Determinants of survival following heart transplantation in adults with congenital heart disease.

BACKGROUND: Adult patients surviving with congenital heart disease (ACHD) is growing. We examine the factors associated with heart transplant outcomes in this challenging population with complex anatomy requiring redo-surgeries. METHODS: We reviewed the United Network for Organ Sharing-Standard Transplant Analysis and Research database and analyzed 35,952 heart transplants from January 1st, 2000, to September 30th, 2018. We compared transplant characteristics for ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) (n = 14,236), nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) (n = 20,676), and ACHD (n = 1040). Mean follow-up was 6.20 ± 4.84 years. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox-proportional hazards analysis were used to analyze survival data. RESULTS: Multivariable analysis confirmed that ACHD was associated greater in-hospital death compared to ICM (HR = 0.54, P < 0.001) and NICM (HR = 0.46, P < 0.001). Notable factors associated with increased mortality were history of cerebrovascular disease (HR = 1.11, P = 0.026), prior history of malignancy (HR = 1.12, P = 0.006), pre-transplant biventricular support (HR = 1.12, P = 0.069), postoperative stroke (HR = 1.47, P < 0.001) and postoperative dialysis (HR = 1.71, P < 0.001). ACHD transplants had a longer donor heart ischemic time (P < 0.001) and trend towards more deaths from primary graft dysfunction (P = 0.07). In-hospital deaths were more likely with ACHD and use of mechanical support such as use of right ventricular assist device (HR = 2.20, P = 0.049), biventricular support (HR = 1.62, P < 0.001) and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (HR = 2.36, P < 0.001). Conditional survival after censoring hospital deaths was significantly higher in ACHD (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Heart transplant in ACHD is associated with a higher post-operative mortality given anatomical complexity but a better long-term conditional survival. Normothermic donor heart perfusion may improve outcomes in the ACHD population by reducing the impact of longer ischemic times.

Translation of immunomodulatory therapy to treat chronic heart failure: Preclinical studies to first in human.

BACKGROUND: Inflammation has been associated with progression and complications of chronic heart failure (HF) but no effective therapy has yet been identified to treat this dysregulated immunologic state. The selective cytopheretic device (SCD) provides extracorporeal autologous cell processing to lessen the burden of inflammatory activity of circulating leukocytes of the innate immunologic system. AIM: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of the SCD as an extracorporeal immunomodulatory device on the immune dysregulated state of HF. HF. METHODS AND RESULTS: SCD treatment in a canine model of systolic HF or HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) diminished leukocyte inflammatory activity and enhanced cardiac performance as measured by left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction and stroke volume (SV) up to 4 weeks after treatment initiation. Translation of these observations in first in human, proof of concept clinical study was evaluated in a patient with severe HFrEFHFrEF ineligible for cardiac transplantation or LV LV assist device (LVAD) due to renal insufficiency and right ventricular dysfunction. Six hour SCD treatments over 6 consecutive days resulted in selective removal of inflammatory neutrophils and monocytes and reduction in key plasma cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α),), interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, and monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1. These immunologic changes were associated with significant improvements in cardiac power output, right ventricular stroke work index, cardiac index and LVSV index…. Stabilization of renal function with progressive volume removal permitted successful LVAD implantation. CONCLUSION: This translational research study demonstrates a promising immunomodulatory approach to improve cardiac performance in HFrEFHFrEF and supports the important role of inflammation in the progression of HFHF.

Association of Days Alive and Out of the Hospital After Ventricular Assist Device Implantation With Adverse Events and Quality of Life.

Importance: There is a need to better assess the cumulative effect on morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. This study evaluates a patient-centered performance metric (days alive and out of hospital [DAOH]) for durable LVAD therapy. Objective: To determine the incidence of percent of DAOH before and after LVAD implantation and (2) explore its association with established quality metrics (death, adverse events [AEs], quality of life). Design, Settings, and Participants: This was a retrospective national cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries implanted with a durable continuous-flow LVAD between April 2012 and December 2016. The data were analyzed from December 2021 to May 2022. Follow-up was 100% complete at 1 year. Data from The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Intermacs registry were linked to Medicare claims. Main Outcomes and Measures: The number of DAOH 180 days before and 365 days after LVAD implantation and daily patient location (home, index hospital, nonindex hospital, skilled nursing facility, rehabilitation center, hospice) were calculated. Percent of DAOH was indexed to each beneficiary's pre- (percent DAOH-BF) and postimplantation (percentage of DAOH-AF) follow-up time. The cohort was stratified by terciles of percentage of DAOH-AF. Results: Among the 3387 patients included (median [IQR] age: 66.3 [57.9-70.9] years), 80.9% were male, 33.6% and 37.1% were Interfaces Patient Profile 2 and 3, respectively, and 61.1% received implants as destination therapy. Median (IQR) percent of DAOH-BF was 88.8% (82.7%-93.8%) and 84.6% (62.1-91.5%) for percent of DAOH-AF. While DAOH-BF was not associated with post-LVAD outcomes, patients in the low tercile of percentage of DAOH-AF had a longer index hospitalization stay (mean, 44 days; 95% CI, 16-77), were less likely to be discharged home (mean. -46.4 days; 95% CI, 44.2-49.1), and spent more time in a skilled nursing facility (mean, 27 days; 95% CI, 24-29), rehabilitation center (mean, 10 days; 95% CI, 8-12), or hospice (mean, 6 days; 95% CI, 4-8). Increasing percentage of DAOH-AF was associated with patient risk, AEs, and indices of HRQoL. Patients experiencing non-LVAD-related AEs had the lowest percentage of DAOH-AF. Conclusions and Relevance: Significant variability existed in the percentage of DAOH within a 1-year time horizon and was associated with the cumulative AEs burden. This patient-centered measure may assist clinicians in informing patients about expectations after durable LVAD implantation. Validation of percentage DAOH as a quality metric for LVAD therapy across centers should be explored.

Mortality following durable left ventricular assist device implantation by timing and type of first infection.

OBJECTIVE: Although infections are common after left ventricular assist device implantation, the relationship between timing and type of first infection with regard to mortality is less well understood. METHODS: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support patients receiving a primary left ventricular assist device from April 2012 to May 2017 were included. The primary exposure was defined 3 ways: any infection, timing of first infection (early: ≤90 days; intermediate: 91-180 days; late: >180 days), and type (ventricular assist device specific, ventricular assist device related, non-ventricular assist device). The association between first infection and all-cause mortality was estimated using Cox regression. RESULTS: The cohort included 12,957 patients at 166 centers (destination therapy: 47.4%, bridge-to-transplant: 41.2%). First infections were most often non-ventricular assist device (54.2%). Rates of first infection were highest in the early interval (10.7/100 person-months). Patients with any infection had a significantly higher adjusted hazard of death (hazard ratio, 2.63; 2.46-2.86). First infection in the intermediate interval was associated with the largest increase in adjusted hazard of death (hazard ratio, 3.26; 2.82-3.78), followed by late (hazard ratio, 3.13; 2.77-3.53) and early intervals (hazard ratio, 2.37; 2.16-2.60). Ventricular assist device-related infections were associated with the largest increase in hazard of death (hazard ratio, 3.02; 2.69-3.40), followed by ventricular assist device specific (hazard ratio, 2.92; 2.57-3.32) and non-ventricular assist device (hazard ratio, 2.42; 2.20-2.65). CONCLUSIONS: Relative to those without infection, patients with any postimplantation infection had an increased risk of death. Ventricular assist device-related infections and infections occurring in the intermediate interval were associated with the largest increase in risk of death. After left ventricular assist device implantation, infection prevention strategies should target non-ventricular assist device infections in the first 90 days, then shift to surveillance/prevention of driveline infections after 90 days.

Failure to rescue: A candidate quality metric for durable left ventricular assist device implantation.

OBJECTIVE: Failure to rescue (FTR), defined as death after a complication, is recognized as a principal driver of variation in mortality among hospitals. We evaluated FTR as a quality metric in patients who received durable left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) using the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support. METHODS: Data on 13,617 patients who received primary durable LVADs from April 2012 to October 2017 at 131 hospitals that performed at least 20 implants were analyzed from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support. Rates of major complications and FTR were compared across risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality terciles (low, medium, high) and hospital volume. Logistic regression was used to estimate expected FTR rates on the basis of patient factors for each major complication. RESULTS: The overall unadjusted in-hospital mortality rate was 6.96%. Risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality rates varied 3.1-fold across terciles (low, 3.3%; high, 10.3%; P trend <.001). Rates of major complications varied 1.1-fold (low, 34.0%; high, 38.8%; P < .0001). Among patients with a major complication, 854 died in-hospital for an FTR rate of 17.7%, with 2.8-fold variation across mortality terciles (low, 8.5%; high, 23.9%; P < .0001). FTR rates were highest for renal dysfunction requiring dialysis (45.3%) and stroke (36.5%). Higher average annual LVAD volume was associated with higher rates of major complications (<10 per year, 26.7%; 10-20 per year, 34.0%; 20-30 per year, 34.0%; >30 per year, 40.1%; P trend <.0001) whereas hospitals implanting <10 per year had the highest FTR rate (<10 per year, 23.5%; 10-20 per year, 16.5%; 20-30 per year, 17.0%; >30 per year, 17.9%; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: FTR might serve as an important quality metric for durable LVAD implant procedures, and identifying strategies for successful rescue after complications might reduce hospital variations in mortality.

Mitral regurgitation severity at left ventricular assist device implantation is associated with distinct myocardial transcriptomic signatures.

OBJECTIVES: We examined for differences in pre-left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation myocardial transcriptome signatures among patients with different degrees of mitral regurgitation (MR). METHODS: Between January 2018 and October 2019, we collected left ventricular (LV) cores during durable LVAD implantation (n = 72). A retrospective chart review was performed. Total RNA was isolated from LV cores and used to construct cDNA sequence libraries. The libraries were sequenced with the NovaSeq system, and data were quantified using Kallisto. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) and Gene Ontology analyses were performed, with a false discovery rate <0.05 considered significant. RESULTS: Comparing patients with preoperative mild or less MR (n = 30) and those with moderate-severe MR (n = 42), the moderate-severe MR group weighted less (P = .004) and had more tricuspid valve repairs (P = .043), without differences in demographics or comorbidities. We then compared both groups with a group of human donor hearts without heart failure (n = 8). Compared with the donor hearts, there were 3985 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) for mild or less MR and 4587 DEGs for moderate-severe MR. Specifically altered genes included 448 DEGs for specific for mild or less MR and 1050 DEGs for moderate-severe MR. On GSEA, common regulated genes showed increased immune gene expression and reduced expression of contraction and energetic genes. Of the 1050 genes specific for moderate-severe MR, there were additional up-regulated genes related to inflammation and reduced expression of genes related to cellular proliferation. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing durable LVAD implantation with moderate-severe MR had increased activation of genes related to inflammation and reduction of cellular proliferation genes. This may have important implications for myocardial recovery.

Determining optimal donor heart ischemic times in adult cardiac transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: Unsupervised statistical determination of optimal allograft ischemic time (IT) on heart transplant outcomes among ABO donor heart types. METHODS: We identified 36,145 heart transplants (2000-2018) from the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Continuous and categorical variables were analyzed with parametric and nonparametric testing. Determination of IT cutoffs for survival analysis was performed using Contal and O'Quigley univariable method and Vito Muggeo multivariable segmented modeling. RESULTS: Univariable and multivariable IT threshold determination revealed a cutoff at about 3 h. The hourly increase in survival risk with ≥3 h IT is asymmetrically experienced at the early 90 days (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.29, p < .001) and up to 1-year time point (HR = 1.16, p < .001). Beyond 1 year the risk of prolonged IT is less impactful (HR = 1.04, p = .022). Longer IT was associated with more postoperative complications such as stroke (2.7% vs. 2.3, p = .042), dialysis (11.6% vs. 9.1%, p < .001) and death from primary graft dysfunction (1.8% vs. 1.2%, p < .001). O blood type donor hearts with IT ≥ 3 h has significantly increased hourly mortality risk at 90 days (HR = 1.27, p < .001), 90 days to 1 year (HR = 1.22, p < .001) and >1 year (HR = 1.05, p = .041). For non-O blood types with ≥3 h IT hourly mortality risk was increased at 90 days (HR = 1.33, p < .001), but not at 90 days to 1 year (HR = 1.09, p = .146) nor ≥1 year (HR = 1.08, p = .237). CONCLUSIONS: The donor heart IT threshold for survival determined from unbiased statistical modeling occurs at 3 h. With longer preservation times, transplantation with O donor hearts was associated with worse survival.

Advancing Quality Metrics for Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device Implant: Analysis of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Intermacs Database.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation are at risk for death and postoperative adverse outcomes. Interhospital variability and concordance of quality metrics were assessed using the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (Intermacs). METHODS: A total of 22 173 patients underwent primary, durable LVAD implantation across 160 hospitals from 2012 to 2020, excluding hospitals performing <10 implant procedures. Observed and risk-adjusted operative mortality rates were calculated for each hospital. Outcomes included operative and 90-day mortality, a composite of adverse events (operative mortality, bleeding, stroke, device malfunction, renal dysfunction, respiratory failure), and secondarily failure to rescue. Rates are presented as median (interquartile range [IQR]). Hospital performance was evaluated using observed-to-expected (O/E) ratios for mortality and the composite outcome. RESULTS: Interhospital variability existed in observed (median, 7.2% [IQR, 5.1%-9.6%]) mortality. The rates of adverse events varied across hospitals: major bleeding, 15.6% (IQR, 11.4%-22.4%); stroke, 3.1% (IQR, 1.6%-4.7%); device malfunction, 2.4% (IQR, 0.8%-3.7%); respiratory failure, 10.5% (IQR, 4.6%-15.7%); and renal dysfunction, 6.4% (IQR, 3.2%-9.6%). The O/E ratio for operative mortality varied from 0.0 to 6.1, whereas the O/E ratio for the composite outcome varied from 0.28 to 1.99. Hospital operative mortality O/E ratios were more closely correlated with the 90-day mortality O/E ratio (r = 0.74) than with the composite O/E ratio (r = 0.12). CONCLUSIONS: This study reported substantial interhospital variability in performance for hospitals implanting durable LVADs. These findings support the need to (1) report hospital-level performance (mortality, composite) and (2) undertake benchmarking activities to reduce unwarranted variability in outcomes.

Preoperative clinical diagnostic accuracy of heart failure among patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery: a single-centre prospective observational analysis.

Background: Reliable diagnosis of heart failure during preoperative evaluation is important for perioperative management and long-term care. We aimed to quantify preoperative heart failure diagnostic accuracy and explore characteristics of patients with heart failure misdiagnoses. Methods: We performed an observational cohort study of adults undergoing major noncardiac surgery at an academic hospital between 2015 and 2019. A preoperative clinical diagnosis of heart failure was defined using keywords from the history and clinical examination or administrative documentation. Across stratified subsamples of cases with and without clinically diagnosed heart failure, health records were intensively reviewed by an expert panel to develop an adjudicated heart failure reference standard using diagnostic criteria congruent with consensus guidelines. We calculated agreement among experts, and analysed performance of clinically diagnosed heart failure compared with the adjudicated reference standard. Results: Across 40 555 major noncardiac procedures, a stratified subsample of 511 patients was reviewed by the expert panel. The prevalence of heart failure was 9.1% based on clinically diagnosed compared with 13.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.3-16.2%) estimated by the expert panel. Overall agreement and inter-rater reliability (kappa) among heart failure experts were 95% and 0.79, respectively. Based upon expert adjudication, heart failure was clinically diagnosed with an accuracy of 92.8% (90.6-95.1%), sensitivity 57.4% (53.1-61.7%), specificity 98.3% (97.1-99.4%), positive predictive value 83.5% (80.3-86.8%), and negative predictive value 93.8% (91.7-95.9%). Conclusions: Limitations exist to the preoperative clinical diagnosis of heart failure, with nearly half of cases undiagnosed preoperatively. Considering the risks of undiagnosed heart failure, efforts to improve preoperative heart failure diagnoses are warranted.

Generalizability of Trial Data to Real-World Practice: An Analysis of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Intermacs Database.

BACKGROUND: Although the current wide-scale adoption of the HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist device can be attributed to favorable clinical trial outcomes, restrictive clinical trial eligibility criteria may result in lack of generalizability to real-world populations. We assessed the generalizability of left ventricular assist device clinical trial outcomes and evaluated the prognostic value of specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. METHODS: The Multicenter Study of MagLev Technology in Patients Undergoing Mechanical Circulatory Therapy With HeartMate 3 (MOMENTUM 3) eligibility criteria were applied to patients identified in The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (Intermacs) who underwent HeartMate 3 implantation (n = 4610) between August 2017 and March 2020. Patients were categorized as trial-eligible or trial-ineligible and by number of ineligibility criteria. The effect of trial eligibility on mortality was estimated using Cox models. RESULTS: Indications for HeartMate 3 implant included destination therapy (n = 2827, 61%), bridge to candidacy (n = 969, 21%), and bridge to transplant (n = 702, 15%). A total of 1941 recipients (42%) were trial-ineligible, with 1245 (27%) meeting one ineligibility criterion, 470 (10%) meeting two, and 226 (5%) meeting three or more. Estimated 1-year mortality for trial-ineligible recipients was higher than for trial-eligible recipients (17% ± 1% vs 10% ± 1%, P < .001). Compared with trial-eligible patients, 1-year mortality was incrementally higher for patients meeting one ineligibility criterion (15% ± 1%), two criteria (16% ± 2%), and three or more criteria (30% ± 3%). Thrombocytopenia and elevated creatinine, bilirubin, and international normalized ratio in trial-ineligible patients were independently associated with increased mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Despite differences in mortality, both trial-eligible and trial-ineligible HeartMate 3 recipients had excellent outcomes in real-world practice, suggesting future trial eligibility criteria could be expanded.

Impact of donor blood type on outcomes after prolonged allograft ischemic times.

OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to determine the influence of allograft ischemic time on heart transplant outcomes among ABO donor organ types given limited prior reports of its survival impact. METHODS: We identified 32,454 heart transplants (2000-2016) from the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Continuous and categoric variables were analyzed by parametric and nonparametric testing. Survival was determined using log-rank or Cox regression tests. Propensity matching adjusted for preoperative variables. RESULTS: By comparing allograft ischemic time less than 4 hours (n = 6579) with 4 hours or more (n = 25,875), the hazard ratios for death at 15 years after prolonged ischemic time (≥4 hours) for blood types O, A, B, and AB were 1.106 (P < .001), 1.062 (P < .001), 1.059 (P = .062), and 1.114 (P = .221), respectively. Unadjusted data demonstrated higher mortality for transplantation of O versus non-O donor hearts for ischemic time 4 hours or more (hazard ratio, 1.164; P < .001). After propensity matching, O donor hearts continued to have worse survival if preserved for 4 hours or more (hazard ratio, 1.137, P = .008), but not if ischemic time was less than 4 hours (hazard ratio, 1.042, P = .113). In a matched group with 4 hours or more of ischemic time, patients receiving O donor organs were more likely to experience death from primary graft dysfunction (2.5% vs 1.7%, P = .052) and chronic allograft rejection (1.9% vs 1.1%, P = .021). No difference in death from primary graft dysfunction or chronic allograft rejection was seen with less than 4 hours of ischemic time (P > .150). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with non-O donor hearts, transplantation with O donor hearts with ischemic time 4 hours or more leads to worse survival, with higher rates of primary graft dysfunction and chronic rejection. Caution should be practiced when considering donor hearts with the O blood type when anticipating extended cold ischemic times.

Risk factors for heart transplant survival with greater than 5 h of donor heart ischemic time.

OBJECTIVE: Implantation of donor hearts with prolonged ischemic times is associated with worse survival. We sought to identify risk factors that modulate the effects of prolonged preservation. METHODS: Retrospective review of the United Network for Organ Sharing database (2000-2018) to identify transplants with >5 (n = 1526) or ≤5 h (n = 35,733) of donor heart preservation. In transplanted hearts preserved for >5 h, Cox-proportional hazards identify modifiers for survival. RESULTS: Compared to ≤5 h, transplanted patients with >5 h of preservation spent less time in status 1B (76 ± 160 vs. 85 ± 173 days, p = .027), more commonly had ischemic cardiomyopathy (42.3% vs. 38.3%, p = .002), and less commonly received a blood type O heart (45.4% vs. 50.8%, p < .001). Longer heart preservation time was associated with a higher incidence of postoperative stroke (4.5% vs. 2.5%, p < .001), and dialysis (16.4% vs. 10.6%, p < .001). Prolonged preservation was associated with a greater likelihood of death from primary graft dysfunction (2.8% vs. 1.5%, p < .001) but there was no difference in death from acute (2.0% vs. 1.7%, p = .402) or chronic rejection (2.0% vs. 1.9%, p = .618). In transplanted patients with >5 h of heart preservation, multivariable analysis identified greater mortality with ischemic cardiomyopathy etiology (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.36, p < 0.01), pre-transplant dialysis (HR = 1.84, p < .01), pre-transplant extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO, HR = 2.36, p = .09), and O blood type donor hearts (HR = 1.35, p < .01). CONCLUSION: Preservation time >5 h is associated with worse survival. This mortality risk is further amplified by preoperative dialysis and ECMO, ischemic cardiomyopathy etiology, and use of O blood type donor hearts.

Fate of preoperative moderate mitral regurgitation following left ventricular assist device implantation.

OBJECTIVE: We examined for improvements in preoperative moderate mitral regurgitation following continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (cfLVAD) implantation. METHODS: From 2006 to 2020, 190 patients with moderate MR underwent cfVLAD implant without concomitant mitral valve (MV) surgery. Cardiac dimensions and contractility, as well as valve function, were assessed with an echocardiogram (echo) pre-cfLVAD, and at approximately 1 month post-cfLVAD. Outcomes were determined by retrospective chart review. RESULTS: Median echo follow-up was 0.94 (0.53, 1.38) months. Residual significant moderate or greater MR was present in 30/190 (15.8%) on follow-up. Patients with significant residual MR had larger preoperative left ventricular internal diameters in diastole (74.4 ± 8.7 vs. 71.1.0 ± 9.1 mm, p = .034). Significant residual MR was associated with higher preoperative mean pulmonary artery pressures (OR = 1.055, p = .035) and pulmonary capillary wedge pressures (OR = 1.060, p = .034). Significant residual MR on echo was not associated with any survival difference (p = .325). The 1, 5, and 10 year survival were 89.9%, 55.2%, and 34.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with moderate MR undergoing LVAD implantation, the likelihood of significant residual MR is low and mitral intervention in this population is not recommended. However, select patients with larger preoperative left heart dimensions and pulmonary vascular pressures may be at risk for persistent residual MR.

Durable mechanical circulatory support device use in the United States by geographic region and minority status.

BACKGROUND: Durable mechanical circulatory support device (MCSD) therapy has experienced rapid dissemination in the United States. Few studies have evaluated geographic patterns of its dissemination based upon patient characteristics that could identify potential variation in its application. METHODS: A combined Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support and Medicare dataset identified durable MCSD implants from 2008 through 2014. MCSD implant rates were estimated using yearly US Census population data, estimated from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research database and stratified by age, race, and United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) region. RESULTS: Overall, 16,331 patients received an MCSD implant from 232 unique centers. Annual MCSD implant rate (per 1 million population) significantly increased in each UNOS region (absolute range of increase, 5.3-16.4) with UNOS Region 7 demonstrating the highest overall absolute rate (20.9) in 2014 and UNOS Region 11 demonstrating the greatest relative increase in rate (430.5%). Geographical differences in the rate of MCSD implants were observed among whites and minorities with higher rates of MCSD implants observed for minorities for nearly all UNOS regions across all years. Significantly greater relative increases in MCSD implants for minorities compared with whites were observed within UNOS Regions 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 11 (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Geographical differences exist in rates of MCSD implantation among whites and minorities. The reasons for these differences are unknown, but may reflect underlying differences in disease burden or disparities in access to heart transplantation and warrant further study.

Utility of routine evaluations for rejection in patients greater than 2 years after heart transplantation.

AIMS: Guidelines support routine surveillance testing for rejection for at least 5 years after heart transplant (HT). In patients greater than 2 years post-HT, we examined which clinical characteristics predict continuation of routine surveillance studies, outcomes following discontinuation of routine surveillance, and the cost-effectiveness of different surveillance strategies. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively identified subjects older than 18 who underwent a first HT at our centre from 2007 to 2016 and who survived ≥760 days (n = 217) post-HT. The clinical context surrounding all endomyocardial biopsies (EMBs) and gene expression profiles (GEPs) was reviewed to determine if studies were performed routinely or were triggered by a change in clinical status. Subjects were categorized as following a test-based surveillance (n = 159) or a signs/symptoms surveillance (n = 53) strategy based on treating cardiologist intent to continue routine studies after the second post-transplant year. A Markov model was constructed to compare two test-based surveillance strategies to a baseline strategy of discontinuing routine studies. One thousand twenty studies were performed; 835 were routine. Significant rejection was absent in 99.0% of routine EMBs and 99.8% of routine GEPs. The treating cardiologist's practice duration, patient age, and immunosuppressive regimen predicted surveillance strategy. There were no differences in outcomes between groups. Routine surveillance EMBs cost more and were marginally less effective than a strategy of discontinuing routine studies after 2 years; surveillance GEPs had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $1.67 million/quality-adjusted life-year. CONCLUSIONS: Acute asymptomatic rejection is rare after the second post-transplant year. Obtaining surveillance studies beyond the second post-transplant year is not cost-effective.

Early Detection of Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction Using Perioperative Data Among Noncardiac Surgical Patients: A Machine-Learning Approach.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is a condition imposing significant health care burden. Given its syndromic nature and often insidious onset, the diagnosis may not be made until clinical manifestations prompt further evaluation. Detecting HFrEF in precursor stages could allow for early initiation of treatments to modify disease progression. Granular data collected during the perioperative period may represent an underutilized method for improving the diagnosis of HFrEF. We hypothesized that patients ultimately diagnosed with HFrEF following surgery can be identified via machine-learning approaches using pre- and intraoperative data. METHODS: Perioperative data were reviewed from adult patients undergoing general anesthesia for major surgical procedures at an academic quaternary care center between 2010 and 2016. Patients with known HFrEF, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, preoperative critical illness, or undergoing cardiac, cardiology, or electrophysiologic procedures were excluded. Patients were classified as healthy controls or undiagnosed HFrEF. Undiagnosed HFrEF was defined as lacking a HFrEF diagnosis preoperatively but establishing a diagnosis within 730 days postoperatively. Undiagnosed HFrEF patients were adjudicated by expert clinician review, excluding cases for which HFrEF was secondary to a perioperative triggering event, or any event not associated with HFrEF natural disease progression. Machine-learning models, including L1 regularized logistic regression, random forest, and extreme gradient boosting were developed to detect undiagnosed HFrEF, using perioperative data including 628 preoperative and 1195 intraoperative features. Training/validation and test datasets were used with parameter tuning. Test set model performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), positive predictive value, and other standard metrics. RESULTS: Among 67,697 cases analyzed, 279 (0.41%) patients had undiagnosed HFrEF. The AUROC for the logistic regression model was 0.869 (95% confidence interval, 0.829-0.911), 0.872 (0.836-0.909) for the random forest model, and 0.873 (0.833-0.913) for the extreme gradient boosting model. The corresponding positive predictive values were 1.69% (1.06%-2.32%), 1.42% (0.85%-1.98%), and 1.78% (1.15%-2.40%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Machine-learning models leveraging perioperative data can detect undiagnosed HFrEF with good performance. However, the low prevalence of the disease results in a low positive predictive value, and for clinically meaningful sensitivity thresholds to be actionable, confirmatory testing with high specificity (eg, echocardiography or cardiac biomarkers) would be required following model detection. Future studies are necessary to externally validate algorithm performance at additional centers and explore the feasibility of embedding algorithms into the perioperative electronic health record for clinician use in real time.

Aortic Valve Repair Versus Replacement Associated With Durable Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

BACKGROUND: Aortic valve (AV) repair (AVr) using a central coaptation stitch or bioprosthetic AV replacement (AVR) are most commonly performed at the time of durable left ventricular assist device implant to address AV insufficiency (AI). METHODS: Prospective data collection on 46 patients undergoing left ventricular assist device implant from 2007 through 2018 who received concomitant AVr (n = 40) or AVR (n = 6) was retrospectively analyzed to assess freedom from recurrent aortic insufficiency. Paired Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare echocardiographic findings. Mantel-Cox statistics were used to analyze survival. RESULTS: For AVr, central coaptation led to a mean decrease in AI severity by 2.1 ± 1.0 grades (P < .001). Three patients (7.5%) had recurrence of at least moderate AI by 3 years. In comparison, all patients in the AVR group had mild or less AI on subsequent follow-up. Success of AVr in downgrading AI severity was associated with a smaller aortic root diameter (P = .011) and sinotubular junction diameter (P = .003). An aortic root diameter greater than 3.5 cm was predictive of less improvement in AI severity compared with 3.5 cm or less (1.83 ± 1.03 versus 2.47 ± 0.80 grades of improvement; P = .038). Duration of cardiopulmonary bypass was 32 minutes longer and duration of aortic cross-clamp was 38 minutes longer for AVR versus AVr cohorts. No difference in 30-day (P = .418) or overall survival (P = .572) between the AVr and AVR groups was seen. CONCLUSIONS: Aortic valve repair for addressing AI has a recurrence rate of 7.5% at 3 years. Success in downgrading AI is more likely with a smaller aortic root. No difference in survival was observed between AVr and AVR.

Histidine-Tryptophan-Ketoglutarate Solution for Donor Heart Preservation Is Safe for Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Various solutions are used for donor heart preservation. We examined the outcomes in our heart transplant population where histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) solution has been used for heart preservation since 2004. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database (2004-2016) comparing our heart transplant outcomes with other national centers. Propensity matching in a 1:3 ratio was performed to adjust for preoperative recipient variables. RESULTS: After propensity matching comparing UNOS outcomes (n = 1080) with our institutional data (n = 360), there was no difference in matched preoperative variables. Donor hearts were similar for donor age, sex, donor-to-recipient size ratio, LVEF, and ischemic time. Our HTK cohort had a larger proportion with donor cardiac arrest (26.3% vs 6.1%, P < .001) and longer cardiac arrest duration (22.1 ± 16.0 vs 17.2 ± 14.0 minutes, P = .052). Our primary graft dysfunction (PGD) rate requiring mechanical support was 4.2% (n = 1). Postoperative mechanical support use for PGD included extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in 9 (60.0%), intraaortic balloon pump in 4 (26.7%), right ventricular assist device in 3 (20%), and biventricular assist device in 3 (20%). Overall survival at our institution was similar to the national average (P = .649). Survival at 1, 5, and 10 years with HTK was 92.2%, 81.3%, and 70.8%, and for the UNOS population was 91.6%, 80.3%, and 62.0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Use of HTK solution for donor hearts was associated with a low rate of severe PGD. Overall survival was not significantly different from other institutions using a variety of preservation solutions in the UNOS database during the same period. HTK solution is efficacious for preservation of donor hearts.

Safety of regadenoson positron emission tomography stress testing in orthotopic heart transplant patients.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the safety of regadenoson (REG) stress testing in patients who have undergone orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT). BACKGROUND: Routine screening for cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is necessary after OHT. Adenosine stress is contraindicated after heart transplantation due to supersensitivity in denervated hearts. Safety of regadenoson stress following OHT has not been well studied. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data from OHT patients (N = 123) who were referred to REG stress testing. Medical records were reviewed to determine hemodynamic and ECG response to regadenoson and to identify adverse reactions. RESULTS: No serious adverse events occurred. No life-threatening arrhythmias or hemodynamic changes occurred. Common side-effects related to regadenoson were observed, dyspnea being the most frequent (66.7%). On average the heart rate rose from 82.8 ± 12 to 95.7 ± 13.4 bpm (P < 0.001), systolic blood pressure decreased from 138.7 ± 20.9 to 115.9 ± 23.9 mmHg (P < 0.001) and mean arterial pressure decreased from 103.5 ± 14.1 to 84.72 ± 15.90 mmHg (P < 0.001) during stress protocol. There was no sustained ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, or second-or third-degree atrioventricular block. CONCLUSION: Regadenoson stress testing appears to be well tolerated and safe in OHT patients.