Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 251
Filtrar
1.
World J Urol ; 42(1): 562, 2024 Oct 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39367976

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To describe the clinical presentation and urodynamic findings in detrusor underactivity (DU) patients and investigate the association between DU and straining related complications such as pelvic organ prolapse (POP), inguinal hernia, and hemorrhoids. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all consecutive patients who underwent urodynamic studies (UDS) from 2012 to 2023, divided into two groups: those with evidence of DU (n = 573), and control subjects with normal voiding parameters (n = 522). Exclusion criteria were patients who lacked sufficient data, those with obstructive voiding parameters, and those who had received intravesical botulinum toxin injections within the previous nine months. Demographic information, clinical presentation, straining related complications, and UDS findings were compared between the two groups using univariate statistical analysis. RESULTS: The male DU group had a statistically significant higher prevalence of spinal disease and previous cerebrovascular accidents, while the female DU group had a statistically significant higher prevalence of spinal disease, multiple sclerosis, diabetes, previous colorectal surgery, previous transabdominal gynecological surgery, POP surgery, and recurrent UTIs. Female DU patients had a higher prevalence of pronounced vaginal bulging symptoms, recurrent POP, inguinal hernia, and hemorrhoids. The predominant LUTS were voiding symptoms (81.2% in males and 77.9% in females), followed closely by storage symptoms (66.2% in males and 74.7% in females). The median Qmax, PdetQmax, and PVR were 6 ml/sec, 18 cmH2O, 190 ml for male DU patients, and 8 ml/sec, 11 cmH2O, and 200 ml for female DU patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Risk factors for DU that were identified include age, neurological diseases (spinal disease, CVA in men, MS in women), diabetes and transabdominal surgery (colorectal, gynecological) that can cause pelvic denervation in women. DU patients commonly present with both voiding and storage symptoms. There is approximately twice the risk of having POP surgery and inguinal hernia, an eight-fold risk of hemorrhoids, and a three-fold risk of recurrent UTIs for females. This is thought to be secondary to increased intra-abdominal pressure during urinary straining.


Asunto(s)
Vejiga Urinaria de Baja Actividad , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Vejiga Urinaria de Baja Actividad/fisiopatología , Vejiga Urinaria de Baja Actividad/etiología , Adulto , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/complicaciones , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/epidemiología , Hernia Inguinal/cirugía , Hernia Inguinal/complicaciones , Hernia Inguinal/epidemiología , Hemorroides/complicaciones , Urodinámica , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/etiología , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/fisiopatología
2.
Maturitas ; 189: 108090, 2024 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39178606

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the risk of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) after hysterectomy for benign conditions. STUDY DESIGN: This nationwide retrospective cohort study, utilizing data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service database, compared women aged 40 to 59 who underwent benign hysterectomy between 2002 and 2011 (hysterectomy group) with those who had national medical examinations during the same period (nonhysterectomy group). The analysis used a 1:1 propensity score matching method adjusted for variables. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Incident POP. RESULTS: The final sample of 32,984 participants (16,492 in each group) had a median age of 47 years [45-50] (p-value 0.305) and a median follow-up of 11.4 years [10-13.3] (p-value 0.189). The incidence of POP was 0.5 % in the nonhysterectomy group and 0.6 % in the hysterectomy group. Hysterectomy was associated with an increased risk of POP that required surgery or pessary use (hazard ratio [HR] 1.403, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.026-1.919). Subtotal hysterectomy was not associated with an increased risk of POP (HR 1.868, 95 % CI, 0.624-5.593), while total hysterectomy was associated with an increased risk (HR 1.633, 95 % CI, 1.083-2.46). Laparoscopic surgery was not associated with an increased risk of POP (HR 0.611, 95 % CI 0.311-1.202). CONCLUSIONS: The study found that, overall, hysterectomy is linked to a higher risk of POP, but subtotal hysterectomy and laparoscopy are not associated with increased risk, while total hysterectomy is associated with a higher risk.


Asunto(s)
Histerectomía , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico , Humanos , Femenino , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/cirugía , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/epidemiología , Histerectomía/efectos adversos , Histerectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Histerectomía/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , República de Corea/epidemiología , Adulto , Factores de Riesgo , Incidencia , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Puntaje de Propensión , Pesarios , Bases de Datos Factuales
3.
Pan Afr Med J ; 47: 52, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38646133

RESUMEN

Introduction: pelvic organ prolapse is a dynamic pathology that can worsen or regress especially postpartum and is the basis of several disorders that bother the patient and alter her quality of life. This study aims to determine the epidemiological, clinical, and therapeutic profile of pelvic organ prolapse in the town of Kananga. Methods: this is a cross-sectional study of cases of pelvic organ prolapse recorded during the mass campaign organized in the Bon-Berger Hospital of Tshikaji and Saint Georges Hospital of Katoka in the town of Kananga, from January 1 to July 31, 2023. Non-probability convenience sampling was used to select cases. Results: we recorded 138 cases of prolapse out of 572 patients. The prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse is 24.12% with an average monthly incidence of 19.71 (SD: 4.23) cases per month. The prevalence of recurrence of pelvic organ prolapse is 8.69%. The average age of patients is 54.86 (SD: 11.36) years with an average parity of 7.62 (SD: 1.8) deliveries. Its preoperative symptomatology consists of the intravaginal mass associated with digestive and urinary disorders in 97.00% (n=130), stage III hysterocele predominates in 68.70% (n=92), surgical treatment is the most practiced in 91.79% (n=123) and hysterectomy associated with the treatment of cystocele and rectocele by vaginal surgical access is the most practiced in 80.60% (n=108). Conclusion: pelvic organ prolapse is a real public health problem in the city of Kananga, its symptoms are classic and its treatment is surgical via the vaginal route.


Asunto(s)
Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , República Democrática del Congo/epidemiología , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Prevalencia , Anciano , Incidencia , Calidad de Vida , Recurrencia , Adulto Joven
4.
Urogynecology (Phila) ; 30(9): 753-757, 2024 Sep 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38624027

RESUMEN

IMPORTANCE: Since transvaginal mesh (VM) kits for apical pelvic organ prolapse (APOP) were labeled "high-risk" in 2016 and subsequently banned in 2019 by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the most common remaining surgical options include abdominal mesh-augmented sacrocolpopexy (AS) and transvaginal native tissue suspension (VN). OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine temporal trends in APOP procedures for urologists and gynecologists. STUDY DESIGN: Between 2011 and 2020, the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for AS, VM, and VN. RESULTS: There were 26,477 cases of APOP repair (32% AS, 6% VM, 62% VN) included, 9% by urologists. Urologists operated on older (65 vs 61 years) patients with more medical comorbidities. Urologists performed significantly higher proportion of AS (65% vs 29%) and VM (8% vs 6%) relative to VN (27% vs 65%) than gynecologists ( P < 0.0001). Transvaginal mesh utilization has decreased over time for both specialties ( P < 0.05); nonsignificant trends toward increasing AS ( P = 0.1646) in urologists and VN ( P = 0.0913) in gynecologists concurrently occurred. Significant independent predictors of the operating surgeon being a urologist were surgery being performed in the latter half of the cohort (2016-2020; odds ratio [OR], 1.22), non-White patient race (OR < 1 for all), a concomitant sling being placed (OR = 0.89), the surgery being VM (OR = 2.95) or AS (OR = 4.36), the patient being older (OR > 1 for each age range), and having a higher frailty index score (OR = 1.16). CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences in APOP repair choices exist between specialties. Urologists operate on older, more medically complex patients while demonstrating a strong preference for mesh-augmented compared with transvaginal native tissue repairs.


Asunto(s)
Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico , Mallas Quirúrgicas , Humanos , Femenino , Mallas Quirúrgicas/tendencias , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/cirugía , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Ginecología/tendencias , Vagina/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/tendencias , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Urología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
5.
Urogynecology (Phila) ; 30(3): 345-351, 2024 03 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38484252

RESUMEN

IMPORTANCE: This study identifies how neighborhood-level socioeconomic status (SES) may affect patients' treatment decisions for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the association of neighborhood-level SES with the decision of surgical versus conservative POP management. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients newly diagnosed with POP at a tertiary medical center between 2015 and 2021. Patients lost to follow-up or poor surgical candidates were excluded. Patient characteristics, demographics, and treatment selection were abstracted from the electronic health record. Conservative management was defined as expectant, pessary, and/or pelvic floor physical therapy. Five-digit zip codes were linked to the Area Deprivation Index and used as a surrogate for neighborhood-level SES. Area Deprivation Indices were dichotomized at or below the sample median (less disadvantaged area) and above the sample median (more disadvantaged area). Logistic regression models estimated the odds of choosing surgical versus conservative management as a function of the Area Deprivation Index. RESULTS: A total of 459 patients met the eligibility criteria (non-Hispanic White, 88.2%). The median age was 63 years (interquartile range, 52-70 years), and the majority had stage 2 POP (65.7%). Of all patients, 59.3% had Medicare/Medicaid, 39.9% were privately insured, and 0.9% were uninsured. Furthermore, 74.7% selected surgical management, and 25.3% chose conservative management. Increasing age and higher Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System stage were significantly associated with selecting surgery (P = 0.01). Women residing in a more disadvantaged area had a 67% increased odds of choosing surgical over conservative management (adjusted odds ratio, 1.67; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-2.64) after adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, body mass index, and Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System stage. CONCLUSIONS: Residing in a more disadvantaged zip code was associated with 67% increased odds of choosing surgical versus conservative POP management.


Asunto(s)
Medicare , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico , Femenino , Humanos , Anciano , Estados Unidos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Etnicidad , Clase Social , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/epidemiología
6.
Obstet Gynecol ; 143(3): 411-418, 2024 Mar 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38227947

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To describe longitudinal reoperation risk among older women undergoing surgery for apical pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and to compare risk of reoperation for prolapse and complications among different surgical approaches. METHODS: This nationwide, retrospective cohort study evaluated older adult women (aged 65 years and older) within the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' (CMS) 5% LDS (Limited Data Set) who underwent sacrocolpopexy, uterosacral ligament suspension (USLS), sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF), or colpocleisis, or their uterine-preserving equivalents, from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2018, with follow-up through 2019. The primary outcome was overall reoperation, and secondary outcomes included reoperation for POP and for complications. Rates were compared using χ 2 tests for categorical variables, Wilcoxon rank-sum for continuous variables and Kaplan Meier estimates of cumulative incidence. Death and exit from CMS insurance were considered as censoring events. We used cumulative incidence to calculate reoperation risk as a function of time at 1 year or more, 3 years or more, and 7 years or more. RESULTS: This cohort included 4,089 women who underwent surgery to treat apical POP from 2011 to 2018: 1,034 underwent sacrocolpopexy, 717 underwent USLS, 1,529 underwent SSLF, and 809 underwent colpocleisis. Demographics varied among patients for each POP surgery. Patients who underwent the different surgeries had differences in age ( P <.01), Charlson Comorbidity Index score ( P <.01), diabetes ( P <.01), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ( P <.01), hypertension ( P <.01), chronic pain ( P =.01), congestive heart failure ( P <.01), and concomitant hysterectomy ( P <.01). Reoperation rates were low and increased over time. The overall reoperation risk through 7 years was 7.3% for colpocleisis, 10.4% for USLS, 12.5% for sacrocolpopexy, and 15.0% for SSLF ( P <.01). Reoperation for recurrent POP through 7 years was 2.9% for colpocleisis, 7.3% for sacrocolpopexy, 7.7% for USLS, and 9.9% for SSLF ( P <.01). Reoperation for complications through 7 years was 5.3% for colpocleisis, 8.2% for sacrocolpopexy, 6.4% for USLS, and 8.2% for SSLF ( P <.01). CONCLUSION: The type of surgical repair is significantly associated with long-term risk of reoperation. Colpocleisis offers the least likelihood of reoperation for prolapse, followed by sacrocolpopexy; colpocleisis followed by USLS has the least risk of long-term reoperation for complication.


Asunto(s)
Medicare , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico , Anciano , Humanos , Femenino , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugía , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/cirugía , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/epidemiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
Int Urogynecol J ; 35(1): 103-108, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37897521

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Most of the literature on pelvic organ prolapse (POP) has been generated from postmenopausal patients in high-income countries. In the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), a significant proportion of patients who present for surgical management of POP are premenopausal. Little is known about the impact of POP on pelvic floor symptoms in this population. The objective was to describe pelvic floor symptoms and sexual function among premenopausal patients presenting for POP surgery in DRC. METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study of symptomatic premenopausal patients undergoing fertility-sparing POP surgery at a large referral hospital in the DRC. Pelvic floor symptoms were evaluated with the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory Questionnaire and sexual function with the Pelvic organ prolapse/urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire. Data are presented as means with standard deviations or counts with percentages. RESULTS: A total of 107 patients were recruited between April 2019 and December 2021. All had either stage III (95.3%) or stage IV (4.7%) prolapse. Ages were 34.2 ± 6.7 years; 78.5% were married. A majority of patients experienced low abdominal pain (82.2%), heaviness or dullness (95.3%), and bulging or protrusion of the prolapse (92.5%). Almost two-thirds of patients reported no longer being sexually active, and 80% stated that they were not sexually active because of POP. Of the 37 sexually active patients (34.6%), nearly all reported significant sexual impairment because of the prolapse, with only 4 reporting no sexual impairment. CONCLUSIONS: This study represents one of the largest prospective series of patients with premenopausal POP. Our results highlight the severity of pelvic floor symptoms and the negative effects on sexual function among this patient population with POP.


Asunto(s)
Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico , Incontinencia Urinaria , Humanos , Femenino , República Democrática del Congo/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Diafragma Pélvico , Incontinencia Urinaria/epidemiología , Incontinencia Urinaria/etiología , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/complicaciones , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/epidemiología , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/cirugía , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
8.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 164(3): 1141-1150, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37830235

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between different pelvic floor disorders and the presence of sexual dysfunction in women. METHOD: An observational study of non-pregnant women was carried out in Spain in 2021 and 2022. To assess the presence of pelvic floor problems, the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) was used, consisting of the subscales Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory-6 (POPDI-6; prolapse symptoms), Colorectal-Anal Distress Inventory (CRADI-8; colorectal symptoms), and Urinary Distress Inventory-6 (UDI-6; urinary symptoms). The validated tool, Female Sexual Function (FSF), was used to evaluate female sexual function. RESULTS: In total, 1008 women participated. Of these, 288 (28.6%) had some type of sexual dysfunction. Regarding symptoms, 52 (5.2%) stated that they do not reach orgasm and 172 (17.1%) said they had never or occasionally felt sexual desire in the last month. Women with sexual dysfunctions had higher mean scores on the POPDI-6, CRADI-8, and UDI-6 subscales than those who did not have sexual dysfunction (P ≤ 0.005). Risk factors identified included being postmenopausal, with an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 2.98 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.12-4.18), and a greater impact of the symptoms of pelvic floor problems as assessed by the PFDI-20 scale, in such a way that for each point increase the probability of sexual dysfunction increases with an aOR of 1.008 (95% CI 1.005-1.011). CONCLUSION: Women with pelvic floor disorders and postmenopausal women present sexual dysfunction more frequently.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Trastornos del Suelo Pélvico , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico , Disfunciones Sexuales Fisiológicas , Femenino , Humanos , Trastornos del Suelo Pélvico/complicaciones , Trastornos del Suelo Pélvico/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Conducta Sexual , Sexualidad , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/complicaciones , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/epidemiología , Disfunciones Sexuales Fisiológicas/epidemiología , Disfunciones Sexuales Fisiológicas/etiología , Calidad de Vida
9.
Inquiry ; 60: 469580231219155, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38098235

RESUMEN

Pelvic organ prolapse is the downward descent of female organs, including the bladder, small bowel, and large bowel, resulting in the protrusion of the vagina, uterus, or both. This disorder, exclusive to women, causes psychological trauma and social withdrawal, leading to an increased rate of gynecologic surgery. To assess the Pelvic Organ Prolapse and its associated factors among Women Visiting public Hospitals in south west Ethiopia. An institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted among gynecologic patients. A total sample size of 408 was allocated to the institutions proportional to their previous month's case load. Data were collected using an interviewer-administered structured questionnaire. The collected data were coded and entered into EpiData version 3.1, then exported to SPSS version 20 for descriptive and inferential analysis. Adjusted odds ratios (AOR) along with a 95% confidence level were estimated, and a P-value < .05 was considered statistically significant. Out of the intended sample size, 393 women participated in the study, resulting in a response rate of 96.3%. The overall magnitude of pelvic organ prolapse among the study participants was 19.8% (95% CI: 16.0, 24.1). Factors significantly associated with pelvic organ prolapse were place of residence (AOR = 2.21, 95% CI: 1.11, 4.40), parity (AOR = 2.82, 95% CI: 1.39, 5.72), age at first pregnancy (AOR = 2.32, 95% CI: 1.27, 4.26), and place of delivery of the first child (AOR = 4.18, 95% CI: 1.97, 8.85). The prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse is high. Place of residence, parity, age at first pregnancy, and place of delivery of the first child were factors significantly associated with pelvic organ prolapse. Therefore, different stakeholders, programmers, and implementers should take aggressive steps to prevent early pregnancy, train health professionals to encourage women to use family planning, and promote institutional delivery.


Asunto(s)
Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Etiopía/epidemiología , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
10.
Ann Med ; 55(2): 2273428, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37883921

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This retrospective cohort study aimed to determine the prevalence of precancerous or malignant lesions of the cervix and/or endometrium among patients who underwent vaginal hysterectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical record of patients who had been diagnosed with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and undergone vaginal hysterectomy from January 2009 to September 2018 in tertiary hospital was reviewed. The exclusion criteria included individuals who had previously received a diagnosis of gynecologic precancerous lesions or cancer, had abnormal preoperative findings, presented abnormal cervical cancer screening test results or abnormal results from preoperative endometrial biopsy, and had incomplete operative notes or pathological results. RESULTS: The electronic medical records of 530 patients were reviewed and included in the analysis. Nine of the 530 patients (1.7%) had precancerous or malignant lesions of the cervix and/or endometrium. The prevalence of atypical endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial carcinoma were 0.19% and 0.57%, respectively. All of the patients with endometrial cancer subsequently underwent complete surgical staging. Precancerous cervical lesions were found in five patients (0.95%): CIN II 0.38% and CIN III 0.57%. No cases of cervical cancer were identified. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to detect a minor prevalence of precancerous and malignant lesions following post-operative procedures in POP. The assessment of the elderly through the use of risk-based evaluation merits attention for the purpose of early identification. This study offers valuable insights that can be utilized in preoperative counseling and enhancing the preoperative evaluation process.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Endometriales , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico , Lesiones Precancerosas , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Histerectomía Vaginal , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/epidemiología , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/cirugía , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Prevalencia , Lesiones Precancerosas/epidemiología , Lesiones Precancerosas/cirugía , Lesiones Precancerosas/patología , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/epidemiología , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/cirugía , Neoplasias Endometriales/epidemiología , Neoplasias Endometriales/cirugía , Neoplasias Endometriales/diagnóstico
11.
Urogynecology (Phila) ; 29(10): 787-799, 2023 10 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37733440

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare 12-month subjective and objective outcomes between 3 approaches to apical pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery in patients presenting with uterovaginal or posthysterectomy vaginal prolapse enrolled in the Pelvic Floor Disorders Registry for Research. STUDY DESIGN: This was an analysis of a multicenter, prospective registry that collected both patient- and physician-reported data for up to 3 years after conservative (pessary) and surgical treatment for POP. Twelve-month subjective and anatomic outcomes for patients who underwent surgical treatment were extracted from the registry for analysis. Pelvic organ prolapse recurrence was defined as a composite outcome and compared between the 3 apical surgery groups (native tissue repair, sacrocolpopexy, colpocleisis) as well as the 2 reconstructive surgery groups (native tissue repair and sacrocolpopexy). RESULTS: A total of 1,153 women were enrolled in the registry and 777 (67%) opted for surgical treatment, of whom 641 underwent apical repair and were included in this analysis (404 native tissue repair, 187 sacrocolpopexy, and 50 colpocleisis). The overall incidence of recurrence was as follows: subjective 6.5%, anatomic 4.7%, retreatment 7.2%, and composite 13.6%. The incidence of recurrence was not different between the 3 surgical groups. When baseline patient characteristics were controlled for, composite POP recurrence between the native tissue and sacrocolpopexy groups remained statistically nonsignificant. Concurrent perineorrhaphy with any type of apical POP surgery was associated with a lower risk of recurrence (adjusted odds ratio, 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.25-0.74; P = 0.002) and prior hysterectomy was associated with a higher risk (adjusted odds ratio, 1.77, 95% confidence interval, 1.04-3.03; P = 0.036). CONCLUSION: Pelvic Floor Disorders Registry for Research participants undergoing native tissue apical POP repair, sacrocolpopexy, and colpocleisis surgery had similar rates of POP recurrence 12 months after surgery.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos del Suelo Pélvico , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico , Prolapso Uterino , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Prolapso Uterino/epidemiología , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/epidemiología , Sistema de Registros , Colpotomía
12.
J Nepal Health Res Counc ; 21(1): 86-91, 2023 Sep 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37742155

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Prolapse is among the most common indication for gynaecological surgery. It is difficult to estimate prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse even in developed countries due to lack of epidemiological studies. This study was done to find the prevalence, risk factors and common presenting complaints of women with pelvic organ prolapse. METHODS: Women with pelvic organ prolapse visiting Paropakar Maternity and Women's Hospital during 4 months duration in 2021 were approached and after obtaining an informed consent, all the patient information on various risk factors and clinical profile(age,parity,body mass index,smoking etc.) for pelvic organ prolpase were collected in a pre-developed proforma. Pelvic Organ Prolapse was classified by Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system. Data analysis was done using statistical package for the social sciences-25. Ethical approval was taken from Institutional Review Committee- National Academy of Medical Sciences. RESULTS: Out of 58 cases enrolled in the study, prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse was found to be 1.28%. Women belonging to age group ≥ 49 years was 91.4%. Bulge symptom was the most common presenting complain among the women, 98.3%. 50% of women (n=29) were grand multipara. 53.4% (n=31) of women had delivered their first baby before 20 years of age. Multiparity,vaginal birth and menopausal age were the common risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Menopausal age, multi-parity, vaginal births, age at first vaginal delivery of less than 20 years were significant risk factors for development of prolapse. Bulge symptom was the most common presenting complaint. However,Smoking habit, overweight were not related to pelvic organ prolapse.


Asunto(s)
Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico , Embarazo , Lactante , Humanos , Femenino , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nepal/epidemiología , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/epidemiología , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/etiología , Pacientes , Fumar/efectos adversos , Fumar/epidemiología , Índice de Masa Corporal
13.
Afr Health Sci ; 23(1): 410-416, 2023 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37545968

RESUMEN

Introduction: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is associated with negative physical, social, psychological, and sexual experiences. There is paucity of data in low and middle income countries like Uganda. The purpose of this study was to describe clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing surgery for POP from 2007 to 2016. Methods: The study was conducted at Mulago National Referral Hospital from 2014 to 2016. We conducted a retrospective review of the urogynecology surgical records using a standardized medical record abstraction form. Data of 222 POP patients were abstracted and managed using REDCap. Analysis was performed using Stata statistical software, v14. Results: The mean participant age and parity was 57 years and 7 respectively. Ninety four percent of participants presented with a mass protruding from the vagina, 38% with uterine prolapse and 32% with cystocoele. Anaemia and hypertension were common comorbidities. Women underwent a variety of surgery types, and 35% experienced persistent pain post-operatively. At hospital discharge, 83% had achieved either complete resolution or improvement in their condition. Conclusions: Measures encouraging presentation for care as soon as symptoms are experienced and reduction of total fertility rate will be beneficial. Patients with POP should be routinely screened for anaemia and hypertension.


Asunto(s)
Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico , Humanos , Femenino , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/epidemiología , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/cirugía , Vagina , Estudios Retrospectivos , Hospitales , Derivación y Consulta , Resultado del Tratamiento
14.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 288: 170-174, 2023 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37549508

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To explore the influence of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) on the risk of high-risk human papilloma virus (HR-HPV) infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the HR-HPV infection results of 1183 patients with POP who were treated at the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Liangping District People's Hospital affiliated to Chongqing Medical University, and the 13th People's Hospital of Chongqing between October 2018 and October 2021. Patients without POP who underwent HR-HPV examination at the same time were selected as the control group, and the HR-PV infection rate was compared between the two groups. Patients diagnosed with POP were stratified to analyse whether age, menopausal status, degree of POP, location of POP and duration of POP were associated with HR-HPV infection. RESULTS: The rate of HR-HPV infection was lower for patients with POP compared with patients without POP over the same time period. The highest rate of infection was seen in patients aged 60-69 years (14.7%) and the lowest rate (7.5%) was seen in patients aged 50-59 years; differences between age groups were significant. The rate of HR-HPV infection in postmenopausal patients with POP was slightly higher than that in non-menopausal patients with POP, but the difference was not significant. No significant differences in the rate of HR-HPV infection were associated with location of POP, duration of POP or degree of POP. CONCLUSION: POP does not increase the risk of HR-HPV infection.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Papillomavirus , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/complicaciones , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/epidemiología , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/complicaciones , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/epidemiología
15.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 163(3): 854-861, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37465949

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence of bowel symptoms in patients with pelvic organ prolapse (POP), to evaluate the changes in bowel symptoms after different POP surgeries, and to identify risk factors for unrelieved bowel symptoms. METHODS: This was an observational prospective cohort study conducted at Peking University First Hospital from 2020 to 2021. Demographic, clinical, and therapeutic data were collected. Participants underwent POP Quantification examination and completed the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 questionnaire at baseline and 1 year postoperatively. RESULTS: The prevalence of bowel symptoms and bothersome bowel symptoms in women with POP was 46.38% and 24.40%, respectively. Surgical correction of prolapse was associated with significant relief in bowel symptoms (P < 0.05). Colpocleisis may relieve bowel symptoms better than reconstructive surgeries (41% vs. 31%, P = 0.048). However, 35% of women had at least one bowel symptom at the 1-year follow up. A long perineal body (Pb) and levator ani muscle injury were found to be predictors of unrelieved bowel symptoms in patients undergoing colpocleisis and those undergoing reconstructive surgery, respectively (odds ratio [OR] 2.306, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.112-4.783, P = 0.025 and OR 3.245, 95% CI 1.266-8.317, P = 0.014, respectively), and perineoplasty was a protective factor for women who underwent colpocleisis (OR 0.102, 95% CI 0.025-0.417, P = 0.001) CONCLUSION: Women with POP have a high prevalence of bowel symptoms. Although bowel symptoms can be relieved after POP surgeries, one-third of women still experience bowel symptoms. A long Pb and levator ani muscle injury were associated with unrelieved bowel symptoms, while perineoplasty was a protective factor.


Asunto(s)
Plomo , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico , Embarazo , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Estudios de Seguimiento , Estudios Prospectivos , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/cirugía , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/epidemiología , Colpotomía
16.
Int Urogynecol J ; 34(11): 2719-2724, 2023 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37401960

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study was to assess the incidence and risk factors for premalignant and malignant pathology in patients receiving vaginal hysterectomy (VH) and pelvic floor repair (PFR) for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of pathological results after VH and PFR of 569 women at our institution from January 2011 through December 2020. Age, body mass index (BMI), POP-Q stage, and preoperative ultrasound results were evaluated as risk factors for occult malignancy. RESULTS: Six of the 569 patients (1.1%) had unanticipated premalignant uterine pathology and 2 (0.4%) had unanticipated malignant uterine pathology (endometrial cancer). There was no significant difference in the incidence of premalignant or malignant uterine pathology according to age, BMI, and POP-Q stage. However, if endometrial pathology is confirmed on preoperative ultrasonography, the probability of confirming malignant pathology increases (OR 4.63; 95% CI 1.84-51.4; p=0.016). CONCLUSION: The incidence of occult malignancy during VH for POP was significantly lower than that found in hysterectomy owing to benign disease. In the case of POP patients, for whom uterine-conserving surgery is not absolutely contraindicated, it can be performed. However, if endometrial pathology is confirmed by preoperative ultrasonography, uterine-conserving surgery is not recommended.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Endometriales , Histerectomía Vaginal , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Endometriales/epidemiología , Neoplasias Endometriales/etiología , Neoplasias Endometriales/cirugía , Histerectomía Vaginal/efectos adversos , Incidencia , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/epidemiología , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/etiología , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
18.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 229(3): 320.e1-320.e7, 2023 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37244455

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There are no definitive guidelines for surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Previous data suggests geographic variation in apical repair rates in health systems throughout the United States. Such variation can reflect lack of standardized treatment pathways. An additional area of variation for pelvic organ prolapse repair may be hysterectomy approach which could not only influence concurrent repair procedures, but also healthcare utilization. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine statewide geographic variation in surgical approach of hysterectomy for prolapse repair and concurrent use of colporrhaphy and colpopexy. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective analysis of Blue Cross Blue Shield, Medicare, and Medicaid fee-for-service insurance claims for hysterectomies performed for prolapse in Michigan between October 2015 and December 2021. Prolapse was identified with International Classification of Disease Tenth Revision codes. The primary outcome was variation in surgical approach for hysterectomy as determined by Current Procedural Terminology code (vaginal, laparoscopic, laparoscopic assisted vaginal, or abdominal) on a county level. Patient home address zip codes were used to determine county of residence. A hierarchical multivariable logistic regression model with vaginal approach as the dependent variable and county-level random effects was estimated. Patient attributes, including age, comorbidities (diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, morbid obesity), concurrent gynecologic diagnoses, health insurance type, and social vulnerability index were used as fixed-effects. To estimate variation between counties in vaginal hysterectomy rates, a median odds ratio was calculated. RESULTS: There were 6974 hysterectomies for prolapse representing 78 total counties that met eligibility criteria. Of these, 2865 (41.1%) underwent vaginal hysterectomy, 1119 (16.0%) underwent laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy, and 2990 (42.9%) underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy. The proportion of vaginal hysterectomy across 78 counties ranged from 5.8% to 86.8%. The median odds ratio was 1.86 (95% credible interval, 1.33-3.83), consistent with a high level of variation. Thirty-seven counties were considered statistical outliers because the observed proportion of vaginal hysterectomy was outside the predicted range (as defined by confidence intervals of the funnel plot). Vaginal hysterectomy was associated with higher rates of concurrent colporrhaphy than laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy or laparoscopic hysterectomy (88.5% vs 65.6% vs 41.1%, respectively; P<.001) and lower rates of concurrent colpopexy (45.7% vs 51.7% vs 80.1%, respectively; P<.001). CONCLUSION: This statewide analysis reveals a significant level of variation in the surgical approach for hysterectomies performed for prolapse. The variation in surgical approach for hysterectomy may help account for high rates of variation in concurrent procedures, especially apical suspension procedures. These data highlight how geographic location may influence the surgical procedures a patient undergoes for uterine prolapse.


Asunto(s)
Medicare , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico , Anciano , Femenino , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Histerectomía/métodos , Histerectomía Vaginal/métodos , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/epidemiología , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/métodos
19.
Int Urogynecol J ; 34(9): 2007-2032, 2023 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37256322

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The literature is scarce regarding the effects of comorbidities, clinical parameters, and lifestyle as risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). This study was performed to systematically review the literature related to body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension (HT), dyslipidemia, chronic constipation, smoking, chronic cough, occupation, and striae and varicose veins as determinants for POP. METHODS: Search terms in accordance with Medical Subject Headings were used in PubMed, Embase, LILACS, and the Cochrane Library. Clinical comparative studies between women with and without POP and containing demographic and/or clinical raw data related to lifestyle and/or comorbidities were included. The ROBINS-I (risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions) instrument was used. Fixed-effects and random-effects models were used for homogeneous and heterogeneous studies, respectively. RESULTS: Forty-three studies were included in the meta-analysis. BMI < 25 kg/m2 was found to be a protective factor for POP [OR 0.71 (0.51, 0.99); p = 0.04], and BMI > 30 kg/m2 was a risk factor for POP [OR 1.44 (1.37, 1.52); p < 0.00001]. Waist circumference (≥ 88 cm) was reported as a risk factor for POP [OR 1.80 (1.37, 2.38); p < 0.00001], along with HT [OR 1.18 (1.09, 1.27); p = 0.04], constipation [OR 1.77 (1.23, 2.54); p < 0.00001], occupation [OR 1.86 (1.21, 2.86); p < 0.00001], persistent cough [OR 1.52 (1.18, 1.94); p < 0.0001]), and varicose veins [OR 2.01 (1.50, 2.70); p = 0.12]. CONCLUSIONS: BMI < 25 kg/m2 is protective while BMI > 30 kg/m2 is a risk factor for POP. Large waist circumference, dyslipidemia, HT, constipation, occupation, persistent cough, and varicose veins are also determinants for POP.


Asunto(s)
Hipertensión , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico , Várices , Femenino , Humanos , Tos , Factores de Riesgo , Estilo de Vida , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/epidemiología , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/etiología , Estreñimiento/epidemiología , Estreñimiento/etiología
20.
Int Urogynecol J ; 34(9): 2147-2154, 2023 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37010544

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: We aimed to determine the association between pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and hydroureteronephrosis (HUN), risk factors for developing HUN and resolution of HUN after surgery. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on 528 patients diagnosed with uterine prolapse. RESULTS: All patients with or without HUN were compared in terms of risk factors. The 528 patients were divided into five groups according to the POP-Q classification. A significant relationship was found between POP stage and HUN. The other risk factors for developing HUN were age, rural life, parity, vaginal delivery, smoking, body mass index and increased comorbidity. The prevalence of POP was 12.2% and the prevalence of HUN was 65.3%. All patients with HUN underwent surgery. After surgery, HUN resolved in 292 (84.6%) patients. CONCLUSION: POP is a multifactorial herniation of pelvic organs out of the urogenital hiatus due to pelvic floor dysfunction. The main etiological factors in POP are older age, grand multiparity, vaginal delivery and obesity. The most important problem in patients with severe POP is HUN due to urethral kinking or urethral obstruction, which is a result of the cystocele squeezing the urethra under the pubic bone. In low-income countries, the main aim is to prevent the development of POP, which is the most common cause of HUN. It is important to increase the level of knowledge about contraception methods and to increase screening and training to reduce other risk factors. Women should be made aware of the importance of gynecological examination in the menopausal period.


Asunto(s)
Cistocele , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/epidemiología , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/etiología , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/cirugía , Parto Obstétrico/efectos adversos , Cistocele/complicaciones , Paridad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA