Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 772
Filtrar
1.
J Biophotonics ; 17(10): e202400261, 2024 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39209319

RESUMEN

Photobiomodulation (PBM) has emerged as a potentially effective therapeutic approach to modulate cellular functions. This study aimed to examine the impact of PBM on reactive oxygen species (ROS), lipid peroxidation, and glutathione-related antioxidant defense systems in rabbit eye tissues. A polychromatic light source with an intensity of 2.6 J/cm2/min was used for PBM treatment in New Zealand White rabbits for 12 min. The PBM group (n = 8) received treatments every 2 days for a total of 12 sessions, whereas the control group (n = 8) did not undergo any PBM light exposure during the same period. The application of PBM significantly elevated ROS-mediated glutathione levels, along with increased activities of glutathione peroxidase and reductase, particularly in corneal tissue (p ≤ 0.05). In conclusion, PBM treatment effectively enhances antioxidant defense mechanisms in the eye, particularly in corneal tissue, suggesting its potential as a therapeutic strategy for managing oxidative stress-related ocular conditions.


Asunto(s)
Antioxidantes , Glutatión , Terapia por Luz de Baja Intensidad , Especies Reactivas de Oxígeno , Animales , Conejos , Glutatión/metabolismo , Antioxidantes/metabolismo , Especies Reactivas de Oxígeno/metabolismo , Ojo/metabolismo , Ojo/efectos de la radiación , Córnea/efectos de la radiación , Córnea/metabolismo , Peroxidación de Lípido/efectos de la radiación , Estrés Oxidativo/efectos de la radiación , Glutatión Peroxidasa/metabolismo , Glutatión Reductasa/metabolismo , Masculino
2.
Int J Radiat Biol ; 100(10): 1462-1470, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39058379

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Special properties and recent advances in the synthesis and biomolecular functionalization of gold nanoparticles (GNPs) have led to the evolution of their use in biomedical applications such as photon radiotherapy. Simulation-based studies on the effect of various parameters that govern the dose enhancement due to utilizing GNPs have facilitated the progress of knowledge in this field. Due to their flexibility and easier accessibility compared with experimental works, simulations have the potential to be considered for pre-clinical tests and, therefore, should be close to the realistic conditions as much as possible. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To this aim, the present work investigates the effect of the presence of GNPs that are accumulated in the cytoplasm of the constituent cells in healthy tissues of a human eye phantom, inspired by the published experimental results which report that non-target tissues also receive the drugs containing GNPs. The GNPs' concentrations are assumed to decrease by moving from the tumor toward the depth of the phantom through a suggested pattern. The MCNPX Monte Carlo code is used for the simulations. RESULTS: The results show that for four concentrations tested, the dose enhancement factor in the shallower layer reaches 6, and decreases to 1.2 in the last layer. The dose enhancements are also examined for critical structures of the iris, cornea, sclera, and lens, showing maximum deviations of about 3 to 200% compared with the absence of GNPs in the healthy tissue. Considering the reported doses to the lens by clinical institutions, the effect of penetration of GNPs to deep layers on treatment time is also investigated. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that the penetration of GNPs from the tumor toward healthy tissues strongly controls the dose enhancement over the various eye structures and emphasizes the importance of modeling the GNPs' distribution in the medium on the overall dose enhancement. Considering the current challenges in the clinical use of GNPs, more effort needs to be made to reach an effective endpoint in treatment.


Asunto(s)
Braquiterapia , Citoplasma , Ojo , Oro , Nanopartículas del Metal , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Oro/química , Nanopartículas del Metal/química , Humanos , Braquiterapia/métodos , Ojo/efectos de la radiación , Ojo/metabolismo , Citoplasma/metabolismo , Método de Montecarlo , Simulación por Computador , Modelos Biológicos
3.
J Radiol Prot ; 44(2)2024 May 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38701771

RESUMEN

Given the new recommendations for occupational eye lens doses, various lead glasses have been used to reduce irradiation of interventional radiologists. However, the protection afforded by lead glasses over prescription glasses (thus over-glasses-type eyewear) has not been considered in detail. We used a phantom to compare the protective effects of such eyewear and regular eyewear of 0.07 mm lead-equivalent thickness. The shielding rates behind the eyewear and on the surface of the left eye of an anthropomorphic phantom were calculated. The left eye of the phantom was irradiated at various angles and the shielding effects were evaluated. We measured the radiation dose to the left side of the phantom using RPLDs attached to the left eye and to the surface/back of the left eyewear. Over-glasses-type eyewear afforded good protection against x-rays from the left and below; the average shielding rates on the surface of the left eye ranged from 0.70-0.72. In clinical settings, scattered radiation is incident on physicians' eyes from the left and below, and through any gap in lead glasses. Over-glasses-type eyewear afforded better protection than regular eyewear of the same lead-equivalent thickness at the irradiation angles of concern in clinical settings. Although clinical evaluation is needed, we suggest over-glasses-type Pb eyewear even for physicians who do not wear prescription glasses.


Asunto(s)
Dispositivos de Protección de los Ojos , Anteojos , Exposición Profesional , Dosis de Radiación , Protección Radiológica , Humanos , Exposición Profesional/prevención & control , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Fantasmas de Imagen , Ojo/efectos de la radiación , Traumatismos por Radiación/prevención & control
4.
Health Phys ; 125(5): 338-351, 2023 11 01.
Artículo en Inglés, Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37584567

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT: A quantitative assessment of the blue light hazard for the human eye related to direct solar irradiation is presented. For six radiation situations, missing eye protection was compared to protection by nine different commercial sunglasses with and without an optimized blue light filter. Measurements of the solar irradiance were performed on Earth's surface as well as at an elevation of 12 km in the cockpit of an airliner. An irradiation time limit was calculated from the measurement data, within which the maximum blue light dose of 100 J m -2 , recommended by the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection and mandatory for the safe operation of lamps according to the norm ICE 62471, is reached. The results suggest that the blue light dose limit is violated within less than 3 s when looking without eye protection directly into the sun. For Category 3 sunglasses without the optimized blue light filter, time limits of 10 to 25 s on Earth's surface and 7 to 8 s at 12 km altitude were observed. The investigated Category 3 sunglasses with optimized blue light protection and suited for traffic use allow a time limit of more than 40 s on Earth's surface and 18 to 95 s in the airliner's cockpit. The outcome of the study is that the eye protection against blue light hazard related to solar radiation can be quantified using existing limits and that the choice of sunglasses is relevant: Traffic-worthy sunglasses optimized for protection against blue light hazard offer a better protection than non-optimized sunglasses.


Asunto(s)
Luz , Rayos Ultravioleta , Humanos , Luz Solar/efectos adversos , Ojo/efectos de la radiación , Dispositivos de Protección de los Ojos
5.
Med Phys ; 50(10): 6589-6599, 2023 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37278345

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Ocular melanoma is a rare kind of eye malignancy that threatens the patient's eyesight. Radiotherapy and surgical removal are the most commonly used therapeutic modalities, and nanomedicine has lately entered this field. Brachytherapy using Ruthenium-106 (106 Ru) ophthalmic plaques has been used for decades to treat ocular melanoma, with the applicator placed on the patient's eyes until the prescribed dose reaches the tumor apex. PURPOSE: To investigate the efficiency of hydrogen nanobubbles (H2 -NBs) employment during intraocular melanoma brachytherapy using a 106 Ru electron emitter plaque. METHODS: The Monte Carlo (MC) simulation and experimental investigation using a 3D-designed phantom and thermoluminescence dosimetry (TLD) were employed. Various concentrations of H2 -NBs with a diameter of 100 nm were simulated inside tumor tissue. The results were presented as deposited energy and dose enhancement factor (DEF). An equivalent Resin phantom of the human eyeball was made using AutoCAD and 3D-Printer technologies. The glass-bead TLDs dosimeter were employed and placed inside the phantom. RESULTS: Using a 1% concentration of H2 -NBs, a DEF of 93% and 98% were achieved at the tumor apex of 10 mm from the experimental setup and MC simulation, respectively. For simulated concentrations of 0.1%, 0.3%, 0.5%, 1%, and 4% H2 -NBs, a maximum dose enhancement of 154%, 174%, 188%, 200%, and 300% were achieved, respectively, and a dose reduction was seen at about 3 mm from the plaque surface. CONCLUSION: H2 -NBs can be used as an absorbed dose enhancer in 106 Ru eye brachytherapy because of their unique physical characteristics. Reducing plaque implantation time on the patient's eye, reducing sclera absorbed dose, and decreasing the risk of patients' healthy organs irradiation are reported as some of the potential benefits of using H2-NBs.


Asunto(s)
Braquiterapia , Neoplasias del Ojo , Melanoma , Neoplasias de la Úvea , Humanos , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Ojo/efectos de la radiación , Neoplasias del Ojo/radioterapia , Braquiterapia/métodos , Melanoma/radioterapia , Método de Montecarlo
6.
Cont Lens Anterior Eye ; 45(6): 101593, 2022 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35431131

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To examine the effects of long-term ultraviolet radiation (UVR) blocking wearing contact lenses on ocular surface health, eye focus and macular pigment. METHOD: 210 pre-presbyopic patients were recruited from Birmingham UK, Brisbane Australia, Hong Kong China, Houston USA and Waterloo Canada (n = 42 at each site). All patients had worn contact lenses for ≥ 5 years, half (test group) of a material incorporating a UVR-blocking filter. Ocular health was assessed using slit-lamp biomicroscopy and UV autofluorescence. Accommodation was measured subjectively with a push-up test and overcoming lens-induced defocus. Objective stimulus response and dynamic measures of the accommodative response were quantified with an open-field aberrometer. Macular pigment optical density (MPOD) was assessed using heterochromatic flicker photometry (MPS II). RESULTS: The two groups of participants were matched for age, sex, race, body-mass-index, diet, lifestyle, UVR exposure, refractive error and visual acuity. Limbal (p = 0.035), but not bulbar conjunctival redness (p = 0.903) was lower in eyes that had worn UVR-blocking contact lenses compared to controls. The subjective (8.0 ± 3.7D vs 7.3 ± 3.3D; p = 0.125) and objective (F = 1.255, p = 0.285) accommodative response was higher in the test group, but the differences did not reach significance. However, the accommodative latency was shorter in eyes that had worn UVR-blocking contact lenses (p = 0.003). There was no significant different in MPOD with UVR filtration (p = 0.869). CONCLUSIONS: Blocking the transmission of UVR is beneficial in maintaining the eye's ability to focus, suggesting that presbyopia maybe delayed in long-term UVR-blocking contact lenses wearers. These lenses also provide protection to the critical limbal region.


Asunto(s)
Lentes de Contacto , Pigmento Macular , Protección Radiológica , Humanos , Rayos Ultravioleta , Ojo/efectos de la radiación
7.
Probl Radiac Med Radiobiol ; 26: 57-97, 2021 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés, Ucraniano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34965543

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Ionizing radiation (IR) can affect the brain and the visual organ even at low doses, while provoking cognitive, emotional, behavioral, and visual disorders. We proposed to consider the brain and the visual organ as potential targets for the influence of IR with the definition of cerebro-ophthalmic relationships as the «eye-brain axis¼. OBJECTIVE: The present work is a narrative review of current experimental, epidemiological and clinical data on radiation cerebro-ophthalmic effects in children, individuals exposed in utero, astronauts and interventional radiologists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines by searching the abstract and scientometric databases PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, PsycINFO, Google Scholar, published from 1998 to 2021, as well as the results of manual search of peer-reviewed publications. RESULTS: Epidemiological data on the effects of low doses of IR on neurodevelopment are quite contradictory, while data on clinical, neuropsychological and neurophysiological on cognitive and cerebral disorders, especially in the left, dominant hemisphere of the brain, are nore consistent. Cataracts (congenital - after in utero irradiation) and retinal angiopathy are more common in prenatally-exposed people and children. Astronauts, who carry out longterm space missions outside the protection of the Earth's magnetosphere, will be exposed to galactic cosmic radiation (heavy ions, protons), which leads to cerebro-ophthalmic disorders, primarily cognitive and behavioral disorders and cataracts. Interventional radiologists are a special risk group for cerebro-ophthalmic pathology - cognitivedeficits, mainly due to dysfunction of the dominant and more radiosensitive left hemisphere of the brain, andcataracts, as well as early atherosclerosis and accelerated aging. CONCLUSIONS: Results of current studies indicate the high radiosensitivity of the brain and eye in different contingents of irradiated persons. Further research is needed to clarify the nature of cerebro-ophthalmic disorders in different exposure scenarios, to determine the molecular biological mechanisms of these disorders, reliable dosimetric support and taking into account the influence of non-radiation risk factors.


Asunto(s)
Encéfalo/efectos de la radiación , Radiación Cósmica/efectos adversos , Ojo/efectos de la radiación , Efectos Tardíos de la Exposición Prenatal , Traumatismos por Radiación/etiología , Radiación Ionizante , Vuelo Espacial , Adolescente , Adulto , Astronautas/estadística & datos numéricos , Niño , Preescolar , Ojo/fisiopatología , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Embarazo , Dosis de Radiación , Traumatismos por Radiación/fisiopatología , Radiólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
8.
Strahlenther Onkol ; 197(8): 700-710, 2021 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34100093

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The aim of the study is to evaluate treatment-related acute and late eye toxicity associated with radiation therapy in childhood and adolescence as correlated with RT (radiotherapy) doses. METHODS: From 2001 to 2016, a total of 1725 children and adolescents undergoing radiation therapy were prospectively documented in the Registry of the Evaluation of Side Effects after Radiotherapy in Childhood and Adolescence (RiSK). The RTOG/EORTC criteria were used to classify ocular acute and late effects. Uni- and multivariate analyses were carried out to evaluate the impact of patient age, pre-existing impairments, and radiation dose on ocular toxicity. RESULTS: Of all documented patients, 593 received dose to the eye and formed the basis of this analysis. In 435 patients, information on acute reaction was available and graded 1, 2, 3, and 4 in 49, 17, 0, and 2 patients, respectively. Information on late toxicity was available in 268 patients and graded 1, 2, 3, and 4 in 15, 11, 11, and 5 patients, respectively. The acute toxicity rate was significantly higher in children who received a maximum dose > 50 Gy to the eye (p < 0.001) and who had a pre-existing eye impairment (p < 0.001 in multivariate analysis). The development of late toxicity was significantly higher for patients experiencing acute toxicity and having received a radiation dose > 50 Gy. CONCLUSION: Acute and late toxicity both correlate with high radiation dose to the eye (> 50 Gy) and acute toxicity additionally with pre-existing eye impairments.


Asunto(s)
Lesiones Oculares/etiología , Ojo/efectos de la radiación , Traumatismos por Radiación/etiología , Radioterapia/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Preescolar , Ojo/patología , Lesiones Oculares/diagnóstico , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Traumatismos por Radiación/diagnóstico , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Sistema de Registros , Adulto Joven
9.
Photochem Photobiol Sci ; 20(5): 677-685, 2021 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34009633

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Long-term ultraviolet A (UVA) eye irradiation decreases memory and learning ability in mice. However, the underlying mechanism is still unclear. OBJECTIVES: In this study, ICR mice were used to study the effects of long-term UVA eye irradiation. METHODS: The eyes of mice were exposed to UVA from an FL20SBLB-A lamp three times a week for 1 year. Then, we analyzed memory and learning ability in the mice using water maze and step-through passive avoidance tests, and measured the levels of p53, Period2 (Per2), Clock, brain and muscle Arnt-like protein-1 (Bmal1), nicotinamide mononucleotide adenylyltransferase (NMNAT) activity, nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase (NAMPT) activity, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+), and sirtuin 1 (Sirt1) in the brains of treated and control animals. RESULTS: The results showed that the p53 level increased significantly following long-term UVA eye irradiation, whereas the levels of Period2, Bmal1, Clock, NMNAT and NAMPT activities, NAD+, and Sirt1 decreased significantly. Furthermore, we found that p53 inhibition ameliorated the UVA eye irradiation-induced depression of memory and learning ability. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that long-term UVA eye irradiation stimulates p53, inhibits the clock gene, and reduces Sirt1 production in the NAD+ constructional system, resulting in reduced memory and learning ability.


Asunto(s)
Ojo/metabolismo , Discapacidades para el Aprendizaje/metabolismo , Trastornos de la Memoria/metabolismo , Proteína p53 Supresora de Tumor/metabolismo , Rayos Ultravioleta , Animales , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Ojo/efectos de la radiación , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos ICR
10.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 7586, 2021 04 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33828194

RESUMEN

Myopia results from an excessive axial growth of the eye, causing abnormal projection of remote images in front of the retina. Without adequate interventions, myopia is forecasted to affect 50% of the world population by 2050. Exposure to outdoor light plays a critical role in preventing myopia in children, possibly through the brightness and blue-shifted spectral composition of sunlight, which lacks in artificial indoor lighting. Here, we evaluated the impact of moderate levels of ambient standard white (SW: 233.1 lux, 3900 K) and blue-enriched white (BEW: 223.8 lux, 9700 K) lights on ocular growth and metabolomics in a chicken-model of form-deprivation myopia. Compared to SW light, BEW light decreased aberrant ocular axial elongation and accelerated recovery from form-deprivation. Furthermore, the metabolomic profiles in the vitreous and retinas of recovering form-deprived eyes were distinct from control eyes and were dependent on the spectral content of ambient light. For instance, exposure to BEW light was associated with deep lipid remodeling and metabolic changes related to energy production, cell proliferation, collagen turnover and nitric oxide metabolism. This study provides new insight on light-dependent modulations in ocular growth and metabolomics. If replicable in humans, our findings open new potential avenues for spectrally-tailored light-therapy strategies for myopia.


Asunto(s)
Miopía/prevención & control , Retina/efectos de la radiación , Cuerpo Vítreo/metabolismo , Animales , Longitud Axial del Ojo/crecimiento & desarrollo , Pollos , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Ojo/crecimiento & desarrollo , Ojo/efectos de la radiación , Hiperopía/fisiopatología , Luz , Iluminación/métodos , Metabolómica , Miopía/metabolismo , Miopía/radioterapia , Fototerapia/métodos , Refracción Ocular , Retina/patología , Luz Solar , Visión Ocular , Cuerpo Vítreo/patología
12.
Probl Radiac Med Radiobiol ; 25: 90-129, 2020 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés, Ucraniano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33361831

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Exposure to ionizing radiation could affect the brain and eyes leading to cognitive and vision impairment, behavior disorders and performance decrement during professional irradiation at medical radiology, includinginterventional radiological procedures, long-term space flights, and radiation accidents. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to analyze the current experimental, epidemiological, and clinical data on the radiation cerebro-ophthalmic effects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In our analytical review peer-reviewed publications via the bibliographic and scientometric bases PubMed / MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and selected papers from the library catalog of NRCRM - theleading institution in the field of studying the medical effects of ionizing radiation - were used. RESULTS: The probable radiation-induced cerebro-ophthalmic effects in human adults comprise radiation cataracts,radiation glaucoma, radiation-induced optic neuropathy, retinopathies, angiopathies as well as specific neurocognitive deficit in the various neuropsychiatric pathology including cerebrovascular pathology and neurodegenerativediseases. Specific attention is paid to the likely stochastic nature of many of those effects. Those prenatally and inchildhood exposed are a particular target group with a higher risk for possible radiation effects and neurodegenerative diseases. CONCLUSIONS: The experimental, clinical, epidemiological, anatomical and pathophysiological rationale for visualsystem and central nervous system (CNS) radiosensitivity is given. The necessity for further international studieswith adequate dosimetric support and the follow-up medical and biophysical monitoring of high radiation riskcohorts is justified. The first part of the study currently being published presents the results of the study of theeffects of irradiation in the participants of emergency works at the Chornobyl Nuclear Power Plant (ChNPP).


Asunto(s)
Lesiones Encefálicas/patología , Encéfalo/efectos de la radiación , Accidente Nuclear de Chernóbil , Socorristas , Lesiones Oculares/patología , Ojo/efectos de la radiación , Traumatismos por Radiación/patología , Encéfalo/patología , Lesiones Encefálicas/epidemiología , Lesiones Encefálicas/etiología , Relación Dosis-Respuesta en la Radiación , Ojo/patología , Lesiones Oculares/epidemiología , Lesiones Oculares/etiología , Humanos , Dosis de Radiación , Exposición a la Radiación/efectos adversos , Traumatismos por Radiación/epidemiología , Traumatismos por Radiación/etiología , Radiación Ionizante , Factores de Tiempo , Ucrania/epidemiología
13.
Anticancer Res ; 40(11): 6123-6135, 2020 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33109550

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/AIM: The importance of hadron therapy in the cancer management is growing. We aimed to refine the biological effect detection using a vertebrate model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Embryos at 24 and 72 h postfertilization were irradiated at the entrance plateau and the mid spread-out Bragg peak of a 150 MeV proton beam and with reference photons. Radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) and histopathological changes of the eye, muscles and brain were evaluated; deterioration of specific organs (eye, yolk sac, body) was measured. RESULTS: More and longer-lasting DSBs occurred in eye and muscle cells due to proton versus photon beams, albeit in different numbers. Edema, necrosis and tissue disorganization, (especially in the eye) were observed. Dose-dependent morphological deteriorations were detected at ≥10 Gy dose levels, with relative biological effectiveness between 0.99±0.07 (length) and 1.12±0.19 (eye). CONCLUSION: Quantitative assessment of radiation induced changes in zebrafish embryos proved to be beneficial for the radiobiological characterization of proton beams.


Asunto(s)
Fotones , Protones , Pez Cebra/fisiología , Animales , Encéfalo/efectos de la radiación , Daño del ADN , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Relación Dosis-Respuesta en la Radiación , Embrión no Mamífero/efectos de la radiación , Ojo/patología , Ojo/efectos de la radiación , Cinética , Tamaño de los Órganos/efectos de la radiación , Efectividad Biológica Relativa , Saco Vitelino/patología , Saco Vitelino/efectos de la radiación , Pez Cebra/embriología
14.
Biomed Pharmacother ; 130: 110577, 2020 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32763817

RESUMEN

The risk of blue light exposure to human health has attracted increased research attention. Blue light, with relatively high energy, can cause irreversible photochemical damage to eye tissue. Excessive exposure of the eye to blue light tends to cause a series of alterations, such as oxidative stress, mitochondrial apoptosis, inflammatory apoptosis, mitochondrial apoptosis and DNA damage, resulting in the development of dry eye disease, glaucoma, and keratitis. Accordingly, physical protection, chemical and pharmaceutical protective measures, gene therapy, and other methods are widely used in the clinical treatment of blue light hazard. We reviewed the studies on possible blue light-induced signaling pathways and mechanisms in the eye and summarized the therapeutic approaches to addressing blue light hazard.


Asunto(s)
Ojo/efectos de la radiación , Luz/efectos adversos , Animales , Oftalmopatías/prevención & control , Humanos
15.
Pediatr Blood Cancer ; 67(10): e28625, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32743978

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Bilateral retinoblastoma (Rb) treatment remains a challenge for ophthalmologists and pediatric oncologists despite new therapeutic strategies for eye preservation. The purpose of this work is to evaluate treatment outcomes in patients who underwent eye salvage treatment at a single-center prior to the chemotherapy in situ era. PROCEDURE: We followed a cohort of 88 consecutive Rb patients diagnosed at Hospital Infantil de México between November 2000 and June 2014. Eye salvage treatment consisted of systemic chemotherapy plus focal therapy planned by a multidisciplinary team. Unresponsive tumors were treated with episcleral brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). RESULTS: A total of 96 eyes underwent eye salvaging therapy. Seventy-eight eyes (81%) were salvaged. Seven patients (8%) required brachytherapy and 34 patients (39%) underwent EBRT. Thirty-three of 78 preserved eyes (42%) achieved normal visual acuity: 5/27 (20%) in radiated patients and 28/51 (61%) in nonradiated patients. Eight patients developed secondary primary malignancies; however, those treated with EBRT did not have a significantly increased risk when compared with nonirradiated patients (OR: 1.66; P = 0.492). The overall survival rate was 86% (95% CI, 76%-92%) after a mean follow-up of 10 years. CONCLUSIONS: Eye preservation, long-term tumor control, and functional visual acuity could be maintained in many child and adolescent Rb survivors. Our data suggest that ocular radiotherapy can be used as consolidation treatment when other recently developed therapies with potentially fewer side effects are not available. Multidisciplinary management of Rb is mandatory to obtain cancer control during eye salvage treatment.


Asunto(s)
Ojo/efectos de los fármacos , Ojo/efectos de la radiación , Neoplasias Orbitales/terapia , Tratamientos Conservadores del Órgano/métodos , Neoplasias de la Retina/terapia , Retinoblastoma/terapia , Terapia Recuperativa , Quimioradioterapia/métodos , Preescolar , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , México , Neoplasias Orbitales/patología , Pronóstico , Neoplasias de la Retina/patología , Retinoblastoma/patología , Agudeza Visual
16.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; 8: CD004004, 2020 08 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32844399

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy has been proposed as a treatment for new vessel growth in people with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). OBJECTIVES: To examine the effects of radiotherapy on neovascular AMD. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS and three trials registers and checked references of included studies. We last searched the databases on 4 May 2020.  SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all randomised controlled trials in which radiotherapy was compared to another treatment, sham treatment, low dosage irradiation or no treatment in people with choroidal neovascularisation (CNV) secondary to AMD. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard procedures expected by Cochrane. We graded the certainty of the evidence using GRADE. We considered the following outcomes at 12 months: best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) (loss of 3 or more lines, change in visual acuity), contrast sensitivity, new vessel growth, quality of life and adverse effects at any time point.  MAIN RESULTS: We included 18 studies (n = 2430 people, 2432 eyes) of radiation therapy with dosages ranging from 7.5 to 24 Gy. These studies mainly took place in Europe and North America but two studies were from Japan and one multicentre study included sites in South America. Three of these studies investigated brachytherapy (plaque and epimacular), the rest were studies of external beam radiotherapy (EBM) including one trial of stereotactic radiotherapy. Four studies compared radiotherapy combined with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) with anti-VEGF alone. Eleven studies gave no radiotherapy treatment to the control group; five studies used sham irradiation; and one study used very low-dose irradiation (1 Gy). One study used a mixture of sham irradiation and no treatment. Fifteen studies were judged to be at high risk of bias in one or more domains. Radiotherapy versus no radiotherapy There may be little or no difference in loss of 3 lines of vision at 12 months in eyes treated with radiotherapy compared with no radiotherapy (risk ratio (RR) 0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.64 to 1.04, 811 eyes, 8 studies, I2 = 66%, low-certainty evidence). Low-certainty evidence suggests a small benefit in change in visual acuity (mean difference (MD) -0.10 logMAR, 95% CI -0.17 to -0.03; eyes = 883; studies = 10) and average contrast sensitivity at 12 months (MD 0.15 log units, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.25; eyes = 267; studies = 2). Growth of new vessels (largely change in CNV size) was variably reported and It was not possible to produce a summary estimate of this outcome. The studies were small with imprecise estimates and there was no consistent pattern to the study results (very low-certainty evidence). Quality of life was only reported in one study of 199 people; there was no clear difference between treatment and control groups (low-certainty evidence). Low-certainty evidence was available on adverse effects from eight of 14 studies. Seven studies reported on radiation retinopathy and/or neuropathy. Five of these studies reported no radiation-associated adverse effects. One study of 88 eyes reported one case of possible radiation retinopathy. One study of 74 eyes graded retinal abnormalities in some detail and found that 72% of participants who had radiation compared with 71% of participants in the control group had retinal abnormalities resembling radiation retinopathy or choroidopathy. Four studies reported cataract surgery or progression: events were generally few with no consistent evidence of any increased occurrence in the radiation group. One study noted transient disturbance of the precorneal tear film but there was no evidence from the other two studies that reported dry eye of any increased risk with radiation therapy. None of the participants received anti-VEGF injections. Radiotherapy combined with anti-VEGF versus anti-VEGF alone People receiving radiotherapy/anti-VEGF were probably more likely to lose 3 or more lines of BCVA at 12 months compared with anti-VEGF alone (RR 2.11, 95% CI 1.40 to 3.17, 1050 eyes, 3 studies, moderate-certainty). Most of the data for this outcome come from two studies of epimacular brachytherapy (114 events) compared with 20 events from the one trial of EBM. Data on change in BCVA were heterogenous (I2 = 82%). Individual study results ranged from a small difference of -0.03 logMAR in favour of radiotherapy/anti-VEGF to a difference of 0.13 logMAR in favour of anti-VEGF alone (low-certainty evidence). The effect differed depending on how the radiotherapy was delivered (test for interaction P = 0.0007). Epimacular brachytherapy was associated with worse visual outcomes (MD 0.10 logMAR, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.15, 820 eyes, 2 studies) compared with EBM (MD -0.03 logMAR, 95% CI -0.09 to 0.03, 252 eyes, 2 studies). None of the included studies reported contrast sensitivity or quality of life. Growth of new vessels (largely change in CNV size) was variably reported in three studies (803 eyes). It was not possible to produce a summary estimate and there was no consistent pattern to the study results (very low-certainty evidence). For adverse outcomes, variable results were reported in the four studies. In three studies reports of adverse events were low and no radiation-associated adverse events were reported. In one study of epimacular brachytherapy there was a higher proportion of ocular adverse events (54%) compared to the anti-VEGF alone (18%). The majority of these adverse events were cataract. Overall 5% of the treatment group had radiation device-related adverse events (17 cases); 10 of these cases were radiation retinopathy. There were differences in average number of injections given between the four studies (1072 eyes). In three of the four studies, the anti-VEGF alone group on average received more injections (moderate-certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The evidence is uncertain regarding the use of radiotherapy for neovascular AMD. Most studies took place before the routine use of anti-VEGF, and before the development of modern radiotherapy techniques such as stereotactic radiotherapy. Visual outcomes with epimacular brachytherapy are likely to be worse, with an increased risk of adverse events,  probably related to vitrectomy. The role of stereotactic radiotherapy combined with anti-VEGF is currently uncertain. Further research on radiotherapy for neovascular AMD may not be justified until current ongoing studies have reported their results.


Asunto(s)
Degeneración Macular/radioterapia , Sesgo , Braquiterapia/efectos adversos , Braquiterapia/métodos , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Ojo/efectos de la radiación , Humanos , Traumatismos por Radiación/complicaciones , Radioterapia/efectos adversos , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/antagonistas & inhibidores , Agudeza Visual/efectos de la radiación
17.
J Radiat Res ; 61(5): 691-696, 2020 Sep 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32657327

RESUMEN

Although the clinical value of fluoroscopically guided respiratory endoscopy (bronchoscopy) is clear, there have been very few studies on the radiation dose received by staff during fluoroscopically guided bronchoscopy. The International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) is suggesting reducing the occupational lens dose limit markedly from 150 to 20 mSv/year, averaged over defined periods of five years. The purpose of this study was to clarify the current occupational eye dose of bronchoscopy staff conducting fluoroscopically guided procedures. We measured the occupational eye doses (3-mm-dose equivalent, Hp(3)) of bronchoscopy staff (physicians and nurses) over a 6-month period. The eye doses of eight physicians and three nurses were recorded using a direct eye dosimeter, the DOSIRIS. We also estimated eye doses using personal dosimeters worn at the neck. The mean ± SD radiation eye doses (DOSIRIS) to physicians and nurses were 7.68 ± 5.27 and 2.41 ± 1.94 mSv/6 months, respectively. The new lens dose limit, 20 mSv/year, may be exceeded among bronchoscopy staff, especially physicians. The eye dose of bronchoscopy staff (both physicians and nurses) was underestimated when measured using a neck dosimeter. Hence, the occupational eye dose of bronchoscopy staff should be monitored. To reduce the occupational eye dose, we recommend that staff performing fluoroscopically guided bronchoscopy wear Pb glasses. correct evaluation of the lens dose [Hp(3)] using an eye dosimeter such as the DOSIRIS is necessary for bronchoscopy staff.


Asunto(s)
Broncoscopía , Ojo/efectos de la radiación , Fluoroscopía , Cuerpo Médico , Protección Radiológica , Relación Dosis-Respuesta en la Radiación , Humanos , Cuello/efectos de la radiación , Enfermeras y Enfermeros , Exposición Profesional , Médicos , Dosis de Radiación , Exposición a la Radiación , Radiometría , Rayos X
18.
Sci Rep ; 10(1): 11582, 2020 07 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32665663

RESUMEN

The use of organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs) has rapidly increased in recent years. However, the effect of OLEDs on human health has not been studied yet. We investigated morphologic and functional changes after OLEDs exposure of human ocular cells, including corneal, conjunctival, lens, and retinal pigment epithelial cells, and mouse eyes. In corneal and conjunctival epithelial cells, the levels of reactive oxygen species production and interleukin-8 expression after white light-emitting diodes (LED) exposure were significantly greater than those after OLED exposure. Although no gross morphologic changes of the eyelid or cornea were found in LED- or OLED-exposed mice, oxidative stress on ocular surface was significantly increased, and the outer nuclear layer (ONL) was significantly shorter in both light-treated groups than the control group. Moreover, ONL thickness was significantly lower in the LED group than the OLED group. The electroretinography response was significantly lower in light exposure group, and there was significant difference between LED- and OLED-treated mice. Although OLED exhibits certain ocular toxicity, it can be less toxic to eyes than LED. The higher blue-wavelength energy of LED light might be the reason for its higher toxicity relative to OLED.


Asunto(s)
Ojo/efectos de la radiación , Luz/efectos adversos , Estrés Oxidativo/efectos de la radiación , Retina/efectos de la radiación , Animales , Color , Conjuntiva/efectos de la radiación , Córnea/efectos de la radiación , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Células Epiteliales/efectos de la radiación , Humanos , Cristalino/efectos de la radiación , Ratones , Especies Reactivas de Oxígeno/metabolismo , Retina/patología , Epitelio Pigmentado de la Retina/efectos de la radiación , Neuropatía Óptica Tóxica
19.
Radiat Oncol ; 15(1): 156, 2020 Jun 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32571366

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment for lacrimal gland cancer remains unclear. Eye-preserving surgery, as opposed to exenteration, followed by adjuvant radiotherapy (RT), has recently been reported to deliver satisfactory outcomes, but evidence is sparse. The aim of the present study was to evaluate outcomes in patients with lacrimal gland cancer treated at two tertiary medical centers. METHODS: We retrospectively examined data from patients with lacrimal gland cancer who had received eye-preserving surgical treatment followed by adjuvant RT with or without chemotherapy, or (if the tumor was inoperable) needle biopsy with definitive RT with or without chemotherapy. Baseline clinical and pathological characteristics were considered. Outcomes of interest included post-treatment complications, overall survival (OS), locoregional progression-free survival (LPFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). RESULTS: Eighteen patients were included. Two-year OS, LPFS, and DMFS rates were 69.0, 76.7, and 71.4%, respectively. Patients with early-stage (T1-T2) lacrimal gland cancer had significantly better outcomes than those with advanced-stage disease (T3-T4). Two-year OS, LPFS, and DMFS rates were each 100% in patients with disease stages T1-T2, and 37.5, 50, and 37.5%, respectively, in those with disease stages T3-T4 (P < 0.05). Orbital complications were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Eye-sparing surgery with adjuvant RT can achieve satisfactory results in patients with T1-T2 lacrimal gland carcinoma. Disease stage T3 and above was associated with poor outcomes even with post-operative RT, likely due to distant metastasis. Adding neoadjuvant chemotherapy or adjuvant chemotherapy to current treatment strategies might be a suitable choice for this group of patients.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Ojo/radioterapia , Enfermedades del Aparato Lagrimal/radioterapia , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Terapia Combinada , Ojo/efectos de la radiación , Neoplasias del Ojo/mortalidad , Neoplasias del Ojo/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Enfermedades del Aparato Lagrimal/mortalidad , Enfermedades del Aparato Lagrimal/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Oftalmológicos/métodos , Traumatismos por Radiación/etiología , Radioterapia Adyuvante/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven
20.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging ; 36(8): 1417-1425, 2020 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32350705

RESUMEN

Considering the increased use of interventional cardiologic procedures and concern about irradiation to the eyes, it is necessary to measure eye dose in radiation workers. The assessment of eye dose using collar dose is a routine but inaccurate method. Therefore this study was designed to measure eye dose in the radiation workers of various interventional cardiologic procedures. In this study eye dose was measured for left and right eyes in three groups of radiation workers in angiography ward of Afshar hospital in various procedures using TLD. Measurements were done separately for cardiologists, nurses and radio-technologists in 100 procedures. The nurses functioned as surgical assistants and were usually close to the table. The correlation of staff dose to exposure parameters was also investigated. Eye dose in physicians were higher than other staff in all procedures. Also the left eye dose was considerably higher than right one, especially for physicians. The median equivalent dose per procedure of left eye for physicians, nurses and radio-technologists were 7.4, 3.6, 1.4 µSv (PCI) and 3.2, 3.1, 1.3 µSv (Adhoc) and 3.2, 1.7, 1.1 µSv (CA), respectively. The annual left eye equivalent dose with (without) using lead goggles were 2.4 (15.3), 1.4 (2.2), 1.0 (1.1) mSv for physicians, nurses and radio-technologists, respectively. There were also a positive correlation between eye dose and KAP for procedures without lead goggles. The lead goggles showed lower protection effects for radio-technologists than other staff. Only 30% of physicians received a dose higher than 1/3 of the ICRP annual dose limit, therefor only physician eye dose should be monitored in catheterization labs.


Asunto(s)
Cardiólogos , Dispositivos de Protección de los Ojos , Ojo/efectos de la radiación , Plomo , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital , Auxiliares de Cirugía , Dosis de Radiación , Exposición a la Radiación/prevención & control , Traumatismos por Radiación/prevención & control , Radiografía Intervencional , Radiólogos , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Perfil Laboral , Salud Laboral , Factores Protectores , Exposición a la Radiación/efectos adversos , Traumatismos por Radiación/etiología , Radiografía Intervencional/efectos adversos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Dosimetría Termoluminiscente
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA