Effect of Thalamic versus Pallidal Deep Brain Stimulation on Head Tremor in Dystonic and Essential Tremor Patients-A Retrospective Video-Blinded Study.

BACKGROUND: Head tremor is common in dystonia syndromes and difficult to treat. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a therapeutic option in medically-refractory cases. In most DBS-centers, the globus pallidus internus (GPi) is targeted in patients with predominant dystonia and the ventrointermediate nucleus of the thalamus (Vim) in predominant tremor. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of GPi- versus Vim-DBS in dystonic or essential head tremor. METHODS: All patients with dystonia or essential tremor (ET) (n = 381) who underwent DBS surgery at our institution between 1999 and 2020 were screened for head tremor in our database according to predefined selection criteria. Of the 33 patients meeting inclusion criteria tremor and dystonia severity were assessed at baseline, short- (mean 10 months) and long-term follow-up (41 months) by two blinded video-raters. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients with dystonic head tremor received either GPi- (n = 12) or Vim-stimulation (n = 10), according to the prevailing clinical phenotype. These two groups were compared with 11 patients with ET, treated with Vim-stimulation. The reduction in head tremor from baseline to short- and long-term follow-up was 60-70% and did not differ significantly between the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: GPi-DBS effectively and sustainably reduced head tremor in idiopathic dystonia. The effect was comparable to the effect of Vim-DBS on head tremor in dystonia patients with predominant limb tremor and to the effect of Vim-DBS on head tremor in ET.

Brain Shift during Staged Deep Brain Stimulation for Movement Disorders.

INTRODUCTION: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a routine neurosurgical procedure utilized to treat various movement disorders including Parkinson's disease (PD), essential tremor (ET), and dystonia. Treatment efficacy is dependent on stereotactic accuracy of lead placement into the deep brain target of interest. However, brain shift attributed to pneumocephalus can introduce unpredictable inaccuracies during DBS lead placement. This study aimed to determine whether intracranial air is associated with brain shift in patients undergoing staged DBS surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 46 patients who underwent staged DBS surgery for PD, ET, and dystonia. Due to the staged nature of DBS surgery at our institution, the first electrode placement is used as a concrete fiducial marker for movement in the target location. Postoperative computed tomography (CT) images after the first electrode implantation, as well as preoperative, and postoperative CT images after the second electrode implantation were collected. Images were analyzed in stereotactic targeting software (BrainLab); intracranial air was manually segmented, and electrode shift was measured in the x, y, and z plane, as well as a Euclidian distance on each set of merged CT scans. A Pearson correlation analysis was used to determine the relationship between intracranial air and brain shift, and student's t test was used to compare means between patients with and without radiographic evidence of intracranial air. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients had pneumocephalus after the first electrode implantation, while 35 had pneumocephalus after the second electrode implantation. Accumulation of intracranial air following the first electrode implantation (4.49 ± 6.05 cm3) was significantly correlated with brain shift along the y axis (0.04 ± 0.35 mm; r (34) = 0.36; p = 0.03), as well as the Euclidean distance of deviation (0.57 ± 0.33 mm; r (34) = 0.33; p = 0.05) indicating statistically significant shift on the ipsilateral side. However, there was no significant correlation between intracranial air and brain shift following the second electrode implantation, suggesting contralateral shift is minimal. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in brain shift between patients with and without radiographic evidence of intracranial air following both electrode implantation surgeries. CONCLUSION: Despite observing volumes as high as 22.0 cm3 in patients with radiographic evidence of pneumocephalus, there was no significant difference in brain shift when compared to patients without pneumocephalus. Furthermore, the mean magnitude of brain shift was <1.0 mm regardless of whether pneumocephalus was presenting, suggesting that intracranial air accumulation may not produce clinical significant brain shift in our patients.

Deep brain stimulation in pediatric dystonia: calls for therapeutic realism over nihilism.

PURPOSE: Pediatric dystonia (PD) has a significant negative impact on the growth and development of the child. This study was done retrospectively to analyze functional outcomes in pediatric patients with dystonia who underwent deep brain stimulation. METHODS: In this retrospective analytical study, all the patients of age less than 18 years undergoing deep brain stimulation (DBS) for dystonia between 2012 and 2020 in a single center were analyzed and their functional outcomes were measured by the Burke-Fahn-Marsden-dystonia-rating-scale (BFMDRS). RESULTS: A total of 10 pediatric patients were included with a mean age of onset, duration of disease, and age at surgery being 5.75 years, 7.36 years, and 13.11 years, respectively, with a mean follow-up of 23.22 months. The mean pre-DBS motor score was 75.44 ± 23.53 which improved significantly at 6-month and 12-month follow-up to 57.27 (p value 0.004) and 50.38 (p value < 0.001), respectively. Limbs sub-scores improved significantly at both the scheduled intervals. There was a significant improvement in disability at 1-year follow-up with significant improvement in feeding, dressing, and walking components. There was a 27.34% and 36.64% improvement in dystonia with a 17.37% and 28.86% reduction in disability at 6 months and 12 months, respectively. There was a positive correlation between the absolute reduction of the motor score and improvement in disability of the patients at 6 months (rho = 0.865, p value 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: DBS in PD has an enormous role in reducing disease burden and achieving a sustainable therapeutic goal.

Deep Brain Stimulation for GNAO1-Associated Dystonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Guanine nucleotide-binding protein alpha-activating activity polypeptide O (GNAO1) syndrome, a rare congenital monogenetic disorder, is characterized by a neurodevelopmental syndrome and the presence of dystonia. Dystonia can be very pronounced and even lead to a life-threatening status dystonicus. In a small number of pharmaco-refractory cases, deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been attempted to reduce dystonia. In this study, we summarize the current literature on outcome, safety, and outcome predictors of DBS for GNAO1-associated dystonia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on individual patient data. We included 18 studies describing 28 unique patients. RESULTS: The mean age of onset of symptoms was 2.4 years (SD 3.8); 16 of 28 patients were male, and dystonia was nearly always generalized (20/22 patients). Symptoms were present before DBS for a median duration of 19.5 months, although highly variable, occurring between 3 and 168 months. The exact phenotype, genotype, and radiologic abnormalities varied and seemed to be of little importance in terms of DBS outcome. All studies described an improvement in dystonia. Our meta-analysis focused on pallidal DBS and found an absolute and relative improvement in Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) of 32.5 points (37.9%; motor part; p = 0.001) and 5.8 points (21.5%; disability part; p = 0.043) at last follow-up compared with preoperative state; 80% of patients were considered responders (BFMDRS-M reduction by ≥25%). Although worsening over time does occur, an improvement was still observed in patients after >10 years. All reported cases of status dystonicus resolved after DBS surgery. Skin erosion and infection were observed in 18% of patients. CONCLUSION: Pallidal DBS can be efficacious and safe in GNAO1-associated dystonia.

Generalized Dystonia Due to a Pathogenic THAP1 Variant Showing Sustained Response to Globus Pallidus Deep Brain Stimulation.

A 21-year-old woman of south Asian origin presented with cervical dystonia which had progressed over the previous three years. Her symptoms started as writer's cramp since the age of seven years. She did not respond to medications and needed botulinum toxin injection for generalised dystonia. Subsequent whole genome sequencing revealed a likely pathogenic c.98G>A p.(Cys33Tyr) heterozygous variant in the THAP1 gene. She underwent bilateral posteroventral globus pallidus interna (GPi) deep brain stimulation (Medtronic Activa PC) implantation at the age of thirty-one years. She responded well to the deep brain stimulation even after more than 8 years post-surgery though she needs botulinum toxin injection for her cervical dystonia.

Globus pallidus internus versus subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation for isolated dystonia: A 3-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Bilateral deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery targeting the globus pallidus internus (GPi) or the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is widely used in medication-refractory dystonia. However, evidence regarding target selection considering various symptoms remains limited. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of these two targets in patients with isolated dystonia. METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated 71 consecutive patients (GPi-DBS group, n = 32; STN-DBS group, n = 39) with isolated dystonia. Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale scores and quality of life were evaluated preoperatively and at 1, 6, 12, and 36 months postoperatively. Cognition and mental status were assessed preoperatively and at 36 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Targeting the STN (STN-DBS) yielded effects within 1 month (65% vs. 44%; p = 0.0076) and was superior at 1 year (70% vs. 51%; p = 0.0112) and 3 years (74% vs. 59%; p = 0.0138). For individual symptoms, STN-DBS was preferable for eye involvement (81% vs. 56%; p = 0.0255), whereas targeting the GPi (GPi-DBS) was better for axis symptoms, especially for the trunk (82% vs. 94%; p = 0.015). STN-DBS was also favorable for generalized dystonia at 36-month follow-up (p = 0.04) and required less electrical energy (p < 0.0001). Disability, quality of life, and depression and anxiety measures were also improved. Neither target influenced cognition. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that the GPi and STN are safe and effective targets for isolated dystonia. The STN has the benefits of fast action and low battery consumption, and is superior for ocular dystonia and generalized dystonia, while the GPi is better for trunk involvement. These findings may offer guidance for future DBS target selection for different types of dystonia.

Exploring clinical outcomes in patients with idiopathic/inherited isolated generalized dystonia and stimulation of the subthalamic region.

BACKGROUND: Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) is an established treatment option for refractory dystonia, but the improvement among the patients is variable. OBJECTIVE: To describe the outcomes of DBS of the subthalamic region (STN) in dystonic patients and to determine whether the volume of tissue activated (VTA) inside the STN or the structural connectivity between the area stimulated and different regions of the brain are associated with dystonia improvement. METHODS: The response to DBS was measured by the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFM) before and 7 months after surgery in patients with generalized isolated dystonia of inherited/idiopathic etiology. The sum of the two overlapping STN volumes from both hemispheres was correlated with the change in BFM scores to assess whether the area stimulated inside the STN affects the clinical outcome. Structural connectivity estimates between the VTA (of each patient) and different brain regions were computed using a normative connectome taken from healthy subjects. RESULTS: Five patients were included. The baseline BFM motor and disability subscores were 78.30 ± 13.55 (62.00-98.00) and 20.60 ± 7.80 (13.00-32.00), respectively. Patients improved dystonic symptoms, though differently. No relationships were found between the VTA inside the STN and the BFM improvement after surgery (p = 0.463). However, the connectivity between the VTA and the cerebellum structurally correlated with dystonia improvement (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the volume of the stimulated STN does not explain the variance in outcomes in dystonia. Still, the connectivity pattern between the region stimulated and the cerebellum is linked to outcomes of patients.

ANTECEDENTES: A estimulação cerebral profunda (ECP) é um tratamento estabelecido para distonias refratárias. Porém, a melhora dos pacientes é variável. OBJETIVO: O objetivo do estudo foi descrever os desfechos da ECP da região do núcleo subtalâmico (NST) e determinar se o volume de tecido ativado (VTA) dentro do NST ou se a conectividade estrutural entre a área estimulada e diferentes regiões cerebrais estão associadas a melhora da distonia. MéTODOS: A resposta da ECP em pacientes com distonia generalizada isolada de etiologia hereditária/idiopática foi mensurada pela escala de Burke-Fahr-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFM) antes e 7 meses após a cirurgia. A soma dos volumes do NST nos dois hemisférios foi correlacionada com a melhora nos escores do BFM para avaliar se a área estimulada dentro do NST afeta o desfecho clínico. A conectividade estrutural estimada entre o VTA de cada paciente e as diferentes regiões cerebrais foram computadas usando um conectoma normativo retirado de indivíduos saudáveis. RESULTADOS: Cinco pacientes com idade de 40,00 ± 7,30 anos foram incluídos. O BFM motor e de incapacidade basal eram de 78,30 ± 13,55 (62,00­98,00) e 20,60 ± 7,80 (13,00­32,00), respectivamente. Os pacientes melhoraram com a cirurgia, mas com variabilidade. Não houve relação entre o VTA dentro do NST e a melhora do BFM após a cirurgia (p = 0.463). Entretanto, a conectividade estrutural entre o VTA e o cerebelo correlacionaram com a melhora da distonia (p = 0.003). CONCLUSãO: Os dados sugerem que o VTA dentro do NST não explica a variabilidade do desfecho clínico na distonia. Porém, o padrão de conectividade entre a região estimulada e o cerebelo foi relacionada com o desfecho dos pacientes.

Deep brain stimulation for hemidystonia: A meta-analysis with individual patient data.

BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is now well established for the treatment of dystonic movement disorders. There is limited data, however, on the efficacy of DBS in hemidystonia. This meta-analysis aims to summarize the published reports on DBS for hemidystonia of different etiologies, to compare different stimulation targets, and to evaluate clinical outcome. METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed on PubMed, Embase and Web of Science to identify appropriate reports. The primary outcome variables were the improvement in the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale movement (BFMDRS-M) and disability (BFMDRS-D) scores for dystonia. RESULTS: Twenty-two reports (39 patients; 22 with pallidal stimulation, 4 with subthalamic stimulation, 3 with thalamic stimulation, and 10 with combined target stimulation) were included. Mean age at surgery was 26.8 years. Mean follow-up time was 31.72 months. An overall mean improvement of 40% in the BFMDRS-M score was achieved (range 0%-94%), which was paralleled by a mean improvement of 41% in the BFMDRS-D score. When considering a 20% cut-off for improvement, 23/39 patients (59%) would qualify as responders. Hemidystonia due to anoxia did not significantly improve with DBS. Several limitations of the results must be considered, most importantly the low level of evidence and the small number of reported cases. CONCLUSION: Based on the results of the current analysis, DBS can be considered as a treatment option for hemidystonia. The posteroventral lateral GPi is the target used most often. More research is needed to understand the variability in outcome and to identify prognostic factors.

Long-Term Outcome of Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation for Generalized Isolated Dystonia.

OBJECTIVES: Few studies have focused on subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation for refractory isolated dystonia, and the long-term outcomes are unclear. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of subthalamic stimulation for generalized isolated dystonia for more than five years and explored the factors predicting clinical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 16 patients with generalized isolated dystonia underwent a two-phase procedure for stimulation system implantation. After implanting the leads, we performed a test stimulation and observed the stimulation response. The severity of dystonia was assessed using a blinded rating of the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale based on videos recorded at scheduled times. RESULTS: The mean follow-up time was 7.4 ± 2.2 years (5-12.5 years). The severity of dystonia improved significantly one year after surgery. The movement score decreased from 49.3 (40.9) points at baseline to 26.5 (43.5) points (-44.6%) at six months, 12.0 (22.5) points (-66.8%) at one year, 11.25 (17.6) points (-72.7%) at three years, and 12.5 (21.0) points (-72.6%) at the last follow-up. The improvement in motor symptoms resulted in a corresponding improvement in activities of daily living. Greater long-term outcomes were correlated with early stimulation responses, lower baseline movement scores, and female sex. When analyzed comprehensively, only the baseline movement score had meaningful predictive value for the outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that subthalamic stimulation is effective and durable in treating generalized isolated dystonia. The subthalamic nucleus may be an alternative target for the treatment of refractory dystonia. Patients with less severe motor symptoms may benefit more from this treatment.

Probabilistic mapping of deep brain stimulation in childhood dystonia.

OBJECTIVES: In adults with dystonia Probabilistic Stimulation Mapping (PSM) has identified putative "sweet spots" for stimulation. We aimed to apply PSM to a cohort of Children and Young People (CYP) following DBS surgery. METHODS: Pre-operative MRI and post-operative CT images were co-registered for 52 CYP undergoing bilateral pallidal DBS (n = 31 genetic/idiopathic dystonia, and n = 21 Cerebral Palsy (CP)). DBS electrodes (n = 104) were automatically detected, and Volumes of Tissue Activation (VTA) derived from individual patient stimulation settings. VTAs were normalised to the MNI105 space, weighted by percentage improvement in Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating scale (BFMDRS) at one-year post surgery and mean improvement was calculated for each voxel. RESULTS: For the genetic/idiopathic dystonia group, BFMDRS improvement was associated with stimulation across a broad volume of the GPi. A spatial clustering of the upper 25th percentile of voxels corresponded with a more delineated volume within the posterior ventrolateral GPi. The MNI coordinates of the centroid of this volume (X = -23.0, Y = -10.5 and Z = -3.5) were posterior and superior to the typical target for electrode placement. Volume of VTA overlap with a previously published "sweet spots" correlated with improvement following surgery. In contrast, there was minimal BFMDRS improvement for the CP group, no spatial clustering of efficacious clusters and a correlation between established "sweet spots" could not be established. CONCLUSIONS: PSM in CYP with genetic/idiopathic dystonia suggests the presence of a "sweet spot" for electrode placement within the GPi, consistent with previous studies. Further work is required to identify and validate putative "sweet spots" across different cohorts of patients.

A case of novel DYT6 dystonia variant with serious complications after deep brain stimulation therapy: a case report.

BACKGROUND: DYT6 dystonia belongs to a group of isolated, genetically determined, generalized dystonia associated with mutations in the THAP1 gene. CASE PRESENTATION: We present the case of a young patient with DYT6 dystonia associated with a newly discovered c14G>A (p.Cys5Tyr) mutation in the THAP1 gene. We describe the clinical phenotype of this new mutation, effect of pallidal deep brain stimulation (DBS), which was accompanied by two rare postimplantation complications: an early intracerebral hemorrhage and delayed epileptic seizures. Among the published case reports of patients with DYT6 dystonia, the mentioned complications have not been described so far. CONCLUSIONS: DBS in the case of DYT6 dystonia is a challenge to thoroughly consider possible therapeutic benefits and potential risks associated with surgery. Genetic heterogeneity of the disease may also play an important role in predicting the development of the clinical phenotype as well as the effect of treatment including DBS. Therefore, it is beneficial to analyze the genetic and clinical relationships of DYT6 dystonia.

Surgical Outcomes in Rare Movement Disorders: A Report of Seventeen Patients from India and Review of Literature.

Background: Rare movement disorders (RMDs) throw remarkable challenges to their appropriate management particularly when they are medically refractory. We studied the outcome of functional neurosurgery among patients with RMDs. Methods: Retrospective chart-review from 2006 to 2021 of patients with RMDs who underwent either Deep brain Stimulation (DBS) or lesional surgeries in the department of Neurology and Neurosurgery at a tertiary care centre. Results: Seventeen patients were included. Generalized dystonia (11 patients, 64.7%) and tremor (5 patients, 29.4%) were the most common indication for surgery whereas, Wilson's disease (8 patients, 47.1%) and Neurodegeneration with brain iron accumulation (5 patients, 29.4%) were the most common aetiology. Sixteen patients (94.1%) had objective clinical improvement. Significant improvement was noted in the dystonia motor scores both at 6-months and 12-months follow-up (n = 11, p-value of <0.01 and 0.01 respectively). Comparison between DBS and lesional surgery showed no significant difference in the outcomes (p = 0.95 at 6-months and p = 0.53 at 12-months), with slight worsening of scores in the DBS arm at 12-months. Among five patients of refractory tremor with Wilson's disease, there was remarkable improvement in the tremor scores by 85.0 ± 7.8% at the last follow-up. Speech impairment was the main complication observed with most of the other adverse events either transient or reversible. Discussion: Surgical options should be contemplated among patients with disabling medically refractory RMDs irrespective of the aetiology. Key to success lies in appropriate patient selection. In situations when DBS is not feasible, lesional surgeries can offer an excellent alternative with comparable efficacy and safety.

DBS emergency surgery for treatment of dystonic storm associated with rhabdomyolysis and acute colitis in DYT-GNAO1.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with variants in the GNAO1 gene may present with life-threatening dystonic storm. There is little experience using pallidal deep brain stimulation (DBS) as an emergency treatment in such cases. CASE DESCRIPTION: We report on a 16-year-old girl with a variant in the GNAO1 gene (c.626G > T; p.(Arg209Leu)) who was admitted to the intensive care unit with medically refractory dystonic storm with secondary complications inducing rhabdomyolysis and acute colitis. Emergency pallidal DBS resulted in rapid improvement of dystonic storm and the subsidence of rhabdomyolysis and colitis. There were no further episodes of dystonic storm during follow-up of 2 years. CONCLUSION: Pallidal DBS is a useful treatment option for GNAO1-related dystonic storm with secondary complications which can be performed as an emergency surgery.

Long-Term Outcomes of Deep Brain Stimulation for Pediatric Dystonia.

BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been utilized for over two decades to treat medication-refractory dystonia in children. Short-term benefit has been demonstrated for inherited, isolated, and idiopathic cases, with less efficacy in heredodegenerative and acquired dystonia. The ongoing publication of long-term outcomes warrants a critical assessment of available information as pediatric patients are expected to live most of their lives with these implants. SUMMARY: We performed a review of the literature for data describing motor and neuropsychiatric outcomes, in addition to complications, 5 or more years after DBS placement in patients undergoing DBS surgery for dystonia at an age younger than 21. We identified 20 articles including individual data on long-term motor outcomes after DBS for a total of 78 patients. In addition, we found five articles reporting long-term outcomes after DBS in 9 patients with status dystonicus. Most patients were implanted within the globus pallidus internus, with only a few cases targeting the subthalamic nucleus and ventrolateral posterior nucleus of the thalamus. The average follow-up was 8.5 years, with a range of up to 22 years. Long-term outcomes showed a sustained motor benefit, with median Burke-Fahn-Marsden dystonia rating score improvement ranging from 2.5% to 93.2% in different dystonia subtypes. Patients with inherited, isolated, and idiopathic dystonias had greater improvement than those with heredodegenerative and acquired dystonias. Sustained improvements in quality of life were also reported, without the development of significant cognitive or psychiatric comorbidities. Late adverse events tended to be hardware-related, with minimal stimulation-induced effects. KEY MESSAGES: While data regarding long-term outcomes is somewhat limited, particularly with regards to neuropsychiatric outcomes and adverse events, improvement in motor outcomes appears to be preserved more than 5 years after DBS placement.

A randomised double-blind controlled study of Deep Brain Stimulation for dystonia in STN or GPi - A long term follow-up after up to 15 years.

AIM: This is a long-term open follow-up of a prospective double-blind crossover study, where electrodes were bilaterally implanted in both the Subthalamic nucleus (STN) and internal pallidum (GPi) in patients with isolated dystonia. METHODS: Patients with isolated dystonia were included to undergo surgery with Deep Brain stimulation (DBS) and after randomization, in a double-blind cross-over study, receiving bilateral stimulation of either STN or GPi for 6 months in each target. Preoperative and postoperative assessments with the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) and the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) were performed. In this long-term follow-up (LFU), these ratings were repeated, and patients were evaluated with cognitive tests. RESULTS: 21 patients were included in the protocol, 9 patients with generalized dystonia, 12 with a diagnosis of cervical dystonia. The mean duration of disease was 19.3 years, age at time of surgery 50.1 years. Fourteen patients participated in the LFU. At a mean follow-up of 10.2 years (range 4.8-15.4), BFMDRS movement score was improved with a mean of 36% (p < 0.05) compared with baseline. At LFU both a statistically significant improvement of stimulation in STN on BFMDRS movement score (p = 0.029) and Gpi (p = 0.008) was demonstrated, no significant difference was found between the two targets (p = 0.076). SF-36 improved for both targets. CONCLUSION: In this study we performed a long-term follow-up in 14 patients with cervical or generalized dystonia, who received stimulation in GPi, STN or both. The mean follow-up time was more than 10 years. Our data support a long-term effect of both STN-DBS and GPi-DBS in dystonia with equal effect and safety for up to 15 years. STN has been proven a viable safe and effective target and may be used as an alternative to GPi in both adult-onset cervical dystonia and generalized dystonia.

Dual Pallidal and Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation for Complex Ipsilateral Dystonia.

PURPOSE: Globus pallidus pars interna (GPi) has become an established target for deep brain stimulation (DBS) in dystonia. Previous studies suggest that targeting the ventralis oralis (Vo) complex nucleus improves dystonic tremor or even focal dystonia. Research has also demonstrated that multi-target DBS shows some benefits over single target DBS. In this study, we reviewed patients who had undergone unilateral DBS targeting the GPi and Vo. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five patients diagnosed with medically refractory upper extremity dystonia (focal or segmental) underwent DBS. Two DBS electrodes each were inserted unilaterally targeting the ipsilateral GPi and Vo. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) and Disability Rating Scale. RESULTS: BFMDRS scores decreased by 55% at 1-month, 56% at 3-month, 59% at 6-month, and 64% at 12-month follow up. Disability Rating Scale scores decreased 41% at 1-month, 47% at 3-month, 50% at 6-month, and 60% at 12-month follow up. At 1 month after surgery, stimulating both targets improved clinical scores better than targeting GPi or Vo alone. CONCLUSION: Unilateral thalamic and pallidal dual electrode DBS may be as effective or even superior to DBS of a single target for dystonia. Although the number of patients was small, our results reflected favorable clinical outcomes.

Bilateral Pallidal Stimulation in a Family With Myoclonus Dystonia Syndrome Due to a Mutation in the Sarcoglycan Gene.

OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to present a family with myoclonus dystonia (M-D) syndrome due to a mutation in the epsilon sarcoglycan gene (SGCE). Three members of the family suffered from treatment-refractory severe myoclonic jerks of the neck, trunk, and upper extremities. The mild dystonic symptoms recognized as cervical dystonia or truncal dystonia affected all individuals. The efficacy of pharmacotherapy, including anticholinergic, dopaminergic, and serotoninergic drugs, has failed. One individual developed an alcohol dependency and suffered from alcoholic epilepsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The patients were referred for stereotactic surgery. All individuals underwent bilateral implantation of deep brain stimulation (DBS) leads into the posteroventrolateral segment of the globus pallidus internus (GPi). Surgeries were uneventful. The formal preoperative objective assessment included the Unified Myoclonus Rating Scale (UMRS) and the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS). The postoperative UMRS and BFMDRS assessments were done only under continuous stimulation at 3, 6, and 12 months after the surgery and at the last available follow-up ranging from 6 to 15 months (mean, 10 months follow-up). RESULTS: At the last follow-up visit, the rest and action parts of UMRS were improved by 93.3% and 88.2%, respectively, when compared to the baseline scores. The motor and disability scales of BFMDRS were improved by 77% and 43% at the last follow-up visit compared to the baseline BFMDRS scores. There were no hardware or stimulation-induced complications over the follow-up period. Positive social adjustment allowed two patients to regain jobs and one patient continued his education and hobbies. CONCLUSION: Our experience gathered in three individuals in the family with a mutation in SGCE indicates that bilateral GPi DBS can be an effective and safe treatment for disabling pharmacological resistant, intractable M-D syndrome.

[Dystonia].

Dystonia is a movement disorder characterized by sustained or intermittent muscle contractions causing abnormal, often repetitive, movements or postures. Currently, dystonia is defined as a network disorder involving the basal ganglia, cerebellum, thalamus, and sensorimotor cortex. Considering that it is refractory to medical therapy, functional neurosurgery is indispensable in the treatment strategy for dystonia. Functional neurosurgery may improve dystonic symptoms by suppressing abnormal neuronal activity in the motor loop network. Deep brain stimulation(DBS)of the globus pallidus internus(GPi)is a useful surgical treatment for genetically defined and primary dystonia involving the axial musculature. Thalamic ventral oral(Vo)nucleus surgery is recommended for cases of peripheral dystonia, such as writer's cramp and other occupational types of dystonia. However, pallidal DBS is less effective in cases of secondary dystonia, with the exception of tardive dystonia. Recent studies have reevaluated that ablation surgery is the last-resort treatment when DBS must be discontinued for certain conditions. Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound(MRgFUS), a novel, incision-free, ablation technique, is currently used for the treatment of focal hand dystonia.