Novel standardized indexes of brainstem auditory evoked potentials for predicting hearing preservation in vestibular schwannomas.

Hearing preservation (HP) during vestibular schwannomas (VSs) surgery poses a significant challenge. Although brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs) on the affected side are commonly employed to monitor cochlear nerve function, their low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) renders them susceptible to interferences, compromising their reliability. We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients who underwent tumor resection, while binaural brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs) were simultaneously recorded during surgery. To standardize BAEPs on the affected side, we incorporated the synchronous healthy side as a reference (interval between affected and healthy side ≤ 3 min). A total of 127 patients were enrolled. Comparison of the raw BAEPs data pre- and post-tumor resection revealed that neither V-wave amplitude (Am-V) nor latency (La-V) could serve as reliable predictors of HP simultaneously. However, following standardization, V-wave latency (STIAS-La-V) and amplitude (STIAS-Am-V) emerged as stable predictors of HP. Furthermore, the intraoperative difference in V-wave amplitude (D-Am-V) predicted postoperative HP in patients with preoperative HP and remained predictive after standardization. The utilization of intraoperative synchronous healthy side BAEPs as a reference to eliminate interferences proves to be an effective approach in enhancing the reliability of BAEPs for predicting HP in VSs patients.

Intraoperative assessment of cochlear nerve functionality in various vestibular schwannoma scenarios: Lessons learned.

The use of cochlear implants (CIs) is on the rise for patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS). Besides CI following tumor resection, new scenarios such as implantation in observed and/or irradiated tumors are becoming increasingly common. A significant emerging trend is the need of intraoperative evaluation of the functionality of the cochlear nerve in order to decide if a CI would be placed. The purpose of this paper is to explore the experience of a tertiary center with the application of the Auditory Nerve Test System (ANTS) in various scenarios regarding VS patients. The results are compared to that of the studies that have previously used the ANTS in this condition. Patients with unilateral or bilateral VS (NF2) who were evaluated with the ANTS prior to considering CI in a tertiary center between 2021 and 2023 were analyzed. The presence of a robust wave V was chosen to define a positive electrical auditory brainstem response (EABR). Two patients underwent promontory stimulation (PromStim) EABR previous to ANTS evaluation. Seven patients, 2 NF-2 and 5 with sporadic VS were included. The initial scenario was simultaneous translabyrinthine (TL) tumor resection and CI in 3 cases while a CI placement without tumor resection was planned in 4 cases. The ANTS was positive in 4 cases, negative in 2 cases, and uncertain in one case. Two patients underwent simultaneous TL and CI, 1 patient simultaneous TL and auditory brainstem implant, 3 patients posterior tympanotomy with CI, and 1 patient had no implant placement. In the 5 patients undergoing CI, sound detection was present. There was a good correlation between the PromStim and ANTS EABR. The literature research yielded 35 patients with complete information about EABR response. There was one false negative and one false positive case; that is, the 28 implanted cases with a present wave V following tumor resection had some degree of auditory perception in all but one case. The ANTS is a useful intraoperative tool to asses CI candidacy in VS patients undergoing observation, irradiation or surgery. A positive strongly predicts at least sound detection with the CI.

Surface electrical stimulation of the auditory cortex preserves efferent medial olivocochlear neurons and reduces cochlear traits of age-related hearing loss.

The auditory cortex is the source of descending connections providing contextual feedback for auditory signal processing at almost all levels of the lemniscal auditory pathway. Such feedback is essential for cognitive processing. It is likely that corticofugal pathways are degraded with aging, becoming important players in age-related hearing loss and, by extension, in cognitive decline. We are testing the hypothesis that surface, epidural stimulation of the auditory cortex during aging may regulate the activity of corticofugal pathways, resulting in modulation of central and peripheral traits of auditory aging. Increased auditory thresholds during ongoing age-related hearing loss in the rat are attenuated after two weeks of epidural stimulation with direct current applied to the surface of the auditory cortex for two weeks in alternate days (Fernández del Campo et al., 2024). Here we report that the same cortical electrical stimulation protocol induces structural and cytochemical changes in the aging cochlea and auditory brainstem, which may underlie recovery of age-degraded auditory sensitivity. Specifically, we found that in 18 month-old rats after two weeks of cortical electrical stimulation there is, relative to age-matched non-stimulated rats: a) a larger number of choline acetyltransferase immunoreactive neuronal cell body profiles in the ventral nucleus of the trapezoid body, originating the medial olivocochlear system.; b) a reduction of age-related dystrophic changes in the stria vascularis; c) diminished immunoreactivity for the pro-inflammatory cytokine TNFα in the stria vascularis and spiral ligament. d) diminished immunoreactivity for Iba1 and changes in the morphology of Iba1 immunoreactive cells in the lateral wall, suggesting reduced activation of macrophage/microglia; d) Increased immunoreactivity levels for calretinin in spiral ganglion neurons, suggesting excitability modulation by corticofugal stimulation. Altogether, these findings support that non-invasive neuromodulation of the auditory cortex during aging preserves the cochlear efferent system and ameliorates cochlear aging traits, including stria vascularis dystrophy, dysregulated inflammation and altered excitability in primary auditory neurons.

Intraoperative EABR Testing Predicts Strength of Cochlear Implant Stimulation Optimized After Long-Term Use in Pediatric Malformation Ears.

OBJECTIVE: This study focused on the intensities of cochlear implant (CI) stimulation in pediatric CI users with inner ear malformation or cochlear nerve deficiency (CND). In this population, CI programming is difficult because a large intensity of CI stimulation is required to achieve sufficient hearing, but the excess CI stimuli often induce facial nerve stimulation. We aimed to assess whether the results of intraoperative electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (EABRs) testing predict maximum current levels of CI stimuli (cC levels) optimized by a behavioral-based method after long-term CI use. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective case review. SETTING: A tertiary referral CI center. PATIENTS: A total of 116 ears with malformations (malformation group) and 63 control ears (control group) from patients younger than 18 years who received CI. The malformation group comprised 23 ears with a common cavity (CC), 26 with incomplete partition type 1 (IP-1), 26 with incomplete partition type 2 (IP-2), and 41 with CND. INTERVENTIONS: Diagnostic. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Correlation between intraoperative EABR results and cC levels determined by the behavioral-based CI programming after long-term CI use. RESULTS: The CC, IP-1, and CND ears required significantly larger cC levels than the IP-2 ears and control groups. However, the cC levels increased to reach the plateau 1 year after surgery in all groups. Among the malformation group, 79 ears underwent intraoperative EABR testing. Greater than 80% of the CC, IP-1, and IP-2 ears and 54.8% of the CND ears exhibited evoked wave V (eV) and were included in the eV-positive category. Myogenic responses but no eV were observed in 18.2, 15.0, and 35.5% of the CC, IP-1, and CND ears, defined as the myogenic category. No eV or myogenic response was elicited in 9.7% of the CND ears. We focused on minimum current levels that elicited eV (eV levels) in the eV-positive category and maximum current levels that did not elicit any myogenic responses (myogenic levels) in the myogenic category. A significant relationship was detected between the eV levels and the cC levels. When analyzed in each malformation type, the eV levels significantly correlate with the cC levels in the CC and CND ears but not in the IP-1 and IP-2 ears, probably because of slight variation within the IP-1 group and the small number of the IP-2 group. The myogenic category did not show a significant relationship between the myogenic levels and cC levels, but the cC levels were similar to or smaller than the myogenic levels in most ears. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed that intraoperative EABR testing helps predict the optimal cC levels in malformation ears. EABR-based CI programming immediately after cochlear implantation, followed by behavioral-based CI programming, may allow us to achieve early postoperative optimization of CI maps even in young children with severe malformations.

Intraoperative Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potentials and Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting After Microvascular Decompression.

BACKGROUND: We performed this study to investigate the effect of intraoperative brainstem auditory evoked potential (IBAEP) changes on the development of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after microvascular decompression (MVD) for neurovascular cross compression. METHODS: A total of 373 consecutive cases were treated with MVD. The use of rescue antiemetics after surgery was used as an objective indicator of PONV. IBAEP monitoring was routinely performed in all. RESULTS: The use of rescue antiemetics was significantly associated with female sex (OR = 3.427; 95% CI, 2.077-5.654; P < 0.001), PCA use (OR = 3.333; 95% CI, 1.861-5.104; P < 0.001), and operation time (OR = 1.017; 95% CI, 1.008-1.026; P < 0.001). A Wave V peak delay of more than 1.0 milliseconds showed a significant relation with the use of rescue antiemetics (OR = 1.787; 95% CI, 1.114-2.867; P = 0.016) and a strong significant relation with the use of rescue antiemetics more than 5 times (OR = 2.426; 95% CI, 1.372-4.290; P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: A wave V peak delay of more than 1.0 milliseconds might have value as a predictor of PONV after MVD. More detailed neurophysiological studies will identify the exact pathophysiology underlying PONV after MVD.

Auditory brainstem responses are resistant to pharmacological modulation in Sprague Dawley wild-type and Neurexin1α knockout rats.

Sensory processing in the auditory brainstem can be studied with auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) across species. There is, however, a limited understanding of ABRs as tools to assess the effect of pharmacological interventions. Therefore, we set out to understand how pharmacological agents that target key transmitter systems of the auditory brainstem circuitry affect ABRs in rats. Given previous studies, demonstrating that Nrxn1α KO Sprague Dawley rats show substantial auditory processing deficits and altered sensitivity to GABAergic modulators, we used both Nrxn1α KO and wild-type littermates in our study. First, we probed how different commonly used anesthetics (isoflurane, ketamine/xylazine, medetomidine) affect ABRs. In the next step, we assessed the effects of different pharmacological compounds (diazepam, gaboxadol, retigabine, nicotine, baclofen, and bitopertin) either under isoflurane or medetomidine anesthesia. We found that under our experimental conditions, ABRs are largely unaffected by diverse pharmacological modulation. Significant modulation was observed with (i) nicotine, affecting the late ABRs components at 90 dB stimulus intensity under isoflurane anesthesia in both genotypes and (ii) retigabine, showing a slight decrease in late ABRs deflections at 80 dB stimulus intensity, mainly in isoflurane anesthetized Nrxn1α KO rats. Our study suggests that ABRs in anesthetized rats are resistant to a wide range of pharmacological modulators, which has important implications for the applicability of ABRs to study auditory brainstem physiology.

[Study on gene therapy for DPOAE and ABR threshold changes in adult Otof-/- mice].

Objective:This study aims to analyze the threshold changes in distortion product otoacoustic emissions（DPOAE） and auditory brainstem response（ABR） in adult Otof-/- mice before and after gene therapy, evaluating its effectiveness and exploring methods for assessing hearing recovery post-treatment. Methods:At the age of 4 weeks, adult Otof-/- mice received an inner ear injection of a therapeutic agent containing intein-mediated recombination of the OTOF gene, delivered via dual AAV vectors through the round window membrane（RWM）. Immunofluorescence staining assessed the proportion of inner ear hair cells with restored otoferlin expression and the number of synapses.Statistical analysis was performed to compare the DPOAE and ABR thresholds before and after the treatment. Results:AAV-PHP. eB demonstrates high transduction efficiency in inner ear hair cells. The therapeutic regimen corrected hearing loss in adult Otof-/- mice without impacting auditory function in wild-type mice. The changes in DPOAE and ABR thresholds after gene therapy are significantly correlated at 16 kHz. Post-treatment,a slight increase in DPOAE was observeds,followed by a recovery trend at 2 months post-treatment. Conclusion:Gene therapy significantly restored hearing in adult Otof-/- mice, though the surgical delivery may cause transient hearing damage. Precise and gentle surgical techniques are essential to maximize gene therapy's efficacy.

Analysis of predictive factors related to long-term hearing and temporal bone development in congenital microtia.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the predictive factors of long-term hearing threshold and temporal bone development in children with congenital microtia (CM). METHODS: 74 patients (92 ears) with CM enrolled, which all had auditory brainstem response (ABR) results during infancy or toddlerhood, pure tone audiometry (PTA) and high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) results during childhood or adolescence, and had not undergone any surgery. We compared the relationship between ABR, auditory steady-state response (ASSR), the affected side, auricular morphology, presence of external auditory canal stenosis or atresia, PTA average, mastoid pneumatization, Jarhsdoerfer scores, and wether cholesteatoma exists. RESULTS: The average age of ABR in 92 ears was 2.72 ± 3.52 years old, PTA was 7.26 ± 2.51 and HRCT was 6.91 ± 2.76 years old. ABR-AC was related to PTA average, mastoid pneumatization, Jarhsdoerfer scores, and wether cholesteatoma exists in CM. While ABR-ABG was related to all of these factors except Jarhsdoerfer score, and ABR-BC had no relationship with any of them. ASSR only showed correlation with frequencies of 1, 2 kHz and was related to Jarhsdoerfer score, with no other correlations observed. The impaired ear side showed no relevance. However, auricular morphology was related to all of these factors except wether cholesteatoma exist. External auditory canal stenosis or atresia was related to PTA average, but unrelated to mastoid pneumatization. CONCLUSION: The ABR examination in the infant stage plays a crucial role in predicting the long-term hearing and temporal bone development in patients with CM.

Preoperative EABR evaluation of auditory pathway integrity in patients with different etiology and postoperative effect estimation.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of electrical auditory brainstem response (EABR) on the integrity evaluation of auditory pathway and the prediction of postoperative effect of cochlear implantation in patients with different etiology of hearing loss. METHODS: A total of 580 patients with neuropathic deafness who underwent cochlear implantation surgery from August 2011 to December 2020 were selected for EABR test. The preoperative EABR waveform was analyzed, and parameters such as V wave amplitude, threshold, latency and interval of each wave, and slope of V wave I/O curve were measured. Neural response telemetry (NRT) test was performed during MAP 1 month after operation, and C and T values of the machine were recorded. RESULTS: The total EABR extraction rate was 98.45% among 580 patients, including 100% for the normal structure group and enlarged vestibular aqueduct group (LVAS), 92.44% for other malformed group. The average threshold of V wave in patients with normal cochlear structure was significantly better than the malformation groups (p < 0.05). The total extraction rate of NRT was 78.62%, including 99.72% in the group with normal structure, 95.65% in the LVAS group, 1.85-88.24% in the group with other malformations, and 0% in the cochlear ossification group. The correlation analysis showed a statistically significant correlation between the average preoperative EABR threshold and the C value of NRT. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative EABR could evaluate the integrity of auditory conduction pathway of patients with cochlear implantation and predict the postoperative hearing rehabilitation effect.

Intra-cochlear Flushing Reduces Tissue Response to Cochlear Implantation.

INTRODUCTION: Intraoperative trauma leading to bleeding during cochlear implantation negatively impacts residual hearing of cochlear implant recipients. There are no clinical protocols for the removal of blood during implantation, to reduce the consequential effects such as inflammation and fibrosis which adversely affect cochlear health and residual hearing. This preclinical study investigated the implementation of an intra-cochlear flushing protocol for the removal of blood. METHODS: Three groups of guinea pigs were studied for 28 days after cochlear implantation; cochlear implant-only (control group); cochlear implant with blood injected into the cochlea (blood group); and cochlear implant, blood injection, and flushing of the blood from the cochlea intraoperatively (flush group). Auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) in addition to tissue response volumes were analyzed and compared between groups. RESULTS: After implantation, the blood group exhibited the highest ABR thresholds when compared to the control and flush group, particularly in the high frequencies. On the final day, the control and blood group had similar ABR thresholds across all frequencies tested, whereas the flush group had the lowest thresholds, significantly lower at 24 kHz than the blood and control group. Analysis of the tissue response showed the flush group had significantly lower tissue responses in the basal half of the array when compared with the blood and control group. CONCLUSIONS: Flushing intra-cochlear blood during surgery resulted in better auditory function and reduced subsequent fibrosis in the basal region of the cochlea. This finding prompts the implementation of a flushing protocol in clinical cochlear implantation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A Laryngoscope, 134:1410-1416, 2024.

The influence of intraoperative auditory brainstem responses on vibroplasty coupling-quality and analysis of the impact of different fixation steps on the coupling.

PURPOSE: The Vibrant Soundbridge (VSB) is an established active-middle-ear-implant for patients with moderate-to-profound hearing-loss. This surgery is referred to as "Vibroplasty". Sufficient transfer of the VSB's floating-mass-transducers (FMT) energy to the inner ear is a crucial factor influencing the coupling-quality (CQ). However, assessing CQ is hamper by two issues: the method of CQ-assessment itself and the method of FMT-fixation during Vibroplasty. METHODS: This prospective study explored the influence of intraoperative auditory-brainstem-response (+ ABR) measurements and various fixation methods on postoperative CQ after Vibroplasty as compared to matched-patients after Vibroplasty without intraoperative ABR (-ABR). Propensity-score-matching was performed based on preoperative bone-conduction-pure-tone-average-3 (BC-PTA3) at 1-, 2- and 4 kHz. Primary outcome parameters were postoperative CQ-PTA3, intraoperative ABR threshold for various fixation methods and postoperative BC-PTA3. RESULTS: A total of 28 patients were included, of which 14 were + ABR. Preoperative BC-PTA3, sex, age, and number of previous surgeries did not differ significantly between groups (all p > 0.301). Mean postoperative CQ-PTA3 was significantly better for + ABR (1.8 vs. 12.3 dB-HL; p = 0.006). Mean intraoperative ABR threshold was superior for cartilage-counter-bearing and cartilage-housing compared to additional fixation with injectable-platelet-rich- fibrin (53 vs. 56 & 57 dB-HL, respectively; p = 0.04; η2 = 0.33). Mean postoperative BC-PTA3 did not significantly differ between patients (41.4 vs. 41.8 dB-HL; p = 0.77). A total of 7% of the patients required intraoperative readjustment of the FMT based on unsatisfactory intraoperative ABR threshold. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative ABR measurement resulted in significantly better postoperative CQ. Cartilage-counter-bearing and cartilage-housing were observed to have superior CQ. A total of 7% of the patients could be spared revision-Vibroplasty due to intraoperative ABR measurement.

Neonatal hearing screening - does failure in TEOAE screening matter when the AABR test is passed?

PURPOSE: Newborns who fail the transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) but pass the automatic auditory brainstem response (AABR) in universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS), frequently have no further diagnostic test or follow-up. The present study aimed to investigate whether hearing loss might be missed by ignoring neonatal TEOAE failure in the presence of normal AABR. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted in newborns presenting between 2017 and 2021 to a tertiary referral centre due to failure in the initial UNHS. The main focus was on infants who failed TEOAE tests, but passed AABR screening. The clinical characteristics and audiometric outcomes were analysed and compared with those of other neonates. RESULTS: Among 1,095 referred newborns, 253 (23%) failed TEOAE despite passing AABR screening. Of the 253 affected infants, 154 returned for follow-up. At 1-year follow-up, 46 (28%) achieved normal audiometric results. 32 (21%) infants had permanent hearing loss (HL) confirmed by diagnostic ABR, 58 (38%) infants had HL solely due to middle ear effusion (MEE), and for 18 (12%) infants HL was suspected without further differentiation. The majority of permanent HL was mild (78% mild vs. 13% moderate vs. 9% profound). The rate of spontaneous MEE clearance was rather low (29%) leading to early surgical intervention in 36 children. The profile of the risk factors for hearing impairment was similar to that of newborns with failure in both, TEOAE and AABR; however, there was a stronger association between the presence of risk factors and the incidence of HL (relative risk 1.55 vs. 1.06; odds ratio 3.61 vs. 1.80). CONCLUSION: In newborns, the discordance between a "refer" in TEOAE and a "pass" in AABR screening is associated with a substantial prevalence of hearing impairment at follow-up, especially in the presence of risk factors.

Preserved Auditory Steady State Response and Envelope-Following Response in Severe Brainstem Dysfunction Highlight the Need for Cross-Checking.

OBJECTIVES: Commercially available auditory steady state response (ASSR) systems are widely used to obtain hearing thresholds in the pediatric population objectively. Children are often examined during natural or induced sleep so that the recorded ASSRs are of subcortical origin, the inferior colliculus being often designated as the main ASSR contributor in these conditions. This report presents data from a battery of auditory neurophysiological objective tests obtained in 3 cases of severe brainstem dysfunction in sleeping children. In addition to ASSRs, envelope-following response (EFR) recordings designed to distinguish peripheral (cochlear nerve) from central (brainstem) were recorded to document the effect of brainstem dysfunction on the two types of phase-locked responses. DESIGN: Results obtained in the 3 children with severe brainstem dysfunctions were compared with those of age-matched controls. The cases were identified as posterior fossa tumor, undiagnosed (UD), and Pelizaeus-Merzbacher-Like Disease. The standard audiological objective tests comprised tympanograms, distortion product otoacoustic emissions, click-evoked auditory brainstem responses (ABRs), and ASSRs. EFRs were recorded using horizontal (EFR-H) and vertical (EFR-V) channels and a stimulus phase rotation technique allowing isolation of the EFR waveforms in the time domain to obtain direct latency measurements. RESULTS: The brainstem dysfunctions of the 3 children were revealed as abnormal (weak, absent, or delayed) ABRs central waves with a normal wave I. In addition, they all presented a summating and cochlear microphonic potential in their ABRs, coupled with a normal wave I, which implies normal cochlear and cochlear nerve function. EFR-H and EFR-V waveforms were identified in the two cases in whom they were recorded. The EFR-Hs onset latencies, response durations, and phase-locking values did not differ from their respective age-matched control values, indicating normal cochlear nerve EFRs. In contrast, the EFR-V phase-locking value and onset latency varied from their control values. Both patients had abnormal but identifiable and significantly phase-locked brainstem EFRs, even in a case with severely distorted ABR central waves. ASSR objective audiograms were recorded in two cases. They showed normal or slightly elevated (explained by a slight transmission loss) thresholds that do not yield any clue about their brainstem dysfunction, revealing the method's lack of sensitivity to severe brainstem dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: The present study, performed on 3 sleeping children with severe brainstem dysfunction but normal cochlear responses (cochlear microphonic potential, summating potential, and ABR wave I), revealed the differential sensitivity of three auditory electrophysiological techniques. Estimated thresholds obtained by standard ASSR recordings (cases UD and Pelizaeus-Merzbacher-Like Disease) provided no clue to the brainstem dysfunction clearly revealed by the click-evoked ABR. EFR recordings (cases posterior fossa tumor and UD) showed preserved central responses with abnormal latencies and low phase-locking values, whereas the peripheral EFR attributed to the cochlear nerve was normal. The one case (UD) for which the three techniques could be performed confirms this sensitivity gradient, emphasizing the need for applying the Cross-Check Principle by avoiding resorting to ASSR recording alone. The entirely normal EFR-H recordings observed in two cases further strengthen the hypothesis of its cochlear nerve origin in sleeping children.

Relationships between bilateral auditory brainstem activity and inter-implant interval in children with cochlear implants.

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of the interval between bilateral cochlear implantation on the development of bilateral peripheral auditory pathways as revealed by the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (EABR). METHODS: Fifty-eight children with profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss were recruited. Among them, 33 children received sequential bilateral cochlear implants (CIs), and 25 children received simultaneous bilateral CIs. The bilateral EABRs evoked by electrical stimulation from the CI electrode were recorded on the day of second-side CI activation. RESULTS: The latencies of wave III (eIII) and wave V (eV) were significantly shorter on the first CI side than on the second CI side in children with sequential bilateral CIs but were similar between the two sides in children with simultaneous bilateral CIs. Furthermore, the latencies were prolonged from apical to basal channels along the cochlea in the two groups. In children with sequential CIs, the inter-implant interval was negatively correlated with the eV latency on the first CI side and was positively correlated with bilateral differences in the eIII and eV latencies. CONCLUSIONS: Unilateral CI use promotes the maturation of ipsilateral auditory conduction function. However, a longer inter-implant interval results in more unbalanced development of bilateral auditory brainstem pathways. Bilateral cochlear implantation with no or a short interval is recommended.

Efficacy and safety of chloral hydrate in auditory brainstem response test: A systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of chloral hydrate in auditory brainstem response (ABR) tests. SETTING AND DESIGN: In this study, the authors systematically searched both English (Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science) and Chinese (Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data, and VIP Chinese Science) databases. Two authors independently performed data extraction and quality assessment. The pooled sedation failure rate and the pooled incidence of adverse events were calculated via a random-effects model. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed to explore the sources of heterogeneity, and the PRISMA guideline was followed. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with ABR tests receiving chloral hydrate sedation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The pooled sedation failure rate and the pooled incidence of adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 23 clinical studies were included in the final analysis. The pooled sedation failure rate of patients who received chloral hydrate sedation before ABR examination was 10.0% [95% confidence interval (CI) (6.7%, 15.0%), I2 = 95%, p < .01]. There were significant differences in the prevalence of sedation failure between sample sizes greater than 200 and those less than or equal to 200 (5.6% vs. 19.6%, p < .01) and between the studies that reported sleep deprivation and those that did not report sleep deprivation (7.1% vs. 18.9%, p < .01). The pooled incidence of adverse events was 10.32% [95% CI (5.83%, 14.82%), I2 = 98.1%, p < .01]. CONCLUSIONS: Chloral hydrate has a high rate of sedation failure, adverse events, and potential carcinogenicity. Therefore, replacing its use in ABR tests with safer and more effective sedatives is warranted.

The impact of menopausal status on auditory brainstem responses.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of decreased estrogen levels due to menopause on auditory brainstem response measurements (ABR). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Academic. PATIENTS: Pre- and post-menopausal females (pre-M, post-M) and age-matched males. METHODS: ABR measurements of wave I, III, and V latencies, and interpeak latencies; amplitudes of waves I, III, V, and V/I ratio. OUTCOME MEASURE: Differences in ABR measurements between pre-M and post-M. RESULTS: 164 subjects (101 female and 64 male) were included. Post-M had significantly greater latencies (msec) than pre-M of wave V. Post-M had a significantly smaller wave I amplitude (uV) than pre-M. Post-M had a significantly higher wave V/I amplitude ratio than pre-M. Pre-M had significantly shorter latencies than young males for wave III, and wave V. Post-M had significantly shorter latencies than older males at wave III, and wave V. A two-way ANOVA revealed a significant interaction between the effects of age category and gender on V/I amplitude. CONCLUSION: Post-M group showed a significant drop in wave I amplitude compared with pre-M group, even in the absence of hearing loss, suggesting that the gender differences in hearing are related to estrogen signaling along the auditory pathway. If wave I amplitude changes between older and younger groups resulted from decreased peripheral hearing sensitivity, we would expect larger drops in amplitude in males since rates of presbycusis are higher. We observed much larger drops in wave I amplitude in females, which cannot be attributed to peripheral hearing loss. These results may assist in understanding gender differences in presbycusis and a possible protective effect of estrogen on the auditory system. Knowledge of gender differences in wave I may be important when ABR is used to assess possible synaptopathy.

A machine learning approach for prediction of auditory brain stem response in patients after head-and-neck radiation therapy.

Objective: The present study aimed to assess machine learning (ML) models according to radiomic features to predict ototoxicity using auditory brain stem responses (ABRs) in patients with radiation therapy (RT) for head-and-neck cancers. Materials and Methods: The ABR test was performed on 50 patients having head-and-neck RT. Radiomic features were extracted from the brain stem in computed tomography images to generate a radiomic signature. Moreover, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, the area under the curve, and mean cross-validation were used to evaluate six different ML models. Results: Out of 50 patients, 21 participants experienced ototoxicity. Furthermore, 140 radiomic features were extracted from the segmented area. Among the six ML models, the Random Forest method with 77% accuracy provided the best result. Conclusion: According to the ML approach, we showed the relatively high prediction power of the radiomic features in radiation-induced ototoxicity. To better predict the outcomes, future studies on a larger number of participants are recommended.

Utilização do Potencial Auditivo de Estado Estável em lactentes com baixo risco para perda auditiva / Use of Auditory Steady State Response in infants at low risk for hearing loss / Uso del potencial auditivo de estado estacionario en bebés con bajo riesgo de pérdida auditiva

Introdução: Com base na necessidade do diagnóstico audiológico e da intervenção precoce na vida de uma criança com perda auditiva, faz-se necessário a elaboração de protocolos de avaliação auditiva que forneçam o maior número de informações. Objetivo: Analisar um programa de saúde auditiva infantil com relação à adesão à triagem auditiva e procedimentos de diagnóstico. Metodologia: Pesquisa de caráter transversal com análise quantitativa. Realizado em três etapas: 1ª etapa: triagem auditiva de neonatos de alojamento conjunto; 2ª etapa: reteste das falhas; 3ª etapa: diagnóstico audiológico dos lactentes que falharam nas etapas anteriores com a utilização do Potencial Evocado Auditivo de Estado Estável (PEAEE) em conjunto com o Potencial Evocado Auditivo de Tronco Encefálico (PEATE). Resultados: Em 2019, 1.898 neonatos foram triados e destes, 287 (15.2%) falharam na primeira testagem em pelo menos uma orelha. Um total de 197 (10.3%) foram retestados e 14 (0,73%) falharam em pelo menos uma orelha. Dez (0,52%) neonatos retornaram para diagnóstico compondo uma amostra homogênea de neonatos nascidos a termo. Um neonato apresentou perda auditiva unilateral. O tempo necessário para coleta de dados no PEAEE foi de 20 minutos. Conclusão: O PEAEE pode ser considerado uma alternativa a ser utilizado na bateria de testes na avaliação audiológica infantil, juntamente com outros procedimentos, utilizando-se do princípio de verificação cruzada e adicionando uma informação valiosa, especialmente com relação às baixas frequências. (AU)

Introduction: Based on the need for audiological diagnosis and intervention as soon as possible in the life of a child with hearing loss, it is necessary to elaborate of hearing evaluation protocols with high efficiency, which provide the greatest amount of information. Aim: To analyze a pediatric hearing health program regarding their adherence to hearing screening, failure rates, and diagnostic procedures. Method: This is a cross-sectional, descriptive, quantitative study, and consisted of tree stages: Performed in three steps: 1st step: hearing screening of rooming-in neonates; 2nd stage: retest of failures; 3rd stage: audiological diagnosis of infants who failed in the previous stages using the Steady State Response (ASSR) together with the Brainstem Evoked Response Audiometry (BERA). Results: In 2019, 1,898 infants were submitted to the program, of whom 287 (15.2%) failed the screening in at least one of the ears. A total of 197 (10.3%) infants attended the retest and 14 (0.73%) failed the TOAE in at least one of the ears. Ten (0.52%) infants returned for diagnosis. The sample was homogeneously full-term children. One child showed unilateral HL. The average amount of time required to collect information in the ASSR was 20 minutes. Conclusion: For diagnosis, ASSR can be an alternative to be used in the battery of examinations in pediatric hearing assessment along with the other procedures, using the cross-check principle and adding valuable information, especially regarding the low frequencies. (AU)

Introducción: En base a la necesidad de diagnóstico audiológico e intervención lo antes posibles en la vida de un niño con pérdida auditiva, es necesario elaborar protocolos de evaluación auditiva de alta eficiencia, que proporcionan la mayor cantidad de información. Objetivo: Analizar un programa de salud auditiva infantil en cuanto a la adherencia al tamizaje auditivo, tasa de fracaso y procedimientos diagnósticos. Metodología: Investigación transversal con análisis cuantitativo, Realizado en tres pasos: 1er paso: tamizaje auditivo de los neonatos en alojamiento conjunto; 2ª etapa: retest de fallas; 3ª etapa: diagnóstico audiológico de los lactantes que fracasaron en las etapas anteriores utilizando el Potencial Evocado Auditivo de Estado Estacionario junto con el Potencial Evocado Auditivo de Tallo Cerebral. Resultados: Em 2019, se cribaron 1,898 neonatos y de estos, 287 (15,2%) no pasaron la primera prueba en al menos un oído. Un total de 197 (10,3) fueron reevaluados y 14 (0,73%) fallaron en al menos un oído. Diez (0,52%) neonatos regresaron para diagnóstico, conformando una muestra homogénea de neonatos a término, con una edad gestacional media de 39 semanas y dos días. Un neonato tuvo pérdida auditiva unilateral. El tiempo de recogida de los resultados en el ASSR fue de 20 min. Conclusión: Para el diagnóstico, la ASSR puede considerarse una alternativa para ser utilizada en la batería de pruebas en la evaluación audiológica infantil, junto con otros procedimientos, utilizando el principio de verificación cruzada y agregando información valiosa, especialmente en lo que se refiere a las bajas frecuencia. (AU)

Potenciales evocados auditivos de tronco en neonatos nacidos a gran altitud / Brainstem auditory evoked potentials in newborn infants born in a high-altitude area

Introducción. Una forma no invasiva y segura de evaluar los parámetros neurofisiológicos en recién nacidos es la evaluación de los potenciales evocados auditivos del tronco encefálico (PEAT). Objetivo. Evaluar las latencias e intervalos de ondas de los PEAT en neonatos sanos nacidos a gran altitud (Cusco, 3399 msnm). Población y métodos. Estudio transversal y prospectivo. Se incluyeron neonatos menores a 14 días de vida, dados de alta a menos de 7 días de nacidos, evaluados para determinar los valores de los PEAT a intensidades sonoras de 70 dB, 80 dB y 90 dB. Se incluyeron las variables edad gestacional, peso al nacer, tipo de parto. Se calcularon las diferencias de las medianas de las latencias e intervalos de las ondas según edad gestacional y peso al nacer. Resultados. Se evaluaron 96 neonatos (17 pretérminos). Las medianas de las latencias de las ondas I a V a 90 dB fueron las siguientes: onda I 1,56 ms; onda II 2,74 ms; onda III 4,37 ms; onda IV 5,62 ms, onda V 6,63 ms. La latencia de la onda I para 80 dB fue de 1,71 ms y para 70 dB de 1,88 ms. Los intervalos para las ondas (I-III), (III-V) y (I-V) fueron de 2,8 ms, 2,2 ms y 5,0 ms respectivamente, sin diferencias entre intensidades (p >0,05). La prematuridad y el bajo peso estuvieron asociados a latencias de la onda I más prolongadas (p <0,05). Conclusiones. Se presentan valores ajustados de latencias e intervalos de los PEAT en neonatos nacidos a gran altitud. Se identificó que, a distintas intensidades sonoras, se ven diferencias en las latencias de las ondas, pero no en los intervalos entre ondas.

Introduction. A non-invasive and safe way to assess neurophysiological parameters in newborn infants is the evaluation of brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs). Objective. To assess the latencies and wave intervals of BAEPs in healthy newborn infants born in a high-altitude area (Cusco, 3399 MASL). Population and methods. Cross-sectional and prospective study. Newborn infants younger than 14 days of age, discharged less than 7 days after birth, were assessed to determine BAEP values at intensities of 70 dB, 80 dB, and 90 dB. The study variables were gestational age, birth weight, and type of delivery. The median differences in wave latencies and intervals were estimated according to gestational age and birth weight. Results. A total of 96 newborn infants (17 preterm infants) were assessed. The median latencies of waves I­V at 90 dB were for wave I: 1.56 ms, wave II: 2,74 ms, wave III: 4.37 ms, wave IV: 5.62 ms, and wave V: 6.63 ms. The latency of wave I for 80 dB was 1.71 ms and for 70 dB, 1.88 ms. Wave intervals (I­III, III­V, I­V) were 2.8 ms, 2.2 ms, and 5.0 ms, respectively, without differences among intensities (p > 0.05). Prematurity and low birth weight were associated with a longer wave I latency (p < 0.05). Conclusions. Here we describe adjusted BAEP latency and interval values for newborn infants born at high altitude. At different sound intensities, we identified differences in wave latencies, but not in interwave intervals.