To Transplant or Not to Transplant During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic? That Is the Question.

The novel coronavirus disease 2019 has grown to be a global public health emergency. The rapid spread of the infection has raised many questions in the oncohematological scientific community regarding the appropriateness of high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). We here report two cases of patients who received ASCT at our Institute during the epidemic in Italy, affected with Hodgkin lymphoma and germ cell tumor, respectively. The two patients underwent a nasopharyngeal swab for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) on hospital admittance and during the period of bone marrow aplasia. They were attended to exclusively by dedicated health care staff who followed specifically implemented protocols for bedside nursing and care. They completed the procedure without unexpected side effect. Our experience demonstrates how ASCT can be performed safely if procedures are reorganized ad hoc to reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Laser Plume From Human Papillomavirus-Infected Tissue: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Laser procedures are becoming more prevalent across multiple medical specialties for a variety of indications. The plumes created by these lasers have raised concern for the dissemination of an infectious material. OBJECTIVE: To review and summarize the information on viral dissemination in laser plumes available in the literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data Sources A systematic review was performed on English and non-English articles using the PubMed and the Cochrane databases. A manual search of bibliographies from relevant articles was also performed to collect additional studies. STUDY SELECTION: Only articles in the English language with full texts available that pertained to viral particles in laser plumes were included. Data Extraction Two authors performed independent article selections using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. RESULTS: There have been case reports of possible transmission of human papillomavirus (HPV) by inhalation of laser-produced aerosols. Multiple investigators have attempted to recreate this scenario in the laboratory to qualify this risk. Others have conducted clinical experiments to determine the presence of HPV in laser plumes. CONCLUSION: The current body of the literature suggests that laser surgeons are at a risk for HPV exposure by inhalation of laser-derived aerosols. We offer best practice recommendations for laser operators.

Esterilización y/o reuso de elementos de protección personal en la pandemia COVID-19 / Sterilization and reuse of personal protection elements in the COVID-19 pandemic

CONTEXTO CLÍNICO: Los equipos de protección personal (EPP) son usados por el personal de salud para crear una barrera entre el paciente y el ambiente o un objeto, potencialmente contaminados por microorganismos. En enfermedades infecciosas es clave adoptar medidas preventivas de contagio y de mitigación en el manejo comunitario y nosocomial de casos. La enfermedad por el Coronavirus 2019 (COVID­19, por su sigla en inglés Coronavirus Disease 2019) es una enfermedad respiratoria de humanos producida por un nuevo coronavirus identificado con la sigla SARS-CoV-2. El período de incubación de la infección es de 2 a 14 días. La mayor parte de los contagios se producen de persona a persona, siendo altamente transmisible. El cuadro clínico varía desde casos asintomáticos a cuadros febriles con tos y dificultad respiratoria, neumonía y distrés respiratorio. También puede acompañarse de alteraciones gastrointestinales. TECNOLOGÍA: Los equipos de protección personal pueden incluir barbijos, camisolines, mascaras filtrantes de alta eficiencia, máscaras faciales de acetato, guantes, cubrebotas descartables o de tela, y otros. En relación a los barbijos, se consideran aquellos descartables de una o dos capas (mascarillas protectoras), barbijos quirúrgicos (barbijos de 3 o 4 capas o barbijos tipo N95). Según la Administración Nacional de Medicamentos, Alimentos y Tecnología Médica (ANMAT) de la Argentina, los barbijos son productos de polipropileno (PP). La estructura textil producida por entrelazado de fibras y/o filamentos continuos consolidados por medios mecánicos, químicos, térmicos o sus combinaciones y según los gramos de entretejidos, se define su utilidad y tipo de barbijo. OBJETIVO: El objetivo del presente informe es evaluar la evidencia disponible acerca de la eficacia, seguridad y aspectos relacionados con la esterilización y/o reuso de equipos de protección personal en la pandemia por COVID-19. MÉTODOS: Se realizó una búsqueda en las principales bases de datos bibliográficas, en buscadores genéricos de internet, y financiadores de salud. Se priorizó la inclusión de revisiones sistemáticas (RS), ensayos clínicos controlados aleatorizados (ECAs), evaluaciones de tecnologías sanitarias (ETS), evaluaciones económicas, guías de práctica clínica (GPC) y recomendaciones de diferentes sistemas de salud. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron tres ETS, 11 GPC, y un comunicado del fabricante de insumos médicos 3M acerca de la esterilización y/o reuso de elementos de protección personal en la pandemia por COVID-19. CONCLUSIONES: No se encontraron estudios comparativos acerca de la eficacia y/o de la seguridad de la esterilización y/o reuso de los elementos de protección personal (EPP) para el personal de salud en la atención de pacientes con infección por SARS-CoV-2 probable, sospechoso o confirmado, versus no tomar esas medidas. La necesidad de evaluar la posibilidad de esterilización y/o reuso de los EPP se basa en la situación crítica que la pandemia por COVID-19 ha puesto a los servicios de salud mundiales y en la necesidad de la conservación de los recursos necesarios para poder afrontar la pandemia. Los EPP usados por el personal de salud son fabricados para ser descartados después de su uso, luego de un tiempo determinado, según las recomendaciones de los fabricantes. El único estudio encontrado al momento de realizar este informe que evaluaba los métodos más frecuentes de esterilización sugeridos por las guías de buena práctica de manufactura (radiación ultravioleta, calor seco al 70°C, etanol al 70% y peróxido de hidrógeno vaporizado) sugirió que para los barbijos del tipo N95 el único método que podría reducir la contaminación sin afectar su funcionamiento es el peróxido de hidrógeno vaporizado. Las recomendaciones de organismos internacionales como la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS), el Centro de Control de Infecciones estadounidense, de varios ministerios de salud de Europa y Latinoamérica sugieren que, a pesar de no existir evidencia, podrían adoptarse las siguientes medidas: uso extendido (uso más allá del tiempo recomendado por el fabricante) de las máscaras con filtro y barbijos tipo N95 (por hasta cinco días), reprocesamiento seguido de reutilización (después de la limpieza o esterilización) de estos elementos, o bien considerar elementos alternativos en comparación con los elementos estándar recomendados por la OMS. Estos procesos deben garantizar una desinfección y esterilización adecuada, la no toxicidad residual en el material y sobre todo integridad funcional (sistemas de filtrado y sistemas de ajuste). En la extensión del uso de los barbijos de cualquier tipo se sugiere que su uso podría ser continuo o intermitente entre 4 a 8 hs antes de ser desechado en bolsa roja. El ministerio de Salud de Argentina recomienda el descarte de barbijos tipo N95 a los 15 días de su uso o cuando éste se encuentre dañado o manchado. Con respecto a los camisolines se sugiere el reemplazo de telas descartables por telas lavables que soporten hasta 75 ciclos de lavados y desinfección, a cuyo uso se debe sumar el de delantales de plástico descartables.

European interdisciplinary guideline on invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the skin: Part 1. epidemiology, diagnostics and prevention.

Invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is one of the most common cancers in the white populations, accounting for 20% of all cutaneous malignancies. Factors implicated in cSCC etiopathogenesis include ultraviolet radiation exposure and chronic photoaging, age, male sex, immunosuppression, smoking and genetic factors. A collaboration of multidisciplinary experts from the European Dermatology Forum (EDF), the European Association of Dermato-Oncology (EADO) and the European Organisation of Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) was formed to update recommendations on cSCC classification, diagnosis, risk stratification, staging and prevention, based on current literature, staging systems and expert consensus. Common cSCCs are typically indolent tumors, and most have a good prognosis with 5-year cure rates of greater than 90%, and a low rate of metastases (<4%). Further risk stratification into low-risk or high-risk common primary cSCC is recommended based on proposed high-risk factors. Advanced cSCC is classified as locally advanced (lacSCC), and metastatic (mcSCC) including locoregional metastatic or distant metastatic cSCC. Current systems used for staging include the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition, the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) 8th edition, and Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH) system. Physical examination for all cSCCs should include total body skin examination and clinical palpation of lymph nodes, especially of the draining basins. Radiologic imaging such as ultrasound of the regional lymph nodes, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) scans are recommended for staging of high-risk cSCC. Sentinel lymph node biopsy is currently not recommended. Nicotinamide, oral retinoids, and topical 5-FU have been used for the chemoprevention of subsequent cSCCs in high-risk patients but are not routinely recommended. Education about sun protection measures including reducing sun exposure, use of protective clothing, regular use of sunscreens and avoidance of artificial tanning, is recommended.

Equipo de Protección Personal tipo mamelucos o coveralls en pacientes con sospecha o confirmación de infección por COVID-19 en contexto de pandemia / Rompers or coveralls type Personal Protective Equipment in patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 infection in the context of a pandemic

INTRODUCCIÓN: En epidemias de enfermedades altamente infecciosas, como la enfermedad del virus del Ébola o el síndrome respiratorio agudo severo, los trabajadores de la salud tienen un riesgo mucho mayor de infección que la población en general, debido a su contacto con el cuerpo, fluido y aerosoles generados por los pacientes. Las precauciones de contacto medianteequipos de protección personal (EPP) pueden reducir el riesgo, pero existen distintos tipos y no está claro en el contexto de la pandemia por COVID-19 si el mameluco o coverallprotege mejor que otros EPP. Surgen en el Sistema de Salud Pública de la Provincia deNeuquén dudas sobre, aspectos de seguridad, eficacia y conveniencia, cuál es la mejorforma de quitarlo y cómo asegurarse de que los trabajadores de salud los usen según las instrucciones. METODOLOGÍA: Un equipo multidisciplinario sin conflictos de interés realizó una búsqueda bibliográfica no sistemática, clasificó y analizó la evidencia disponible. Priorizó Revisiones Sistemáticas, Guías de Práctica Clínica basadas en la evidencia y recomendaciones de OMS-OPS. RESULTADOS: Una revisión sistemática de Cochrane actualizada no encuentra evidencias contundentes de beneficios de los mamelucos comparado con el EPP standard. La calidad de la evidencia es muy baja. Los documentos actualizados de OMS-OPS no recomiendan los mamelucos como parte del EPP. Algunas sociedades científicas y organimos estatales los mencionan em sus recomendaciones (CDC, GPC China) y otras no los mencionan. Expertos consultados mencionan preocupación por la forma de colocarlo y retirarlo, la necesidad de entrenamiento, la incomodidad que podría ocasionar al trabajador de salud. CONCLUSIONES Y RECOMENDACIONES: La evidencia a favor o en contra de los mamelucos es de muy baja calidad y no arroja resultados significativos. Existirían preocupaciones sobre la incomodidad y la necesidad de entrenamiento para utilizarlo en forma segura por los trabajadores de salud. Los costos y factibilidad de gestionarlo en número adecuado en el contexto actual hacen pensar que su provisión podría ser sumamente dificultosa.

Parametric human modelling to determine body surface area covered by sun-protective clothing.

Solar ultraviolet radiation (UVR) is the main environmental risk-factor for cancer of the skin. Sun-protective clothing provides a physical barrier that reduces the UVR dose reaching the skin and European and Australian standards for sun-protective clothing set minimum clothing coverage requirements. Body Surface Area Coverage by clothing (BSAC) is calculated by means of indirect or direct methods, which are laborious and do not support computer-based apparel design. To support the sun-safe specification and design of garments, parametric digital human models and protective clothing mesh covering the minimum Body Surface Area specified in AS/NZS 4399:2017, were created making use of MakeHuman v1.1.1 and Blender software. The Whole Body Surface Area (WBSA) and the BSAC were calculated employing code developed in Blender. Thus, different groups of subjects were analysed to explore BSAC. The method assists in the evaluation of exposed body areas in a wider spectrum of different occupations. Practitioner summary: Sun-protective clothing provides a physical barrier that reduces the UVR dose reaching the skin's surface. Body Surface Area Coverage (BSAC) by clothing is an important determinant of the sun protective capabilities of a garment. In this study, BSAC is calculated using parametric digital human modelling. Abbreviation: UVR: (Solar) ultraviolet radiation; DHM: digital human modeling; BSA: body surface area; BSAC: body surface area coverage (by clothing); BSANC: body surface area not covered (by clothing); WBSA: whole body surface area; BCC: basal cell carcinoma; SCC: squamous cell carcinoma; UPF: ultraviolet protection factor; GPF: garment protection factor.

Recommendations from the Brazilian Society of Nephrology regarding the use of cloth face coverings, by chronic kidney patients in dialysis, during the new coronavirus pandemic (Covid-19) / Recomendações da Sociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia quanto ao uso de máscaras de pano por pacientes renais crônicos em diálise, durante a pandemia pelo novo coronavírus (Covid-19)

ABSTRACT These recommendations were created after the publication of informative note 3/2020- CGGAP/DESF/SAPS/MS, of April 4, 2020, in which the Brazilian Ministry of Health recommended the use of a cloth mask by the population, in public places. Taking into account the necessary prioritization of the provision of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for patients with suspected or confirmed disease, as well as for healthcare professionals, the SBN is favorable concerning the wear of cloth masks by chronic kidney patients in dialysis, in public settings, except in the dialysis setting. The present recommendations have eleven items, related to this rationale, the procedures, indications, contraindications, as well as appropriate fabrics for the mask, and hygiene care to be adopted. These recommendations may change, at any time, in the light of new evidence.

RESUMO As presentes recomendações foram elaboradas após a publicação da Nota Informativa nº 3/2020 CGGAP/DESF/SAPS/MS, em 4 de abril de 2020, na qual o Ministério da Saúde recomenda o uso de máscara de pano por toda a população, em locais públicos. Levando-se em consideração a necessária priorização do fornecimento de Equipamentos de Proteção Individual (EPIs) para pacientes com suspeita ou confirmação da doença, assim como para profissionais de saúde, a Sociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia (SBN) posicionou-se favoravelmente ao uso de máscaras de pano por pacientes renais crônicos em diálise, em ambientes públicos, exceto no ambiente da diálise. As presentes recomendações englobam onze itens relativos ao que é racional para posicionamento, procedimentos, indicações, contraindicações, assim como tecidos apropriados para confecção e os cuidados de higiene a serem adotados. Essas recomendações poderão ser modificadas a qualquer momento, à luz de novas evidências.

Evaluation of Disposable Protective Garments against Isocyanate Permeation and Penetration from Polyurethane Anticorrosion Coatings.

BACKGROUND: Polyurethanes are a class of isocyanate-based organic coatings commonly used to control corrosion on high-value metallic structures. Despite their widespread use, dermal exposure to these isocyanate-containing coatings presents a significant occupational health risk to workers, including the development of allergic and irritant contact dermatitis and systemic sensitization. At present, little is known about the effectiveness of the protective garments commonly used to prevent dermal exposure to polyurethane coatings in construction trades. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to measure the permeation and penetration of isocyanates from polyurethane anticorrosion coatings though a selection of protective garments. In addition, a standardized spray procedure using a fixed-position spraying technique was evaluated as an option to minimize variability in coating application. METHODS: Five disposable garment materials were evaluated for resistance to isocyanates during this study: latex gloves (0.076 mm), nitrile gloves (0.078 mm), Tyvek coveralls (0.105 mm), polypropylene/polyethylene (PP/PE) coveralls (0.116 mm), and a cotton t-shirt (0.382 mm). A permeation test cell system was used to evaluate each garment material against two products: a polyurethane zinc-rich primer based on 4,4'-methylene diphenyl diisocyanate and an aliphatic finish coating based on prepolymers of 1,6-hexamethylene diisocyanate. Glass fiber filters pretreated with 1-(9-anthracenylmethyl)piperazine were used to collect penetrating isocyanates during the 120-min test period, which were analyzed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Polytetrafluoroethylene loading filters were sprayed in series with permeation test cells and analyzed gravimetrically to assess the homogeneity of coating application. RESULTS: The latex gloves demonstrated the highest rate of isocyanate permeation of all evaluated garments during testing with both coatings (primer: 27.38 ng cm-2 min-1; finish coating: 7.39 ng cm-2 min-1). Nitrile gloves were much more resistant than latex gloves (primer: 1.89 ng cm-2 min-1; finish coating: 1.26 ng cm-2 min-1) and were not permeated by the finish coating until after 15 min. The PP/PE coverall provided the most consistent resistance to both coatings (primer: 0.08 ng cm-2 min-1; finish coating: 1.27 ng cm-2 min-1), whereas the Tyvek coverall was readily permeated by the primer (primer: 3.47 ng cm-2 min-1; finish coating: 0.87 ng cm-2 min-1). The cotton t-shirt was rapidly permeated by the primer during the first 5 min of exposure (primer: 146.65 ng cm-2 min-1; finish coating: 4.64 ng cm-2 min-1). In addition, the fixed-position spraying technique used during this study demonstrated a significant reduction in loading variability within each batch of test cells when compared to manual spray application. CONCLUSION: Nitrile gloves demonstrated superior resistance to both isocyanate-containing coatings in comparison to latex gloves. Although both coverall materials were resistant to permeating isocyanate within the established thresholds, the PP/PE coverall provided more consistent resistance to both coatings. Owing to the cotton t-shirt's high rate of penetration with both coatings, it is recommended only as a secondary barrier. Study results showed that the use of fixed-position spray techniques provided consistent and reproducible results within each batch of test cells. Additional test design modifications are necessary to further reduce variability between batches and ensure more consistent coating thickness.

Lightweight Lead Aprons: The Emperor's New Clothes in the Angiography Suite?

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to determine whether lead containing and lead free composite garments in current use provide the level of radiation protection stated by manufacturers. METHODS: Fifteen garments, produced by five different manufacturers using eight different composites, were randomly selected for testing from four hospitals in South Australia. Labelling, material composition, design, and condition of the garments were assessed by direct garment examination, garment label, and product information. Garment attenuation was tested in a simulated angiography suite using a Siemens Ysio Max digital Xray machine. The front and back panels of each garment were tested under direct beam at 100 kVp. A Perspex phantom was used to simulate the density and scatter properties of the human abdomen. The front panels of each garment were tested under scattered radiation at Xray tube voltages of 50 and 70 kVp. RESULTS: Forty-seven per cent of front panels and 90% of back panels provided lower lead equivalence than claimed by the manufacturer. Twenty per cent of front panels and 62% of back panels tested did not meet the minimum International Electrotechnical Commission requirements for angiographic use. There was a 38 fold difference in front panel performance of garments to scatter radiation, which were all labelled 0.5 mm lead equivalence. 56% of garments had differences in scatter transmission of at least 49% when tested at 50 and 70 kVp. CONCLUSION: The results show that lead containing and lead free composite garments probably provide less radiation protection than manufacturer stated lead equivalence. The demonstrated wide variations in attenuation of scatter radiation are greater than previously reported. It was found that most garments failed to comply with labelling standards. The study highlights challenges in radiation shielding and the need to identify composites that consistently provide better attenuation per unit weight than lead.

New barrier attire regulations in the operating room: A mandate without basis?

BACKGROUND: Recent AHRQ/Joint Commission guidelines mandate additional barrier attire for all operating room personnel to target infection. The scientific basis for this is unclear. STUDY DESIGN: Patients undergoing abdominal surgery at our institution were identified from institutional NSQIP database before and after March 2016, when guidelines were implemented. Patient-level variables were compared for the pre- and post-implementation groups. Multivariable regression evaluated associations between implementation and surgical site infection (SSI) and other outcomes. RESULTS: 1122 patients (including 60.9% laparoscopic and 16.4% bowel resection procedures) were included. There were 607 patients post-implementation and 515 pre-implementation; cohorts were similar in risk factors for SSI. Fifty-seven patients developed SSI. On multivariable analysis, laparoscopy, bowel resection and operating duration, but not barrier attire, were associated with SSI. Implementation of attire did not significantly impact SSI (p = 0.4), hospital readmission (p = 0.4), or reoperation (p = 0.9). CONCLUSIONS: These data question the rationale for the new more stringent operating room attire guidelines which burden hospitals with additional cost, time and resources, and could detract efforts to target important factors that really influence outcomes.

RADIATION DOSES TO ANAESTHETISTS DURING PROSTATIC ARTERY EMBOLIZATION INTERVENTIONAL PROCEDURES.

The objective of this study was to assess the radiation doses received by anaesthetists from prostatic artery embolization (PAE) procedures. Ten PAE procedures conducted in a reference hospital in the city of Recife, Brazil were investigated. Occupational dosimetry was performed using thermoluminescent dosemeters which were located next to the eyes, close to the thyroid (over the shielding), on the thorax (under the apron), on the wrist and on the feet of the physician's body. The results showed that the anaesthetist's feet received the highest doses followed by the eyes and the hands. In some complex PAE procedures the doses received by anaesthetists on the lens of the eyes and the effective dose were higher than those received by the main operator due to the anaesthetist's close position to the patient's table and the use of oblique projections. The personal dose equivalent Hp(3) per procedure for the anaesthetist's right eyebrow ranged from 20.2 µSv to 568.3 µSv. This result shows that anaesthetists assisting PAE procedures can exceeds the annual eye lens dose limit of 20 mSv recommended by the ICRP with only one procedure per week if radiation protection measures are not implemented during procedures.

A European survey on the regulatory status for the estimation of the effective dose and the equivalent dose to the lens of the eye when radiation protection garments are used.

Following the proposal of the ICRP for the reduction of the dose limit for the lens of the eye, which has been adopted by the International Atomic Energy Agency and the European Council, concerns have been raised about the implementation of proper dose monitoring methods as defined in national regulations, and about the harmonisation between European countries. The European Radiation Dosimetry Group organised a survey at the end of 2017, through a web questionnaire, regarding national dose monitoring regulations. The questions were related to: double dosimetry, algorithms for the estimation of the effective dose, methodology for the determination of the equivalent dose to the lens of the eye and structure of the national dose registry. The results showed that more than 50% of the countries that responded to the survey have legal requirements about the number and the position of dosemeters used for estimation of the effective dose when radiation protection garments are used. However, in only five out of 26 countries are there nationally approved algorithms for the estimation of the effective dose. In 14 out of 26 countries there is a legal requirement to estimate the dose to the lens of the eye. All of the responding countries use some kind of national database for storing individual monitoring data but in only 12 out of 26 countries are the estimated effective dose values stored. The personal dose equivalent at depth 3 mm is stored in the registry of only seven out of 26 countries. From the survey, performed just before the implementation of the European Basic Safety Standards Directive, it is concluded that national occupational exposure frameworks require intensive and immediate work under the coordination of the competent authorities to bring them into line with the latest basic safety standards and achieve harmonisation between European countries.

[Stem cell transplantation unit: Guidelines from the francophone Society of bone marrow transplantation and cellular therapy (SFGM-TC)]. / Unité de greffe : recommandations de la Société francophone de greffe de moelle et de thérapie cellulaire (SFGM-TC).

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is part of the standard of care for many hematological diseases. Over the last decades, significant advances in patient and donor selection, conditioning regimens as well as supportive care of patients undergoing allogeneic HCT leading to improved overall survival have been made. In view of many new treatment options in cellular and molecular targeted therapies, the place of allogeneic transplantation in therapy concepts must be reviewed. Most aspects of HCT are well standardized by national guidelines or laws as well as by certification labels such as FACT-JACIE. However, the requirements for human resources, construction and layout of a unit treating patients during the transplantation procedure and for different complications are not well defined. Here, we describe the process of planning a transplant unit in order to open a discussion that could lead to more precise guidelines in the field of personnel and infrastructural requirements for hospitals caring for people with severe immunosuppression.

The art and science of surgery: Do the data support the banning of surgical skull caps?

BACKGROUND: Recommendations of the Joint Commission discourage the use of surgical skull caps in favor of bouffant or helmet headwear; however, data supporting such recommendations are limited and have been questioned in recent studies, as well as by our departmental and hospital leadership. At the end of December 2015, surgical caps were removed from our institution with the theoretic goal of decreasing surgical site infections. We aimed to assess the impact of this intervention on surgical site infection occurrence at our institution. METHODS: Using our institutional American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program General and Vascular procedure-targeted data, we identified patients undergoing any surgical procedure classified as clean or clean-contaminated during a 12-month period before and after implementation of the surgical headwear policy. Patients without complete 30-day follow-up were excluded. Cases with active infection at the time of operation were excluded. Vascular surgery operations were excluded because of the implementation of a separate intervention to decrease surgical site infections during the study period. Patients were grouped according to timing of the operation in relation to the policy change (12 months before or after). Descriptive statistics focused on proportions and adjusted logistic regression models were used to investigate the association of alternative headwear use with any type of surgical site infection. Models were adjusted for potential confounders that included demographics and clinical characteristics (age, sex, race or ethnicity, obesity, diabetes, steroid use, smoking status, cancer, urgency of the operation, and wound classification). RESULTS: A total of 1,901 patients underwent 1,950 procedures during the study period, with 767 (40%) before and 1,183 (60%) after the headwear policy measure was adopted. The most common procedures overall were colectomy (18%), pancreatectomy (13.5%), and ventral hernia repair (8.9%). The overall rate of any surgical site infection was 5.4%, with no difference before and after policy implementation (5.3% versus 5.5%; P = .81). Multivariate analysis controlling for age, sex, race or ethnicity, obesity, diabetes, smoking status, steroid use, cancer diagnosis, and type of wound classification showed no association between implementation of this new policy and surgical site infections occurrence (odds ratio 1.12 [95% confidence interval 0.73-1.71]; P = .59). CONCLUSION: In our institution, the strict implementation of bouffant or helmet headwear, with removal of skull caps from the operating room, was not associated with decreased surgical site infections for clean and clean-contaminated cases. Further evidence is required to assess the validity of this headwear guideline of the Joint Commission and support nationwide implementation of this policy.

Testing of Disposable Protective Garments Against Isocyanate Permeation From Spray Polyurethane Foam Insulation.

Background: Diisocyanates (isocyanates), including methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI), are the primary reactive components of spray polyurethane foam (SPF) insulation. They are potent immune sensitizers and a leading cause of occupational asthma. Skin exposure to isocyanates may lead to both irritant and allergic contact dermatitis and possibly contribute to systemic sensitization. More than sufficient evidence exists to justify the use of protective garments to minimize skin contact with aerosolized and raw isocyanate containing materials during SPF applications. Studies evaluating the permeation of protective garments following exposure to SPF insulation do not currently exist. Objectives: To conduct permeation testing under controlled conditions to assess the effectiveness of common protective gloves and coveralls during SPF applications using realistic SPF product formulations. Methods: Five common disposable garment materials [disposable latex gloves (0.07 mm thickness), nitrile gloves (0.07 mm), vinyl gloves (0.07 mm), polypropylene coveralls (0.13 mm) and Tyvek coveralls (0.13 mm)] were selected for testing. These materials were cut into small pieces and assembled into a permeation test cell system and coated with a two-part slow-rise spray polyurethane foam insulation. Glass fiber filters (GFF) pretreated with 1-(9-anthracenylmethyl)piperazine) (MAP) were used underneath the garment to collect permeating isocyanates. GFF filters were collected at predetermined test intervals between 0.75 and 20.00 min and subsequently analyzed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. For each garment material, we assessed (i) the cumulative concentration of total isocyanate, including phenyl isocyanate and three MDI isomers, that effectively permeated the material over the test time; (ii) estimated breakthrough detection time, average permeation rate, and standardized breakthrough time; from which (iii) recommendations were developed for the use of similar protective garments following contamination by two-component spray polyurethane foam systems and the limitations of such protective garments were identified. Results: Each type of protective garment material demonstrated an average permeation rate well below the ASTM method F-739 standardized breakthrough rate threshold of 100.0 ng/cm2 min-1. Disposable latex gloves displayed the greatest total isocyanate permeation rate (4.11 ng/cm2 min-1), followed by the vinyl and nitrile gloves, respectively. The Tyvek coverall demonstrated a greater average rate of isocyanate permeation than the polypropylene coveralls. Typical isocyanate loading was in the range of 900 to 15,000 ng MDI/cm2. Conclusion: Permeation test data collected during this study indicated that each type of protective garment evaluated, provided a considerable level of protection (i.e. 10-110-fold reduction from the level of direct exposure) against the isocyanate component of the SPF insulation mixture. Nitrile gloves and polypropylene coveralls demonstrated the lowest rate of permeation and the lowest cumulative permeation of total isocyanate for each garment type.

A Novel Adjustable Concept for Permeable Gas/Vapor Protective Clothing: Balancing Protection and Thermal Strain.

Armed forces typically have personal protective clothing (PPC) in place to offer protection against chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear (CBRN) agents. The regular soldier is equipped with permeable CBRN-PPC. However, depending on the operational task, these PPCs pose too much thermal strain to the wearer, which results in a higher risk of uncompensable heat stress. This study investigates the possibilities of adjustable CBRN-PPC, consisting of different layers that can be worn separately or in combination with each other. This novel concept aims to achieve optimization between protection and thermal strain during operations. Two CBRN-PPC (protective) layers were obtained from two separate manufacturers: (i) a next-to-skin (NTS) and (ii) a low-burden battle dress uniform (protective BDU). In addition to these layers, a standard (non-CBRN protective) BDU (sBDU) was also made available. The effect of combining clothing layers on the levels of protection were investigated with a Man-In-Simulant Test. Finally, a mechanistic numerical model was employed to give insight into the thermal burden of the evaluated CBRN-PPC concepts. Combining layers results in substantially higher protection that is more than the sum of the individual layers. Reducing the airflow on the protective layer closest to the skin seems to play an important role in this, since combining the NTS with the sBDU also resulted in substantially higher protection. As expected, the thermal strain posed by the different clothing layer combinations decreases as the level of protection decreases. This study has shown that the concept of adjustable protection and thermal strain through multiple layers of CBRN-PPC works. Adjustable CBRN-PPC allows for optimization of the CBRN-PPC in relation to the threat level, thermal environment, and tasks at hand in an operational setting.

The effect of moisture content within multilayer protective clothing on protection from radiation and steam.

The moisture from skin sweat and atmospheric water affects the thermal protective performance provided by multilayer protective clothing. Four levels of moisture content were selected to evaluate the impact of moisture on thermal protection under dry (thermal radiation) and wet (thermal radiation and low-pressure steam) heat exposure. Also, the role of moisture and its relationship with exposure time were analyzed based on skin heat flux and Henriques integral value. The addition of moisture to a fabric system was found to result in differences in second-degree and third-degree skin burn times. When moisture is added to a fabric system, it both acts as a thermal conductor to present a negative effect and provides a positive effect owing to thermal storage of water and evaporative heat loss. The positive or negative effects of moisture are mainly dependent on the thermal exposure time, the moisture content and the presence of hot steam.

A comprehensive approach to evaluating and classifying sun-protective clothing.

BACKGROUND: National standards for clothing designed to protect the wearer from the harmful effects of solar ultraviolet radiation (UVR) have been implemented in Australia/New Zealand, Europe and the U.S.A. Industry standards reflect the need to protect the skin by covering a considerable proportion of the potentially exposed body surface area (BSA) and by reducing UVR-transmission through fabric (the Ultraviolet Protection Factor; UPF). OBJECTIVES: This research aimed to develop a new index for rating sun-protective clothing that incorporates the BSA coverage of the garment in addition to the UPF of the fabric. METHODS: A mannequin model was fixed to an optical bench and marked with horizontal lines at 1-cm intervals. An algorithm (the Garment Protector Factor; GPF) was developed based on the number of lines visible on the clothed vs. unclothed mannequin and the UPF of the garment textile. This data was collected in 2015/16 and analysed in 2016. RESULTS: The GPF weights fabric UPF by BSA coverage above the minimum required by international sun-protective clothing standards for upper-body, lower-body and full-body garments. The GPF increases with BSA coverage of the garment and fabric UPF. Three nominal categories are proposed for the GPF: 0 ≤ GPF < 3 for garments that 'meet' minimum standards; 3 ≤ GPF < 6 for garments providing 'good' sun protection; and GPF ≥ 6 indicating 'excellent' protection. CONCLUSIONS: Adoption of the proposed rating scheme should encourage manufacturers to design sun-protective garments that exceed the minimum standard for BSA coverage, with positive implications for skin cancer prevention, consumer education and sun-protection awareness.

Lead Apron Inspection Using Infrared Light: A Model Validation Study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate defect detection in radiation protective apparel, typically called lead aprons, using infrared (IR) thermal imaging. The use of IR lighting eliminates the need for access to x-ray-emitting equipment and radiation dose to the inspector. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The performance of radiation workers was prospectively assessed using both a tactile inspection and the IR inspection with a lead apron phantom over a 2-month period. The phantom was a modified lead apron with a series of nine holes of increasing diameter ranging from 2 to 35 mm in accordance with typical rejection criteria. Using the tactile method, a radiation worker would feel for the defects in the lead apron. For the IR inspection, a 250-W IR light source was used to illuminate the lead apron phantom; an IR camera detected the transmitted radiation. The radiation workers evaluated two stills from the IR camera. RESULTS: From the 31 participants inspecting the lead apron phantom with the tactile method, only 2 participants (6%) correctly discovered all 9 holes and 1 participant reported a defect that was not there; 10 of the 20 participants (50%) correctly identified all 9 holes using the IR method. Using a weighted average, 5.4 defects were detected with the tactile method and 7.5 defects were detected with the IR method. CONCLUSION: IR light can penetrate an apron's protective outer fabric and illuminate defects below the current standard rejection size criteria. The IR method improves defect detectability as compared with the tactile method.