
Comercio , Productos de Tabaco , North Carolina , Humanos , Productos de Tabaco/legislación & jurisprudencia , Productos de Tabaco/economía , Comercio/legislación & jurisprudencia , Adolescente , Adulto Joven
8.
PLoS One ; 19(6): e0305174, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38913659

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: HIV, opioid use disorder (OUD), and mental health challenges share multiple syndemic risk factors. Each can be effectively treated with routine outpatient appointments, medication management, and psychosocial support, leading implementers to consider integrated screening and treatment for OUD and mental health in HIV care. Provider perspectives are crucial to understanding barriers and strategies for treatment integration. METHODS: We conducted in-depth qualitative interviews with 21 HIV treatment providers and social services providers (12 individual interviews and 1 group interview with 9 participants) to understand the current landscape, goals, and priorities for integrated OUD, mental health, and HIV care. Providers were purposively recruited from known clinics in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina, U.S.A. Data were analyzed using applied thematic analysis in the NVivo 12 software program and evaluated for inter-coder agreement. RESULTS: Participants viewed substance use and mental health challenges as prominent barriers to engagement in HIV care. However, few organizations have integrated structured screening for substance use and mental health into their standard of care. Even fewer screen for opioid use. Although medication assisted treatment (MAT) is effective for mitigating OUD, providers struggle to connect patients with MAT due to limited referral options, social barriers such as housing and food insecurity, overburdened staff, stigma, and lack of provider training. Providers believed there would be clear benefit to integrating OUD and mental health treatment in HIV care but lacked resources for implementation. CONCLUSIONS: Integration of screening and treatment for substance use and mental health in HIV care could mitigate many current barriers to treatment for all three conditions. Efforts are needed to train HIV providers to provide MAT, expand resources, and implement best practices.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH , Tamizaje Masivo , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Investigación Cualitativa , Humanos , Infecciones por VIH/psicología , Infecciones por VIH/diagnóstico , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/terapia , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/psicología , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Salud Mental , Persona de Mediana Edad , Personal de Salud/psicología , North Carolina/epidemiología
9.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 20(1): 2347018, 2024 12 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38708779

RESUMEN

HPV vaccination coverage remains far below the national target of 80% among US adolescents, particularly in rural areas, which have vaccine uptake rates that are 10% points lower than non-rural areas on average. Primary care professionals (PCPs) can increase coverage by using presumptive recommendations to introduce HPV vaccination in a way that assumes parents want to vaccinate. Through semi-structured interviews, we explored PCPs' experiences and perceptions of using presumptive recommendations in rural- and non-rural-serving primary care clinics in North Carolina. Thematic analysis revealed that most PCPs in rural and non-rural contexts used presumptive recommendations and felt the strategy was an effective and concise way to introduce the topic of HPV vaccination to parents. At the same time, some PCPs raised concerns about presumptive recommendations potentially straining relationships with certain parents, including those who had previously declined HPV vaccine or who distrust medical authority due to their past experiences with the healthcare system. PCPs dealt with these challenges by using a more open-ended approach when introducing HPV vaccination to parents. In conclusion, our findings suggest that PCPs in both rural and non-rural settings see value in using presumptive recommendations to introduce HPV vaccination, but to adequately address concerns and ensure increased HPV vaccine uptake, PCPs can use simple and culturally sensitive language to ensure fully informed consent and to maintain parental trust. And to further strengthen HPV vaccine discussions, PCPs can utilize other effective HPV communication techniques, like the Announcement Approach, in discussing HPV vaccinations with hesitant parents.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Papillomavirus , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus , Padres , Atención Primaria de Salud , Investigación Cualitativa , Población Rural , Vacunación , Humanos , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/prevención & control , Masculino , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacunación/psicología , Adolescente , Padres/psicología , North Carolina , Adulto , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cobertura de Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Personal de Salud/psicología , Entrevistas como Asunto
10.
JCO Oncol Pract ; 20(8): 1109-1114, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38739876

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Patients living in rural communities have greater barriers to cancer care and poorer outcomes. We hypothesized that rural patients with prostate cancer have less access and receive different treatments compared with urban patients. METHODS: We used a population-based prospective cohort, the North Carolina Prostate Cancer Comparative Effectiveness and Survivorship Study, to compare differences in prostate cancer diagnosis, access to care, and treatment in patients by geographic residence. The 2013 rural-urban continuum code (RUCC) was used to determine urban (RUCC 1-3) versus rural (RUCC 4-9) location of residence. RESULTS: Patients with rural residence comprised 25% of the cohort (364 of 1,444); they were less likely to be White race and had lower income and educational attainment. Rural patients were more likely to have <12 cores on biopsy (47.1% v 35.7%; P < .001) and less likely (40.8% v 47.6%; P = .04) to receive multidisciplinary consultation. We observed significant differences in treatment between urban and rural patients, including rural patients receiving less active surveillance or observation (22.6% v 28.7%), especially in low-risk cancer (33.2% v 40.7%). On multivariable analysis that adjusted for patient and diagnostic factors, rural residence was associated with less use of active surveillance or observation over radical treatment (ie, surgery or radiation therapy; odds ratio, 0.49 v urban; P < .001) in patients with low-risk cancer. CONCLUSION: Patients with prostate cancer who live in rural versus urban areas experience several differences in care that are likely clinically meaningful, including fewer cores in the diagnostic biopsy, less utilization of multidisciplinary consultation, less use of active surveillance, or observation for low-risk disease. Future studies are needed to assess the efficacy of interventions in mitigating these disparities.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata , Población Rural , Población Urbana , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias de la Próstata/terapia , Neoplasias de la Próstata/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Anciano , Población Urbana/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , North Carolina/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes
11.
Cancer Causes Control ; 35(9): 1259-1269, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38758522

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Smoking is a modifiable lifestyle factor that has not been established as a prostate cancer risk factor, nor emphasized in prostate cancer prevention. Studies have shown that African American (AA) smokers have a poorer cancer prognosis than European Americans (EAs), while having a lower prevalence of heavy smoking. We examined the relationship between cigarette smoking and prostate cancer aggressiveness and assessed racial differences in smoking habits on the probability of high-aggressive prostate cancer. METHODS: Using data from the North Carolina-Louisiana Prostate Cancer Project (n = 1,279), prostate cancer aggressiveness was defined as high or low based on Gleason scores, serum prostate-specific antigen levels, and tumor stage. Cigarette smoking was categorized as current, former, or never smokers. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Self-reported current (OR = 1.99; 95% CI 1.30-3.06) smoking was associated with high-aggressive prostate cancer relative to never smokers. When stratified by self-reported race, the odds of having high-aggressive cancer increased among AA current (OR = 3.58; 95% CI 2.04-6.28) and former smokers (OR = 2.21; 95% CI 1.38-3.53) compared to AA never smokers, but the odds were diminished among the EA stratum (Pself-reported race x smoking status = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Cigarette smoking is associated with prostate cancer aggressiveness, a relationship modulated by self-reported race. Future research is needed to investigate types of cigarettes smoked and metabolic differences that may be contributing to the racial disparities observed.


Asunto(s)
Negro o Afroamericano , Fumar Cigarrillos , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Población Blanca , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias de la Próstata/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/etnología , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fumar Cigarrillos/efectos adversos , Fumar Cigarrillos/epidemiología , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Factores de Riesgo , North Carolina/epidemiología , Louisiana/epidemiología , Adulto , Fumar/epidemiología , Fumar/efectos adversos
12.
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf ; 278: 116349, 2024 Jun 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38714081

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Exposures to polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) contribute to cancer in the fire service. Fire investigators are involved in evaluations of post-fire scenes. In the US, it is estimated that there are up to 9000 fire investigators, compared to approximately 1.1 million total firefighting personnel. This exploratory study contributes initial evidence of PAH exposures sustained by this understudied group using worn silicone passive samplers. OBJECTIVES: Evaluate PAH exposures sustained by fire investigators at post-fire scenes using worn silicone passive samplers. Assess explanatory factors and health risks of PAH exposure at post-fire scenes. METHODS: As part of a cross-sectional study design, silicone wristbands were distributed to 16 North Carolina fire investigators, including eight public, seven private, and one public and private. Wristbands were worn during 46 post-fire scene investigations. Fire investigators completed pre- and post-surveys providing sociodemographic, occupational, and post-fire scene characteristics. Solvent extracts from wristbands were analyzed via gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Results were used to estimate vapor-phase PAH concentration in the air at post-fire scenes. RESULTS: Fire investigations lasted an average of 148 minutes, standard deviation ± 93 minutes. A significant positive correlation (r=0.455, p<.001) was found between investigation duration and PAH concentrations on wristbands. Significantly greater time-normalized PAH exposures (p=0.039) were observed for investigations of newer post-fire scenes compared to older post-fire scenes. Regulatory airborne PAH exposure limits were exceeded in six investigations, based on exposure to estimated vapor-phase PAH concentrations in the air at post-fire scenes. DISCUSSION: Higher levels of off-gassing and suspended particulates at younger post-fire scenes may explain greater PAH exposure. Weaker correlations are found between wristband PAH concentration and investigation duration at older post-fire scenes, suggesting reduction of off-gassing PAHs over time. Exceedances of regulatory PAH limits indicate a need for protection against vapor-phase contaminants, especially at more recent post-fire scenes.


Asunto(s)
Bomberos , Exposición Profesional , Hidrocarburos Policíclicos Aromáticos , Siliconas , Humanos , Hidrocarburos Policíclicos Aromáticos/análisis , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Estudios Transversales , North Carolina , Adulto , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Monitoreo del Ambiente/métodos , Contaminantes Ocupacionales del Aire/análisis , Cromatografía de Gases y Espectrometría de Masas , Muñeca
13.
J Environ Radioact ; 277: 107460, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38797071

RESUMEN

Radon is a naturally occurring radioactive gas that poses significant health risks to humans, including increased risk of lung cancer. This study investigates the association of neighborhood-level socioeconomic variables with radon testing and radon exposure levels in North Carolina between 2010 and 2020. Our analysis of the two largest commercial household radon tests reveals that 67% of census tracts had testing rates below 10 tests per 1000 population, indicating low testing prevalence. Low radon levels (<2 pCi/L) were detected in 74.1% of the tracts (n = 1626), while medium levels of 2-4 pCi/L and ≥4 pCi/L were observed in 17.2% (n = 378) and 1.6% (n = 36) of the tracts. A generalized spatial regression model was employed to analyze the association between neighborhood-level socioeconomic variables and radon testing rates (per 1000 households), controlling for median radon testing results. The results show a positive correlation (P-value <0.001) of testing rate with various indicators of neighborhood affluence including education level, income, and occupation. In contrast, neighborhood disadvantage, including poverty, unemployment, and public assistance, was associated with a lower radon-testing rate (P-value <0.001). These findings highlight the need for targeted interventions to address socioeconomic disparities in radon testing and promote awareness and access to testing resources in lower socio-economic neighborhoods. Improving testing rates can effectively address radon-related health risks in North Carolina and across the U.S.


Asunto(s)
Contaminantes Radiactivos del Aire , Radón , Características de la Residencia , Factores Socioeconómicos , Radón/análisis , North Carolina , Humanos , Contaminantes Radiactivos del Aire/análisis , Monitoreo de Radiación/métodos , Contaminación del Aire Interior/análisis , Contaminación del Aire Interior/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades Socioeconómicas en Salud
14.
Pediatr Blood Cancer ; 71(7): e31017, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38706206

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: National sickle cell disease (SCD) guidelines recommend oral hydroxyurea (HU) starting at 9 months of age, and annual transcranial Doppler (TCD) screenings to identify stroke risk in children aged 2-16 years. We examined prevalence and proportion of TCD screenings in North Carolina Medicaid enrollees to identify associations with sociodemographic factors and HU adherence over 3 years. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a longitudinal study with children ages 2-16 years with SCD enrolled in NC Medicaid from years 2016-2019. Prevalence of TCD screening claims was calculated for 3 years, and proportion was calculated for 12, 24, and 36 months of Medicaid enrollment. Enrollee HU adherence was categorized using HU proportion of days covered. Multivariable Poisson regression assessed for TCD screening rates by HU adherence, controlling for age, sex, and rurality. RESULTS: The prevalence of annual TCD screening was between 39.5% and 40.1%. Of those with 12-month enrollment, 77.8% had no TCD claims, compared to 22.2% who had one or higher TCD claims. Inversely, in children with 36 months of enrollment, 36.7% had no TCD claims compared to 63.3% who had one or higher TCD claims. The proportion of children with two or higher TCD claims increased with longer enrollment (10.5% at 12 months, 33.7% at 24 months, and 52.6% at 36 months). Children with good HU adherence were 2.48 (p < .0001) times more likely to have TCD claims than children with poor HU adherence. CONCLUSION: While overall TCD screening prevalence was low, children with better HU adherence and longer Medicaid enrollment had more TCD screenings. Multilevel interventions are needed to engage healthcare providers and families to improve both evidence-based care and annual TCD screenings in children with SCD.


Asunto(s)
Anemia de Células Falciformes , Antidrepanocíticos , Hidroxiurea , Ultrasonografía Doppler Transcraneal , Humanos , Anemia de Células Falciformes/tratamiento farmacológico , Anemia de Células Falciformes/epidemiología , Anemia de Células Falciformes/diagnóstico por imagen , Niño , Hidroxiurea/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Masculino , Adolescente , Preescolar , Estudios Longitudinales , Antidrepanocíticos/uso terapéutico , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Estudios de Seguimiento , North Carolina/epidemiología , Pronóstico
15.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 33(5): e5805, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38720402

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: In drug studies, research designs requiring no prior exposure to certain drug classes may restrict important populations. Since abuse-deterrent formulations (ADF) of opioids are routinely prescribed after other opioids, choice of study design, identification of appropriate comparators, and addressing confounding by "indication" are important considerations in ADF post-marketing studies. METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study using claims data (2006-2018) from a North Carolina private insurer [NC claims] and Merative MarketScan [MarketScan], we identified patients (18-64 years old) initiating ADF or non-ADF extended-release/long-acting (ER/LA) opioids. We compared patient characteristics and described opioid treatment history between treatment groups, classifying patients as traditional (no opioid claims during prior six-month washout period) or prevalent new users. RESULTS: We identified 8415 (NC claims) and 147 978 (MarketScan) ADF, and 10 114 (NC claims) and 232 028 (MarketScan) non-ADF ER/LA opioid initiators. Most had prior opioid exposure (ranging 64%-74%), and key clinical differences included higher prevalence of recent acute or chronic pain and surgery among patients initiating ADFs compared to non-ADF ER/LA initiators. Concurrent immediate-release opioid prescriptions at initiation were more common in prevalent new users than traditional new users. CONCLUSIONS: Careful consideration of the study design, comparator choice, and confounding by "indication" is crucial when examining ADF opioid use-related outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Formulaciones Disuasorias del Abuso , Analgésicos Opioides , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Proyectos de Investigación , Humanos , Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/prevención & control , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/epidemiología , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Adulto Joven , Adolescente , North Carolina/epidemiología , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada , Estudios de Cohortes , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos
16.
South Med J ; 117(5): 226-234, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38701842

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Opioid use disorder (OUD) is characterized as a chronic condition that was first outlined in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, and now the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision. It encompasses frequent opioid usage, cravings, the development of tolerance, withdrawal symptoms upon discontinuation, unsuccessful attempts to quit or reduce use, and recurrent use even when faced with negative consequences. Both national- and state-level data show that overdose deaths associated with prescription opioids are increasing at an alarming rate. The increasing overdose deaths from illicitly manufactured fentanyl and other synthetic opioids compound this epidemic's burden. The present study sought to determine the prevalence and potential factors associated with OUD in North Carolina. METHODS: Using the State Inpatient Database, a retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted to identify OUD-related discharges between 2000 and 2020. Descriptive statistics and rates of OUD per 1000 discharges were calculated. Simple and multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with increased odds of having an opioid use disorder diagnosis at discharge. The deviance-Pearson goodness of fit statistic was also used. Variables were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification, and International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification, codes in the discharge records. RESULTS: Of 19,370,483 hospitalizations that occurred between 2000 and 2020 in North Carolina, 483,250 were associated with OUD, a prevalence rate of 24.9 cases per 1000 discharges. The highest OUD rates were seen among adults who self-paid for their hospitalization, those with Medicaid, and those with other types of payors such as Workers' Compensation and the Indian Health Service; individuals between 25 and 54 years old; tobacco and alcohol users; Native American patients; patients located in urban areas; patients with lower household income; White patients; and female patients. OUD also was associated with increased odds of having one or more comorbid psychiatric disorders when controlling for other factors. CONCLUSIONS: Although preventive measures are crucial, including policies that discourage prescribing opioids for noncancer pain and those that target the manufacturing and distribution of synthetic opioids, providing integrated care for patients with OUD and co-occurring psychiatric and/or physical disorders is equally important. These findings suggest the need for a system-wide public health response focused on the expansion of primary prevention and treatment efforts, including crisis services, harm reduction services, and recovery programs.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Humanos , North Carolina/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/epidemiología , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Transversales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Prevalencia , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Adulto Joven , Adolescente , Anciano , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Pacientes Internos/estadística & datos numéricos
17.
J Womens Health (Larchmt) ; 33(8): 1034-1041, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38607557

RESUMEN

Objective: To describe the prevalence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) infection, and cervical cancer in a high-risk, underscreened incarcerated population and to evaluate the performance of current cervical cancer screening options to detect cervical precancer (CIN 2/3) in this population. Study Design: Deidentified data were obtained from all cytological, hrHPV DNA, and histopathological testing of cervical biopsies performed on people incarcerated at the North Carolina Correctional Institute for Women between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2020. These were linked to corresponding demographic data. The proportions of histopathological diagnoses of CIN2+ and CIN3+ immediately preceded by abnormal cytology testing or hrHPV testing were determined, and prevalence differences and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Results: A total of 15,319 individuals incarcerated at the North Carolina Correctional Institute for Women had at least one cytology result during 2013-2020. Of these, 2,829 (18%) had abnormal cervical cytology, and 3,724 (24.3%) had positive hrHPV testing. The detection of CIN2+ was 95.9% by preceding abnormal cervical cytology, 89.9% by preceding positive hrHPV testing (p = 0.03), and 96.5% by preceding positive co-testing. The detection rate of CIN3+ was 96.6% by preceding abnormal cervical cytology, 90.8% by preceding positive hrHPV testing (p = 0.12), and 96.6% by positive co-testing. Conclusion: In our sample, primary cytology and co-testing detected CIN2+ at higher rates when compared with primary hrHPV testing. This reinforces that incarcerated populations do not fall into average-risk populations for which current cervical cancer screening options are designed, which should be considered when performing screening in this population.


Asunto(s)
Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Tamizaje Masivo , Infecciones por Papillomavirus , Prisioneros , Displasia del Cuello del Útero , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino , Frotis Vaginal , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/diagnóstico , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Displasia del Cuello del Útero/diagnóstico , Displasia del Cuello del Útero/epidemiología , Displasia del Cuello del Útero/patología , Adulto , North Carolina/epidemiología , Prisioneros/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Prevalencia , Frotis Vaginal/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Adulto Joven
18.
Gynecol Oncol ; 186: 53-60, 2024 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38599112

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To identify predictors of referral and completion of germline genetic testing among newly diagnosed ovarian cancer patients, with a focus on geographic social deprivation, oncologist-level practices, and time between diagnosis and completion of testing. METHODS: Clinical and sociodemographic data were abstracted from medical records of patients newly diagnosed with ovarian cancer between 2014 and 2019 in the University of North Carolina Health System. Factors associated with referral for genetic counseling, completion of germline testing, and time between diagnosis and test results were identified using multivariable regression. RESULTS: 307/459 (67%) patients were referred for genetic counseling and 285/459 (62%) completed testing. The predicted probability of test completion was 0.83 (95% CI: 0.77-0.88) for patients with a referral compared to 0.27 (95% CI: 0.18-0.35) for patients without a referral. The predicted probability of referral was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.69-0.82) for patients at the 25th percentile of ZIP code-level Social Deprivation Index (SDI) and 0.67 (0.60-0.74) for patients at the 75th percentile of SDI. Referral varied by oncologist, with predicted probabilities ranging from 0.47 (95% CI: 0.32-0.62) to 0.93 (95% CI: 0.85-1.00) across oncologists. The median time between diagnosis and test results was 137 days (IQR: 55-248 days). This interval decreased by a predicted 24.46 days per year (95% CI: 37.75-11.16). CONCLUSIONS: We report relatively high germline testing and a promising trend in time from diagnosis to results, with variation by oncologist and patient factors. Automated referral, remote genetic counseling and sample collection, reduced out-of-pocket costs, and educational interventions should be explored.


Asunto(s)
Asesoramiento Genético , Pruebas Genéticas , Mutación de Línea Germinal , Neoplasias Ováricas , Derivación y Consulta , Humanos , Femenino , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Ováricas/genética , Neoplasias Ováricas/diagnóstico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pruebas Genéticas/estadística & datos numéricos , Pruebas Genéticas/métodos , Asesoramiento Genético/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , North Carolina , Instituciones Oncológicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos
19.
J Surg Res ; 298: 347-354, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38663261

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Reducing disparities in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates and mortality remains a priority. Mitigation strategies to reduce these disparities have largely been unsuccessful. The primary aim is to determine variables in models of healthcare utilization and their association with CRC screening and mortality in North Carolina. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis of publicly available data across North Carolina using variable reduction techniques with clustering to evaluate association of CRC screening rates and mortality was performed. RESULTS: Three million sixty-five thousand five hundred thirty-seven residents (32.1%) were aged 50 y or more. More than two-thirds (68.8%) were White, while 20.5% were Black. Approximately 61% aged 50 y or more underwent CRC screening (range: 44.0%-80.5%) and had a CRC mortality of 44.8 per 100,000 (range 22.8 to 76.6 per 100,000). Cluster analysis identified two factors, designated social economic education index (factor 1) and rural provider index (factor 2) for inclusion in the multivariate analysis. CRC screening rates were associated with factor 1, consisting of socioeconomic and education variables, and factor 2, comprised of the number of providers per 10,000 individuals aged 50 y or more and rurality. An increase in both factors 1 and 2 by one point would result in an increase in CRC screening rated by 6.8%. CRC mortality was associated with factor 2. An increase in one point in factor 1 results in a decrease in mortality risk by 10.9%. CONCLUSIONS: In North Carolina, using variable reduction with clustering, CRC screening rates were associated with the inter-relationship of the number of providers and rurality, while CRC mortality was associated with the inter-relationship of social, economic, and education variables.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Humanos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Transversales , North Carolina/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/estadística & datos numéricos , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Factores Socioeconómicos , Análisis por Conglomerados , Adulto
20.
Arch Sex Behav ; 53(5): 1645-1652, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38627295

RESUMEN

We sought to examine cervical cancer screening barriers by sexual orientation among low-income women in North Carolina. The MyBodyMyTest-3 Trial recruited low-income women (< 250% of federal poverty level) aged 25-64 years who were 1+ year overdue for cervical cancer screening. We compared perceptions of cervical cancer screening among those who self-identified as lesbian, gay, bisexual, or queer (LGBQ; n = 70) to straight/heterosexual women (n = 683). For both LGBQ and straight respondents, the greatest barriers to screening were lack of health insurance (63% and 66%) and cost (49% and 50%). LGBQ respondents were more likely than straight respondents to report forgetting to screen (16% vs. 8%, p = .05), transportation barriers (10% vs. 2%, p = .001), and competing mental or physical health problems (39% vs. 27%, p = .10). Addressing access remains important for improving cervical cancer screening among those under-screened. For LGBQ women, additional attention may be needed for reminders, co-occurring health needs, and transportation barriers.


Asunto(s)
Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Pobreza , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/diagnóstico , North Carolina , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/estadística & datos numéricos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Conducta Sexual , Minorías Sexuales y de Género/estadística & datos numéricos , Minorías Sexuales y de Género/psicología , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/psicología , Tamizaje Masivo/estadística & datos numéricos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA