Safety and efficacy of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in neuroendocrine tumors: A single center experience.

Peptide receptor radionucleotide therapy (PRRT) with 177Lu-dotatate is widely used for the treatment of patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). We analyzed data from 104 patients with NETs treated with 177Lu -dotatate at a US academic center between December 2017 and October 2020 to better understand patterns of long-term efficacy, safety, and toxicity in the real-world setting. 177Lu-dotatate (200 mCi) was administered every eight weeks for four doses. The most common sites of primary disease were small intestine NETs (n = 49, 47%), pancreatic NETs (n = 32, 31%), and lung NETs (n = 7, 7%). Twenty-seven percent had Ki-67 <3%, 49% had Ki-67 between 3-20%, and 13.5% had Ki-67 >20%. The cohort had been pretreated with a median of two prior lines of treatment. Forty percent had received prior liver-directed treatment. Seventy-four percent of patients completed all four doses of treatment. The objective response rate was 18%. The median time-to-treatment failure/death was significantly longer for small-bowel NETs when compared to pancreatic NETs (37.3 months vs. 13.2 months, p = 0.001). In a multivariate model, Ki-67, primary site, and liver tumor burden ≥50% were found to independently predict time-to-treatment failure/death. Around 40% of patients experienced adverse events of ≥grade 3 severity. Treatment-related adverse events leading to discontinuation of therapy happened in 10% of patients. Preexisting mesenteric/peritoneal disease was present in 33 patients; seven of these patients developed bowel-related toxicities including two grade 5 events. We also report two cases of delayed-onset minimal change nephrotic syndrome, which occurred 14 and 27 months after the last dose of PRRT. Lastly, we describe six patients who developed rapid tumor progression in the liver leading to terminal liver failure within 7.3 months from the start of PRRT, and identify potential risk factors associated with this occurrence, which will need further study.

Safety and Efficacy of 177 Lu-DOTATATE in Children and Young Adult Population : A Single-Center Experience.

PURPOSE: This single-center retrospective study explores the safety and efficacy of 177 Lu-DOTATATE in children and young adult population with metastatic/inoperable neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study is a retrospective analysis of all children and young adult patients (≤29 years) with advanced inoperable/metastatic epithelial or nonepithelial NETs who were administered a median of 4 cycles of 177 Lu-DOTATATE therapy and low-dose oral capecitabine as a radiosensitizer every 8-12 weeks, except 2 patients who received CAPTEM chemotherapy. The radiological response was assessed using RECIST 1.1 on interim and end-of-treatment 68 Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT. The primary endpoint was objective response rate, whereas disease control rate, toxicity profile, progression-free survival, and overall survival were secondary endpoints. RESULTS: Nineteen biopsy-proven NET patients (median age, 22 ± 10 years) with 8 of them adolescents (10-18 years) and the remaining young adults (19-29 years) were included. Fourteen patients had gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (pancreas being most common primary site), whereas the rest had non-gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor. A total of 65 cycles of 177 Lu-DOTATATE (range, 1-6 cycles) were administered with a median cumulative activity of 600 mCi (range, 100-1000 mCi). The objective response rate and disease control rate were 41% and 94%, respectively. Grade 1 and 2 adverse events were observed in 14 (74%) and 5 (26%) of 19 patients, respectively. In a total of 8 events (42%), 4 events each of disease progression and death occurred during a median follow-up of 80.1 months with an estimated 5-year progression-free survival and overall survival of 54% (95% confidence interval, 30-78) and 63% (95% confidence interval, 39-87), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: 177 Lu-DOTATATE appears safe and effective in children and young adults with metastatic/inoperable NETs. Large prospective trials are required to validate these results.

Safety and Efficacy of Para-Aminohippurate Coinfusion for Renal Protection During Peptide Receptor Radiotherapy in Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Para-aminohippurate, also known as p-aminohippuric acid (PAH), is used clinically to measure effective renal plasma flow. Preclinically, it was shown to reduce 177Lu-DOTATOC uptake in the kidneys while improving bioavailability compared with amino acid (AA) coinfusion. We report the safety and efficacy of PAH coinfusion during peptide receptor radiotherapy in patients with neuroendocrine tumors. Methods: Twelve patients with metastatic or unresectable gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors received 177Lu-DOTATOC in 33 treatment cycles. Either 8 g of PAH or a mixture of 25 g of arginine and 25 g of lysine were coinfused. Safety was assessed by monitoring laboratory data, including hematologic and renal data, as well as electrolytes obtained before and 24 h after treatment. For radiation dosimetry, whole-body scans were performed at 1, 24, and 48 h and a SPECT/CT scan was performed at 48 h, along with blood sampling at 5 min and 0.5, 2, 4, 24, and 48 h after administration. Absorbed dose estimations for the kidneys and bone marrow were performed according to the MIRD concept. Results: In 15 treatment cycles, PAH was coinfused. No changes in mean creatinine level, glomerular filtration rate, and serum electrolytes were observed before or 24 h after treatment when using PAH protection (P ≥ 0.20), whereas serum chloride and serum phosphate increased significantly under AA (both P < 0.01). Kidney-absorbed dose coefficients were 0.60 ± 0.14 Gy/GBq with PAH and 0.53 ± 0.16 Gy/GBq with AA. Based on extrapolated cumulative kidney-absorbed doses for 4 cycles, 1 patient with PAH protection and 1 patient with AA protection in our patient group would exceed the 23-Gy conservative threshold. The bone marrow-absorbed dose coefficient was 0.012 ± 0.004 Gy/GBq with PAH and 0.012 ± 0.003 Gy/GBq with AA. Conclusion: PAH is a promising alternative to AA for renal protection during peptide receptor radiotherapy. Further research is required to systematically investigate the safety profile and radiation dosimetry at varying PAH plasma concentrations.

Extravasation After [ 177 Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE Therapy.

ABSTRACT: Extravasation of the radiopharmaceutical during peptide receptor radionuclide therapy infusion is an unwanted infrequently reported event. We present the case of a 74-year old woman with a neuroendocrine tumor who was referred for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. During intravenous infusion of 7.4 GBq [ 177 Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE in the upper right arm, extravasation of the radiopharmaceutical occurred through a displaced intravenous catheter. Planar scintigraphy showed pooling of radioactivity in the right upper arm. After 24 hours, the swelling in the arm was decreased; however, erythema was increased. One week later, symptoms had disappeared, and the patient did not experience any complications during follow-up of 11 months.

SPECT/CT Image-Derived Absorbed Dose to Red Marrow Correlates with Hematologic Toxicity in Patients Treated with [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE.

Hematologic toxicity, although often transient, is the most common limiting adverse effect during somatostatin peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. This study investigated the association between Monte Carlo-derived absorbed dose to the red marrow (RM) and hematologic toxicity in patients being treated for their neuroendocrine tumors. Methods: Twenty patients each receiving 4 treatment cycles of [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE were included. Multiple-time-point 177Lu SPECT/CT imaging-based RM dosimetry was performed using an artificial intelligence-driven workflow to segment vertebral spongiosa within the field of view (FOV). This workflow was coupled with an in-house macroscale/microscale Monte Carlo code that incorporates a spongiosa microstructure model. Absorbed dose estimates to RM in lumbar and thoracic vertebrae within the FOV, considered as representations of the whole-body RM absorbed dose, were correlated with hematologic toxicity markers at about 8 wk after each cycle and at 3- and 6-mo follow-up after completion of all cycles. Results: The median of absorbed dose to RM in lumbar and thoracic vertebrae within the FOV (D median,vertebrae) ranged from 0.019 to 0.11 Gy/GBq. The median of cumulative absorbed dose across all 4 cycles was 1.3 Gy (range, 0.6-2.5 Gy). Hematologic toxicity was generally mild, with no grade 2 or higher toxicity for platelets, neutrophils, or hemoglobin. However, there was a decline in blood counts over time, with a fractional value relative to baseline at 6 mo of 74%, 97%, 57%, and 97%, for platelets, neutrophils, lymphocytes, and hemoglobin, respectively. Statistically significant correlations were found between a subset of hematologic toxicity markers and RM absorbed doses, both during treatment and at 3- and 6-mo follow-up. This included a correlation between the platelet count relative to baseline at 6-mo follow up: D median,vertebrae (r = -0.64, P = 0.015), D median,lumbar (r = -0.72, P = 0.0038), D median,thoracic (r = -0.58, P = 0.029), and D average,vertebrae (r = -0.66, P = 0.010), where D median,lumbar and D median,thoracic are median absorbed dose to the RM in the lumbar and thoracic vertebrae, respectively, within the FOV and D average,vertebrae is the mass-weighted average absorbed dose of all vertebrae. Conclusion: This study found a significant correlation between image-derived absorbed dose to the RM and hematologic toxicity, including a relative reduction of platelets at 6-mo follow up. These findings indicate that absorbed dose to the RM can potentially be used to understand and manage hematologic toxicity in peptide receptor radionuclide therapy.

Effectiveness and Safety of Retreatment with 177Lu-DOTATATE in Patients with Progressive Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Retrospective Real-World Study in the United States.

Advanced neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are associated with a poor prognosis. A regimen of 4 cycles of 177Lu-DOTATATE has been shown to improve both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced NETs. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study in the United States to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of additional cycles of 177Lu-DOTATATE therapy in patients with progressive NETs. Methods: This was a retrospective chart review of adults with advanced NETs. The patients had undergone initial treatment with up to 4 cycles of 177Lu-DOTATATE and, after disease progression and a period of at least 6 mo since the end of the initial treatment, were retreated with at least 1 additional cycle at a single center (2010-2020). Patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and clinical outcomes were evaluated descriptively. Response was evaluated according to RECIST 1.1; toxicity was defined using criteria from Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0. Kaplan-Meier plots were used to evaluate PFS and OS. Results: Of the 31 patients who received 177Lu-DOTATATE retreatment, 61% were male and 94% were White. Overall, patients received a median of 6 cycles (4 initial cycles and 2 retreatment cycles), and the mean administered activity was 41.9 GBq. Two patients also went on to receive additional retreatment (1 and 2 cycles, individually) after a second period of at least 6 mo and progression after retreatment. Best responses of partial response and stable disease were observed in 35% and 65% of patients after the initial treatment and 23% and 45% of patients after retreatment, respectively. The median PFS after the initial treatment was 20.2 mo and after retreatment was 9.6 mo. The median OS after the initial treatment was 42.6 mo and after retreatment was 12.6 mo. Hematologic parameters decreased significantly during both the initial treatment and retreatment but recovered such that there was little difference between the values before the initial treatment and before the retreatment. Clinically significant hematotoxicity occurred in 1 and 3 patients after the initial treatment and retreatment, respectively. No grade 3 or 4 nephrotoxicity was observed. Conclusion: Retreatment with 177Lu-DOTATATE after progression appeared to be well tolerated and offered disease control in patients with progressive NETs after initial 177Lu-DOTATATE treatment.

Efficacy and Safety of 225 Ac-DOTATATE in the Treatment of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms With High SSTR Expression.

PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 225 Ac-DOTATATE targeted α therapy (TAT) in various neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) with high somatostatin receptor (SSTR) expression. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This single-center prospective study included 10 patients with histologically diagnosed NENs that exhibited increased SSTR expression on 68 Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT imaging. All patients received 225 Ac-DOTATATE TAT. The primary end points were molecular imaging-based response and disease control rate (DCR), measured using the slightly modified Positron Emission Tomography Response Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.0. The secondary end points were adverse event profiles and clinical responses. The adverse event profile was determined according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Clinical response was assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 v3.0 (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life questionnaire version 3.0). RESULTS: A molecular imaging-based partial response was observed in 40% of all patients, SD in 40%, PD in 20%, and DCR in 80%. The DCR was 83.3% (5/6) in patients who were previously treated with 177 Lu-DOTATATE. According to the EORTC QLQ-C30 v3.0 score, most symptoms improved after 225 Ac-DOTATATE treatment, with only diarrhea showing no improvement. Grade III/IV hematological, kidney, and liver toxicities were not observed. The median follow-up time was 14 months (7-22 months), and no deaths were reported. CONCLUSIONS: This initial study suggests that 225 Ac-DOTATATE is a potentially promising option for treating NENs with elevated SSTR expression, with an acceptable toxicity profile and well-tolerated adverse effects.

Radiolabeled Somatostatin Receptor Antagonist Versus Agonist for Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy in Patients with Therapy-Resistant Meningioma: PROMENADE Phase 0 Study.

Our primary aim was to compare the therapeutic index (tumor-to-bone marrow and tumor-to-kidney absorbed-dose ratios) of the new radiolabeled somatostatin receptor antagonist [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-JR11 with the established radiolabeled somatostatin receptor agonist [177Lu]Lu-DOTATOC in the same patients with progressive, standard therapy-refractory meningioma. Methods: In this prospective, single-center, open-label phase 0 study (NCT04997317), 6 consecutive patients were included: 3 men and 3 women (mean age, 63.5 y). Patients received 6.9-7.3 GBq (standard injected radioactivity) of [177Lu]Lu-DOTATOC followed by 3.3-4.9 GBq (2 GBq/m2 × body surface area) of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-JR11 at an interval of 10 ± 1 wk. In total, 1 [177Lu]Lu-DOTATOC and 2-3 [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-JR11 treatment cycles were performed. Quantitative SPECT/CT was done at approximately 24, 48, and 168 h after injection of both radiopharmaceuticals to calculate meningioma and organ absorbed doses as well as tumor-to-organ absorbed-dose ratios (3-dimensional segmentation approach for meningioma, kidneys, liver, bone marrow, and spleen). Results: The median of the meningioma absorbed dose of 1 treatment cycle was 3.4 Gy (range, 0.8-10.2 Gy) for [177Lu]Lu-DOTATOC and 11.5 Gy (range, 4.7-22.7 Gy) for [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-JR11. The median bone marrow and kidney absorbed doses after 1 treatment cycle were 0.11 Gy (range, 0.05-0.17 Gy) and 2.7 Gy (range, 1.3-5.3 Gy) for [177Lu]Lu-DOTATOC and 0.29 Gy (range, 0.16-0.39 Gy) and 3.3 Gy (range, 1.6-5.9 Gy) for [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-JR11, resulting in a 1.4 (range, 0.9-1.9) times higher median tumor-to-bone marrow absorbed-dose ratio and a 2.9 (range, 2.0-4.8) times higher median tumor-to-kidney absorbed-dose ratio with [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-JR11. According to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0, 2 patients developed reversible grade 2 lymphopenia after 1 cycle of [177Lu]Lu-DOTATOC. Afterward, 2 patients developed reversible grade 3 lymphopenia and 1 patient developed reversible grade 3 lymphopenia and neutropenia after 2-3 cycles of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-JR11. No grade 4 or 5 adverse events were observed at 15 mo or more after the start of therapy. The disease control rate was 83% (95% CI, 53%-100%) at 12 mo or more after inclusion. Conclusion: Treatment with 1 cycle of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-JR11 showed 2.2-5.7 times higher meningioma absorbed doses and a favorable therapeutic index compared with [177Lu]Lu-DOTATOC after injection of 1.4-2.1 times lower activities. The first efficacy results demonstrated a high disease control rate with an acceptable safety profile in the standard therapy for refractory meningioma patients. Therefore, larger studies with [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-JR11 are warranted in meningioma patients.

Octreotide for long-lasting malignant bowel obstruction: two case reports.

BACKGROUND: Efficacy of the combination of octreotide and other drugs for the management of malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) has been well described. However, long-lasting stages with lack of stool emission are a challenging clinical condition of MBO that have never described. CASE DESCRIPTION: We describe two cases in which the addition of octreotide to supportive care measures, even given late after more than 3 weeks of no stool emission, resulted to be still effective in recovering the bowel transit. In the first case, a patient admitted to home palliative care had a nasogastric tube and reported to not have stool emission and passing gas for 25 days. Two days after starting the combination of octreotide and other drugs, the patient evacuated and the nasogastric tube was removed, without reporting nausea or episodes of vomiting. In the second case, a patient admitted to an acute palliative care unit, the patient had no stool emission for more than 3 weeks. A nasogastric tube was placed and comprehensive palliative care treatment was provided. Two days after starting a combination of octreotide and other drugs, the nasogastric tube was removed, without reporting vomiting. In both cases, bowel transit recovered and patients were able to initiate oral nutrition. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of octreotide with other drugs described for standard treatment for the management of MBO, should be attempted even in patients with very long periods of lack of feces emission.

Outcome on Mesenteric Mass Response of Small-Intestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors Treated by 177Lu-DOTATATE Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy: The MesenLuth Study, a National Study from the French Group of Endocrine Tumors and Endocan-RENATEN Network.

A mesenteric mass (MM), characterized by fibrotic reaction, is present in most small-intestinal neuroendocrine tumors (SI-NETs). 177Lu-DOTATATE peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has shown its efficacy in patients with progressive SI-NETs. However, because of specific tissue characteristics of desmoplastic MMs, we hypothesize that these lesions may be refractory to 177Lu-DOTATATE PRRT. Methods: From the national French Groupe d'étude des Tumeurs Endocrines database, we identified patients with an advanced SI-NET and a MM (≥2 cm with a retractile aspect) of a SI-NET treated by at least 1 course of 177Lu-DOTATATE PRRT. The primary endpoint was a MM objective response rate (ORR) of less than 5%. Secondary endpoints were metabolic response, MM-related safety, and clinical response, as well as MM progression-free survival (PFS) and non-MM PFS. Results: In total, 52 patients were included. The MM ORR was 4% (n = 2), and the non-MM ORR was 8% (n = 4). No patient had a MM metabolic response, and the non-MM metabolic response rate was 12% (n = 6). Among the 26 patients with baseline MM-related symptoms, 46% had a clinical response. Four patients presented with gastrointestinal complications during PRRT. The median MM-related PFS was not reached, and the non-MM PFS was 50.3 mo (95% CI, 38.2-61.7 mo). Conclusion: This study confirms that 177Lu-DOTATATE PRRT does not lead to morphologic response on MMs (ORR < 5%). However, it allows MM stability, with few MM-related side effects, and has a relevant impact on MM-related symptoms.

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy Is Effective for Clinical Control of Symptomatic Metastatic Insulinoma: A Long-Term Retrospective Analysis.

Metastatic insulinoma is a rare malignant neuroendocrine tumor characterized by inappropriate insulin secretion, resulting in life-threatening hypoglycemia, which is often difficult to treat. There is currently very limited information about the efficacy of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) for clinical control of hypoglycemia. The aim of this long-term retrospective study was to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of PRRT for improving hypoglycemia, to evaluate the change of medication after PRRT, and to calculate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Methods: Inclusion criteria were histologically proven somatostatin receptor-positive metastatic malignant insulinoma and at least 2 cycles of [90Y]Y-DOTATOC or [177Lu]Lu-DOTATOC therapy from early 2000 to early 2022. A semiquantitative scoring system was used to quantify the severity and frequency of hypoglycemic episodes under background antihypoglycemic therapy (somatostatin analog, diazoxide, everolimus, corticosteroids): score 0, no hypoglycemic episodes; score 1, hypoglycemic events requiring additional conservative treatment with optimization of nutrition; score 2, severe hypoglycemia necessitating hospitalization and combined medication or history of hypoglycemic coma. Hypoglycemic score before and after PRRT was analyzed. Time of benefit was defined as a time range of fewer hypoglycemic episodes in the observation period than at baseline. Information on antihypoglycemic medication before and after therapy, PFS, and OS was recorded. Results: Twenty-six of 32 patients with a total of 106 [90Y]Y-DOTATOC/[177Lu]Lu-DOTATOC cycles were included. The average observation period was 21.5 mo (range, 2.3-107.4 mo). Before therapy, 81% (n = 21) of the patients had a hypoglycemia score of 2 and 19% (n = 5) had a score of 1. After PRRT, 81% of patients (n = 21) had a decreased score, and the remaining 5 patients showed a stable situation. There was temporary worsening of hypoglycemia just after injection of [90Y]Y-DOTATOC/[177Lu]Lu-DOTATOC in 19% of patients. The average time of benefit in the observation period was 17.2 mo (range, 0-70.2 mo). Antihypoglycemic medication reduction was achieved in 58% (n = 15) of patients. The median OS and PFS after the start of PRRT were 19.7 mo (95% CI, 6.5-32.9 mo) and 11.7 mo (95% CI, 4.9-18.5 mo), respectively. Conclusion: To our knowledge, our study included the largest cohort of patients with malignant insulinoma to be evaluated. Long-lasting symptom control and reduction of antihypoglycemic medications were shown in most patients after late-line PRRT.

Methodology of the SORENTO clinical trial: a prospective, randomised, active-controlled phase 3 trial assessing the efficacy and safety of high exposure octreotide subcutaneous depot (CAM2029) in patients with GEP-NET.

BACKGROUND: The current standard of care (SoC) for the initial treatment of unresectable or metastatic well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NET) requires initiation of first-generation somatostatin receptor ligand (SRL) therapy, octreotide and lanreotide, which provide safe and efficacious tumour/symptom control in most patients. However, disease progression can occur with SoC SRL treatment and the optimal dose response of SRL remains unknown. Octreotide subcutaneous depot (CAM2029) is a novel, long-acting, high-exposure formulation that has shown greater bioavailability and improved administration than octreotide long-acting release (LAR) with a well-tolerated safety profile. Retrospective data have highlighted a potential benefit of high-exposure SRL for improved disease control in patients who did not adequately respond to the current SoC SRL treatment. This trial will investigate the efficacy and tolerability of CAM2029 compared to the current SoC, including octreotide LAR and lanreotide autogel (ATG). METHODS: SORENTO is a prospective, multicentre, randomised, active-controlled, open-label phase 3 trial aiming to demonstrate superiority of treatment with 20 mg octreotide subcutaneous depot (CAM2029) every 2 weeks (Q2W) compared to treatment with the Investigator's choice of SRL therapy at standard doses for tumour control (octreotide LAR 30 mg or lanreotide ATG 120 mg every 4 weeks [Q4W]) as assessed by progression-free survival (PFS) in approximately 300 patients with unresectable/metastatic and well-differentiated GEP-NET. Upon confirmation of disease progression (determined by a Blinded Independent Review Committee [BIRC] and defined as per RECIST 1.1), patients may enter an open-label extension treatment period with once weekly dosing, to investigate the effects of higher frequency dosing. Overall survival follow-up will end a maximum of 2 years after primary analysis. The primary endpoint will be analysed after 194 confirmed PFS events. DISCUSSION: This is the first trial investigating the efficacy of CAM2029 versus SoC SRL therapy using a head-to-head, superiority trial design. It is expected to be the first trial to investigate the efficacy of increased dosing frequency of a high-exposure SRL. A BIRC will limit bias and measurement variability and ensure high-quality efficacy data. Additionally, inclusion of patients with well-differentiated Grade 3 NET may elucidate treatment strategies for this rarely investigated patient population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05050942. Registered on 21st September 2021.

Long-term Nephrotoxicity after PRRT: Myth or Reality.

Rationale: The kidneys are commonly considered as the potential dose-limiting organ for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), making the risk of nephrotoxicity a primary concern. This retrospective analysis with prospective documentation and long-term follow-up aims to assess the risk of nephrotoxicity after PRRT in a large cohort of patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) treated at our institution over the past 18 years. Methods: A total of 1361 NEN patients treated with 1-10 cycles of 177Lu-DOTA-TOC/-NOC/-TATE, 90Y-DOTA-TOC/-NOC/-TATE, DUO-PRRT (sequential administration of 90Y- and 177Lu-), or TANDEM-PRRT (combination of 90Y- and 177Lu- on the same day concomitantly) were included in this analysis. All parameters were prospectively documented in a structured database comprising over 250 items per patient and retrospectively analyzed. Kidney function, including serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, cGFR, and electrolytes, was evaluated before each PRRT cycle and during follow-up. Restaging was regularly performed at 6-month intervals until death. Treatment-related adverse events were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v.5.0). Results: Between 2000 and 2018, a total of 5409 cycles of PRRT were administered to 1361 NEN patients. Follow-up after complete treatment was available for 1281 patients receiving 4709 cycles of PRRT, with a median follow-up time of 69.2 months (interquartile range, 32.8-110.5 months) and a maximum follow-up time of 175 months. Baseline creatinine levels were normal in 1039/1281 (81.1%) subjects, while grade 1 (G1) renal insufficiency was present in 221/1281 (17.3%) prior to PRRT. G2 was present in 19/1281 (1.5%), and G3 in 2/1281 (0.2%). After treatment, the proportion of G3/G4 grade patients only increased from 0.2% to 0.7%. Mean creatinine levels increased from a baseline of 0.90 ± 0.30 to 1.01 ± 0.57 mg/L (80.0 ± 26.7 to 89.4 ± 50.8 µmol/L) after treatment. In our main analysis cohort of 1244 patients (4576 cycles), 200 patients experienced an increase in CTCAE creatinine grade. Age, number of treatment cycles, type of radionuclides, and length of follow-up time were the main factors affecting CTCAE creatinine grading after treatment. When comparing the subgroups treated with different radionuclides, the risk of nephrotoxicity after 90Y treatment alone and the 90Y/177Lu combination group was higher than after 177Lu treatment alone. In the 90Y treatment subgroup, the two significant risk factors for an increased CTCAE creatinine grade were identified to be age (≥60) and a long follow-up time. Conclusions: This retrospective analysis with prospective documentation in a large cohort of 1281 NEN patients receiving 4709 cycles of PRRT co-administered with renal protection, treated through the individualized approach at a single institution over 18 years, did not reveal any evidence of long-term PRRT-related renal toxicity. The results of our study suggest that with the use of proper renal protection, nephrotoxicity due to PRRT is more likely a myth than a reality.

Intra-arterial peptide-receptor radionuclide therapy for neuro-endocrine tumour liver metastases: an in-patient randomised controlled trial (LUTIA).

PURPOSE: Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) using [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE has been shown to effectively prolong progression free survival in grade 1-2 gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NET), but is less efficacious in patients with extensive liver metastases. The aim was to investigate whether tumour uptake in liver metastases can be enhanced by intra-arterial administration of [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE into the hepatic artery, in order to improve tumour response without increasing toxicity. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with grade 1-2 GEP-NET, and bi-lobar liver metastases were randomized to receive intra-arterial PRRT in the left or right liver lobe for four consecutive cycles. The contralateral liver lobe and extrahepatic disease were treated via a "second-pass" effect and the contralateral lobe was used as the control lobe. Up to three metastases (> 3 cm) per liver lobe were identified as target lesions at baseline on contrast-enhanced CT. The primary endpoint was the tumour-to-non-tumour (T/N) uptake ratio on the 24 h post-treatment [177Lu]Lu-SPECT/CT after the first cycle. This was calculated for each target lesion in both lobes using the mean uptake. T/N ratios in both lobes were compared using paired-samples t-test. FINDINGS: After the first cycle, a non-significant difference in T/N uptake ratio was observed: T/NIA = 17·4 vs. T/Ncontrol = 16·2 (p = 0·299). The mean increase in T/N was 17% (1·17; 95% CI [1·00; 1·37]). Of all patients, 67% (18/27) showed any increase in T/N ratio after the first cycle. CONCLUSION: Intra-arterial [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE is safe, but does not lead to a clinically significant increase in tumour uptake.

Extended peptide receptor radionuclide therapy: evaluating nephrotoxicity and therapeutic effectiveness in neuroendocrine tumor patients receiving more than four treatment cycles.

PURPOSE: Currently, the most used peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) regimen for neuroendocrine tumors comprises 4 treatment cycles, and there is not enough large-scale data to support the safety of more individualized extended PRRT. This study aims to evaluate the therapeutic effectiveness and potential nephrotoxicity related to PRRT using more than four treatment cycles. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, we included patients who had received at least four PRRT cycles and had available follow-up data. We analyzed renal function indicators before and after multiple treatments, comparing nephrotoxicity in patients receiving four cycles ("standard") with those receiving more than four ("extended treatment"). Nephrotoxicity was assessed via creatinine levels and CTCAE creatinine grades. Treatment effectiveness was gauged using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, focusing on overall survival and disease-specific survival (DSS). Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 26 (IBM), R 4.2.3, and GraphPad Prism 9.0.0. Statistical significance was defined as a P-value of less than 0.05. RESULTS: Our study cohort consisted of 281 patients in the standard group and 356 in the extended treatment group. No significant differences in baseline characteristics or renal function were noted between the two groups pre-treatment. Mean post-treatment creatinine levels did not significantly differ between the standard (89.30 ± 51.19 µmol/L) and extended treatment groups (93.20 ± 55.98 µmol/L; P = 0.364). Similarly, there was no statistical significance between the CTCAE creatinine grades of the two groups (P = 0.448). Adverse renal events were observed in 0.4% of patients in the standard group and 1.1% in the extended treatment group. After a median follow-up time of 88.3 months, we found that median overall survival was significantly higher in the extended treatment group (72.8 months) compared to the standard treatment group (52.8 months). A Cox regression analysis further supported these findings, indicating a better prognosis for the extended treatment group in terms of overall survival (HR: 0.580, P < 0.001) and DSS (HR: 0.599, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that extending PRRT treatment beyond the standard four cycles may be a safe and effective therapeutic strategy for NET patients. This approach could be particularly beneficial for patients experiencing disease recurrence or progression following standard treatment.

Efficacy and Safety of Lu-177 DOTATATE Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy in Patients with Unresectable or Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors in Korea.

BACKGROUND: Lutetium (Lu)-177 peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is one of the standard treatments for somatostatin receptor-positive well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). However, limited Asian representation in the pivotal NETTER-1 trial and a lack of real-world data for Lu-177 PRRT from Asian regions exist. OBJECTIVE: This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Lu-177 PRRT in Korean patients with advanced NETs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study analyzed 64 patients treated with Lu-177 DOTATATE PRRT at the Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, between November 2019 and December 2022. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety profile. RESULTS: The median age of patients was 55 years. Prior to PRRT, patients received a median of two lines (range 0-6) of systemic therapy. Fifty (78%) patients received the planned four cycles of Lu-177 DOTATATE PRRT. The median PFS was 21.7 months (95% confidence interval 16.7-not available) and the ORR was 20%. With a median follow-up of 15.7 months (range 1.0-39.3), the median OS was not reached and the 1-year OS rate was 88%. The median PFS was better in patients with grade 1-2 NETs than in those with grade 3 NET (not reached vs. 14.2 months; hazard ratio 3.15; p = 0.0058). Hematological toxicities were the common adverse events, including grade ≥ 3 anemia (7.8%), neutropenia (10.9%), and thrombocytopenia (9.4%). CONCLUSIONS: In Korean patients with advanced NETs, Lu-177 DOTATATE PRRT showed efficacy and safety outcomes, consistent with those in the NETTER-1 trial and previous Western real-world studies.

A radiomic- and dosiomic-based machine learning regression model for pretreatment planning in 177 Lu-DOTATATE therapy.

BACKGROUND: Standardized patient-specific pretreatment dosimetry planning is mandatory in the modern era of nuclear molecular radiotherapy, which may eventually lead to improvements in the final therapeutic outcome. Only a comprehensive definition of a dosage therapeutic window encompassing the range of absorbed doses, that is, helpful without being detrimental can lead to therapy individualization and improved outcomes. As a result, setting absorbed dose safety limits for organs at risk (OARs) requires knowledge of the absorbed dose-effect relationship. Data sets of consistent and reliable inter-center dosimetry findings are required to characterize this relationship. PURPOSE: We developed and standardized a new pretreatment planning model consisting of a predictive dosimetry procedure for OARs in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) treated with 177 Lu-DOTATATE (Lutathera). In the retrospective study described herein, we used machine learning (ML) regression algorithms to predict absorbed doses in OARs by exploiting a combination of radiomic and dosiomic features extracted from patients' imaging data. METHODS: Pretreatment and posttreatment data for 20 patients with NETs treated with 177 Lu-DOTATATE were collected from two clinical centers. A total of 3412 radiomic and dosiomic features were extracted from the patients' computed tomography (CT) scans and dose maps, respectively. All dose maps were generated using Monte Carlo simulations. An ML regression model was designed based on ML algorithms for predicting the absorbed dose in every OAR (liver, left kidney, right kidney, and spleen) before and after the therapy and between each therapy session, thus predicting any possible radiotoxic effects. RESULTS: We evaluated nine ML regression algorithms. Our predictive model achieved a mean absolute dose error (MAE, in Gy) of 0.61 for the liver, 1.58 for the spleen, 1.30 for the left kidney, and 1.35 for the right kidney between pretherapy 68 Ga-DOTATOC positron emission tomography (PET)/CT and posttherapy 177 Lu-DOTATATE single photon emission (SPECT)/CT scans. Τhe best predictive performance observed was based on the gradient boost for the liver, the left kidney and the right kidney, and on the extra tree regressor for the spleen. Evaluation of the model's performance according to its ability to predict the absorbed dose in each OAR in every possible combination of pretherapy 68 Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT and any posttherapy 177 Lu-DOTATATE treatment cycle SPECT/CT scans as well as any 177 Lu-DOTATATE SPECT/CT treatment cycle and the consequent 177 Lu-DOTATATE SPECT/CT treatment cycle revealed mean absorbed dose differences ranges from -0.55 to 0.68 Gy. Incorporating radiodosiomics features from the 68 Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT and first 177 Lu-DOTATATE SPECT/CT treatment cycle scans further improved the precision and minimized the standard deviation of the predictions in nine out of 12 instances. An average improvement of 57.34% was observed (range: 17.53%-96.12%). However, it's important to note that in three instances (i.e., Ga,C.1 â†’ C3 in spleen and left kidney, and Ga,C.1 â†’ C2 in right kidney) we did not observe an improvement (absolute differences of 0.17, 0.08, and 0.05 Gy, respectively). Wavelet-based features proved to have high correlated predictive value, whereas non-linear-based ML regression algorithms proved to be more capable than the linear-based of producing precise prediction in our case. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of radiomics and dosiomics has potential utility for personalized molecular radiotherapy (PMR) response evaluation and OAR dose prediction. These radiodosiomic features can potentially provide information on any possible disease recurrence and may be highly useful in clinical decision-making, especially regarding dose escalation issues.

A phase I/II study of the safety and efficacy of [177Lu]Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan in advanced somatostatin receptor-positive neuroendocrine tumours.

PURPOSE: We present the results of an open-label, phase I/II study evaluating the safety and efficacy of the novel somatostatin receptor (SSTR) antagonist [177Lu]Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan in 40 patients with previously treated, progressive neuroendocrine tumours (NETs), in which dosimetry was used to guide maximum administered activity. METHODS: This study was conducted in two parts. Part A consisted of 15 patients who completed three cycles of [177Lu]Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan at a fixed administered activity and peptide amount per cycle (4.5 GBq/300 µg). Part B, which included 25 patients who received one to five cycles of [177Lu]Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan, evaluated different administered activities (4.5 or 6.0 GBq/cycle) and peptide amounts (300, 700, or 1300 µg/cycle), limited to a cumulative absorbed radiation dose of 23 Gy to the kidneys and 1.5 Gy to the bone marrow. RESULTS: Median cumulative administered activity of [177Lu]Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan was 13.0 GBq over three cycles (13.1 GBq in part A and 12.9 GBq in part B). Overall, 17 (42.5%) patients experienced grade ≥ 3 treatment­related adverse events; the most common were lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia. No grade 3/4 nephrotoxicity was observed. Two patients developed myeloid neoplasms considered treatment related by the investigator. Disease control rate for part A and part B was 94.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 82.3-99.4), and overall response rate was 21.1% (95% CI: 9.6-37.3). CONCLUSION: [177Lu]Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan, administered at a median cumulative activity of 13.0 GBq over three cycles, has an acceptable safety profile with a promising clinical response in patients with progressive, SSTR-positive NETs. A 5-year long-term follow-up study is ongoing. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02592707. Registered October 30, 2015.

Impact of Single-Time-Point Estimates of 177Lu-PRRT Absorbed Doses on Patient Management: Validation of a Trained Multiple-Linear-Regression Model in 159 Patients and 477 Therapy Cycles.

Dosimetry after 177Lu-DOTATATE peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) enables estimation of radiation doses absorbed by normal organs and target lesions. This process is time-consuming and requires multiple posttreatment studies on several subsequent days. In a previous study, we described a newly developed multiple-linear-regression model to predict absorbed doses (ADs) from a single-time-point (STP) posttreatment study acquired 168 h after the first infusion and 24 h after the following ones, with similar results to the standard multiple-time-point (MTP) protocol. The present study aimed to validate this model in a large patient cohort and to assess whether STP dosimetry affects patient management decisions compared with our MTP protocol. Methods: Quantitative 177Lu-DOTATATE SPECT/CT post-PRRT data from 159 consecutive patients (172 therapies, 477 therapy cycles) were retrospectively analyzed. ADs obtained from an STP model were compared with those obtained using an MTP model. We evaluated the impact of the STP model on the decision on whether PRRT should be stopped because of an expected kidney AD exceeding the safety threshold. We hypothesized that patient management based on the STP model does not differ from that based on the MTP model in at least 90% of the cases. Results: There was no difference in management decisions between the MTP and STP models in 170 of 172 therapies (98.8%). A Fisher χ2 test for combined probabilities produced a composite P value of 0.0003. Mean cumulative AD relative differences between the STP and MTP models were 0.8% ± 8.0%, -7.7% ± 4.8%, 0.0% ± 11.4%, -2.8% ± 6.3%, and -2.1% ± 18.4% for kidneys, bone marrow, liver, spleen, and tumors, respectively (Pearson r = 0.99 for all), for patients who underwent 4 therapy cycles. Similar results were obtained with fewer therapy cycles. Conclusion: Estimated radiation ADs and patient management decisions were similar with the STP and MTP models. The STP model can simplify the dosimetry process while also reducing scanner and staff time and improving patient comfort.

Specific Uptake in the Bone Marrow Causes High Absorbed Red Marrow Doses During [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE Treatment.

Bone marrow suppression is a common side effect after [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE treatment of neuroendocrine neoplasms. Neuroendocrine neoplasms share expression of somatostatin receptor type 2 with CD34-positive hematopoietic progenitor cells, potentially leading to active uptake in the radiosensitive red marrow region where these cells are located. This study aimed to identify and quantify specific red marrow uptake using SPECT/CT images collected after the first treatment cycle. Methods: Seventeen patients diagnosed with neuroendocrine neoplasms were treated with [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE. Seven of them had confirmed bone metastases. After the first treatment cycle, each patient went through 4 SPECT/CT imaging sessions 4, 24, 48, and 168 h after administration. Monte Carlo-based reconstructions were used to quantify activity concentrations in tumors and multiple skeletal sites presumed to house red marrow: the T9-L5 vertebrae and the ilium portion of the hip bones. The activity concentration from the descending aorta was used as input in a compartment model intended to establish a pure red marrow biodistribution by separating the nonspecific blood-based contribution from the specific activity concentration in red marrow. The biodistributions from the compartment model were used to perform red marrow dosimetry at each skeletal site. Results: Increased uptake of [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE was observed in the T9-L5 vertebrae and hip bones in all 17 patients compared with activity concentrations in the aorta. The mean specific red marrow uptake was 49% (range, 0%-93%) higher than the nonspecific uptake. The median (±SD) total absorbed dose to the red marrow was 0.056 ± 0.023 Gy/GBq and 0.043 ± 0.022 Gy/GBq for the mean of all vertebrae and hip bones, respectively. The patients with bone metastases had an absorbed dose of 0.085 ± 0.046 Gy/GBq and 0.069 ± 0.033 Gy/GBq for the vertebrae and hip bones, respectively. The red marrow elimination phase was statistically slower in patients with fast tumor elimination, which is in line with transferrin transport of 177Lu back to the red marrow. Conclusion: Our results suggest that specific red marrow uptake of [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE is in line with observations of somatostatin receptor type 2-expressing hematopoietic progenitor cells within the bone marrow. Blood-based dosimetry methods fail to account for the prolonged elimination of specific uptake and underestimate the absorbed dose to red marrow.