Clinical decision support for severe trauma patients: Machine learning based definition of a bundle of care for hemorrhagic shock and traumatic brain injury.

BACKGROUND: Deviation from guidelines is frequent in emergency situations, and this may lead to increased mortality. Probably because of time constraints, 55% is the greatest reported guidelines compliance rate in severe trauma patients. This study aimed to identify among all available recommendations a reasonable bundle of items that should be followed to optimize the outcome of hemorrhagic shocks (HSs) and severe traumatic brain injuries (TBIs). METHODS: We first estimated the compliance with French and European guidelines using the data from the French TraumaBase registry. Then, we used a machine learning procedure to reduce the number of recommendations into a minimal set of items to be followed to minimize 7-day mortality. We evaluated the bundles using an external validation cohort. RESULTS: This study included 5,924 trauma patients (1,414 HS and 4,955 TBI) between 2011 and August 2019 and studied compliance to 36 recommendation items. Overall compliance rate to recommendation items was 71.6% and 66.9% for HS and TBI, respectively. In HS, compliance was significantly associated with 7-day decreased mortality in univariate analysis but not in multivariate analysis (risk ratio [RR], 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90-1.17; p = 0.06). In TBI, compliance was significantly associated with decreased mortality in univariate and multivariate analysis (RR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.75-0.92; p = 0.01). For HS, the bundle included 13 recommendation items. In the validation cohort, when this bundle was applied, patients were found to have a lower 7-day mortality rate (RR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.27-0.63; p = 0.01). In TBI, the bundle included seven items. In the validation cohort, when this bundle was applied, patients had a lower 7-day mortality rate (RR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.34-0.71; p = 0.02). DISCUSSION: Using a machine-learning procedure, we were able to identify a subset of recommendations that minimizes 7-day mortality following traumatic HS and TBI. These two bundles remain to be evaluated in a prospective manner. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Care Management, level II.

Dissecting the Perioperative Care Bundle.

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are comprehensive perioperative care pathways designed to mitigate the physiologic stressors associated with surgery and, in turn, improve clinical outcomes and lead to health care cost savings. Although individual components may differ, ERAS protocols are typically organized as multimodal care "bundles" that, when followed closely and in their entirety, are meant to generate amplified cumulative benefits. This manuscript examines some of the critical components, describes some areas where the science is weak (but dogma may be strong), and provides some of the evidence or lack thereof behind components of a standard ERAS protocol.

Rates of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia Following Implementation of a Novel Prevention Bundle.

Importance: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) rates in the United States remain high and have changed little in the last decade. Objective: To develop a consistent BPD prevention bundle in a systematic approach to decrease BPD. Design, Setting, and Participants: This quality improvement study included 484 infants with birth weights from 501 to 1500 g admitted to a level 3 neonatal intensive care unit in the Kaiser Permanente Southern California system from 2009 through 2019. The study period was divided into 3 periods: 1, baseline (2009); 2, initial changes based on ongoing cycles of Plan-Do-Study-Act (2010-2014); and 3, full implementation of successive Plan-Do-Study-Act results (2015-2019). Interventions: A BPD prevention system of care bundle evolved with a shared mental model that BPD is avoidable. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was BPD in infants with less than 33 weeks' gestational age (hereafter referred to as BPD <33). Other measures included adjusted BPD <33, BPD severity grade, and adjusted median postmenstrual age (PMA) at hospital discharge. Balancing measures were adjusted mortality and adjusted mortality or specified morbidities. Results: The study population included 484 infants with a mean (SD) birth weight of 1070 (277) g; a mean (SD) gestational age of 28.6 (2.9) weeks; 252 female infants (52.1%); and 61 Black infants (12.6%). During the 3 study periods, BPD <33 decreased from 9 of 29 patients (31.0%) to 3 of 184 patients (1.6%) (P < .001 for trend); special cause variation was observed. The standardized morbidity ratio for the adjusted BPD <33 decreased from 1.2 (95% CI, 0.7-1.9) in 2009 to 0.4 (95% CI, 0.2-0.8) in 2019. The rates of combined grades 1, 2, and 3 BPD decreased from 7 of 29 patients (24.1%) to 17 of 183 patients (9.3%) (P < .008 for trend). Grade 2 BPD rates decreased from 3 of 29 patients (10.3%) to 5 of 183 patients (2.7%) (P = .02 for trend). Adjusted median PMA at home discharge decreased by 2 weeks, from 38.2 (95% CI, 37.3-39.1) weeks in 2009 to 36.8 (95% CI, 36.6-37.1) weeks during the last 3 years (2017-2019) of the full implementation period. Adjusted mortality was unchanged, whereas adjusted mortality or specified morbidities decreased significantly. Conclusions and Relevance: A sustained low rate of BPD was observed in infants after the implementation of a detailed BPD system of care.

Implementing a Safety Bundle to Improve Screening and Care for Perinatal Mood and Anxiety Disorders.

OBJECTIVE: To improve screening and care of individuals with perinatal mood and anxiety disorders (PMAD) through the implementation of a perinatal mental health safety bundle. DESIGN: Rapid-cycle quality improvement model using four plan-do-study-act cycles over the course of 90 days. Individuals between 28 and 32 weeks gestation and at their 6-week postpartum follow-up visit were screened and offered stage-based care for PMAD. SETTING/LOCAL PROBLEM: At baseline, only 15% of clients of a suburban, private-practice women's health clinic were receiving PMAD screening with a validated tool, and the site lacked standardized PMAD care practices among health care providers. PARTICIPANTS: Health care providers (n = 2), staff (n = 4), and eligible patients (n = 78) at a private-practice women's health clinic. INTERVENTION/MEASUREMENTS: A screening, brief intervention, referral, and treatment/follow-up (SBIRT) model was used to screen eligible patients, provide treatment options, and appropriately refer for follow-up to mental health services. Team engagement occurred via weekly meetings. Measurements included pre-post maternal and team engagement survey results, biweekly chart review, and run chart analysis. RESULTS: Effective PMAD screening and right care were achieved for 85% of eligible individuals; this included receiving screening, referral to treatment, a scheduled mental health appointment, and clinic follow-up to ensure mental health care uptake. CONCLUSION: Use of the SBIRT model to implement a safety bundle may contribute to improved mental health outcomes for individuals receiving perinatal care in a private-practice outpatient health care setting. Education and engagement among clinicians, staff, and patients are key to successful implementation of a safety bundle.

Effect of an Obstetric Hemorrhage Bundle on Clinical Outcomes and Clinician Perceptions.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of an obstetric hemorrhage (OBH) safety bundle on health outcomes and to explore nurses' and physicians' perceptions of using the bundle. DESIGN: Descriptive longitudinal study, including review of electronic health records for 79,509 births, and clinician surveys. SETTING: Nine hospitals in the southwestern United States. PARTICIPANTS: 685 maternity nurses and 210 obstetricians. INTERVENTIONS/MEASUREMENTS: Retrospective and prospective data collection over 3.5 years to examine selected health outcomes before and after implementing an OBH bundle. A 10-item questionnaire was used to survey clinicians for their perceptions of bundle use. The Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture was used to explore nurses' views of the safety climate before and after bundle implementation. RESULTS: Statistically significant decreases in mean documented blood loss were observed with bundle use. Blood loss rates of less than 500 ml and greater than 1,000 ml increased, and blood loss rates of 500 to 1,000 ml decreased. Use of postpartum hemorrhage medications increased. When adjusted for multiple tests, there was no statistically significant difference in the rates of postpartum hysterectomies or ICU admissions or in length of stay. Clinicians' perceptions of bundle use were positive, with scores ranging from 6 to 8 on a scale of 1 to 10. However, Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture results indicated a decrease in nurses' perceptions of safety after bundle implementation. CONCLUSION: OBH bundles provide tools and guidance to improve perinatal care and outcomes. Our findings of lower mean blood loss, increased use of postpartum hemorrhage medications, and positive perceptions of the bundle differed from findings of previous studies. Nurses' perceptions of safety decreased, yet clinicians reported that care was safer with the OBH bundle. Nurses' commitment and collaboration are vital to the success of bundle implementation.

Prevention of Cardiac Surgery-Associated Acute Kidney Injury by Implementing the KDIGO Guidelines in High-Risk Patients Identified by Biomarkers: The PrevAKI-Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Prospective, single-center trials have shown that the implementation of the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) recommendations in high-risk patients significantly reduced the development of acute kidney injury (AKI) after surgery. We sought to evaluate the feasibility of implementing a bundle of supportive measures based on the KDIGO guideline in high-risk patients undergoing cardiac surgery in a multicenter setting in preparation for a large definitive trial. METHODS: In this multicenter, multinational, randomized controlled trial, we examined the adherence to the KDIGO bundle consisting of optimization of volume status and hemodynamics, functional hemodynamic monitoring, avoidance of nephrotoxic drugs, and prevention of hyperglycemia in high-risk patients identified by the urinary biomarkers tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-2 [TIMP-2] and insulin growth factor-binding protein 7 [IGFBP7] after cardiac surgery. The primary end point was the adherence to the bundle protocol and was evaluated by the percentage of compliant patients with a 95% confidence interval (CI) according to Clopper-Pearson. Secondary end points included the development and severity of AKI. RESULTS: In total, 278 patients were included in the final analysis. In the intervention group, 65.4% of patients received the complete bundle as compared to 4.2% in the control group (absolute risk reduction [ARR] 61.2 [95% CI, 52.6-69.9]; P < .001). AKI rates were statistically not different in both groups (46.3% intervention versus 41.5% control group; ARR -4.8% [95% CI, -16.4 to 6.9]; P = .423). However, the occurrence of moderate and severe AKI was significantly lower in the intervention group as compared to the control group (14.0% vs 23.9%; ARR 10.0% [95% CI, 0.9-19.1]; P = .034). There were no significant effects on other specified secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a KDIGO-derived treatment bundle is feasible in a multinational setting. Furthermore, moderate to severe AKI was significantly reduced in the intervention group.

Spillover effects of mandatory hip and knee replacement surgery bundles in medicare.

BACKGROUND: Medicare used the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) Model to mandate that hospitals in certain health care markets accept bundled payments for lower extremity joint replacement surgery. CJR has reduced spending with stable quality as intended among Medicare fee-for-service patients, but benefits could "spill over" to individuals insured through private health plans. Definitive evidence of spillovers remains lacking. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between CJR participation and changes in outcomes among privately insured individuals. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: We used 2013-2017 Health Care Cost Institute claims for 418,016 privately insured individuals undergoing joint replacement in 75 CJR and 121 Non-CJR markets. Multivariable generalized linear models with hospital and market random effects and time fixed effects were used to analyze the association between CJR participation and changes in outcomes. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Total episode spending, discharge to institutional post-acute care, and quality (e.g., surgical complications, readmissions). RESULTS: Patients in CJR and Non-CJR markets did not differ in total episode spending (difference of -$157, 95% CI -$1043 to $728, p = 0.73) or discharge to institutional post-acute care (difference of -1.1%, 95% CI -3.2%-1.0%, p = 0.31). Similarly, patients in the two groups did not differ in quality or other utilization outcomes. Findings were generally similar in stratified and sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: There was a lack of evidence of cost or utilization spillovers from CJR to privately insured individuals. There may be limits in the ability of certain value-based payment reforms to drive broad changes in care delivery and patient outcomes.

Surgical-Site Infection Prevention After Hysterectomy: Use of a Consensus Bundle to Guide Improvement.

Hysterectomy is one of the most commonly performed surgeries in women. Surgical-site infections (SSI) after hysterectomy can lead to increased morbidity and mortality as well as readmission, which is associated with increased costs for health systems. The aim of the project was to improve standardization of preoperative education on infection prevention and incorporate the use of preoperative chlorhexidine (CHG) bathing for patients undergoing hysterectomy to decrease rates of SSI. Data on SSI after hysterectomy were reviewed. Tracer methodology was used to identify gaps in the preoperative process by comparing the current process to the Council on Patient Safety in Women's Health Care Patient Safety Bundle "Prevention of Surgical Site Infection after Gynecologic Surgery." After implementation, survey data were collected on adherence to the washing protocol, and SSI data were monitored. Survey results reflected high compliance with the CHG washing protocol, provision of patient education, and overall patient satisfaction with the process. Before implementation in 2016, we reported 8 deep or organ/space SSI to the National Healthcare Safety Network. After implementation in 2018, we reported 3 deep or organ/space SSI. Standardizing infection prevention processes to align with safety bundles improves the quality of care provided to patients.

Pathway times in the mammography programme before and after introduction of the breast cancer care pathway. / Forløpstider i Mammografi-programmet før og etter innføring av pakkeforløp for brystkreft.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of introducing the 'cancer patient pathway for breast cancer' was to ensure a coherent treatment pathway without unnecessary delays. Radiologists and pathologists who work with breast diagnostics are involved in both cancer patient pathways and BreastScreen Norway. The extent to which this policy may have affected waiting times has not been analysed previously. This study presents waiting times in BreastScreen Norway before and after introduction of cancer patient pathway. MATERIAL AND METHOD: We analysed waiting times associated with 1 485 240 screening examinations undertaken as part of BreastScreen Norway in the period 01.7.2011-30.6.2018, stratified by breast diagnostic centre. Waiting times were defined as the number of calendar days from the a) screening examination to the dispatch of the negative results letter (dispatch time), b) screening examination to the date on which the follow-up examination was performed (follow-up examination time) and c) follow-up examination to diagnosis (diagnosis time). Data were retrieved from the Cancer Registry of Norway's databases. Use of these is set out in the Cancer Registry Regulations. We calculated median waiting times in addition to 90th percentiles. RESULTS: The median dispatch time was 13 days before the cancer patient pathway was introduced, and 12 days after. The median follow-up examination time increased from 23 to 27 days, while the median diagnosis time was 3 days both before and after introduction of the cancer patient pathway. INTERPRETATION: Dispatch and diagnosis times were unchanged, or slightly changed after introduction of the cancer patient pathway, while follow-up examination time increased somewhat. Introduction of the cancer patient pathway may have led to differential adjustments in priorities, workflows and access to resources between the breast diagnostic centres.

Impact of Bundled Care on Outcomes Following Elective Primary Total Hip or Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Standardized approaches to care and care pathways for patients with joint replacement have been shown to decrease length of stay (LOS), improve patient participation in education, decrease patient anxiety while improving perception of care, and lead to overall efficiency and improved care and outcomes. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether implementation of a standardized bundle approach to care influenced the outcomes after total hip or total knee arthroplasty (THA or TKA). METHODS: A retrospective, quasi-experimental before- and after-design study was used to evaluate the impact of the intervention. Two hospitals implemented a standardized bundle of care for patients undergoing THA or TKA that included preoperative patient education, day of surgery mobilization, and a total joint group physical therapy session (Full Bundle). Data analyses were completed on a convenience sample of 2,200 patients who underwent THA or TKA. Outcomes data measured were LOS, discharge disposition, costs, and readmission rate. RESULTS: Patients receiving the Full Bundle had significant reduction in LOS of roughly 1 day (OR = 1.687, 95% CI [1.578, 1.797]) versus group not receiving all elements (OR = 2.706; 95% CI [2.623, 2.789]). Full Bundle patients were 6 times more likely to be discharged home compared with the Partial Bundle group (OR = 6.01, 95% CI [4.01, 9.03]). Full Bundle group had significantly lower total direct costs, F(1) = 4.06, p = .046, partial η = 0.003. There were no differences in readmission rates between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Patients who had all elements of the THA/TKA bundle had the best outcomes. By improving efficiencies of care through the use of the bundle, the 2 hospitals positively impacted the care and outcomes of THA and TKA patients.

Communication at Transitions of Care.

Communication errors during transitions of care are a leading source of adverse events for hospitalized patients. This article provides an overview of the role of communication errors in adverse events, describes the complexities of communication for hospitalized patients, and provides evidence regarding the positive effects of applying high-reliability principles to transitions of care and culture of safety. Elements of effective handoffs and a detailed approach for successful implementation of a handoff program are provided. The role of handoff communication in medical education at all levels, as well as for the interprofessional team, is discussed.

Back to Basics: CLABSI Reduction Through Implementation of an Oral Care and Hygiene Bundle.

Children with cancer often undergo treatments that render them severely immunocompromised. Side effects of treatment place them at risk for developing oral mucositis (OM), which can potentially lead to infection and bacteremia. Staff nurses on an inpatient pediatric oncology unit noted inconsistent daily oral hygiene practices despite assessing OM consistently. Basic oral hygiene can reduce the severity of OM, and evidence-based bundled care has shown to increase consistency of practice. Based on findings and recommendations from the literature, an oral care and hygiene bundle was developed. The oral care bundle included a soft bristled toothbrush, fluoride toothpaste, twice-daily brushing and sodium bicarbonate rinses, lip balm, and oral moisturizer. The hygiene component consisted of a daily bath or shower and daily linen changes. Education on the rationale and purpose for the use of an oral care and hygiene bundle was provided to the inpatient direct care staff prior to implementation on two inpatient oncology units. Audits were performed to measure the adherence of the oral care and hygiene bundle. Central line-associated bloodstream infections were measured in collaboration with the quality and infection prevention departments. Since the oral care and hygiene bundle was implemented, laboratory-confirmed bloodstream infection rates decreased from 1.05 to 0.54 per 1,000 catheter days, while mucosal barrier injury rates decreased from 2.98 to 1.27 per 1,000 catheter days.

Safety Bundles in Gynecology.

Patient safety bundles and checklists have been shown to improve outcomes in medicine, surgery, and obstetrics. Until recently, there has been less study into their use in the gynecology setting. Here, we review the available evidence and examples of successful checklist and bundle implementation in gynecology and encourage more robust implementation and standardization in our field going forward.

Initiating End-of-Life Care at the Emergency Department: An Observational Study.

OBJECTIVE: Terminally ill patients at their end-of-life (EOL) phase attending the emergency department (ED) may have complex and specialized care needs frequently overlooked by ED physicians. To tailor to the needs of this unique group, the ED in a tertiary hospital implemented an EOL pathway since 2014. The objective of our study is to describe the epidemiological characteristics, symptom burden and management of patients using a protocolized management care bundle. METHODS: We conducted an observational study on the database of EOL patients over a 28-month period. Patients aged 21 years and above, who attended the ED and were managed according to these guidelines, were included. Clinical data were extracted from the hospital's electronic medical records system. RESULTS: Two hundred five patients were managed under the EOL pathway, with a slight male predominance (106/205, 51.7%) and a median age of 78 (interquartile range 69-87) years. The majority were chronically frail (42.0%) or diagnosed with cancer or other terminal illnesses (32.7%). The 3 most commonly experienced symptoms were drowsiness (66.3%), dyspnea (61.5%), and fever (29.7%). Through the protocolized management care bundle, 74.1% of patients with dyspnea and/or pain received opiates while 59.5% with copious secretions received hyoscine butylbromide for symptomatic relief. CONCLUSION: The institution of a protocolized care bundle is feasible and provides ED physicians with a guide in managing EOL patients. Though still suboptimal, considerable advances in EOL care at the ED have been achieved and may be further improved through continual education and enhancements in the care bundle.

Evaluation of the Collaborative Use of an Evidence-Based Care Bundle in Emergency Laparotomy.

Importance: Patients undergoing emergency laparotomy have high mortality, but few studies exist to improve outcomes for these patients. Objective: To assess whether a collaborative approach to implement a 6-point care bundle is associated with reduction in mortality and length of stay and improvement in the delivery of standards of care across a group of hospitals. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Emergency Laparotomy Collaborative (ELC) was a UK-based prospective quality improvement study of the implementation of a care bundle provided to patients requiring emergency laparotomy between October 1, 2015, and September 30, 2017. Participants were 28 National Health Service hospitals and emergency surgical patients who were treated at these hospitals and whose data were entered into the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA) database. Post-ELC implementation outcomes were compared with baseline data from July 1, 2014, to September 30, 2015. Data entry and collection were performed through the NELA. Interventions: A 6-point, evidence-based care bundle was used. The bundle included prompt measurement of blood lactate levels, early review and treatment for sepsis, transfer to the operating room within defined time goals after the decision to operate, use of goal-directed fluid therapy, postoperative admission to an intensive care unit, and multidisciplinary involvement of senior clinicians in the decision and delivery of perioperative care. Change management and leadership coaching were provided to ELC leadership teams. Main Outcome and Measures: Primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, both crude and Portsmouth Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enumeration of Mortality and morbidity (P-POSSUM) risk-adjusted, and length of stay. Secondary outcomes were the changes after implementation of the separate metrics in the care bundle. Results: A total of 28 hospitals participated in the ELC and completed the project. The baseline group included 5562 patients (2937 female [52.8%] and a mean [range] age of 65.3 [18.0-114.0] years), whereas the post-ELC group had 9247 patients (4911 female [53.1%] and a mean [range] age of 65.0 [18.0-99.0] years). Unadjusted mortality rate decreased from 9.8% at baseline to 8.3% in year 2 of the project, and so did risk-adjusted mortality from a baseline of 5.3% to 4.5% post-ELC. Mean length of stay decreased from 20.1 days during year 1 to 18.9 days during year 2. Significant changes in 5 of the 6 metrics in the care bundle were achieved. Conclusions and Relevance: A collaborative approach using a quality improvement methodology and a care bundle appeared to be effective in reducing mortality and length of stay in emergency laparotomy, suggesting that hospitals should adopt such an approach to see better patient outcomes and care delivery performance.

Knowledge and behavior of professionals about bundled strategies of central venous catheter / Conocimiento y comportamiento de profesionales sobre el bundle de catéter venoso central / Conhecimento e comportamento de profissionais sobre o bundle de cateter venoso central

ABSTRACT Objective: To investigate the factors that influence the knowledge and behavior of professionals of neonatal and pediatric units about bundled strategies of insertion of central venous catheter. Method: This is a cross-sectional study, conducted in one neonatal and one pediatric intensive care units in a public hospital in Belo Horizonte, Brazil, from April to July, 2016. The sample consisted of 255 professionals who answered a structured instrument. Descriptive and comparative analyses were made using the SPSS software. Results: The category nursing professional (p = 0.010), working hours of 12×36 scale (p < 0.001), training as a form of acquiring knowledge (p < 0.001) and participation in training programs (p < 0.001) are associated to greater knowledge about the bundle. Regarding behavior, no significant associations were observed. Conclusion: The study showed that there are factors that influence the knowledge about bundled strategies of insertion of central venous catheter, reflecting the need to consider these practices for making more effective educational practices in health care.

RESUMEN Objetivo: Investigar los factores que influencian el conocimiento y comportamiento de los profesionales de unidades neonatales y pediátricas sobre el bundle de inserción del catéter venoso central. Método: Estudio transversal que se realizó en dos unidades de terapia intensiva neonatal y pediátrica de un hospital público de Belo Horizonte, en el período de abril a julio de 2016. La muestra se constituyó de 255 profesionales, que respondieron a un instrumento estructurado. Se realizaron análisis descriptivos y comparativos por medio del software SPSS. Resultados: La categoría profesional de enfermero (p = 0,010), la jornada de trabajo de 12 × 36 horas (p < 0,001), el entrenamiento como forma de adquisición del conocimiento (p < 0,001) y la participación en entrenamientos (p < 0,001) se asocian al mayor conocimiento sobre el bundle. En cuanto al comportamiento, no se observaron asociaciones significativas. Conclusión: Se ha revelado que existen factores que influencian el conocimiento sobre el bundle de inserción de catéter central, reflejando la necesidad de considerarlos para la realización de prácticas educativas más efectivas en salud.

RESUMO Objetivo: Investigar os fatores que influenciam o conhecimento e comportamento dos profissionais de unidades neonatais e pediátricas sobre o bundle de inserção do cateter venoso central. Método: Estudo transversal, realizado em duas unidades de terapia intensiva neonatal e pediátrica de um hospital público de Belo Horizonte, no período de abril a julho de 2016. A amostra constituiu-se de 255 profissionais, que responderam a um instrumento estruturado. Foram realizadas análises descritivas e comparativas por meio do software SPSS. Resultados: A categoria profissional de enfermeiro (p = 0,010), a jornada de trabalho de 12×36 horas (p < 0,001), o treinamento como forma de aquisição do conhecimento (p < 0,001) e a participação em treinamentos (p < 0,001) estão associados ao maior conhecimento sobre o bundle. Quanto ao comportamento, não se observou associações significativas. Conclusão: Revelou-se que existem fatores que influenciam o conhecimento sobre o bundle de inserção de cateter central, refletindo a necessidade de considerá-los para a realização de práticas educativas mais efetivas em saúde.

Preoperative Chlorhexidine Gluconate Scrub Shower for Inpatient Vascular Patients: A Quality Improvement Project.

The etiology of surgical site infection (SSI) is multifactorial, with efforts to combat it employing "bundled" initiatives. Preoperative antiseptic wash was classified by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention as a Category IB strongly recommended and accepted practice. Its inclusion, in a best-practice bundle, may contribute to reduction in SSIs. We describe our quality improvement initiative to increase adherence to this critical bundle element.