A Small Number of Surgeons Perform the Large Majority of Uncommon Nerve Decompression Procedures.

BACKGROUND: Notable surgeon-to-surgeon variation in rates of uncommon surgery can reflect appropriate concentration of expertise with technically difficult or risky procedures that address problematic impairment due to objective pathophysiology. Examples include vascularized tissue transfer or transplantation to address complex tissue loss and release of bony elbow ankylosis. Perhaps more problematic is notable variation in straightforward, discretionary surgeries intended to alleviate pain, offered in the absence of objectively measurable pathophysiology, and without experimental evidence of benefit over placebo and other nonspecific effects. Evidence of concentration of this type of surgery in the hands of a few surgeons might point to inordinate influence of surgeon opinions on patient behavior. A study of variation in operations for upper extremity peripheral mononeuropathy has the potential to uncover potentially problematic variation. There are billing codes specific to common surgeries that can benefit patients with objectively verifiable neuropathies. And there are billing codes that represent less common nerve decompression surgeries that in many cases are offered in the absence of both objective evidence of pathophysiology as well as experimental evidence that surgery alleviates pain better than simulated surgery. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked the following questions: (1) Among surgeons who billed a mean of at least 10 carpal tunnel releases (CTRs) per year in patients with Medicare insurance in the United States, how many also performed at least one less common peripheral nerve release and cubital tunnel release (CubTR) per year? (2) Among surgeons who billed a mean of at least one less common peripheral nerve release or CubTR on average per year, what is the median and range of the number of less common peripheral nerve releases and CubTRs and the relative proportion of these compared with CTRs per year? (3) Are there any differences in gender, specialty, and number of CTRs and CubTRs between surgeons who performed at least one less common nerve decompression and surgeons who, on average, performed none? METHODS: Using the Medicare Physician & Other Practitioners - by Provider and Service database, we identified surgeons who perform a minimum of 10 CTRs per year. Because this database has all surgeries billed to Medicare performed in any setting by individual surgeons, it is well suited to the study of surgeon-specific operative rates among Medicare patients. Among 7259 clinicians who billed one or more nerve procedure to Medicare between January 2013 and December 2019, we excluded 120 nonsurgical clinicians, 47 podiatrists, and 1561 clinicians who billed procedures as an organization. Among the remaining 5531 surgeons, 5439 performed at least 10 CTRs on average per year, which we considered representative of surgeons who include nerve decompression surgery as a part of their practice. Among these 5439 surgeons, we calculated the mean number of CTRs, CubTRs, and less common peripheral nerve releases (including decompression of a digital nerve, nerve in hand or wrist, ulnar nerve at the wrist, brachial plexus, and unspecified nerve) per year between 2013 and 2019. Decompression of the median nerve at the carpal tunnel, the ulnar nerve at the cubital tunnel, and, much less frequently, the ulnar nerve at the wrist typically addresses measurable neuropathy. The other nerve releases are often performed for illnesses characterized by pain that are defined, in part, by the absence of experimentally verifiable pathophysiology such as radial tunnel and pronator (or lacertus) syndromes. We counted the number of surgeons who billed an average of at least one less common peripheral nerve release and CubTR per year; the median and range of the number of less common nerve releases and CubTRs and their relative proportion among those subsets of surgeons; and differences in the number of surgeons who performed one or none less common surgery by gender, specialty, and volume of CTR/CubTR surgery. RESULTS: Of 5439 surgeons who performed a mean of at least 10 CTRs per year, 2% (93) performed a mean of at least one less common peripheral nerve release per year among patients on Medicare, 14% (775) at least one CubTR, and 1% (47) performed both. Surgeons who performed a mean of at least one less common peripheral nerve release per year performed a median (IQR) of 7 (3 to 17) per year (with a maximum of 153 per year), representing approximately one less common peripheral nerve release for every five CTRs. Sixty-five percent (4076 of 6272) of all less common nerve procedures were performed by the top 20 billing surgeons. Gender was not associated with doing one or more uncommon nerve releases (women 1% [6 of 413], men 2% [87 of 5026]; p = 0.84), but specialty was, with plastic surgeons leading (6% [20 of 340] compared with 1% [73 of 5087] for other types of surgeons; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The observation that a relatively small number of surgeons perform a large majority of the surgery for nerve syndromes conceptualized as accounting for arm pain suggests that most surgeons are cautious about ascribing pain to conceptual nerve compression syndromes and offering surgery. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: An approach to surgical care founded on ethical principles regards this type of notable variation as a signal of inordinate influence of surgeon opinion on patient behavior, suggesting that professional conduct may be supported by safeguards such as checklists that help guide patients to choices consistent with their values unclouded by surgeon beliefs, false hope, and common misconceptions.

Surgeon variation in rates of surgery for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis in the United States.

We identified wide variation in surgery for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis among surgeons in the United States, with 42% performing no surgery, a median rate of surgery of 1.9/year, and 2% performed more than 30 procedures annually, representing 15% of all surgical procedures for TMC arthritis.

Parsing the toxicity paradox: Composition and duration of exposure alter predicted oil spill effects by orders of magnitude.

Oil spilled into an aquatic environment produces oil droplet and dissolved component concentrations and compositions that are highly variable in space and time. Toxic effects on aquatic biota vary with sensitivity of the organism, concentration, composition, environmental conditions, and frequency and duration of exposure to the mixture of oil-derived dissolved compounds. For a range of spill (surface, subsea, blowout) and oil types under different environmental conditions, modeling of oil transport, fate, and organism behavior was used to quantify expected exposures over time for planktonic, motile, and stationary organisms. Different toxicity models were applied to these exposure time histories to characterize the influential roles of composition, concentration, and duration of exposure on aquatic toxicity. Misrepresenting these roles and exposures can affect results by orders of magnitude. Well-characterized laboratory studies for <24-hour exposures are needed to improve toxicity predictions of the typically short-term exposures that characterize spills.

Protocol of a Multicenter Prospective Trial of Office-Based Carpal Tunnel Release With Ultrasound Guidance (ROBUST).

Background Carpal tunnel release (CTR) is a common surgical procedure for patients with severe or refractory carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) symptoms. Historically, CTR procedures have been performed in a hospital or an ambulatory surgery center (ASC). However, due to advancements in techniques, greater patient demand, and concerns about growing healthcare costs, there is a distinct trend toward performing CTR procedures in an office-based setting. Several small studies with limited follow-up duration have demonstrated the feasibility of CTR with ultrasound guidance (CTR-US) when performed in an office-based setting. The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of office-based CTR-US in a large cohort of patients (n=140) with symptomatic CTS followed for two years post-treatment. Design and methods ROBUST is a prospective multicenter observational study in which 140 subjects at up to 12 sites in the United States will be treated with CTR-US in an office-based setting. The primary endpoint of the study is the change in the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire Symptom Severity Scale score. Secondary endpoints include time to return to normal daily activities, time to return to work among employed subjects, change in the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire Functional Status Scale score, change in the Michigan Hand Questionnaire overall and domain scores, change in the Numeric Pain Scale score, change in the EuroQoL-5 Dimension 5-Level score, global satisfaction scores, and the incidence of device or procedure-related adverse events. The primary analysis of study endpoints will occur three months post-treatment. Patient follow-up in this study will continue for two years. Conclusions A central institutional review board approved the study protocol, and a data safety monitoring board will provide study oversight. The authors plan to report study results at medical conferences and in peer-reviewed medical journals. The outcomes of ROBUST will provide physicians, patients, and payors with important safety and effectiveness data regarding the clinical utility of CTR-US when performed in an office setting.

Recommendations for improving the reporting and communication of aquatic toxicity studies for oil spill planning, response, and environmental assessment.

Standardized oil toxicity testing is important to ensure comparability of study results, and to generate information to support oil spill planning, response, and environmental assessments. Outcomes from toxicity tests are useful in the development, improvement and validation of effects models, and new or revised knowledge could be integrated into existing databases and related tools. To foster transparency, facilitate repeatability and maximize use and impact, outcomes from toxicity tests need to be clearly reported and communicated. This work is part of a series of reviews to support the modernization of the "Chemical Response to Oil Spills: Ecological Effects Research Forum" protocols focusing on technological advances and best toxicity testing practices. Thus, the primary motivation of the present work is to provide guidance and encourage detailed documentation of aquatic toxicity studies. Specific recommendations are provided regarding key reporting elements (i.e., experimental design, test substance and properties, test species and response endpoints, media preparation, exposure conditions, chemical characterization, reporting metric corresponding to the response endpoint, data quality standards, and statistical methods, and raw data), which along with a proposed checklist can be used to assess the completeness of reporting elements or to guide study conduct. When preparing journal publications, authors are encouraged to take advantage of the Supplementary Material section to enhance dissemination and access to key data and information that can be used by multiple end-users, including decision-makers, scientific support staff and modelers. Improving reporting, science communication, and access to critical information enable users to assess the reliability and relevance of study outcomes and increase incorporation of results gleaned from toxicity testing into tools and applications that support oil spill response decisions. Furthermore, improved reporting could be beneficial for audiences outside the oil spill response community, including peer reviewers, journal editors, aquatic toxicologists, researchers in other disciplines, and the public.

Optimizing Outcomes By Optimizing Bone Health.

Orthopaedic surgeons have long been aware of the importance of metabolic bone health for fracture healing; however, recent attention has focused on optimization of bone health before elective surgery and also regarding pathways to ensure patients have appropriate evaluation and treatment for bone health issues. It is important to describe issues of importance to fragility fracture care and prevention and optimization of outcomes before elective or fracture surgery. To address the challenge of who has the time, expertise, and appropriate patient contact to identify and treat patients at risk of bone metabolic issues, one model for a suggested pathway to ensure these patients are identified and treated is outlined.

Nerve Conditions of the Upper Limb: How Not to Miss or Mismanage.

There are several issues associated with nerve compression syndromes of the upper limb; ultrasonography is a useful diagnostic tool. The orthopaedic surgeon should know how to evaluate and treat patients who do not obtain expected relief following carpal or cubital tunnel release, and also be knowledgeable about the workup and evaluation of patients with conditions of debatable pathology and treatment, such as radial tunnel syndrome or pronator syndrome. Recent studies on suprascapular neuropathy include discussions about the pathophysiology and etiology of the condition, its natural history, and who might benefit from surgery.

Surgical management of osteoarthritis in the shoulder and elbow.

Interesting recent trends are apparent in the setting of shoulder and elbow pathology. There is an increase in utilization of shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis and post traumatic arthritis. At the same time, there remain limited options for osteoarthritis of the elbow particularly in the young and or active patient. This manuscript details surgical options for osteoarthritis at the elbow and shoulder.

The bioavailability of oil droplets trapped in river gravel by hyporheic flows.

Little is known about the fate of oil spills in rivers. Hyporheic flows of water through river sediments exchange surface and groundwater and create upwelling and downwelling zones that are important for fish spawning and embryo development. Risk assessments of oil spills to rivers do not consider the potential for hyporheic flows to carry oil droplets into sediments and the potential for prolonged exposure of fish to trapped oil. This project assessed whether oil droplets in water flowing through gravel will be trapped and whether hydrocarbons partitioning from trapped oil droplets are bioavailable to fish. Columns packed with gravel were injected with oil-in-water dispersions prepared with light crude, medium crude, diluted bitumens, and heavy fuel oil to generate a series of oil droplet loadings. The concentrations of oil trapped in the gravel increased with oil loading and viscosity. When the columns were perfused with clean water, oil concentrations in column effluents decreased to the detection limit within the first week of water flow, with sporadically higher concentrations associated with oil droplet release. Despite the low concentrations of hydrocarbons measured in column effluent, hydrocarbons were bioavailable to juvenile rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) for more than three weeks of water flow, as indicated by strong induction of liver ethoxyresorufin-o-deethylase activity. These findings indicate that ecological risk assessments and spill response should identify and protect areas in rivers sensitive to contaminant trapping.

Ethics and Professionalism: The Role of Self-Regulation and Peer Review in Maintaining Hand Surgery's Standards.

The practice of hand surgery is bound by the need for each of us to maintain our profession's high standards by fulfilling our peers' and society's expectations regarding ethical and professional behavior. Our profession is self-regulated by local, state, and national organizations, which provide expectations and standards for practice. This manuscript reviews the resources available from such organizations to foster standards of practice.

Editorial Commentary: Elbow Arthroscopy Is a Safe Procedure. Sure.

Elbow arthroscopy is a procedure that is of great potential use and yet also of grave potential risks. To balance the risk-versus-reward consideration, one must be aware of the potential complications associated with this procedure, weigh them against the potential advantages, and understand one's own skills and familiarity with the procedure. There is no doubt that elbow arthroscopy has changed and even revolutionized our management of pathology about the elbow; however, one must bear in mind that this comes at a risk of complications that cannot be reduced to zero.

Hemiarthroplasty Is an Option for Patients Older Than 70 Years With Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis.

Hemiarthroplasty (HA) of the shoulder has several potential advantages over total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), particularly in the elderly population. This study reviewed long-term results of HA and TSA in patients older than 70 years with glenohumeral osteoarthritis. During a 30-year period, 403 shoulders had undergone HA (n=74) or TSA (n=329) for glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Outcome measures included pain, range of motion, and postoperative modified Neer ratings. All patients were included in the mortality and revision analyses. A total of 289 shoulders (44 HAs and 245 TSAs; mean patient age, 75 years) with a minimum of 5 years of follow-up or follow-up until revision were included. Both groups showed significant improvements in pain, abduction, and external rotation. No significant differences were detected between groups in postoperative pain, range of motion, or modified Neer ratings. Operative time was significantly lower in the HA group. There was no statistically significant difference detected in implant revision-free survival between TSA and HA (hazard ratio, 3.09) or in overall survival hazard ratio. At long-term follow-up, both HAs and TSAs provided good function in the elderly population. Patients who underwent TSA and patients who underwent HA had similar results, but the latter had a shorter operative time and lower revision rate. Hemiarthroplasty is a reasonable option for patients older than 70 years with end-stage glenohumeral osteoarthritis. [Orthopedics. 2018; 41(4):222-228.].

Late Reconstruction of the Interosseous Membrane with Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Graft for Chronic Essex-Lopresti Injuries: Outcomes with a Mean Follow-up of Over 10 Years.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to report our long-term outcomes following reconstruction of the forearm interosseous membrane (IOM) with bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) graft for treatment of chronic Essex-Lopresti injuries. METHODS: We identified 33 patients who underwent IOM reconstruction with BPTB graft for chronic Essex-Lopresti injuries over a 20-year treatment interval. Twenty male and 13 female patients, with a mean age of 42.1 years (range, 19 to 73 years) and a minimum follow-up interval of 5 years, were included. Preinjury clinical examination and radiographic measurements were obtained from records for comparison with prospectively collected data. Additional functional outcome data collected postoperatively included QuickDASH (an abbreviated version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand [DASH]), modified Mayo wrist (MMW), and Broberg-Morrey elbow function scores. RESULTS: IOM reconstruction was performed at a mean interval (and standard deviation) of 44.9 ± 60.0 months (range, 6.4 to 208 months) from the time of the initial injury. At a mean follow-up of 10.9 ± 4.4 years (range, 5.5 to 24.2 years), significant improvements were observed in mean elbow flexion-extension arc (+13° [95% confidence interval (CI), 4° to 22°]; p = 0.005), wrist flexion-extension arc (+19° [95% CI, 4° to 34°]; p = 0.016), forearm pronation-supination (+23° [95% CI, 8° to 39°]; p = 0.004), and grip strength (+25% of that of the contralateral side [95% CI, 18% to 32% of contralateral side]; p < 0.001). Improvements in ulnar variance were sustained over the long term from +3.9 mm (95% CI, 3.2 to 4.6 mm) preoperatively to -1.6 mm (95% CI, -2.3 to -0.9 mm) immediately postoperatively and -1.1 mm (95% CI, -1.8 to -0.4 mm) at the time of the final follow-up (p < 0.001). The mean QuickDASH, MMW, and Broberg-Morrey scores were 29.8 (range, 5 to 61), 82.7 (range, 60 to 100), and 91.6 (range, 64 to 100), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: IOM reconstruction with a BPTB graft is an effective treatment option for chronic Essex-Lopresti injuries, with satisfactory clinical and functional outcomes over the long term. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Examination of Skill Acquisition and Grader Bias in a Distal Radius Fracture Fixation Model.

OBJECTIVES: Primary: Assess the ability of faculty graders to predict the objectively measured strength of distal radius fracture fixation. Secondary: Compare resident skill variation and retention related to other knowable training data. DESIGN: Residents were allowed 60 minutes to stabilize a standardized distal radius fracture using an assigned fixed-angle volar plate. Faculty observed and subjectively graded the residents without providing real-time feedback. Objective biomechanical evaluation (construct strength and stiffness) was compared to subjective grades. Resident-specific characteristics (sex, PGY, and ACGME case log) were also used to compare the objective data. SETTING: A simulated operating room in our laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Post-graduate year 2, 3, 4, and 5 orthopedic residents. RESULTS: Primary: Faculty were not successful at predicting objectively measured fixation, and their subjective scoring suggests confirmation bias as PGY increased. Secondary: Resident year-in-training alone did not predict objective measures (p = 0.53), but was predictive of subjective scores (p < 0.001). Skills learned were not always retained, as 29% of residents objectively failed subsequent to passing. Notably, resident-reported case-specific experience alone was inversely correlated with objective fixation strength. CONCLUSIONS: This testing model enabled the collection of objective and subjective resident skill scores. Faculty graders did not routinely predict objective measures, and their subjective assessment appears biased related to PGY. Also, in vivo case volume alone does not predict objective results. Familiar faculty teaching consistency, and resident grading by external faculty unfamiliar with tested residents, might alter these results.

Forearm Instability: Anatomy, Biomechanics, and Treatment Options.

The forearm unit consists of the radius and ulna, a complex and interrelated set of joints (distal radioulnar joint, proximal radioulnar joint) and the soft tissue stabilizers between the 3 bones. Distally, this is represented by the triangular fibrocartilage complex at the wrist, proximally by the annular ligament at the elbow, and in the forearm by the interosseous membrane. Disruptions in any of these structures may lead to forearm instability, with consequences at each of the remaining structures.

Central Band Interosseous Membrane Reconstruction For Forearm Longitudinal Instability.

BACKGROUND: The Essex-Lopresti injury results from injuries to the stabilizing structures of the forearm, the radial head, the interosseous membrane, and the triangular fibrocartilage complex. CASE DESCRIPTION/LITERATURE REVIEW: We describe principles in approaching the patient with an acute or chronic Essex-Lopresti injury and describe surgical techniques to address these challenging cases both in the acute and chronic setting and describe outcomes of these techniques. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Further research into the role of the interosseous ligament in providing longitudinal and transverse stability to the forearm is likely to change our understanding of the Essex-Lopresti injury and alter management strategies.

Where Are the Women in Orthopaedic Surgery?

BACKGROUND: Although women account for approximately half of the medical students in the United States, they represent only 13% of orthopaedic surgery residents and 4% of members of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS). Furthermore, a smaller relative percentage of women pursue careers in orthopaedic surgery than in any other subspecialty. Formal investigations regarding the gender discrepancy in choice of orthopaedic surgery are lacking. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What reasons do women orthopaedic surgeons cite for why they chose this specialty? (2) What perceptions do women orthopaedic surgeons think might deter other women from pursuing this field? (3) What role does early exposure to orthopaedics and mentorship play in this choice? (4) What professional and personal choices do women in orthopaedics make, and how might this inform students who are choosing a career path? METHODS: A 21-question survey was emailed to all active, candidate, and resident members of the Ruth Jackson Orthopaedic Society (RJOS, n = 556). RJOS is the oldest surgical women's organization incorporated in the United States. An independent orthopaedic specialty society, RJOS supports leadership training, mentorship, grant opportunities, and advocacy for its members and promotes sex-related musculoskeletal research. Although not all women in orthopaedic practice or training belong to RJOS, it is estimated that 42% of women AAOS fellows are RJOS members. Questions were formulated to determine demographics, practice patterns, and lifestyle choices of women who chose orthopaedic surgery as a specialty. Specifically, we evaluated the respondents' decisions about their careers and their opinions of why more women do not choose this field. For the purpose of this analysis, the influences and dissuaders were divided into three major categories: personal attributes, experience/exposure, and work/life considerations. RESULTS: The most common reasons cited for having chosen orthopaedic surgery were enjoyment of manual tasks (165 of 232 [71%]), professional satisfaction (125 of 232 [54%]), and intellectual stimulation (123 of 232 [53%]). The most common reasons indicated for why women might not choose orthopaedics included perceived inability to have a good work/life balance (182 of 232 [78%]), perception that too much physical strength is required (171 of 232 [74%]), and lack of strong mentorship in medical school or earlier (161 of 232 [69%]). Respondents frequently (29 of 45 [64%]) commented that their role models, mentors, and early exposure to musculoskeletal medicine were influential, but far fewer (62 of 231 [27%]) acknowledged these in their top five influences than they did the more "internal" motivators. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the largest study of women orthopaedic surgeons regarding factors influencing their professional and personal choices. Our data suggest that the relatively few women currently practicing orthopaedics were attracted to the field because of their individual personal affinity for its nature despite the lack of role models and exposure. The latter factors may impact the continued paucity of women pursuing this field. Programs designed to improve mentorship and increase early exposure to orthopaedics and orthopaedic surgeons may increase personal interest in the field and will be important to attract a diverse group of trainees to our specialty in the future.

Prevalence of palmar fibromatosis with and without contracture in asymptomatic patients.

BACKGROUND: This retrospective study documents the proportion of hand clinic patients presenting with palmar fibromatosis with and without contracture. METHODS: All "new" patients >18 years presenting to a single surgeon's hand clinic over a 16-month period were included, and information was abstracted from chart review regarding patient demographics, reason for presentation, presence or absence of palmar fibromatosis, contracture, and prior known diagnosis of Dupuytren's disease. The percentage of asymptomatic patients with palmar fibromatosis was calculated. RESULTS: Of 827 patients, 306 had palmar fibromatosis. Among all patients, 33% of male and 40% of female patients had palmar fibromatosis. Only 8% had contractures, while 92% had palmar fibromatosis without contracture. Among those who had contractures, 81% presented with a primary complaint of Dupuytren's disease (symptomatic contracture). Prevalence of palmar fibromatosis increased with increasing age. CONCLUSION: The findings demonstrate that Dupuytren's palmar fibromatosis is common and often present without overt contractures.