Financial Hardship Among Patients With Early-Stage Colorectal Cancer.

Importance: The degree of cancer patients' financial hardship is dynamic and can change over time. Objective: To assess longitudinal changes in financial hardship among patients with early-stage colorectal cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this prospective longitudinal cohort study, English-speaking adult patients with a new diagnosis of stage I to III colorectal cancer being treated with curative intent at National Cancer Institute (NCI) Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) practices between May 2018 and July 2020 and who had not started chemotherapy and/or radiation were included. Data analysis was conducted from March to December 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: Patients completed surveys at baseline as well as at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after enrollment. Cost-related care nonadherence and material hardship, as adopted by Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, were measured. Factors associated with financial hardship were assessed using longitudinal multivariable logistic regression models with time interaction. Results: A total of 451 patients completed baseline questions, with 217 (48.1%) completing the 24-month follow-up. Mean (SD) age was 61.0 (12.0) years (210 [46.6%] female; 33 [7.3%] Black, 380 [84.3%] White, and 33 [7.3%] American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, multiracial, or Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander individuals or those who did not report race or who had unknown race). Among 217 patients with data at baseline and 24 months, 19 (8.8%) reported cost-related care nonadherence at baseline vs 20 (9.2%) at 24 months (P = .84), and 125 (57.6%) reported material hardship at baseline vs 76 (35.0%) at 24 months (P < .001). In multivariable analysis, lower financial worry (odds ratio [OR], 0.90; 95% CI, 0.87-0.93), higher education (OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.15-0.77), and older age (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.91-0.98) were associated with lower nonadherence. Receipt of chemotherapy was associated with higher material hardship (OR, 2.68; 95% CI, 1.15-6.29), while lower financial worry was associated with lower material hardship (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.80-0.96). Over 24 months, female sex was associated with lower nonadherence (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.85-0.96), while higher education was associated with higher nonadherence (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.03-1.17). Being employed was associated with lower material hardship (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.78-0.93), while receipt of care at safety-net hospitals was associated with higher hardship (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.01-1.17). Conclusions and Relevance: In patients with early-stage colorectal cancer, material hardship was more common than cost-related cancer care nonadherence and decreased over time, while nonadherence remained unchanged. Early and longitudinal financial screening and referral to intervention are recommended to mitigate financial hardship.

Racial and survival disparities in inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) and non-IBC: a population-based study focused on Native Hawaiians and other Pacific Islanders.

Background: It is well known that race is an independent predictor of breast cancer mortality and advanced stage at diagnosis. Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is the most aggressive type of breast cancer and has distinct clinical and biological features. Previous studies have shown that Blacks have a higher incidence of IBC than Whites. However, the proportion of IBC and the role of race on prognosis in Native Hawaiian and other Pacific Islander (NH/PI) populations with breast cancer are poorly understood. In this study, we aimed to examine the proportion of IBC to non-IBC in NH/PIs and to identify the clinicopathological, biological, and socioeconomic factors associated with the overall survival of NH/PIs compared to other races. Methods: Utilizing a comprehensive cancer registry from the largest hospital in Hawaii, newly diagnosed primary invasive breast cancer patients diagnosed between 2000 and 2018 were identified. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to test the association between race and clinical outcomes. Variables with P-values <0.05 in the univariate analysis and race (variable of interest) were included in a multivariate analysis. Results: The cohort included 3691 patients, 60 of whom had IBC. NH/PI race had the highest proportion of IBC compared to other races (3.44%) but was not found to be an independent poor prognostic factor in IBC (HR 1.17 [95%CI 0.26-5.22]). Conversely, NH/PI race was associated with worse survival outcomes in patients with non-IBC (HR 1.65 [95%CI, 1.14-2.39]) along with other factors such as lack of insurance, underinsured status, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) subtype, age, and advanced clinical stage. Conclusions: The findings of this study highlight that NH/PIs had higher rates of IBC and inferior survival in non-IBC compared to other races but not in IBC. It is essential to disaggregate NH/PI race from Asians in future population-based research studies. Further research is needed to understand the factors contributing to higher rates of IBC and poor survival outcomes in NH/PIs with non-IBC as well as targeted interventions to improve breast cancer outcomes in this population to ultimately help improve survival rates and reduce health inequities in NH/PIs with breast cancer.

Patient-Reported Financial Burden of Treatment for Colon or Rectal Cancer.

Importance: The longitudinal experience of patients is critical to the development of interventions to identify and reduce financial hardship. Objective: To evaluate financial hardship over 12 months in patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer (CRC) undergoing curative-intent therapy. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective, longitudinal cohort study was conducted between May 2018 and July 2020, with time points over 12 months. Participants included patients at National Cance Institute Community Oncology Research Program sites. Eligibility criteria included age at least 18 years, newly diagnosed stage I to III CRC, not started chemotherapy and/or radiation, treated with curative intent, and able to speak English. Data were analyzed from December 2022 through April 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was financial hardship, measured using the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST), which assesses the psychological domain of financial hardship (range, 0-44; higher score indicates better financial well-being). Participants completed 30-minute surveys (online or paper) at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months. Results: A total of 450 participants (mean [SD] age, 61.0 [12.0] years; 240 [53.3%] male) completed the baseline survey; 33 participants (7.3%) were Black and 379 participants (84.2%) were White, and 14 participants (3.1%) identified as Hispanic or Latino and 424 participants (94.2%) identified as neither Hispanic nor Latino. There were 192 participants (42.7%) with an annual household income of $60 000 or greater. There was an improvement in financial hardship from diagnosis to 12 months of 0.3 (95% CI, 0.2 to 0.3) points per month (P < .001). Patients with better quality of life and greater self-efficacy had less financial toxicity. Each 1-unit increase in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (rapid version) score was associated with an increase of 0.7 (95% CI, 0.5 to 0.9) points in COST score (P < .001); each 1-unit increase in self-efficacy associated with an increase of 0.6 (95% CI, 0.2 to 1.0) points in COST score (P = .006). Patients who lived in areas with lower neighborhood socioeconomic status had greater financial toxicity. Neighborhood deprivation index was associated with a decrease of 0.3 (95% CI, -0.5 to -0.1) points in COST score (P = .009). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that interventions for financial toxicity in cancer care should focus on counseling to improve self-efficacy and mitigate financial worry and screening for these interventions should include patients at higher risk of financial burden.

Clinical characteristics, racial inequities, and outcomes in patients with breast cancer and COVID-19: A COVID-19 and cancer consortium (CCC19) cohort study.

Background: Limited information is available for patients with breast cancer (BC) and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), especially among underrepresented racial/ethnic populations. Methods: This is a COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19) registry-based retrospective cohort study of females with active or history of BC and laboratory-confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection diagnosed between March 2020 and June 2021 in the US. Primary outcome was COVID-19 severity measured on a five-level ordinal scale, including none of the following complications, hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation, and all-cause mortality. Multivariable ordinal logistic regression model identified characteristics associated with COVID-19 severity. Results: 1383 female patient records with BC and COVID-19 were included in the analysis, the median age was 61 years, and median follow-up was 90 days. Multivariable analysis revealed higher odds of COVID-19 severity for older age (aOR per decade, 1.48 [95% CI, 1.32-1.67]); Black patients (aOR 1.74; 95 CI 1.24-2.45), Asian Americans and Pacific Islander patients (aOR 3.40; 95 CI 1.70-6.79) and Other (aOR 2.97; 95 CI 1.71-5.17) racial/ethnic groups; worse ECOG performance status (ECOG PS ≥2: aOR, 7.78 [95% CI, 4.83-12.5]); pre-existing cardiovascular (aOR, 2.26 [95% CI, 1.63-3.15])/pulmonary comorbidities (aOR, 1.65 [95% CI, 1.20-2.29]); diabetes mellitus (aOR, 2.25 [95% CI, 1.66-3.04]); and active and progressing cancer (aOR, 12.5 [95% CI, 6.89-22.6]). Hispanic ethnicity, timing, and type of anti-cancer therapy modalities were not significantly associated with worse COVID-19 outcomes. The total all-cause mortality and hospitalization rate for the entire cohort was 9% and 37%, respectively however, it varied according to the BC disease status. Conclusions: Using one of the largest registries on cancer and COVID-19, we identified patient and BC-related factors associated with worse COVID-19 outcomes. After adjusting for baseline characteristics, underrepresented racial/ethnic patients experienced worse outcomes compared to non-Hispanic White patients. Funding: This study was partly supported by National Cancer Institute grant number P30 CA068485 to Tianyi Sun, Sanjay Mishra, Benjamin French, Jeremy L Warner; P30-CA046592 to Christopher R Friese; P30 CA023100 for Rana R McKay; P30-CA054174 for Pankil K Shah and Dimpy P Shah; KL2 TR002646 for Pankil Shah and the American Cancer Society and Hope Foundation for Cancer Research (MRSG-16-152-01-CCE) and P30-CA054174 for Dimpy P Shah. REDCap is developed and supported by Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research grant support (UL1 TR000445 from NCATS/NIH). The funding sources had no role in the writing of the manuscript or the decision to submit it for publication. Clinical trial number: CCC19 registry is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04354701.

Clinical Characteristics, Racial Inequities, and Outcomes in Patients with Breast Cancer and COVID-19: A COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19) Cohort Study.

Background: Limited information is available for patients with breast cancer (BC) and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), especially among underrepresented racial/ethnic populations. Methods: This is a COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19) registry-based retrospective cohort study of females with active or history of BC and laboratory-confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection diagnosed between March 2020 and June 2021 in the US. Primary outcome was COVID-19 severity measured on a five-level ordinal scale, including none of the following complications, hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation, and all-cause mortality. Multivariable ordinal logistic regression model identified characteristics associated with COVID-19 severity. Results: 1,383 female patient records with BC and COVID-19 were included in the analysis, the median age was 61 years, and median follow-up was 90 days. Multivariable analysis revealed higher odds of COVID-19 severity for older age (aOR per decade, 1.48 [95% CI, 1.32 - 1.67]); Black patients (aOR 1.74; 95 CI 1.24-2.45), Asian Americans and Pacific Islander patients (aOR 3.40; 95 CI 1.70 - 6.79) and Other (aOR 2.97; 95 CI 1.71-5.17) racial/ethnic groups; worse ECOG performance status (ECOG PS ≥2: aOR, 7.78 [95% CI, 4.83 - 12.5]); pre-existing cardiovascular (aOR, 2.26 [95% CI, 1.63 - 3.15])/pulmonary comorbidities (aOR, 1.65 [95% CI, 1.20 - 2.29]); diabetes mellitus (aOR, 2.25 [95% CI, 1.66 - 3.04]); and active and progressing cancer (aOR, 12.5 [95% CI, 6.89 - 22.6]). Hispanic ethnicity, timing and type of anti-cancer therapy modalities were not significantly associated with worse COVID-19 outcomes. The total all-cause mortality and hospitalization rate for the entire cohort was 9% and 37%, respectively however, it varied according to the BC disease status. Conclusions: Using one of the largest registries on cancer and COVID-19, we identified patient and BC related factors associated with worse COVID-19 outcomes. After adjusting for baseline characteristics, underrepresented racial/ethnic patients experienced worse outcomes compared to Non-Hispanic White patients.

Pancreatic cancer among Pacific Islanders: a comprehensive analysis of an understudied racial group.

OBJECTIVE: Racial disparities in care and outcome have been demonstrated for several cancers, but it is not clear that a similar discrepancy exists for pancreatic cancer. Furthermore, there are limited data describing the pancreatic cancer experience of Pacific Islanders. The primary objective of this study was to analyze the clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of Pacific Islander patients with pancreatic cancer. DESIGN: We obtained data for a consecutive sample of pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients who presented to the largest hospital in Hawaii from 1 January 2000, through 31 December 2019. Analyses were performed for the entire population and separately for patients who had their cancer resected. Overall survival was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards regression models were constructed to determine the prognostic capacity of clinical and pathologic factors. RESULTS: A total of 1040 patients were included in the final analysis. Pacific islanders presented at a significantly younger age compared to Whites or Asians and had the highest Medicaid rate. There were no statistically significant racial differences in stage at presentation or treatments. We did not demonstrate an association between race and survival on univariate analysis, nor after adjusting for demographic and tumor factors. Age, stage, and treatment were significantly associated with survival for both univariate and multivariate analyses. CONCLUSION: We did not demonstrate disparate outcomes among Pacific Islanders with pancreatic cancer. This is likely due in part to the absence of a screening test and the notable poor prognosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Furthermore, equity in treatment may have contributed to racial parity in survival.

Racial Disparities in Patient-Provider Communication During Telehealth Visits Versus Face-to-face Visits Among Asian and Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander Patients With Cancer: Cross-sectional Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Telehealth visits increase patients' access to care and are often rated as "just as good" as face-to-face visits by oncology patients. Telehealth visits have become increasingly more common in the care of patients with cancer since the advent of the COVID-19 pandemic. Asians and Pacific Islanders are two of the fastest growing racial groups in the United States, but there are few studies assessing patient satisfaction with telemedicine among these two racial groups. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to compare satisfaction with communication during telehealth visits versus face-to-face visits among oncology patients, with a specific focus on Asian patients and Native Hawaiian and other Pacific Islander (NHOPI) patients. METHODS: We surveyed a racially diverse group of patients who were treated at community cancer centers in Hawaii and had recently experienced a face-to-face visit or telehealth visit. Questions for assessing satisfaction with patient-physician communication were adapted from a previously published study of cancer survivors. Variables that impact communication, including age, sex, household income, education level, and cancer type and stage, were captured. Multivariable logistic models for patient satisfaction were created, with adjustments for sociodemographic factors. RESULTS: Participants who attended a face-to-face visit reported higher levels of satisfaction in all communication measures than those reported by participants who underwent a telehealth encounter. The univariate analysis revealed lower levels of satisfaction during telehealth visits among Asian participants and NHOPI participants compared to those among White participants for all measures of communication (eg, when asked to what degree "[y]our physician listened carefully to you"). Asian patients and NHOPI patients were significantly less likely than White patients to strongly agree with the statement (P<.004 and P<.007, respectively). Racial differences in satisfaction with communication persisted in the multivariate analysis even after adjusting for sociodemographic factors. There were no significant racial differences in communication during face-to-face visits. CONCLUSIONS: Asian patients and NHOPI patients were significantly less content with patient-physician communication during telehealth visits when compared to White patients. This difference among racial groups was not seen in face-to-face visits. The observation that telehealth increases racial disparities in health care satisfaction should prompt further exploration.

Impact of Breast Cancer Awareness Month on Public Interest in the United States between 2012 and 2021: A Google Trends Analysis.

Breast Cancer Awareness Month (BCAM) has a long history of over 30 years, established in 1985 to occur every October, and the National Breast Cancer Foundation now leads the operation. There have been no studies to evaluate the impact of the BCAM on public awareness of breast cancer. We analyzed the impact of BCAM on public awareness of breast cancer in the U.S. from 2012 to 2021 using the relative search volume (RSV) of Google Trends as a surrogate. We also analyzed the impact of Lung Cancer Awareness Month (LCAM) and Prostate Cancer Awareness Month (PCAM) on public awareness of lung and prostate cancer, respectively, to see differences in their effectiveness among the health observances for the top three most common cancers in the U.S. We performed a joinpoint regression analysis to identify statistically significant time points of a change in trend. There were joinpoints around BCAM for "Breast cancer" every year from 2012 to 2021, with a significant increase in the weekly RSVs from 21.9% to 46.7%. Except for 2013 and 2015 for "Lung cancer", when significant increases in the RSV at 1.8% and 1.2% per week were observed around LCAM, no joinpoints were noted around LCAM or PCAM. These results imply that BCAM has successfully improved the public awareness of breast cancer in the U.S. compared to other representative health observances, likely due to the effective involvement of non-medical industries, influencers affected by breast cancer, and an awareness symbol.

Overcoming racial disparities in cancer clinical trial enrollment of Asians and Native Hawaiians.

Background: Asians and Native Hawaiians are two of the fastest growing minority populations in the United States, however these racial minority groups are severely underrepresented in clinical trials. This study looks at cancer clinical trial accrual among Asians and Native Hawaiians in a community-based network with a mission of increasing minority accrual to studies. Methods: The University of Hawaii Cancer Center (UHCC) network enrolls patients to treatment and non-treatment cancer studies. Enrollment on studies opened between 2009 and 2013 were obtained from UHCC's clinical trial management system. Incidence of cancer by race was acquired from the Hawaii Tumor Registry. Enrollment fractions were compared for the most common races in the state: White, Asian (specifically Chinese, Filipino, Japanese), and Native Hawaiian. Results: Whites comprised the largest proportion of cancer patients and participants in trials. Asians and Native Hawaiians were enrolled into cancer clinical trials at the same or higher enrollment fraction compared to Whites. Chinese, Japanese, and Native Hawaiian patients participated in treatment trials significantly more often than Whites (p < 0.05). Similarly, Chinese and Native Hawaiians enrolled in non-treatment trials at a significantly higher rate compared to Whites (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The UHCC network has instituted many strategies to increase minority accrual that have likely led to Asian and Native Hawaiian patients participating in studies at least as often as White patients. The strategies implemented at UHCC may benefit similar communities with a high number of minority cancer patients.

Disaggregating Data on Pacific Islander Gastric Cancer Patients Reveals Survival Disparity.

PURPOSE: The incidence and prognosis of Pacific Islanders with gastric cancer is not well documented as previous studies have often aggregated this population with Asians. The purpose of our study was to describe patient and tumor characteristics, as well as prognostic factors of Pacific Islanders with gastric cancer. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with gastroesophageal junction or gastric adenocarcinoma between 2000 and 2014 were identified in the tumor registry of the largest hospital in Hawaii. Overall survival of Asians, Whites, and Pacific Islanders were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards regression models were constructed to assess predictors of survival adjusting for clinical and pathological factors. RESULTS: A total of 615 patients were included in the final analysis. Pacific Islanders were found to present at a younger age, were more often uninsured or had Medicaid insurance, and were diagnosed with a higher stage of cancer compared to their Asian and White counterparts. Pacific Islanders were less likely to undergo surgery even after adjusting for stage. Race was a prognostic factor and survival was lowest among Pacific Islanders, but only if the model was unadjusted for treatment. CONCLUSIONS: We present an analysis of the largest cohort of Pacific Islander gastric cancer patients. Pacific Islanders have different sociodemographic characteristics and inferior survival compared to Asian patients and should be independently studied.

Transarterial Radioembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Major Vascular Invasion: A Nationwide Propensity Score-Matched Analysis with Target Trial Emulation.

PURPOSE: To examine National Cancer Database (NCDB) data to comparatively evaluate overall survival (OS) between patients undergoing transarterial radioembolization (TARE) and those undergoing systemic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma with major vascular invasion (HCC-MVI). METHODS: One thousand five hundred fourteen patients with HCC-MVI undergoing first-line TARE or systemic therapy were identified from the NCDB. OS was compared using propensity score-matched Cox regression and landmark analysis. Efficacy was also compared within a target trial framework. RESULTS: TARE usage doubled between 2010 and 2015. Intervals before treatment were longer for TARE than for systemic therapy (mean [median], 66.5 [60] days vs 46.8 (35) days, respectively, P < .0001). In propensity-score-matched and landmark-time-adjusted analyses, TARE was found to be associated with a hazard ratio of 0.74 (95 % CI, 0.60-0.91; P = .005) and median OS of 7.1 months (95 % CI, 5.0-10.5) versus 4.9 months (95 % CI, 3.9-6.5) for systemically treated patients. In an emulated target trial involving 236 patients with unilobular HCC-MVI, a low number of comorbidities, creatinine levels <2.0 mg/dL, bilirubin levels <2.0 mg/dL, and international normalized ratio <1.7, TARE was found to be associated with a hazard ratio of 0.57 (95 % CI, 0.39-0.83; P = .004) and a median OS of 12.9 months (95 % CI, 7.6-19.2) versus 6.5 months (95 % CI, 3.6-11.1) for the systemic therapy arm. CONCLUSIONS: In propensity-score-matched analyses involving pragmatic and target trial HCC-MVI cohorts, TARE was found to be associated with significant survival benefits compared with systemic therapy. Although not a substitute for prospective trials, these findings suggest that the increasing use of TARE for HCC-MVI is accompanied by improved OS. Further trials of TARE in patients with HCC-MVI are needed, especially to compare with newer systemic therapies.

A 95-gene signature stratifies recurrence risk of invasive disease in ER-positive, HER2-negative, node-negative breast cancer with intermediate 21-gene signature recurrence scores.

PURPOSE: A subset of patients with intermediate 21-gene signature assay recurrence score may benefit from adjuvant chemoendocrine therapy, but a predictive strategy is needed to identify such patients. The 95-gene signature assay was tested to stratify patients with intermediate RS into high (95GC-H) and low (95GC-L) groups that were associated with invasive recurrence risk. METHODS: Patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative, node-negative breast cancer and RS 11-25 who underwent definitive surgery and adjuvant endocrine therapy without any cytotoxic agents were included. RNA was extracted from archived formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples, and 95-gene signature was calculated. RESULTS: 206 patients had RS of 11-25 (95GC-L, N = 163; 95GC-H, N = 43). In Cox proportional hazards model, 95GC-H was significantly associated with shorter time to recurrence than was 95GC-L (HR 5.94; 95%CI 1.81-19.53; P = 0.005). The correlation between 95-gene signature and 21-gene signature assay scores was not strong (correlation coefficient r = 0.27), which might suggest that 95-gene signature reflects biological characteristics differing from what 21-gene signature shows. CONCLUSIONS: The 95-gene signature stratifies patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative, node-negative invasive breast cancer and intermediate RS of 11-25 into high and low groups that are associated with recurrence risk of invasive disease. Further retrospective analysis in the prospectively accrued TAILORx population is warranted to confirm that 95-gene signature can identify patients who would benefit from adjuvant chemoendocrine therapy.

Factors and Survival Implications associated with biopsy of hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the few cancers that can be diagnosed based on imaging findings alone. The factors associated with the decision to perform a biopsy and the clinical impact have not been previously studied. METHODS: We collected data of patients diagnosed with HCC between 2004 and 2015 from the National Cancer Database. We assessed associations between biopsy and survival with demographic and clinical factors. RESULTS: We included 160,507 patients. The median age was 62 (40-90), 74.1% were male and 74.9% were white. Over the 12-year period, 47.7% (76,524/160,517) underwent a biopsy. Factors associated with a biopsy were black race, older age, presence of metastatic disease, larger tumor size, and treatment at a community cancer center. Factors associated with increased mortality were older age, higher comorbidity index, larger tumor size, presence of metastatic disease, higher AFP and elevated bilirubin. There was a significant decreased use of biopsy over successive years (2007-2015). After adjusting for prognostic factors, biopsy had no significant impact on survival HR 1.01 (95%CI 1.00-1.03. p = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: A significant number of patients underwent a biopsy. Performing a biopsy did not have a significant impact on survival.

Internal Medicine Residents' Perception of Cancer Prognosis.

Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the USA. Many internal medicine physicians feel uncomfortable having to prognosticate; however, oncology patients often ask this of them. The inability to provide an accurate prognosis could lead a patient to make a treatment decision incongruent with their true wishes. We conducted this study to assess resident and attending physicians' knowledge of cancer prognosis and to establish the source of residents' knowledge. We conducted a prospective, cross-sectional study to assess internal medicine resident and attending physician knowledge of median survival for seven different oncologic case scenarios. Correct answers were defined by results of randomized, phase III trials. Residents were asked to identify the source(s) of information that most significantly influenced their choices. All residents and attending physicians affiliated with the University of Hawaii were invited to participate. A total of 67 of 85 surveys (78.8%) were completed, representing 41 residents and 26 attending physicians. Overall, the respondents correctly estimated median survival 42.6% of the time. The respondents underestimated more often than overestimated median survival (46.3% vs. 14.9%, p = 0.0001). Seventy-three percent of residents cited inpatient experience as influencing their oncologic knowledge. Internal medicine residents and attending physicians correctly estimate median survival of cancer patients less than 50% of the time and often underestimate survival. Inpatient rotations, where residents care for the oncologic patients experiencing significant complications of their cancer and treatment, may be giving them an unbalanced perspective on cancer prognosis.

Transcriptomics Associates Molecular Features with 18F-Fluorocholine PET/CT Imaging Phenotype and Its Potential Relationship to Survival in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Studies involving transcriptomics have revealed multiple molecular subtypes of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has also identified distinct molecular imaging subtypes, including those with increased and decreased choline metabolism as measured by the tissue uptake of the radiopharmaceutical 18F-fluorocholine. Gene signatures reflecting the molecular heterogeneity of HCC may identify the biological and clinical significance of these imaging subtypes. In this study, 41 patients underwent 18F-fluorocholine PET/CT, followed by tumor resection and gene expression profiling. Over- and underexpressed components of previously published gene signatures were evaluated for enrichment between tumors with high and low 18F-fluorocholine uptake using gene set analysis. Significant gene sets were enumerated by FDR based on phenotype permutation. Associations with overall survival were analyzed by univariate and multivariate proportional hazards regression. Ten gene sets related to HCC were significantly associated with high tumor 18F-fluorocholine uptake at FDR q < 0.05, including those from three different clinical molecular classification systems and two prognostic signatures for HCC that showed predictive value in the study cohort. Tumor avidity for 18F-fluorocholine was associated with favorable characteristics based on these signatures with lower mortality based on survival analysis (HR 0.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.14-0.95). Tumors demonstrating high 18F-fluorocholine uptake were also enriched for genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation, fatty acid metabolism, peroxisome, bile acid metabolism, xenobiotic metabolism, and adipogenesis. These results provide a pathobiological framework to further evaluate 18F-fluorocholine PET/CT as a molecular and prognostic classifier in HCC. SIGNIFICANCE: A pathobiological framework for HCC brings together multiple prognostically relevant gene signatures via convergence with 18F-fluorocholine PET/CT imaging phenotype.

Creating a "culture of research" in a community hospital: Strategies and tools from the National Cancer Institute Community Cancer Centers Program.

BACKGROUND: The value of community-based cancer research has long been recognized. In addition to the National Cancer Institute's Community Clinical and Minority-Based Oncology Programs established in 1983, and 1991 respectively, the National Cancer Institute established the National Cancer Institute Community Cancer Centers Program in 2007 with an aim of enhancing access to high-quality cancer care and clinical research in the community setting where most cancer patients receive their treatment. This article discusses strategies utilized by the National Cancer Institute Community Cancer Centers Program to build research capacity and create a more entrenched culture of research at the community hospitals participating in the program over a 7-year period. METHODS: To facilitate development of a research culture at the community hospitals, the National Cancer Institute Community Cancer Centers Program required leadership or chief executive officer engagement; utilized a collaborative learning structure where best practices, successes, and challenges could be shared; promoted site-to-site mentoring to foster faster learning within and between sites; required research program assessments that spanned clinical trial portfolio, accrual barriers, and outreach; increased identification and use of metrics; and, finally, encouraged research team engagement across hospital departments (navigation, multidisciplinary care, pathology, and disparities) to replace the traditionally siloed approach to clinical trials. LIMITATIONS: The health-care environment is rapidly changing while complexity in research increases. Successful research efforts are impacted by numerous factors (e.g. institutional review board reviews, physician interest, and trial availability). The National Cancer Institute Community Cancer Centers Program sites, as program participants, had access to the required resources and support to develop and implement the strategies described. Metrics are an important component yet often challenging to identify and collect. The model requires a strong emphasis on outreach that challenges hospitals to improve and expand their reach, particularly into underrepresented populations and catchment areas. These efforts build on trust and a referral pipeline within the community which take time and significant commitment to establish. CONCLUSION: The National Cancer Institute Community Cancer Centers Program experience provides a relevant model to broadly address creating a culture of research in community hospitals that are increasingly networked via systems and consortiums. The strategies used align well with the National Cancer Institute-American Society of Clinical Oncology Accrual Symposium recommendations for patient-/community-, physician-/provider-, and site-/organizational-level approaches to clinical trials; they helped sites achieve organizational culture shifts that enhanced their cancer research programs. The National Cancer Institute Community Cancer Centers Program hospitals reported that the strategies were challenging to implement yet proved valuable as they provided useful metrics for programmatic assessment, planning, reporting, and growth. While focused on oncology trials, these concepts may be useful within other disease-focused research as well.

Nodular sclerosing Hodgkin's lymphoma presenting with a pseudo-breast mass extending from a necrotizing granulomatous mediastinal tumor.

Nodular sclerosing Hodgkin's lymphoma commonly presents with a mediastinal mass, but it rarely compresses or invades mediastinal structures or the anterior chest wall. Histologically, it can cause necrotizing granulomatous inflammation. A woman with a right breast mass extending from an asymptomatic large mediastinal mass selectively compressing the trachea is presented. A computed tomography-guided core needle biopsy from the anterior chest wall mass revealed necrotizing granulomatous inflammation. Finally, the diagnosis of nodular sclerosing Hodgkin's lymphoma was made by incisional biopsy. Clinical suspicion of nodular sclerosing Hodgkin's lymphoma is crucial since an adequate tissue diagnosis is needed when the initial less invasive diagnostic testing is inconclusive.

Apoptosis-stimulating protein of p53 (ASPP2) heterozygous mice are tumor-prone and have attenuated cellular damage-response thresholds.

The expression of ASPP2 (53BP2L), a proapoptotic member of a family of p53-binding proteins, is frequently suppressed in many human cancers. Accumulating evidence suggests that ASPP2 inhibits tumor growth; however, the mechanisms by which ASPP2 suppresses tumor formation remain to be clarified. To study this, we targeted the ASPP2 allele in a mouse by replacing exons 10-17 with a neoR gene. ASPP2(-/-) mice were not viable because of an early embryonic lethal event. Although ASPP2(+/-) mice appeared developmentally normal, they displayed an increased incidence of a variety of spontaneous tumors as they aged. Moreover, gamma-irradiated 6-week-old ASPP2(+/-) mice developed an increased incidence of high-grade T cell lymphomas of thymic origin compared with ASPP2(+/+) mice. Primary thymocytes derived from ASPP2(+/-) mice exhibited an attenuated apoptotic response to gamma-irradiation compared with ASPP2(+/+) thymocytes. Additionally, ASPP2(+/-) primary mouse embryonic fibroblasts demonstrated a defective G(0)/G(1) cell cycle checkpoint after gamma-irradiation. Our results demonstrate that ASPP2 is a haploinsufficient tumor suppressor and, importantly, open new avenues for investigation into the mechanisms by which disruption of ASPP2 pathways could play a role in tumorigenesis and response to therapy.