Possible adverse events of imidazole antifungal drugs during treatment of vulvovaginal candidiasis: analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.

Azole antifungal drugs are commonly used to treat vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC). The nephrotoxicity and developmental toxicity of azole drugs have not been systematically analyzed in the real world. We used the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to investigate the adverse events (AEs) associated with imidazole therapy for VVC. FAERS data (from quarter 1 2004 to quarter 3 2022) were retrieved using OpenVigil 2.1, and AEs were retrieved and standardized according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA). In the top 10 System Organ Class (SOC), all four drugs have been found to have kidney and urinary system diseases and pregnancy. We found significant signals, including clotrimazole [bladder transitional cell carcinoma, (report odds ratio, ROR = 291.66)], [fetal death, (ROR = 10.28)], ketoconazole[nephrogenic anemia (ROR = 22.1)], [premature rupture of membranes (ROR = 22.91 46.45, 11, 3)], Miconazole[hematuria (ROR = 19.03)], [neonatal sepsis (ROR = 123.71)], [spontaneous abortion (ROR = 5.98)], Econazole [acute kidney injury (ROR = 4.41)], [spontaneous abortion (ROR = 19.62)]. We also discovered new adverse reactions that were not reported. Therefore, when using imidazole drugs for treatment, it is necessary to closely monitor the patient's renal function, pay attention to the developmental toxicity of the fetus during pregnancy, and be aware of potential adverse reactions that may occur.

THPdb2: compilation of FDA approved therapeutic peptides and proteins.

During the past 20 years, there has been a significant increase in the number of protein-based drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). This paper presents THPdb2, an updated version of the THPdb database, which holds information about all types of protein-based drugs, including peptides, antibodies, and biosimilar proteins. THPdb2 contains a total of 6,385 entries, providing comprehensive information about 894 FDA-approved therapeutic proteins, including 354 monoclonal antibodies and 85 peptides or polypeptides. Each entry includes the name of therapeutic molecule, the amino acid sequence, physical and chemical properties, and route of drug administration. The therapeutic molecules that are included in the database target a wide range of biological molecules, such as receptors, factors, and proteins, and have been approved for the treatment of various diseases, including cancers, infectious diseases, and immune disorders.

Optimus-Era Dose Finding for Rare Cancers.

SUMMARY: Advances in cancer biology and diagnostics have led to the recognition of a multitude of rare cancer subtypes, emphasizing the pressing need for strategies to accelerate drug development for patients with these cancers. This paper addresses the unique challenges of dose finding in trials that accrue small numbers of patients with rare cancers; strategies for dose optimization are proposed, in line with evolving approaches to dose determination in the age of the US Food and Drug Administration's Project Optimus.

Exploring anticancer properties of the phytoconstituents and comparative analysis of their chemical space parameters with USFDA-approved synthetic anticancer agents.

The present review article thoroughly analyses natural products and their derived phytoconstituents as a rich source of plausible anticancer drugs. The study thoroughly explores the chemical components derived from various natural sources, thus emphasizing their unique structural characteristics and therapeutic potential as an anticancer agent. The review contains the critical chemical constituents' in-depth molecular mechanisms, their source's chemical structures and the categories. The review also comprises an exhaustive and comprehensive analysis of different chemical spacing parameters of the anticancer agents derived from natural products. It compares them with USFDA-approved synthetic anticancer drugs up to 2020, thus providing a meaningful understanding of the relationship between natural and synthetic compounds portraying the anticancer assets. The review also delves more deeply into the chemical analysis of the heterocyclic moieties from the natural product arena, illustrating the anticancer mechanisms. The present article is, therefore, expected to serve as a valuable resource for natural product and medicinal chemists, encouraging and promoting an integrated approach to exploit the potential of natural products in drug discovery development and translational research, which have a prerequisite of bench to bedside approach. The work could guide researchers toward innovative approaches for the ever-evolving field of anticancer drug discovery.

Immune-related adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with angiogenesis inhibitors: A real-world pharmacovigilance analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database (2014-2022).

INTRODUCTION: Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with angiogenesis inhibitors (AGIs) has become increasingly used for cancers, the impact of combination therapy on immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in real-world settings has not been well elucidated to date. METHODS: The FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database from 2014 to 2022 was retrospectively queried to extract reports of irAEs referred as standardized MedDRA queries (SMQs), preferred terms (PTs) and system organ classes (SOCs). To perform disproportionality analysis, information component (IC) and reporting odds ratio (ROR) were calculated and lower limit of 95 % confidence interval (CI) for IC (IC025) > 0 or ROR (ROR025) > 1 with at least 3 reports was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Compared to ICIs alone, ICIs + AGIs demonstrated a lower IC025/ROR025 for irAEs-SMQ (2.343/5.082 vs. 1.826/3.563). Regarding irAEs-PTs, there were fewer irAEs-PTs of significant value in ICIs + AGIs than ICIs alone (57 vs. 150 PTs) and lower signal value for most PTs (88 %) in ICIs + AGIs. Moreover, lower IC025 for most of irAEs-SOCs in ICIs + AGIs (11/13) compared with ICIs alone was observed. As for outcomes of irAEs, ICIs + AGIs showed a lower frequency of "fatal" for irAEs-SMQ than ICIs alone (4.88 % vs. 7.83 %), so as in cardiac disorder (SOC) (15.45 % vs. 26.37 %), and respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders (SOC) (13.74 % vs. 20.06 %). Similarly, there were lower occurrence and fewer fatality of irAEs in ICIs + AGIs + chemotherapy (CT) than ICIs + CT. CONCLUSION: ICIs combined with AGIs may reduce incidence and mortality for most of irAEs compared to ICIs alone whether or not with CT.

Analysis of post-market adverse events of tafamidis base on the FDA adverse event reporting system.

Tafamidis is the world's first and only oral drug approved to treat the rare disease transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM). Medicines are known to have different adverse reactions during the course of treatment. However, the current limited clinical studies did not identify significant adverse drug reactions to tafamidis. Tafamidis has been on the market for 5 years now, a large number of adverse drug event (ADE) reports with tafamidis as the primary suspected drug have been reported in the United Food and Drug Administration's adverse event reporting system (FAERS). We retrieved 8170 adverse event reports in FAERS with tafamidis as the first suspected drug, and mined these reports for positive signals to perform risk warnings for potentially possible adverse events with tafamidis. We found that a large number of adverse events associated with the primary disease were reported due to insufficient awareness of ATTR among the reporters, leading to a large number of positive signals reported in the cardiac disorders system. We also found that tafamidis has the potential to cause an adverse event risks of ear and labyrinth disorders system and urinary tract infection bacterial, which deserve continued clinical attention.

A retrospective analysis of drugs associated with the development of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma reported by patients on the FDA's adverse events reporting system.

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is the second most common type of skin cancer arising from squamous cells of the epidermis. Most cases of cSCC have a good prognosis if detected and treated early; however, certain cases can be aggressive. The primary risk factor for cSCC is prolonged ultraviolet radiation from sun exposure, leading to DNA mutations. Other risk factors have also been observed, including adverse reactions to medications, particularly immunosuppressants. A query of the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS) was done, and all reported events of cSCC as adverse events to medication were recorded along with demographic data of patients affected. A total of 4,792 cases of cSCC as an adverse event to medication were reported between 1997 and 2023. Lenalidomide, a chemotherapeutic drug, had the most cases of cSCC as an adverse event. Nine of the top 10 drugs associated with cSCC had immunosuppressive characteristics. While males had higher odds of cSCC associated with corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors, females had higher odds of cSCC related to monoclonal antibodies. Geriatric patients accounted for the majority of cSCC cases at 59.7%. Drawing on data from the FAERS database, there's been a consistent increase in cSCC cases as a side-effect to certain medications, with most having immunosuppressive characteristics. Since there is a lack of up-to-date literature overviewing the most implicated medications for cSCC, we aimed to illustrate this better, as well as patient demographics, to better guide clinicians when prescribing these medications.

Lifileucel: the first cellular therapy approved for solid tumours.

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of lifileucel, for advanced melanoma, represents the first cellular therapy to reach the clinic for solid cancers. Here, we summarise this landmark approval, consider the associated regulatory pathway, and evaluate the challenges that remain to ensure effective implementation of this advanced 'living' therapy.

[Advances of monoclonal antibodies and analysis of marketed antibody drugs].

In recent years, there has been a frequent occurrence of various epidemics worldwide such as COVID-19, monkeypox, influenza, and others additionally, there has been an increase in the number of new patients diagnosed with various types of tumors. Traditional drugs have limited effectiveness against emerging infectious diseases, tumors, and autoimmune diseases. However, with the emergence of hybridoma technology, monoclonal antibodies have achieved extensive applications and antibody drugs are playing an important role in modern medicine. Monoclonal antibodies have undergone various development stages, starting from mouse-derived antibodies to human-mouse chimeric antibodies, humanized antibodies, and ultimately human antibodies. Throughout this process, their immunogenicity has gradually decreased, while their safety for human use steadily increased. Fully human antibodies are currently the safest form of antibody, because their sequences all come from human sources and they do not induce human anti-murine antibody reactions. With the advance of genetic engineering technology, flow cytometry coupled to single B cell gene amplification technology has made it easier to construct and screen for fully human monoclonal antibodies. The development of antibody drugs has provided new opportunities, and the market for monoclonal antibody drugs will further expand. This article reviews the research progress of monoclonal antibodies and presents information on the 163 monoclonal antibody drugs approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as of Oct 1st, 2023. The aim is to offer new insights for the development and production of monoclonal antibodies in China.

Contribution of aldehyde oxidase to methotrexate-induced hepatotoxicity: in vitro and pharmacoepidemiological approaches.

BACKGROUND: Methotrexate (MTX) is partially metabolized by aldehyde oxidase (AOX) in the liver and its clinical impact remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to demonstrate how AOX contributes to MTX-induced hepatotoxicity in vitro and clarify the relationship between concomitant AOX inhibitor use and MTX-associated liver injury development using the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). METHODS: We assessed intracellular MTX accumulation and cytotoxicity using HepG2 cells. We used the FAERS database to detect reporting odds ratio (ROR)-based MTX-related hepatotoxicity event signals. RESULTS: AOX inhibition by AOX inhibitor raloxifene and siRNA increased the MTX accumulation in HepG2 cells and enhanced the MTX-induced cell viability reduction. In the FAERS analysis, the ROR for MTX-related hepatotoxicity increased with non-overlap of 95% confidence interval when co-administered with drugs with higher Imax, u (maximum unbound plasma concentration)/IC50 (half-maximal inhibitory concentration for inhibition of AOX) calculated based on reported pharmacokinetic data. CONCLUSION: AOX inhibition contributed to MTX accumulation in the liver, resulting in increased hepatotoxicity. Our study raises concerns regarding MTX-related hepatotoxicity when co-administered with drugs that possibly inhibit AOX activity at clinical concentrations.

Overall survival benefits of cancer drugs initially approved by the US Food and Drug Administration on the basis of immature survival data: a retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: New cancer drugs can be approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on the basis of surrogate endpoints while data on overall survival are still incomplete or immature, with too few deaths for meaningful analysis. We aimed to evaluate whether clinical trials with immature survival data generated evidence of overall survival benefit during the period after marketing authorisation, and where that evidence was reported. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, we searched Drugs@FDA to identify cancer drug indications approved between Jan 1, 2001, and Dec 31, 2018, on the basis of immature survival data. We systematically collected publicly available data on postapproval overall survival results in labelling (Drugs@FDA), journal publications (MEDLINE via PubMed), and clinical trial registries (ClinicalTrials.gov). The primary outcome was availability of statistically significant overall survival benefits during the period after marketing authorisation (until March 31, 2023). Additionally, we evaluated the availability and timing of overall survival findings in labelling, journal publications, and ClinicalTrials.gov records. FINDINGS: During the study period, the FDA granted marketing authorisation to 223 cancer drug indications, 95 of which had overall survival as an endpoint. 39 (41%) of these 95 indications had immature survival data. After a minimum of 4·3 years of follow-up during the period after marketing authorisation (and median 8·2 years [IQR 5·3-12·0] since FDA approval), additional survival data from the pivotal trials became available in either revised labelling or publications, or both, for 38 (97%) of 39 indications. Additional data on overall survival showed a statistically significant benefit in 12 (32%) of 38 indications, whereas mature data yielded statistically non-significant overall survival findings for 24 (63%) indications. Statistically significant evidence of overall survival benefit was reported in either labelling or publications a median of 1·5 years (IQR 0·8-2·3) after initial approval. The median time to availability of statistically non-significant overall survival results was 3·3 years (2·2-4·5). The availability of overall survival results on ClinicalTrials.gov varied considerably. INTERPRETATION: Fewer than a third of indications approved with immature survival data showed a statistically significant overall survival benefit after approval. Notable inconsistencies in timing and availability of information after approval across different sources emphasise the need for better reporting standards. FUNDING: None.

Adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer: a safety analysis of clinical trials and FDA pharmacovigilance system.

Objectives: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the application of ICIs can also cause treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) and immune-related adverse events (irAEs). This study was to evaluate both the irAEs and trAEs of different ICI strategies for NSCLC based on randomized clinical trials (RCTs). The study also examined real-world pharmacovigilance data from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) regarding claimed ICI-associated AEs in clinical practice. Methods: Based on Pubmed, Embase, Medline, and the Cochrane CENTRAL, we retrieved RCTs comparing ICIs with chemotherapy drugs or with different ICI regimens for the treatment of NSCLC up to October 20, 2023. Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed using odds ratios (ORs) with 95% credible intervals (95%CrI). Separately, a retrospective pharmacovigilance study was performed based on FAERS database, extracting ICI-associated AEs in NSCLC patients between the first quarter (Q1) of 2004 and Q4 of 2023. The proportional reports reporting odds ratio was calculated to analyze the disproportionality. Results: The NMA included 51 RCTs that involved a total of 26,958 patients with NSCLC. Based on the lowest risk of any trAEs, cemiplimab, tislelizumab, and durvalumab were ranked as the best. Among the agents associated with the lowest risk of grades 3-5 trAEs, tislelizumab, avelumab, and nivolumab were most likely to rank highest. As far as any or grades 3-5 irAEs are concerned, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab plus chemotherapy is considered the most safety option. However, it is associated with a high risk of grades 3-5 trAEs. As a result of FAERS pharmacovigilance data analysis, 9,420 AEs cases have been identified in 7,339 NSCLC patients treated with ICIs, and ICIs were related to statistically significant positive signal with 311 preferred terms (PTs), and comprehensively investigated and identified those AEs highly associated with ICIs. In total, 152 significant signals were associated with Nivolumab, with malignant neoplasm progression, death, and hypothyroidism being the most frequent PTs. Conclusion: These findings revealed that ICIs differed in their safety profile. ICI treatment strategies can be improved and preventive methods can be developed for NSCLC patients based on our results.

Beyond the Label: Real-World Side Effects Experienced With FDA-Approved Drugs for Non-Melanoma Skin Cancers.

With immunotherapy historically focused on cutaneous melanoma, there has been a new wave of systemic medications available for treating non-melanoma skin cancers including basal cell carcinoma (BCC), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC). The immune checkpoint inhibitors approved by the FDA target programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and the Hedgehog (Hh) signaling pathway. These medications have expanded treatment options; however, side effects are an important consideration. We used the FDA Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS) to characterize the most prevalent, real-world side effects experienced by patients on these agents. Muscle spasms (23.45%), alopecia (16.06%), ageusia (12.02%), taste disorder (11.91%), and fatigue (11.67%) were the five most common side effects reported with medications used for BCC treatment. Logistic regression analysis showed males on vismodegib for BCC having greater odds of experiencing muscle spasms (aOR 1.33, P<0.001) and ageusia (aOR 1.34,  P<0.001) versus females, who were more likely to exhibit alopecia (aOR 1.82, P<0.001) and nausea (aOR 1.96, P<0.001). With SCC treatment, the 5 most reported adverse events were fatigue (5.58%), rash (3.59%), asthenia (3.59%), pruritus (3.19%), and pyrexia (2.79%). Patients taking cemiplimab-rwlc for BCC compared to SCC were more likely to experience disease progression (aOR 10.98, P=0.02). With medication labels providing an excessively daunting list of side effects, we characterize practical side effects seen in patients receiving systemic treatments for non-melanoma skin cancers.  J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(5):301-305. doi:10.36849/JDD.7968.