Assessment of high-dose acetylcysteine in acute high-risk paracetamol (acetaminophen) ingestion.

BACKGROUND: Prompt acetylcysteine treatment with standard doses (300 mg/kg over 21 h in divided doses) is almost universally effective in preventing hepatotoxicity after paracetamol (acetaminophen) overdose. However, hepatotoxicity is reported despite early treatment when paracetamol concentrations exceed 300 mg/L (1,985 µmol/L) at 4 h. Prior studies evaluating high-dose acetylcysteine to treat high-risk ingestions have shown mixed results. We compared outcomes in patients with high-risk ingestions receiving standard or high-dose acetylcysteine. METHODS: Records from a single poison center were reviewed from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2022. We included cases of acute paracetamol ingestion treated with intravenous acetylcysteine with an initial paracetamol concentration above the "300 mg/L" (1,985 µmol/L) line on the Rumack-Matthew nomogram. We compared standard and high-dose acetylcysteine groups by odds ratios and multivariable logistic regression. We defined hepatotoxicity as aminotransferase activity >1,000 U/L. RESULTS: We included 190 cases. Fifty-six percent received standard-dose acetylcysteine while 44% received high-dose acetylcysteine. Treatment within 8 h yielded no difference in hepatotoxicity between groups (odds ratio 1.67, 95% CI 0.067-42.3). Among patients treated after 8 h, hepatoxicity was more common in the high-dose group (odds ratio 3.39, 95% CI 1.25-9.2) though odds of liver failure were similar (odds ratio 2.78, 95% CI 0.89-8.69). Eighty-eight percent of patients with hepatotoxicity had elevated aminotransferase activity at presentation. No patient died or received a liver transplant. DISCUSSION: Rates of hepatotoxicity were low in patients treated within 8 h regardless of acetylcysteine dose. Unexpectedly, high-dose acetylcysteine treatment was associated with an increased odds of hepatoxicity in those treated after 8 h, but most had abnormal aminotransferase activities at presentation and there was no difference in rates of liver failure. Limitations include the use of retrospective, voluntarily reported poison center data. CONCLUSIONS: Prompt treatment with acetylcysteine, regardless of dose, prevented hepatotoxicity in high-risk paracetamol ingestion.

Should high-dose N-acetylcysteine be given in cases of massive paracetamol overdoses: A narrative review.

N-acetylcysteine (NAC) is regarded as an effective treatment of paracetamol overdoses. However, in cases of "massive" paracetamol overdoses, recent studies indicate that patients may not be sufficiently treated with the standard dose of NAC (300 mg/kg over 20-21 h). The subject is further complicated because "massive overdoses" and "high-risk" are defined differently; some studies use the ingested amount (e.g., >40 g), and some studies use blood concentrations of paracetamol and transaminases. This narrative review investigates whether high-dose NAC significantly decreases the risk of hepatotoxicity in patients with massive paracetamol overdoses. Three observational studies were analysed; one study with 373 patients found no significant difference (odds ratio [OR]: 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.49-3.29). One study with 79 patients found a significant difference (OR: 0.27, 95% CI: 0.08-0.94). The third study with 89 patients found a significant difference in hepatoxicity between the groups (p = 0.043). There are no solid evidence to support that treatment with high-dose NAC significantly reduces the rate of hepatotoxicity in patients presenting with massive paracetamol overdoses. Differences in inclusion criteria in the included studies make the studies incomparable. This paper shows that standardized inclusion is needed to determine whether a high-dose NAC regimen should be included in clinical practice.

Acute quadruple extremity compartment syndrome due to angio-oedema after polypharmacy overdose including olmesartan medoxomil, telmisartan and vildagliptin.

This case report describes a rare manifestation of acute compartment syndrome (ACS) involving all four extremities, precipitated by angio-oedema in a middle-aged woman who consumed an overdose of multiple medications: nifedipine, azelnidipine, amlodipine besylate, olmesartan medoxomil, telmisartan, esaxerenone and vildagliptin. She presented with haemodynamic instability, necessitating intubation. Despite stabilising haemodynamic parameters within 24 hours, she manifested escalating extremity oedema. At 52 hours after ingestion, mottled skin was observed, along with necrotic alterations in the swollen hands and compartment pressures exceeding 30 mm Hg in all extremities. ACS was diagnosed, leading to fasciotomies. The aetiology is postulated to be drug-induced angio-oedema, possibly intensified by the concurrent overdose of olmesartan medoxomil, telmisartan and vildagliptin, each of which has a risk of angio-oedema even at standard dosages. This scenario is a very rare case caused by drug-induced angio-oedema, which underscores the importance of vigilant monitoring to detect ACS in patients with progressing limb oedema.

Assessing the impact of a new medical toxicology service on the treatment of paracetamol overdose at a large tertiary care hospital.

BACKGROUND: Paracetamol overdose is the most common cause of acute liver failure in the United States. Administration of acetylcysteine is the standard of care for this intoxication. Laboratory values and clinical criteria are used to guide treatment duration, but decision-making is nuanced and often complex and difficult. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of the introduction of a medical toxicology service on the rate of errors in the management of paracetamol overdose. METHODS: This was a single center, retrospective, cohort evaluation. Patients with suspected paracetamol overdose were divided into two groups: those attending in the 1 year period before and those in the 1 year after the introduction of the medical toxicology service. The primary outcome was the frequency of deviations from the established management of paracetamol intoxication, using international guidelines as a reference. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were eligible for the study (20 pre-toxicology-service, 34 post-toxicology-service). The frequency of incorrect therapeutic decisions was significantly lower in the post-toxicology service implementation versus the pre-implementation group (P = 0.005). DISCUSSION: Our study suggests that a medical toxicology service reduces the incidence of management errors, including the number of missed acetylcysteine doses in patients with paracetamol overdose. The limitations include the retrospective study design and that the study was conducted at a single center, which may limit generalizability. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of a medical toxicology service was associated with a decrease in the number of errors in the management of paracetamol overdose.

Feeling safer: effectiveness, feasibility, and acceptability of continuous pulse oximetry for people who smoke opioids at overdose prevention services in British Columbia, Canada.

BACKGROUND: Smoking is the most common mode of unregulated opioid consumption overall and implicated in fatal overdoses in British Columbia (BC). In part, perception of decreased risk (e.g., fewer who smoke carry naloxone kits) and limited smoking-specific harm reduction services contribute to overdose deaths. Overdose prevention services (OPS) offer supervised settings for drug use. Continuous pulse oximetry, common in acute care, allows real-time, remote oxygen monitoring. We evaluated the effectiveness of a novel continuous pulse oximetry protocol aimed at allowing physical distancing (as required by COVID-19, secluded spaces, and to avoid staff exposure to vaporized opioids), its feasibility, and acceptability at OPS for people who smoke opioids. METHODS: This was a mixed methods survey study. We developed a continuous pulse oximetry protocol in collaboration with clinical experts and people with lived/living experience of substance use. We implemented our protocol from March to August 2021 at four OPS in BC permitting smoking. We included adults (≥ 18 years) presenting to OPS to smoke opioids. Peer researchers collected demographic, health, and substance use information, and conducted structured observations. OPS clients participating in our study, OPS staff, and peer researchers completed post-monitoring surveys. We analyzed responses using a thematic inductive approach and validated themes with peer researchers. RESULTS: We included 599 smoking events. OPS clients participating in our study had a mean age of 38.5 years; 73% were male. Most (98%) reported using "down", heroin, or fentanyl; 48% concurrently used other substances (32% of whom reported stimulants); 76% reported smoking alone in the last 3 days; and 36% reported an overdose while smoking. Respondents reported that the protocol facilitated physical distancing, was easy to use, high satisfaction, improved confidence, improved sense of safety, and that they would use it again. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous pulse oximetry allowed safe physical distancing, was feasible, and acceptable in monitoring people who smoke opioids at OPS.

The presence of abdominal pain associated with acetaminophen overdose does not predict severity of liver injury.

AIM: Whilst it is known that abdominal pain is a common symptom in patients with acetaminophen overdose, its association with severity of liver injury has not been clearly defined. This study investigates the association between the symptom of abdominal pain on presentation to hospital and the degree of liver injury post-acetaminophen overdose. METHODS: Admissions with acetaminophen poisoning, requiring treatment with acetylcysteine were identified and reviewed from a search of a large Australian tertiary hospital network from February 20th, 2014, to August 30th, 2018. Parameters such as presence of abdominal pain, time post-ingestion and peak ALT were collected. Single acute ingestions, staggered and repeated supratherapeutic ingestions were analysed. RESULTS: 539 cases were identified in the study period, 79% female, with mean age 25 (17-43) years. Patients presenting to the emergency department with abdominal pain post-acetaminophen overdose had a similar risk of developing hepatotoxicity or acute liver injury compared to patients without abdominal pain regardless of time to presentation. Patients presenting <8-h post-overdose with abdominal pain were as likely to develop hepatotoxicity (1/46, 2.2%) compared to those without abdominal pain (1/54 [1.9%]; OR = 1.18 [0.07 to 19.4]). Those presenting >8-h post-overdose with abdominal pain were as likely to develop hepatotoxicity (13/92, 14.1%) compared to those without abdominal pain (4/35 [11.4%]; OR = 1.28 [0.39 to 4.21]). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of abdominal pain after acetaminophen overdose was not predictive of the development of liver injury in patients receiving acetylcysteine treatment. Further prospective studies are required to confirm this finding. The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

Assessing the frequency and types of errors involved in the use of a modified intravenous N-acetylcysteine protocol for acetaminophen overdose.

BACKGROUND: Acetaminophen overdose is a leading cause of acute liver failure in developing countries. N-acetylcysteine (NAC) is a highly effective antidote for acetaminophen hepatotoxicity, typically initiated in the emergency department. Due to a known high rate of errors with the standard three-bag IV NAC protocol, in 2019, the Ontario Poison Center changed to a modified 3% IV NAC one-bag protocol. This study was undertaken to determine the frequency and types of errors associated with the use of this protocol. METHODS: Data were gathered via chart review of Ontario Poison Centre electronic medical record cases identified as receiving IV NAC for acetaminophen overdose between August 1 and September 30, 2022. 218 total charts were identified, and 188 were deemed eligible based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. RESULTS: Errors were identified in 25% of charts, consisting of dosing errors in 11.7%, stopping errors in 9.0%, initiation errors in 3.7%, and interruptions in therapy in 3.2%. Dosing errors were the most common type of error (44.4%), with overdoses occurring three times more than underdoses. Errors were identified at 39% of geographic locations in the charts reviewed, with similar frequency in Ontario, Manitoba, and Nunavut. Clinical outcomes were similar in charts with and without errors. INTERPRETATION: The rate of errors identified with this 3% IV NAC one-bag protocol is lower than reported for the standard three-bag protocol, but remains high due to dosing errors. Previously reported issues with prolonged interruptions in therapy with the standard three-bag protocol were low with the current 3% one-bag protocol. Although severe outcomes are rare, IV NAC overdose can be fatal. Identifying local factors in emergency departments that can contribute to administration errors (i.e., dose calculation, pump programming issues) can enhance the safety of this important antidote.

RéSUMé: CONTEXTE: La surdose d'acétaminophène est l'une des principales causes d'insuffisance hépatique aiguë dans les pays en développement. La N-acétylcystéine (NAC) est un antidote très efficace contre l'hépatotoxicité de l'acétaminophène, généralement initiée au service des urgences. En raison d'un taux élevé connu d'erreurs avec le protocole NAC standard à 3 sacs IV, en 2019, le Centre antipoison de l'Ontario a adopté un protocole NAC à 1 sac IV modifié à 3 %. Cette étude a été entreprise pour déterminer la fréquence et les types d'erreurs associées à l'utilisation de ce protocole. MéTHODES: Les données ont été recueillies au moyen d'un examen des dossiers médicaux électroniques du Centre antipoison de l'Ontario qui ont reçu une dose IV de NAC pour une surdose d'acétaminophène entre le 1 août et le 30 septembre 2022. 218 cartes au total ont été identifiées, et 188 ont été jugées admissibles en fonction de critères d'inclusion et d'exclusion. RéSULTATS: Des erreurs ont été relevées dans 25 % des dossiers, soit des erreurs de dosage dans 11,7 %, des erreurs d'arrêt dans 9,0 %, des erreurs d'initiation dans 3,7 % et des interruptions du traitement dans 3,2 %. Les erreurs de dosage étaient le type d'erreur le plus courant (44,4 %), les surdoses étant trois fois plus fréquentes que les sous-doses. Des erreurs ont été relevées à 39 % des emplacements géographiques dans les cartes examinées, avec une fréquence similaire en Ontario, au Manitoba et au Nunavut. Les résultats cliniques étaient similaires dans les tableaux avec et sans erreurs. INTERPRéTATION: Le taux d'erreurs identifiées avec ce protocole à un sac NAC IV à 3 % est inférieur à celui du protocole standard à 3 sacs, mais reste élevé en raison d'erreurs de dosage. Les problèmes précédemment rapportés avec les interruptions prolongées du traitement avec le protocole standard à 3 sacs étaient faibles avec le protocole actuel à 3% à un sac. Bien que les résultats graves soient rares, une surdose de NAC IV peut être fatale. L'identification de facteurs locaux dans les services d'urgence qui peuvent contribuer aux erreurs d'administration (c.-à-d. le calcul de la dose, les problèmes de programmation de la pompe) peut améliorer l'innocuité de cet antidote important.

Association between trajectories of prescription opioid use and risk of opioid use disorder and overdose among US nonmetastatic breast cancer survivors.

PURPOSE: To examine the association between prescription opioid use trajectories and risk of opioid use disorder (OUD) or overdose among nonmetastatic breast cancer survivors by treatment type. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included female nonmetastatic breast cancer survivors with at least 1 opioid prescription fill in 2010-2019 Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results linked Medicare data. Opioid mean daily morphine milligram equivalents (MME) calculated within 1.5 years after initiating active breast cancer therapy. Group-based trajectory models identified distinct opioid use trajectory patterns. Risk of time to first OUD/overdose event within 1 year after the trajectory period was calculated for distinct trajectory groups using Cox proportional hazards models. Analyses were stratified by treatment type. RESULTS: Four opioid use trajectories were identified for each treatment group. For 38,030 survivors with systemic endocrine therapy, 3 trajectories were associated with increased OUD/overdose risk compared with early discontinuation: minimal dose (< 5 MME; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 1.73 [95% CI 1.43-2.09]), very low dose (5-25 MME; 2.67 [2.05-3.48]), and moderate dose (51-90 MME; 6.20 [4.69-8.19]). For 9477 survivors with adjuvant chemotherapy, low-dose opioid use was associated with higher OUD/overdose risk (aHR = 7.33 [95% CI 2.52-21.31]) compared with early discontinuation. For 3513 survivors with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the differences in OUD/OD risks across the 4 trajectories were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Among Medicare nonmetastatic breast cancer survivors receiving systemic endocrine therapy or adjuvant chemotherapy, compared with early discontinuation, low-dose or moderate-dose opioid use were associated with six- to sevenfold higher OUD/overdose risk. Breast cancer survivors at high-risk of OUD/overdose may benefit from targeted interventions (e.g., pain clinic referral).

A qualitative assessment of tablet injectable opioid agonist therapy (TiOAT) in rural and smaller urban British Columbia, Canada: Motivations and initial impacts.

BACKGROUND: The evolving and unpredictable unregulated drug market has driven an unprecedented overdose crisis that requires effective intervention. Growing evidence suggests that novel opioid agonist treatments, such as tablet injectable opioid agonist therapy (TiOAT), have potential to prevent overdoses and other drug-related harms. More evidence is needed to characterize their utility in achieving these outcomes. The current article is an analysis of two TiOAT programs implemented in British Columbia, Canada, to assess impact on health and well-being, including overdose risk. Moreover, we explored participants' enrollment goals and if they were achieved. METHODS: The study employed qualitative methods to evaluate the TiOAT program in two sites between October 2021 and April 2022. We developed a semi-structured interview tool to guide in depth interviews. All interviews (n = 32) took place on teleconference software or in person. Thematic analysis allowed for the emergence of themes associated with TiOAT participation. RESULTS: Participants discussed various motivations for enrolling in TiOAT, which included gaining financial stability, reducing or eliminating drug use, addressing withdrawal symptoms, wanting to work, and improving social circumstances. An assessment of initial programmatic impacts revealed that many participant-identified motivators were achieved. Participants also reported fewer or no overdoses since starting TiOAT, and many reported switching from injecting to smoking drugs. Some challenges included adequate dosing as evidenced by ongoing withdrawal and pain. Some participants requested additional opioids, such as diacetylmorphine, to aid in reducing illicit drug use. CONCLUSION: Participants described how TiOAT helped them to achieve many of their goals. Suggested programmatic improvements include enhanced patient-provider co-design with respect to dosing to address ongoing withdrawal and pain. As the unpredictability the unregulated drug market worsens, novel options, such as TiOAT, ought to be implemented broadly to reduce overdose events and improve quality of life for people who use drugs.

Bayesian dose escalation with overdose and underdose control utilizing all toxicities in Phase I/II clinical trials.

Escalation with overdose control (EWOC) is a commonly used Bayesian adaptive design, which controls overdosing risk while estimating maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in cancer Phase I clinical trials. In 2010, Chen and his colleagues proposed a novel toxicity scoring system to fully utilize patients' toxicity information by using a normalized equivalent toxicity score (NETS) in the range 0 to 1 instead of a binary indicator of dose limiting toxicity (DLT). Later in 2015, by adding underdosing control into EWOC, escalation with overdose and underdose control (EWOUC) design was proposed to guarantee patients the minimum therapeutic effect of drug in Phase I/II clinical trials. In this paper, the EWOUC-NETS design is developed by integrating the advantages of EWOUC and NETS in a Bayesian context. Moreover, both toxicity response and efficacy are treated as continuous variables to maximize trial efficiency. The dose escalation decision is based on the posterior distribution of both toxicity and efficacy outcomes, which are recursively updated with accumulated data. We compare the operation characteristics of EWOUC-NETS and existing methods through simulation studies under five scenarios. The study results show that EWOUC-NETS design treating toxicity and efficacy outcomes as continuous variables can increase accuracy in identifying the optimized utility dose (OUD) and provide better therapeutic effects.

Effectiveness of Long-Term Opioid Therapy for Chronic Pain in an Outpatient Palliative Medicine Clinic.

Background: Despite widespread use of opioid therapy in outpatient palliative medicine, there is limited evidence supporting its efficacy and safety in the long term. Objectives: We sought to improve overdose risk scores, maintain pain reduction, and preserve patient function in a cohort with severe chronic pain as we managed opioid therapy for a duration of four years in an outpatient palliative care clinic. Design: Over four years, we provided ongoing goal-concordant outpatient palliative care, including opioid therapy, using quarterly clinical encounters for a patient cohort with chronic pain. Setting/Subjects: The project took place in the outpatient palliative medicine clinic of a regional cancer center in Orlando, Florida (United States). The subjects were a cohort group who received palliative care during the time period between July 2018 and October 2022. Measurements: Key metrics included treatment-related reduction in pain intensity, performance scores, and overall overdose risk scores. Secondary metrics included cohort demographics, average daily opioid use in morphine milligram equivalents and categorization of type of pain. Results: In 97 patients, we observed a stable mean treatment-related reduction in pain intensity of 4.9 out of 10 points over four years. The cohort showed a 2-point (out of 100) improvement in performance scores and an 81-point (out of 999) reduction in mean overall overdose risk score. Conclusions: We present evidence that providing outpatient palliative care longitudinally over four years offered lasting treatment-related reductions in pain intensity, preservation of performance status, and reduction in overall overdose risk.

Pharmacokinetic Properties of an FDA-approved Intranasal Nalmefene Formulation for the Treatment of Opioid Overdose.

Nalmefene is a high-affinity, long-duration opioid antagonist that was approved in 1995 as an injection for the treatment of opiate overdose, but subsequently withdrawn (2008) for reasons other than safety or effectiveness. The dramatic rise in opioid overdose deaths over the past 7-8 years catalyzed the development of an intranasal (IN) formulation of nalmefene for the emergency treatment of opioid overdose. The studies described here compare the pharmacokinetic properties and safety profiles of an IN formulation containing nalmefene (2.7 mg in 0.1 mL) to an approved 1 mg intramuscular (IM) dose. IN nalmefene produced maximum plasma concentrations that were significantly higher than observed following the IM dose (12.2 and 1.77 ng/mL, respectively). The time to reach maximum plasma concentrations was also faster following IN administration (0.25 and 0.33 hours, respectively) with significant differences in plasma concentrations manifested as early as 2.5 minutes after administration (NCT04759768). The plasma half-life of nalmefene was similar following IM and IN administration (10.6-11.4 hours). Furthermore, dose-normalized nalmefene exposure was similar for both 1 spray in each nostril and 2 sprays in the same nostril compared to a single spray in each nostril (NCT05219669). There were no sex differences in the pharmacokinetic properties of either IN or IM nalmefene. In an era when almost 90% of opioid overdose deaths have been linked to high-potency synthetic opioids, the ability to rapidly deliver high concentrations of nalmefene could represent an important tool for reducing both morbidity and mortality.

Paracetamol (acetaminophen) poisoning: The early years.

Paracetamol (acetaminophen) was marketed in the 1950s as a nonprescription analgesic/antipyretic without any preclinical toxicity studies. It became used increasingly for self-poisoning, particularly in the UK and was belatedly found to cause acute liver damage, which could be fatal. Management of poisoned patients was difficult as maximum abnormalities of liver function were delayed for 3 days or more after an overdose. There was no treatment and the mechanism of hepatotoxicity was not known. The paracetamol half-life was prolonged with liver damage occurring when it exceeded 4 h and the Rumack-Matthew nomogram was an important advance that allowed stratification of patients into separate zones of risk. It is used to guide prognosis and treatment and its predictive value could be increased by combining it with the paracetamol half-life. The problems of a sheep farmer in Australia in the early 1970s led to the discovery of the mechanism of paracetamol hepatotoxicity, and the first effective treatment of overdosage with intravenous (IV) cysteamine. This had unpleasant side effects and administration was difficult. N-acetylcysteine soon became the treatment of choice for paracetamol overdose and given early it was very effective when administered either IV or orally. N-acetylcysteine could cause anaphylactoid reactions, particularly early during IV administration when the concentrations were highest. Simpler and shorter regimes with slower initial rates of infusion have now been introduced with a reduced incidence of these adverse effects. In addition, there has been a move to use larger doses of N-acetylcysteine given over longer periods for patients who are more severely poisoned and those with risk factors. There has been much interest recently in the search for novel biomarkers such as microRNAs, procalcitonin and cyclophilin that promise to have greater specificity and sensitivity than transaminases. Paracetamol-protein adducts predict hepatotoxicity and are specific biomarkers of toxic paracetamol metabolite exposure. Another approach would be measurement of the plasma levels of cysteine and inorganic sulfate. It is 50 years since the first effective treatment for paracetamol poisoning and, apart from liver transplantation, there is still no effective treatment for patients who present late.

An international survey of the treatment of massive paracetamol overdose in 2023.

INTRODUCTION: Changes in the commercialization of nonprescription drugs have made large quantities of paracetamol available to individuals, resulting in larger overdoses than previously observed. Although most patients with paracetamol overdose can be managed with acetylcysteine, patients with a massive overdose may become critically ill earlier and fail standard antidotal therapy. Several strategies are proposed for the management of these patients, including using increased doses of acetylcysteine, extracorporeal removal, and fomepizole. However, the benefits of these strategies remain largely theoretical, with sparse evidence for efficacy in humans. METHODS: This cross-sectional study surveys international practice patterns of medical toxicology providers regarding the management of a hypothetical patient with a massive paracetamol overdose. RESULTS: A total of 342 responses from 31 different nations were obtained during the study period. Sixty-one percent of providers would have increased their acetylcysteine dosing when treating the hypothetical massive overdose. Thirty percent of respondents recommended an indefinite infusion of acetylcysteine at 12.5 mg/kg/hour after the bolus dose, whereas 20 percent recommended following the "Hendrickson" protocol, which advocates for a stepwise increase in acetylcysteine dosing to match high paracetamol concentrations at the 300 mg/L, 400 mg/L, and 600 mg/L lines on the Rumack-Matthew nomogram. Ten percent of respondents stated they would have given "double dose acetylcysteine" but did not specify what that entailed. Forty-seven percent of respondents indicated that they would have given fomepizole, and 28 percent of respondents recommended extracorporeal removal. DISCUSSION: Our survey study assessed the approach to a hypothetical patient with a massive paracetamol overdose and demonstrated that, at minimum, most respondents would increase the dose of acetylcysteine. Additionally, almost half would also include fomepizole, and nearly one-third would include extracorporeal removal. CONCLUSIONS: There is considerable international variation for the treatment of both non-massive and massive paracetamol overdoses. Future research is needed to identify and standardize the most effective treatment for both non-massive and massive paracetamol overdoses.

Excessively High Chronic Propranolol Overdose in Infantile Hemangioma: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND Infantile hemangiomas are the most common benign tumors of childhood, occurring in approximately 5% of infants. Oral propranolol at 2 to 3 mg/kg daily is recommended for systemic treatment of high-risk infantile hemangiomas. Multiple propranolol formulations exist, and propranolol overdose can occur due to improper patient counseling. Propranolol acute toxicity in the pediatric population and its management are well described in the literature. However, data are lacking on chronic propranolol overdose and how to manage it, with the awareness that abrupt discontinuation of therapeutic doses of propranolol can lead to rebound sinus tachycardia. CASE REPORT A 7-month-old girl was prescribed a therapeutic dose of propranolol (1 mg/kg/day) to treat infantile hemangioma. However, due to an administration error, the patient received approximately 8 times the recommended dose (7.6 mg/kg/day for 2 months, then increased to 15.5 mg/kg/day for 2 weeks) and, surprisingly, remained asymptomatic. Her electrocardiogram was normal, and all routine laboratory tests were within the reference range. Propranolol was successfully tapered over 3 weeks by reducing the dose by 50% weekly until it reached the therapeutic dose. After tapering, the patient was asymptomatic, with a mild increase in hemangioma size. After 6 weeks of the therapeutic dose, the hemangioma was fading away. CONCLUSIONS This case is one of the few cases reported in the literature of high, chronic propranolol overdose in pediatric patients. The patient remained asymptomatic, and the overdose was successfully managed with gradual tapering over several weeks. This case report can serve as a guide in managing subsequent cases.

Two patients with fluoropyrimidine overdose successfully managed without uridine triacetate.

INTRODUCTION: In this case report we describe two patients with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) overdose due to an unintentional increased infusion rate in which treatment with uridine triacetate was considered. Where previous case reports focus on the use of uridine triacetate in case of toxicity, this case report shows why it should be considered to abstain from the use of uridine triacetate. CASE REPORTS: The first patient is a 71-year-old woman who received 1200 mg/m2 5-FU in 2 h instead of 23 h. The second patient is a 74-year-old woman who received 2600 mg/m2 5-FU in 13 h instead of 24 h. The DPYD genotype of both patients was tested before the start of therapy and was found to be normal. MANAGEMENT & OUTCOME: Both patients received best supportive care and were admitted to the intensive care unit for monitoring of acute manifestations of toxicity. The first patient did not develop toxicity. The second patient did develop toxicity, but recovered completely. DISCUSSION: The rationale for abstaining from the use of uridine triacetate was the inadequacy of evidence backing its clinical and cost-effectiveness and the fact that uridine triacetate is not registered for the use in the European Union. Comparison of clinical outcomes of the already published open-label cohort with clinical outcomes of a comparable, well-described, best supportive care cohort is required before the added value of uridine triacetate can be determined. In addition, there is a need for a valid predictor of toxicity after fluoropyrimidine overdose.

Sodium bicarbonate treatment for QRS widening in bupropion overdoses.

INTRODUCTION: Bupropion cardiotoxicity widens QRS complexes by inhibiting cardiac gap junctions. Sodium bicarbonate is the standard treatment for QRS widening from sodium channel blockade, but its effect on QRS widening in bupropion cardiotoxicity is not well-studied. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of bupropion overdoses from 10 hospitals between January 2010 and June 2022. Patients with documented administration of sodium bicarbonate and QRS duration > 100 milliseconds on pre-bicarbonate electrocardiogram were included. Patients with no electrocardiogram within four hours of treatment or with baseline pre-overdose wide QRS and < 10 milliseconds widening from baseline were excluded. The primary outcome was a change in QRS duration between the pre-bicarbonate electrocardiogram and the first electrocardiogram after initial bicarbonate administration. Secondary outcomes included prevalence of post-bicarbonate QRS < 100 milliseconds, change in electrocardiogram intervals after total bicarbonate administration, and change in metabolic parameters and hemodynamics. Wilcoxon signed-rank testing was performed on the primary outcome. Linear regression modeling was performed to test for an association between change in QRS and bicarbonate dosing. RESULTS: Thirteen patients were included for final analysis. The median age was 32 years, and 54% were male. Six patients developed seizures; one developed ventricular tachycardia, and four received vasopressors. The median QRS and QTc pre-bicarbonate were 116 and 495 milliseconds, respectively. The median change in QRS duration was -2.0 milliseconds, which was not statistically significant (P = 0.42). The median bicarbonate dose administered before the first post-bicarbonate electrocardiogram was 100 milliequivalents. We did not identify an association between QRS change and bicarbonate dosing (P = 0.9, R-squared = 0.001). No patient had a QRS duration < 100 milliseconds after the initial bicarbonate dose. There was minimal change in QTc, electrolytes, heart rate, or blood pressure; alkalemia post-bicarbonate was achieved in eight patients. CONCLUSION: Sodium bicarbonate did not significantly decrease QRS duration in this small retrospective cohort of bupropion overdoses.

Early treatment with N-acetylcysteine reduces hepatotoxicity in acute acetaminophen poisoning.

During the outbreak of COVID19 measures taken to contain the spread of the virus have influenced the mental well-being of adults and adolescents. Acetaminophen overdose is the major cause of drug intoxication among children and adolescents. We reported a case of a 15-year- old girl referred to our Emergency Department 3 hours after ingestion of 10 g of paracetamol for suicidal purposes. She promptly started the administration of intravenous N-acetylcysteine (NAC) and the patient was discharged after 5 days of hospitalization in good clinical condition and with neuropsychiatric follow-up. Our case shows that the timing of the intravenous NAC administration is considered the most important factor in the prevention of acetaminophen-induced hepatic failure, despite high serum levels after acetaminophen ingestion.

Efforts to Improve Naloxone Co-Prescription for Patients With Cancer Pain at Risk of Opioid Overdose.

Importance: Naloxone can be lifesaving in an opioid-related overdose (OD). However, the co-prescription of take-home naloxone (THN) is not widely adopted in routine clinical practice. We implemented a pilot program focused on increasing clinicians' awareness of THN and observed if this impacts THN prescriptions for our patients with cancer pain receiving opioids. Intervention: In January 2020, we initiated an educational program by twice-weekly video presentations and installed pamphlets in all clinic workstations highlighting the risk factors for ODs. We retrospectively reviewed electronic health records (EHR) of randomly selected patient visits, 200 each from eight weeks before intervention (BI) and eight weeks after the intervention (AI). Data on patient characteristics, risk factors for ODs, and THN prescriptions were collected. Results: In all, 380 unique patients were eligible for analysis. The median age was 60, 53% female, and 70% Caucasian. Eighty-two percent (152) BI and 73% (142) AI carried risk factors for ODs (p = 0.13). THN was prescribed to 21% (32/152) BI and 26% (37/142) AI (p = 0.53). Morphine-equivalent daily dose (MEDD) ≥100 mg (30%) and pulmonary disease (25%) were the most prevalent risk factors. The patient's likelihood of receiving a THN prescription increased by 0.9% for every 1-milligram increase in MEDD (p < 0.001, 95% confidence interval: 1.006-1.011). Conclusion: The educational intervention did not significantly increase the frequency of THN prescriptions. More direct interventions, including automatic EHR triggers, may need to be tested in future trials.