Myocardial structural and functional changes in cardiac amyloidosis: insights from a prospective observational patient registry.

AIMS: The pathophysiological hallmark of cardiac amyloidosis (CA) is the deposition of amyloid within the myocardium. Consequently, extracellular volume (ECV) of affected patients increases. However, studies on ECV progression over time are lacking. We aimed to investigate the progression of ECV and its prognostic impact in CA patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Serial cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) examinations, including ECV quantification, were performed in consecutive CA patients. Between 2012 and 2021, 103 CA patients underwent baseline and follow-up CMR, including ECV quantification. Median ECVs at baseline of the total (n = 103), transthyretin [(ATTR) n = 80], and [light chain (AL) n = 23] CA cohorts were 48.0%, 49.0%, and 42.6%, respectively. During a median period of 12 months, ECV increased significantly in all cohorts [change (Δ) +3.5% interquartile range (IQR): -1.9 to +6.9, P < 0.001; Δ +3.5%, IQR: -2.0 to +6.7, P < 0.001; and Δ +3.5%, IQR: -1.6 to +9.1, P = 0.026]. Separate analyses for treatment-naïve (n = 21) and treated (n = 59) ATTR patients revealed that the median change of ECV from baseline to follow-up was significantly higher among untreated patients (+5.7% vs. +2.3%, P = 0.004). Survival analyses demonstrated that median change of ECV was a predictor of outcome [total: hazard ratio (HR): 1.095, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.047-1.0145, P < 0.001; ATTR: HR: 1.073, 95% CI: 1.015-1.134, P = 0.013; and AL: HR: 1.131, 95% CI: 1.041-1.228, P = 0.003]. CONCLUSION: The present study supports the use of serial ECV quantification in CA patients, as change of ECV was a predictor of outcome and could provide information in the evaluation of amyloid-specific treatments.

Cardiac amyloidosis: a significant blind spot of the H2FPEF score.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) often mimics heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Due to very different treatment strategies, an exact diagnosis and differentiation between pure HFpEF and CA-related heart failure (HF) is important. In the present study, we assessed the recently published H2FPEF score in patients with pure HFpEF, transthyretin (ATTR), as well as light chain (AL) amyloidosis-related HFpEF and tested whether it differentiates between these entities. METHODS: The H2FPEF scores consists of easy-to-assess clinical (Body Mass Index, number of hypertensive drugs, presence of atrial fibrillation, age) and echocardiographic (systolic pulmonary arterial pressure, E/E´) parameters. It can be computed in a categorical way resulting in scores between 0 and 9 points (0-1: HFpEF rule out, 2-5: further testing required, 6-9: HFpEF rule in), or in a continual way providing an exact percentage of a patient's HFpEF probability. Continuous and categorical variables were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney-U, and χ2-tests. Diagnostic accuracy was computed from 2x2 tables. Survival analysis was performed with Kaplan-Meier curves. A P value of <0.05 was set as the level of significance. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients with pure HFpEF, 53 patients with ATTR, and 34 patients with AL CA were included in the present study. Median age (HFpEF: 71.5 years; ATTR CA: 77.0 years; AL CA: 60.0 years; P<0.001), gender distribution (HFpEF [female]: 73.0%, ATTR (female): 18.9%, AL [female]: 38.2%; P<0.001), and N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (HFpEF: 1045pg/mL; ATTR CA: 1927pg/mL; AL CA: 4308pg/mL; P<0.001) differed significantly between study cohorts. Median H2FPEF scores were highest among HFpEF (categorical: 5.0 points; continual: 95.1%), followed by ATTR (categorical: 4.0 points; continual: 89.0%), and AL CA (categorical: 3.0 points; continual: 31.2%). Respective P values were <0.001. Low H2FPEF scores (0-1 points) were found among patients in the AL CA cohort (29.4%), but not among HFpEF or ATTR CA patients (P<0.001). The majority of patients, irrespective of disease entity were in the intermediate score range (2-5 points, HFpEF: 80.0% ATTR CA: 94.3%, AL CA: 67.9%; P=0.006). High scores (6-9 points) were most often found among HFpEF patients (20.0%), followed by ATTR CA (5.7%) and AL CA (2.9%), (P=0.007). CONCLUSIONS: The H2FPEF score should be used with caution, as there is a significant overlap between HFpEF and CA-related HF.

Impact of Tafamidis and Optimal Background Treatment on Physical Performance in Patients With Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: In patients with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy, tafamidis was shown to slow the decline in 6-minute walking distance as compared with placebo. We aimed to define the impact of tafamidis and optimal background treatment on functional capacity as determined by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). METHODS: Seventy-eight consecutive patients were enrolled in the study. They underwent CPET at baseline, and outcome defined as death or heart failure hospitalization was obtained for a time period of up to 30 months. Fifty-four patients completed a follow-up CPET at 9±3 months (range, 4-16 months). Improvement in peak VO2 at follow-up was defined as ∆peak VO2≥1.0 mL/(kg·min), stable peak VO2 was defined as 0≤∆peak VO2<1.0 mL/(kg·min), and decline in peak VO2 was defined by ∆peak VO2<0 mL/(kg·min). RESULTS: Baseline peak VO2>14 mL/(kg·min) as well as minute ventilation/carbon dioxide production slope≤34 were associated with a lower risk of death or heart failure hospitalization (P=0.002, P=0.007, respectively). In 54 patients, who received tafamidis and underwent repeat CPET testing, an improvement in physical performance (P=0.002) was observed at follow-up. When comparing pre and post-treatment parameters, 29 patients (54%) showed an increase in percent predicted peak VO2 (P<0.0001), an improvement of peak VO2 (P<0.0001), and better physical performance at follow-up (P<0.0001). Patients with stable or improved peak VO2 had less advanced heart disease at baseline (P=0.046). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that baseline peak VO2 and baseline minute ventilation/carbon dioxide production slope predict outcomes and an improvement in physical performance as measured by CPET was observed in patients receiving tafamidis, who had less advanced disease at baseline, emphasizing the importance of early diagnosis.

The utility and complications of plasma administration in cirrhotic patients undergoing minimally invasive procedures.

Patients with cirrhosis have coagulopathy often necessitating correction with blood products, such as plasma products (fresh frozen plasma and plasma frozen within 24 h) prior to certain invasive procedures. However, plasma administration has the potential for substantial negative adverse effects such as volume overload, transfusion-related lung injury and allergic/anaphylactic reactions. In addition, its effectiveness in preventing bleeding is similarly unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of plasma administration in cirrhotic patients undergoing minimally invasive procedures, specifically vascular access placement, transjugular liver biopsies, renal biopsies and thoracenteses. In this retrospective cohort study, we identified patients receiving plasma products in preparation for an invasive procedure, with the primary outcomes of volume overload and bleeding. Of the 145 transfusion events that met the criteria from 2015 to 2018, the median INR decreased from 2.7 to 2.2 pre and post plasma administration and 13.8% of recipients had complications of volume overload. The cost of acquisition of plasma administered below clinically impactful doses accumulates to an estimated 19 000 dollars over this time period, not including nursing preparation or production costs. Plasma products minimally, if at all, improved laboratory values of coagulation and in some patients led to adverse effects.