Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 30
Filtrar
1.
ANZ J Surg ; 93(1-2): 302-309, 2023 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36515211

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the effects of music and comedy movie interventions on postoperative pain and kinesiophobia in patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty. METHODS: This randomized-controlled study was carried out with the participation of patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty. The patients were divided into three groups. To reduce surgical pain and kinesiophobia, the patients in group 1 watched a comedy movie, those in group 2 listened to music, and those in group 3 did not participate in any intervention other than the routine practices of the clinic. RESULTS: The personal and medical characteristics of the patients in all groups were similar. The patients in all three groups were kinesiophobic, and their surgical pain levels were moderate despite pharmaceutical interventions. Groups 1 and 2 had a statistically significant decrease in kinesiophobia and pain scores after the interventions. The effects of having patients watch a comedy movie and having them listen to meditation music were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study showed that listening to meditation music or watching comedy movie scenes had significant positive effects in alleviating postoperative pain and kinesiophobia after TKA. Based on the results of this study, it is recommended that patients watch comedy movies and listen to meditation music to alleviate their postoperative pain and kinesiophobia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT, NCT05471778. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov.


Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , Meditación , Música , Trastornos Fóbicos , Humanos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/efectos adversos , Películas Cinematográficas , Trastornos Fóbicos/prevención & control , Trastornos Fóbicos/etiología , Kinesiofobia , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología
2.
Am J Clin Dermatol ; 22(6): 837-851, 2021 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34287768

RESUMEN

Topical corticosteroid phobia may lead to poor adherence, resulting in persistent disease and escalation to systemic agents. The aim of this paper was to review current literature to assess topical steroid phobia prevalence, populations most at risk, reasons behind steroid phobia, and interventions to reduce it. A systematic search of PubMed, Ovid (Journals@Ovid, MEDLINE), ScienceDirect, and Web of Science was performed. Studies ranged from May 2000 to February 2021. In total, 37 articles met the inclusion criteria. There was inter-study variation in the way steroid phobia is defined, from concern to irrational fear. The worldwide prevalence of topical steroid phobia ranges from 31 to 95.7% and does not differ with patient race/ethnicity or dermatological condition. Female patients and caregivers, and those who have experienced side effects of topical corticosteroids are most likely to express steroid phobia. Reasons for steroid phobia include lack of education, fear of side effects, polypharmacy, misinformation, negative experience with topical steroids, and frequently changing of clinics. Successful interventions to address steroid phobia include patient education in the form of educational videos followed by individualized oral education based on concerns, and demonstrations of application of topical steroids. Multiple interventions address topical corticosteroid phobia and improve adherence of topical corticosteroids in the management of dermatological conditions. Providers should screen patients for steroid phobia, especially in populations particularly at risk. Interventions using patient education should be individualized based on concerns expressed during screening. Further research should investigate if reducing steroid phobia can in fact improve long-term adherence.


Asunto(s)
Fármacos Dermatológicos/efectos adversos , Glucocorticoides/efectos adversos , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/métodos , Trastornos Fóbicos/epidemiología , Enfermedades de la Piel/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Cutánea , Fármacos Dermatológicos/administración & dosificación , Glucocorticoides/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/psicología , Trastornos Fóbicos/diagnóstico , Trastornos Fóbicos/etiología , Trastornos Fóbicos/prevención & control , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Enfermedades de la Piel/inmunología
3.
Can Assoc Radiol J ; 71(3): 396-402, 2020 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32157904

RESUMEN

The use of diagnostic imaging studies in the emergency setting has increased dramatically over the past couple of decades. The emergency imaging of pregnant and lactating patients poses unique challenges and calls upon the crucial role of radiologists as consultants to the referring physician to guide appropriate use of imaging tests, minimize risk, ensure timely management, and occasionally alleviate unwarranted trepidation. A clear understanding of the risks and benefits involved with various imaging tests in this patient population is vital to achieve this. This review discusses the different safety and appropriateness issues that could arise with the use of ionizing radiation, iodinated-, and gadolinium-based contrast media and radiopharmaceuticals in pregnant and lactating patients. Special considerations such as trauma imaging, safety concerns with magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound, management of claustrophobia, contrast extravasation, and allergic reactions are also reviewed. The consent process for these examinations has also been described.


Asunto(s)
Urgencias Médicas , Feto/efectos de la radiación , Lactancia/efectos de los fármacos , Complicaciones del Embarazo/diagnóstico por imagen , Exposición a la Radiación/prevención & control , Protección Radiológica/métodos , Heridas y Lesiones/diagnóstico por imagen , Medios de Contraste/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Trastornos Fóbicos/prevención & control , Embarazo , Radiofármacos/efectos adversos , Administración de la Seguridad
4.
J Clin Oncol ; 37(31): 2899-2915, 2019 11 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31532725

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is a significantly distressing problem that affects a substantial number of patients with and survivors of cancer; however, the overall efficacy of available psychological interventions on FCR remains unknown. We therefore evaluated this in the present systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: We searched key electronic databases to identify trials that evaluated the effect of psychological interventions on FCR among patients with and survivors of cancer. Controlled trials were subjected to meta-analysis, and the moderating influence of study characteristics on the effect were examined. Overall quality of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE system. Open trials were narratively reviewed to explore ongoing developments in the field (PROSPERO registration no.: CRD42017076514). RESULTS: A total of 23 controlled trials (21 randomized controlled trials) and nine open trials were included. Small effects (Hedges's g) were found both at postintervention (g = 0.33; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.46; P < .001) and at follow-up (g = 0.28; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.40; P < .001). Effects at postintervention of contemporary cognitive behavioral therapies (CBTs; g = 0.42) were larger than those of traditional CBTs (g = 0.24; ß = .22; 95% CI, .04 to .41; P = .018). At follow-up, larger effects were associated with shorter time to follow-up (ß = -.01; 95% CI, -.01 to -.00; P = .027) and group-based formats (ß = .18; 95% CI, .01 to .36; P = .041). A GRADE evaluation indicated evidence of moderate strength for effects of psychological intervention for FCR. CONCLUSION: Psychological interventions for FCR revealed a small but robust effect at postintervention, which was largely maintained at follow-up. Larger postintervention effects were found for contemporary CBTs that were focused on processes of cognition-for example, worry, rumination, and attentional bias-rather than the content, and aimed to change the way in which the individual relates to his or her inner experiences. Future trials could investigate how to further optimize and tailor interventions to individual patients' FCR presentation.


Asunto(s)
Supervivientes de Cáncer/psicología , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual , Miedo , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/psicología , Neoplasias/terapia , Trastornos Fóbicos/prevención & control , Adaptación Psicológica , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/psicología , Trastornos Fóbicos/diagnóstico , Trastornos Fóbicos/psicología , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Obes Surg ; 29(7): 2078-2086, 2019 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30838534

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a rising social and economic burden. Patients with obesity often suffer from stigmatization and discrimination. Underrecognition of obesity as a disease could be a contributing factor. The present study aimed to compare attitudes towards obesity with other chronic diseases and to evaluate the recognition of need of professional treatment. METHODS: Nine hundred and forty-nine participants (subgroups: general population, patients with obesity, nurses in training, nurses, medical students, physicians) were randomized to video teaching on obesity and control. Questionnaires on the burden and influence of obesity on daily life compared to other chronic diseases and the fat phobia scale (FPS) were answered. RESULTS: Burden of obesity was rated low (4.2 ± 1.3; rank 9 of 11) compared to other diseases. Bowel cancer (5.5 ± 0.9) had the highest and caries the lowest (2.7 ± 1.4) estimated impact. Females (p = 0.011) and older people (p < 0.001) rated burden of obesity high whereas general population (p < 0.001) and control (p < 0.001) rated it low. Females (p = 0.001) and people with higher BMI (p = 0.004) rated the influence of obesity on daily life high; the general population (p < 0.001; reference physicians) and the control group (p < 0.001) rated it low. FPS was lowest in patients with obesity (3.2 ± 0.7) and highest in the general population (3.6 ± 0.4) and medical students (3.6 ± 0.5; p < 0.001; compared to physicians). CONCLUSIONS: Obesity is underestimated as a disease compared to other chronic diseases and attitudes towards obesity are rather negative in comparison. Video teaching showed positive effects so a focus in medical education and public campaigns should aim to improve prevention and treatment of obesity.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Recursos Audiovisuales , Educación Médica/métodos , Educación en Enfermería/métodos , Obesidad/psicología , Grabación en Video , Prejuicio de Peso/prevención & control , Adulto , Enfermedad Crónica/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad Mórbida/psicología , Trastornos Fóbicos/epidemiología , Trastornos Fóbicos/prevención & control , Médicos/psicología , Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Relaciones Profesional-Paciente , Estereotipo , Estudiantes de Medicina/psicología , Estudiantes de Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Prejuicio de Peso/psicología , Prejuicio de Peso/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
6.
Psychooncology ; 28(3): 533-539, 2019 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30597658

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: ConquerFear is a metacognitive intervention for fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) with proven efficacy immmediately and 6 months post-treatment. This qualitative study documented barriers and facilitators to the sustainability of ConquerFear from the perspective of study therapists. METHODS: Fourteen therapists who had delivered ConquerFear in a randomised controlled trial completed a semi-structured phone interview, reaching theoretical saturation. Themes from thematic analysis were mapped to the Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARiHS) implementation framework. RESULTS: Participants were 13 males and one female with, on average, 14 years psycho-oncology experience. Nine over-arching themes were identified, falling into three domains, which when present, were facilitators, and if absent, were barriers: evidence (intervention credibility, experienced efficacy, perceived need for intervention); context (positive attitude to and capacity for survivorship/FCR care, favourable therapist orientation and flexibility, strong referral pathways); and facilitation of implementation (intervention/service fit, intervention/patient fit, and training, support, and provided resources). CONCLUSIONS: ConquerFear is a sustainable intervention in routine clinical practise. Facilitators included a sound evidence base; a receptive context; good fit between the intervention, therapist orientation, and patient need; and flexibility of delivery. Where absent, these factors served as barriers. These results have implications for enhancing uptake of psycho-oncology interventions in routine care.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Neoplasias/psicología , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/organización & administración , Trastornos Fóbicos/prevención & control , Psicooncología/organización & administración , Adulto , Miedo/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/terapia , Psicoterapia/métodos , Investigación Cualitativa , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
7.
Cancer Rep (Hoboken) ; 2(4): e1172, 2019 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32721129

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is among the top unmet concerns reported by breast cancer survivors. Despite the sizable literature on FCR, few theoretical models have been empirically tested. One of the most cited is the FCR model. AIM: This study seeks to understand the nature of women's cognitive and emotional issues from FCR using specific guidance from the model by Lee-Jones and to provide suggestions for modifications to the model based on empirical results from the reported experiences of women living with breast cancer. METHODS AND RESULTS: A qualitative descriptive study using semi-structured interviews was conducted at an urban hospital. Recruited by convenience sampling, 12 breast cancer survivors concerned with FCR and who had recently completed active treatment participated in the study. Seven thematic categories emerged from the women's descriptions of their cognitive and emotional experiences with FCR: (a) FCR is always there; (b) beliefs about risk of recurrence; (c) beliefs about eradication of cancer; (d) preferences not to seek information about recurrence; (e) derailment of normal life; (f) worries related to recurrence; and (g) need for support. Adjustments to the model by Lee-Jones et al1 specifically to women living with breast cancer include the addition of new variables-the fear is always present, a preference not to seek information, and the need for support beyond treatment-and the merging of two variables, anxiety and worry, as participants viewed these concepts as interchangeable and experienced in similar ways. Lastly, participants did not report any remorse related to not opting for more aggressive treatments. CONCLUSION: The refinement of a more comprehensive FCR theoretical model, such as through the modifications derived from this study, provides a deeper understanding of breast cancer survivors' experiences with FCR and can more effectively guide health care professionals to develop appropriately tailored interventions aimed at decreasing FCR levels.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/psicología , Supervivientes de Cáncer/psicología , Modelos Psicológicos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/psicología , Trastornos Fóbicos/psicología , Adulto , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Miedo/psicología , Femenino , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Conducta en la Búsqueda de Información , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos Fóbicos/etiología , Trastornos Fóbicos/prevención & control , Sistemas de Apoyo Psicosocial , Investigación Cualitativa , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
8.
Rev Pneumol Clin ; 74(4): 221-225, 2018 Sep.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29502895

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Nicotine replacement therapies remain the main validated treatment to stop smoking. Nevertheless, treatment acceptance deals with patients negative representations. This "nicotinophobia" could be the main barrier to treatment acceptance and as a consequence would be at the origin of numerous failures of smoking cessation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We estimated the efficiency of an educational collective workshop to fight against nicotinophobia in patients smokers hospitalized for cardiovascular and pulmonary rehabilitation. RESULTS: Smoking cessation was significantly improved in patients who participated at the workshop (81 vs. 48 %), associated with a significant decrease of anxiety-depression scores, and without significant weight gain (average loss of 2.8kg). CONCLUSION: Educational approaches seem to help a majority of patient smokers to stop smoking, without anxiety and without weight gain. These results encourage the creation of a real therapeutic educational program dedicated to smoking cessation.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Ansiedad/prevención & control , Rehabilitación Cardiaca , Enfermedades Pulmonares/rehabilitación , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Trastornos Fóbicos/prevención & control , Fumadores/educación , Trastornos de Ansiedad/etiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etiología , Depresión/etiología , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Enfermedades Pulmonares/etiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos Fóbicos/etiología , Fumar/efectos adversos , Fumar/psicología , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/psicología , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
Clin J Pain ; 34(1): 44-52, 2018 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28514231

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to first compare the effects of a preoperative treatment combining pain neuroscience education (PNE) with knee joint mobilization versus biomedical education with knee joint mobilization on central sensitization (CS) in patients with knee osteoarthritis, both before and after surgery. Second, we wanted to compare the effects of both interventions on knee pain, disability, and psychosocial variables. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-four patients with knee osteoarthritis were allocated to receive 4 sessions of either PNE combined with knee joint mobilization or biomedical education with knee joint mobilization before surgery. All participants completed self-administered questionnaires and quantitative sensory testing was performed at baseline, after treatment and at a 1 month follow-up (all before surgery), and at 3 months after surgery. RESULTS: Significant and clinically relevant differences before and after surgery were found after treatments for both knee pain and disability, and some measures of CS (ie, widespread hyperalgesia, CS inventory), with no significant between-group differences. Other indicators of CS (ie, conditioned pain modulation, temporal summation) did not change over time following either treatment, and in some occasions the observed changes were not in the expected direction. Patients receiving PNE with knee joint mobilization achieved greater improvements in psychosocial variables (pain catastrophizing, kinesiophobia) both before and after surgery. DISCUSSION: Preoperative PNE combined with knee joint mobilization did not produce any additional benefits over time for knee pain and disability, and CS measures compared with biomedical education with knee joint mobilization. Superior effects in the PNE with knee joint mobilization group were only observed for psychosocial variables related to pain catastrophizing and kinesiophobia.


Asunto(s)
Manipulación Ortopédica/métodos , Neurociencias , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/terapia , Dolor/psicología , Cuidados Preoperatorios/educación , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Análisis de Varianza , Catastrofización/prevención & control , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Articulación de la Rodilla/fisiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neurociencias/educación , Neurociencias/métodos , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/psicología , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Dimensión del Dolor , Trastornos Fóbicos/prevención & control , Trastornos Fóbicos/psicología , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Cuidados Preoperatorios/psicología
11.
BMC Cancer ; 13: 201, 2013 Apr 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23617696

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Up to 70% of cancer survivors report clinically significant levels of fear of cancer recurrence (FCR). Despite the known negative impact of FCR on psychological wellbeing and quality of life, little research has investigated interventions for high FCR. Our team has developed and piloted a novel intervention (Conquer Fear) based on the Self-Regulatory Executive Function Model and Relational Frame Theory and is evaluating Conquer Fear in a randomised controlled trial (RCT). We aim to compare the efficacy and cost-efficacy of the Conquer Fear Intervention and relaxation training in reducing the impact of FCR. METHODS/DESIGN: This study is a multi-centre RCT with 260 participants randomised either to the Conquer Fear Intervention or relaxation training. Both interventions will be delivered in five sessions over 10 weeks by trained psychologists, psychiatrists and social workers with five or more years experience in oncology. Conquer Fear sessions use attentional training, detached mindfulness, meta-cognitive therapy, values clarification and psycho-education to help patients change the way they regulate and respond to thoughts about cancer recurrence. Relaxation training includes training in progressive and passive muscle relaxation, meditative relaxation, visualisation and "quick relaxation" techniques. Relaxation was chosen to control for therapist time and attention and has good face-validity as an intervention. The primary outcome is fear of cancer recurrence. Secondary outcomes include distress, quality of life, unmet needs, and health care utilisation. Participants complete questionnaires prior to starting the intervention, immediately after completing the intervention, 3 and 6 months later. Eligible participants are early-stage breast or colorectal cancer survivors who have completed hospital-based treatment between 2 months and 5 years prior to study entry and report a score in the clinical range on the Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory. The biostatistician is blinded to group allocation and participants are blinded to which intervention is being evaluated. Randomisation is computer generated, stratified by therapist, and uses sequentially numbered sealed envelopes. DISCUSSION: If successful, the study will provide an evidence-based intervention to reduce psychological morbidity in cancer survivors, and reduce overall health care costs due to more appropriate use of follow-up care and other health services in this very large population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12612000404820.


Asunto(s)
Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/métodos , Miedo/psicología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/psicología , Neoplasias/psicología , Trastornos Fóbicos/prevención & control , Estrés Psicológico/prevención & control , Sobrevivientes/psicología , Adaptación Psicológica , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/terapia , Neoplasias/terapia , Proyectos Piloto , Pronóstico , Calidad de Vida , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
12.
Br J Nurs ; 21(14): S18-22, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23252177

RESUMEN

For some patients, even looking at a needle is enough to make them feel anxious. Repeated cannulation for bloods and all other intravenous therapies, such as scans and chemotherapy treatment can become so frightening that they escalate to feeling overwhelmed and panicky. If this response persists without any intervention, it may eventually become a phobia (Choy et al, 2007). Four-hundred-thousand patients are treated at The Christie NHS Foundation Trust each year, with many receiving intravenous chemotherapy treatments. The 'CALM' service was initiated over 5 years ago to enable and support patients to achieve a calm state during procedural-related anxieties and panic. Thanks to recent funding from 'Walk the Walk' Breast Cancer Charity, the service has grown, enabling more patients to access the service. Increasing skill has led to development of training courses for health professionals. The training provides easy-to-learn skills, some of which are described here, that can be used to prevent and/or interrupt panic states triggered by medical procedures.


Asunto(s)
Ansiedad/prevención & control , Cateterismo/psicología , Agujas , Trastornos Fóbicos/prevención & control , Estrés Psicológico/prevención & control , Ansiedad/enfermería , Cateterismo/enfermería , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Relaciones Enfermero-Paciente , Trastornos Fóbicos/enfermería , Estrés Psicológico/enfermería
13.
Compr Psychiatry ; 53(5): 630-7, 2012 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21944882

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Onset of social phobia (SP) typically occurs in adolescence. Short screening instruments for its assessment are needed for use in primary health and school settings. The 3-item Mini-Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN) has demonstrated effectiveness in screening for generalized SP (GSP) in adults. This study examined the psychometrics of the Mini-SPIN in an adolescent general population sample. METHODS: Three hundred fifty adolescents aged 12 to 17 years were clinically interviewed using the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version for identification of SP and other Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Axis I disorders, blind to their Mini-SPIN status. Associations between SP; subclinical SP; other anxiety, depressive, and disruptive disorders; and Mini-SPIN scores were examined, and diagnostic efficiency statistics were calculated. The association between Mini-SPIN scores and the generalized subtype of SP was also examined. RESULTS: As in adults, the Mini-SPIN items differentiated subjects with SP from those without. A score of 6 points or greater was found optimal in predicting SP with a sensitivity of 86%, specificity of 84%, and positive and negative predictive values of 26% and 99%. The Mini-SPIN also possessed discriminative validity, as scores were higher for adolescents with SP than they were for those with depressive, disruptive, and other anxiety disorders. The Mini-SPIN was also able to differentiate adolescents with GSP from the rest of the sample. CONCLUSIONS: The Mini-SPIN has good psychometrics for screening SP in adolescents from general population and may have value in screening for GSP.


Asunto(s)
Tamizaje Masivo , Inventario de Personalidad , Trastornos Fóbicos/prevención & control , Adolescente , Factores de Edad , Niño , Femenino , Finlandia , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos Fóbicos/clasificación , Psicometría , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Conducta Social
14.
PLoS One ; 6(8): e23494, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21887259

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Claustrophobia is a common problem precluding MR imaging. The purpose of the present study was to assess whether a short-bore or an open magnetic resonance (MR) scanner is superior in alleviating claustrophobia. METHODS: Institutional review board approval and patient informed consent were obtained to compare short-bore versus open MR. From June 2008 to August 2009, 174 patients (139 women; mean age = 53.1 [SD 12.8]) with an overall mean score of 2.4 (SD 0.7, range 0 to 4) on the Claustrophobia Questionnaire (CLQ) and a clinical indication for imaging, were randomly assigned to receive evaluation by open or by short-bore MR. The primary outcomes were incomplete MR examinations due to a claustrophobic event. Follow-up was conducted 7 months after MR imaging. The primary analysis was performed according to the intention-to-treat strategy. RESULTS: With 33 claustrophobic events in the short-bore group (39% [95% confidence interval [CI] 28% to 50%) versus 23 in the open scanner group (26% [95% CI 18% to 37%]; P = 0.08) the difference was not significant. Patients with an event were in the examination room for 3.8 min (SD 4.4) in the short-bore and for 8.5 min (SD 7) in the open group (P = 0.004). This was due to an earlier occurrence of events in the short-bore group. The CLQ suffocation subscale was significantly associated with the occurrence of claustrophobic events (P = 0.003). New findings that explained symptoms were found in 69% of MR examinations and led to changes in medical treatment in 47% and surgery in 10% of patients. After 7 months, perceived claustrophobia increased in 32% of patients with events versus in only 11% of patients without events (P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Even recent MR cannot prevent claustrophobia suggesting that further developments to create a more patient-centered MR scanner environment are needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00715806.


Asunto(s)
Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/instrumentación , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Trastornos Fóbicos/prevención & control , Ansiedad/complicaciones , Ansiedad/psicología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos Fóbicos/complicaciones , Trastornos Fóbicos/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
15.
Perspect Psychiatr Care ; 46(4): 266-78, 2010 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20883433

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to further assess the psychometric qualities of the Mini-Social Phobia Inventory (MS) to screen for social anxiety disorder (SAD). DESIGN AND METHODS: The MS and other self- and clinician-rated scales for anxiety and social anxiety were applied in 2,314 university students and in samples of SAD patients (n = 88) and nonpatients (n = 90). FINDINGS: The MS revealed adequate discriminative validity, internal consistency (α= 0.49-0.73), convergent validity with the Social Phobia Inventory, Brief Social Phobia Scale, and Self-Statements During Public Speaking Scale and convergent and divergent validity with the Beck Anxiety Inventory. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The MS has shown to be a fast and efficient screening instrument for SAD in different cultures and contexts.


Asunto(s)
Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Trastornos Fóbicos/prevención & control , Pruebas Psicológicas , Adolescente , Adulto , Brasil , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Análisis Multivariante , Psicometría , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
16.
Dent Clin North Am ; 54(4): 731-44, 2010 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20831935

RESUMEN

Needle phobia has profound health, dental, societal, and legal implications, and severe psychological, social, and physiologic consequences. There is genetic evidence for the physiologic response to needle puncture, and a significant familial psychological component, showing evidence of inheritance. Needle phobia is also a learned behavior. The dental practitioner must recognize patients with needle phobia before the administration of local anesthetics to identify patients who are potentially reactive and to prevent untoward sequelae. Needle phobia is highly associated with avoidance behavior, and the dentist must exhibit compassion and respect. To avoid bradycardia, hypotension, unconsciousness, convulsions, and possibly asystole, oral premedication with benzodiazepines or other antianxiety agents must be considered for patients who are needle phobic. Management of needle phobiaeinduced syncope includes perioperative monitoring, oxygen administration, positioning, atropine, and vasopressors.


Asunto(s)
Ansiedad al Tratamiento Odontológico/etiología , Agujas/efectos adversos , Trastornos Fóbicos/etiología , Síncope Vasovagal/etiología , Administración Tópica , Anestésicos Locales/administración & dosificación , Ansiolíticos/uso terapéutico , Arritmias Cardíacas/etiología , Reacción de Prevención , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual , Ansiedad al Tratamiento Odontológico/prevención & control , Desensibilización Psicológica , Electrocardiografía , Electroencefalografía , Humanos , Trastornos Fóbicos/complicaciones , Trastornos Fóbicos/genética , Trastornos Fóbicos/prevención & control , Medicación Preanestésica , Síncope Vasovagal/prevención & control , Vasoconstrictores/uso terapéutico
17.
Radiol. bras ; 43(1): 19-22, jan.-fev. 2010. tab
Artículo en Portugués | LILACS | ID: lil-542684

RESUMEN

OBJETIVO: Testar a eficácia da hipnose para o controle de claustrofobia em pacientes submetidos a exames de ressonância magnética. MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: Vinte pacientes claustrofóbicos, com indicação de sedação para ressonância magnética, foram submetidos a hipnose pela técnica de Braid. Os pacientes suscetíveis à hipnose foram encaminhados para realização do exame em estado de transe hipnótico, sem uso de medicamentos para sedação. RESULTADOS: Da amostra estudada, 18 casos (90 por cento) foram suscetíveis à técnica. Dos 16 pacientes sensíveis à hipnose que compareceram para a ressonância magnética, 15 (93,8 por cento) realizaram o exame em transe hipnótico, sem ocorrência de crise de claustrofobia e sem necessitar de medicamentos para sedação. CONCLUSÃO: Hipnose é uma alternativa para a sedação medicamentosa em pacientes claustrofóbicos que necessitam realizar ressonância magnética.


OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of hypnosis for management of claustrophobia in patients submitted to magnetic resonance imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty claustrophobic patients referred for magnetic resonance imaging under sedation were submitted to hypnosis using the Braid technique. The patients susceptible to hypnosis were submitted to magnetic resonance imaging under hypnotic trance without using sedative drugs. RESULTS: Out of the sample, 18 (90 percent) patients were susceptible to the technique. Of the 16 hypnotizable subjects who were submitted to magnetic resonance imaging, 15 (93.8 percent) could complete the examination under hypnotic trance, with no sign of claustrophobia and without need of sedative drugs. CONCLUSION: Hypnosis is an alternative to anesthetic sedation for claustrophobic patients who must undergo magnetic resonance imaging.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Hipnosis/instrumentación , Hipnosis/métodos , Trastornos Fóbicos/prevención & control , Espectroscopía de Resonancia Magnética
18.
Acta Psychiatr Scand ; 119(1): 62-70, 2009 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18840255

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study seeks to examine the incidence of social phobia in the general population and to establish a number of risk indicators. METHOD: Data were derived from the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study (NEMESIS) which is a population based prospective study (n=7076). A sample of adults aged 18-64 years (n=5618) were re-interviewed 1 year later using Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). RESULTS: The 12-month incidence of DSM-III-R social phobia was 1.0%. Low education, low mastery, low self-esteem, emotional neglect in childhood and ongoing difficulties were found to be risk indicators. After including other mental disorders as risk indicators in the model, the incidence was found to be more common among those with low mastery, major depression, subthreshold social phobia, emotional neglect, negative life events, and low education. CONCLUSION: The incidence of social phobia can be predicted relatively well with psychosocial variables and comorbidity.


Asunto(s)
Modelos Psicológicos , Trastornos Fóbicos/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Carácter , Comorbilidad , Estudios Transversales , Manual Diagnóstico y Estadístico de los Trastornos Mentales , Femenino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Incidencia , Entrevista Psicológica , Acontecimientos que Cambian la Vida , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo , Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos Fóbicos/diagnóstico , Trastornos Fóbicos/etiología , Trastornos Fóbicos/prevención & control , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto Joven
19.
Med J Aust ; 187(5): 266-9, 2007 Sep 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17767429

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the beliefs of young people and their parents about the role of alcohol, tobacco and marijuana in the prevention and treatment of mental disorders. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Between May and August 2006, a national computer-assisted telephone survey was conducted on a representative sample of Australian youths aged 12-25 years. 3746 young people and 2005 of their parents were presented with a case vignette portraying psychosis, depression, depression with alcohol misuse, or social phobia in a young person. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Participants' beliefs regarding the role of substance use in preventing or dealing with mental disorders in young people. RESULTS: Over 85% of participants agreed that alcohol, tobacco and marijuana were harmful for the young people in the vignettes, and over 80% of youths agreed that not using marijuana or drinking alcohol in excess would reduce the risk of developing a similar problem. CONCLUSION: Young people and their parents are fully aware of the negative impact of substance use on mental disorders. Translating this knowledge into behavioural change will be a major challenge for future public health campaigns.


Asunto(s)
Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/prevención & control , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Fumar Marihuana/prevención & control , Trastornos Mentales/prevención & control , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar , Adolescente , Conducta del Adolescente , Adulto , Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/efectos adversos , Australia , Niño , Trastorno Depresivo/etiología , Trastorno Depresivo/prevención & control , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Fumar Marihuana/efectos adversos , Trastornos Mentales/etiología , Padres , Trastornos Fóbicos/etiología , Trastornos Fóbicos/prevención & control , Factores de Riesgo , Esquizofrenia/etiología , Esquizofrenia/prevención & control , Fumar/efectos adversos
20.
J Perianesth Nurs ; 22(5): 322-9, 2007 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17900504

RESUMEN

Needle phobia is a peculiar type of specific phobia, with unique clinical features, that may be encountered in some surgical patients. It may present a serious acute problem to the perianesthesia care team and requires careful psychological and/or pharmacological management. This article provides a clinical report and detailed discussion of severe needle phobia in the perianesthesia setting.


Asunto(s)
Inyecciones/efectos adversos , Agujas/efectos adversos , Trastornos Fóbicos/prevención & control , Enfermedad Aguda , Adulto , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios , Desensibilización Psicológica , Epilepsias Parciales/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/uso terapéutico , Inyecciones/psicología , Lidocaína/uso terapéutico , Combinación Lidocaína y Prilocaína , Masculino , Midazolam/uso terapéutico , Rol de la Enfermera , Atención Perioperativa , Trastornos Fóbicos/complicaciones , Enfermería Posanestésica , Medicación Preanestésica , Prilocaína/uso terapéutico , Agitación Psicomotora/etiología , Derivación y Consulta , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Síncope/etiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA