[Comparison of the traditional triple and a new bismuth-containing quadruple therapy in the first-line eradication of Helicobacter pylori]. / A Helicobacter pylori-fertozés elso vonalbeli megszüntetésére alkalmazott hagyományos hármas és egy új, bizmuttartalmú négyes kezelés összehasonlítása.

Introduction and aim: As the efficacy of the first-line traditional treatment used to eradicate Helicobacter pylori (H. p.) decreased below 75% in Hungary, a new protocol had to be created. Method: Supposing the success rate of the traditional therapy (14-day double dose of proton pump inhibitor [PPI], 1000 mg amoxicillin b.i.d., 500 mg clarithromycin b.i.d. [PAC]) to be 75% and the efficacy of the new protocol (10-day 120 mg bismuth dicitrate q.i.d., double dose PPI b.i.d., 500 mg tetracycline q.i.d. and 500 mg tinidazole b.i.d. [BQT]) to be 90%, we calculated 109 patients on each arm. Patients were recruited after upper gastrointestinal endoscopy from 5 endoscopic units in Vas county. The heterogeneity of groups, success rate and side effects of both therapies were evaluated by Fisher exact test; p<0.05 was considered significant. Results: 110 patients were included in the BQT and 109 patients in the PAC group. There was no heterogeneity between the two groups in age, gender and indication of eradication. H. p. eradication was successful in 103/110 (93.6%) in the BQT and 81/109 (74.3%) in the PAC group (p<0.001). The odds ratio in the BQT group for successful eradication was 5.05 (95% confidence interval: 2.02-14.42) as compared to the PAC group (p<0.001). The side effects of the two groups were similar, in the BQT group the frequency was 34.5%. Conclusion: 10 day-long BQT containing double dose PPI with 120 mg bismuth dicitrate q.i.d., 500 mg tetracycline q.i.d. and 500 mg tinidazole b.i.d. is recommended as the first-line treatment for the eradication of H. p. because of its high efficacy and tolerable side effects. Orv Hetil. 2019; 160(34): 1340-1345.

Therapy of B-ultrasound-guided puncture for incision infection after total abdominal hysterectomy.

OBJECTIVE: This paper aims to investigate the clinical efficacy of B-ultrasound-guided puncture in the treatment of incision infection after total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) and to provide references for the clinical treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 116 patients with uterine incision infection after TAH were selected and randomly divided into the observation group and the control group, with 58 cases in each group. The patients in the control group received an intravenous drip of ceftazidime and tinidazole to prevent infection, and the patients in the observation group received B-ultrasound-guided puncture treatment on the basis of the treatment plan of the control group. The clinical therapeutic effects between the two groups were compared. RESULTS: The cure rate of excellence in the observation group was 84.48%, and the cure rate in the control group was 53.45%, while the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (p<0.05). The total effective rate in the observation group was 98.28%, and that in the control group was 87.93%, but there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. The hospital stay was (9.5±1.6) days in the observation group and (12.3±2.1) days in the control group, and the mean hospital stay in the observation group was significantly shorter than that in the control group; the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: TAH should be performed on patients when they are in the best physical condition, and strictly according to the operation steps to reduce the duration of surgery. The application of B-ultrasound-guided puncture can effectively improve the excellent recovery rate of the incision infection after TAH and shorten the hospitalization time. It is worth popularizing in clinical practice.

Comparative study of tinidazole versus metronidazole in treatment of amebic liver abscess: A randomized control trial.

BACKGROUND: Metronidazole is a drug of choice for amebic liver abscess (ALA), but has long course and significant side effects. Thus, drugs like tinidazole with a better tolerability record need evaluation. METHODS: We conducted a randomized controlled trial at the Department of Gastroenterology, SMS Hospital, Jaipur, India. One hundred and fifty admitted patients were randomized into two treatment groups, metronidazole (group M, n = 75) and tinidazole (group T, n = 75). Patients were observed for clinical response, laboratory parameters, imaging, and side effects. Early clinical response (ECR) was defined as the absence of fever and abdominal pain within 72 h of treatment. Symptomatic clinical response (SCR) was defined as the absence of fever and abdominal pain irrespective of duration of treatment required. Follow up was done at 1, 3, and 6 months. RESULTS: ECR was 62.3% in group T vs. 37.7% in group M (p = 0.02). SCR was shorter in group T than group M (3.29 ± 1.61 days vs. 5.67 ± 2.93, p ≤ 0.001). Mean residual volume at the end of 1 month was lower in group T (130.7 ± 108.1 vs. 184.7 ± 143.3 mL, p = 0.01) and no significant difference was seen at 3 and 6 months. Tinidazole was better tolerated with fewer side effects. Low socioeconomic status, baseline abscess volume > 500 mL, hypoalbuminemia, pleural effusion, and history of ethanol use were associated with a late clinical response on univariate analysis of which low socioeconomic status was the only associated factor. CONCLUSION: Tinidazole, as compared to metronidazole, has early clinical response, shorter treatment course, favorable rate of recovery, and high tolerability; thus, tinidazole can be preferred over metronidazole in ALA.

Intravenous metronidazole, liquid tinidazole, and intra-vaginal boric acid to cure trichomonas in a patient with gastric bypass surgery.

This study presents a case report of a female patient with symptomatic refractory Trichomonas vaginalis infection who was not able to clear her infection with high-dose oral metronidazole, oral tinidazole, intra-vaginal zinc sulfate, intra-vaginal metronidazole, intra-vaginal tinidazole, and intra-vaginal boric acid. She was unable to tolerate intra-vaginal paromomycin. A combination of intravenous metronidazole, oral tinidazole liquid suspension, and intra-vaginal boric acid for 14 days subsequently achieved a complete symptomatic and laboratory cure.

Simultaneous determination of triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori in human plasma by reversed phase chromatography with online wavelength switching.

The infection of gastric mucosa by Helicobacter pylori (HP) is an essential cofactor in the aetiology of gastroduodenal ulcer and gastric carcinoma. Because of the bacterial resistance, combination therapy containing omeprazole (OME), tinidazole (TNZ) and clarithromycin (CLA) is commonly used for eradication of HP. However, the simultaneous determination of the triple therapy in human plasma was not reported. A simple, reproducible, and selective HPLC method was developed for the simultaneous determination of the triple therapy mixture used for management of HP infections in human plasma. An HPLC procedure based on a liquid-liquid extraction, enrichment of the analytes and subsequent reversed-phase chromatography with UV detection was used. To enable sensitive and selective detection, the method involved the use of online wavelength switching detection, with two different detection wavelengths; 280nm for detection of OME and TNZ and 210nm for detection of CLA. Separations were performed on C18 analytical column with acetonitrile-10mM phosphate buffer of pH=3.0 at flow rate of 1.0mLmin(-1). The linear ranges in human plasma were 0.05-10µgmL(-1) with correlation coefficients >0.9990. The detection limits in human plasma were 0.02-0.07µgmL(-1). Validation parameters were assessed in compliance with US-FDA guidelines. The method proved to be valuable for the therapeutic drug monitoring after oral administration of triple therapy tablets.

Quadruple rescue therapy after first and second line failure for Helicobacter pylori treatment: comparison between two tetracycline-based regimens.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Antibiotic resistance is the main reason for failure of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) treatment. Currently, guidelines recommend a treatment guided by antimicrobial susceptibility testing after two failures. However, microbial culture is not feasible everywhere, and the limited number of effective antibiotics against the bacterium narrows the options; thus a rescue therapy combining antibiotics with a low resistance may be fitting. METHODS: Patients who have failed a first-line treatment (either prolonged triple or sequential regimens) and, successively, a levofloxacin-based triple therapy were considered for the study. Subjects underwent urea breath test (UBT), stool antigen test (ST) and endoscopy/histology to confirm the diagnosis. Cytopenia and impaired liver and kidney function were exclusion criteria. Fifty-four subjects were randomized 1:1 to two regimens: RMB Rabeprazole/Rifabutin/Minocycline/Bismuth sub-citrate or MTB Rabeprazole/Tinidazole/Minocycline/Bismuth sub-citrate both for 10 days. The results were checked 6 weeks after the end of therapy with ST/UBT plus endoscopy when indicated. RESULTS: RMB eradicated the bacterium in 21 patients. Two subjects dropped out. The eradication rate was 77.7% (CI 62.0-93.4%) at intention-to-treat and 84.0% (CI 69.6-98.4%) at per-protocol analysis. MTB was successful in 14 patients (51.9%, CI 33.1-70.7%). No patient withdrew from the treatment for adverse events. Drug-related side effects were reported only in 3 subjects, but in all cases the treatment was carried on. CONCLUSIONS: The association minocycline/rifabutin seems to have a synergic effect and a good therapeutic outcome in patients who have failed at least two previous regimens, although a trial on a large population is needed.

Effect of sequential versus standard Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy on the associated iron deficiency anemia in children.

OBJECTIVES: Helicobacter pylori infection may be associated with low iron stores and iron deficiency anemia. Eradication of infection by the standard 10-day therapy (a proton pump inhibitor [PPI], clarithromycin and amoxicillin; each given orally, twice daily) is decreasing. The sequential 10-day therapy (a PPI and amoxicillin; each given orally twice daily for 5 days; followed by a PPI, clarithromycin and tinidazole; each given orally twice daily for another 5 days) may achieve higher eradication rates. This study was designed to investigate, which eradication regimen; sequential or standard; more effectively improves the associated iron status and iron deficiency in children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Children (12-15 years) with H. pylori active infection (positive H. pylori immunoglobulin G and urea breath test [UBT]) were subjected to measurement of serum ferritin and then randomized into two groups to receive standard and sequential eradication therapy. Six weeks after completing therapy, UBT was performed to check eradication and serum ferritin was measured to estimate affection by therapy. Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS, IBM, NY, USA) was used for analysis. RESULTS: H. pylori eradication rates of sequential versus standard therapy were non-significantly different. Serum ferritin non-significantly differed between the two therapy groups and in the same group before and after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: There is no significant difference in H. pylori eradication rates between sequential and standard therapies in children. Moreover, no significant relationship was found between eradication therapy and serum ferritin. Further studies enrolling more markers of iron deficiency are required to precisely assess this relationship.

Endoscopic patterns and histopathological features after eradication therapy in Helicobacter pylori-associated nodular gastritis.

The endoscopic finding of nodular gastritis (NG) is highly associated with presence of Helicobacter pylori infection. How the endoscopic patterns and histopathology of NG change after eradication of H. pylori is unclear. Twenty-one adults (3 men and 18 women) with H. pylori-associated NG found on endoscopy were enrolled for this study. The histological findings included gastritis activity, bacterial colonization, and lymphoid follicles. Repeat endoscopy for the endoscopic as well as histopathological features of gastric biopsy specimens was performed 2 months later after eradication treatment. H. pylori was successfully eradicated in 19 patients. Endoscopic NG disappeared in 12, improved in 5, and was unchanged in 4. After treatment, there was significant improvement in scores for gastritis activity [P < 0.001, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.31-1.91], bacterial colonization (P < 0.001, 95% CI 0.71-1.14) and follicular gastritis (P = 0.047, 95% CI 0.04-0.52), primarily among patients whose endoscopic pattern resolved completely. The disappearance of nodularity on endoscopy was accompanied by a decrease in follicular gastritis score.

A randomized, controlled, open-label trial of a single day of mebendazole versus a single dose of tinidazole in the treatment of giardiasis in children.

BACKGROUND: Giardia duodenalis is the most commonly detected parasite in the intestinal tract of humans and 5-nitroimidazole compounds, quinacrine and furazolidone have been used against giardiasis. However, cases refractory to treatment with these drugs are becoming more common worldwide. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of mebendazole versus tinidazole in the treatment of giardiasis. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: 122 children (aged 5 to 15 years) of both sexes with confirmed Giardia duodenalis cysts or trophozoites in their stool samples were randomly separated into two groups of 61 individuals. Each group received either mebendazole 200 mg three times for 1 day or tinidazole 50 mg/kg in a single dose. The evaluation of the efficacy was based on parasitological response. Parents or legal guardians of each child were asked to provide three fecal samples on days 3, 5, and 7 after treatment completion. A child was considered to be cured if no Giardia trophozoites or cysts were found in any of the three post-treatment fecal specimens evaluated by direct wet mounts and/or after Ritchie concentration techniques. RESULTS: The frequency of cure was higher for tinidazole (81.97%) than for mebendazole (63.93%); the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Transient abdominal pain was more common in children treated with mebendazole (p < 0.05), whereas loss of appetite, bitter taste, headache, vomiting, and nausea were more common in the tinidazole-treated group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Three doses of mebendazole, in a single day, are inferior to a single dose tinidazole in the treatment of giardiasis.

One-week versus two-week H2-receptor antagonist in combination with amoxicillin and tinidazole for eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Eradication regimens combining two antibiotics with a proton pump inhibitor have been studied intensively in Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection; however, only a few reports have focused on the role of H2-receptor antagonists (H2-RAs) in eradication therapy. The mechanism involved in the synergy between antibiotics and H2RAs are still elusive. So we compared the efficacy of two regimens: a 1-week or 2-week course of high-dose H2-RA-based triple therapy in patients with H. pylori infection, and assessed the impact of primary resistance for metronidazole on the treatment outcome. METHODOLOGY: One hundred and twenty patients with peptic ulcers and nonulcer dyspepsia were randomly assigned to a one-week course of famotidine 40mg b.i.d., amoxicillin lg b.i.d. and tinidazole 500 mg b.i.d. (FAT1 group; n = 60) or a 2-week course of famotidine 40 mg b.i.d., amoxicillin lg b.i.d. and tinidazole 500 mg b.i.d. (FAT2 group; n = 60). Upper endoscopy was performed prior to treatment and at least 4 weeks after completion of treatment and discontinuation of the antisecretory therapy. H. pylori status was assessed by biopsy urease test, histology and culture. RESULTS: In the intention-to-treat analysis, eradication of H. pylori was achieved in 38 of 60 patients (63.3%; 95% CI: 51-76%) in the FAT1 group, compared to 48 of 60 patients (80%; 95% CI: 70-92%) in the FAT2 group (NS). In the per protocol analysis, eradication therapy was achieved in 38 of 54 patients (70.4%; 95% CI: 58-82%) in the FAT1 group and 48 of 53 patients (90.6%; 95% CI: 83-98%) in the FAT2 group (p < 0.05). The overall eradication rates for strains susceptible and resistant to metronidazole were 79.7% (95% CI: 71-89%) vs. 60% (95% CI: 44-74%) in the intention-to-treat analysis (p = 0.016) and 84% (95% CI: 76-92%) vs. 71.9% (95% CI: 56-88%) in the per protocol analysis (p = 0.12). Seven patients in the FAT1 group and six patients in the FAT2 group available for follow-up reported adverse events (11.7% and 10% respectively) without necessity of discontinuation of the study medications. Serious adverse events were not observed. CONCLUSIONS: A 2-week course of high-dose H2-RA-based triple therapy is well tolerated and sufficiently effective in eradicating H. pylori infection. Presence of metronidazole resistance has a negative impact on the treatment efficacy.

The prolongation of triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori does not allow reaching therapeutic outcome of sequential scheme: a prospective, randomised study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: One-week triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori revealed, during these last few years, a decrease in the eradication rate, so that the prolongation of its duration has been proposed. A sequential scheme recently showed very satisfactory results. We performed a prospective randomised study with the aim of either evaluating whether the triple therapy prolongation may improve its effectiveness and comparing its outcome with that of sequential regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred and forty-two H. pylori positive patients completed the study. They were randomised to receive one of the following treatments: (i) a 7-day triple therapy comprising of rabeprazole (20 mg, b.i.d.) plus clarithromycin (500 mg, b.i.d.) and amoxycillin (1 g, b.i.d.); (ii) a 10-day triple therapy comprising the same scheme; (iii) a 10-day sequential regimen comprising of rabeprazole (20 mg, b.i.d.) plus amoxycillin (1 g, b.i.d.) for 5 days followed by rabeprazole (20 mg, b.i.d.) plus clarithromycin (500 mg, b.i.d.) and tinidazole (500 mg, b.i.d.) for the next 5 days. Therapeutic results were expressed using both intention-to-treat and per protocol analyses with 95% confidence intervals. A model of multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed using therapeutic outcome as a dependent variable and including endoscopic finding, smoking habit, age and sex as candidates for the model. RESULTS: Sequential regimen showed a significant gain in the eradication rate as compared to the 7-day (P < 0.0001) and the 10-day (P < 0.01) triple therapies, respectively. Overall eradication was lower in smokers than in non-smokers, but the difference remained significant only in the 7-day triple therapy (P < 0.01). Additionally, the overall eradication was higher in peptic ulcer than dyspepsia (P < 0.01), even if this difference was significant only for both triple therapies. CONCLUSIONS: Seven-day triple therapy achieves disappointing eradication rates in dyspeptics and smokers. Prolonging triple therapy to 10 days does not significantly improve the eradication rate. The novel 10-day sequential regimen is more effective and equally tolerated than the 10-day triple therapy.

Rank order of success favors longer duration of imidazole-based therapy for Helicobacter pylori in duodenal ulcer disease: a randomized pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Studies on eradication therapy in developing countries have shown a success rate of 70-85%, which is suboptimal. Duration of therapy may be an important factor dictating eradication success in such regions. AIMS: The study was undertaken to evaluate the effect of increasing the treatment period on eradication of Helicobacter pylori in duodenal ulcer disease. METHODS: A randomized trial was carried out in which 64 consecutive H. pylori-infected patients with duodenal ulcer disease were enrolled. The patients were randomized to one of the three trial arms. Therapy consisted of lansoprazole 30 mg twice a day (b.i.d.), amoxycillin 1 g b.i.d. and tinidazole 500 mg b.i.d. The treatment period was 1 week in group I, 2 weeks in group II and 3 weeks in group III. At inclusion, patients underwent endoscopy and the presence of H. pylori was documented by a positive urease test and C14 urea breath test. Four weeks after completion of eradication therapy, the patients were subjected to repeat endoscopy to assess ulcer healing and tests for H. pylori infection. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients (55 male and nine female; mean age 35.5 years) were enrolled in each group. The H. pylori eradication rate for group I (1 week of therapy) was 47.6%, that for group II (2 weeks of therapy) was 80%, and that for group III (3 weeks of therapy) was 91.3% (p =.003). The ulcer healing rates were 71.4, 80 and 95.6% in groups I, II and III, respectively (p =.09). CONCLUSIONS: The 3-week regimen significantly improved the eradication rate as compared with the 1-week regime. Increasing the duration of therapy significantly improved the chances of eradication of H. pylori in duodenal ulcer disease.

Sequential treatment for Helicobacter pylori does not share the risk factors of triple therapy failure.

BACKGROUND: Predicting factors for the outcome of conventional Helicobacter pylori triple therapy have been identified. Of these, the presence of the CagA gene is a strong predictor of successful treatment. Our preliminary data show that this factor becomes irrelevant when sequential therapy is used. AIM: To identify predicting factors for the outcome of H. pylori eradication using two therapeutic schemes (triple and sequential) of equal duration (10 days). METHODS: Ninety-six patients with H. pylori infection were randomly assigned to receive one of the following therapeutic schemes: group A: rabeprazole (20 mg b.d.) plus amoxicillin (1 g b.d.) for 5 days, followed by rabeprazole (20 mg b.d.) plus tinidazole (500 mg b.d.) and clarithromycin (500 mg b.d.) for a further 5 days; group B: rabeprazole (20 mg b.d.) plus amoxicillin (1 g b.d.) and clarithromycin (500 mg b.d.) for 10 days. Age, sex, smoking, endoscopic and histological findings, and CagA and VacA status were considered as candidates for a model of multivariate analysis which used therapeutic outcome as the dependent variable. CagA and VacA status were assessed by polymerase chain reaction on DNA isolated from gastric antral specimens. RESULTS: The sequential scheme was significantly more effective than prolonged triple therapy (P < 0.05). Smoking (P < 0.001) and the absence of the CagA gene (P < 0.05) were significantly associated with the failure of triple therapy, but the effectiveness of sequential treatment was not predicted by these factors. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that sequential therapy is not affected by bacterial and host factors which have, until now, predicted the outcome of conventional eradication treatments.

Efficacy of low-dose clarithromycin triple therapy and tinidazole-containing triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication.

BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapies are recommended as the first-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori eradication. AIM: To evaluate the efficacies of low-dose clarithromycin triple therapy and tinidazole-containing triple therapy in a metronidazole resistance prevalent area and to compare the efficacies with standard triple therapy. METHODS: In a randomized, multicentre, prospective study, a total of 352 patients with duodenal ulcer or non-ulcer dyspepsia were randomly divided into three groups according to the administered regimen: OAC250 group (omeprazole, 20 mg, amoxicillin, 1000 mg, and clarithromycin, 250 mg), OAC500 group (omeprazole, 20 mg, amoxicillin, 1000 mg, and clarithromycin, 500 mg) and OTC group (omeprazole, 20 mg, tinidazole, 500 mg, and clarithromycin, 500 mg). The three groups received each regimen twice daily for 7 days. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was performed before and 4 weeks after treatment. H. pylori status was determined by rapid urease test and 13C urea breath test. RESULTS: The eradication rates in the OAC250, OAC500 and OTC groups were 76.2%, 65.7% and 64.8% (95% confidence interval: 67.9-84.4%, 56.7-74.8% and 55.7-73.9%), respectively, by intention-to-treat analysis (P=0.149) and 92.8%, 87.2% and 84.1% (95% confidence interval: 84.4-97.3%, 77.9-93.8% and 73.9-91.2%), respectively, by per protocol analysis (P=0.088). All regimens were well tolerated and compliance was excellent. CONCLUSIONS: Both low-dose clarithromycin triple therapy and tinidazole-containing triple therapy are effective and safe regimens for H. pylori eradication.

Efficacy of the triple therapy: proton pomp inhibitors, amoxicillin and tynidazole in Helicobacter pylori infection treatment.

The aim of the paper is to present the triple therapy results combined with the application of proton pump inhibitors with amoxicillin and tynidazole in treatment of the contagion caused by Helicobacter pylori. The therapy was carried out among 108 people after realization of endoscopic biopsy and with quick urease test. In the endoscopic investigation 72 people were found to have duodenum ulceration. Inflammation of mucous duodenum was found in 36 patients. Among 108 people under investigation 51.85% were men and 48.15% women. These people were aged between 15-81 (the average age was 44). After the use of eradication 99 out of 108 patients (91.66%) were cured. The lack of improvement was found in 9 people (8.34%). The age of these people varied from 18 to 75, which gives the average age 54.5 (this age is about 10 years and a half higher in relation to the average age of the examined group of patients). The results prove high efficiency of this schema of treatment in relation to comparatively low costs. They also indicate greater efficiency of the treatment of contagious caused by Helicobacter pylori in younger people.

Famotidine versus omeprazole, in combination with amoxycillin and tinidazole, for eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection.

BACKGROUND: Eradication regimens combining two antibiotics with a proton pump inhibitor have been studied intensively. In contrast, only a few studies have focused on the possible role of H2-receptor antagonists in eradication therapy. The mechanism involved in the synergy between antibiotics and proton pump inhibitors is still controversial. OBJECTIVES: To compare the results of two triple-therapy regimens, different only in the antisecretory drugs used, in patients with Helicobacter pylori infection, and to assess the impact of primary resistance to metronidazole on treatment outcome. METHODS: A total of 120 patients with peptic ulcer and non-ulcer dyspepsia were randomly assigned to a 2-week course of either: famotidine 40 mg twice a day, amoxycillin 1 g twice a day and tinidazole 500 mg twice a day (FAT group; n = 60); or omeprazole 20 mg twice a day, amoxycillin 1 g twice a day and tinidazole 500 mg twice a day (OAT group; n = 60). Upper endoscopy was performed prior to treatment and at least 4 weeks after completion of treatment and discontinuation of the antisecretory therapy. H. pylori status was assessed by a biopsy urease test, histology and culture. RESULTS: In the intention-to-treat analysis, eradication of H. pylori was achieved in 48 of the 60 patients (80%; 95% confidence interval: 70-90%) in the FAT group, compared to 50 of the 60 patients (83.3%; 95% confidence interval: 74-93%) in the OAT group. In the per protocol analysis, eradication therapy was achieved in 48 out of 53 patients (90.6%; 95% confidence interval: 83-98%) treated with FAT and 50 out of 57 patients (87.7%; 95% confidence interval: 79-96%) treated with OAT (not significant). The primary metronidazole resistance was present in 28.8% of strains. Overall, per protocol eradication rates in strains resistant and susceptible to metronidazole were 83.3% and 91.3% respectively (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Two-week courses of either high-dose famotidine or omeprazole, both combined with amoxycillin and tinidazole, are equally effective for eradication of H. pylori infection. In a 2-week triple therapy, metronidazole resistance has no significant impact on eradication rates.