Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Compared to Petrolatum Gauze and a Bogota Bag to Manage Postoperative Midline Abdominal Wound Dehiscence: A Pilot, Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.

Treating postoperative abdominal wound dehiscence following abdominal surgery using negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has shown promising results. PURPOSE: A study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of NPWT for fascial closure/cutaneous cover compared to non-NPWT treatment using petrolatum gauze and a Bogota bag in patients with postoperative laparotomy wound dehiscence. METHODS: A single center, prospective, nonrandomized pilot study was conducted. Using convenience sampling methods, consecutive patients on 6 different surgical units who were at least 18 years of age and who developed postoperative abdominal wound dehiscence following elective and emergency laparotomy from January 2017 to December 2018 were recruited. NPWT dressing with polyvinyl white foam sponge or loosely packed, saline-soaked petrolatum gauze followed by Bogota bag application were used and compared. Baseline patient demographics and history were collected, and patients were followed for an average of 6 months after surgery. Number of days until first signs of granulation tissue appearance, time until complete granulation tissue cover/fascial surgical closure, and hospital discharge were compared. Categorical variables (gender, comorbidities, presence or absence of stoma, exposure to prior radiotherapy) were expressed as proportions and analyzed using chi-squared test or Fischer's exact test. Continuous variables such as age, body mass index, albumin, postoperative hospital stay, and number of days required for decision for fascial closure were expressed as Mean ± standard deviation and analyzed using an independent t test or Mann Whitney U test based on whether the data followed normal distribution. Postoperative day of wound dehiscence, the number of days for the appearance of granulation tissue, and the number of NPWT placements required also were assessed using Mean ± standard deviation and analyzed using an independent t test. A P value <.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Sixty (60) patients were included, but 4 in NPWT group and 10 in the non-NPWT group could not complete the study, leaving 26 patients in NPWT group and 20 patients in non-NPWT group. Demographic and surgical variables were not significantly different. Patients in both groups achieved complete wound coverage by surgical closure or healing by secondary intention. Days until first signs of granulation tissue (2.92 vs. 6.65; P <.001), number of days until fascial closure (15.50 vs. 29.50; P <.001), and length of postoperative hospital stay (24.30 vs. 37.90; P <.001) were significantly less in NPWT group. Two (2) patients (7.6%) in the NPWT developed a fistula during the 6-month follow-up period. No fistulas developed in the control group, and no intra-abdominal abscesses, ventral hernias, or wound dehiscence were reported in either group. CONCLUSION: Time until first signs of granulation tissue appearance and complete granulation tissue coverage was significantly shorter in the NPWT group, but time until definitive closure was not evaluated. Randomized, controlled clinical studies to compare definitive time to wound closure and long-term follow up to evaluate long-term complication rates, including the risk of developing fistulas, are warranted.

Implementation of the small bites closure of abdominal midline incisions in clinical practice is correlated with a reduction in surgical site infections.

BACKGROUND: Small steps wound closure of midline laparotomy has been reported to decrease the incidence of incisional hernia development in two randomized controlled trials. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of implementing the small steps wound closure technique in clinical practice with regards to the development of incisional ventral hernia (IVH) and surgical site infections (SSI) in clinical practice. METHODS: Implementation of the small steps wound closure technique using the small tissue bites technique as the standard closure technique for abdominal midline incisions in our clinical practice was done in March 2015. For this study, all patients from June 2013 until June 2016 with a midline laparotomy, either long or small in case of specimen extraction in laparoscopic surgery, in either elective or emergency setting were included. Conventional large bite wound closure was compared to small steps wound closure with regards to the development of SSI, IVH as well as burst abdomen. RESULTS: A total of 327 patients were included. The small steps suture technique was used in 136 (42%) of the patients, whereas the conventional large bites suture technique was used in 191 patients (58%). A total of 54 patients in the large bites group developed SSI (28%) compared to 23 (17%) patients in the small steps group (p = 0.02). A total number of 10 patients (7%) developed IVH in the small steps group compared to 27 patients (14%) in the large bites group (p = 0.08). CONCLUSION: Implementation of small bites wound closure of abdominal midline incisions in clinical practice was correlated with a reduction in surgical site infections.

Laparotomy closure techniques: Do surgeons follow the latest guidelines? Results of a questionnaire.

PURPOSE: Incisional hernias after laparotomy are associated with significant morbidity and increased costs. Recent research on prevention of incisional hernia formation suggests that a laparotomy closure technique using a slowly absorbable monofilament suture with small fascial steps and bites in a continuous, single layer with a suture length to wound length (SL/WL) ratio of at least 4:1 is effective in lowering morbidity. Little is known about application of this evidence in daily practice. Therefore, a survey was performed among Dutch surgeons. METHODS: All members of the Dutch Surgical Society were invited to participate in a 24-question online survey on techniques and materials used for abdominal wall closure after midline laparotomy. Subgroup analysis was performed based on surgical subspecialty, type of hospital and experience. RESULTS: Response rate was 26% (402 respondents), representing 97% of all Dutch surgical departments. More than 90% of participants closed the abdominal wall in a single mass layer, using a slowly absorbable monofilament running suture The SL/WL ratio of >4:1 is practiced by only 35% of participants and preferred suture size was variable among participants. Risk factors for incisional hernia development were generally identified correctly but more than half of the participants were unaware of the incidence and time of occurrence of incisional hernia. Subgroup analysis found that gastrointestinal and oncologic surgeons preferred smaller diameter sutures and higher suture-length to wound-length ratios. Trauma, vascular and pediatric surgeons had lower estimates of incidence of incisional hernia than other subspecialties. Surgeons employed in academic hospitals were more likely to use small fascial steps and smaller suture sizes than their colleagues in non-academic hospitals. Correct estimates of incisional hernia incidence decreased when surgeons perform less than 10 laparotomies annually. CONCLUSION: Implementation of the latest evidence regarding closure techniques of the abdominal wall is not widespread. Only 35% of surgeons close the abdominal fascia using a suture length to wound length ratio of 4:1, which is recommended based on the latest evidence. Surgical trainees, gastrointestinal and oncological surgeons are most familiar with the recommended technique and use it in their daily practice. Efforts should be directed at improving spreading of this technique.

Inguinal Reconstruction Using Pedicled Rectus Abdominis Flap: A Useful Option for the Application of Radiotherapy.

Given their high rate of complications, radical surgical procedures of anorectal and gynecological tumors require a reliable and individualized reconstruction. The latter is influenced by the frequent indication of adjuvant chemo/radiotherapy that they present. We describe the case of a patient with medical history of vulvar carcinoma that required radical surgery and bilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy. Because of the stage of the tumor, the application of postoperative radiotherapy was clinically indicated; however, after surgery, the patient developed bilateral inguinal ulcers that made postoperative radiotherapy application impossible. Using a radical surgical approach in combination with postoperative radiotherapy increases survival in patients with these types of tumors. Therefore, delaying its use because of wound complications or inadequate reconstruction cannot be justified. The pedicled abdominal rectus flap is an excellent option for this purpose in patients with moderate- to large-sized defects.

The impact of standardized protocol implementation for surgical damage control and temporary abdominal closure after emergent laparotomy.

BACKGROUND: To standardize care and promote early fascial closure among patients undergoing emergent laparotomy and temporary abdominal closure (TAC), we developed a protocol addressing patient selection, operative technique, resuscitation strategies, and critical care provisions. We hypothesized that primary fascial closure rates would increase following protocol implementation with no difference in complication rates. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of 138 adult trauma and emergency general surgery patients who underwent emergent laparotomy and TAC, comparing protocol patients (n = 60) to recent historic controls (n = 78) who would have met protocol inclusion criteria. The protocol includes low-volume 3% hypertonic saline resuscitation, judicious wound vacuum fluid replacement, and early relaparotomy with sequential fascial closure. Demographics, baseline characteristics, illness severity, resuscitation course, operative management, and outcomes were compared. The primary outcome was fascial closure. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics, including age, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, and postoperative lactate levels, were similar between groups. Within 48 hours of initial laparotomy and TAC, protocol patients received significantly lower total intravenous fluid resuscitation volumes (9.7 vs. 11.4 L, p = 0.044) and exhibited higher serum osmolarity (303 vs. 293 mOsm/kg, p = 0.001). The interval between abdominal operations was significantly shorter following protocol implementation (28.2 vs. 32.2 hours, p = 0.027). The incidence of primary fascial closure was significantly higher in the protocol group (93% vs. 81%, p = 0.045, number needed to treat = 8.3). Complication rates were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Protocol implementation was associated with lower crystalloid resuscitation volumes, a transient hyperosmolar state, shorter intervals between operations, and higher fascial closure rates with no difference in complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level IV.

The open abdomen in trauma and non-trauma patients: WSES guidelines.

Damage control resuscitation may lead to postoperative intra-abdominal hypertension or abdominal compartment syndrome. These conditions may result in a vicious, self-perpetuating cycle leading to severe physiologic derangements and multiorgan failure unless interrupted by abdominal (surgical or other) decompression. Further, in some clinical situations, the abdomen cannot be closed due to the visceral edema, the inability to control the compelling source of infection or the necessity to re-explore (as a "planned second-look" laparotomy) or complete previously initiated damage control procedures or in cases of abdominal wall disruption. The open abdomen in trauma and non-trauma patients has been proposed to be effective in preventing or treating deranged physiology in patients with severe injuries or critical illness when no other perceived options exist. Its use, however, remains controversial as it is resource consuming and represents a non-anatomic situation with the potential for severe adverse effects. Its use, therefore, should only be considered in patients who would most benefit from it. Abdominal fascia-to-fascia closure should be done as soon as the patient can physiologically tolerate it. All precautions to minimize complications should be implemented.

The role of open abdomen in non-trauma patient: WSES Consensus Paper.

The open abdomen (OA) is defined as intentional decision to leave the fascial edges of the abdomen un-approximated after laparotomy (laparostomy). The abdominal contents are potentially exposed and therefore must be protected with a temporary coverage, which is referred to as temporal abdominal closure (TAC). OA use remains widely debated with many specific details deserving detailed assessment and clarification. To date, in patients with intra-abdominal emergencies, the OA has not been formally endorsed for routine utilization; although, utilization is seemingly increasing. Therefore, the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES), Abdominal Compartment Society (WSACS) and the Donegal Research Academy united a worldwide group of experts in an international consensus conference to review and thereafter propose the basis for evidence-directed utilization of OA management in non-trauma emergency surgery and critically ill patients. In addition to utilization recommendations, questions with insufficient evidence urgently requiring future study were identified.

[Current standards of abdominal wall closure techniques : Conventional suture techniques]. / Aktuelle Studienlage zum Bauchdeckenverschluss : Klassische Nahttechniken.

BACKGROUND: The most frequent complications following midline abdominal laparotomy include incisional hernias, which develop in 10-15 % of patients and surgical site infections in 15-25 % of cases; however, the risk of these complications can be reduced by the surgical technique and the use of special suture materials. In 2010, the INLINE meta-analysis performed by the Study Centre of the German Society of Surgery (SDGC) revealed that a continuous suture technique using slowly absorbable suture material resulted in the lowest risk of developing postoperative incisional hernia after elective midline laparotomy. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to perform a systematic literature search to identify all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that have been published since 2010 concerning conventional abdominal wall closure in order to update the 2010 INLINE meta-analysis and summarize current evidence. MATERIAL AND METHODS: On 28 January 2016, a systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). All RCTs dealing with abdominal wall closure after midline laparotomy were identified and included for further analysis. RESULTS: Since 2010 a total of 9 RCTs comparing different techniques of abdominal wall closure have been published. Three monocentric RCTs comparing different suture materials, showed no significant differences to the INLINE meta-analysis regarding incisional hernia development; therefore, slowly absorbable sutures using a continuous suture technique are still recommended for abdominal wall closure in elective cases. Furthermore, six RCTs were identified which investigated antimicrobial suture materials but failed to show an overall advantage for Triclosan-coated suture material with respect to surgical site infections. CONCLUSION: Current evidence shows that slowly absorbable monofilament suture material using a continuous suture technique provides the best results with regard to incisional hernia rates after elective midline laparotomy. Triclosan-coated sutures cannot be recommended as a standard suture material as they failed to reduce surgical site infections. For emergency laparotomies no evidence exists to recommend a specific kind of suture technique or a special suture material.

[Laparotomy closure in advanced peritonitis]. / Sposoby zakrytiya laparotomnoi rany pri rasprostranennom peritonite.

AIM: to improve the results of advanced peritonitis management. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 743 patients with advanced peritonitis were studied. Patients were divided into 2 groups depending on treatment strategy. RESULTS: Programmed relaparotomy combined with removable draining musculoaponeurotic seams during laparotomy closure decreased mortality from 47.8±2.7% to 24.1±2.3% (p<0.001) and provided 4-fold reduction of postoperative suppuration incidence (p<0.001). Refusal from removable draining musculoaponeurotic seams and use of only cutaneous seams in persistent abdominal hypertension were associated with further decrease of mortality to 15.8±2.7% (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Programmed relaparotomy combined with removable draining musculoaponeurotic seams are advisable for advanced peritonitis management. Laparotomy closure with only cutaneous seams is indicated in case of persistent abdominal hypertension. Large eventration always requires abdominal wall repair. APACHE-III scale scores have significant prognostic value in patients with advanced peritonitis.

Bedside dressing changes for open abdomen in the intensive care unit is safe and time and staff efficient.

BACKGROUND: Patients with an open abdomen (OA) treated with temporary abdominal closure (TAC) need multiple surgical procedures throughout the hospital stay with repeated changes of the vacuum-assisted closure device (VAC changes). The aim of this study was to examine if using the intensive care unit (ICU) for dressing changes in OA patients was safe regarding bloodstream infections (BSI) and survival. Secondary aims were to evaluate saved time, personnel, and costs. METHODS: All patients treated with OA in the ICU from October 2006 to June 2014 were included. Data were retrospectively obtained from registered procedure codes, clinical and administrative patients' records and the OR, ICU, anesthesia and microbiology databases. Outcomes were 30-, 60- and 90-day survival, BSI, time used and saved personnel costs. RESULTS: A total of 113 patients underwent 960 surgical procedures including 443 VAC changes as a single procedure, of which 165 (37 %) were performed in the ICU. Nine patients died before the first scheduled dressing change and six patients were closed at the first scheduled surgery after established OA, leaving 98 patients for further analysis. The mean duration for the surgical team performing a VAC change in the ICU was 63.4 (60.4-66.4) minutes and in the OR 98.2 (94.6-101.8) minutes (p < 0.001). The mean duration for the anesthesia team in the OR was 115.5 minutes, while this team was not used in the ICU. Personnel costs were reduced by €682 per procedure when using the ICU. Forty-two patients had all the VAC changes done in the OR (VAC-OR), 22 in the ICU (VAC-ICU) and 34 in both OR and ICU (VAC-OR/ICU). BSI was diagnosed in eight (19 %) of the VAC-OR patients, seven (32 %) of the VAC-ICU and eight (24 %) of the VAC-OR/ICU (p = 0.509). Thirty-five patients (83 %) survived 30 days in the VAC-OR group, 17 in the VAC-ICU group (77 %) and 28 (82 %) in the VAC-OR/ICU group (p = 0.844). CONCLUSIONS: VAC change for OA in the ICU saved time for the OR team and the anesthesia team compared to using the OR, and it reduced personnel costs. Importantly, the use of ICU for OA dressing change seemed to be as safe as using the OR.

Surgical treatment of traumatic eventration with polyester button and polypropylene mesh to strengthen the suture technique in equine.

BACKGROUND: Defects in the abdominal wall of horses have high relapse rate. This is mainly in lateral eventrations and hernias caused by trauma from kicks of other horses or installation structures. The eventration region normally becomes swollen and there may be complications due to intestinal loop incarceration. The surgical treatment, consisting of reconstruction of the abdominal wall, frequently require biological or synthetic materials for the reinforcement of the suture line and tension support. Therefore, several studies have reported new materials for the repair of the abdominal wall, with the aim of improving the integration among adjacent tissues and reducing risks and complications such as rejection and infection. This report describes for the first time the use of a regular polypropylene mesh reinforced with polyester buttons for the herniorrhaphy. CASE PRESENTATION: A male, three-year-old, Appaloosa with 500 Kg presented to our hospital with a 10 days history of an increased volume on the left ventro-lateral region of the abdomen. During the physical examination, a deventration following traumatic rupture of the abdominal wall was diagnosed via ultrasonography. Then, the equine was anesthetized and moved to surgery for correction of the eventration which was performed according to conventional technique described in literature. Two days later, an eventration relapse was observed and confirmed via ultrasonography. After that, a second surgical intervention was performed using polyester buttons and polypropylene mesh. After the second surgical procedure, no complications related to eventration were observed either intra or postoperatively. After that, a recheck was performed thirty days later where satisfactory wound healing and total recovery were observed. CONCLUSION: The use of polypropylene mesh reinforced with polyester buttons is an effective technique for the repair of traumatic eventration in horses. This technique provides effective reinforcement against the abdominal tension and was a good option for reconstruction of lacerated muscles in cases of equine post-traumatic eventration, including relapsing cases.

Abdominal closure protocol in colorectal, gynecologic oncology, and urology procedures: a randomized quality improvement trial.

BACKGROUND: Prevention of surgical site infections (SSIs) can improve surgical quality through reductions in morbidity and cost. We sought to determine whether the abdominal closure protocol, in isolation, decreases SSI at an academic teaching hospital. METHODS: Adult patients undergoing laparotomy were prospectively randomized to an abdominal closure protocol, which includes unused sterile instruments and equipment at fascial closure, or usual care. A 30-day SSI rates were compared. General surgery, colorectal, urology, or gynecologic oncology patients undergoing anticipated wound classification II cases were eligible. RESULTS: Overall SSI rates were 11.6% in patients randomized to protocol closure vs 12.4% for usual care (total n = 233; P = .85). The abdominal closure protocol and usual care groups had similar rates of superficial (4.5% vs 4.1%; P = .9), deep (.9% vs 0%, P = .3), organ-space SSI rates (6.2% vs 8.3%, P = .55), and wound dehiscence (2.7% vs 5.3%; P = .24). CONCLUSIONS: An abdominal closure protocol did not decrease the rate of SSI and is likely not a key intervention for SSI reduction.

[Closing the abdominal wall - challenges and possible solutions]. / Herausforderung Bauchwandverschluss - Übersicht zur Problematik und Lösungsansätze.

The most common complications after abdominal surgery - wound infections and the development of incisional hernia - are associated with the opening and closing of the abdominal wall. Depending on the selection of patients, wound infection rates of up to 19 % and hernia rates of up to 38 % are reported. Based on a summary of the actual literature, the abdominal wall should be closed with continuous slowly absorbable sutures with a suture length to wound length ratio of over 4 using small stitches. While antiseptic suture material may help to reduce wound infections after abdominal incision, preventing the development of incisional hernia is still a unsolved problem. As there is still no standard surgical technique for abdominal wall closure, surgeons should pay greater attention to the standardisation and documentation of techniques and wound care.