Predictors of Early Continence After Single-port Transvesical Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the factors associated with a short time of return to continence. METHODS: We analyzed the first 110 SP TV RARP consecutive cases performed by one surgeon from 2020 to 2022. Continence was defined as zero to one safety pad. Two statistical analyses were done. First, patients were divided: group A (n = 62) included individuals who achieved continence within the initial week postcatheter removal; group B (n = 48) rest of the patients. Descriptive statistics were compared, followed by logistic regression for independent variables. Second, time to continence was analyzed as a continuous variable employing linear regression. The primary outcomes were the independent variables significantly associated with a short time to continence. RESULTS: All cases were completed successfully, without additional ports or conversions. Median urinary catheter duration and time to continence were 3 and 3.5days, respectively. Patients achieving continence within 1week significantly presented with fewer preoperative urinary tract symptoms, lower prostate-specific antigen levels, and had smaller specimen weights postoperatively. Multivariable logistic regression established low specimen weight as the sole significant factor (P = .04). Furthermore, linear regression demonstrated that alterations in independent variables accounted for 12.7% of the variance in time to continence (P = .62). CONCLUSION: The regionalization of surgery to the bladder employing a retropubic space-sparing extraperitoneal approach during SP TV RARP contributes to a fast return to continence. According to our model, the factors that significantly predict a shorter time to continence include lower preoperative International Prostate Symptom Score, prostate-specific antigen, and postoperative specimen weight.

Single-port Transvesical Robot-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy: Surgical Technique and Clinical Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Surgical management of large prostatic adenomas can be performed via open, endoscopic, or robotic approaches. A low-profile single-port (SP) robot was built to work in confined areas (ie, the bladder) and regionalize surgery. OBJECTIVE: To describe the novel SP transvesical (TV) robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) and report clinical outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: SP TV RASP cases were performed in an academic hospital by two surgeons from 2019 to 2023. A total of 117 cases were performed, and data from patients with at least 12 mo of follow-up were analyzed. The inclusion criterion was severe obstructive urinary symptoms or catheter-dependent urinary retention due to large prostates with volume >80 ml. SURGICAL PROCEDURE: The procedure consisted of two main steps through a single 3-cm suprapubic incision: first, enucleation of the adenoma, and second, a 360° bladder mucosal flap reconstruction. No drains or continuous bladder irrigation was used routinely. MEASUREMENTS: Intraoperative parameters, pre- and postoperative uroflowmetry, and 1-yr clinical outcomes were assessed. We used descriptive statistics to analyze the data. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: All procedures were completed successfully without additional ports or conversions. The median console time and estimated blood loss were 107 min and 100 ml, respectively. Transfusion rate was 0%. Intraoperative complications included two suspected air emboli attributed to high insufflation pressures. There were no major postoperative complications. In total, 95.8% were discharged within the first 24 h, with a median length of stay and pain score of 5 h and 3/10, respectively. There was persistent improvement in the median International Prostate Symptom Score and flow rate after 1 yr. The median Sexual Score Inventory for Men score was 20 at 12 mo. Our study is limited by its retrospective nature and cohort size. CONCLUSIONS: SP TV RASP is a feasible alternative for the management of severe benign prostatic hyperplasia that promotes fast recovery and demonstrates 1-yr improvement in urinary function. PATIENT SUMMARY: Single-port transvesical robot-assisted simple prostatectomy is a minimally invasive alternative for the treatment of large benign prostatic growth. A single robotic arm goes through a small incision in the skin and bladder to extract the obstructive prostatic tissue. Afterward, reconstruction of the area is done to decrease bleeding and improve postoperative symptoms. We found that patients recover quickly and have excellent clinical results with a low risk of complications.

Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate vs Transvesical Single-port Robotic Simple Prostatectomy for Large Prostatic Glands.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the perioperative outcomes of transvesical single-port robotic simple prostatectomy (SP-RASP) and holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of patients undergoing SP-RASP and HoLEP from 2019 to 2022 with preoperative prostatic volume (PPV) >80 cm3. Percent of prostate adenoma removed (%PAR) was estimated by specimen weight normalized by PPV. Univariate analysis was performed using chi-square, Fisher exact, and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. A subgroup analysis with 1:1 matching for PPV was also performed. RESULTS: A total of 50 SP-RASP and 90 HoLEP cases were analyzed. The median (interquartile range) PPV was 169 (128-244)cm3 for SP-RASP and 129 (100-150)cm3 for HoLEP, (P < .01). The median (interquartile range) %PAR was 57(44-68) for SP-RASP vs 51(42-62) for HoLEP (P = .10). Overall, 11(12%) HoLEP and 5(10%) SP-RASP patients experienced complications (P = .51). Same-day discharge occurred in 24(48%) SP-RASP vs 7(8%) HoLEP patients (P < .01). Median foley catheter duration was longer in SP-RASP (6 vs 1 day, P < .01) and trial of void was successful at first attempt in >94% (P = .68). Transient de novo incontinence was reported in 24(28%) HoLEP vs 2(5%) SP-RASP (P < .01). No differences in voiding parameters were observed at latest follow up. Subgroup postmatched analysis revealed analogous findings. CONCLUSION: SP-RASP and HoLEP have similar favorable perioperative outcomes for management of large prostatic adenomas. SP-RASP may be considered in patients unwilling to accept the risk of transient incontinence and in those with unfavorable urethral access, large bladder stone burden, or diverticula.

Single Port Versus Multiport Robot-assisted Simple Prostatectomy: A Multi-institutional Study From the Single-port Advanced Research Consortium (SPARC).

OBJECTIVE: To compare robot-assisted simple prostatectomy intraoperative and postoperative.ßoutcomes between single-port (SP) and multiport (MP) robotic systems in a multi-institutional setting. METHODS: We analyzed all-consecutive robot-assisted simple prostatectomy cases done in 5 centers from January 2017 to October 2022. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics and compared with appropriate tests depending on the type of variable and distribution. Statistical significance was considered when P.ß<.05. RESULTS: A total of 405 cases were analyzed:.ß249 and 156 were MP and SP, respectively. Operative times were similar between groups (P.ß=.ß.62). Estimated blood loss during surgery was significantly lower with the SP robot (P.ß<.001). Postoperatively, the SP approach required a significantly shorter hospital stay, less use of opioids, and a shorter duration of Foley catheter (P.ß<.001). There was no significant difference between the post-operative Clavien-Dindo ...3 complication rate (P.ß=.ß.30). The 30-day readmission rate of MP (10.8%) was significantly higher than for SP (0%) (P.ß<.001). De novo urge incontinence was more common in the MP group (P.ß=.ß.02). CONCLUSION: The SP robotic approach to simple prostatectomy is advantageous when it comes to postoperative comfort for patients. Specifically, it requires a shorter hospital stay, less use of opioids, and a shorter Foley catheter duration.

Single-port transvesical versus open simple prostatectomy: a perioperative comparative study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the initial perioperative outcomes of single-port transvesical simple prostatectomy (SP RASP) patients to those of open simple prostatectomy (OSP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Perioperative data from 42 consecutive patients with BPH who underwent SP RASP were prospectively reviewed. Similarly, data from forty-three consecutive patients who underwent the standard OSP, were retrospectively collected. Through direct suprapubic bladder access, prostatic enucleation was performed using the prostatic capsule as a landmark. Then a complete vesicourethral mucosal advancement flap was accomplished. OSP was performed according to the standard approach. Demographics, Intra- and perioperative data were analyzed and assessed with a descriptive analysis. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups, except for the preoperative median post-void residual volume, which was higher in the OSP group (p = 0.004). The SP RASP group had less intraoperative estimated blood loss (p < 0.001), no need for continuous bladder irrigation (p < 0.001), and less in-hospital opioid use (p < 0.001). Patients in the SP RASP group were discharged on postoperative day zero, compared to a median of 2 days for OSP (p < 0.001). The median Foley catheter duration was 7 days for SP RASP, compared to a median of 10 days for OSP (p < 0.001). SP RASP group had fewer postoperative complications, however, this did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: SP RASP is an alternative approach in treating surgical BPH. It may offer patients less morbidity in comparison to OSP.

Single-port Extraperitoneal and Transperitoneal Radical Prostatectomy: A Multi-Institutional Propensity-Score Matched Study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the perioperative and early postoperative outcomes between single-port (SP) extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (EPRP) and SP transperitoneal radical prostatectomy (TPRP), in a multi-institutional setting. METHODS: We identified all patients who underwent SP robot-assisted radical prostatectomy at 6 different institutes. Data of 650 patients were collected and divided into 2 groups based on the surgical approach: SP EPRP or SP TPRP. A Propensity-score matched-pair analysis for body mass index (BMI), prostate size, and National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk was performed with a 1:1 ratio. Analysis of perioperative and postoperative outcomes was performed using Wilcoxon signed-rank test and chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: After matching, 238 patients were included in each arm. The median follow-up period was 7 and 6 months for EPRP and TPRP groups, respectively. The total operative time was longer in the EPRP group (206 vs 155 minutes, P < .001). The EPRP group had a shorter length of hospitalization and same-day discharge rate compared to the TPRP approach (P < .001). There was no difference in the overall intraoperative or postoperative complications rate between the 2 groups, nor positive surgical margin rates. CONCLUSION: The SP extraperitoneal approach is associated with a shorter hospital stay and higher rate of same-day discharge, with no difference in the surgical margin, or complication rates.

Transvesical versus extraperitoneal single-port robotic radical prostatectomy: a matched-pair analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare our initial perioperative and postoperative outcomes of the single-port (SP) transvesical radical prostatectomy (TVRP) approach with the single-port extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (ERP) approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Initial consecutive seventy-eight patients underwent SP TVRP between December 2020 and October 2021. Patients with extensive previous abdominal surgeries, or low- to intermediate-risk prostate cancer were selected. Data of consecutive 169 patients treated with SP ERP between February 2019 and November 2020, were used for comparison. Optimal matched-paired analysis of PSA value, biopsy Gleason score, and prostate volume was performed. Preoperative, perioperative, and early functional outcomes were included in the analysis. The median follow-up was 7 months and 9 months for TVRP and ERP groups respectively. RESULTS: The median total operative time was longer in the TVRP compared to the ERP group (p = .002). There were no differences in intraoperative complications or surgical margin status. TVRP group had less rate of grade 3a Clavien-Dindo complications (p = .026). The Foley catheter duration was 3 (3, 4) days in the TVRP group compared to 7 (7, 8) days in the ERP group (p < .001). There was a consistently improved continence rate in the TVRP group at 6 weeks (72% TVRP, 48% ERP, p = .004), 3 months (97% TVRP, 81% ERP, p = .008), and 6 months postoperatively (100% TVRP, 93% ERP, p = .047). There was no difference in biochemical recurrence at 6 months of follow-up. CONCLUSION: In our initial series, TVRP allows for a faster continence recovery, without other functional or oncological compromises.

Redo Robotic Partial Nephrectomy for Recurrent Renal Tumors: A Multi-Institutional Analysis.

Introduction: As the experience with robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) grows, the indications have expanded to incorporate previously operated ipsilateral kidneys with recurrent renal masses. We sought to analyze the outcomes of redo RAPN in patients with a recurrent renal mass. Methods: Using a multi-institutional series, the data of 72 patients who underwent RAPN for a recurrent renal mass between 2010 and 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with familial renal cell carcinoma and multiple renal tumors were excluded. Major complication was defined by Clavien grade ≥3. The median follow-up was 28.5 months. Baseline demographics, clinical and tumor characteristics, and perioperative and postoperative outcomes are reported. Results: Our cohort consisted of a combination of previous thermal ablation (19.6%), laparoscopic (19.6%), open (26.1%), and robotic (34.8%) partial nephrectomy. The median R.E.N.A.L. score was 8. Twenty percent had hilar tumors and 9.7% had a solitary kidney. RAPN was completed in all cases. Two cases (2.8%) were converted to open surgery. None of the cases were converted to radical nephrectomy intraoperatively. One patient underwent radical nephrectomy postoperatively because of bleeding. Transfusion rate was 5.9% and major complication rate was 8.3%. Median length of stay was 3 days. Estimated glomerular filtration rate preservation was 78.7% at discharge and 90.8% at 1-year follow-up. Positive surgical margin rate was 8.3%. Overall, distant recurrence was seen in 11 patients (15.3%), however, only 1 patient had local progression (1.4%). Conclusion: In experienced hands, RAPN is an effective approach to treat select cases of locally recurrent renal masses with promising perioperative and functional outcomes. Patients should be carefully monitored for distant recurrence.

Long-term comparative outcomes of partial nephrectomy and cryoablation in patients with solitary kidneys: a single-center analysis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with solitary kidneys are amenable to postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) after PN. We compared the functional and oncological outcomes of cryoablation (CA) and PN in patients with a solitary kidney and a cT1a renal mass. METHODS: From a single-institution series, we analyzed 74 patients (31 PN, 43 CA) with a solitary kidney who underwent treatment for a cT1a renal mass. The functional outcomes were AKI and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) preservation. Oncological outcomes were recurrence and death. Linear mixed-effects and logistic regression models were used for functional outcomes analysis, whereas oncological outcomes were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 63.9 months. PN group had lower median age (59 years vs. 68, P<0.001) and larger median tumor size (2.80 cm vs. 2.0, p =0.003). AKI was more common in the PN group on postoperative day 1 (58% vs. 2.8%, P<0.001). However, only one patient in the PN group required temporary dialysis in the perioperative period. eGFR preservation was similar at postoperative 3 months (89% vs. 90%, P=0.083), or 12 months (85% vs. 94%, P=0.2) follow-up. CA group had higher recurrence rate (29% vs. 3.2%, P=0.005), and worse recurrence-free survival (P=0.027). Overall survival (OS) was comparable (P=0.31). CONCLUSIONS: In a solitary kidney setting, CA is associated with a lower risk of AKI at postoperative day 1 compared to PN. Functional outcome is comparable upon longer follow-up. The local recurrence rates are significantly higher in the CA group with no significant difference in OS.

A Transition Toward a Faster Recovery in Single-Port Transvesical Simple Prostatectomy.

Objectives: To present the updated technique and evaluate the perioperative and postoperative outcomes of single-port transvesical simple prostatectomy (SP TVSP) Patients and Methods: Forty-two consecutive patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia indicated for surgery underwent SP TVSP in a single institution. Through direct suprapubic bladder access, the SP robot was docked. Prostatic enucleation was performed using the prostatic capsule as a landmark. Then a complete vesicourethral mucosal advancement flap was accomplished. Demographics, perioperative, and postoperative data were prospectively collected. Mean follow-up period was 12 months. Results: All procedures were effectively performed with no conversion, additional port placement, or intraoperative complication. The median prostatic volume was 170 cc. Ninety-five percent of the patients did not require opioids analgesia after discharge. Excluding planned admissions, 92% (21/23 patients) were discharged after a median (interquartile range) of 4.6 (4.1-5.7) hours after surgery. The median Foley catheter duration for all cohort was 7 days, and decreased to 3 days after technique adjustment for the last 19 consecutive patients. The median international prostate symptom score decreased from 23 before surgery to 2.5 after surgery. All patients had a significant postoperative improvement in maximum flow rate with a 200% improvement over baseline (19 vs 6.5 mL/sec). Conclusion: In our initial series, SP TVSP allows for favorable perioperative and early postoperative outcomes including low complication same-day discharge, short Foley catheter stay, minimal opioids use, and quick recovery.

The Multi-Institutional Experience in Single-Port Robotic Transvesical Simple Prostatectomy for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Management.

PURPOSE: Single-port (SP) robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) through the transvesical approach is a novel surgical option in the management of large prostatic glands. We present the first multi-institutional study to further assess the perioperative and postoperative outcomes of SP RASP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From February 2019 to November 2021, 91 consecutive patients of 3 separate institutions underwent transvesical RASP using the da Vinci® SP robotic surgical system. Surgeries were performed by 3 experienced surgeons. Through a suprapubic incision and transvesical access, the SP robot is docked directly into the bladder, and the prostatic enucleation is performed. Prospective data collection, including baseline characteristics, perioperative and postoperative outcomes, was performed. The mean followup period was 4.6 months. RESULTS: The mean (SD) prostate volume was 156 (62) ml. The mean (SD) total operative time was 159 (45) minutes, and the median (IQR) estimated blood loss was 100 (50, 200) cc. The median (IQR) postoperative hospital stay was 21.0 (6.5, 26.0) hours; however, 42% of all patients were discharged the same day. The median (IQR) Foley catheter duration was 5 (5, 7) days. Only 3 patients (3%) developed Clavien grade 2 postoperative complications. At 9-month followup, the median (IQR) International Prostate Symptom Score and quality of life score were 4 (2, 5) and 0 (0, 1), respectively, with a mean (SD) maximum flow rate and post-void residual of 21 (17) ml/second and 40 (55) ml, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In a multi-institutional setting, the SP RASP promotes a pain-free procedure, same-day discharge, short Foley catheter duration, low complication rate and quick recovery.

Robotic partial nephrectomy for management of renal mass in patients with a solitary kidney: can we expand the indication to T2 and T3 disease?

BACKGROUND: Management of complex renal masses is challenging in a solitary kidney setting. We retrospectively compared oncological and renal functional outcomes between robotic and open partial nephrectomy (PN) in patients with a pT2-pT3 renal mass and a solitary kidney. METHODS: From a multi-institutional series, we identified 20 robotic partial nephrectomies (RPN) and 15 open partial nephrectomies (OPN) patients confirmed to have a pT2 or pT3 renal cancer. Surgeries were performed between January 2012 and July 2019. Patients with familial renal cell carcinoma, prior ipsilateral PN, or multiple ipsilateral synchronous tumors were excluded from the analysis. Baseline characteristics, perioperative and postoperative outcomes were compared using χ2 test, Fisher's Exact Test, Mann-Whitney U Test, and Student's t-test. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were comparable. Cold ischemia was utilized more in the open group (92.9% vs. 15.8%, P<0.001). OPN group had a longer ischemia time (48.9 min vs. 27.3 min, P<0.001), a higher major complication rate (38.5% vs. 11.1%, P=0.009), and a higher length of stay was (5 vs. 3.5 days, P=0.023). Positive surgical margin rate was comparable (20% OPN vs. 15% RPN; P=1.000). At a mean follow up of 21 months local recurrence rates (1 OPN vs. 2 RPN, P=1.000) were comparable, chronic kidney disease upstaging rate (46.7% OPN vs. 45.0% RPN, P=0.922) and estimated glomerular filtration rate preservation at one year (75.2%% in OPN vs. 79.1% RPN, P=0.707) were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: In select cases and experienced hands, the robotic approach offers a reasonable alternative to open surgery in patients with pT2 and pT3 tumors and a solitary kidney.

Single Port Transvesical Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: Initial Clinical Experience and Description of Technique.

OBJECTIVE: To describe our surgical technique and early results for the single port (SP) transvesical robotic radical prostatectomy using the da Vinci SP surgical system. PATIENTS & METHODS: Twenty patients underwent SP radical prostatectomy through a transvesical approach. Through a 3 cm suprapubic incision, the bladder was incised and a GelPOINT mini system was used for floating docking. Through the gel port, the dedicated SP robotic port, a 12 mm assistant port, and a flexible suction tubing were introduced. RESULTS: All cases were completed successfully without need for extra ports or conversion. No intraoperative complications were recorded. Median (IQR) total robotic time was 119 (99-127) minutes. Median (IQR) estimated blood loss was 135 (100-162) mL. Median (IQR) hospital length of stay was 4.4 (3.9-22.2) hours. None of the patients required opioids use after discharge. Median (IQR) time with a Foley catheter after surgery was 4 (4-6) days and 75% of the patients had immediate continence within 48 hours after Foley catheter removal. 85% were totally continent within 10 days after catheter removal. Three patients (15%) had positive surgical margins (all focal) on pathology. Two patients had transvesical lymph node dissection with 4 and 15 lymph nodes negative on final pathology. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated the feasibility of SP robotic transvesical radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection using a dedicated SP robotic platform. Favorable perioperative outcomes were seen, along with low complication rate, same day discharge, elimination of opioid requirement, and high rate of immediate recovery of continence as well as a low positive margin rate.

Initial Experience with Single-port Robotic-assisted Kidney Transplantation and Autotransplantation.

BACKGROUND: Compared with the standard open approach, multiport robotic-assisted kidney transplantation (RAKT) has emerged as a less morbid alternative. The use of a single-port robotic approach for kidney transplantation (KT) is presented in this study as having the potential for further reducing the morbidity of KT. OBJECTIVE: To present the technique and evaluate perioperative and short-term (≤1 yr) postoperative outcomes of single-port RAKT. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective evaluation of peri- and postoperative outcomes in patients who underwent allograft KT (n = 6) or kidney autotransplantation (n = 3). The IDEAL model (www.ideal-collaboration.net/framework) for safe surgical innovation was used. SURGICAL PROCEDURE: Kidney allografts from living or deceased donors were transplanted into six patients with end-stage renal disease. Single-port robotic surgery was performed through a 5-cm midline periumbilical abdominal incision with transperitoneal or extraperitoneal approaches. With similar incision and technique, the right or left kidney was removed and autotransplantation was performed in three patients. MEASUREMENTS: Intra- and postoperative variables, and outcomes were assessed with a descriptive analysis. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Single-port RAKT procedures were completed successfully, with total operative and vascular anastomosis times ranging from 300 to 450 mins and from 52 to 92 mins, respectively. All six patients had excellent graft function with serum creatinine levels at the last follow-up (2 wk to 1 yr), ranging from 1.2 to 1.5 mg/dl. Renal autotransplantation was also completed successfully with a single-port robotic approach in three patients. The total operative and vascular anastomosis times ranged from 510 to 600 mins and from 65 to 83 mins, respectively. In all three cases, serum creatinine levels remained normal after the surgery and during follow-up, and all remained symptom-free at the time of this writing (4-8 mo after their surgeries). CONCLUSIONS: In this initial experience, single-port RAKT is feasible with potential benefits such as offering true single-site minimally invasive surgery, extraperitoneal approach, less morbidity, and comparable short-term graft functional outcomes. PATIENT SUMMARY: We presented the initial experience with the application of single-port robotic surgery for kidney transplantation and autotransplantation. This technique was found to be safe and effective, with promising postoperative outcomes and potentially with less morbidity.