Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 42
Filtrar
1.
Scand J Urol ; 59: 70-75, 2024 Apr 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38647246

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To investigate national trends of surgical treatment for benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). METHODS: The Care Register for Healthcare in Finland was used to investigate the annual numbers and types of surgical procedures, operation incidence and duration of hospital stay between 2004 and 2018 in Finland. Procedures were classified using the Nordic Medico-Statistical Committee Classification of Surgical Procedures coding. Trends in incidence were analyzed with two-sided Cochran-Armitage test. Trends in duration of hospital stay and patient age were analyzed with linear regression. RESULTS: Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) was the most common operation type during the study period, covering over 70% of operations for BPO. Simultaneous with the implementation of photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP), the incidence of TURP, minimally invasive surgical therapies, transurethral vaporization of the prostate (TUVP) and open prostatectomies decreased (p < 0.05). The mean operation incidence rate in the population between 2004 and 2018 was 263 per 100,000. The duration of hospital stay shortened (p < 0.05), and the average age of operated patients increased by 2 years (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The implementation of PVP did not challenge the dominating position of TURP in Finland, but it has probably influenced the overall use of other surgical therapies, excluding transurethral incision of the prostate.  The results might suggest that the conservative treatment is accentuated, patient selection is more thorough, and surgical intervention might be placed at a later stage of BPO.


Asunto(s)
Tiempo de Internación , Prostatectomía , Hiperplasia Prostática , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata , Humanos , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirugía , Hiperplasia Prostática/epidemiología , Masculino , Finlandia/epidemiología , Anciano , Prostatectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Prostatectomía/métodos , Prostatectomía/tendencias , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata/estadística & datos numéricos , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata/tendencias , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Incidencia , Anciano de 80 o más Años
2.
Curr Urol Rep ; 22(1): 4, 2021 Jan 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33403529

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Rezum® is a novel convection-based thermal therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) induced lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). This review provides an overview of its safety, efficacy, cost, and potential role in the paradigm of BPH/LUTS therapies. RECENT FINDINGS: Data regarding Rezum® stems primarily from one large randomized controlled trial of 197 patients with 4 years of follow-up. The efficacy and safety of Rezum® is further supported by 4 additional studies including 1 prospective pilot study, 1 crossover study, and 2 retrospective studies. Durable improvements in IPSS (47-60%), QoL (38-52%), Qmax (45-72%), and PVR (11-38%) were seen without causing deterioration of sexual function. Rezum® offers a cost-effective and safe approach to treating BPH/LUTS and should be considered as a possible first-line therapy for patients with moderate to severe symptoms.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Ablación/métodos , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/cirugía , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirugía , Vapor , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata/métodos , Técnicas de Ablación/economía , Técnicas de Ablación/tendencias , Convección , Cistoscopía , Humanos , Hipertermia Inducida/economía , Hipertermia Inducida/métodos , Hipertermia Inducida/tendencias , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/economía , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/etiología , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Próstata/cirugía , Hiperplasia Prostática/complicaciones , Hiperplasia Prostática/diagnóstico por imagen , Hiperplasia Prostática/economía , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata/economía , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata/tendencias , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Curr Urol Rep ; 21(12): 63, 2020 Nov 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33210174

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To gain an understanding of current practices in the management of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTSs) in the setting of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Including both medication therapy and emerging minimally invasive options including peri-procedure considerations, expected outcomes, and value-based considerations. RECENT FINDINGS: Medical therapy, primarily alpha blockers (ABs), and 5 alpha reductase inhibitors (5-ARI) remain the most commonly utilized intervention for LUTS associated with BPH. Several minimally invasive surgical treatments (MISTs) have emerged to provide efficacious and durable results, while largely sparing men from the sexual adverse effects of more invasive surgical options. The introduction of value-based health care has led to more cost-conscious medical care and is poised to influence the landscape of LUTS associated with BPH treatment. As the population-based and societal needs continue to influence medical care for men with LUTS associated with BPH, a paradigm shift in management is expected.


Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de 5-alfa-Reductasa/uso terapéutico , Técnicas de Ablación/tendencias , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos alfa/uso terapéutico , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/terapia , Dinámica Poblacional , Hiperplasia Prostática/terapia , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata/tendencias , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/etiología , Masculino , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/tendencias , Hiperplasia Prostática/complicaciones
4.
J Endourol ; 33(1): 62-68, 2019 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30039715

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There are currently several different surgical options for patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). The literature has demonstrated equivalent or superior results for holmium laser enucleation of prostate (HoLEP) but with exceptional long-term durability compared to other minimally invasive options. Despite this, HoLEP is not widely practiced. Herein, we investigate trends and outcomes from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) to support a need for further adoption of HoLEP. METHODS: Using ACS-NSQIP data from 2011 to 2015, trends, baseline characteristics, and perioperative outcomes were collected for major BPH procedures: transurethral resection of prostate (TURP), TURP for regrowth, photovaporization of prostate (PVP), HoLEP, and simple prostatectomy. RESULTS: The most common procedure performed every year was TURP with PVP performed about half as often, while HoLEP (4%-5%) was performed about as infrequently as simple prostatectomy (3%). More African American men underwent simple prostatectomy except in 2011. International normalized ratio (INR) was highest every year for PVP. Hospital stay and transfusion rates were lowest with PVP and HoLEP. Transfusion rates for simple prostatectomy were high (16.0%-25.4%). Lower rates of readmission, reoperation, and urinary tract infection were seen in some years with HoLEP. CONCLUSIONS: Given the previously reported favorable outcomes and long-term durability of HoLEP, these ACS-NSQIP data further support that HoLEP should be more often practiced for patients undergoing surgery for BPH.


Asunto(s)
Hiperplasia Prostática/cirugía , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata/estadística & datos numéricos , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata/tendencias , Transfusión Sanguínea , Humanos , Terapia por Láser/métodos , Láseres de Estado Sólido , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Periodo Perioperatorio , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Prostatectomía/métodos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata/normas , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
5.
BMC Urol ; 18(1): 102, 2018 Nov 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30424755

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer is a common malignancy of the male genitourinary system that occurs worldwide. The current research aims to investigate caveolin-1 expression in prostate cancer tissue and its relationship with pathological grade, clinical pathologic staging, and preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. METHODS: From January 2012 to December 2014, samples from 47 patients with prostate cancer who had received transurethral prostatic resection (TURP) and 20 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia were collected at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University. Caveolin-1 was detected by streptavidin-perosidase (SP) immunohistochemical staining in pathological tissue slices. The results were statistically analyzed for pathological grade, clinical stage, and preoperative PSA level. RESULTS: The expression of caveolin-1 was significantly higher in prostate cancer samples than in benign prostatic hyperplasia samples (P < 0.05), and caveolin-1 expression was significantly different among the pathological grades of poorly, moderately and well-differentiated prostate cancer (P < 0.05). The difference in caveolin-1 expression was significant for different clinical stages (T1-T2 and T3-T4) of prostate cancer (P < 0.05). The difference in caveolin-1 expression was not significant among samples with different preoperative PSA levels (0-10, 10-100 and > 100 µg/L) (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Caveolin-1 is closely related to the pathological grade and clinical stage of prostate cancer after transurethral surgery, and it may be a novel tumor marker for prostate cancer. The expression of caveolin-1 is not associated with preoperative serum PSA levels.


Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor/biosíntesis , Caveolina 1/biosíntesis , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica , Neoplasias de la Próstata/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata/tendencias , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Caveolina 1/genética , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias/tendencias , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología
6.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl ; 100(4): 326-329, 2018 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29543050

RESUMEN

Introduction Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is considered the gold standard surgical treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia. The number of TURPs performed has declined significantly over the last three decades owing to pharmaceutical therapy. TURP data from a single institution for the years 1990, 2000 and 2010 were compared to assess the difference in performance. Methods A retrospective analysis was undertaken of all patients who underwent TURP between January and December 2010. These findings were compared with historical data for the years 1990 and 2000: 100 sets of case notes were selected randomly from each of these years. Results The number of TURPs performed fell from 326 in 1990 to 113 in 2010. The mean age of patients increased from 70.6 years to 74.0 years. There was also a significant increase in the mean ASA grade from 1.9 to 2.3. The most common indication for TURP shifted from LUTS to acute urinary retention. No significant change in operating time was observed. The mean resection weight remained constant (22.95g in 1990, 22.55g in 2000, 20.76g in 2010). A reduction in transfusion rates was observed but there were higher rates of secondary haematuria and bladder neck stenosis. There was an increase from 2% to 11.5% of patients with long-term failure to void following TURP. Conclusions The number of TURPs performed continues to decline, which could lead to potential training issues. Urinary retention is still by far the most common indication. However, there has been a significant rise in the percentage of men presenting for TURP with high pressure chronic retention. The number of patients with bladder dysfunction who either have persistent storage LUTS or eventually require long-term catheterisation or intermittent self-catheterisation has increased markedly, which raises the question of what the long-term real life impact of medical therapy is on men with LUTS secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia who eventually require surgery.


Asunto(s)
Transfusión Sanguínea/estadística & datos numéricos , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/cirugía , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirugía , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata/tendencias , Retención Urinaria/cirugía , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Hematuria/epidemiología , Hematuria/etiología , Humanos , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/etiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Próstata/cirugía , Hiperplasia Prostática/complicaciones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata/efectos adversos , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Obstrucción del Cuello de la Vejiga Urinaria/epidemiología , Obstrucción del Cuello de la Vejiga Urinaria/etiología , Retención Urinaria/etiología
8.
Value Health ; 18(4): 376-86, 2015 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26091591

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In 2008, a UK assessment of technologies for benign prostatic obstruction concluded negatively about photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP), and the 2010 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidance caused several UK institutions to abandon PVP. OBJECTIVE: To reassess the costs and effects of PVP versus transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) on the basis of most recent data. METHODS: The same model was used as in 2008. Transition probabilities were estimated using a Bayesian approach updating the 2008 estimates with data from two meta-analyses and data from GOLIATH, the latest and largest trial comparing PVP with TURP. Utility estimates were from the 2008 assessment, and estimates of resource utilization and costs were updated. Effectiveness was measured in quality-adjusted life-years gained, and costs are in UK pounds. The balance between costs and effects was addressed by multivariate sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: If the 2010 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence analysis would have updated the cost-effectiveness analysis with figures from its own meta-analysis, it would have estimated the change in quality-adjusted life-years at -0.01 (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.05 to 0.01) instead of at -0.11 (95% CI -0.31 to -0.01) as in the 2008 analysis. The GOLIATH estimate of -0.01 (95% CI -0.07 to 0.02) strengthens the conclusion of near equivalence. Estimates of additional costs vary from £491 (£21-£1286) in 2008 to £111 (-£315 to £595) for 2010 and to £109 (-£204 to £504) for GOLIATH. PVP becomes cost saving if more than 32% can be carried out as a day case in the United Kingdom. CONCLUSIONS: The available evidence indicates that PVP can be a cost-effective alternative for TURP in a potentially broad group of patients.


Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Terapia por Láser/economía , Enfermedades de la Próstata/economía , Enfermedades de la Próstata/cirugía , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/tendencias , Humanos , Terapia por Láser/tendencias , Masculino , Cadenas de Markov , Próstata , Enfermedades de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata/tendencias , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
Urology ; 85(5): 1143-1150, 2015 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25704995

RESUMEN

Bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate (B-TURP) represents a Darwinian evolution of an instrumental technique that has been justified by reinforcing the leading position of monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate. Notwithstanding limitations, the best available evidence recommends B-TURP as an attractive alternative. It may serve as a reliable training platform for modern residents. High-quality evidence is lacking to definitely define its position in treating special subpopulations (anticoagulation dependence, comorbidities, and large adenomas). Regarding economic issues, preliminary evidence supports B-TURP, warranting further investigation. Future perspectives include attempts toward improvements of the existing technology, combining advantages with those of other new techniques, and evolution to novel, potentially safer, or more efficient techniques to address remaining challenges.


Asunto(s)
Electrocirugia/instrumentación , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata/instrumentación , Electrocirugia/educación , Electrocirugia/métodos , Electrocirugia/tendencias , Predicción , Humanos , Masculino , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata/tendencias
10.
Urologia ; 81 Suppl 23: S38-42, 2014.
Artículo en Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24665033

RESUMEN

Laser technology has been used in the treatment of BPH for more than 15-20 years in order to challenge transurethral resection of the prostate. The aim of this review article is to analyze the evolution of laser in BPH therapy, from early coagulative techniques - progressively abandoned for their elevated postoperative morbidity and unfavorable outcomes - to the newer techniques of vaporization, resection and enucleation of the prostate. A better comprehension of tissue-laser interactions, the improvement of laser technology and a growing clinical experience have lead to the development of different laser systems (Holmium, KTP, Thulium laser) that challenge TURP. Today, HoLEP and, secondarily, PVP are the laser techniques supported by more clinical evidences and represent valid alternatives to TURP.


Asunto(s)
Coagulación con Láser , Terapia por Láser , Láseres de Estado Sólido/uso terapéutico , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirugía , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata/métodos , Humanos , Coagulación con Láser/tendencias , Terapia por Láser/tendencias , Láseres de Estado Sólido/clasificación , Masculino , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata/instrumentación , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata/tendencias
12.
Urologe A ; 52(3): 331-8, 2013 Mar.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23459921

RESUMEN

Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is the surgical standard which is truly minimally invasive by using a natural orifice and is also of durable efficacy. The use of TURP removes tissue from benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and leads to clinically relevant improvement in symptoms and quality of life as well as in micturition parameters and obstruction. Tissue is removed by high frequency (HF) current with synchronous hemostasis. Many modifications of TURP, such as the use of video, have become generally accepted and improved the standard. Other modifications were developed because the balance between cutting and hemostasis needed improvement in favor of hemostasis. Several modifications of TURP, such as modulation of HF pulses, band loops and bipolar resection and new procedures, such as vaporization and enucleation showed improved hemostasis. These modifications and procedures, however, have not yet replaced standard TURP but have become established as additional options.


Asunto(s)
Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/etiología , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/tendencias , Hiperplasia Prostática/complicaciones , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirugía , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata/métodos , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata/tendencias , Humanos , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/diagnóstico , Masculino , Hiperplasia Prostática/diagnóstico
14.
J Urol ; 188(5): 1837-41, 2012 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22999698

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Laser prostatectomy has increased in popularity in the last decade. However, traditional transurethral resection of the prostate remains common. To understand decisions about the use of laser prostatectomy vs transurethral prostate resection, we evaluated trends in transurethral surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia in an all payer data set, focusing on patient and provider factors associated with the receipt of laser prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using Florida State Inpatient Database and Ambulatory Surgery Database, we identified patients who underwent laser prostatectomy or transurethral prostate resection from 2001 to 2009. We calculated surgery rates with time, stratified by procedure type. We used multilevel regression to examine patient (age, race and comorbidity level) and provider (surgeon volume) factors associated with the receipt of laser prostatectomy vs transurethral prostate resection. RESULTS: While the overall rates of transurethral surgery remained stable during the study period (p = 0.227), laser prostatectomy use increased 400% from 25 to 114 procedures per 100,000 men (p <0.001), replacing about half of all transurethral prostate resections. Patients were less likely to undergo laser prostatectomy if they were older (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.61-0.70) and less healthy (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.45-0.51). While these factors were predictive of surgery type, most of the variation in laser prostatectomy use (69%) was determined by the urologist seen by the patient. CONCLUSIONS: Laser prostatectomy use has increased in the last decade at the expense of transurethral prostate resection, driven largely by provider effects. However, elderly and more infirm patients are least likely to undergo it, raising concern about underuse in this population.


Asunto(s)
Terapia por Láser , Prostatectomía/métodos , Prostatectomía/tendencias , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirugía , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata/tendencias , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Humanos , Terapia por Láser/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prostatectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata/estadística & datos numéricos
15.
Prog Urol ; 22(12): 711-7, 2012 Oct.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22999118

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Prostatic diseases are very important in urologist's practice. We wanted to study evolution of prostatic procedures using French national coding database. METHODS: We searched the Agence Technique d'Information sur l'Hospitalisation (ATIH) web server for prostatic procedures between 1997 and 2011 for both private and public sectors. RESULTS: The procedures were more often performed in private sector (up to 70%). There was a sustained increase (+332%) of the number of prostatectomies between 1997 and 2007 (more than 27,000 procedures), followed by a slight decrease. There is a rising use of laparoscopic approach from 35% in 2006 up to 58% in 2011. The use of brachytherapy and HIFU was marginal. Transurethral resection of the prostate number was stable between 56,000 and 60,000 procedures a year (for cancer for less than 7%). Adenomectomies number decreased from 9832 to 7963 procedures a year. CONCLUSION: The most noticeable data were upon prostatectomies number, with a peak effect in 2007. Laparoscopic procedures were more and more frequent. TURP number was stable, whereas adenomectomies number decreased.


Asunto(s)
Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Próstata/cirugía , Prostatectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Braquiterapia/estadística & datos numéricos , Braquiterapia/tendencias , Bases de Datos Factuales , Francia , Humanos , Laparoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Laparoscopía/tendencias , Masculino , Prostatectomía/tendencias , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata/estadística & datos numéricos , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata/tendencias
16.
Minerva Urol Nefrol ; 64(2): 123-33, 2012 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22617306

RESUMEN

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common disease in older men that can lead to lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). After failure of medical treatment, surgical managements has to be considered. Surgical management of lower urinary tract symptoms attributed to BPH has progressed over time as urologic surgeons search for more innovative and less invasive forms of treatment. Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) has long been the "gold standard" to which all other forms of treatment are compared. There are several different methods of surgical treatment of BPH, including whole gland enucleation, laser vaporization, and induction of necrosis with delayed reabsorption as well as hybrid techniques. As with any form of surgical intervention, long-term results define success. Long-term follow-up consists of examining overall efficacy with attention to associated adverse events. TURP has the luxury of the longest follow-up, while less invasive forms of treatment starting to acquire long-term data. There are several surgical options for BPH; newer methods do show promise, while the "gold standard" continues to demonstrate excellent surgical results.


Asunto(s)
Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/cirugía , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirugía , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata/métodos , Factores de Edad , Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Terapia por Láser/métodos , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/etiología , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/terapia , Masculino , Hiperplasia Prostática/terapia , Prostatismo/cirugía , Calidad de Vida , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Factores de Riesgo , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata/tendencias , Resultado del Tratamiento
17.
BJU Int ; 110(11): 1595-601, 2012 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22540956

RESUMEN

What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) remains the dominant and definitive treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS-BPH), but the widespread use of medical therapies (particularly monotherapies) for rapid symptom improvement has meant that the most common indication for TURP has shifted to moderate-severe medical therapy refractory LUTS to, coupled with abnormal objective parameters, or when complications arise. Patients undergoing TURP as part of contemporary randomised controlled trials are not older but have a larger preoperative prostate volume and reduced major morbidity compared with large cohort studies from successive past eras. Delayed surgery because of prolonged medical monotherapy may explain a higher reported failure to void rate, possibly because of negative impact on detrusor function from unrelieved obstruction. This study examined contemporary TURP for significant changes, specifically regarding prostate size, operative parameters, and outcomes, compared with two preceding decades. Electronic databases PubMed, EMBASE & Cochrane collaboration were searched for English literature on prospective randomized controlled trials, published between 1997 and 2007 using keywords "transurethral resection" and "prostate". Monopolar TURP (M-TURP) cohort data of each study were selectively pooled for analysis, weighting studies according to patient numbers. Where possible, pooled post-operative outcomes data were compared with two large cohort landmark studies of successive preceding decades. A total of 3470 patients from 67 studies were included. Mean patient age (67 years) was unchanged, while mean pre-operative prostate volume of 47.6 g was greater than previously reported. Mean resected prostate tissue (25.8 g) with a resection time of 38.5 minutes suggested improved resection efficiency. A statistically significantly reduced transfusion rate and increased urinary tract infection (UTI) rate were reported. Hospital stay (3.6 days) and initial catheterisation duration (2.5 days) were similar, but post-operative urinary retention rate was slightly higher (6.8%). Contemporary RCTs of M-TURP showed larger prostate volume, and reduced major morbidity, compared with large cohort studies from successive past eras. The higher reported failure to void rate, may possibly reflect worse detrusor function at time of TURP. Delaying surgery by prolonged medical monotherapy may compound this. Trials methodology in this area requires quality improvement and standardisation in future.


Asunto(s)
Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/cirugía , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirugía , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata/tendencias , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Transfusión Sanguínea/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento
18.
Urology ; 79(5): 1111-6, 2012 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22546389

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To report an update of the change in usage trends for different surgical treatments of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) among the United States Medicare population data from 2000-2008. The rate of usage of thermotherapy and laser therapy in the surgical treatment of BPH has been changing over the past decade in conjunction with a steady decrease of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). METHODS: Using the 100% Medicare carrier file for the years 2000-2008, we calculated counts and population-adjusted rates of BPH surgery. Rates of TURP, thermotherapy, and laser-using modalities were calculated and compared in relation to age, race, clinical setting, and reimbursement. RESULTS: After years of a steady rise, the total rate of all BPH procedures peaked in 2005 at 1078/100,000 and then declined by 15.4% to 912/100,000 in 2008. TURP rates continued to decline from 670 in 2000 to 351/100,000 in 2008. Rates of microwave thermoablation peaked in 2006 at 266/100,000 and then declined 26% in 2008. Laser vaporization almost completely replaced laser coagulation and in 2008 was the most commonly performed procedure second to TURP, with the majority performed as outpatient procedures (70%) and an increasing percentage in the office (12%). Men between ages 70 and 75 had the highest rate of procedures. Reimbursement rates correlate using some but not all procedures. Racial disparities reported previously appear to have resolved. CONCLUSION: Surgical treatment of BPH continues to change rapidly. TURP continues to decline and laser vaporization is the fastest growing modality. There is a big shift toward outpatient/office procedures. Reimbursement rates do not appear to have a consistent effect on usage.


Asunto(s)
Terapia por Láser/tendencias , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirugía , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata/tendencias , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Ambulatoria/tendencias , Humanos , Hipertermia Inducida/economía , Hipertermia Inducida/estadística & datos numéricos , Hipertermia Inducida/tendencias , Coagulación con Láser/economía , Coagulación con Láser/estadística & datos numéricos , Coagulación con Láser/tendencias , Terapia por Láser/economía , Terapia por Láser/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Medicare/economía , Microondas/uso terapéutico , Hiperplasia Prostática/economía , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata/economía , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos
20.
Can J Urol ; 19(2): 6170-5, 2012 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22512959

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Surgical management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) has changed over the past 15 years with newer techniques emerging such as laser therapy that can be used with anticoagulation, an increasing issue with modern patients. We sought to evaluate current trends in procedure utilization based on age, location, type of practice, and experience. We also hoped to determine what factors influence surgeons' decisions to choose or reject particular surgical techniques. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A 90-item on-line survey was sent via electronic mail to the American Urological Association (AUA), Veterans Administration, Society for Government Service Urologists, and Endourological Society. Data concerning utilization of 12 BPH surgical techniques were analyzed and compared to the surgeons' demographics using categorical data analysis and logistic regression. RESULTS: Of approximately 5500 urologists contacted, 600 urologists replied with 570 currently performing BPH surgery. The two procedures that continue to be utilized by urologists are open prostatectomy (OP) at 78% and monopolar transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) at 73%. When stratified by urologist age and year of residency completion, there were no differences in procedure utilization. There were no differences in types of procedures utilized between AUA sections except in the Northeastern AUA section which utilized less monopolar TURP and the New York section which utilized less photoselective vaporization (PVP). Higher volume surgeons were more likely to perform holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP), diode laser vaporization of the prostate, holmium laser ablation of the prostate (HoLAP), and thulium laser ablation. There were no trends for low volume surgeons. There were no differences in types of procedures performed in full time academic versus non-academic settings except for robotic prostatectomy and button TURP which were utilized more often in academic settings. Urologists were more likely to accept a technique that produces good clinical outcomes, is safe in practice, and minimally invasive. Urologists reject procedures most frequently due to preference for another technique or lack of training/equipment. Interestingly, reimbursement/cost issues were never reported as primary reasons for acceptance/rejection of any approach. CONCLUSIONS: Change in technology has led urologists to change their approach to surgical treatment of BPH. OP and monopolar TURP are still the procedures utilized by most urologists, however, laser therapy is emerging as a commonly used technique. As more high-risk patients are treated, laser therapies may become a more popularized technique. Further larger scale studies evaluating surgeon attitudes might clarify how changing technology influences practice patterns.


Asunto(s)
Terapia por Láser/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Prostatectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirugía , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Humanos , Laparoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Láseres de Semiconductores/uso terapéutico , Láseres de Estado Sólido/uso terapéutico , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Prostatectomía/tendencias , Robótica/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata/estadística & datos numéricos , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata/tendencias , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA