Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 612
Filtrar
1.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord ; 24(1): 290, 2024 Jun 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38822250

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Little is known about patient profile changes in medical facilities in our country, leading to this study to describe and compare patient profiles in 2010 and 2022. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study with new outpatients aged 15 years and more seen in the cardiology department of the UH-GT. Measurements included height, weight and body mass index (BMI). Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were recorded. Quantitative data are presented as the mean with standard deviation, and categorical one as proportions. Statistical tests were the t test to compare means and chi-test for categorical variables. The level of significance was set to 0.05. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 515 new patients (199 in 2010 and 316 in 2022) with 59.1% female in 2010 and 60.1% in 2022 (p = 0.821). We noticed an increase in hypertension (59.1-71.8%, p = 0.003) and a decrease in tobacco smoking (from 13 to 05.4%, p = 0.002) and stroke (from 05.8 to 02.2%, p = 0.033). Height increased significantly from 1.59 m to 1.66 m, p = 0.002. SBP and DBP showed significant decreases in their means from 155.43 to 144.97 mmHg, p = < 0.001 for SBP and from 95.53 to 89.02 mmHg, p = < 0.001 for DBP. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiovascular risk factors showed different trends with decreasing tobacco smoking, similar to systolic and diastolic blood pressure, albeit with an increase in hypertension prevalence. Other CVrf values increased. Awareness campaigns must be reinforced and maintained to obtain their decrease.


Asunto(s)
Presión Sanguínea , Servicio de Cardiología en Hospital , Hospitales Universitarios , Hipertensión , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Anciano , Hipertensión/diagnóstico , Hipertensión/fisiopatología , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Factores de Tiempo , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto Joven , Fumar Tabaco/efectos adversos , Fumar Tabaco/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/fisiopatología , Medición de Riesgo
2.
Ann Card Anaesth ; 27(1): 24-31, 2024 Jan 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38722117

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Antibiotics resistance is an paramount threat affecting the whole world but nowhere situation is as gloomy as in India. No study till date regarding epidemiology of hospital acquired infections in coronary care units(CCU) and cardiology wards from India. From Indian perspective it is the first observational study to analyse microbiological profile and antibiotic resistance in CCU. The purpose of this observational study is to explore the epidemiology and importance of infections in CCU patients. METHODOLOGY: After ethics committee approval, the records of all patients who were admitted in coronary care units, adult and pediatric cardiology wards surgery between January 2020 and December 2021 were reviewed retrospectively. The type of organism,source of infection ,age wise distribution and seasonal variability among patients who developed hospital acquired infection (HAI) were determined. RESULTS: 271 patients developed microbiologically documented HAI during from January 2020 to December 2021. Maximum number of organisms(78/271 28.78%) are isolated from urinary samples ,followed by blood stream(60/271 22.14%) and Endotracheal tube (54/271 19.92%). Acinetobacter baumanii (53/271, 19.5%) being the most common isolate among all the samples taken . Acinetobacter was the most frequent pathogens isolated in patients with LRTI and blood stream infection while E. coli was from urinary tract infection . In the adult population, infection with E. coli(24.6%) is the most common followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (12.8%) and Acinetobacter baumanii (10.1%). In the pediatric population Acinetobacter baumanii (38.6%%) is the most common followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (20.5%) and Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus, MRSA (6.8%). Commonly used antibiotics eg ciprofloxacin,ceftazidime and amikacin were found to be resistant against the top three isolates. CONCLUSION: Urinary tract was the most common site of infection and Gram-negative bacilli, the most common pathogens in adult as well as pediatric population. Antibiotic resistance was maximum with commonly isolated microorganisms.


Asunto(s)
Unidades de Cuidados Coronarios , Infección Hospitalaria , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Unidades de Cuidados Coronarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Adulto , Niño , Masculino , Femenino , India/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adolescente , Preescolar , Lactante , Anciano , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Adulto Joven , Farmacorresistencia Microbiana , Servicio de Cardiología en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos
3.
J. nurs. health ; 12(2): 2212221815, Abr.2022.
Artículo en Portugués | LILACS, BDENF - Enfermería | ID: biblio-1415892

RESUMEN

Objetivo: analisar os registros de enfermagem, no contexto do paciente cardiológico na emergência. Método: estudo quantitativo, descritivo, realizado de maio a junho de 2018, por meio da avaliação dos registros eletrônicos de enfermagem de uma emergência cardiológica, utilizando roteiro pré-elaborado. Análise por estatística simples descritiva. Resultados: dos 140 registros de enfermagem, identificou-se 53 itens: 46(86,79%) referentes às necessidades psicobiológicas, 6(11,32%) psicossociais e 1(1,89%) psicoespiritual. Encontraram-se 22 diagnósticos de enfermagem, com destaque no risco de infecção 90(64,28%), processo cardíaco prejudicado 78(55,71%) e risco de alterações cardiovasculares/hemodinâmica 34(24,28%). E 14 intervenções de enfermagem, incluindo: monitorar sinais vitais 20(14,28%); avaliar dor 16(11,42%); manter ambiente calmo e tranquilo 15(10,71%). Conclusão: os registros apresentam deficiência quanto às características dos pacientes cardíacos, intervenções de enfermagem superficiais e desconexas aos diagnósticos de enfermagem mais frequentes.(AU)


Objective: to analyze the nursing records in the context of cardiac patients in the emergency room. Method: quantitative, descriptive study, carried out from May to June 2018, through the evaluation of electronic nursing records of a cardiology emergency, using a pre-prepared script. Simple descriptive statistical analysis. Results: from 140 nursing records, 53 items were identified: 46(86.79%) referring to psychobiological needs, 6(11.32%) psychosocial and 1(1.89%) psychospiritual. 22 nursing diagnoses were found, with emphasis on the risk of infection 90(64.28%), impaired cardiac process 78(55.71%) and risk of cardiovascular/hemodynamic changes 34(24.28%). And 14 nursing interventions, including: monitoring vital signs 20(14.28%); assess pain 16(11.42%); maintain a calm and peaceful environment 15(10.71%). Conclusion: the records show deficiencies regarding the characteristics of cardiac patients, superficial nursing interventions and disconnected from the most frequent nursing diagnoses.(AU)


Objetivo: analizar los registros de enfermería en contexto de pacientes cardíacos en urgencias. Método: estudio cuantitativo, descriptivo, realizado de mayo a junio de 2018, mediante la evaluación de registros electrónicos de enfermería de una emergencia cardiológica, utilizando un guión preestablecido. Análisis estadístico descriptivo simple. Resultados: 140 registros de enfermería se identificaron 53 ítems: 46(86,79%) necesidades psicobiológicas, 6(11,32%) psicosociales, 1(1,89%) psicoespiritual. Encontraron 22 diagnósticos de enfermería, con énfasis en riesgo de infección 90(64,28%), deterioro del proceso cardíaco 78(55,71%), riesgo de alteraciones cardiovasculares/hemodinámicas 34(24,28%). 14 intervenciones de enfermería, que incluyen: seguimiento de signos vitales 20(14,28%); evaluar dolor 16(11,42%); mantener ambiente tranquilo y pacífico 15(10,71%). Conclusión: los registros muestran deficiencias en cuanto a las características de los pacientes cardíacos, intervenciones de enfermería superficiales y desconectadas de los diagnósticos de enfermería más frecuentes.(AU)


Asunto(s)
Registros de Enfermería , Enfermería , Servicio de Cardiología en Hospital , Urgencias Médicas , Proceso de Enfermería
6.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord ; 21(1): 600, 2021 12 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34915839

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Despite established guidelines on secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease, practical implementation of treatment targets is deficient even in high-income countries. This study compared long-term hospital-based treatment with follow-up at primary health care regarding new cardiovascular events and achievement of treatment targets. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial at Sørlandet Hospital, Norway 2007-2021 included patients hospitalized due to myocardial infarction (n = 760) or after scheduled percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (n = 677) or coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 103). Patients were randomized to hospital-based secondary preventive care with consultations 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year after the index event and annually for up to 5 years, or follow-up at primary health care. Final data was collected after 10 years and hazard ratios were calculated using Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: Composite endpoint-free survival due to a lower rate of PCI improved in patients with hospital-based follow-up (n = 788) compared to patients followed-up at primary health care (n = 752) (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.66-0.96; p = 0.02) but all-cause mortality was not reduced (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.59-1.56; p = 0.86). At 1 year, LDL-cholesterol (2.1 [SD 0.7] versus 2.3 [SD 0.8] mmol/l; p < 0.001) and systolic blood pressure (132 [SD 16] versus 142 [SD 20] mm/Hg; p < 0.001) were lower in the hospital-based group, and the differences remained significant during the first 5 years. Other secondary preventive measures (smoking cessation, physical activity, body weight, glucose control, drug adherence) did not differ. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term hospital-based secondary preventive follow-up improved composite endpoint-free survival, but not mortality. Substantial risk factors remained unaddressed. The beneficial effects on blood pressure and LDL-cholesterol disappeared after annual consultations ceased. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00679237) May 16, 2008.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Cardiología en Hospital , Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Prevención Secundaria , Anciano , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/efectos adversos , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/mortalidad , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/mortalidad , Femenino , Factores de Riesgo de Enfermedad Cardiaca , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Noruega , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/mortalidad , Atención Primaria de Salud , Recurrencia , Derivación y Consulta , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
J. health med. sci. (Print) ; 7(3): 143-149, jul.-sept. 2021.
Artículo en Español | LILACS | ID: biblio-1381356

RESUMEN

Las altas tasas de letalidad y mortalidad a causa del paro cardiorespiratorio por fibrilación ventricular son considerados un problema de salud pública, cobrando gran relevancia la posibilidad de que sean revertidos rápidamente con la presencia de profesionales capacitados o por personal "lego" actualizados en reanimación cardiopulmonar. El objetivo del presente artículo de revisión fue analizar las nuevas recomendaciones de la American Heart Association para reanimación cardiopulmonar y atención cardiovascular de emergencia para el año 2020.


High rates of lethality and mortality due to ventricular fibrillation cardiorespiratory arrest are considered a public health problem, Thus, the possibility of reversed quickly by trained professionals or updated "lego" staff in cardiopulmonary resuscitation is taking great relevance. The objective of this review article was to discuss the New Recommendations of the American Heart Association for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care for 2020.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Recién Nacido , Niño , Adulto , Cardiología/normas , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/normas , Servicio de Cardiología en Hospital/normas , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/normas , Paro Cardíaco/terapia , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/efectos adversos , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/normas , Apoyo Vital Cardíaco Avanzado/normas , American Heart Association , Paro Cardíaco/diagnóstico , Paro Cardíaco/fisiopatología
9.
Rev. chil. cardiol ; 40(2): 121-126, ago. 2021. tab, graf
Artículo en Español | LILACS | ID: biblio-1388087

RESUMEN

RESUMEN: Introducción: El Stent-Save a Life! (SSL) LATAM working group diseñó una encuesta para objetivar la reducción de la actividad de los laboratorios de hemodinamia en Latinoamérica durante la pandemia COVID-19. Ante la amenaza de nuevos confinamientos en Chile, nos propusimos objetivar las consecuencias de la primera ola de contagios en nuestra actividad. Objetivos: Discutir la repercusión de la pandemia en la cardiología intervencional en Chile. Métodos: El grupo SSL realizó una encuesta telemática a todos los países de Latinoamérica incluido Chile. Se registraron las coronariografías (CAG), intervenciones coronarias percutáneas (ACTP) e intervenciones estructurales, comparando dos períodos determinados por el confinamiento por la pandemia, cada uno de dos semanas. Pre-COVID-19: período previo al confinamiento, y COVID-19: período durante el confinamiento. Se analizan, a partir de esta encuesta, los resultados aplicados a nuestro país. Resultados: Se obtuvo respuesta de trece centros. Hubo una reducción en el número global de procedimientos entre período Pre-COVID-19 y COVID-19 de un 65,1%. Se reportó una disminución de 67% en las CAG, de un 59,4% en las ACTP y de un 92% en los procedimientos terapéuticos estructurales. Entre ambos períodos se redujo la consulta por Síndrome Coronario Agudo por elevación del segmento ST (SCACEST) en 40,8%. Conclusiones: En nuestro país se objetivó una reducción marcada de la actividad asistencial de la cardiología intervencional durante la pandemia COVID-19 y una disminución significativa en el número de pacientes tratados por SCACEST. Los resultados de nuestro país son similares a los reportados por países de Latinoamérica, Europa y Norteamérica.


ABSTRACT: Background: The Stent-Save a Life! (SSL) LATAM working group designed a survey to demonstrate the reduction in the activity of cardiac catheterization laboratories in Latin America during the COVID-19 pandemic. Considering the risk of a new confinement in Chile, we decided to assess the impact of the first wave of contagions on our activity. Aims: To discuss the repercussion of the COVID-19 pandemic on the activity of interventional cardiology in Chile. Methods: The SSL group conducted a telematic survey in all Latin American countries. Coronary angiography, coronary interventions (PCI) and structural interventions were registered, comparing two periods of two weeks duration each: before and during COVID-19 confinement. Results obtained in Chile are analyzed. Results: Thirteen centers in Chile answered the survey. There was an overall decrease of 65.1% in the number of procedures between the pre and the post COVID-19 periods. Coronary angiographies decreased 67%, PCI 59.4% and therapeutical structural procedures 92%. The reduction in acute coronary syndrome with ST segment elevation (STEMI) was 40,8% between periods. Conclusions: In Chile, a significant reduction in healthcare activity related to interventional cardiology and a significant decrease in the number of patients treated with STEMI was observed during the COVID-19 pandemic. The results are similar to those reported by Latin American, European and North American countries.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardiovasculares/estadística & datos numéricos , Cardiología/estadística & datos numéricos , COVID-19 , Radiografía Intervencional , Chile , Cuarentena , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Angiografía Coronaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Cardiología en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Pandemias , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/estadística & datos numéricos , Laboratorios Clínicos/estadística & datos numéricos
10.
Medisan ; 25(4): 868-881, 2021. tab
Artículo en Español | LILACS, CUMED | ID: biblio-1340210

RESUMEN

Introducción: El tema de la tensión arterial en niños y adolescentes ha cobrado un marcado interés en los últimos años, debido al incremento de su prevalencia en este grupo poblacional Objetivo: Evaluar la prescripción de medicamentos en niños y adolescentes con hipertensión arterial atendidos en el Hospital Infantil Norte Dr. Juan de la Cruz Martínez Maceira de Santiago de Cuba. Métodos: Se realizó una investigación observacional, descriptiva y transversal, que se corresponde con un estudio de utilización de medicamentos, del tipo indicación-prescripción, esquemas terapéuticos y consecuencias prácticas, de 39 pacientes con diagnóstico de hipertensión arterial atendidos en el Servicio de Cardiología del mencionado centro hospitalario, desde enero hasta diciembre de 2018, quienes cumplieron los criterios de selección establecidos. Se utilizaron variables principales (prescripción y reacciones adversas) y de control (edad, color de la piel, sexo y factores de riesgo). Resultados: Predominaron el sexo masculino (79,4 %), el grupo etario de 15-18 años (66,6 %), la hipertensión arterial primaria (estadio 1), los pacientes de piel negra y la obesidad como factor de riesgo mayormente identificado (58,9 %). Conclusiones: Las prescripciones fueron evaluadas en su mayoría como adecuadas, lo que demuestra el enfoque preventivo y el uso racional de los medicamentos.


Introduction: The topic of blood pressure in children and adolescents has taken a marked interest in the last years, due to the increment of its prevalence in this population group Objective: To evaluate the prescription of medications in children and adolescents with hypertension assisted in Dr. Juan de la Cruz Martínez Maceira Northern Children Hospital in Santiago de Cuba. Methods: An observational, descriptive and cross-sectional investigation that squared with a medications use study, of indication-prescription type, therapeutic outlines and practical consequences, of 39 patients with diagnosis of hypertension assisted in the Cardiology Service of the hospital abovementioned, was carried out from January to December, 2018, who fulfilled the established selection approaches. Main variables (prescription and adverse reactions) and control variables (age, skin colour, sex and risk factors) were used. Results: There was a prevalence of the male sex (79.4 %), 15-18 age group (66.6% ), primary hypertension (stage 1), black skin patients and obesity as the risk factor mostly identified (58.9 %). Conclusions: The prescriptions were evaluated in their majority as appropriate, what demonstrates the preventive approach and the rational use of medications.


Asunto(s)
Prescripciones de Medicamentos , Adolescente , Hipertensión/terapia , Niño , Servicio de Cardiología en Hospital
11.
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) ; 22(8): 631-636, 2021 08 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34009836

RESUMEN

AIMS: This report describes the findings of the 2018 Italian Catheter Ablation Registry of the Italian Association of Arrhythmology and Cardiac Pacing (AIAC). METHODS: The Italian Catheter Ablation Registry systematically collects data on the ablation procedures performed in Italy. Data collection was retrospective. A standardized questionnaire was completed by participating centres. RESULTS: We collected data on 15 714 catheter ablation procedures performed in Italy during 2018 in 94 electrophysiology centres. In most centres (75/94, 80%), a single electrophysiology laboratory was available, and a hybrid electrophysiology laboratory was available in 15% (14/94) of centres. In most (93%) centres, at least two electrophysiologists were involved in the catheter ablation procedures. In only 13 out of 94 (14%) electrophysiology laboratories, an anaesthesiologist assists every electrophysiology procedure; in most cases (74/94, 79%), an on-demand anaesthesiology service was available. On-site cardiothoracic surgery was reported in 43 out of 94 (46%) centres.Nonfluoroscopic navigation systems were available in most centres (88/94, 93%). Intracardiac echocardiography was used in 59 out of 94 (63%) electrophysiology laboratories. Atrial fibrillation (31%) was the most frequently treated ablation target, followed by atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (20%) and cavo-tricuspid isthmus (15%). In 61.7% of all procedures, a 3D mapping system was used. In about one-third of procedures, a near-zero approach was performed. CONCLUSION: In most Italian electrophysiology centres, a single electrophysiology laboratory was available and at least two electrophysiologists were involved in the ablation procedures. An increasing number of procedures were performed by means of a nonfluoroscopic mapping system with a near-zero approach.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Aleteo Atrial , Electrofisiología Cardíaca , Servicio de Cardiología en Hospital/organización & administración , Ablación por Catéter , Taquicardia por Reentrada en el Nodo Atrioventricular , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilación Atrial/epidemiología , Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Aleteo Atrial/diagnóstico , Aleteo Atrial/epidemiología , Aleteo Atrial/cirugía , Electrofisiología Cardíaca/métodos , Electrofisiología Cardíaca/organización & administración , Electrofisiología Cardíaca/estadística & datos numéricos , Ablación por Catéter/métodos , Ablación por Catéter/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Sistema de Registros , Taquicardia por Reentrada en el Nodo Atrioventricular/diagnóstico , Taquicardia por Reentrada en el Nodo Atrioventricular/epidemiología , Taquicardia por Reentrada en el Nodo Atrioventricular/cirugía
12.
Chest ; 160(3): 899-908, 2021 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33773988

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Delirium is a deleterious condition affecting up to 60% of patients in the surgical ICU (SICU). Few SICU-focused delirium interventions have been implemented, including those addressing sleep-wake disruption, a modifiable delirium risk factor common in critically ill patients. RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the effect on delirium and sleep quality of a multicomponent nonpharmacologic intervention aimed at improving sleep-wake disruption in patients in the SICU setting? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Using a staggered pre-post design, we implemented a quality improvement intervention in two SICUs (general surgery or trauma and cardiovascular) in an academic medical center. After a preintervention (baseline) period, a multicomponent unit-wide nighttime (ie, efforts to minimize unnecessary sound and light, provision of earplugs and eye masks) and daytime (ie, raising blinds, promotion of physical activity) intervention bundle was implemented. A daily checklist was used to prompt staff to complete intervention bundle elements. Delirium was evaluated twice daily using the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit. Patient sleep quality ratings were evaluated daily using the Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire (RCSQ). RESULTS: Six hundred forty-six SICU admissions (332 baseline, 314 intervention) were analyzed. Median age was 61 years (interquartile range, 49-70 years); 35% of the cohort were women and 83% were White. During the intervention period, patients experienced fewer days of delirium (proportion ± SD of ICU days, 15 ± 27%) as compared with the preintervention period (20 ± 31%; P = .022), with an adjusted pre-post decrease of 4.9% (95% CI, 0.5%-9.2%; P = .03). Overall RCSQ-perceived sleep quality ratings did not change, but the RCSQ noise subscore increased (9.5% [95% CI, 1.1%-17.5%; P = .02). INTERPRETATION: Our multicomponent intervention was associated with a significant reduction in the proportion of days patients experienced delirium, reinforcing the feasibility and effectiveness of a nonpharmacologic sleep-wake bundle to reduce delirium in critically ill patients in the SICU. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT03313115; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Críticos , Enfermedad Crítica , Delirio , Disomnias , Paquetes de Atención al Paciente , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia , Servicio de Cardiología en Hospital/organización & administración , Servicio de Cardiología en Hospital/normas , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Cuidados Críticos/organización & administración , Cuidados Críticos/normas , Enfermedad Crítica/psicología , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Delirio/etiología , Delirio/prevención & control , Delirio/terapia , Disomnias/etiología , Disomnias/prevención & control , Disomnias/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/organización & administración , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/normas , Contaminación Lumínica/efectos adversos , Contaminación Lumínica/prevención & control , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ruido/efectos adversos , Ruido/prevención & control , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Paquetes de Atención al Paciente/instrumentación , Paquetes de Atención al Paciente/métodos , Equipos de Seguridad , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Calidad del Sueño , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia/etiología , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia/terapia
13.
Can J Cardiol ; 37(4): 674-678, 2021 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33485855

RESUMEN

Cardiac amyloidosis is an emerging and important cause of heart failure, arrhythmia, and other cardiovascular disease in Canada. In this context, many centres have expressed interest in the development of effective care pathways for screening, evaluating, and treating this rapidly growing patient population. In October 2019, a group of Canadian stakeholders met, including specialists in cardiac amyloidosis, experts in heart failure and chronic disease management, and academic and community-based cardiologists at various stages of cardiac amyloidosis clinic development. Objectives of the meetings included discussion of existing care pathways, consideration of barriers to program development, and achieving a consensus on essential and desirable components of a best-practice cardiac amyloidosis program. Topics discussed included optimal settings for cardiac amyloidosis clinics and integration with other specialty clinics, funding limitations that act as barriers to program development and potential solutions to these barriers, the roles of the multidisciplinary team and specialist physicians in amyloidosis care, and diagnostic pathways and strategies for the identification of patients with cardiac amyloidosis. In this report, we summarize the discussion points and key recommendations for the development of a cardiac amyloidosis clinic that emerged from this meeting, focused on program integration and care coordination, human resource elements, access to care, and quality improvement and outcome measures in cardiac amyloidosis.


Asunto(s)
Amiloidosis , Servicio de Cardiología en Hospital/organización & administración , Cardiopatías , Servicio Ambulatorio en Hospital/organización & administración , Amiloidosis/diagnóstico , Amiloidosis/terapia , Canadá , Vías Clínicas , Cardiopatías/diagnóstico , Cardiopatías/terapia , Humanos , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Mejoramiento de la Calidad
14.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 97(4): E475-E483, 2021 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32725858

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: During coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic, reducing the number of invasive procedure and choosing conservative medication strategy for patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) is unavoidable. Whether this relatively conservative strategy will impact in-hospital outcome for NSTEMI patients remains unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: The current study included all consecutive NSTEMI patients who visited the emergency department in Fuwai Hospital from February 1 to March 31, 2020 and all the NSTEMI patients in the same period of 2019 as a historical control. Very-high-risk patients were defined as clinical presentation of heart failure, cardiac shock, cardiac arrest, recurrent chest pain, and life-threatening arrhythmias. The primary outcome was in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as a composite of all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, or heart failure. A total of 115 NSTEMI patients were enrolled since the outbreak of COVID-19, and a total of 145 patients were included in the control group. There was a tendency toward higher MACE risk in 2020 compared with 2019 (18.3% vs. 11.7%, p = .14). Among very-high-risk patients, early percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) strategy in 2019 was associated with reduced MACE risk compared with delayed PCI in 2020 (60.6% [20/33] in 2020 vs. 27.9% [12/43] in 2019, p = .01). CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 pandemic results in a significant reduction in immediate/early PCI and a trend toward higher adverse event rate during hospitalization, particular in very-high-risk patients.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Servicio de Cardiología en Hospital/tendencias , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/uso terapéutico , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/tendencias , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/tendencias , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST/terapia , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/tendencias , Salud Pública/tendencias , Anciano , Beijing , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/efectos adversos , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/efectos adversos , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/mortalidad , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/etiología , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST/complicaciones , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST/mortalidad , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/mortalidad , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
15.
Rev. urug. cardiol ; 36(3): e204, 2021. ilus, tab, graf
Artículo en Español | LILACS, UY-BNMED, BNUY | ID: biblio-1366998

RESUMEN

Al comienzo de la pandemia COVID-19 se implementaron pautas clínicas restrictivas de la asistencia que incluyeron los Servicios de Electrofisiología (SEF). Objetivo: analizar la actividad asistencial y conocer la situación de los SEF en Latinoamérica a dos meses de iniciadas las restricciones. Método: estudio observacional descriptivo-analítico y transversal, utilizando una encuesta a médicos electrofisiólogos en marzo/2020. Se comparó la actividad clínica e invasiva que se realizaba antes y durante la pandemia. Resultados: se incluyeron 147 encuestas, de 74 ciudades y 18 países de Latinoamérica. Los actos clínicos semanales se redujeron de 75 (45/127) a 20 (10/40) (p<0,001), bajaron 71%. Los procedimientos invasivos mensuales se redujeron de 26 (13/39) a 4 (2/9) (p<0,001), bajaron 77%. El 49% encuestado trabajaban en ≥3 centros asistenciales y 89% compartía laboratorio con un servicio de hemodinamia. La ocupación de camas en los hospitales era baja 37%, intermedia 28% y alta 35%. El 30% refirió algún médico de su equipo fue puesto en cuarentena por infección/contacto. El 53% refirió no se hacía ninguna prueba de tamizaje a los pacientes previa a los procedimientos y 77% al personal. La mayoría percibía dificultades como importantes o muy importantes, pero 63% estaba considerando la reapertura al funcionamiento normal. Conclusiones: hubo una reducción importante de la actividad clínica e invasiva. La mayoría no tenía alta ocupación de camas. Los encuestados trabajaban en varios centros y en salas de hemodinamia. Aún no se habían implementado totalmente las medidas de prevención. Existía la percepción de que en poco tiempo se retomaría la normalidad


At the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, restrictive clinical guidelines were implemented, including Electrophysiology Services (EFS). Objectives: analyze the healthcare activity and to know the situation of the EFS in Latin America two months after the restrictions began. Method: descriptive-analytical and cross-sectional observational study, using a survey of electrophysiologists in March / 2020. The clinical and invasive activity carried out before and during the pandemic was compared. Results: 147 surveys were included, from 74 cities in 18 Latin American countries. Weekly clinical events were reduced from 75 (45/127) to 20 (10/40) (p <0.001), they fell 71%. Monthly invasive procedures were reduced from 26 (13/39) to 4 (2/9) (p <0.001), down 77%. Forty-nine percent surveyed worked in ≥3 healthcare centers and 89% shared a laboratory with a hemodynamic service. Hospital bed occupancy was low 37%, intermediate 28% and high 35%. Thirty percent referred a doctor from their team was quarantined for infection / contact. Fifty-three percent reported that no screening test was done on the patients prior to the procedures and 77% on the staff. Most perceived difficulties as important or very important, but 63% were considering reopening to normal functioning. Conclusion: There was a significant reduction in clinical and invasive activity. Most did not have high bed occupancy. Respondents worked in various centers and in hemodynamic rooms. Prevention measures had not yet been fully implemented yet. There was a perception that in a short time normality would return.


No início da pandemia de COVID-19 foram implementadas diretrizes clínicas, incluindo os Serviços de Eletrofisiologia (SEF). Objetivo: analisar a atividade assistencial e conhecer a situação do SEF na América Latina dois meses após o início das restrições. Método: estudo descritivo-analítico e observacional transversal, por meio de questionário com eletrofisiologistas em março / 2020. Foi comparada a atividade clínica e invasiva realizada antes e durante a pandemia. Resultados: foram incluídos 147 inquéritos, de 74 cidades e 18 países latino-americanos. O número de procedimentos semanais foi reduzido de 75 (45/127) para 20 (10/40) (p <0,001), com redução de 71%. Os procedimentos invasivos mensais foram reduzidos de 26 (13/39) para 4 (2/9) (p <0,001), com redução de 77%. Dos eletrofisiologistas que responderam ao questionário, 49% trabalhavam em 3 ou mais centros, e 89% compartilhavam o laboratório com serviço de hemodinâmica. A ocupação de leitos hospitalares foi baixa em 37%, intermediária em 28% e alta em 35%. Dos que responderam al questionário, 30% relataram que um médico de sua equipe foi colocado em quarentena por infecção ou contato. Foi relatado que, dentre os que responderam, 53% não realizava teste de triagem nos pacientes antes dos procedimentos, e em 77% na equipe. A maioria percebeu as dificuldades como importantes ou muito importantes, mas 63% consideravam a reabertura ao funcionamento. Conclusões: houve redução significativa da atividade clínica e invasiva. A maioria não tinha grande ocupação de leitos. Os entrevistados trabalhavam em vários centros e em salas de hemodinâmica. As medidas de prevenção ainda não haviam sido totalmente implementadas, porém havia a percepção de que em pouco tempo a normalidade voltaria


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Servicio de Cardiología en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Electrofisiología Cardíaca/estadística & datos numéricos , Pandemias , Atención al Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Estudio Observacional , COVID-19/prevención & control , América Latina
16.
Front Public Health ; 8: 583583, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33330324

RESUMEN

The SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic led to an emergency scenario within all aspects of health care, determining reduction in resources for the treatment of other diseases. A literature review was conducted to identify published evidence, from 1 March to 1 June 2020, regarding the impact of COVID-19 on the care provided to patients affected by other diseases. The research is limited to the Italian NHS. The aim is to provide a snapshot of the COVID-19 impact on the NHS and collect useful elements to improve Italian response models. Data available for oncology and cardiology are reported. National surveys, retrospective analyses, and single-hospital evidence are available. We summarized evidence, keeping in mind the entire clinical pathway, from clinical need to access to care to outcomes. Since the beginning, the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with a reduced access to inpatient (-48% for IMA) and outpatient services, with a lower volume of elective surgical procedures (in oncology, from 3.8 to 2.6 median number of procedures/week). Telehealth may plays a key role in this, particularly in oncology. While, for cardiology, evidence on health outcome is already available, in terms of increased fatality rates (for STEMI: 13.7 vs. 4.1%). To better understand the impact of COVID-19 on the health of the population, a broader perspective should be taken. Reasons for reduced access to care must be investigated. Patients fears, misleading communication campaigns, re-arranged clinical pathways could had played a role. In addition, impact on other the status of other patients should be mitigated.


Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , COVID-19/terapia , Servicio de Cardiología en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención a la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Oncología en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Telemedicina/estadística & datos numéricos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2
17.
Rev Esc Enferm USP ; 54: e03630, 2020.
Artículo en Portugués, Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33111740

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of Reiki in reducing anxiety, depression, and improving preoperative well-being in cardiac surgery. METHOD: A non-randomized, two-arm controlled clinical trial conducted in a cardiology referral hospital with patients in the preoperative period of cardiac surgery, with up to five days for surgery, between May and November 2018. The intervention group (n=31) was submitted to a Reiki protocol, and the control group (n=59) received only conventional care. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-four patients were assessed. The mean anxiety and depression did not obtain a significant difference between the groups. Spiritual well-being, in religious and existential dimensions, has improved significantly. CONCLUSION: Anxiety and depression were lower in the intervention group, with no statistically significant difference. There was a better result in the assessment of well-being with the intervention group. Religiosity may interfere in some cases with acceptance of holistic and integrative practices. Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials: RBR-4cxw37.


Asunto(s)
Ansiedad/terapia , Depresión/terapia , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Tacto Terapéutico , Brasil , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos , Servicio de Cardiología en Hospital , Humanos , Periodo Preoperatorio
18.
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) ; 21(9): 654-659, 2020 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32740498

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: By the end of February 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic infection had spread in Northern Italy, with thousands of patients infected. In Lombardy, the most affected area, the majority of public and private hospitals were dedicated to caring for COVID-19 patients and were organized following the 'Hub-and-Spoke' model for other medical specialties, like cardiac surgery and interventional procedures for congenital cardiac disease (CHD). Here, we report how the congenital cardiac care system was modified in Lombardy and the first results of this organization. METHODS: We describe a modified 'Hub-and-Spoke' model - that involves 59 birthplaces and three specialized Congenital Cardiac Centers -- and how the hub center organized his activity. We also reported the data of the consecutive cases hospitalized during this period. RESULTS: From 9 March to 15 April, we performed: a total of 21 cardiac surgeries, 4 diagnostic catheterizations, 3 CT scans, and 2 CMR. In three cases with prenatal diagnosis, the birth was scheduled. The spoke centers referred to our center six congenital cardiac cases. The postop ExtraCorporeal Membrane Oxygenation support was required in two cases; one case died. None of these patients nor their parents or accompanying person was found to be COVID-19-positive; 2 pediatric intensivists were found to be COVID-19-positive, and needed hospitalization without mechanical ventilation; 13 nurses had positive COVID swabs (4 with symptoms), and were managed and isolated at home. CONCLUSION: Our preliminary data suggest that the model adopted met the immediate needs with a good outcome without increased mortality, nor COVID-19 exposure for the patients who underwent procedures.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos , Servicio de Cardiología en Hospital , Infecciones por Coronavirus , Cardiopatías Congénitas , Control de Infecciones , Pandemias , Atención Perinatal , Neumonía Viral , Betacoronavirus/aislamiento & purificación , COVID-19 , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Cardiología en Hospital/organización & administración , Servicio de Cardiología en Hospital/tendencias , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Femenino , Cardiopatías Congénitas/epidemiología , Cardiopatías Congénitas/cirugía , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Control de Infecciones/organización & administración , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Modelos Organizacionales , Innovación Organizacional , Pandemias/prevención & control , Atención Perinatal/métodos , Atención Perinatal/organización & administración , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Cuidados Posoperatorios/métodos , Embarazo , SARS-CoV-2
19.
Rev. chil. cardiol ; 39(2): 105-113, ago. 2020. tab, graf
Artículo en Español | LILACS | ID: biblio-1138523

RESUMEN

ANTECEDENTES: Las unidades de Cardiología intervencional han evidenciado un número creciente de procedimientos, cada vez más variados y complejos, lo cual podría eventualmente generar daños a los profesionales ocupacionalmente expuestos a radiaciones ionizantes (POEs) de no contar con los adecuados elementos de radioprotección y un uso correcto de ellos. OBJETIVO: Caracterizar la disponibilidad y utilización de los elementos de radioprotección y dosimetría de unidades de cardiología intervencionista de centros Sudamericanos. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Se realizó una encuesta autoaplicada a 139 POEs, de ambos sexos de 7 países, a través de una plataforma on-line, se les consultó sobre características demográficas, dosimétricas y de radioprotección. RESULTADOS: Los elementos de radioprotección más tradicionales; delantales y cuellos plomados se utilizaron un 99,5 % y 98,4 % respectivamente, aquellos elementos más recientes como gafas, gorros y paños plomados solo alcanzaron un 36,8 %, 6,8 % y 34,2%, de utilización respectivamente, en cuanto a la utilización de los dosímetros, solo un 7,9 % lo hace apegado a las normas de la Organización Internacional de Energía Atómica (OIEA). CONCLUSIÓN: Se constató en la muestra analizada una falta de elementos de radioprotección y un uso inadecuado de ellos, urge realizar intervenciones educativas y técnicas para mejorar estos datos.


BACKGROUND: Due to the increasing number of interventional cardiology procedures currently performed, health professionals (POE) are exposed to ionizing radiation unless adequate protective elements are used. AIM: to describe the use of radioprotection elements and dosimetry in interventional cardiology laboratories in South America. METHODS: A self-administered survey was performed on 139 POE of both sexes and 7 countries using an online platform. Demographic data, dosimetry and characteristics of radioprotection analyzed. RESULTS: Commonly used radioprotective elements (lead aprons and collars) were used in 99.5% and 98% respectively. Recently introduced protection elements like lead goggles, caps and drapery were used in 36.8, 6.8 and 34.2% , respectively. Dosimetry according to the International Atomic Energy Commission (OIAE) was performed in only 7.9% of the procedures. CONCLUSION: there is a severe lack of adequate radioprotection during interventional cardiology procedures. Urgent measures, including technical implementation and educational interventions are needed to improve radioprotection in interventional cardiology.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Protección Radiológica/métodos , Radiografía Intervencional/efectos adversos , Exposición Profesional/prevención & control , Servicio de Cardiología en Hospital , Dosis de Radiación , Radiación Ionizante , Protección Radiológica/instrumentación , Protección Radiológica/estadística & datos numéricos , América del Sur , Proyectos Piloto , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Autoinforme , Equipo de Protección Personal
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA