Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy Combined With Portal-Superior Mesenteric Vein Resection and Reconstruction: Inferior-Posterior "Superior Mesenteric Artery-First" Approach.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) with portal-superior mesenteric vein (PV/SMV) resection and reconstruction is increasingly performed. We aimed to introduce a safe and effective surgical approach and share our clinical experience with LPD with PV/SMV resection and reconstruction. METHODS: We reviewed data for the patients undergoing LPD and open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) combined with PV/SMV resection and reconstruction at the First Hospital of Jilin University between April 2021 and May 2023. The inferior-posterior "superior mesenteric artery-first" approach was used. We compared the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative clinicopathological data of the 2 groups to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of LPD with major vascular resection. RESULTS: A cohort of 37 patients with periampullary and pancreatic tumors underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with major vascular resection and reconstruction, consisting of 21 LPDs and 16 OPDs. The LPD group had a longer operation time (322 vs. 235 min, P =0.039), reduced intraoperative bleeding (152 vs. 325 mL, P =0.026), and lower intraoperative blood transfusion rates (19.0% vs. 50.0%, P =0.046) compared with the OPD group. The LPD group had significantly shorter operation times in end-to-end anastomosis (26 vs. 15 min, P =0.001) and artificial grafts vascular reconstruction (44 vs. 22 min, P =0.000) compared with the OPD group. There was no significant difference in the rate of R0 resection (100% vs. 87.5%, P =0.096). The length of hospital stay and ICU stay did not show significant differences between the 2 groups (15 vs. 18 d, P =0.636 and 2.5 vs. 4.5 d, P =0.726, respectively). However, the postoperative hospital stay in the LPD group was notably shorter compared with the OPD group (11 vs. 16 d, P =0.007). Postoperative complication rates, including postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) Grade A/B, biliary leakage, and delayed gastric emptying (DGE), were similar between the two groups (38.1% vs. 43.8%, P =0.729). In addition, 1 patient in each group developed thrombosis, with vascular patency improving after anticoagulation treatment. CONCLUSION: LPD combined with PV/SMV resection and reconstruction can be easily and safely performed using the inferior-posterior "superior mesenteric artery-first" approach in cases of venous invasion. Further studies are required to evaluate the procedure's long-term outcomes.

A case of robot-assisted resection for cecum cancer with anomalous venous confluence.

There are many reports on the positional relationship between the ileocolic artery and superior mesenteric vein (SMV). However, there have been no reports of anomalous venous confluence in the ileocecal vessel area. A 69-year-old man was diagnosed with cecal cancer on a preoperative examination of a lung tumor. We planned to perform surgery for the cecal cancer. Computed tomography angiography revealed an anomalous vein confluence in the ileocolic region. We performed robot-assisted ileocecal resection. Although the small intestinal vein was misidentified as the SMV at first, we confirmed the misidentification, identified the SMV on the dorsal side of the ileocolic artery, and ligated the ileocolic vessels with precise forceps manipulation during robotic surgery. Especially for cases with vascular anomalies revealed by preoperative computed tomography angiography, robotic surgery may be useful, as flexible forceps manipulation prevents vascular injury.

Jejunal vein tributary analysis and intraoperative clamp testing in avoiding congestion after pancreatoduodenectomy.

PURPOSE: Although venous drainage of the jejunal loop may be maintained after sacrifice of jejunal vein tributaries during pancreatoduodenectomy, risk of severe jejunal mesenteric congestion following division of these tributaries can be difficult to predict. This study considered how best to predict safety of jejunal vein tributary dissection. METHODS: Preoperative imaging findings and results of intraoperative clamp tests of jejunal vein tributaries during pancreatoduodenectomy were analyzed in 121 patients with hepatobiliary and pancreatic disease to determine whether this information adequately predicted safety of resecting superior mesenteric vein branches. RESULTS: Jejunal vein tributaries caudal to the inferior border of the pancreatic uncinate process tended to be fewer when tributaries cranial to this landmark were more numerous. Tributaries cranial to the border drained a relatively wide expanse of jejunal artery territory in the jejunal mesentery. The territory of jejunal tributaries cranial to the inferior border of the pancreas did not vary according to course of the first jejunal vein branch relative to the superior mesenteric artery. One patient among 30 (3%) who underwent intraoperative clamp tests of tributaries cranial to the border showed severe congestion in relation to a venous tributary coursing ventrally to the superior mesenteric artery. CONCLUSION: Jejunal venous tributaries drained an extensive portion of jejunal arterial territory, but tributaries located cranially to the inferior border of the pancreas could be sacrificed without congestion in nearly all patients. Intraoperative clamp testing of these tributaries can identify patients whose jejunal veins must be preserved to avoid congestion.

Robotic True D3 Lymph Node Dissection With Superior Mesenteric Vein-Taping Technique for Right-Sided Colon Cancer.

BACKGROUND: D3 is unaffected by anatomic factors even when the ileocolic artery runs along the dorsal side of the superior mesenteric vein. Complete "true D3" lymph node dissection in minimally invasive surgery for right-sided colon cancer could be beneficial for certain patients with lymph node metastases. IMPACT OF INNOVATION: The study aimed to determine the safety and feasibility of robotic true D3 lymph node dissection for right-sided colon cancer using a superior mesenteric vein-taping technique. TECHNOLOGY, MATERIALS, AND METHODS: The superior mesenteric vein was slowly and gently separated from the surrounding tissues and taped. Lifting the tape with the robotic third arm and fixing it in place using rock-stable tractions provides a good surgical view, which cannot otherwise be obtained. As a result, the ileocolic artery that branches from the superior mesenteric artery can be accurately exposed. Handling of the taping then enables expansion to a different surgical view. As the lymph nodes are originally concealed on the dorsal side of the superior mesenteric vein, this technique provides a good view for lymph node dissection. The root of the ileocolic artery was clipped and separated, and true D3 was thus completed. PRELIMINARY RESULTS: Fourteen patients underwent robotic true D3 lymph node dissection for right-sided colon cancer. No Clavien-Dindo classification grade II or higher intraoperative or postoperative complications were observed. The 30-day mortality rate was 0%. CONCLUSIONS: Our robotic true D3 lymph node dissection with superior mesenteric vein-taping technique is considered safe and feasible; it might be a promising surgical procedure for treating advanced right-sided colon cancer. FUTURE DIRECTIONS: Even when the ileocolic artery runs along the dorsal aspect of the superior mesenteric vein, the technique seems promising for facilitating robotic D3 lymph node dissection.

Feasibility of venous cuff using an open round ligament or inferior mesenteric vein around the hepatic vein for a left lobe graft in living-donor liver transplantation.

Living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is an established treatment for patients with end-stage liver disease or acute liver failure, and outflow reconstruction is considered one of the most vital techniques in LDLT. To date, many strategies have been reported to prevent outflow obstruction, which can be refractory to liver dysfunction and can cause life-threatening graft loss or mortality. In addition, in this era of laparoscopic hepatectomy in donor surgery, especially LDLT using a left liver graft, it has been predicted that cutting the hepatic vein with automatic linear staplers will lead to more outflow-related problems than with conventional open hepatectomy because of the short neck of the anastomosis orifice. We herein review 10 cases of venoplasty performed with a novel venous cuff system using a donor's round ligament around the hepatic vein in LDLT with a left lobe graft, which makes anastomosis of the hepatic vein sterically easy for postoperative venous patency.

Three-dimensional Computed Tomography Evaluation of the Vasculature of Right-side Colon Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: From an oncological perspective, central ligation of the feeding vessel is an important approach to consider when performing colon cancer surgery. This study aimed to use three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) to clarify the vascular anatomy for performing central vascular ligation to improve the accuracy of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) performed to treat advanced right-side colon cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This descriptive study was conducted at one institution and targeted 92 patients with right-side colon cancer whose vascular anatomy was evaluated with 3D-CT before surgery between January 2014 and December 2020 at Tokyo Medical University Hospital. RESULTS: In 49 patients (53.3%), the ileocolic artery was ventral to the superior mesenteric vein (SMV), whereas in 43 patients (46.7%), it was dorsal to the SMV. The right colic artery was present in 31 patients (33.7%). The middle colic artery was present in all patients (100%). A common duct type was present in 80 patients (87.0%). Branching directly from the superior mesenteric artery without a common duct was observed in 12 patients (13.0%). Twenty-one patients (22.9%) had an accessory superior mesenteric artery. CONCLUSION: The vascular structure of the right-side colon is highly complex. Conducting 3D-CT evaluations of the vessel anatomy is very useful for surgeons who conduct MIS, and is considered to enable central ligation to be performed safely and improve the quality of surgery, which will benefit patients.

Superior mesenteric vein/portal vein contact in preoperative imaging indicates biological malignancy in anatomically resectable pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer in contact with the superior mesenteric vein/portal vein is classified as resectable pancreatic cancer; however, the biological malignancy and treatment strategy have not been clarified. METHODS: Data from 186 patients who underwent pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer were evaluated using a prospectively maintained database. The patients were classified as having resectable tumors without superior mesenteric vein/portal vein contact and with superior mesenteric vein/portal vein contact of ≤180°. Disease-free survival, overall survival, and prognostic factors were analyzed. RESULTS: In the univariate analysis, superior mesenteric vein/portal vein contact in resectable pancreatic cancer was a significant prognostic index for disease-free survival and overall survival. In the multivariate analysis for poor disease-free survival, the superior mesenteric vein/portal vein contact remained significant (hazard ratio = 2.13, 95% confidence interval: 1.29-3.51; p < 0.01). In the multivariate analysis, superior mesenteric vein/portal vein contact was a significant independent prognostic index for overall survival (hazard ratio = 2.17, 95% confidence interval: 1.27-3.70; p < 0.01), along with sex, tumor differentiation, nodal involvement, and adjuvant chemotherapy. Portal vein resection for superior mesenteric vein/portal vein contact did not improve the overall survival (p = 0.86). CONCLUSIONS: Superior mesenteric vein/portal vein contact in resectable pancreatic cancer was found to be an independent predictor of disease-free survival and overall survival after elective resection. Thus, pancreatic cancer in contact with the superior mesenteric vein/portal vein may be considered as borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.

Portal Vein or Superior Mesenteric Vein Thrombosis with Dose-Escalated Radiation for Borderline or Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.

PURPOSE: Portal vein and superior mesenteric vein thrombosis (PVT/SMVT) are potentially morbid complications of radiation dose-escalated local therapy for pancreatic cancer. We retrospectively reviewed records for patients treated with and without intraoperative radiation (IORT) to identify risk factors for PVT/SMVT. METHODS: Ninety-six patients with locally advanced or borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma received neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgical exploration from 2009 to 2014. Patients at risk for close or positive surgical margins received IORT boost to a biologically effective dose (BED10) > 100. Prognostic factors for PVT/SMVT were evaluated using competing risks regression. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 79 months for surviving patients. Fifty-six patients (58%) received IORT. Twenty-nine patients (30%) developed PVT/SMVT at a median time of 18 months. On univariate competing risks regression, operative blood loss and venous repair with a vascular interposition graft, but not IORT dose escalation or diabetes history, were significantly associated with PVT/SMVT. The development of thrombosis in the absence of recurrence was significantly associated with a longstanding diabetes history, post-neoadjuvant treatment CA19-9, and operative blood loss. All 4 patients who underwent both IORT and vascular repair with a graft developed PVT/SMVT. PVT/SMVT in the absence of recurrence is not associated with significantly worsened overall survival but led to frequent medical interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 30% of patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiation for PDAC developed PVT/SMVT a median of 18 months following surgery. This was significantly associated with venous reconstruction with vascular grafts, but not with escalating radiation dose. PVT/SMVT in the absence of recurrence was associated with significant morbidity.

Variations of the double superior mesenteric vein are not rare: An observational study using computed tomography, three-dimensional image reconstruction, and surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Few studies have evaluated variations of the main trunk of the superior mesenteric vessels. Particularly, the double superior mesenteric vein (DSMV) has not been described in detail. This study aimed to establish the definition, anatomical characteristics, and underlying clinical significance of the DSMV. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 115 patients with colorectal cancer were included in this retrospective study between March 2020 and March 2022. The anatomical characteristics were analyzed using computed tomography, three-dimensional image reconstructions, and surgical videos. RESULTS: Among the patients enrolled, 22 (19.1%) had DSMVs. The median diameters of the right and left superior mesenteric veins were similar. The superior mesenteric artery was sandwiched between the right and the left superior mesenteric veins. The left superior mesenteric vein mainly crossed the ventral side of the superior mesenteric artery (63.6%). In 1 case, the right superior mesenteric vein was mistakenly resected intraoperatively. The DSMV was classified into types I and II based on whether the right and left trunks formed a common trunk; it was further classified into subtypes a and b based on the colonic vein confluence. The proportions of type I-a, I-b, II-a, and II-b were 4.5%, 27.3%, 9.1%, and 59.1%, respectively. The middle colic veins drained into the left superior mesenteric vein in 19 cases (86.4%). CONCLUSIONS: The DSMV is more common than previously thought. For the first time, the definition and four types of the DSMV were proposed. The presence of a DSMV should be considered during right hemicolectomies.

Successful Treatment of Recurrent Colonic Adenocarcinoma with Metastatic Tumor Thrombus in the Superior Mesenteric Vein with Surgical Excision and Venous Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND Patients cured of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) are at increased risk of second malignancies, such as lung, breast, and colon cancer. Isolated metastasis of these malignancies to the vasculature is rare. We present a unique case of a patient cured of HL who developed colon cancer and later presented with an isolated metastases of colon cancer to the superior mesenteric vein. The patient is now in complete remission 5 years after surgical excision of the superior mesenteric vein metastases followed by chemotherapy. CASE REPORT A 56-year-old woman presented with a past medical history notable for stage III HL diagnosed at age 13 years that was treated by splenectomy, chemotherapy, and mantle with inverted Y radiation. She underwent a right nephrectomy at age 51 years for renal cell carcinoma. At age 56, an 8-cm mass in the transverse colon was found during surveillance imaging. She underwent right hemicolectomy for pathological stage IIA (T3N0M0) adenocarcinoma. A liver adenoma was identified a year later. Two years after hemicolectomy, an abdominal recurrence was identified, and she underwent a resection of a superior mesenteric vein mass with porto-mesenteric reconstruction. Pathology revealed metastatic colonic adenocarcinoma, 1 of 7 lymph nodes positive for cancer, and clear margins. She received 6 months of fluorouracil chemotherapy and remained free of recurrences for 5 years. CONCLUSIONS Isolated vascular recurrences of colon cancer can be cured with resection and systemic chemotherapy. Diagnosis and treatment of venous recurrences remains challenging owing to the lack or percutaneous access for biopsy and the difficulty of venous reconstruction.

Idiopathic myointimal hyperplasia of the mesenteric veins: A systematic review of surgical management.

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic myointimal hyperplasia of the mesenteric veins is an extremely rare non-thrombotic mesenteric veno-occlusive disease. The management of idiopathic myointimal hyperplasia of the mesenteric veins is not well-established, and although surgery is the mainstay of treatment, the optimal operation remains unclear. Therefore, we aimed to perform a systematic review to assess the various surgical procedures and associated outcomes for patients with idiopathic myointimal hyperplasia of the mesenteric veins. METHODS: A systematic search for articles published from 1946 to April 2022 in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cinahl, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases is reported. In addition, we report 4 cases of idiopathic myointimal hyperplasia of the mesenteric veins managed at our institution until March 2023. RESULTS: A total of 53 studies and 88 patients with idiopathic myointimal hyperplasia of the mesenteric veins were included. Most (82%) were male patients, with a mean age of 56.6 years old. The majority (99%) of patients required surgery. Most reports described the involvement of the rectum and sigmoid colon (81%). The most common surgical procedures were Hartmann's procedure (24%) and segmental colectomy (19%); completion proctectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis was performed in 3 (3.4%) cases. In 6 (6.8%) cases, idiopathic myointimal hyperplasia of the mesenteric veins was suspected preoperatively and managed with elective surgery. Four (4.5%) complications were reported. Nearly all (99%) patients achieved remission with surgical intervention. CONCLUSION: Idiopathic myointimal hyperplasia of the mesenteric veins is a rare pathologic entity infrequently suspected preoperatively and typically diagnosed after surgical resection. Surgical resection with Hartmann's procedure or segmental colectomy was most commonly performed, with completion proctectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis reserved for cases of extensive rectal involvement. Surgical resection was safe and effective, with a low risk of complications and recurrence. Surgical decision-making should be based on the extent of the disease at the time of presentation.

Internal hernia after laparoscopic sigmoidectomy with splenic flexural mobilization and high ligation of the inferior mesenteric vein: A case report.

Several studies have recently reported the rare occurrence of internal herniation of the small bowel after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Most cases of internal herniation after laparoscopic colorectal surgery occur due to a mesenteric defect. However, there have been no reports on the indications for closing mesenteric defects to prevent the development of an internal hernia. This study reports a case of an internal hernia of the proximal jejunum near the ligament of Treitz in a patient who underwent laparoscopic sigmoidectomy with splenic flexural mobilization and high ligation of the inferior mesenteric vein. Assessing the risk for internal herniation before completing the initial surgery is crucial. Additionally, mesenteric defect closure should be performed to prevent the development of internal hernias among patients with a potential risk.

Technical Outcomes of Porto-Mesenteric Venous Reconstruction in Pancreatic Resection Using Autologous Left Renal Vein Graft as Conduit.

BACKGROUND: Portal or superior mesenteric vein (PV-SMV) resection and reconstruction is sometimes required during pancreatic tumor resection. In patients requiring segmental venous resection with interposition grafting, the left renal vein (LRV) is an accessible autologous solution. However, long-term patency outcomes of the LRV as an interposition conduit in this setting have not been analyzed. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing pancreatic resection with PV-SMV reconstruction using LRV between 2002 and 2022. The primary outcome was PV-SMV patency at last follow-up, assessed with postoperative CT scans and analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival methods that account for variation in follow-up duration. Development of any postoperative acute kidney injury within 7 days of surgery and morbidity were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: The study cohort includes 65 patients who underwent LRV harvest; 60 (92%) ultimately underwent successful reconstruction with harvested LRV graft. Kaplan-Meier 2-year estimated patency rate of the LRV graft was 88%, with no cases of complete occlusion. Six (10%) patients experienced graft stenosis. Nine of 61 (15%) patients experienced grade II or III acute kidney injury, 6 of 9 returning to normal renal function before discharge. No difference in median serum creatinine was observed at baseline, 6 and 12 months from surgery. LRV remnant thrombosis was seen in 7 of 65 (11%) patients. Only 3 of 61 (5%) patients had persistent acute kidney injury caused by complications unrelated to LRV harvesting. CONCLUSIONS: Autologous LRV graft was a reliable conduit for segmental PV-SMV reconstruction, resulting in a high patency rate and marginal impact on renal function. LRV harvest is a safe and potentially ideal surgical option for PV-SMV reconstruction in pancreatic surgery.