Use of thioglycolate broth as a pre-analytic transport medium in the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate whether adding tissue samples directly into thioglycolate (TG) broth yielded a greater number of anaerobic organisms than freshly sampled tissue in suspected hip and knee prosthetic joint infections (PJIs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2017 and December 2020, a total of 90 patients (46 males, 44 females; median age: 71.7 years; range, 50.8 and 87.8 years) who underwent revision hip or knee arthroplasty were included. Intraoperative samples were taken, with five placed in TG broth and five in standard containers (PC) with subsequent aerobic and anaerobic culturing conducted. Demographic and baseline data of the patients were recorded. The primary outcome was positive bacterial growth from a PJI specimen inoculated directly into TG broth at the time of collection or standard PJI specimen processing. Secondary outcomes investigated were the presence of Cutibacterium acnes (C. acnes) and the curative success of revision procedure. RESULTS: A total of 900 samples (450 PC and 450 TG) were taken from 90 revision arthroplasty patients (47 knees and 43 hips). There was no statistically significant difference in the number of positive bacterial growth samples between TG broth and standard processing (p=0.742). This was consistent with subgroup analysis analyzing C. acnes (p=0.666). CONCLUSION: In hip and knee arthroplasty, there is no benefit in substituting or adding TG broth as a culture medium to better identify both general bacterial species and C. acnes infections specifically. However, the use of TG may be useful in confirming a true positive result for infection.

The Value of Preoperative Ultrasound-Determined Fluid Film and Joint Aspiration in Revision Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Data regarding the diagnostic value of ultrasound (US)-determined fluid film and joint aspiration prior to revision total hip arthroplasty for suspected periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are limited. This study aimed to analyze the value of US-determined fluid film, characterized the preoperative and intraoperative microbiological spectrum and resistance patterns, and compared the concordance between preoperative synovial fluid and intraoperative culture results. METHODS: We analyzed 366 US examinations from 324 patients prior to revision total hip arthroplasty. Selected cases were grouped into clearly infected, noninfected, and inconclusive cohorts, according to the International Consensus Meeting 2018 Criteria. For US-determined fluid film <1 mm, no aspiration was performed based on our institutional protocol. Patients were grouped into no aspiration (144 of 366; [39.3%]), dry tap (21 of 366; [5.7%]), and a successful tap (201 of 366; [54.9%]). The microbiological spectrum and antibiograms were compared between preoperative and intraoperative results. RESULTS: The absence of US-determined fluid film showed no correlation with the presence of a hip PJI. Overall, 31.9% cases of the no-aspiration group had a PJI. In total, 13.5% discrepancies were found between successful taps and intraoperative cultures. The most prevalent microorganisms in preoperative synovial fluid were Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus (20.8%), while intraoperatively S. epidermidis (26.3%) and Cutibacterium acnes (14.5%) were leading. Additional microorganisms were identified in 32.5% of intraoperative cultures. There were no differences between resistance patterns of preoperative and intraoperative concordant microorganisms. CONCLUSIONS: Absence of US-determined fluid film cannot rule out the presence of a hip PJI. Combined microbiological results from hip US aspirations and subsequent surgical procedures are crucial to design an effective treatment for suspected hip PJI.

Trends in Revision Hip Arthroplasty for Prosthetic Joint Infection: A Single-Center Study of 423 Hips at a High-Volume Center Between 2008 and 2021.

BACKGROUND: Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of the most devastating complications after total hip arthroplasty (THA), and comorbidities increase the risk. We examined whether there was a temporal change in the demographics, especially regarding comorbidities, of patients who have PJIs and were treated over a 13-year study period at a high-volume academic joint arthroplasty center. In addition, the surgical methods used and the microbiology of the PJIs were assessed. METHODS: Revisions (n = 423, 418 patients) due to PJI of the hip performed at our institution between 2008 and September 2021 were identified. All included PJIs fulfilled the 2013 International Consensus Meeting diagnostic criteria. The surgeries were categorized into one of the following categories: debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention, 1-stage revision, and 2-stage revision. Infections were classified as early, acute hematogenous, and chronic infections. RESULTS: There was no change in the median age of the patients, but the proportion of ASA-class 4 patients increased from 10.5% to 20%. The incidence of early infections increased from 0.11 per 100 primary THAs in 2008 to 1.09 in 2021. The incidence of 1-stage revisions increased the most, rising from 0.10 per 100 primary THAs in 2010 to 0.91 per 100 primary THAs in 2021. Furthermore, the proportion of infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus increased from 26.3% in 2008 to 2009 to 40% in 2020 to 2021. CONCLUSION: The comorbidity burden of PJI patients increased during the study period. This increase may present a treatment challenge, as comorbidities are known to have a negative effect on PJI treatment outcomes.

Cutibacterium Positive Cultures in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Contaminant or Pathogen?

BACKGROUND: Cutibacterium spp. is an emerging pathogen in total hip arthroplasty (THA) that is not well evaluated in the literature. This study reported on the presentation and management of THA complicated by positive intraoperative Cutibacterium cultures. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of 27 revision THAs with positive monomicrobial intraoperative Cutibacterium cultures from 2014 to 2020 at one academic center. These patients were divided into two cohorts based on meeting Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria for prosthetic joint infections (PJI). Patient demographics, preoperative labs, and hip aspirate results were collected. Procedure performed, postoperative antibiotic regimens, and repeat infections were recorded. Data were compared with univariate analysis. RESULTS: Nine of the 27 patients preoperatively met MSIS criteria for PJI. Patients with positive MSIS criteria had significantly higher median synovial cell count (P = .048) and neutrophil percentage in a preoperative aspirate (P = .050). Eight patients with positive MSIS criteria received six weeks of postoperative antibiotics compared to two patients with negative criteria. Two patients with positive MSIS criteria had a postoperative infection that required further surgical intervention. Four patients with negative criteria who required further surgical intervention did not receive postoperative antibiotics after initial revision. CONCLUSION: While often categorized as a contaminant, Cutibacterium is an increasingly recognized pathogen in THA. Cutibacterium can often present with normal serology, which may result in misdiagnosis as aseptic THA failure. Without the administration of postoperative antibiotics after positive cultures, there is a risk for persistent infection requiring further surgical intervention.

Diagnosis of Chronic Infection at Total Hip Arthroplasty Revision Is a Question of Definition.

PURPOSE: Contradicting definitions of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) are in use. Joint aspiration is performed before total hip arthroplasty (THA) revision. This study investigated the influence of PJI definition on PJI prevalence at THA revision. Test quality of prerevision aspiration was evaluated for the different PJI definitions. METHODS: 256 THA revisions were retrospectively classified to be infected or not infected. Classification was performed according to the 4 different definitions proposed by the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS), the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), the International Consensus Meeting (ICM), and the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS). Only chronic PJIs were included. RESULTS: PJI prevalence at revision significantly correlated with the applied PJI definition (p = 0.01, Cramer's V = 0.093). PJI prevalence was 20.7% for the MSIS, 25.4% for the ICM, 28.1% for the IDSA, and 32.0% for the EBJIS definition. For synovial fluid white blood cell count, the best ROC-AUC for predicting PJI was 0.953 in combination with the MSIS definition. CONCLUSION: PJI definition significantly influences the rate of diagnosed PJIs at THA revision. Synovial fluid white blood cell count is a reliable means to rule out PJI. In cases with a borderline high synovial white blood cell count before THA revision as the only sign of chronic PJI, an extended diagnostic work-up should be considered.

Synovial Fluid-Induced Aggregation Occurs across Staphylococcus aureus Clinical Isolates and is Mechanistically Independent of Attached Biofilm Formation.

Rapid synovial fluid-induced aggregation of Staphylococcus aureus is currently being investigated as an important factor in the establishment of periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs). Pathogenic advantages of aggregate formation have been well documented in vitro, including recalcitrance to antibiotics and protection from host immune defenses. The objective of the present work was to determine the strain dependency of synovial fluid-induced aggregation by measuring the degree of aggregation of 21 clinical S. aureus isolates cultured from either PJI or bloodstream infections using imaging and flow cytometry. Furthermore, by measuring attached bacterial biomass using a conventional crystal violet assay, we assessed whether there is a correlation between the aggregative phenotype and surface-associated biofilm formation. While all of the isolates were stimulated to aggregate upon exposure to bovine synovial fluid (BSF) and human serum (HS), the extent of aggregation was highly variable between individual strains. Interestingly, the PJI isolates aggregated significantly more upon BSF exposure than those isolated from bloodstream infections. While we were able to stimulate biofilm formation with all of the isolates in growth medium, supplementation with either synovial fluid or human serum inhibited bacterial surface attachment over a 24 h incubation. Surprisingly, there was no correlation between the degree of synovial fluid-induced aggregation and quantity of surface-associated biofilm as measured by a conventional biofilm assay without host fluid supplementation. Taken together, our findings suggest that synovial fluid-induced aggregation appears to be widespread among S. aureus strains and mechanistically independent of biofilm formation. IMPORTANCE Bacterial infections of hip and knee implants are rare but devastating complications of orthopedic surgery. Despite a widespread appreciation of the considerable financial, physical, and emotional burden associated with the development of a prosthetic joint infection, the establishment of bacteria in the synovial joint remains poorly understood. It has been shown that immediately upon exposure to synovial fluid, the viscous fluid in the joint, Staphylococcus aureus rapidly forms aggregates which are resistant to antibiotics and host immune cell clearance. The bacterial virulence associated with aggregate formation is likely a step in the establishment of prosthetic joint infection, and as such, it has the potential to be a potent target of prevention. We hope that this work contributes to the future development of therapeutics targeting synovial fluid-induced aggregation to better prevent and treat these infections.

Prevalence and Outcomes of Unexpected Positive Intraoperative Cultures in Presumed Aseptic Revision Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence and outcomes of unexpected positive cultures (UPCs) of specimens taken during presumed aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) are unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of UPC and infection-free implant survival in this patient population. Secondary aims included identifying factors associated with subsequent infection-related failure in patients with UPC. METHODS: We reviewed all THA revisions (n = 2,288) performed at our institution from 2006 to 2019. Presumed aseptic revision THAs with intraoperative culture(s) were eligible (n = 1,196), and those with UPC were included in a Kaplan-Meier analysis to determine the infection-free implant survival and in Cox regression analysis to identify factors associated with infection-related failure. RESULTS: UPC(s) were documented for 9.2% (110) of 1,196 aseptic THA revisions. The 2- and 5-year infection-free implant survival in the entire UPC cohort was 93.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 90.5% to 95.7%) and 86.8% (95% CI = 82.9% to 90.7%), respectively. The 2- and 5-year infection-free survival with failure due to infection with the same microorganism as identified in the UPC as the end point was 95.8% (95% CI = 93.7% to 97.9%) and 94.3% (95% CI = 91.7% to 96.9%), respectively. Subsequent infection-related failures caused by the same microorganism as identified in the UPC were more likely to occur after revisions with ≥2 UPCs than after those with 1 UPC (p = 0.024). Revision due to adverse metal reaction was a risk factor for subsequent infection-related failure (hazard ratio [HR] = 14.49, 95% CI = 2.69 to 78.04). Patients with a single UPC who were not treated with antibiotics had no subsequent periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) caused by the same microorganism as identified in the UPC. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of UPC was 9.2%, and the infection-free implant survival in patients with UPC is encouraging. Implant survival free of PJI caused by the same microorganism as identified in the UPC was excellent. Aseptic revision for adverse metal reaction was a risk factor for subsequent PJI in patients with UPC. No patient with a single UPC who was not treated with antibiotics developed PJI caused by the UPC-identified microorganism, suggesting that in the absence of other signs of infection a single UPC does not warrant antibiotic treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Prosthetic hip joint infection by Bacillus Calmette-Guerin therapy following intravesical instillation for bladder cancer identified using whole-genome sequencing: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Joint replacement is an effective intervention and prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of the most serious complications of such surgery. Diagnosis of PJI is often complex and requires multiple modalities of investigation. We describe a rare cause of PJI which highlights these challenges and the role of whole-genome sequencing to achieve a rapid microbiological diagnosis to facilitate prompt and appropriate management. CASE PRESENTATION: A 79-year-old man developed chronic hip pain associated with a soft-tissue mass, fluid collection and sinus adjacent to his eight-year-old hip prosthesis. His symptoms started after intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) therapy for bladder cancer. Synovasure™ and 16S polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests were negative, but culture of the periarticular mass and genome sequencing diagnosed BCG infection. He underwent a two-stage joint revision and a prolonged duration of antibiotic therapy which was curative. CONCLUSIONS: BCG PJI after therapeutic exposure can have serious consequences, and awareness of this potential complication, identified from patient history, is essential. In addition, requesting appropriate testing is required, together with recognition that traditional diagnostics may be negative in non-pyogenic PJI. Advanced molecular techniques have a role to enhance the timely management of these infections.

Comparative genomics of Staphylococcus epidermidis from prosthetic-joint infections and nares highlights genetic traits associated with antimicrobial resistance, not virulence.

There is increased awareness of the worldwide spread of specific epidemic multidrug-resistant (MDR) lineages of the human commensal Staphylococcus epidermidis. Here, using bioinformatic analyses accounting for population structure, we determined genomic traits (genes, SNPs and k-mers) that distinguish S. epidermidis causing prosthetic-joint infections (PJIs) from commensal isolates from nares, by analysing whole-genome sequencing data from S. epidermidis from PJIs prospectively collected over 10 years in Sweden, and contemporary S. epidermidis from the nares of patients scheduled for arthroplasty surgery. Previously suggested virulence determinants and the presence of genes and mutations linked to antimicrobial resistance (AMR) were also investigated. Publicly available S. epidermidis sequences were used for international extrapolation and validation of findings. Our data show that S. epidermidis causing PJIs differed from nasal isolates not by virulence but by traits associated with resistance to compounds used in prevention of PJIs: ß-lactams, aminoglycosides and chlorhexidine. Almost a quarter of the PJI isolates did not belong to any of the previously described major nosocomial lineages, but the AMR-related traits were also over-represented in these isolates, as well as in international S. epidermidis isolates originating from PJIs. Genes previously associated with virulence in S. epidermidis were over-represented in individual lineages, but failed to reach statistical significance when adjusted for population structure. Our findings suggest that the current strategies for prevention of PJIs select for nosocomial MDR S. epidermidis lineages that have arisen from horizontal gene transfer of AMR-related traits into multiple genetic backgrounds.

Severe polymicrobial and fungal periprosthetic osteomyelitis persisting after hip disarticulations treated with caspofungin in risk patients: a case series.

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic fungal infections are considered rare and opportunistic infections. Treatment is difficult, and established standards do not yet exist. The choice of the appropriate antifungal drug might affect the patient outcome. CASES: All the three cases presented showed polybacterial recurrent infection of the revision hip arthroplasty. All patients were of younger age, had multiple revisions of the endoprosthesis, each had a large partial femoral replacement greater than 40% of the femoral length, gentamycin-loaded cement, and a long anchoring distance of the used intramedullary stem. Due to the severe life-threatening infection with deep osteomyelitis, an amputation had to be performed. However, despite surgical intervention, the fungal dominated infection persisted. Finally, only the use of caspofungin allowed permanent infection control. CONCLUSION: The polybacterial infection is driven by the symbiosis between fungi and bacteria. Therefore, eradication of the fungus is required to achieve elimination of the bacteria. Antimycotics of the echinocandin-class, such as caspofungin, may be considered as initial treatment.

Candidal Prosthetic Hip Infection in a Patient with Previous Candidal Sepsis - A Case Report.

A 60 year-old woman with hip dysplasia battled with duodenal cancer that was complicated with Candida tropicalis sepsis. Two years later, the patient underwent a total hip arthroplasty (THA). She complained of a persisting low-grade fever and local heat on the THA scar. Arthrocentesis of the hip was performed and the Candida tropicalis was detected. Debridement and polyethylene liner/modular head exchange were performed 28 days after the primary THA. Fluconazole was administrated for one year. The patient reported no symptoms five years later. It was found that periprosthetic infection could be prevented by implant preservation surgery.

The diagnostic value of routine preliminary biopsy in diagnosing late prosthetic joint infection after hip and knee arthroplasty.

AIMS: Biopsy of the periprosthetic tissue is an important diagnostic tool for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) as it enables the detection of the responsible microorganism with its sensitivity to antibiotics. We aimed to investigate how often the bacteria identified in the tissue analysis differed between samples obtained from preoperative biopsy and intraoperative revision surgery in cases of late PJI; and whether there was a therapeutic consequence. METHODS: A total of 508 patients who required revision surgery of total hip arthroplasty (THA) (n = 231) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) (n = 277) because of component loosening underwent biopsy before revision surgery. The tissue samples collected at biopsy and during revision surgery were analyzed according to the criteria of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS). RESULTS: In total, 178 (113 THA, 65 TKA) were classified as infected. The biopsy procedure had a sensitivity of 93.8%, a specificity of 97.3%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 94.9%, a negative predictive value (NPV) of 96.7%, and an accuracy of 96.1%. Of the 178 infected patients, 26 showed a difference in the detected bacteria from the biopsy and the revision surgery (14.6%). This difference required a change to antibiotic therapy in only two cases (1.1%). CONCLUSION: Biopsy is a useful tool to diagnose PJI, but there may be a difference in the detected bacteria between the biopsy and revision surgery. However, this did not affect the choice of antibiotic therapy in most cases, rendering the clinical relevance of this phenomenon as low. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(3):329-335.

Delayed total hip arthroplasty infection with Mycobacterium Tuberculosis complex.

Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) joint infection is an uncommon (0,3-1,7%) (20) but devastating complication after THA. While mostly caused by Gram-positive bacteria, with staphylococci and streptococci accounting for up to 76% of cases (21), orthopaedic surgeons are sometimes faced with atypical germs such as fungi or mycobacteria. We present a case of THA joint infection caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MT) in a patient without a previous history of MT infection. A literature review was performed, and the treatment is discussed.

Candida periprosthetic infection of the hip: a systematic review of surgical treatments and clinical outcomes.

PURPOSE: To produce a systematic analysis of types of treatment and outcomes of Candida hip periprosthetic joint infections and their correlation with specific pathogen species. METHODS: During June 2018, a literature search of candida periprosthetic hip infection in PubMed, Scopus and Embase databases was performed according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guideline. Reviewers used Oxford level of evidence (LoE) and methodological index for non-randomised studies (MINORS) score. Modal distribution of surgical, pharmacological treatment and outcome along with the correlation between types of treatment and outcomes was calculated through the chi-square test. RESULTS: Seventy-nine cases were collected through 35 articles, identifying 81 pathogens. Candida albicans was the most common pathogen. Analysis of LoE reveals 26 LoE 5 (74.29%) and nine LoE 4 (26.71%). From nine  LoE 4, ten patients (20.41%) underwent one-stage revision, 22 patients (44.90%) two-stage revision, 11 patients (22.45%) resection arthroplasty and six patients (12.24%) debridement with prosthesis retention. Global success was obtained in 31 cases (63.27%). Modal distribution revealed a preference for two-stage revision (22/49) and fluconazole as medical therapy (36/49). A significant difference was found between one-stage revision and resection arthroplasty (p = 0.031) or debridement (p = 0.003) and between two-stage revision and debridement (p = 0.013). No differences were found between Candida spp. in terms of the outcomes (p = 0.736). Methodological index showed a poor MINOR score. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of the literature suggests better clinical outcome with one- or two-stage revision than with resection arthroplasty or debridement, but the level of evidence is low.

Periprosthetic joint infection in aseptic total hip arthroplasty revision.

PURPOSE: There is no consensus regarding systematic screening for infection in aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). The rationale for systematic intra-operative samples is to increase the sensitivity of latent infections detection, which may require specific treatment. However, the incidence of occult infection in revision THAs is not precisely known. As such, the aim of the study was to evaluate the incidence of occult infection in presumed aseptic revision THAs and identify associated risk factors. METHOD: Bacteriological samples from 523 aseptic THA revisions performed for five years were analyzed. Revisions performed for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) or clinical suspicion of PJI were excluded. Microbiological cultures were performed using tissue samples in 505 cases (97%), synovial fluid in blood culture vials in 158 (30%), and in dry tubes in 263 (50%). Implants were sent for sonication in 12 cases (2.6%). The mean number of microbiological samples per patient was 3.6 (range, 1-15). Histology samples were collected for 300 patients (57%). RESULTS: The incidence of occult infection was 7% (36 cases) and contamination 8% (42 cases). Among occult infections, the primary reasons for revision were dislocation (42%), aseptic loosening (25%), fracture (19%), and others (14%). The infection rate in the dislocation group was significantly higher than that of other reasons for revision (p < 0.001). Among the patients determined with PJI, the revision THA was performed less than a year after primary in 19 (53%). CONCLUSION: The incidence of occult PJI justifies systematic intraoperative sampling. A short time between primary arthroplasty and revision or an early postoperative dislocation is a factor to suspect infections.

Comparison of D-dimer with CRP and ESR for diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection.

BACKGROUND: Despite the availability of several biomarkers, the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) continues to be challenging. Serum D-dimer assessment is a widely available test that detects fibrinolytic activities and has been reported as an inflammatory biomarker. However, quite a few articles have reported the diagnostic efficiency of D-dimer for PJI. METHODS: This prospective study enrolled patients who had undergone total joint arthroplasty, were suspected of PJI, and also prepared for revision arthroplasty. PJI was defined using the Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria. In all patients, serum D-dimer level, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reactive protein (CRP) level were measured preoperatively. We then compared the diagnostic efficiency of these three biomarkers. RESULTS: The median D-dimer level was significantly higher (p < 0.001) for the patients with PJI than for the patients with aseptic failure. With a sensitivity of 80.77% (95% CI, 65.62 to 95.92%) and a specificity of 79.63% (95% CI, 68.89 to 90.37%), the diagnostic efficiency of D-dimer did not outperform serum CRP (with a sensitivity of 84.61% and specificity of 64.81%) and ESR (with a sensitivity of 73.08% and specificity of 90.47%). CONCLUSIONS: Serum D-dimer as a marker for the diagnosis of PJI still requires more large-scale and detailed clinical trials.

Two-stage revision and systemic antifungal therapy of Candida glabrata primary prosthetic hip infection successfully treated: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Overall, fungi are estimated to cause approximately 1% of prosthetic joint infections, Candida glabrata account for less than 10% of these cases. No well-defined treatment strategy is available. CASE PRESENTATION: A 71-year-old Caucasian man with non-insulin-dependent diabetes was admitted for hip prosthesis revision. For the past 17 years he suffered from recurrent infection of a perianal fistula, the last episode being 1 week before admission, and was prescribed amoxicillin/clavulanate 1 g twice a day. At surgery, the synovial fluid tested positive for infection with the Synovasure® Alpha Defensin Test, and the orthopedic surgeon reported intraoperative evidence of infection. While the synovial fluid failed to grow microorganisms, seven different samples including periprosthetic tissue and the prosthesis grew Candida glabrata. Imipenem 2 g and teicoplanin 600 mg daily were administered during surgery. Also an antibiotic loaded spacer was positioned. A week later micafungin 100 mg a day was added, and after another week imipenem was replaced with ertapenem 1 g once a day. The combination of antibiotics and antifungal was administered for a total of 7 weeks, while he also underwent treatment of the perianal fistula. The reimplantation was performed after an 8-week antibiotic-free interval. Before reimplantation, his erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein level were normal. At reimplant surgery, several samples were collected for microbiology, before administering ertapenem 1 g, teicoplanin 600 mg and micafungin 100 mg once a day. This antimicrobial combination was continued for 15 days until the microbiologic investigations, including culture and molecular testing after sonication technique of the spacer, were reported negative for bacteria and fungi. In this patient, systemic antifungal and extensive debridement allowed for clinical and microbiologic cure. CONCLUSIONS: Although Candida glabrata prosthetic joint infection is a rare event, the incidence could increase in the future, and there is need for more definitive treatment protocols. Diagnosis depends on culture. Fungal etiology must always be included in the differential diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection.

Plasma fibrinogen may predict persistent infection before reimplantation in two-stage exchange arthroplasty for periprosthetic hip infection.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of persistent infection before reimplantation in two-stage exchange arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains challenging. Currently, several studies suggested coagulation-related markers, such as D-dimer and fibrinogen, may be promising in diagnose of PJI. The purpose of the study was to investigate the predictive values of plasma D-dimer and fibrinogen for assessment of persistent infection before reimplantation hip arthroplasty. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 129 hips that treated with two-stage exchange arthroplasty for PJI from 2012 to 2016 in our institution. The persistent infection before reimplantation was based on a modified Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria. After exclusion, 102 hips were included in the final analysis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to determine the prognostic value of plasma D-dimer and fibrinogen in predicting persistent infection before reimplantation. RESULTS: The area the under ROC curves (AUC) for fibrinogen (0.773; 95% confidential interval [CI], 0.569-0.905) was significantly higher than that of D-dimer (0.565; 95% CI, 0.329-0.777). With the calculated threshold of fibrinogen set at 3.61 g/L, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) was 87.5%, 62.8%, 16.7%, and 98.3%, respectively. With the threshold value of D-dimer set at 0.82 µg/mL, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV was 83.3%, 41.9%, 21.7%, and 92.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the current study reveals that the plasma fibrinogen may be a promising biomarker in predicting persistent infection before reimplantation. Further prospective studies with larger cohorts are needed to validate predictive values and optimal thresholds of coagulation-related markers.

High cure rate of periprosthetic hip joint infection with multidisciplinary team approach using standardized two-stage exchange.

BACKGROUND: Two-stage exchange arthroplasty is still the preferred treatment choice for chronic PJI. However, the results remain unpredictable. We analyzed the treatment success of patients with an infected hip prosthesis, who were treated according to a standardized algorithm with a multidisciplinary team approach and evaluated with a strict definition of failure. METHODS: In this single-center prospective cohort study, all hip PJI episodes from March 2013 to May 2015 were included. Treatment failure was assessed according to the Delphi-based consensus definition. The Kaplan-Meier survival method was used to estimate the probability of infection-free survival. Patients were dichotomized into two groups depending on the number of previous septic revisions, duration of prosthesis-free interval, positive culture with difficult-to-treat microorganisms, microbiology at explantation, and microbiology at reimplantation. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients with hip PJI were the subject of this study. The most common isolated microorganisms were coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) followed by Staphylococcus aureus and Propionibacterium. Almost half of the study cohort (46%) had at least one previous septic revision before admission. The Kaplan-Meier estimated infection-free survival after 3 years was 89.3% (95% CI, 80% to 94%) with 30 patients at risk. The mean follow-up was 33.1 months (range, 24-48 months) with successful treatment of PJI. There were no statistical differences in infect eradication rate among the dichotomized groups. CONCLUSIONS: High infect eradication rates were achieved in a challenging cohort using a standardized two-stage exchange supported by a multidisciplinary approach.