Immunoglobulin A Deposits In Renal Allografts: A Prospective Longitudinal Single-Center Study.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: To describe the prevalence of IgA deposits (IgAD) in renal allografts in a cohort of renal transplant recipients and to analyze their management strategies and histopathology. To assess graft function and proteinuria after 1 year of follow-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective longitudinal follow-up study was carried out in VPS Lakeshore Hospital and Research Centre, Kochi, Kerala, over a period of 5 years (July 2015 to June 2020). Kidney transplant recipients with allograft biopsies that reported IgAD on immunofluorescence were included in the study. Light microscopy and immunofluorescence studies were performed. Mesangial hypercellularity (M); segmental glomerulosclerosis (S); endocapillary hypercellularity (E); tubular atrophy/interstitial fibrosis (T); crescents (C) (MEST-C) Scoring was done in patients with pathogenic IgAD. Treatment strategies included increased baseline steroid dosage, rituximab administration, and plasma exchange. Clinical details and management strategies were analyzed, and patients were followed up for 1 year after diagnosis. Changes in graft function (S. Creatinine) and proteinuria (Urine Protein/Creatinine ratio) were analyzed. Clinico-pathologic correlation with the MEST-C scores was also done. RESULTS: Out of 1036 kidney transplants done in the study period, 760 graft biopsies were performed. Sixty-four cases had post-transplant deposition of IgA (8%). The mean age was 45 ± 11.25SD years. The study had 51 men and 13 women. Induction immunosuppression comprised rabbit antithymocyte globulin in 29 (45%) patients and basiliximab in 35 (54%). Maintenance immunosuppression in all comprised tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids. There were 2 groups: group A (pathogenic IgAD) and group B (incidental IgAD). Group A had 46 cases (71.9%), out of which 8 had "active" IgA nephropathy (endocapillary proliferation, crescents, and IgA vasculitis), and 38 had "inactive" IgAD. In patients with active deposits, 3 had cellular crescents (18%, 30%, and 23%), all 8 had endocapillary proliferation, and 2 had vasculitis. Group B had 18 cases (28.1%), comprising T cell-mediated rejections (5), antibody-mediated rejection (8), BK virus nephropathy (1), and interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (4). In group A, 22 (47.8%) presented with graft dysfunction, 8 (17.3%) with isolated proteinuria, and 14 (30.4%) patients presented with a combination. Two (4.3%) patients had neither. Fourteen (30.4%) patients presented within 1 month of renal transplant. In patients of group A, at the end of 1 year of treatment, the mean S. Creatinine reduced to 1.68 mg/dL from 1.84 mg/dL, and the mean protein/creatinine ratio reduced from 1.2 to 0.5 (±1.17). In patients with "active IgA" lesions, at the end of 1 year of treatment, the mean S. Creatinine increased slightly to 1.68 mg/dL (±0.47SD) from 1.48 mg/dL (±0.52SD), and the mean protein/creatinine ratio reduced from 2.32 (±1.56SD) to 1.05 (±1.70SD). In the 16 patients with IgAD and proteinuria, at the end of 1 year of treatment, the mean S. Creatinine decreased to 1.41 ± 0.32 SD mg/dL from 1.47±0.37SD mg/dL and the mean protein/creatinine ratio reduced from 1.12 ± 1.31 SD to 0.39±0.75 SD. In the remaining 22 patients with acute tubular injury, at the end of 1 year, the mean S. Creatinine decreased to 1.920.32 SD mg/dL from 2.10.8SD mg/dL, and the mean protein/creatinine ratio reduced from 1.1 ± 1.31 SD to 0.66 ± 1.45 SD. In the MEST-C scoring analysis, all scores were 0 in 20 (43.4%) biopsies, only M1 score in 11 (23.9%) biopsies, only E1 score in 10 biopsies (21.7%), S1 in 13 (28.2%) cases. CONCLUSION: Immunoglobulin A deposits occur commonly after transplant; these may represent recurrence, de novo IgA, or donor-derived IgAD. Although commonly benign, some may cause significant graft dysfunction and graft loss. IgAD can present as varying combinations of graft dysfunction and proteinuria. Active IgA pathologies may occur early in the post-transplant course, may have significant graft dysfunction, and need proactive management. There is a correlation between segmental sclerosis and proteinuria. Evidence for the efficacy of Rituximab, plasma exchange, and prolonged courses of steroids is wanting; however, some benefits are possible. Long-term follow-up is essential.

Management strategies and outcomes in renal transplant recipients recovering from COVID-19: A retrospective, multicentre, cohort study.

Background: There is an enormous knowledge gap on management strategies, clinical outcomes, and follow-up after kidney transplantation (KT) in recipients that have recovered from coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Methods: We conducted a multi-center, retrospective analysis in 23 Indian transplant centres between June 26, 2020 to December 1, 2021 on KT recipients who recovered after COVID-19 infections. We analyzed clinical and biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (AR) incidence and used cox-proportional modeling to estimate multivariate-adjusted hazard ratios (HR) for predictors of AR. We also performed competing risk analysis. Additional outcome measures included graft loss, all-cause mortality, waiting time from a positive real-time polymerase test (RT-PCR) to KT, laboratory parameters, and quality of life in follow-up. Findings: Among 372 KT which included 38(10·21%) ABO-incompatible, 12(3·22%) sensitized, 64(17·20%) coexisting donors with COVID-19 history and 20 (5·37%) recipients with residual radiographic abnormalities, the incidence of AR was 34 (9·1%) with 1(0·26%) death censored graft loss, and 4(1·07%) all-cause mortality over a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 241 (106-350) days. In our cox hazard proportional analysis, absence of oxygen requirement during COVID-19 compared to oxygen need [HR = 0·14(0·03-0·59); p-value = 0·0071], and use of thymoglobulin use compared to other induction strategies [HR = 0·17(0·03-0.95); p-value = 0·044] had a lower risk for AR. Degree of Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) DR mismatch had the highest risk of AR [HR = 10.2(1·74-65·83); p-value = 0·011]. With competing risk analysis, with death as a competing event, HLA DR mismatch, and oxygen requirement continued to be associated with AR. Age, gender, obesity, inflammatory markers, dialysis vintage, steroid use, sensitization and ABO-incompatibility have not been associated with a higher risk of AR. The median duration between COVID-19 real time polymerase test negativity to transplant was 88(40-145) days (overall), and ranged from 88(40-137), 65(42-120), 110(49-190), and 127(64-161) days in World Health Organization ordinal scale ≤ 3, 4, 5, and 6-7, respectively. There was no difference in quality of life, tacrolimus levels, blood counts, and mean serum creatinine assessed in patients with a past COVID-19 infection independent of severity. Interpretation: Our findings support that the outcomes of KT after COVID-19 recovery are excellent with absence of COVID-19 sequelae during follow-up. Additionally, there does not seem to be a need for changes in the induction/immunosuppression regimen based on the severity of COVID-19. Funding: Sanofi.

A Multicenter Cohort Study From India of 75 Kidney Transplants in Recipients Recovered After COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: There is limited current knowledge on feasibility and safety of kidney transplantation in coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) survivors. METHODS: We present a retrospective cohort study of 75 kidney transplants in patients who recovered from polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-confirmed COVID-19 performed across 22 transplant centers in India from July 3, 2020, to January 31, 2021. We detail demographics, clinical manifestations, immunosuppression regimen, laboratory findings, treatment, and outcomes. Patients with a previous diagnosis of COVID-19 were accepted after documenting 2 negative severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 PCR tests, normal chest imaging with complete resolution of symptom for at least 28 d and significant social distancing for 14 d before surgery. RESULTS: Clinical severity in patients ranged from asymptomatic (n = 17, 22.7%), mild (n = 36.48%), moderate (n = 15.20%), and severe (n = 7.9.3%) disease. Median duration between PCR positive to transplant was 60 d (overall) and increased significantly from asymptomatic, mild, moderate, and severe disease (49, 57, 83, 94 d, P 0.019), respectively. All recipients and donors were asymptomatic with normal creatinine after surgery at a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 81 (56-117) d without any complications relating to surgery or COVID-19. Patient and graft survival was 100%, and acute rejection was reported in 6.6%. CONCLUSIONS: Prospective kidney transplant recipients post-COVID-19 can be considered for transplantation after comprehensive donor and recipient screening before surgery using a combination of clinical, radiologic, and laboratory criteria, careful pretransplant evaluation, and individualized risk-benefit analysis. Further large-scale prospective studies with longer follow-up will better clarify our initial findings. To date, this remains the first and the largest study of kidney transplantation in COVID-19 survivors.

Is it Safe to Be Transplanted From Living Donors Who Recovered From COVID-19? Experience of 31 Kidney Transplants in a Multicenter Cohort Study From India.

BACKGROUND: There is lack of data on feasibility and safety of kidney transplants from living donors who recovered from COVID-19. METHODS: Here, we present a retrospective cohort study of 31 kidney transplant recipients (KTR) from living donors who recovered from polymerase chain reaction confirmed COVID-19 across 19 transplant centers in India from July 3, 2020, to December 5, 2020. We detailed demographics, clinical manifestations, immunosuppression regimen, treatment, and outcomes. Donors with a previous diagnosis of COVID-19 were accepted after documenting 2 negative polymerase chain reaction tests with complete symptom resolution for at least 28 days and significant social distancing for 14 days before surgery. RESULTS: COVID-19 clinical severity in donors ranged from completely asymptomatic (71%, n = 22) to mild infection (29%, n = 9). None progressed to moderate or severe stages of the disease in the entire clinical course of home treatment. Patient and graft survival was 100%, respectively, with acute cellular rejection being reported in 6.4% (n = 2) recipient. All recipients and donors were asymptomatic with normal creatinine at median follow-up of 44 days after surgery without any complications relating to surgery and COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: Our data support safety of proceeding with living donation for asymptomatic individuals with comprehensive donor, recipients screening before surgery, using a combination of clinical, radiologic, and laboratory criteria. It could provide new insights into the management of KTR from living donors who have recovered from COVID-19 in India. To the best of our knowledge, this remains the largest cohort of KTR from living donors who recovered from COVID-19.